The role of intraoperative monitoring in target selection in deep brain stimulation: A single centre study

Introduction

Intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) and intraoperative test stimulation may provide vital information for optimal electrode placement and clinical outcome in movement disorders patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS). The aims of this retrospective study were to determine (i) how often the planned (imaging based) placements of electrodes were changed due to MER and intraoperative test stimulation in Parkinson's disease (PD), dystonia and essential tremor (ET) patients; (ii) whether the frequency of repositioning changed over time; (iii) whether patients' age or disease duration (in PD) influenced the frequency of repositioning.

Methods

Data on the planned and the final placement of 141 electrodes in 72 consecutive DBS treated patients (52 PD, 11 dystonia, 9 ET) was collected over the first 8 years of DBS implementation in a single center. An association between the rate of electrode repositioning and the patients' age, disease duration and the time/year of implementation was explored.

Results

Analysis of all targets showed a change in final electrode placement in 39.7 % (56/141); 39.8 % (41/103) in PD, 40.9 % (9/22) in dystonia and 37.5 % (6/16) in ET. Annual analysis showed a decrease in rate of repositioning between the centre's first and eighth year (p = 0.013) of implementation. No correlation was found between electrode repositioning rate and patient age (p = 0.42) nor disease duration (p = 0.09) in PD.

Conclusion

This retrospective analysis confirms the benefit of MER and intraoperative test stimulation during DBS surgery in determining the final electrode position during the early / initial period of implementing the procedure. Our findings show a learning curve in successful preoperative planning in our centre achieved through experience.

Clinical Evaluation of the NaviNetics Stereotactic System Using Intraoperative Portable Surgical Imaging System in DBS Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A typical workflow for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery consists of head frame placement, followed by stereotactic computed tomography (CT) or MRI before surgical implantation of the hardware. At some institutions, this workflow is prolonged when the imaging scanner is located far away from the operating room, thereby increasing workflow times by the addition of transport times. Recently, the intraoperative O-arm has been shown to provide accurate image fusion with preoperative CT or MR imaging, suggesting the possibility of obtaining an intraoperative localization scan and postoperative confirmation. In this article, we aim to evaluate the compatibility of the stereotactic frame system with the intraoperative O-arm system regarding lead accuracy and surgical flow.

METHODS

A total of 17 patients undergoing DBS surgery for movement disorders were evaluated. One patient underwent both the stereotactic CT and O-arm localization, while 16 patients underwent only intraoperative O-arm localization. Following lead placement, intraoperative O-arm imaging was obtained to evaluate the accuracy of the lead placement. Accuracy was defined as the error measured as the distance from the center of the planned trajectory to the cannula.

RESULTS

Less than 0.1 mm difference was found between the O-arm imaging technique and CT image localization of the NaviNetics stereotactic head frame in DBS surgery. Of the 16 patients who underwent the intraoperative O-arm imaging alone, the targets included bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus (16 leads), bilateral globus pallidus internus (4 leads), and subthalamic nucleus (12 leads). The mean ± SD radial error in the probe's eye view was 0.71 ± 0.33 mm for n = 32 leads. No tract hemorrhage was observed.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative O-arm imaging can be used safely and effectively for stereotactic registration and lead placement confirmation with the stereotactic system in both awake and asleep DBS surgery.

Intraprocedural Three-Dimensional Imaging Registration Optimizes Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound and Facilitates Novel Applications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has revolutionized ablative treatment of essential tremor in recent years. However, limitations in precision targeting may account for suboptimal efficacy and significant side effects. We describe a simple intraprocedural three-dimensional image-guided lesion shaping technique that can improve overall outcomes of MRgFUS for essential tremor and facilitate expansion to novel indications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 84 consecutive MRgFUS procedures performed at Pennsylvania Hospital was performed. Comparison of patient demographics, treatment parameters, and clinical outcomes before and after implementation of this protocol was conducted. Further application of this technique in pallidotomy treatments and ablative disconnection of hypothalamic hamartoma are described.

RESULTS

After implementation, the median of total number of sonications (7 vs 9, P = .001), number of therapeutic sonications (3 vs 4, P < .0001), and interval time between the first and last sonication (46:10 vs 68:53 minutes, P = .0004) were significantly reduced. Patients expressed greater satisfaction of treatment (94.1% vs 82.4%, P = .018), greater global impression of change (CGI) (7 vs 6, P = .033), and reduced median number of side effects at 6 months (0 vs 1, P = .026). We also successfully implemented this protocol for novel indications.

CONCLUSION

Intraprocedural lesion shaping for MRgFUS is a simple and versatile imaging protocol augmentation that improves ablation precision and can improve treatment efficacy and broader neurological application.

Placement accuracy of the second electrode in bilateral deep brain stimulation surgery

PURPOSE

Due to brain shift during bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, placement of the second electrode may be subjected to more error than that of the first electrode. The authors aimed to investigate the accuracy of second electrode placement in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients with Parkinson's disease who underwent bilateral DBS surgery (110 electrodes) were retrospectively evaluated. The targets were subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) in 40 and 15 cases, respectively. Preoperative planning and postoperative electrode images were co-registered to compare the error margin between the two sides.

RESULTS

There is a statistically significant difference in the directional axis error along the y axis only when comparing each laterality (posterior 0.04 ± 1.21 mm vs anterior 0.41 ± 1.07 mm, p = 0.006). There is no significant difference of other error parameters, final track location, and number of microelectrode recording passes between the two sides. In a subgroup analysis, there is a significant difference in directional axis error along the y axis only in the STN subgroup (posterior 0.40 ± 1.05 mm vs anterior 0.18 ± 1.04 mm, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Although a statistically significant difference in directional axis error along the y axis was found between first and second electrode placements in the STN group but not in the GPi group, its magnitude is well below the clinically significant threshold.

How Accurate Is Frameless Fiducial-Free Deep Brain Stimulation?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Frameless deep brain stimulation (DBS) offers advantages in terms of patient comfort and reduced operative time. However, the need for bony fiducial markers for localization remains a drawback due to the time-consuming and uncomfortable procedure. An alternative localization method involves the direct tracking of an intraoperative 3-dimensional scanner. This study aims to assess the accuracy of the NexFrame frameless DBS system in conjunction with the O-Arm (Medtronic Inc.), both with and without fiducial markers.

METHODS

The locations of 100 DBS leads were determined, with 50 cases using fiducial-free localization and 50 involving fiducial markers. The coordinates were compared with the expected intraoperative targets. Absolute errors in the X, Y, and Z coordinates (ΔX, ΔY, and ΔZ) were calculated, along with the vector error (Euclidean) (vector error ).

RESULTS

The vector error averaged 1.61 ± 0.49 mm (right) and 1.52 ± 0.60 mm (left) for the group without fiducial bone markers and 1.66 ± 0.69 (right) and 1.44 ± 0.65 mm (left) for the other cohort (P = .76 right; P = .67 left). Absolute errors in the X, Y, and Z coordinates for the fiducial-free group were 0.88 ± 0.55, 0.79 ± 0.45, and 0.79 ± 0.57 mm (right) and 0.72 ± 0.37, 0.78 ± 0.56, and 0.77 ± 0.71 mm (left). For the group with fiducial markers, these errors were 0.87 ± 0.72, 0.92 ± 0.39, and 0.86 ± 0.50 mm (right) and 0.75 ± 0.33, 0.80 ± 0.51, and 0.73 ± 0.64 mm (left) with no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of the accuracy of NexFrame DBS, both with and without fiducial markers, using an intraoperative navigable cone-beam computed tomography, demonstrates that both techniques provide sufficient and equivalent 3-dimensional accuracy.

Evolution of Deep Brain Stimulation Techniques for Complication Mitigation

Complication mitigation in deep brain stimulation has been a topic matter of much discussion in the literature. In this article, we examine how neurosurgeons as individuals and as a field generated and adapted techniques to prevent infection, lead fracture/lead migration, and suboptimal outcomes in both the acute period and longitudinally. The authors performed a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles from 1987 to June 2023 including human studies written in English. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers (J.P. and R.M.) performed a title screen. Of the 776 articles, 252 were selected by title screen and 172 from abstract review for full-text evaluation. Ultimately, 124 publications were evaluated. We describe the initial complications and inefficiencies at the advent of deep brain stimulation and detail changes instituted by surgeons that reduced them. Furthermore, we discuss the trend in both undesired short-term and long-term outcomes with emphasis on how surgeons recognized and modified their practice to provide safer and better procedures. This scoping review adds to the literature as a guide to both new neurosurgeons and seasoned neurosurgeons alike to understand better what innovations have been trialed over time as we embark on novel targets and neuromodulatory technologies.

Persistence of Basal Ganglia Oscillatory Activity During Tremor Attenuation by Movement in Parkinson's Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

One of the characteristics of parkinsonian tremor is that its amplitude decreases with movement. Current models suggest an interaction between basal ganglia (BG) and cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuits in parkinsonian tremor pathophysiology.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to correlate central oscillation in the BG with electromyographic activity during re-emergent tremor in order to detect changes in BG oscillatory activity when tremor is attenuated by movement.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational study on consecutive parkinsonian patients who underwent deep brain stimulation surgery and presented re-emergent tremor. Coherence analysis between subthalamic nucleus/globus pallidus internus (STN/GPi) tremorous activity measured by microrecording (MER) and electromyogram (EMG) from flexor and extensor wrist muscles during rest, posture, and re-emergent tremor pause was performed during surgery. The statistical significance level of the MER-EMG coherence was determined using surrogate data analysis, and the directionality of information transfer between BG and muscle was performed using entropy transfer analysis.

RESULTS

We analyzed 148 MERs with tremor-like activity from 6 patients which were evaluated against the simultaneous EMGs, resulting in 296 correlations. Of these, 26 presented a significant level of coherence at tremor frequency, throughout rest and posture, with a complete EMG stop in between. During the pause, all recordings showed sustained MER peaks at tremor frequency (±1.5 Hz). Information flows preferentially from BG to muscle during rest and posture, with a loss of directionality during the pause.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that oscillatory activity in STN/GPi functionally linked to tremor sustains firing frequency during re-emergent tremor pause, thus suggesting no direct role of the BG circuit on tremor attenuation due to voluntary movements. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

General anesthesia versus local anesthesia for deep brain stimulation targeting of STN in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a viable therapeutic for advanced Parkinson's disease. However, the efficacy and safety of STN-DBS under local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA) remain controversial. This meta-analysis aims to compare them using an expanded sample size.

METHODS

The databases of Embase, Cochrane Library and Medline were systematically searched for eligible cohort studies published between 1967 and 2023. Clinical efficacy was assessed using either Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) section III scores or levodopa equivalent dosage requirements. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess complications (adverse effects related to stimulation, general neurological and surgical complications, and hardware-related complications).

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, comprising of 13 retrospective cohort studies and 2 prospective cohort studies, involving a total of 943 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicate that there were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regards to improvement in UPDRS III score or postoperative levodopa equivalent dosage requirement. However, subgroup analysis revealed that patients who underwent GA with intraoperative imaging had higher UPDRS III score improvement compared to those who received LA with microelectrode recording (MER) (P = .03). No significant difference was found in the improvement of UPDRS III scores between the GA group and LA group with MER. Additionally, there were no notable differences in the incidence rates of complications between these 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicates that STN-DBS performed under GA or LA have similar clinical outcomes and complications. Therefore, GA may be a suitable option for patients with severe symptoms who cannot tolerate the procedure under LA. Additionally, the GA group with intraoperative imaging showed better clinical outcomes than the LA group with MER. A more compelling conclusion would require larger prospective cohort studies with a substantial patient population and extended long follow-up to validate.

A Systematic Review of Neurophysiology-Based Localization Techniques Used in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery of the Subthalamic Nucleus

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review is conducted to identify, compare, and analyze neurophysiological feature selection, extraction, and classification to provide a comprehensive reference on neurophysiology-based subthalamic nucleus (STN) localization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review was carried out using the methods and guidelines of the Kitchenham systematic review and provides an in-depth analysis on methods proposed on STN localization discussed in the literature between 2000 and 2021. Three research questions were formulated, and 115 publications were identified to answer the questions.

RESULTS

The three research questions formulated are answered using the literature found on the respective topics. This review discussed the technologies used in past research, and the performance of the state-of-the-art techniques is also reviewed.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides a comprehensive reference on neurophysiology-based STN localization by reviewing the research questions other new researchers may also have.

Evaluation of 3D C-Arm Fluoroscopy versus Diagnostic CT for Deep Brain Stimulation Stereotactic Registration and Post-Operative Lead Localization

INTRODUCTION

DBS efficacy depends on accuracy. CT-MRI fusion is established for both stereotactic registration and electrode placement verification. The desire to streamline DBS workflows, reduce operative time, and minimize patient transfers has increased interest in portable imaging modalities such as the Medtronic O-arm® and mobile CT. However, these remain expensive and bulky. 3D C-arm fluoroscopy (3DXT) units are a smaller and less costly alternative, albeit incompatible with traditional frame-based localization and without useful soft tissue resolution. We aimed to compare fusion of 3DXT and CT with pre-operative MRI to evaluate if 3DXT-MRI fusion alone is sufficient for accurate registration and reliable targeting verification. We further assess DBS targeting accuracy using a 3DXT workflow and compare radiation dosimetry between modalities.

METHODS

Patients underwent robot-assisted DBS implantation using a workflow incorporating 3DXT which we describe. Two intra-operative 3DXT spins were performed for registration and accuracy verification followed by conventional CT post-operatively. Post-operative 3DXT and CT images were independently fused to the same pre-operative MRI sequence and co-ordinates generated for comparison. Registration accuracy was compared to 15 consecutive controls who underwent CT-based registration. Radial targeting accuracy was calculated and radiation dosimetry recorded.

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 29 leads in 15 consecutive patients. 3DXT registration accuracy was significantly superior to CT with mean error 0.22 ± 0.03 mm (p < 0.0001). Mean Euclidean electrode tip position variation for CT to MRI versus 3DXT to MRI fusion was 0.62 ± 0.40 mm (range 0.0 mm-1.7 mm). In comparison, direct CT to 3DXT fusion showed electrode tip Euclidean variance of 0.23 ± 0.09 mm. Mean radial targeting accuracy assessed on 3DXT was 0.97 ± 0.54 mm versus 1.15 ± 0.55 mm on CT with differences insignificant (p = 0.30). Mean patient radiation doses were around 80% lower with 3DXT versus CT (p < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

Mobile 3D C-arm fluoroscopy can be safely incorporated into DBS workflows for both registration and lead verification. For registration, the limited field of view requires the use of frameless transient fiducials and is highly accurate. For lead position verification based on MRI co-registration, we estimate there is around a 0.4 mm discrepancy between lead position seen on 3DXT versus CT when corrected for brain shift. This is similar to that described in O-arm® or mobile CT series. For units where logistical or financial considerations preclude the acquisition of a cone beam CT or mobile CT scanner, our data support portable 3D C-arm fluoroscopy as an acceptable alternative with significantly lower radiation exposure.

Visualization of volume of tissue activated modeling in a clinical planning system for deep brain stimulation

BACKGROUND

Pathway activating models try to describe stimulation spread in deep brain stimulation (DBS). Volume of tissue activated (VTA) models are simplified model variants allowing faster and easier computation. Our study aimed to investigate, how VTA visualization can be integrated into a clinical workflow applying directional electrodes using a standard clinical DBS planning system.

METHODS

Twelve patients underwent DBS, using directional electrodes for bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Preoperative 3T magnetic resonance imaging was used for automatic visualization of the STN outline, as well as for fiber tractography. Intraoperative computed tomography was used for automatic lead detection. The Guide XT software, closely integrated into the DBS planning software environment, was used for VTA calculation and visualization.

RESULTS

VTA visualization was possible in all cases. The percentage of VTA covering the STN volume ranged from 25% to 100% (mean: 60±25%) on the left side and from 0% to 98% (51±30%) on the right side. The mean coordinate of all VTA centers was: 12.6±1.2 mm lateral, 2.1±1.2 mm posterior, and 2.3±1.4 mm inferior in relation to the midcommissural point. Stimulation effects can be compared to the VTA visualization in relation to surrounding structures, potentially facilitating programming, which might be especially beneficial in case of suboptimal lead placement.

CONCLUSIONS

VTA visualization in a clinical planning system allows an intuitive adjustment of the stimulation parameters, supports programming, and enhances understanding of effects and side effects of DBS.

Day one postoperative MRI findings following electrode placement for deep brain stimulation: analysis of a large case series

Objective

This study sought to characterize postoperative day one MRI findings in deep brain stimulation (DBS) patients.

Methods

DBS patients were identified by CPT and had their reviewed by a trained neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon blinded to MR sequence and patient information. The radiographic abnormalities of interest were track microhemorrhage, pneumocephalus, hematomas, and edema, and the occurrence of these findings in compare the detection of these complications between T1/T2 gradient-echo (GRE) and T1/T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences was compared. The presence, size, and association of susceptibility artifact with other radiographic abnormalities was also described. Lastly, the association of multiple microelectrode cannula passes with each radiographic finding was evaluated. Ad-hoc investigation evaluated hemisphere-specific associations. Multiple logistic regression with Bonferroni correction (corrected p = 0.006) was used for all analysis.

Results

Out of 198 DBS patients reviewed, 115 (58%) patients showed entry microhemorrhage; 77 (39%) track microhemorrhage; 44 (22%) edema; 69 (35%) pneumocephalus; and 12 (6%) intracranial hematoma. T2 GRE was better for detecting microhemorrhage (OR = 14.82, p < 0.0001 for entry site and OR = 4.03, p < 0.0001 for track) and pneumocephalus (OR = 11.86, p < 0.0001), while T2 FLAIR was better at detecting edema (OR = 123.6, p < 0.0001). The relatively common findings of microhemorrhage and edema were best visualized by T2 GRE and T2 FLAIR sequences, respectively. More passes intraoperatively was associated with detection of ipsilateral track microhemorrhage (OR = 7.151, p < 0.0001 left; OR = 8.953, p < 0.0001 right). Susceptibility artifact surrounding electrodes possibly interfered with further detection of ipsilateral edema (OR = 4.323, p = 0.0025 left hemisphere only).

Discussion

Day one postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for DBS patients can be used to detect numerous radiographic abnormalities not identifiable on a computed tomographic (CT) scan. For this cohort, multiple stimulating cannula passes intraoperatively was associated with increased microhemorrhage along the electrode track. Further studies should be performed to evaluate the clinical relevance of these observations.

Comparison of direct MRI guided versus atlas-based targeting for subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus deep brain stimulation

PURPOSE

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be defined by atlas coordinates or direct visualisation of the target on MRI. The aim of this study was to evaluate geometric differences between atlas-based targeting and MRI-guided direct targeting.

METHODS

One-hundred-nine Parkinson's disease or dystonia patients records who underwent DBS surgery between 2005 and 2016 were prospectively reviewed. MRI-guided direct targeting coordinates was used to implant 205 STN and 64 GPi electrodes and compared with atlas-based coordinates.

RESULTS

The directly targeted coordinates (mean, SD, range) for STN were x: [9.9 ± 1.1 (7.1 - 13.2)], y: [-0.8 ± 1.1 (-4.2 - 2)] and z: [-4.7 ± 0.53 (-5.9 - -3.2)]. The mean value for the STN was 2.1 mm more medial (p < 0.0001), 1.2 mm more anterior (p < 0.0001) and 0.7 mm more ventral (p < 0.0001) than the atlas target. The targeted coordinates for GPi were x: [22.3 ± 2.0 (17.8 - 26.1)], y: [-0.2 ± 2.2 (-4.5 - 3.4)], z: [-4.3 ± 0.8 (-6.2 - -2.3)]. The mean value for the GPi was 2.2 mm (p < 0.001) more posterior and 0.3 mm (p < 0.01) more ventral than the atlas-based coordinates.

CONCLUSION

MRI-guided targeting may be more accurate than atlas-based targeting due to individual variations in anatomy.

Accurate Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Placement Concurrent With Research Electrocorticography

BACKGROUND

Using electrocorticography for research (R-ECoG) during deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery has advanced our understanding of human cortical-basal ganglia neurophysiology and mechanisms of therapeutic circuit modulation. The safety of R-ECoG has been established, but potential effects of temporary ECoG strip placement on targeting accuracy have not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether temporary subdural electrode strip placement during DBS implantation surgery affects lead implantation accuracy.

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective database who underwent awake DBS surgery were identified. Ten of 24 subjects participated in R-ECoG. Lead locations were determined after fusing postoperative computed tomography scans into the surgical planning software. The effect of brain shift was quantified using Lead-DBS and analyzed in a mixed-effects model controlling for time interval to postoperative computed tomography. Targeting accuracy was reported as radial and Euclidean distance errors and compared with Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

Neither radial error nor Euclidean distance error differed significantly between R-ECoG participants and nonparticipants. Pneumocephalus volume did not differ between the 2 groups, but brain shift was slightly greater with R-ECoG. Pneumocephalus volume correlated with brain shift, but neither of these measures significantly correlated with Euclidean distance error. There were no complications in either group.

CONCLUSION

In addition to an excellent general safety profile as has been reported previously, these results suggest that performing R-ECoG during DBS implantation surgery does not affect the accuracy of lead placement.

Where Position Matters-Deep-Learning-Driven Normalization and Coregistration of Computed Tomography in the Postoperative Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation

INTRODUCTION

Recent developments in the postoperative evaluation of deep brain stimulation surgery on the group level warrant the detection of achieved electrode positions based on postoperative imaging. Computed tomography (CT) is a frequently used imaging modality, but because of its idiosyncrasies (high spatial accuracy at low soft tissue resolution), it has not been sufficient for the parallel determination of electrode position and details of the surrounding brain anatomy (nuclei). The common solution is rigid fusion of CT images and magnetic resonance (MR) images, which have much better soft tissue contrast and allow accurate normalization into template spaces. Here, we explored a deep-learning approach to directly relate positions (usually the lead position) in postoperative CT images to the native anatomy of the midbrain and group space.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Deep learning is used to create derived tissue contrasts (white matter, gray matter, cerebrospinal fluid, brainstem nuclei) based on the CT image; that is, a convolution neural network (CNN) takes solely the raw CT image as input and outputs several tissue probability maps. The ground truth is based on coregistrations with MR contrasts. The tissue probability maps are then used to either rigidly coregister or normalize the CT image in a deformable way to group space. The CNN was trained in 220 patients and tested in a set of 80 patients.

RESULTS

Rigorous validation of such an approach is difficult because of the lack of ground truth. We examined the agreements between the classical and proposed approaches and considered the spread of implantation locations across a group of identically implanted subjects, which serves as an indicator of the accuracy of the lead localization procedure. The proposed procedure agrees well with current magnetic resonance imaging-based techniques, and the spread is comparable or even lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative CT imaging alone is sufficient for accurate localization of the midbrain nuclei and normalization to the group space. In the context of group analysis, it seems sufficient to have a single postoperative CT image of good quality for inclusion. The proposed approach will allow researchers and clinicians to include cases that were not previously suitable for analysis.

Basis for error in stereotactic and computer-assisted surgery in neurosurgical applications: literature review

Technological advancements in optoelectronic motion capture systems have allowed for the development of high-precision computer-assisted surgery (CAS) used in cranial and spinal surgical procedures. Errors generated sequentially throughout the chain of components of CAS may have cumulative effect on the accuracy of implant and instrumentation placement - potentially affecting patient outcomes. Navigational integrity and maintenance of fidelity of optoelectronic data is the cornerstone of CAS. Error reporting measures vary between studies. Understanding error generation, mechanisms of propagation, and how they relate to workflow can assist clinicians in error mitigation and improve accuracy during navigation in neurosurgical procedures. Diligence in planning, fiducial positioning, system registration, and intra-operative workflow have the potential to improve accuracy and decrease disparity between planned and final instrumentation and implant position. This study reviews the potential errors associated with each step in computer-assisted surgery and provides a basis for disparity in intrinsic accuracy versus achieved accuracy in the clinical operative environment.

Targeting Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes of Awake Vs Asleep Interventional MRI-Guided Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: The UCSF Experience

BACKGROUND

Interventional MRI (iMRI)-guided implantation of deep brain stimulator (DBS) leads has been developed to treat patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) without the need for awake testing.

OBJECTIVE

Direct comparisons of targeting accuracy and clinical outcomes for awake stereotactic with asleep iMRI-DBS for PD are limited.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients with PD who underwent awake or iMRI-guided DBS surgery targeting the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus interna between 2013 and 2019 at our institution. Outcome measures included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III scores, levodopa equivalent daily dose, radial error between intended and actual lead locations, stimulation parameters, and complications.

RESULTS

Of the 218 patients included in the study, the iMRI cohort had smaller radial errors (iMRI: 1.27 ± 0.72 mm, awake: 1.59 ± 0.96 mm, P < .01) and fewer lead passes (iMRI: 1.0 ± 0.16, awake: 1.2 ± 0.41, P < .01). Changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale were similar between modalities, but awake cases had a greater reduction in levodopa equivalent daily dose than iMRI cases (P < .01), which was attributed to the greater number of awake subthalamic nucleus cases on multivariate analysis. Effective clinical contacts used for stimulation, side effect thresholds, and complication rates were similar between modalities.

CONCLUSION

Although iMRI-DBS may result in more accurate lead placement for intended target compared with awake-DBS, clinical outcomes were similar between surgical approaches. Ultimately, patient preference and surgeon experience with a given DBS technique should be the main factors when determining the "best" method for DBS implantation.

Electrically evoked and spontaneous neural activity in the subthalamic nucleus under general anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is commonly performed with the patient awake to facilitate assessments of electrode positioning. However, awake neurosurgery can be a barrier to patients receiving DBS. Electrode implantation can be performed with the patient under general anesthesia (GA) using intraoperative imaging, although such techniques are not widely available. Electrophysiological features can also aid in the identification of target neural regions and provide functional evidence of electrode placement. Here we assess the presence and positional variation under GA of spontaneous beta and high-frequency oscillation (HFO) activity, and evoked resonant neural activity (ERNA), a novel evoked response localized to the subthalamic nucleus.

METHODS

ERNA, beta, and HFO were intraoperatively recorded from DBS leads comprising four individual electrodes immediately after bilateral awake implantation into the subthalamic nucleus of 21 patients with Parkinson's disease (42 hemispheres) and after subsequent GA induction deep enough to perform pulse generator implantation. The main anesthetic agent was either propofol (10 patients) or sevoflurane (11 patients).

RESULTS

GA reduced the amplitude of ERNA, beta, and HFO activity (p < 0.001); however, ERNA amplitudes remained large in comparison to spontaneous local field potentials. Notably, a moderately strong correlation between awake ERNA amplitude and electrode distance to an "ideal" therapeutic target within dorsal STN was preserved under GA (awake: ρ = -0.73, adjusted p value [padj] < 0.001; GA: ρ = -0.69, padj < 0.001). In contrast, correlations were diminished under GA for beta (awake: ρ = -0.45, padj < 0.001; GA: ρ = -0.13, padj = 0.12) and HFO (awake: ρ = -0.69, padj < 0.001; GA: ρ = -0.33, padj < 0.001). The largest ERNA occurred at the same electrode (awake vs GA) for 35/42 hemispheres (83.3%) and corresponded closely to the electrode selected by the clinician for chronic therapy at 12 months (awake ERNA 77.5%, GA ERNA 82.5%). The largest beta amplitude occurred at the same electrode (awake vs GA) for only 17/42 (40.5%) hemispheres and 21/42 (50%) for HFO. The electrode measuring the largest awake beta and HFO amplitudes corresponded to the electrode selected by the clinician for chronic therapy at 12 months in 60% and 70% of hemispheres, respectively. However, this correspondence diminished substantially under GA (beta 20%, HFO 35%).

CONCLUSIONS

ERNA is a robust electrophysiological signal localized to the dorsal subthalamic nucleus subregion that is largely preserved under GA, indicating it could feasibly guide electrode implantation, either alone or in complementary use with existing methods.

Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease: A Review and Future Outlook

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that manifests as an impairment of motor and non-motor abilities due to a loss of dopamine input to deep brain structures. While there is presently no cure for PD, a variety of pharmacological and surgical therapeutic interventions have been developed to manage PD symptoms. This review explores the past, present and future outlooks of PD treatment, with particular attention paid to deep brain stimulation (DBS), the surgical procedure to deliver DBS, and its limitations. Finally, our group's efforts with respect to brain mapping for DBS targeting will be discussed.

Predict initial subthalamic nucleus stimulation outcome in Parkinson's disease with brain morphology

AIM

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) has been reported to be effective in treating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), which may be attributed to changes in the brain network. However, the association between brain morphology and initial STN-DBS efficacy, as well as the performance of prediction using neuroimaging, has not been well illustrated. Therefore, we aim to investigate these issues.

METHODS

In the present study, 94 PD patients underwent bilateral STN-DBS, and the initial stimulation efficacy was evaluated. Brain morphology was examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The volume of tissue activated in the motor STN was measured with MRI and computed tomography. The prediction of stimulation efficacy was achieved with a support vector machine, using brain morphology and other features, after feature selection and hyperparameter optimization.

RESULTS

A higher stimulation efficacy was correlated with a thicker right precentral cortex. No association with subcortical gray or white matter volumes was observed. These morphological features could estimate the individual stimulation response with an r value of 0.5678, an R² of 0.3224, and an average error of 11.4%. The permutation test suggested these predictions were not based on chance.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that changes in morphology are associated with the initial stimulation motor response and could be used to predict individual initial stimulation-related motor responses.

Long-Term Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation for Pediatric Dystonia

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been utilized for over two decades to treat medication-refractory dystonia in children. Short-term benefit has been demonstrated for inherited, isolated, and idiopathic cases, with less efficacy in heredodegenerative and acquired dystonia. The ongoing publication of long-term outcomes warrants a critical assessment of available information as pediatric patients are expected to live most of their lives with these implants.

SUMMARY

We performed a review of the literature for data describing motor and neuropsychiatric outcomes, in addition to complications, 5 or more years after DBS placement in patients undergoing DBS surgery for dystonia at an age younger than 21. We identified 20 articles including individual data on long-term motor outcomes after DBS for a total of 78 patients. In addition, we found five articles reporting long-term outcomes after DBS in 9 patients with status dystonicus. Most patients were implanted within the globus pallidus internus, with only a few cases targeting the subthalamic nucleus and ventrolateral posterior nucleus of the thalamus. The average follow-up was 8.5 years, with a range of up to 22 years. Long-term outcomes showed a sustained motor benefit, with median Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating score improvement ranging from 2.5% to 93.2% in different dystonia subtypes. Patients with inherited, isolated, and idiopathic dystonias had greater improvement than those with heredodegenerative and acquired dystonias. Sustained improvements in quality of life were also reported, without the development of significant cognitive or psychiatric comorbidities. Late adverse events tended to be hardware-related, with minimal stimulation-induced effects.

KEY MESSAGES

While data regarding long-term outcomes is somewhat limited, particularly with regards to neuropsychiatric outcomes and adverse events, improvement in motor outcomes appears to be preserved more than 5 years after DBS placement.

Direct targeting of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a prospective study with comparison to a historical cohort

OBJECTIVE

The ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) is an effective target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) to control symptoms related to essential tremor. The VIM is typically targeted using indirect methods, although studies have reported visualization of the VIM on proton density-weighted MRI. This study compares the outcomes between patients who underwent VIM DBS with direct and indirect targeting.

METHODS

Between August 2013 and December 2019, 230 patients underwent VIM DBS at the senior author's institution. Of these patients, 92 had direct targeting (direct visualization on proton density 3-T MRI). The remaining 138 patients had indirect targeting (relative to the third ventricle and anterior commissure-posterior commissure line).

RESULTS

Coordinates of electrodes placed with direct targeting were significantly more lateral (p < 0.001) and anterior (p < 0.001) than those placed with indirect targeting. The optimal stimulation amplitude for devices measured in voltage was lower for those who underwent direct targeting than for those who underwent indirect targeting (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing direct targeting had a greater improvement only in their Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire hobby score versus those undergoing indirect targeting (p = 0.04). The direct targeting group had substantially more symptomatic hemorrhages than the indirect targeting group (p = 0.04). All patients who experienced a postoperative hemorrhage after DBS recovered without intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent direct VIM targeting for DBS treatment of essential tremor had similar clinical outcomes to those who underwent indirect targeting. Direct VIM targeting is safe and effective.

Electrophysiologic Mapping for Target Acquisition in Deep Brain Stimulation May Become Unnecessary in the Era of Intraoperative Imaging

OBJECTIVE

Electrophysiologic mapping (EM) has been instrumental in advancing neuroscience and ensuring accurate lead placement for deep brain stimulation. However, EM is associated with increased operative time, expense, and potential risk. Intraoperative imaging to verify lead placement provides an opportunity to reassess the clinical role of EM. We investigated whether EM 1) provides new information that corrects suboptimal preoperative target selection by the physician or 2) simply corrects intraoperative stereotactic error, which can instead be quickly corrected with intraoperative imaging.

METHODS

Deep brain stimulation lead location errors were evaluated by measuring whether repositioning leads based on EM directed the final lead placement 1) away from or 2) toward the original target. We retrospectively identified 50 patients with 61 leads that required repositioning directed by EM. The stereotactic coordinates of each lead were determined with intraoperative computed tomography.

RESULTS

In 45 of 61 leads (74%), the electrophysiologically directed repositioning moved the lead toward the initial target. The mean radial errors between the preoperative plan and targeted contact coordinates before and after repositioning were 2.2 and 1.5 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). Microelectrode recording was more likely than test stimulation to direct leads toward the initial target (88% vs. 63%; P = 0.03). The nucleus targeted was associated with the likelihood of moving toward the initial target.

CONCLUSIONS

Electrophysiologic mapping corrected primarily for errors in lead placement rather than providing new information regarding errors in target selection. Thus, intraoperative imaging and improvements in stereotactic techniques may reduce or even eliminate dependence on EM.

Fusing of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance and Intraoperative O-arm Images in Deep Brain Stimulation Enhance Intuitive Surgical Planning and Increase Accuracy of Lead Placement

Intraoperative fluoroscopy and microelectrode recording (MER) are useful techniques for guiding lead placement in deep brain stimulation (DBS). Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have enabled information on the location of the basal ganglia, as the target of DBS, to be obtained preoperatively. However, intraoperative images with few artifacts are required to enable accurate fusion of preoperative imaging data with intraoperative lead position data. With our method, we first fuse preoperative MRI and pre-frame fixed computed tomography (CT) images, then fuse the CT images exactly after mounting the frame, using this fusion image as a platform image. Compared with before and after frame fixation, the pre-frame fixed CT has less artifacts, facilitating the identification of soft tissues such as the ventricles and cortical surface on pre-frame fixed CT images. By fusing the structural information for these soft tissues between pre-frame fixed CT and MR images, this fusion process can provide improved accuracy that is intuitively understood by the surgeon. Using platform images, surgical planning and intraoperative lead positioning can then be evaluated on the same coordinate axis. Positional data on the lead acquired as three-dimensional (3D) data are then added to the platform image. The proposed surgical steps permit the acquisition of accurate lead position data.

Effect of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Microelectrode Recording during Frameless Stereotactic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease

BACKGROUND

Microelectrode recording (MER)-guided deep brain stimulation (DBS) remains the standard electrophysiological procedure to place the DBS lead at the optimal target. When single-track MER or test stimulation yields suboptimal results, trajectory adjustments are needed. Intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) can be useful to visualize the microelectrode and verify possible adjustments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of iCT in MER during frameless stereotactic DBS for Parkinson disease (PD).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 28 PD patients, of whom 19 received iCT and 9 did not, and measured intracranial volume, cerebral volume, cerebrospinal fluid volume, and pneumocephalus volume. Euclidean distance was assessed according to merged preoperative brain CT and magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative brain CT.

RESULTS

Fifty-six hemispheres in the 28 patients were analyzed for MER tracks. The patients who received iCT had a significantly lower mean number of MER tracks (1.6 vs. 2.6, P = 0.013) and lower mean Euclidean distance (2.2 mm vs. 2.7 mm, P = 0.033) compared with those who did not receive iCT. Although there was a trend of a decrease in pneumocephalus using intraoperative imaging, there was no significant difference in surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

iCT can reduce the number of MER tracks and increase surgical accuracy. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether iCT can reduce surgical complications and improve surgical outcomes.

Clinical outcomes of globus pallidus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: a comparison of intraoperative MRI- and MER-guided lead placement

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead placement is increasingly performed with the patient under general anesthesia by surgeons using intraoperative MRI (iMRI) guidance without microelectrode recording (MER) or macrostimulation. The authors assessed the accuracy of lead placement, safety, and motor outcomes in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) undergoing DBS lead placement into the globus pallidus internus (GPi) using iMRI or MER guidance.

METHODS

The authors identified all patients with PD who underwent either MER- or iMRI-guided GPi-DBS lead placement at Emory University between July 2007 and August 2016. Lead placement accuracy and adverse events were determined for all patients. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III motor scores for patients completing 12 months of follow-up. The authors also assessed the levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD) and stimulation parameters.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were identified (MER, n = 28; iMRI, n = 49), in whom 131 leads were placed. The stereotactic accuracy of the surgical procedure with respect to the planned lead location was 1.94 ± 0.21 mm (mean ± SEM) (95% CI 1.54-2.34) with frame-based MER and 0.84 ± 0.007 mm (95% CI 0.69-0.98) with iMRI. The rate of serious complications was similar, at 6.9% for MER-guided DBS lead placement and 9.4% for iMRI-guided DBS lead placement (RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.13%-3.9%]; p = 0.695). Fifty-seven patients were included in clinical outcome analyses (MER, n = 16; iMRI, n = 41). Both groups had similar characteristics at baseline, although patients undergoing MER-guided DBS had a lower response on their baseline levodopa challenge (44.8% ± 5.4% [95% CI 33.2%-56.4%] vs 61.6% ± 2.1% [95% CI 57.4%-65.8%]; t = 3.558, p = 0.001). Greater improvement was seen following iMRI-guided lead placement (43.2% ± 3.5% [95% CI 36.2%-50.3%]) versus MER-guided lead placement (25.5% ± 6.7% [95% CI 11.1%-39.8%]; F = 5.835, p = 0.019). When UPDRS III motor scores were assessed only in the contralateral hemibody (per-lead analyses), the improvements remained significantly different (37.1% ± 7.2% [95% CI 22.2%-51.9%] and 50.0% ± 3.5% [95% CI 43.1%-56.9%] for MER- and iMRI-guided DBS lead placement, respectively). Both groups exhibited similar reductions in LEDDs (21.2% and 20.9%, respectively; F = 0.221, p = 0.640). The locations of all active contacts and the 2D radial distance from these to consensus coordinates for GPi-DBS lead placement (x, ±20; y, +2; and z, -4) did not differ statistically by type of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

iMRI-guided GPi-DBS lead placement in PD patients was associated with significant improvement in clinical outcomes, comparable to those observed following MER-guided DBS lead placement. Furthermore, iMRI-guided DBS implantation produced a similar safety profile to that of the MER-guided procedure. As such, iMRI guidance is an alternative to MER guidance for patients undergoing GPi-DBS implantation for PD.

Deep Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Targeting the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is becoming a prevalent disease in the elderly population. Past decades have witnessed the development of drug therapies with varying targets. However, all drugs with a single molecular target fail to reverse or ameliorate AD progression, which ultimately results in cortical and subcortical network dysregulation. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proven effective for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and other neurological diseases. As such, DBS has also been gradually acknowledged as a potential therapy for AD. The current review focuses on DBS of the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM). As a critical component of the cerebral cholinergic system and the Papez circuit in the basal ganglia, the NBM plays an indispensable role in the subcortical regulation of memory, attention, and arousal state, which makes the NBM a promising target for modulation of neural network dysfunction and AD treatment. We summarized the intricate projection relations and functionality of the NBM, current approaches for stereotactic localization and evaluation of the NBM, and the therapeutic effects of NBM-DBS both in patients and animal models. Furthermore, the current shortcomings of NBM-DBS, such as variations in cortical blood flow, increased temperature in the target area, and stimulation-related neural damage, were presented.

Accuracy and Workflow Improvements for Responsive Neurostimulation Hippocampal Depth Electrode Placement Using Robotic Stereotaxy

Background: Robotic stereotaxy is increasingly common in epilepsy surgery for the implantation of stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) electrodes for intracranial seizure monitoring. The use of robots is also gaining popularity for permanent stereotactic lead implantation applications such as in deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) procedures.

Objective: We describe the evolution of our robotic stereotactic implantation technique for placement of occipital-approach hippocampal RNS depth leads.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 10 consecutive patients who underwent robotic RNS hippocampal depth electrode implantation. Accuracy of depth lead implantation was measured by registering intraoperative post-implantation fluoroscopic CT images and post-operative CT scans with the stereotactic plan to measure implantation accuracy. Seizure data were also collected from the RNS devices and analyzed to obtain initial seizure control outcome estimates.

Results: Ten patients underwent occipital-approach hippocampal RNS depth electrode placement for medically refractory epilepsy. A total of 18 depth electrodes were included in the analysis. Six patients (10 electrodes) were implanted in the supine position, with mean target radial error of 1.9 ± 0.9 mm (mean ± SD). Four patients (8 electrodes) were implanted in the prone position, with mean radial error of 0.8 ± 0.3 mm. The radial error was significantly smaller when electrodes were implanted in the prone position compared to the supine position (p = 0.002). Early results (median follow-up time 7.4 months) demonstrate mean seizure frequency reduction of 26% (n = 8), with 37.5% achieving ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency as measured by RNS long episode counts.

Conclusion: Prone positioning for robotic implantation of occipital-approach hippocampal RNS depth electrodes led to lower radial target error compared to supine positioning. The robotic platform offers a number of workflow advantages over traditional frame-based approaches, including parallel rather than serial operation in a bilateral case, decreased concern regarding human error in setting frame coordinates, and surgeon comfort.

O-Arm Stereotactic Imaging in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Workflow: A Utility and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is an established treatment for movement disorders. Advances in neuroimaging techniques have resulted in improved targeting accuracy that may improve clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using the Medtronic O-arm device for the acquisition of intraoperative stereotactic imaging, targeting, and localization of DBS electrodes compared with standard stereotactic MRI or computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Patients were recruited prospectively into the study. Routine frame-based stereotactic DBS surgery was performed. Intraoperative imaging was used to facilitate and verify the accurate placement of the intracranial electrodes. The acquisition of coordinates and verification of the position of the electrodes using the O-arm were evaluated and compared with conventional stereotactic MRI or CT. Additionally, a systematic review of the literature on the use of intraoperative imaging in DBS surgery was performed.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included. The indications for DBS surgery were dystonia, Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and epilepsy. The globus pallidus internus was the most commonly targeted region (43.7%), followed by the subthalamic nucleus (35%). Stereotactic O-arm imaging reduced the overall surgical time by 68 min, reduced the length of time of acquisition of stereotactic images by 77%, reduced patient exposure to ionizing radiation by 24.2%, significantly reduced operating room (OR) costs per procedure by 31%, and increased the OR and neuroradiology suite availability.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the O-arm in DBS surgery workflow significantly reduced the duration of image acquisition, the exposure to ionizing radiation, and costs when compared with standard stereotactic MRI or CT, without reducing accuracy.

The Medial Subthalamic Nucleus Border as a New Anatomical Reference in Stereotactic Neurosurgery for Parkinson's Disease

INTRODUCTION

The intersection of Bejjani's line with the well-delineated medial subthalamic nucleus (STN) border on MRI has recently been proposed as an individualized reference in subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD). We, therefore, aimed to investigate the applicability across centers of the medial STN border as a patient-specific reference point in STN DBS for PD and explore anatomical variability between left and right mesencephalic area within patients. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate a recently defined theoretic stimulation "hotspot" in a different center.

METHODS

Preoperative 3-Tesla T2 and susceptibility-weighted images (SWI) were used to identify the intersection of Bejjani's line with the medial STN border in left and right mesencephalic area. The average stereotactic coordinates of the center of stimulation relative to the medial STN border were compared with the predefined theoretic stimulation "hotspot."

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients provided 108 stereotactic coordinates of medial STN borders on both sequences. Significant difference in means was found in the Y-(anteroposterior) and Z-(dorsoventral) directions (T2 vs. SWI; p < 0.001). Mean coordinates in the Y-(anteroposterior) direction differed significantly between left and right mesencephalic area (T2: p < 0.001; SWI: p = 0.021). Sixty-six DBS leads were placed in 36 patients that had finished stimulation programming, and the average stereotactic coordinates of the center of stimulation relative to the medial STN border on T2 sequences were 3.1 mm lateral, 0.7 mm anterior, and 1.8 mm superior, in proximity of the predefined theoretic stimulation "hotspot."

CONCLUSION

The medial STN border is applicable across centers as a reference point for STN DBS surgery for PD and seems suitable in order to account for interindividual and intraindividual anatomical variability if one is aware of the discrepancies between T2-weighted imaging and SWI.

Clinical outcomes of pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonia implanted using intraoperative MRI

OBJECTIVE

Lead placement for deep brain stimulation (DBS) using intraoperative MRI (iMRI) relies solely on real-time intraoperative neuroimaging to guide electrode placement, without microelectrode recording (MER) or electrical stimulation. There is limited information, however, on outcomes after iMRI-guided DBS for dystonia. The authors evaluated clinical outcomes and targeting accuracy in patients with dystonia who underwent lead placement using an iMRI targeting platform.

METHODS

Patients with dystonia undergoing iMRI-guided lead placement in the globus pallidus pars internus (GPi) were identified. Patients with a prior ablative or MER-guided procedure were excluded from clinical outcomes analysis. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores and Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Other measures analyzed include lead accuracy, complications/adverse events, and stimulation parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 60 leads were implanted in 30 patients. Stereotactic lead accuracy in the axial plane was 0.93 ± 0.12 mm from the intended target. Nineteen patients (idiopathic focal, n = 7; idiopathic segmental, n = 5; DYT1, n = 1; tardive, n = 2; other secondary, n = 4) were included in clinical outcomes analysis. The mean improvement in BFMDRS score was 51.9% ± 9.7% at 6 months and 63.4% ± 8.0% at 1 year. TWSTRS scores in patients with predominant cervical dystonia (n = 13) improved by 53.3% ± 10.5% at 6 months and 67.6% ± 9.0% at 1 year. Serious complications occurred in 6 patients (20%), involving 8 of 60 implanted leads (13.3%). The rate of serious complications across all patients undergoing iMRI-guided DBS at the authors' institution was further reviewed, including an additional 53 patients undergoing GPi-DBS for Parkinson disease. In this expanded cohort, serious complications occurred in 11 patients (13.3%) involving 15 leads (10.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative MRI-guided lead placement in patients with dystonia showed improvement in clinical outcomes comparable to previously reported results using awake MER-guided lead placement. The accuracy of lead placement was high, and the procedure was well tolerated in the majority of patients. However, a number of patients experienced serious adverse events that were attributable to the introduction of a novel technique into a busy neurosurgical practice, and which led to the revision of protocols, product inserts, and on-site training.

Frameless Robot-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: An Initial Experience

BACKGROUND

Modern robotic-assist surgical systems have revolutionized stereotaxy for a variety of procedures by increasing operative efficiency while preserving and even improving accuracy and safety. However, experience with robotic systems in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To present an initial series of DBS surgery performed utilizing a frameless robotic solution for image-guided stereotaxy, and report on operative efficiency, stereotactic accuracy, and complications.

METHODS

This study included the initial 20 consecutive patients undergoing bilateral robot-assisted DBS. The prior 20 nonrobotic, frameless cohort of DBS cases was sampled as a baseline historic control. For both cohorts, patient demographic and clinical data were collected including postoperative complications. Intraoperative duration and number of Microelectrode recording (MER) and final lead passes were recorded. For the robot-assisted cohort, 2D radial errors were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean case times (total operating room, anesthesia, and operative times) were all significantly decreased in the robot-assisted cohort (all P-values < .02) compared to frameless DBS. When looking at trends in case times, operative efficiency improved over time in the robot-assisted cohort across all time assessment points. Mean radial error in the robot-assisted cohort was 1.40 ± 0.11 mm, and mean depth error was 1.05 ± 0.18 mm. There was a significant decrease in the average number of MER passes in the robot-assisted cohort (1.05) compared to the nonrobotic cohort (1.45, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of application of frameless robotic-assistance with the Mazor Renaissance platform (Mazor Robotics Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) for DBS surgery, and our findings reveal that an initial experience is safe and can have a positive impact on operative efficiency, accuracy, and safety.

An Integrated Robotic System for MRI-Guided Neuroablation: Preclinical Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of brain tumors requires high precision in order to ensure sufficient treatment while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. Ablation of such tumors using needle-based therapeutic ultrasound (NBTU) under real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can fulfill this need. However, the constrained space and strong magnetic field in the MRI bore restricts patient access limiting precise placement of the NBTU ablation tool. A surgical robot compatible with use inside the bore of an MRI scanner can alleviate these challenges.

METHODS

We present preclinical trials of a robotic system for NBTU ablation of brain tumors under real-time MRI guidance. The system comprises of an updated robotic manipulator and corresponding control electronics, the NBTU ablation system and applications for planning, navigation and monitoring of the system.

RESULTS

The robotic system had a mean translational and rotational accuracy of 1.39  ± 0.64 mm and 1.27 [Formula: see text] in gelatin phantoms and 3.13  ± 1.41 mm and 5.58 [Formula: see text] in 10 porcine trials while causing a maximum reduction in signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 10.3%.

CONCLUSION

The integrated robotic system can place NBTU ablator at a desired target location in porcine brain and monitor the ablation in realtime via magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI).

SIGNIFICANCE

Further optimization of this system could result in a clinically viable system for use in human trials for various diagnostic or therapeutic neurosurgical interventions.

Methodological Considerations for Neuroimaging in Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson's Disease Patients

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus is a neurosurgical intervention for Parkinson's disease patients who no longer appropriately respond to drug treatments. A small fraction of patients will fail to respond to DBS, develop psychiatric and cognitive side-effects, or incur surgery-related complications such as infections and hemorrhagic events. In these cases, DBS may require recalibration, reimplantation, or removal. These negative responses to treatment can partly be attributed to suboptimal pre-operative planning procedures via direct targeting through low-field and low-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). One solution for increasing the success and efficacy of DBS is to optimize preoperative planning procedures via sophisticated neuroimaging techniques such as high-resolution MRI and higher field strengths to improve visualization of DBS targets and vasculature. We discuss targeting approaches, MRI acquisition, parameters, and post-acquisition analyses. Additionally, we highlight a number of approaches including the use of ultra-high field (UHF) MRI to overcome limitations of standard settings. There is a trade-off between spatial resolution, motion artifacts, and acquisition time, which could potentially be dissolved through the use of UHF-MRI. Image registration, correction, and post-processing techniques may require combined expertise of traditional radiologists, clinicians, and fundamental researchers. The optimization of pre-operative planning with MRI can therefore be best achieved through direct collaboration between researchers and clinicians.

Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation under General Anesthesia: Literature Review and Single Center Experience

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Traditionally, STN DBS for PD is performed by using microelectrode recording (MER) and/or intraoperative macrostimulation under local anesthesia (LA). However, many patients cannot tolerate the long operation time under LA without medication. In addition, it cannot be even be performed on PD patients with poor physical and neurological condition. Recently, it has been reported that STN DBS under general anesthesia (GA) can be successfully performed due to the feasible MER under GA, as well as the technical advancement in direct targeting and intraoperative imaging. The authors reviewed the previously published literature on STN DBS under GA using intraoperative imaging and MER, focused on discussing the technique, clinical outcome, and the complication, as well as introducing our single-center experience. Based on the reports of previously published studies and ours, GA did not interfere with the MER signal from STN. STN DBS under GA without intraoperative stimulation shows similar or better clinical outcome without any additional complication compared to STN DBS under LA. Long-term follow-up with a large number of the patients would be necessary to validate the safety and efficacy of STN DBS under GA.

Comparison of Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Fluoroscopy With Standard Computed Tomography for Stereotactic Frame Registration

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional fluoroscopy via the O-arm (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) has been validated for intraoperative confirmation of successful lead placement in stereotactic electrode implantation. However, its role in registration and targeting has not yet been studied. After frame placement, many stereotactic neurosurgeons obtain a computed tomography (CT) scan and merge it with a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan to generate planning coordinates; potential disadvantages of this practice include increased procedure time and limited scanner availability.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the second-generation O-arm (O2) can be used in lieu of a traditional CT scan to obtain accurate frame-registration scans.

METHODS

In 7 patients, a postframe placement CT scan was merged with preoperative MRI and used to generate lead implantation coordinates. After implantation, the fiducial box was again placed on the patient to obtain an O2 confirmation scan. Vector, scalar, and Euclidean differences between analogous X, Y, and Z coordinates from fused O2/MRI and CT/MRI scans were calculated for 33 electrode target coordinates across 7 patients.

RESULTS

Marginal means of difference for vector (X = -0.079 ± 0.099 mm; Y = -0.076 ± 0.134 mm; Z = -0.267 ± 0.318 mm), scalar (X = -0.146 ± 0.160 mm; Y = -0.306 ± 0.106 mm; Z = 0.339 ± 0.407 mm), and Euclidean differences (0.886 ± 0.190 mm) remained within the predefined equivalence margin differences of -2 mm and 2 mm.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that O2 may emerge as a viable alternative to the traditional CT scanner for generating planning coordinates. Adopting the O2 as a perioperative tool may offer reduced transport risks, decreased anesthesia time, and greater surgical efficiency.

Technical note: accuracy and precision in stereotactic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

While multiple trials have employed stereotactic stem cell transplantation, injection techniques have received little critical attention. Precise cell delivery is critical for certain applications, particularly when targeting deep nuclei.

METHODS

Ten patients with a history of ischemic stroke underwent CT-guided stem cell transplantation. Cells were delivered along 3 tracts adjacent to the infarcted area. Intraoperative air deposits and postoperative T2-weighted MRI fluid signals were mapped in relation to calculated targets.

RESULTS

The deepest air deposit was found 4.5 ± 1.0 mm (mean ± 2 SEM) from target. The apex of the T2-hyperintense tract was found 2.8 ± 0.8 mm from target. On average, air pockets were found anterior (1.2 ± 1.1 mm, p = 0.04) and superior (2.4 ± 1.0 mm, p < 0.001) to the target; no directional bias was noted for the apex of the T2-hyperintense tract. Location and distribution of air deposits were variable and were affected by the relationship of cannula trajectory to stroke cavity.

CONCLUSIONS

Precise stereotactic cell transplantation is a little-studied technical challenge. Reflux of cell suspension and air, and the structure of the injection tract affect delivery of cell suspensions. Intraoperative CT allows assessment of delivery and potential trajectory correction.

Stereotactic accuracy and frame mounting: A phantom study

Background:

Frame mounting is considered one of the most critical steps in stereotactic neurosurgery. In routine clinical practice, the aim is to mount the frame as symmetrical as possible, parallel to Reid’s line. However, sometimes, the frame is mounted asymmetrically often due to patient-related reasons.

Methods:

In this study, we addressed the question whether an asymmetrically mounted frame influences the accuracy of stereotactic electrode implantation. A Citrullus lanatus was used for this study. After a magnetic resonance imaging scan, symmetric and asymmetric mounting of the frame, which could occur in clinical scenarios, was performed with computed tomography (CT). Three different stereotactic software packages were used to analyze the results. In addition, manual calculations were performed by two different observers.

Results:

Our results show that an asymmetrically mounted frame (deviated, tilted, or rotated) does not affect the accuracy in the mediolateral axis (X-coordinate) or the anteroposterior axis (Y-coordinate). However, it can lead to a clinically relevant error in the superoinferior axis (Z-coordinate). This error was largest with manual calculations.

Conclusion:

These results suggest that asymmetrical frame mounting can lead to stereotactic inaccuracy in the superoinferior axis (Z coordinate).

Accuracy in Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Analysis of Sterotactic Error in Overlapping and Non-Overlapping Surgical Cases

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons utilize assistants to perform procedures in more than one operating room at a given time using a practice known as overlapping surgery. Debate has continued as to whether overlapping surgery improves the efficiency and access to care or risks patient safety and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine effects of overlapping surgery in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of overlapping and non-overlapping cases, we evaluated stereotactic accuracy, operative duration, length of hospital stay, and the presence of hemorrhage, wound-related complications, and hardware-related complications requiring revision in adults with movement disorders undergoing DBS.

RESULTS

Of 324 cases, 141 (43.5%) were overlapping and 183 (56.5%) non-overlapping. Stereotactic error, number of brain penetrations, and postoperative length of hospitalization did not differ significantly (p ≥ 0.08) between the overlapping and non-overlapping groups. Mean operative duration was significantly longer for overlapping (81/141 [57.4%], 189.5 ± 10.8 min) than for non-overlapping cases (79/183 [43.2%], 169.9 ± 7.6 min; p = 0.004). There were no differences in rates of wound-related complications or hemorrhages, but overlapping cases had a significantly higher rate of hardware-related complications requiring revision (7/141 [5.0%] vs. 0/183 [0%]; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Overlapping and non-overlapping cases had comparable DBS lead placement accuracy. Overlapping cases had a longer operative duration and had a higher rate of hardware-related complications requiring revision.

Electrode Placement Accuracy in Robot-Assisted Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) involves the implantation of electrodes into specific central brain structures for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Image guidance and robot-assisted techniques have been developed to assist in the accuracy of electrode placement. Traditional DBS is performed with the patient awake and utilizes microelectrode recording for feedback, which yields lengthy operating room times. Asleep DBS procedures use imaging techniques to verify electrode placement. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the validity of an asleep robot-assisted DBS procedure that utilizes intraoperative imaging techniques for precise electrode placement in a large, inclusive cohort. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to plan the surgical procedure for the 128 patients that underwent asleep DBS. During the surgery, robot assistance was used during the implantation of the electrodes. To verify electrode placement, intraoperative CT scans were fused with the preoperative MRIs. The mean radial error of all final electrode placements is 0.85 ± 0.38 mm. MRI-CT fusion error is 0.64 ± 0.40 mm. The average operating room time for bilateral and unilateral implantations are 139.3 ± 34.7 and 115.4 ± 42.1 min, respectively. This study shows the validity of the presented asleep DBS procedure using robot assistance and intraoperative CT verification for accurate electrode placement with shorter operating room times.

Hurdles in radiation planning for glioblastoma: Can delayed-contrast enhanced computed tomography be a potential solution?

OBJECTIVE

Conformal radiation is the standard of care in treatment of glioblastoma. Although co-registration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with early contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is recommended for target delineation by consensus guidelines, ground realities in developing countries often result in availability of less-than-ideal MR sequences for treatment planning. Purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of incorporation of delayed-CECT sequences for radiation planning in glioblastomas, as an adjunct or alternative to MRI.

METHODS

Case records of all patients of glioblastoma treated at our center between 2011 and 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Gross treatment volumes were delineated on T1 contrast MRI (m-GTV), early CECT (e-GTV) and delayed CECT (d-GTV); volumetric comparisons were made using repeated measures analysis of variance and pair-wise analysis.

RESULTS

Although 96% of registered patients underwent postoperative MRI, only 38% of them had desirable sequences suitable for co-registration. Median duration between acquisition of postoperative MRI and surgery was 45 days (range, 33-60), whereas that between MRI and treatment-planning CT was 5 days (range, 1-10). Statistically significant differences (P < 0.0001) were obtained between mean volumes of e-GTV (41.20cc), d-GTV (58.09cc) and m-GTV (60.52cc). Although the mean GTV increased by 46% between early CECT and MRI, the difference was only 4% between delayed CECT and MRI.

CONCLUSION

Delayed CECT is superior to early CECT for co-registration with MRI for target delineation, especially when available MR sequences are less-than-ideal for treatment planning, and can be considered as the most appropriate adjunct as well as an alternative to MRI, compared to early CECT.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Deep Brain Stimulation-A Prospective Noninferiority Study

Introduction

Clinical response to deep brain stimulation (DBS) strongly depends on the appropriate placement of the electrode in the targeted structure. Postoperative MRI is recognized as the gold standard to verify the DBS‐electrode position in relation to the intended anatomical target. However, intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) might be a feasible alternative to MRI.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective noninferiority study, we compared iCT with postoperative MRI (24‐72 hours after surgery) in 29 consecutive patients undergoing placement of 58 DBS electrodes. The primary outcome was defined as the difference in Euclidean distance between lead tip coordinates as determined on both imaging modalities, using the lead tip depicted on MRI as reference. Secondary outcomes were difference in radial error and depth, as well as difference in accuracy relative to target.

Results

The mean difference between the lead tips was 0.98 ± 0.49 mm (0.97 ± 0.47 mm for the left‐sided electrodes and 1.00 ± 0.53 mm for the right‐sided electrodes). The upper confidence interval (95% CI, 0.851 to 1.112) did not exceed the noninferiority margin established. The average radial error between lead tips was 0.74 ± 0.48 mm and the average depth error was determined to be 0.53 ± 0.40 mm. The linear Deming regression indicated a good agreement between both imaging modalities regarding accuracy relative to target.

Conclusions

Intraoperative CT is noninferior to MRI for the verification of the DBS‐electrode position. CT and MRI have their specific benefits, but both should be considered equally suitable for assessing accuracy.