Testing single/combined clinical categories on 5110 Italian patients with developmental phenotypes to improve array-based detection rate

12q21 Interstitial Deletions: Seven New Syndromic Cases Detected by Array-CGH and Review of the Literature

Interstitial deletions of the long arm of chromosome 12 are rare, with a dozen patients carrying a deletion in 12q21 being reported. Recently a critical region (CR) has been delimited and could be responsible for the more commonly described clinical features, such as developmental delay/intellectual disability, congenital genitourinary and brain malformations. Other, less frequent, clinical signs do not seem to be correlated to the proposed CR. We present seven new patients harboring non-recurrent deletions ranging from 1 to 18.5 Mb differentially scattered across 12q21. Alongside more common clinical signs, some patients have rarer features such as heart defects, hearing loss, hypotonia and dysmorphisms. The correlation of haploinsufficiency of genes outside the CR to specific signs contributes to our knowledge of the effect of the deletion of this gene-poor region of chromosome 12q. This work underlines the still important role of copy number variations in the diagnostic setting of syndromic patients and the positive reflection on management and family genetic counseling.

Chromosomal microarray in postnatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies and neurodevelopmental disorders in Serbian patients

Background

Array‐based genomic analysis is a gold standard for the detection of copy number variations (CNVs) as an important source of benign as well as pathogenic variations in humans. The introduction of chromosomal microarray (CMA) has led to a significant leap in diagnostics of genetically caused congenital malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders, with an average diagnostic yield of 15%. Here, we present our experience from a single laboratory perspective in four years’ postnatal clinical CMA application.

Methods

DNA samples of 430 patients with congenital anomalies and/or neurodevelopmental disorders were analyzed by comparative genome hybridization using oligonucleotide‐based microarray platforms. Interpretation of detected CNVs was performed according to current guidelines. The detection rate (DR) of clinically significant findings (pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs) was calculated for the whole cohort and isolated or combined phenotypic categories.

Results

A total of 140 non‐benign CNVs were detected in 113/430 patients (26.5%). In 70 patients at least one CNV was considered clinically significant thus reaching a diagnostic yield of 16.3%. The more complex the phenotype, including developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID) as a prevailing feature, the higher the DR of clinically significant CNVs is obtained. Isolated congenital anomalies had the lowest, while the “dysmorphism plus” category had the highest diagnostic yield.

Conclusion

In our study, CMA proved to be a very useful method in the diagnosis of genetically caused congenital anomalies and neurodevelopmental disorders. DD/ID and dysmorphism stand out as important phenotypic features that significantly increase the diagnostic yield of the analysis.

8p23.2-pter Microdeletions: Seven New Cases Narrowing the Candidate Region and Review of the Literature

To date only five patients with 8p23.2-pter microdeletions manifesting a mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment and/or developmental delay, dysmorphisms and neurobehavioral issues were reported. The smallest microdeletion described by Wu in 2010 suggested a critical region (CR) of 2.1 Mb including several genes, out of which FBXO25, DLGAP2, CLN8, ARHGEF10 and MYOM2 are the main candidates. Here we present seven additional patients with 8p23.2-pter microdeletions, ranging from 71.79 kb to 4.55 Mb. The review of five previously reported and nine Decipher patients confirmed the association of the CR with a variable clinical phenotype characterized by intellectual disability/developmental delay, including language and speech delay and/or motor impairment, behavioral anomalies, autism spectrum disorder, dysmorphisms, microcephaly, fingers/toes anomalies and epilepsy. Genotype analysis allowed to narrow down the 8p23.3 candidate region which includes only DLGAP2, CLN8 and ARHGEF10 genes, accounting for the main signs of the broad clinical phenotype associated to 8p23.2-pter microdeletions. This region is more restricted compared to the previously proposed CR. Overall, our data favor the hypothesis that DLGAP2 is the actual strongest candidate for neurodevelopmental/behavioral phenotypes. Additional patients will be necessary to validate the pathogenic role of DLGAP2 and better define how the two contiguous genes, ARHGEF10 and CLN8, might contribute to the clinical phenotype.

Comparison of the diagnostic yield of aCGH and genome-wide sequencing across different neurodevelopmental disorders

Most consensus recommendations for the genetic diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) do not include the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) and are still based on chromosomal microarrays, such as comparative genomic hybridization array (aCGH). This study compares the diagnostic yield obtained by aCGH and clinical exome sequencing in NDD globally and its spectrum of disorders. To that end, 1412 patients clinically diagnosed with NDDs and studied with aCGH were classified into phenotype categories: global developmental delay/intellectual disability (GDD/ID); autism spectrum disorder (ASD); and other NDDs. These categories were further subclassified based on the most frequent accompanying signs and symptoms into isolated forms, forms with epilepsy; forms with micro/macrocephaly and syndromic forms. Two hundred and forty-five patients of the 1412 were subjected to clinical exome sequencing. Diagnostic yield of aCGH and clinical exome sequencing, expressed as the number of solved cases, was compared for each phenotype category and subcategory. Clinical exome sequencing was superior than aCGH for all cases except for isolated ASD, with no additional cases solved by NGS. Globally, clinical exome sequencing solved 20% of cases (versus 5.7% by aCGH) and the diagnostic yield was highest for all forms of GDD/ID and lowest for Other NDDs (7.1% versus 1.4% by aCGH) and ASD (6.1% versus 3% by aCGH). In the majority of cases, diagnostic yield was higher in the phenotype subcategories than in the mother category. These results suggest that NGS could be used as a first-tier test in the diagnostic algorithm of all NDDs followed by aCGH when necessary.

CNV profiles of Chinese pediatric patients with developmental disorders

PURPOSE

To examine the overall genomic copy-number variant (CNV) landscape of Chinese pediatric patients with developmental disorders.

METHODS

De-identified chromosomal microarray (CMA) data from 10,026 pediatric patients with developmental disorders were collected for re-evaluating the pathogenic CNV (pCNV) yields of different medical conditions and for comparing the frequency and phenotypic variability of genomic disorders between the Chinese and Western patient populations.

RESULTS

The overall yield of pCNVs in the Chinese pediatric patient cohort was 21.37%, with variable yields for different disorders. Yields of pCNVs were positively associated with phenotypic complexity and intellectual disability/developmental delay (ID/DD) comorbidity for most disorders. The genomic burden and pCNV yield in neurodevelopmental disorders supported a female protective effect. However, the stratification analysis revealed that it was seen only in nonsyndromic ID/DD, not in nonsyndromic autism spectrum disorders or seizure. Furthermore, 15 known genomic disorders showed significantly different frequencies in Chinese and Western patient cohorts, and profiles of referred clinical features for 15 known genomic disorders were also significantly different in the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

We defined the pCNV yields and profiles of the Chinese pediatric patients with different medical conditions and uncovered differences in the frequency and phenotypic diversity of genomic disorders between Chinese and Western patients.

Testing single/combined clinical categories on 5110 Italian patients with developmental phenotypes to improve array-based detection rate

Background

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is nowadays widely used in the diagnostic path of patients with clinical phenotypes. However, there is no ascertained evidence to date on how to assemble single/combined clinical categories of developmental phenotypic findings to improve the array‐based detection rate.

Methods

The Italian Society of Human Genetics coordinated a retrospective study which included CMA results of 5,110 Italian patients referred to 17 genetics laboratories for variable combined clinical phenotypes.

Results

Non‐polymorphic copy number variants (CNVs) were identified in 1512 patients (30%) and 615 (32%) present in 552 patients (11%) were classified as pathogenic. CNVs were analysed according to type, size, inheritance pattern, distribution among chromosomes, and association to known syndromes. In addition, the evaluation of the detection rate of clinical subgroups of patients allowed to associate dysmorphisms and/or congenital malformations combined with any other single clinical sign to an increased detection rate, whereas non‐syndromic neurodevelopmental signs and non‐syndromic congenital malformations to a decreased detection rate.

Conclusions

Our retrospective study resulted in confirming the high detection rate of CMA and indicated new clinical markers useful to optimize their inclusion in the diagnostic and rehabilitative path of patients with developmental phenotypes.