Multivariate analysis of factors influencing the functional recovery after finger replantation or revascularization

Single Digit Index Finger Amputation-To Replant or Not?

Background: Single index finger replantation is often listed as a contraindication due to its hindrance of hand function when replanted. Recent studies demonstrate comparable subjective and global functional outcomes for index flexor zone II finger replants versus revision amputations. We therefore sought to identify current opinions of plastic surgery trainees and staff treating single index finger zone II amputations including influential patient and injury characteristics. Methods: With the approval of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgery, a 17-question survey was sent via email to all listed members on 3 separate occasions. Participation was voluntary and survey responses were compiled and analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Results: Survey response rate was 38.5%. When asked whether the surgeon would replant a single index digit, flexor zone II, sharp amputation, 55.3% of respondents chose "yes," while 44.7% responded "no." Staff (51.5%) were less likely to replant a single index digit amputation. Likelihood of replant dropped substantially in crush (12.4%) and avulsion (17.1%) injury. Smoking was the most likely patient characteristic to change a surgeon's decision (61.9%). Poor range of motion (77.5%) and patient satisfaction (72.5%) were the most frequently listed reasons not to replant. Conclusion: Among Canadian plastic surgeons, there exists disagreement in how single index flexor zone II amputations should be managed. In review of the literature, these notions and previous teaching around replants highlight many inherent surgeon biases with regard to the merit and value of single digit replantation.

Indications for Replantation and Revascularization in the Hand

The indications for upper extremity replantation are fluid, and it has long been appreciated that they change with time. Traditional strong indications for replantation include hand, thumb, or multiple digit amputation in adults, and almost any amputation in a child. Patients often desire replantation of single nonthumb digits based on aesthetic preference and personal/cultural values. Replantation in these situations is acceptable and rewarding, but individual consideration of patient, injury, and circumstantial factors is critical to avoid patient morbidity and unsatisfactory outcomes.

The Effect of Patient Age on the Success Rate of Digital Replantation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and risk factors for failure after digital replantation in elderly patients, with a special focus on the effect of patient age on replantation success.

METHODS

Replantation patients older than 60 years were analyzed thoroughly to characterize outcomes and risk factors for failure in older patients. Survival rates of all age groups older than 20 years were then analyzed to determine the specific effect of patient age on replantation success. The clinical and functional outcomes and risk factors for failure were evaluated at a minimum 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 161 patients older than 60 years, 189 of 208 replanted digits survived completely (91 percent survival). The only factors predictive of failure were mechanism of injury and age. Excellent or good results (Chen criteria) were obtained in 58 percent of patients, and 94 percent of patients were completely or fairly satisfied. Analysis of all age groups older than 20 (1648 patients) demonstrated a significant increase in failure rate in those aged 70 years and older.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors demonstrated a high rate of digit replantation success in elderly patients. However, 70 years and older was identified as an important factor predicting replantation failure.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Pediatric hand and wrist injuries

In the last 40 years, childhood hand and wrist injuries have become progressively more common as children have become heavier and more active in high impact sports. The majority of children with such injuries do well, but treatment is not always straightforward. Distal radius fractures, scaphoid fractures, metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, nailbed injuries, and amputations are among the pediatric hand and wrist injuries most often seen by orthopedists. These are all discussed, with a focus on the most recent literature and areas of evolving controversy.

Great toe transplant versus thumb replant for isolated thumb amputation: critical analysis of functional outcome

BACKGROUND

Thumb replantation following thumb amputation is the standard of care. When replantation is impossible, microneurovascular great toe transplantation is a well-established option.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate functional outcome following isolated thumb replantation or great toe transplantation for thumb reconstruction. From 1974 to 1993, 384 thumb amputations were treated and 110 great toe-to-thumb transplantations were performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients with isolated thumb amputation had an 85% survival rate. Failed replants usually resulted from crushing or avulsing injuries. Function of replanted thumbs was better in sharp compared with crush/avulsion injuries. Forty-three isolated thumb reconstructions had a 93% success rate. Function was comparable with thumb replants from sharp injuries. Interphalangeal motion was significantly better in great toe transplants than in replanted thumbs of the crush/avulsion type.

CONCLUSIONS

Amputated thumbs should be replanted. When replantation is not possible or unsuccessful, a transplanted great toe functions as well as, or better than, a replanted thumb.

Human Shaped Thumb Bone Tissue Engineered by Hydrogel-β-Tricalciumphosphate/Poly-ε-Caprolactone Scaffolds and Magnetically Sorted Stem Cells

Traumatic amputation of a thumb with bone loss leaves a patient in severe disability. Reconstructive procedures are restricted by limited shape and have the disadvantage of severe donor-site morbidity. To overcome these limitations, we used a tissue engineering approach to create a distal thumb bone phalanx, combining magnetically sorted 133+ human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) suspended in successful tested hydrogels for bone formation and porous 3-dimensionally printed scaffolds (3DP) in the shape of a distal thumb bone phalanx. Collagen I and fibrin glue hydrogels with suspended hMSCs were first histologically evaluated in vitro for bone formation after 6 weeks. Then 3DP scaffolds, made from a mix of osteoinductive and -conductive beta-tricalciumphosphate (beta-TCP) and poly-epsilon-caprolactone (PCL), with hydrogels and suspended hMSCs, were implanted into nude mice subcutaneously for 15 weeks. Histologic evaluation, high-resolution volumetric CT (VCT) scanning, and biomechanical testing confirmed formation of bonelike tissue. Both hydrogels with CD 133+ hMSCs on 3DP scaffolds supported bone formation. Collagen I resulted in radiologically better bone formation. Bone tissue can be successfully tissue engineered with CD 133+ hMSCs, collagen I hydrogels, and porous 3DP beta-TCP/PCL scaffolds.

Macro- and microcirculatory assessment of cold sensitivity after traumatic finger amputation and microsurgical replantation

INTRODUCTION

Finger replantations after traumatic amputation are associated with good prognosis and acceptable functional results. However, cold sensitivity is a common and sometimes disabling sequelae after digital replantation. The exact causes of cold intolerance are still unclear; neural as well as vascular mechanisms have been discussed. We examined the macro- and microvascular performance of replanted fingers using high-resolution color-coded sonography for the assessment of skin vessel density of the fingertips as well as nailfold capillary microscopy and laser Doppler anemometry. Subsequently, we correlated these findings with the presence of cold sensitivity of the replanted digits.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients (mean age 45 years; range 19-72) with 40 traumatic finger amputations and microsurgical replantations were studied. The mean time interval between amputation and examination was 57.7 months (range 13-95). Macro- and microvascular examination consisted of electronic oscillograms of both arms, photoplethysmograms of all fingers before and after cold test, duplex ultrasound of the finger arteries, high-resolution color-coded sonography of the fingertips and nailfold capillary microscopy with laser Doppler anemometry.

RESULTS

Cold sensitivity was present in 33 (83%) of the 40 replanted fingers. Peripheral arterial disease of the upper extremity could be excluded as all oscillograms showed normal findings. A vasospastic reaction after cold test was documented in 74% (30 of 38) of the replanted fingers, compared to 24% (9 of 38) of the contralateral uninjured fingers. Raynaud's phenomenon was restricted to replanted fingers and occurred in 10 of 40 patients (25%). Compared with the contralateral fingertips, reduced skin vessel density was found in 27 of 36 (75%) replants. Nailfold capillary microscopy revealed uncharacteristic morphologic patterns. The capillary flow velocity was 0.28 +/- 0.12 mm/s in the replanted fingers and 0.48 +/- 0.23 mm/s in their unaffected counterparts (P < 0.001). Correlating these findings with the presence of cold intolerance, reduced skin vessel density in the fingertips was significantly different between cold-sensitive replants and those without cold sensitivity (P = 0.05). Reduced skin vessel density was not related to the extent of reconstruction of nerves (P = n.s.), arteries (P = n.s.) and veins (P = n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not confirm hypotheses that cold sensitivity after finger replantations is caused by macrovascular problems nor do they support assumptions of a primary capillary microcirculatory failure. Our findings of reduced vessel density point towards diminished thermoregulatory capacities in the fingertips of cold-sensitive replanted digits.

[Operative strategies for hand injuries in multiple trauma. A systematic review of the literature]

OBJECTIVE

Hand injuries are not life threatening but crucial in multiple trauma because of their long-term functional results. The goal of this systematic review was to derive recommendations for diagnostic and treatment procedures from a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

Articles on hand injuries in multiple trauma and articles on clinical trails for isolated hand injuries were systematically collected (MEDLINE, Cochrane, and hand searches) and classified into evidence levels (1 to 5 according to the Oxford system).

RESULTS

The special management of hand injuries in multiple trauma requires accurate diagnostic procedures, differentiated therapy strategies, and adequate timing. Depending on type and extent of the injury, there are substantial differences for primary or secondary operative treatment.

CONCLUSION

Hand injuries represent important lesions in multiple trauma. Due to the life-threatening situation they may be overlooked in the beginning of the treatment. Because of their long-term consequences for function and health-related quality of life, hand injuries require an early and accurate diagnosis and a differentiated treatment strategy.

Neurokutaner Insellappen nach Foucher

INTRODUCTION

The "Foucher" flap is a pedicled neurovascular island flap of the first dorsal metacarpal artery.

METHODS

From 1992 to 2000, thirty-three neurocutaneous island flaps from the dorsal aspect of the index finger (FDMCA flap) were performed for defect coverage and reconstruction of sensibility in the thumb.

RESULTS

Static 2-PD over the flap area averaged 10.8 mm (range 4-15), compared to 8.2 mm (4-15) over the dorsal aspect of the contralateral index finger. Response to the SW monofilaments showed no difference to normal skin or only diminished light touch in 76% (19/25) patients. Seventy-six percent (19/25) were able to return to their previous jobs or resume previous activities.

CONCLUSION

Based on negligible donor site morbidity of the flap and the good sensate quality and aesthetic appearance, the Foucher flap has become our first choice in defect coverage and restoration of sensibility of the thumb.

Restoration of thumb sensibility with the innervated first dorsal metacarpal artery island flap

PURPOSE

This study investigated the quality of sensibility from innervated first dorsal metacarpal artery (FDMCA) island flaps in younger and older patients and evaluated the donor site morbidity at the index finger.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with an innervated FDMCA island flap to restore sensibility of the thumb were divided into groups according to age (>50 or <50 years). Sensory recovery and cortical reorientation were tested with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, a calibrated 2-point discrimination tester, and needle prick testing. Donor site morbidity was evaluated for range of motion, aesthetic appearance, pain, and problems with injuries.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 48.3 years and the mean follow-up period was 3 years. The 14 patients older than 50 years had a static 2-point discrimination (s2-PD) of 10.9 mm compared with 10.8 mm of the 11 patients younger than 50 years. The average loss of s2-PD of the flap compared with the donor area averaged 2.7 mm in all patients. Complete cortical reorientation occurred in 7 patients older than 50 years and in 5 patients younger than 50 years. Total loss of range of motion of all donor finger joints was 14 degrees (4.4%) compared with the contralateral index finger. Twenty-two patients were satisfied with the result.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no age-related differences in the surgical results of the innervated FDMCA island flap and the donor site morbidity was negligible.

Secondary procedures following digital replantation and revascularisation

In this retrospective study, 79 digits of 55 patients received 102 secondary procedures following replantation. We divided the procedures into two groups, occurring before or after 2 months following replantation. The procedures in the early group were mainly for soft tissue coverage (92%), and those in that late group were mainly for tendon (67%) to improve function. Factors associated with higher incidence of early secondary procedures included multiple-finger injury, avulsion or degloving injury and level of injury proximal to zone III in finger replantation (p<0.05). However, younger patients and those with proximal level replantation in fingers had more late secondary procedures (p<0.05). Flexor tenolysis procedure significantly improved the digital function after replantation (p<0.05).

Rehabilitation process and functional results of patients with amputated fingers

Digit amputation is a physical and psychological trauma that can influence the daily living of a person. The rehabilitation of patients with digit amputation is a complex process and should take into consideration all influencing factors, such as the functional, emotional, social, and professional profile of the patient. This study was conducted to evaluate the functional level of patients with amputated fingers and to understand the factors that influence their rehabilitation. Fifty patients (42 male and 8 female with an age ranging from 7 to 84 years) who had digit amputation(s) between January of 1990 and December of 1998 at the level of the metacarpus or distal to it and who had at least 6 months of follow-up were examined. The patients were divided into three different study groups: patients with distal amputation were compared with patients who had proximal amputation, patients with one finger amputation were compared with patients who had multiple finger amputations, and patients who suffered finger amputations caused by work-related accidents were compared with those who suffered amputations caused by other incidents. In addition, the time lapse from the amputation was checked as an influencing factor for different functional levels. The results showed that patients with distal amputation reached a higher motor and sensory functional level than patients with proximal amputation. Patients with one-finger amputation reached higher motor, sensory, and activities of daily living functional levels than patients with multiple amputations, and the level of motor and sensory function of patients with finger amputations caused by work-related accidents was lower than that of patients who suffered amputations in other incidents. Time was proven to be an important factor in the process of motor and emotional recovery.