From experimental rat hindlimb to clinical face composite tissue allotransplantation: Historical background and current status

Evaluation of PLGA microspheres with triple regimen on long-term survival of vascularized composite allograft - an experimental study

Systemic immunosuppression is indispensable for vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). Daily administration of standard triple therapy regimen of tacrolimus (FK506), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroid has severe side effects and reduces the compliance of VCA recipients. To overcome these hurdles, FK506/MMF/prednisolone (PDNN) was loaded into PLGA microspheres (PGLA MS). A single injection of FK506/MMF/PDNN-PLGA MS significantly prolonged the survival time of allograft in a rat hind limb transplantation model with a median survival time (MST) of more than 150 days compared to 34.5 days in the group treated orally with FK506/MMF/PDNN and 11 days in the nontreatment allograft and MS control groups. Analysis of showed that FK506/MMF/PDNN-PLGA MS could maintain relatively higher plasma and tissue drug concentrations for a long time. Moreover, histopathology and flow cytometry of circulating mononuclear cells revealed significantly prolonged immunosuppression by the FK506/MMF/PDNN-PLGA MS compared with the orally given FK506/MMF/PDNN. In conclusion, a single injection of FK506/MMF/PDNN-PLGA MS may provide a new approach for long-term prevention of immune rejection in VCA.

Abdominal Wall Transplant Surgery

The evolution and success of intestinal and multi-visceral transplantation over the past 20 years have raised the issue of difficult or even impossible abdominal closure, a topic rarely encountered in other fields of transplantation. Different techniques have been proposed to address this topic. The choice depends on the transplant team's expertise and/or the availability of a plastic surgery service. Abdominal wall transplant is a type of composite tissue allograft that can be utilized to reconstitute the abdominal domains of patients who undergo intestinal transplant, and the results are encouraging. It is an effective option to achieve primary abdominal closure after intestinal transplant. In its full-thickness form, it may be useful for monitoring rejection or viability of visceral organs. Our aim is to review the role of abdominal wall transplant in achieving tension-free closure of the abdomen.

Composite tissue allotransplantation and dysregulation in tissue repair and regeneration: a role for mesenchymal stem cells

Vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation is a rapidly evolving area that has brought technological advances to the forefront of plastic surgery, hand surgery, and transplant biology. Composite tissue allografts (CTAs) may have profound functional, esthetic, and psychological benefits, but carry with them the risks of life-long immunosuppression and the inadequate abilities to monitor and prevent rejection. Allografts may suffer from additional insults further weakening their overall benefits. Changes in local blood flow, lack of fully restored neurologic function, infection, inflammation with subsequent dysregulated regenerative activity, and paucity of appropriate growth factors may all be involved in reducing the potential of CTAs and therefore serve as new therapeutic targets to improve outcomes. Strategies involving minimized immunosuppression and pro-regenerative therapy may provide a greater path to optimizing long-term CTA function. One such strategy may include mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which can provide unique anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative effects. Insights gained from new studies with MSCs on composite allografts, advances in tissue regeneration reported in other MSC-based clinical studies, as well as consideration of newly described capacities of MSCs, may provide new regenerative based strategies for the care of CTAs.

Vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation--state of the art

Vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation is a viable treatment option for injuries and defects that involve multiple layers of functional tissue. In the past 15 yr, more than 150 vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) surgeries have been reported for various anatomic locations including - but not limited to - trachea, larynx, abdominal wall, face, and upper and lower extremities. VCA can achieve a level of esthetic and functional restoration that is currently unattainable using conventional reconstructive techniques. Although the risks of lifelong immunosuppression continue to be an important factor when evaluating the benefits of VCA, reported short- and long-term outcomes have been excellent, thus far. Acute rejections are common in the early post-operative period, and immunosuppression-related side effects have been manageable. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of VCA has proven successful. Reports of long-term graft losses have been rare, while several factors may play a role in the pathophysiology of chronic graft deterioration in VCA. Alternative approaches to immunosuppression such as cellular therapies and immunomodulation hold promise, although their role is so far not defined. Experimental protocols for VCA are currently being explored. Moving forward, it will be exciting to see whether VCA-specific aspects of allorecognition and immune responses will be able to help facilitate tolerance induction.

Animal models for basic and translational research in reconstructive transplantation

Reconstructive transplantation represents a bona fide option for select patients with devastating tissue loss, which could better restore the appearance, anatomy, and function than any other conventional treatment currently available. Despite favorable outcomes, broad clinical application of reconstructive transplantation is limited by the potential side effects of chronic multidrug immunosuppression. Thus, any reconstructive measures to improve these non-life-threatening conditions must address a delicate balance of risks and benefits. Today, several exciting novel therapeutic strategies, such as the implementation of cellular therapies including bone marrow or stem cells that integrate the concepts of immune regulation with those of nerve regeneration, are on the horizon. The development of reliable and reproducible small and large animal models is essential for the study of the unique immunological and biological aspects of vascularized composite allografts and to translate such novel immunoregulatory and tolerance-inducing strategies and therapeutic concepts from the bench to bedside. This review provides an overview of the multitude of small and large animal models that have been particularly designed for basic and translational research related to reconstructive transplantation.

Immunology of vascularized composite allotransplantation: a primer for hand surgeons

Vascularized composite allotransplantation is a recent innovation in the fields of transplantation surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, and orthopedic surgery. The success of hand and face transplantation has been based on extensive experience in solid organ transplantation. Advances in understanding the immunology of transplantation have had a major role in achieving excellent results in this new field. The purpose of this article is to introduce the basics of human immunology (innate and adaptive systems) and the immunological basis of human transplantation (the importance of human leukocyte antigen, direct and indirect pathways of antigen recognition, the 3 signals for T-cell activation, and mechanisms and types of allograft rejection) and focus on the mode of action of immunosuppressive drugs that have evolved as the mechanisms and pathways for rejection have been defined through research. This includes recent studies involving the use of costimulatory blockade, regulatory T cells, and tolerance induction that have resulted from research in understanding the mechanisms of immune recognition and function.

Mitomycin-C-treated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) prolong allograft survival in composite tissue allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) was introduced as a potential treatment for complex reconstructive procedures and has become a clinical reality. Hand and face transplantation, the most widely recognized forms of CTA, have intensified immunological research in this emerging field of transplantation. Mitomycin C (MMC) is an alkylating agent that suppresses allogeneic T-cell responses. MMC-treated dendritic cells/PBMCs have been shown to induce donor-specific tolerance in solid organ allograft transplantations.

METHODS

Fully mismatched rats were used as hind limb donors [Lewis (RT1(1))] and recipients [Brown-Norway (RT1(n))]. Fifty-five allogeneic hind limb transplantations were accomplished in six groups. Group A (n = 10) received donor-derived MMC-treated PBMCs on transplantation day. Group B (n = 10) rats received no immunosuppression, group C (n = 10) received FK506 and prednisolon, group D consisted in isograft transplantation without immunosuppression, group E (n = 10) received non-treated PBMCs, and group F (n = 5) received PBS without any donor-derived cells. Rejection was assessed clinically and histologically.

RESULTS

In group A, the survival times of the allografts were prolonged to an average of 8.0 d. Rejection was significantly delayed compared with the averages of the corresponding control groups B, E, and F (5.5, 5.9, and 5.8 d). No rejection was seen in control groups C and D.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that MMC-treated donor PBMCs significantly prolong allograft survival when administered systemically on the day of transplantation. However, the immunomodulatory effect is relatively modest with further research being required to clarify dose-effect relations, cell characteristics, and an optimized mechanism and timing for cell application.

Immunomodulatory effects of pre-irradiated extremity allograft in the rodent model

Allogeneic human hand transplantation requires combination immunotherapy to maintain viability. Immunosuppression will be lifelong, with doses as high or higher than those required for solid organ allotransplantation. The risks associated with lifelong immunosuppression are unacceptable, particularly for younger transplant patients. It therefore becomes imperative to explore ways to reduce or eliminate the requirement for immunosuppression. Reconstructive surgery should consider, to a large extent, graft pre-treatment as a strategy for the transplantation of vascularised limb tissue allografts with reduced requirement for immunosuppression. In the clinical setting of composite tissue allograft (CTA), the graft is always procured from a cadaveric donor. Therefore, only a short time is available between harvesting the graft from the donor and transplanting into the recipient. This period provides the only opportunity to manipulate the CTA. Quite a few studies, however, have so far investigated donor pre-treatment and pre-transplant modification of the extremity allograft. Work from our group and others has demonstrated that removal of allogeneic bone marrow in the limb graft by irradiation and its rapid reconstitution with recipient marrow cells can significantly prolong the survival of limb allografts in the absence of immunosuppression. In the current work, we review these studies and discuss the immunomodulatory effects on the extremity allograft.

The world's experience with facial transplantation: what have we learned thus far?

The objective of this review article is to summarize the published details and media citations for all seven face transplants performed to date to point out deficiencies in those reports so as to provide the basis for examining where the field of face transplantation stands, and to act as a stimulus to enhance the quality of future reports and functional outcomes. Overall long-term function of facial alloflaps has been reported satisfactorily in all seven cases. Sensory recovery ranges between 3 and 6 months, and acceptable motor recovery ranges between 9 and 12 months. The risks and benefits of facial composite tissue allotransplantation, which involves mandatory lifelong immunosuppression analogous to kidney transplants, should be deliberated by each institution's multidisciplinary face transplant team. Face transplantation has been shown thus far to be a viable option in some patients suffering severe facial deficits which are not amenable to modern-day reconstructive technique.

Overview of guidelines for establishing a face transplant program: a work in progress

Since 2005, nine face transplants have been performed in four countries: France, the United States (US), China and Spain. These encouraging short-term outcomes, with the longest survivor approaching 5 years, have led to an increased interest in establishing face transplant programs worldwide. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to facilitate the dissemination of relevant details as per our experience in an effort to assist those medical centers interested in establishing a face transplant program. In this article, we address the logistical challenges involved with face transplantation; including essential program requirements, protocol details, face transplant team assembly, project funding, the organ procurement organization and the coroner. It must be emphasized that face transplantation is still experimental and its therapeutic value remains to be validated. All surgical teams pursuing this endeavor must dedicate an attention to detail and should accept a responsibility to publish their outcomes in a transparent manner in order to contribute to the international field. However, due to its inherent complexity, facial transplantation should only be performed by university-affiliated medical institutions capable of orchestrating a specialized multidisciplinary team with a long-term commitment to its success.

A new composite midface allotransplantation model with sensory and motor reinnervation

In this study, we extended application of face transplantation model in rat by incorporation of vascularized premaxilla, and nose with infraorbital and facial nerves for evaluation of allotransplanted sensory and motor nerve functional recovery. In group I (n = 3) the dissection technique is studied. In group II (n = 5) isotransplantations were performed. In group III (n = 5) allotransplantations were performed under Cyclosporin A monotherapy. Grafts; composed of nose, lower lip, and premaxilla; were dissected. Infraorbital nerve and facial nerve were included into the transplant. A heterotopic transplantation was performed to inguinal region of recipient. Nerve coaptations were performed between infraorbital-sapheneous nerve and facial-femoral nerve. CT scan, somatosensory-evoked potential testing (SSEP), motor-evoked potential testing (MEP), and microangiography were used for evaluation. All transplants survived indefinitely over 100 days. Microangiography showed preserved vascularization of the graft. Computed tomography revealed vital premaxillary bone segments. SSEP and MEP confirmed recovery of motor and sensory functions and latencies reached 67% of normal infraorbital nerve value and 70% of normal facial nerve value at 100 days post-transplant. We have introduced new midface transplant model of composite midface allograft with sensory and motor units. In this model, motor and sensory functional recovery was confirmed at 100 days post-transplant.

Maintenance of donor-specific chimerism despite osteopontin-associated bone fibrosis in a vascularized bone marrow transplantation model

BACKGROUND

The role of vascularized bone allografting is not established in plastic and reconstructive surgery. The authors evaluated the contribution by osteopontin to fibrosis of allografted bone in a vascularized bone marrow transplantation model across a major histocompatibility complex barrier.

METHODS

Thirty-six transplantations were performed between Brown Norway (RT1 n) donors and Lewis (RT1 l) recipients divided into three groups: group 1, isografts between Lewis rats (n = 12); group 2, allografts without treatment (n = 8); and group 3, allografts under a 7-day alphabeta-T-cell receptor/cyclosporine protocol (n = 16). Flow cytometry assessed the presence of chimerism for donor major histocompatibility complex class I (RT1 n) antigens. Immunostaining was used to determine osteopontin expression in grafted and recipient bone, and histologic examination was used to assess bone architecture.

RESULTS

Early engraftment of donor bone marrow cells (RT1 n) into the recipient bone marrow compartment was achieved at posttransplantation day 7. This corresponded with osteopontin expression restricted to the endosteum of trabecular bone and was associated with the preservation of hematopoietic cells within donor bone. Cell migration between donor and recipient bone marrow compartments was confirmed by the presence of recipient cells (RT1 l) within the allografted bone and donor-origin cells (RT1 n) within the recipient bone. At posttransplantation day 63, osteopontin expression within allografted bone was associated with allograft bone fibrosis and lack of hematopoietic properties. In contrast, the recipient's contralateral bone demonstrated a highly localized osteopontin expression pattern within the endosteum and active hematopoiesis with the presence of donor-specific (RT1 n) cells and correlated with chimerism maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that despite up-regulation of osteopontin expression and fibrosis of allografted bone, vascularized bone marrow transplantation resulted in efficient engraftment of donor cells into the recipient's bone marrow compartment, leading to chimerism maintenance.

A model for functional recovery and cortical reintegration after hemifacial composite tissue allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

The ability to achieve optimal functional recovery is important in both face and hand transplantation. The purpose of this study was to develop a functional rat hemifacial transplant model optimal for studying both functional outcome and cortical reintegration in composite tissue allotransplantation.

METHODS

Five syngeneic transplants with motor and sensory nerve appositions (group 1) and five syngeneic transplants without nerve appositions (group 2) were performed. Five allogeneic transplants were performed with motor and sensory nerve appositions (group 3). Lewis (RT1) rats were used for syngeneic transplants and Brown-Norway (RT1) donors and Lewis (RT1) recipients were used for allogeneic transplants. Allografts received cyclosporine A monotherapy. Functional recovery was assessed by recordings of nerve conduction velocity and cortical neural activity evoked by facial nerve and sensory (tactile) stimuli, respectively.

RESULTS

All animals in groups 1 and 3 showed evidence of motor function return on nerve conduction testing, whereas animals in group 2, which did not have nerve appositions, did not show electrical activity on electromyographic analysis (p < 0.001). All animals in groups 1 and 3 showed evidence of reafferentation on recording from the somatosensory cortex after whisker stimulation. Animals in group 2 did not show a cortical response on stimulation of the whiskers (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The authors have established a hemiface transplant model in the rat that has several modalities for the comprehensive study of motor and sensory recovery and cortical reintegration after composite tissue allotransplantation.

Science of composite tissue allotransplantation

The science of composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is rooted in progressive thinking by surgeons, fueled by innovative solutions, and aided by understanding the immunology of tolerance and rejection. These three factors have allowed CTA to progress from science fiction to science fact. Research using preclinical animal models has allowed an understanding of the antigenicity of complex tissue transplants and mechanisms to promote graft acceptance. As a result, translation to the clinic has shown that CTA is a viable treatment option well on the way of becoming a standard of care for those who have lost extremities and suffered large tissue defects. The field of CTA has been progressing exponentially over the past decade. Transplantation of hands, larynx, vascularized knee, trachea, face, and abdominal wall has been performed. Several important observations have emerged from translation to the clinic. Although it was predicted that rejection would pose a major limitation, this has not proven true. In fact, steroid-sparing protocols for immunosuppression that have been successfully used in renal transplantation are sufficient to prevent rejection of limbs. Although skin is highly antigenic when transplanted alone in animal models, when part of a CTA, it has not proven to be. Chronic rejection has not been conclusively demonstrated in hand transplant recipients and is difficult to induce in rodent models of CTA. This review focuses on the science of CTA, provides a snapshot of where we are in the clinic, and discusses prospects for the future to make the procedures even more widely available.

Long-term survival of limb allografts induced by pharmacologically conditioned, donor alloantigen-pulsed dendritic cells without maintenance immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

We showed recently that limb allograft survival could be enhanced by administration of alloantigen (Ag)-pulsed immature dendritic cells (DC) after transplantation. Since indefinite graft survival was not achieved, we have further modified the DC by pharmacologic (rapamycin; Rapa) conditioning and ascertained their influence on graft survival, without continued immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

We compared the ability of donor Ag-pulsed, Rapa-conditioned rat myeloid DC (Rapa DC) and control DC (CTR DC) to inhibit alloreactive T-cell responses after limb transplantation in antilymphocyte serum (ALS)-treated recipients given a short postoperative course of cyclosporine (CsA).

RESULTS

Both DC populations expressed similar levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II, CD40 and CD54, but Rapa DC expressed lower CD86. After toll-like receptor activation, both populations produced minimal interleukin (IL)-12p70, but Rapa DC secreted lower levels of IL-6 and IL-10. The capacity of DCs to stimulate T-cell proliferation in mixed leukocyte reactions was very low. Pulsing of the DC with donor Ag did not alter their phenotype or function. Interestingly, posttransplant administration of donor Ag-pulsed Rapa DC to rats given perioperative ALS and 21 days CsA significantly delayed graft rejection and promoted long-term (>125 days) graft survival. AlloAg-pulsed Rapa DC induced T-cell hyporesponsiveness and promoted the generation of IL-10-secreting CD4 T cells upon ex vivo challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

Infusion of donor Ag-pulsed, Rapa-conditioned DC after composite tissue transplantation can prevent rejection of the grafts, including skin, across a full MHC mismatch and in the absence of continued immunosuppressive therapy.

Outcomes 18 months after the first human partial face transplantation

BACKGROUND

We performed the first human partial face allograft on November 27, 2005. Here we report outcomes up to 18 months after transplantation.

METHODS

The postsurgical induction immunosuppression protocol included thymoglobulins combined with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Donor hematopoietic stem cells were infused on postoperative days 4 and 11. Sequential biopsy specimens were taken from a sentinel skin graft, the facial skin, and the oral mucosa. Functional progress was assessed by tests of sensory and motor function performed monthly. Psychological support was provided before and after transplantation.

RESULTS

Sensitivity to light touch, as assessed with the use of static monofilaments, and sensitivity to heat and cold had returned to normal at 6 months after transplantation. Motor recovery was slower, and labial contact allowing complete mouth closure was achieved at 10 months. Psychological acceptance of the graft progressed as function improved. Rejection episodes occurred on days 18 and 214 after transplantation and were reversed. A decrease in inulin clearance led to a change in immunosuppressive regimen from tacrolimus to sirolimus at 14 months. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy was introduced at 10 months to prevent recurrence of rejection. There have been no subsequent rejection episodes. At 18 months, the patient is satisfied with the aesthetic result.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient who underwent the first partial face transplantation, the functional and aesthetic results 18 months after transplantation are satisfactory.