Clinical application and outcome of the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) free flap for soft tissue reconstructions of the upper head and neck region in three patients

Outcomes of internal mammary artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review

This study aims to evaluate the functional and prognostic outcomes associated with the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap in various head and neck defect repairs, given the current lack of clarity on its effectiveness. We performed a systematic review of various databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect using keywords such as "Internal mammary artery perforator flap" and "IMAP." Screening and data extractions were performed by two individual reviewers. Articles were considered eligible if they included sufficient information on IMAP flap features, their applications in the head and neck, and outcomes. From 264 articles analyzed, 24 studies were included for qualitative analysis. Out of which, 125 patients who received internal mammary artery perforator flaps were included. Most of the patients, 103 (88%), received pedicled IMAP flaps, and 22 (12%) received IMAP free flaps. The second internal mammary artery (IMA) was favored as the single perforator (81.5%), with the combination of the first and second IMA being the primary choice for dual perforators (92.5%). IMAP flaps were predominantly single perforator flaps (65%), with 35% being dual perforator flaps. Among various applications, IMAP flaps are commonly employed in the reconstruction of neck defects (25.5%), pharyngocutaneous fistula repair (20.8%), and burn scar contracture restoration (8%). Only seven (5.6%) patients had flap complications, including venous congestion (1.6%), partial necrosis (1.6%), complete necrosis (1.6%), and incision dehiscence (0.8%). Donor sites were predominantly closed by the primary closure (92%). 3.2% of donor sites had minor complications. The average follow-up was 12.6 (IQR: 6-18) months. This systematic review highlights the effectiveness and safety of IMAP flaps in head and neck reconstruction, with positive outcomes and minimal complications.

Impact of internal mammary artery perforator propeller flap in neck resurfacing and fistula closure after salvage larynx cancer surgery: Our experience

BACKGROUND

Salvage total laryngectomy (TL) and laryngopharyngectomy (LP) after chemoradiotherapy may produce disfiguring defects with severe complications that require complex reconstructions.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and December 2018, we enrolled 25 patients who underwent internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap reconstruction after salvage TL or LP. We performed retrospective review of clinical charts to collect information such as history, timing of reconstruction, type of defect, follow-up, donor and recipient site complications, and overall flap survival (OFS) rate. Three years overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated.

RESULTS

The OFS rate was 95%. One partial flap necrosis was recorded. No donor-site complications were found. The mean follow-up was 18 months. Three years OS was 44%, RFS was 47%, and DSS was 54%.

CONCLUSIONS

IMAP flap appears to be safe, versatile, and easy to harvest, with minimal donor site morbidity. It is a reliable option in Head&Neck reconstruction, in salvage surgery as well.

Can previous diagnostic examinations prevent preoperative angiographic assessment of the internal mammary perforators for (micro)surgical use?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Preoperative assessment of the internal mammary artery perforating (IMAP) branches enhances IMAP-based reconstructive procedures. Conventionally, color-flow Doppler, selective catheter arteriography, or CT angiography is used for such assessment. We studied how often these examinations may be rendered superfluous by assessment of previously performed diagnostic examinations.

METHODS

A radiologist and a plastic surgeon jointly assessed whether information on the dominant IMAP could sufficiently be obtained from the thoracic CT scans of 12 head and neck cancer patients and 12 breast cancer patients, and from the mammary MRI of 12 breast cancer patients. Secondly, we retrospectively assessed in how many of the 10 patients who underwent an IMAP-flap head and neck reconstruction, and in how many of the 10 women who consecutively underwent a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap mammary reconstruction such previous diagnostic examinations were available and informative regarding the level of the dominant perforator.

RESULTS

All 24 CT scans and 11 of the 12 MRI scans sufficiently allowed assessment of the level of the dominant IMAP. Previous information had already been available in all 10 DIEP flap patients and 6 of the 10 IMAP-flap patients. The distribution of IMAP dominance over the intercostal levels on the scans differed from that found by cadaveric or intraoperative assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously performed diagnostic CT scans and MRI scans that included the parasternal region usually allow sufficient preoperative assessment of the internal mammary perforators for reconstructive procedures. We advocate re-assessment of such previous examinations before ordering additional angiography. Additionally, we suggest to include the parasternal region in diagnostic scans.

Dual perforator propeller internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap for soft-tissue defect of the contralateral clavicular area

The internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap represents the evolution from axially pedicled flaps (deltopectoral flap) to perforator flaps. Both flaps are typically used for neck and tracheostoma reconstruction in male patients. We present the case of a 68-year-old obese female patient with a right upper thoracic radionecrosis secondary to breast irradiation. Soft-tissue defect measured 12×18 cm. She also complained of left breast hypertrophy. Following radical debridement, a left IMAP flap extending from midline to the anterior axillary fold was raised, based on the second and fourth IMAP vessels. The flap was rotated 180° on its second and fourth perforators to cover the defect and the left breast was reshaped. The flap survived entirely and wound healing was uneventful. Ptosis and breast hypertrophy were corrected at the same time. The IMAP flap can be harvested all the way to the anterior axillary fold and used as a large propeller flap, which makes this flap suitable for contralateral thoracic reconstructions, even in female patients.