Comprehensive review of vascularized lymph node transfers for lymphedema: Outcomes and complications

Primary LYmphedema Multidisciplinary Approach in Patients Affected by Primary Lower Extremity Lymphedema

Background: Primary lymphedema is a chronic condition caused by a developmental abnormality of the lymphatic system, leading to its malfunction. Various surgical options, including physiologic and excisional procedures, have been proposed. The aim of this study was to present a comprehensive algorithm for the treatment of primary lower extremity lymphedema: the Primary LYmphedema Multidisciplinary Approach (P-LYMA). Methods: Nineteen patients were treated following the P-LYMA protocol. Patients underwent pre- and postoperative complex decongestive therapy (CDT). A variety of physiologic and excisional procedures were performed, either independently or in combination. The primary outcome was to assess the circumferential reduction rate (CRR). The Lymphedema Quality of Life Score (LeQOLiS), reduction in the number of cellulitis episodes, and complications were recorded. Results: The mean CRR was 73 ± 20% at twelve months postoperatively. The frequency of cellulitis episodes per year decreased from a mean of 1.9 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 0.4 ± 0.6 during follow-up. Two patients experienced minor complications. The mean hospitalization time was 5 days. Patients' quality of life, as measured by the LeQOLiS, significantly improved from 70.4 ± 12 preoperatively to 24 ± 14 at twelve months postoperatively. Conclusions: The P-LYMA algorithm maximizes surgical outcomes and improves the quality of life in patients with primary lymphedema. CDT is essential for optimizing results.

Pedicled SCIP-based vascularized lymphnode and lymphatic vessels transfer (VLNT and VLVT) for deep lymphatic system reconstruction and dead space obliteration after medial thigh sarcoma resection: A case report

Soft-tissue sarcomas represent a cohort of rare and heterogeneous malignant tumors that could affect various body parts, with a higher incidence in the lower extremity. When these tumors are surgically removed, both the superficial and deep lymphatic pathways could also be damaged and might require immediate reconstruction to prevent lymphatic complications. In the present report, we describe a case of a patient affected by a high-grade (G3) spindle cell pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma of the upper medial thigh. A 22 × 20 cm mass was removed with exposure of the deep femoral vessels and the great saphenous vein. After intraoperative indocyanine green lymphography, it was determined that the superficial lymphatic vessels were intact, but the deep lymphatic system was unavoidably damaged. As a reconstructive procedure, we performed a pedicled SCIP-based vascularized lymphatic vessel transfer and vascularized lymph node transfer to restore the deep lymphatic system and dead space obliteration. The procedure was successful, and no signs of lymphatic impairment were observed during the two-year follow-up period. We believe that this novel approach might be helpful in cases of large and profound defects that involve the deep lymphatic system. The combination of these two techniques could help restore deep lymph drainage, minimizing the risk of superficial system overload and lymphatic dysfunction. No other cases have been described so far employing the same approach. Considering the obtained results, this procedure might be worth further investigation.

Analysis of different outcome parameters and quality of life after different techniques of free vascularized lymph node transfer

OBJECTIVE

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has become an important surgical technique in the treatment of lymphedema. Considering the different available regions available for flap harvest, we aimed to analyze different donor sites for VLNT with respect to donor site morbidity, impact on limb volume, and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs).

METHODS

A single-center prospective study of all patients undergoing VLNT at the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery of the University Hospital Zurich between September 2016 and 2023 was conducted. Lymph nodes were harvested either from the omentum (gastroepiploic [GE]-VLNT), the lateral thoracic wall (LTW), or the superficial inguinal region (SI-VLNT). Volume measurements and PROMs were assessed preoperatively and at different postoperative intervals.

RESULTS

Overall, 70 patients with upper limb lymphedema (21%) or lower limb lymphedema (79%) with different lymphedema stages were included. There were 49 patients who underwent GE-VLNT, followed by LTW-VLNT (n = 16) and SI-VLNT (n = 5). Lymph node harvest from the SI was associated with a significantly higher frequency of seroma development. The average percentage volume loss related in comparison to the preoperative volume of the affected limb was 9% after GE-VLNT, 10% after LTW-VLNT, and 5% after SI-VLNT without a significant difference between the groups. PROMs revealed significant improvements for physical functioning, symptoms and psychological well-being, with no differences between the VLNT techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

VLNT leads to a significant improvement of quality of life and can decrease limb volume effectively, regardless of the selection of donor site. GE-VLNT has become our flap of choice owing to its low donor site morbidity and its properties that allow a double transplantation while avoiding a second donor site.

Personalizing Locoregional Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer in 2024: Tailoring Axillary Surgery, Escalating Lymphatic Surgery, and Implementing Evidence-Based Hypofractionated Radiotherapy

The management of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer is continually evolving. Recent data now support omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in most patients with metastases in up to two sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) during upfront surgery and those with residual isolated tumor cells after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). In the upfront surgery setting, ALND is still indicated, however, in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer or more than two positive SLNs and, after NACT, in case of residual micrometastases and macrometastases. Omission of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be considered in many postmenopausal patients with small luminal breast cancer, particularly when axillary ultrasound is negative. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently aiming at eliminating the remaining indications for ALND and also establishing omission of SLNB in a broader patient population. The movement to deescalate axillary staging is in part because of the association between ALND and lymphedema, which is swelling of an extremity because of lymphatic damage and obstructed lymphatic drainage. To reduce the risk of developing this condition, patients undergoing ALND can undergo reverse mapping of the axilla and immediate reconstruction or bypass of the lymphatics from the involved extremity. Decongestion and compression are the foundation of conservative treatment for established lymphedema, while lymphovenous bypass and lymph node transfer are surgical procedures to address the physiologic dysfunction. Radiotherapy is an essential component of breast locoregional therapy: more than three decades of radiation research has optimized treatment according to patient's risk of local recurrence while substantially reducing the number of treatment visits. High-quality RCTs have shown the efficacy and safety of hypofractionation-more than 2Gy radiation dose per treatment (fraction)-significantly reducing the burden of radiotherapy treatment for many patients with breast cancer. In 2024, guidelines recommend no more than 15-16 fractions for whole-breast and nodal radiotherapy, with some recommending five fractions for whole-breast radiotherapy. In addition, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) has been shown to be noninferior to sequential boost with regards to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence with similar or reduced long-term side effects, also reducing overall treatment length. Further RCTs are underway investigating other indications for five fractions, including SIB and regional node irradiation, such that, in future, it may be possible for the majority of breast radiotherapy patients to be treated with a 1-week course. This manuscript serves to outline the latest updates on axillary surgical staging, lymphatic surgery, and evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Characterization of Immune Cell Infiltration and Collagen Type III Disorganization in Human Secondary Lymphedema: A Case-control Study

Background

Secondary lymphedema (SL) affects 120 million people globally, posing a lifelong burden for up to 37% of cancer survivors. Chronic inflammation and progressive fibrosis are key drivers of SL, yet detailed characterization of immune cell subpopulations across lymphedema stages is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the immunologic profile of lymphedematous skin and its association with extracellular matrix changes, which could serve as clinical biomarkers or therapeutic targets.

Methods

This case-control study analyzed the skin from 36 patients with and without SL, using immunofluorescence to quantify T cells, B cells, macrophages, and their subpopulations. Collagen quantity and composition were examined using picrosirius red staining, and mast cell infiltration was assessed with toluidine blue staining. Early and late SL stages were compared to identify histomorphological and immunologic correlates of stage progression.

Results

We found a predominance of CD4+ T cells and mast cells in SL skin (1.4/mm² versus 1.0/mm², P < 0.01; 1.2/mm² versus 0.2/mm², P < 0.0001) and a higher ratio of collagen III to collagen I fibers (51.6% versus 75.0%, P < 0.001). M2 macrophages were more abundant in late-stage than in early-stage lymphedema (1.7/mm² versus 1.0/mm², P = 0.02).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated a shift toward CD4+ T cell and mast cell infiltration in SL skin, correlating with extracellular matrix disorganization and an altered collagen III/I ratio. These findings enhance our understanding of the cellular and morphological changes in SL, potentially guiding future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Distribution of Perigastric Station 4d Lymph Nodes in Vascularized Gastroepiploic Lymph Node Transfer: An Anatomic Study and Case Series

BACKGROUND

Vascularized gastroepiploic lymph node transfer (VGLNT) is a well-accepted surgical treatment for restoring physiological function in chronic lymphedema. However, the inclusion of substantial lymph nodes (LNs) in the flap remains uncertain. This study aimed to identify the anatomical basis for reliable flap harvest for VGLNT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The anatomy of perigastric station 4d LNs was studied in healthy cadavers (n = 15) and patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) (n = 27). The omentum was divided into three segments: proximal, middle, and distal from the origin of the right gastroepiploic vessels. The flap dimension, number, location, size of LNs, and caliber of the vessels were reviewed. Eight patients underwent VGLNT for upper/lower limb lymphedema.

RESULTS

The mean numbers of LNs in the proximal, middle, and distal segment were 2.5, 1.4, 0.5 in the cadavers, and 4.9, 2.7, 0.7 in the gastrectomy specimens, respectively. The proximal third included a significantly greater number of LNs than the distal third in the cadaveric (p = 0.024) and ECG (p = 0.016) specimens. A total of 95% of the LNs were located within proximal two-thirds of the flap from the vessel origin both in the cadavers (21.0 × 5.0 cm) and in the gastrectomy specimens (20 × 3.5 cm). In VGLNT, the transferred flap was 25.5 ± 6.9 × 4.1 + 0.7 cm in dimension, containing a mean number of 6.5 ± 1.9 LNs. At postoperative 6 months, the volumetric difference was significantly reduced by 22.8 ± 9.2% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a distinct distribution pattern of station 4d LNs. Inclusion of the proximal two-thirds of the flap, which carries majority of the LNs, is recommended for VGLNT.

Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis and Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for the Treatment of Lymphedema-A Canadian Case Series

Introduction: Lymphedema is a chronic and debilitating condition. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfers (VLNT) for the treatment of patients suffering from lymphedema, mainly by comparing pre- and postoperative daily compression use, limb volumes, and occurrence of cellulitis. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who were treated by a single surgeon for lymphedema with LVA and/or VLNT between March 2018 and February 2020. Eighteen limbs met the inclusion criteria. The severity of lymphatic dysfunction was assessed by indocyanine green lymphangiography. Patients with patent vessels were offered LVA, whereas those without were offered VLNT. Pre- and postoperative circumferential limb measurements, use of compression garments, and postoperative complications were compared. Results: Nine limbs underwent LVA, 8 underwent VLNT, and one both. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Postoperatively, all but 3 patients (83%) were able to cease daily compression. When considering excess limb volumes, the average reduction was 58%. This reduction was achieved despite compression weaning. Forty-four percent of patients (8) reported episodes of recurrent cellulitis preoperatively, while postoperatively, only 3 of those patients (17%) experienced cellulitis, which was statistically significant (P  =  .018). No surgical complications occurred. Conclusions: Patients with lymphedema can benefit from LVA and VLNT surgery. An important effect of surgery is decreased dependence on daily compression garments to maintain a stable and reasonable limb volume. The reduction of limb circumference after 1 year was similar to LVA and VLNT. Episodes of cellulitis were significantly lower after the intervention.

Improving quality of life after breast cancer: a comparison of two microsurgical treatment options for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL)

PURPOSE

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) entails the autologous relocation of lymph nodes to a lymphedematous region of the body, whereas lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) creates a direct bypass between the lymphatic and venous system. Both techniques are meant to lastingly bolster the local lymphatic drainage capacity. This study compared safety and effectiveness of VLNT and LVA in patients with chronic breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from our encrypted database composed of patients with chronic BCRL who were treated with either VLNT or LVA and had a minimum follow-up of two years. Patient-specific variables analyzed included pre- and postoperative arm circumferences, lymphedema stages and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 96 patients demonstrated a complete follow-up period of two years. The VLNT group displayed larger preoperative circumferential measurements, evident in both in the isolated examination of the affected arm, as well as when adjusted for the contralateral unaffected arm. Significant reduction in arm volume was achieved by both groups. However, VLNT demonstrated superior relative reduction rates than LVA, neutralizing any significant arm size disparities after 24 months. Surgery duration was slightly longer for VLNT than LVA. Postoperative complications, predominantly minor, were exclusively observed in the VLNT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VLNT and LVA offer significant improvement for patients suffering from chronic BCRL. VLNT shows an even greater potential for improvement in more severe cases of BCRL, but involves a higher risk for (mostly minor) complications.

Treatment of Rat Lymphedema by Propeller Lymphatic Tissue Flap Combined with Nanofibrillar Collagen Scaffolds

BACKGROUND

 The aim of our study was to evaluate a new propeller vascularized lymphatic tissue flap (pVLNT) combined with aligned nanofibrillar collagen scaffolds (CS) (BioBridge) in reducing lymphedema in the rat lymphedema model.

METHODS

 Unilateral left hindlimb lymphedema was created in 15 female Sprague-Dawley rats following inguinal and popliteal lymph nodes (LN) resection and radiation. An inguinal pVLNT was elevated from the contralateral groin and transferred through a skin tunnel to the affected groin. Four collagen threads were attached to the flap and inserted in the hindlimb at the subcutaneous level in a fan shape. The three study groups consisted of group A (control), group B (pVLNT), and group C (pVLNT + CS). Volumetric analysis of both hindlimbs was performed using micro-computed tomography imaging before the surgery (at initial time point) and then at 1 and 4 months, postoperatively, and the relative volume difference (excess volume) was measured for each animal. Lymphatic drainage was assessed by indocyanine green (ICG) fluoroscopy for number and morphology of new collectors and the time required for ICG to move from injection point to the midline.

RESULTS

 Four months after the induction of lymphedema, an increased relative volume difference remained in group A (5.32 ± 4.74%), while there was a significant relative volume reduction in group B (-13.39 ± 8.55%) and an even greater reduction in group C (-14.56 ± 5.04%). ICG fluoroscopy proved the functional restoration of lymphatic vessels and viability of pVLNT in both B and C groups. Notably, only group C demonstrated statistically significant improvements in lymphatic pattern/morphology and in the number of lymphatic collectors as compared with the control group A.

CONCLUSION

 The pedicle lymphatic tissue flap combined with SC is an effective procedure for the treatment of lymphedema in rats. It can be easily translated into treatment of humans' lower and upper limb lymphedema and further clinical studies are warranted.

Combined perforator flaps and lymphatic procedures in reconstructions after sarcoma resection

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas are a subtle category of tumors that often require an extensive surgical resection for definitive treatment. This kind of intervention inevitably leads to large tissue damage and, when regions with rich lymphatic network are involved, postoperative complications such as lymphocele or lymphedema are quite common. In this report we present our experience with the combination of lymphatic procedures with perforator flaps for defects reconstruction and lymphatic complications preventions after sarcoma resection throughout the body.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2021, 15 patients underwent a surgical resection of soft tissue sarcoma, also including bone tissue in 2 cases, requiring soft tissue reconstruction. A perforator flap reconstruction surgery was performed in all cases. The median age was 59.8 years old (ranging 23-84), 8 patients were females and 7 were males. The lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery concept was applied to all cases, while other additional lymphatic procedures were chosen individually for every patient.

RESULTS

All patients were successfully treated without any perioperative complications. In 3 cases infected seroma was encountered in the acceptor site and then successfully treated by means of debridement and vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy. 2 patients experienced postoperative lymphedema in the acceptor site which was managed by secondary procedures. Good functional and aesthetic outcomes were achieved in all cases. The mean follow-up was 19.6 months (range 10-33 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Different combinations of modern lymphatic procedures can be created to find the best solution and tailor the treatment to the patient's needs. Preventative measures regarding lymphatic complications can be highly effective and should be taken into consideration in every reconstructive approach following large soft tissue defects with impairment of the lymphatic network.

Sentinel node restoration by vascularized lymph node transfer in mice

BACKGROUND

Recent reports have indicated that vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) may improve the impaired immunity in lymphedema but there has been no report concerning anti-cancer immunity. In the early tumor immune response, dendritic cells (DCs) participate in tumor recognition and antigen presentation in local lymphatics. Here, we investigated the impact of VLNT on DC dynamics against cancer in mouse models.

METHODS

Forty-seven 8-week-old C57BL/6 N male mice were divided into three surgical groups: a VLNT model in which a vascularized inguinal lymph node (LN) flap was transferred into the ipsilateral fossa after a popliteal LN was removed; a LN dissection (LND) model in which the popliteal LN was dissected; and a control model in which a skin incision was made at the popliteal fossa and an ipsilateral inguinal LN was removed. Postoperative lymphatic flows were observed by indocyanine green lymphography and B16-F10-luc2 mouse melanoma were implanted into the ipsilateral footpad. The proportion of DCs in the transplanted nodes was measured by CD11c immunohistochemistry using digital imaging analysis 4 days after cancer implantation. Metastases to the lungs and LNs were quantitatively evaluated by luciferase assay 4 weeks after cancer implantation.

RESULTS

After VLNT, lymphatic reconnection was observed in 59.2% of mice. The proportion of DCs was significantly higher in the VLNT group with lymphatic reconnection (8.6% ± 1.0%) than in the naïve LN (4.3% ± 0.4%) (p < .001). The tumor burden of lung metastases was significantly less in the VLNT group with lymphatic reconnection compared with the LND group (p = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

Metastasis decreased in mice with reconnected lymphatics after VLNT. A possible explanation was that lymphatic restoration may have contributed to the tumor immune response by allowing DC migration to LNs.

Giant Penoscrotal Lymphedema-What to Do? Presentation of a Curative Treatment Algorithm

BACKGROUND

While rare, penoscrotal lymphedema (PL) is accompanied with devastating effects on the quality of life of patients. Moreover, especially for patients with excessive (giant) PL, no standardized curative treatment has been defined. This article therefore retrospectively evaluates the authors' surgical treatment approach for giant PL, which includes resection alone or in combination with a free vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT).

METHODS

A total of ten patients met the inclusion criteria. One patient dropped out of the study before therapy commenced. Eight of the nine remaining patients presented with end-stage (giant) PL. One patient presented with manifest pitting edema. All patients were treated with penoscrotal resection and reconstruction. Additionally, five patients received VLNT into the groin or scrotum.

RESULTS

The extent of the lymphedema was specified with a treatment-oriented classification system. The median follow-up was 49.0 months. No patient showed a recurrence. Patients who received VLNT into the scrotum displayed a significantly improved lymphatic transport of the scrotum.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced PL should be treated in a standardized surgical fashion as suggested by our proposed algorithm. VLNT from the lateral thoracic region into the scrotum must be considered. If treated correctly, surgical intervention of end-stage PL leads to good results with a low recurrence rate.

Optimizing Outcomes in Lymphedema Reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe current surgical techniques for treating primary and secondary lymphedema. 2. Optimize the surgical care of patients with lymphedema.

SUMMARY

Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in the surgical treatment of lymphedema. The most notable changes have been the reintroduction and evolution of physiologic techniques, including lymphovenous bypass-sometimes referred to as lymphovenous anastomosis in the literature-and vascularized lymph node transplant. These surgical modalities are now often used as first-line surgical options or may be combined with nonphysiologic approaches, including direct excision and suction-assisted lipectomy. Surgeons continue to debate the most appropriate sequence and combination of surgical treatment, particularly for patients at both extremes of the severity spectrum. Furthermore, debate remains around the need to apply different treatment approaches for patients with upper versus lower extremity involvement and primary versus secondary cause. In this article, we provide a summary of the surgical techniques currently used for both primary and secondary lymphedema and provide our recommendations for optimizing the surgical care of patients with lymphedema.

Lymph Node Transfer and Neolymphangiogenesis: From Theory to Evidence

BACKGROUND

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has proven to be a valuable treatment for patients with advanced stages of lymphedema. Although spontaneous neolymphangiogenesis has been advocated to explain the positive effects of VLNT, there is still a lack of supportive biological evidence. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the postoperative formation of new lymphatic vessels using histologic skin sections from the lymphedematous limb.

METHODS

Patients with lymphedema of the extremities who had undergone gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap surgery between January of 2016 and December of 2018 were identified. Full-thickness 6-mm skin-punch biopsy specimens were obtained from patients at identical sites of the lymphedematous limb during the VLNT surgical procedure (T0) and 1 year later (T1). The histologic samples were immunostained with anti-podoplanin/gp36 antibody.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients with lymph node transfer were included. At the 12-month follow-up, the mean circumference reduction rate was 44.3 ± 4.4 at the above-elbow/above-knee level and 60.9 ± 7 at the below-elbow/below-knee level. Podoplanin expression values were, on average, 7.92 ± 1.77 vessels/mm 2 at T0 and 11.79 ± 3.38 vessels/mm 2 at T1. The difference between preoperative and postoperative values was statistically significant ( P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSION

This study provides anatomic evidence that a neolymphangiogenic process is induced by the VLNT procedure because new functional lymphatic vessels can be detected in close proximity to the transferred lymph nodes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Supermicrosurgery: past, present and future

Supermicrosurgery was popularised in 1997 and is defined as a technique of microvascular anastomosis for single nerve fascicles and vessels 0.3-0.8 mm in diameter. It requires the use of powerful microscopes, ultradelicate microsurgical instruments and specialist dyes. The development of supermicrosurgery has vastly improved the ability of microsurgeons to create true perforator flaps with minimal donor site morbidity for reconstructive surgery and improved the precision of additional microsurgical techniques. This review outlines the origins and history of supermicrosurgery, its current applications in reconstructive surgery (including fingertip reconstructions, true perforator flap surgery, nerve flaps and lymphoedema surgery), supermicrosurgery training and future directions for the field.

Utilization of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography for Selection of Effective Surgical Method in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Background and Objectives: When considering surgery for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), it is crucial to determine which surgery will be most effective for the patient and establish the indications for each surgery. Our study retrospectively compared the results of preoperative noncontrast MR lymphangiography (NMRL) performed on the lymphedematous limb of patients before surgery, with the aim of analyzing whether preoperative NMRL can be used as a criterion for determining the type of surgery. Materials and Methods: From January 2020 to June 2022, a total of 138 patients with lymphedema underwent surgery at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. All patients underwent preoperative NMRL imaging and were classified into stages 1-3 based on the MRI severity index using the authors' previous reference. Three types of surgery, LVA, LVA + liposuction, and LVA + VLNT, were conducted on all patients. The effectiveness of the surgery was evaluated one year postoperatively using the interlimb volume difference before and after surgery, the fluid volume of the edematous limb measured by bioimpedance spectroscopy, and the subjective satisfaction of the patients through the Lymph Q questionnaire. Results: In this study, out of a total of 138 patients, 26 (19%) were MRI stage 1, 62 (45%) were stage 2, and 50 (36%) were stage 3. Of the 83 patients who underwent LVA surgery, the greatest decrease in interlimb volume difference was observed in stage 2 patients, and subjective satisfaction was also the most effective in stage 2. In the case of LVA + liposuction patients, a significant volume decrease and a high satisfaction were observed in stage 3 patients. In the case of LVA + VLNT patients, there was no difference in volume decrease according to the stage, but a greater decrease in body fluid volume was observed as the MRI severity index score increased through BIA. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that NMRL imaging is a useful modality for determining the most effective surgical method and predicting the surgical outcome in patients with lymphedema. This highlights the importance of using NMRL in the treatment planning of lymphedema patients.

Outcome Analysis of Combined Surgical Approaches in Advanced-stage Upper Extremity Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema

Background

This study aimed to discuss several surgical approaches for advanced-stage breast cancer-related lymphedema and compared their treatment outcomes.

Methods

The patients who underwent surgery with International Society of Lymphology stage III lymphedema were included in this study. The three surgical methods used here were (1) suction-assisted lipectomy with lymphovenous anastomosis, (2) autologous breast reconstruction with muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap combined with inguinal lymph node transfer, and (3) vascularized lymph node transfer with free omental flap. Analysis of the postoperative outcomes in the patients was based on the difference in volume between patients pre- and postoperatively, LYMPH-Q questionnaire, and bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Results

Eighty-seven patients with stage IIb or higher disease underwent surgery. 38 patients underwent suction-assisted lipectomy + lymphovenous anastomosis, 23 underwent autologous breast reconstruction with vascularized lymph node transfer + lymphovenous anastomosis, and 26 underwent right gastroepiploic omental vascularized lymph node transfer with lymphovenous anastomosis. The LYMPH-Q questionnaire, which evaluates patients' subjective satisfaction, showed that the autologous breast reconstruction group showed the greatest improvement, whereas in bioimpedance analysis, the omental flap group demonstrated the greatest postoperative improvement compared with preoperative values. However, suction-assisted lipectomy was considered the most effective surgical method for reducing limb volume in patients with high-stage lymphedema accompanied by fibrosis and volume increase.

Conclusions

We observed slightly different clinical effects for each surgical method; however, all surgical methods demonstrated a reduction in the degree of edema and an increase in patient satisfaction.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Post-Prostatectomy Lymphedema: What's New?

Lymphedema is a chronic progressive disorder that significantly compromises patients' quality of life. In Western countries, it often results from cancer treatment, as in the case of post-radical prostatectomy lymphedema, where it can affect up to 20% of patients, with a significant disease burden. Traditionally, diagnosis, assessment of severity, and management of disease have relied on clinical assessment. In this landscape, physical and conservative treatments, including bandages and lymphatic drainage have shown limited results. Recent advances in imaging technology are revolutionizing the approach to this disorder: magnetic resonance imaging has shown satisfactory results in differential diagnosis, quantitative classification of severity, and most appropriate treatment planning. Further innovations in microsurgical techniques, based on the use of indocyanine green to map lymphatic vessels during surgery, have improved the efficacy of secondary LE treatment and led to the development of new surgical approaches. Physiologic surgical interventions, including lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT), are going to face widespread diffusion. A combined approach to microsurgical treatment provides the best results: LVA is effective in promoting lymphatic drainage, bridging VLNT delayed lymphangiogenic and immunological effects in the lymphatic impairment site. Simultaneous VLNT and LVA are safe and effective for patients with both early and advanced stages of post-prostatectomy LE. A new perspective is now represented by the combination of microsurgical treatments with the positioning of nano fibrillar collagen scaffolds (BioBridgeTM) to favor restoring the lymphatic function, allowing for improved and sustained volume reduction. In this narrative review, we proposed an overview of new strategies for diagnosing and treating post-prostatectomy lymphedema to get the most appropriate and successful patient treatment with an overview of the main artificial intelligence applications in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of lymphedema.

A comparative study between deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction and DIEP flap breast reconstruction coupled with vascularized lymph node transfer: Improving the quality of life of patients with breast cancer related lymphedema without affecting donor site outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite simultaneous microvascular breast reconstruction (MBR) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) gaining wide popularity as a potential treatment for breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL), there is a lack of evidence supporting the procedure. There are few reports in the literature, and no study has compared simple deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) to simultaneous DIEP flap and VLNT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our series of DIEP flaps was conducted. Patients presenting with BCRL who had delayed MBR and simultaneous VLNT were selected. Thirty-two patients were included and compared with a control group of delayed MBR with DIEP flap alone. Clinical evaluation, circumference reduction rate, and LYMQOL questionnaire were used to compare preoperative and postoperative findings in the study group. A digital version of BREAST Q questionnaire was administered to all patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study group, with a mean follow-up of 42.5 ± 25.7 months and mean age of 54.1 ± 7.8 years. The mean circumference reduction rate was 46.1 ± 52.3, 39 ± 42.3, 47.5 ± 53.5, 39.2 ± 52.4, 33.6 ± 50.1 at the deltoid insertion, above the elbow, below the elbow, at the mid-forearm and wrist respectively. Postoperative LYMQOL scores significantly improved (function 1.21, appearance 1.15, symptoms 1.34, mood 1.33, overall QOLscore 8.6) from preoperative baseline (p < .001). There was no significant difference in term of outcomes and complications rate of the donor site between the study and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous DIEPandVLNT improves the HRQOL of patients with lymphedema. Coupling VLNT with abdominal flap does not increase the morbidity of donor site.

Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast reconstruction is established as integral part of the treatment. New materials, indications and surgical techniques are subject to rapid modification to further improve safety, quality and longevity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Skin-sparing-mastectomy is accepted as an appropriate alternative in risk-reducing and many breast cancer patients, further reducing conventional mastectomy patterns.Radiation in combination with reconstruction is still challenging with no clear advances reducing skin-toxicity.Autologous reconstructions, not only in radiation settings, are turning to a first line approach. A trend driven by improved techniques to minimize morbidity and flap-variations.Breast implant surfaces associated with a high risk of Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) are now withdrawn. The residual risk for the remaining implant styles is not known, but can be expected considerably lower than estimations published presently.In order to reduce local complications, supplemental material often in combination with prepectoral implant placement is advertised. The present evidence on long-term outcome is limited.Super-microsurgery treating lymphedema is evolving rapidly. Refinements of various techniques and their differential indication are under evaluation to standardize the procedures.

SUMMARY

Breast reconstruction evolved to a complex, specialized field with a multitude of options. A multidisciplinary team is required to fully utilize todays potential and offer optimal individual treatments.

Technical details for inset of flaps in transfer of double-level gastroepiploic lymph node flaps for lower extremity lymphedema

BACKGROUND

In this study, the method that can be followed to ensure rapid and uncomplicated recovery of lymph node flap (LNF) applied in the medial of the ankle for lymphedema treatment was investigated.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with class II of lower limb lymphedema underwent transfer of gastroepiploic LNF to the medial ankle and popliteal fossa areas. At the popliteal fossa region, the wound could always be closed primarily by the advancement of neighboring skin. The wound closure could be classified into three types at the medial ankle area (A) The partially exposed LNF was covered with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) (n = 9). (B) A larger local flap was elevated, and the donor site of the local flap was covered with STSG (n = 18). (C) The skin flap's donor site was treated with pre-tie sutures (n = 10).

RESULTS

In the popliteal region, there was no complication of wound healing. In the ankle region, the wound was coated by a thin layer of hematoma over the exposed LNF in 5 patients of group A. It healed secondarily except for one patient who needed a secondary skin graft. The healing was perfect in group B. In group C the healing was good, but there was a hypertrophic scar in 7 patients and required steroid injection later.

CONCLUSION

To avoid complications of the gastroepiploic LNF at the medial ankle, it should be entirely covered by an anteriorly-based local flap, and the donor site defect of the local flap can be treated with either pre-tie sutures or a skin graft.

Investigations on the donor limb after harvest of lymphatic vessels for lymphedema surgery

OBJECTIVE

Microsurgical lymphatic vessel transplantation is one of the well-established therapies for lymphedema. Lymphatic vessels are harvested from a healthy thigh and transplanted into lymphedematous limbs to create a lymphatic bypass. Its benefit on lymphatic drainage has already been proven. However, to the best of our knowledge, the effect on the lymphatic function of the donor site has not yet been studied. Our aim was to evaluate the long-term postoperative lymphatic function in the donor site by clinical and scintigraphic examinations and a patient questionnaire.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 25 women (mean age, 57.2 years) who had undergone follow-up after lymph vessel transplantation to treat secondary lymphedema of the arm comprised the study group. Lymphatic vessel function of the donor site was evaluated by circumferential measurements of the limb and, in nine cases, by lymphatic scintigraphy. Additionally, a questionnaire was used to assess the patients' pre- and postoperative complaints for the donor limb and quality of life. Separately, the medical records of 100 patients who had undergone lymphatic harvest and been followed up were reviewed for documented signs of lymphatic function of the donor limb.

RESULTS

The lymphatic grafts were harvested from the thigh (left, n = 9; right, n = 16) and transplanted to bridge the region of lymphatic obstruction in the axilla. The mean follow-up period was 4.5 years after surgery. None of the patients had shown significant changes in the circumference of the donor limb or pathologic findings via lymphatic scintigraphy. None of the patients had reported any impairment in the donor leg or showed symptoms of postoperative lymphedema or erysipelas.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results have shown that harvesting lymphatic vessels from the thigh for lymphatic vessel transplantation is possible without significant donor site morbidity.

Combining reconstructive and ablative surgical treatment of chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL): safe and effective

PURPOSE

We investigated whether a one-stage combination of vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) with water jet-assisted liposuction (WAL) can be safely performed and results in improved patient outcomes such as a greater reduction in arm volume when treating chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included all patients from our encrypted lymphedema database treated for chronic BCRL with VLNT or VLNT + WAL who had a minimum follow-up of two years. We analyzed patient-specific variables including arm circumferences as well as patient-reported outcomes before and after surgery as well as surgery time, surgery-related complications and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Only the mean preoperative differences of the circumferences between the lymphedematous and the unaffected arm in individual patients showed a statistically significant difference between treatment groups (p < 0.05). Indeed, patients treated with VLNT + WAL had consistently larger differences in individual sets of arms and therefore more pronounced chronic BCRL. The mean surgery time was significantly longer in the VLNT + WAL group (p < 0.05). Complications were seldom and similar in both groups. Using a numeric rating scale, the level of patient satisfaction following treatment did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.323).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a one-stage combination of VLNT with WAL does not result in more complications even though it also entails a longer surgery time. This is acceptable as secondary interventions resulting in overall longer surgery times and higher costs can be avoided. A one-stage combination might be especially favourable for patients suffering from more severe chronic BCRL.

Treatment of multiple limb lymphedema with combined supermicrosurgical techniques

INTRODUCTION

Lymphedema surgery including lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) are effective treatments for lymphedema; however, treating multiple limbs in a single operation using both approaches has not been described. We hypothesize multiple limb lymphedema can be treated effectively in one operation.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Retrospective review of seven patients undergoing extreme lymphedema surgery (mean age: 53.2 years; range: 33-66 years) with an average BMI of 34.8 kg/m² (range: 17.6-53.6 kg/m² ). Two patients developed bilateral upper extremity (UE) lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment, three had bilateral lower extremity (LE) lymphedema, and two suffered from lymphedema of all four extremities due to breast cancer treatment.

RESULTS

One patient with bilateral UE lymphedema was treated with bilateral inguinal node transfers with LVA and the other with combined bilateral DIEP flaps and inguinal node transfers with LVA. Three patients had bilateral LE lymphedema: two were treated with split omental/gastroepiploic nodes, and one underwent simultaneous supraclavicular and submental node transfers. LVAs were performed in one leg in each patient. Two patients with four-limb lymphedema underwent bilateral inguinal node transfers with DIEP flaps and bilateral LE LVA. In total, there were eight UE and 10 LE treated. Average follow-up was 15.8 months (range: 12.6-28.4 months), all patients reported subjective improvement in symptoms, were able to decrease use of compression garments and pumps, and no patients developed cellulitis.

CONCLUSION

Patients suffering from lymphedema of multiple extremities can be treated safely and effectively combining both LVA and VLNT in a single operation.

Practical Strategies in Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss the natural history and pathophysiology of sarcoma. 2. Summarize the most up-to-date multidisciplinary management of soft-tissue sarcoma. 3. Provide a synopsis of reconstructive modalities based on anatomical location. 4. Highlight some novel strategies for treatment of lymphedema and phantom limb pain that are common sequelae following treatment and resection of soft-tissue sarcomas.

SUMMARY

The management of soft-tissue sarcoma presents unique challenges to the reconstructive surgeon. The optimal management mandates a multidisciplinary approach; however, reconstruction must take into account the extent of the resection and exposed vital structures, but often occurs in the setting of adjuvant treatments including chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Reconstruction is based on the extent of the defect and the location of the primary tumor. As such, an evidence-based, algorithmic approach following the reconstructive ladder is warranted to minimize the risks of complications and maximize success, which varies from head and neck to torso to breast to extremity sarcomas. Aside from reconstruction of the defect, advances in the surgical treatment of lymphedema and neuropathic pain resulting from treatment and extirpation of soft-tissue sarcoma are critical to maintain function and patients' quality of life.

Overview of Lymphedema for Physicians and Other Clinicians: A Review of Fundamental Concepts

Lymphedema has historically been underrated in clinical practice, education, and scholarship to the detriment of many patients with this chronic, debilitating condition. The mechanical insufficiency of the lymphatic system causes the abnormal accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitium, which triggers a cascade of adverse consequences such as fat deposition and fibrosis. As the condition progresses, patients present with extremity heaviness, itchiness, skin infections, and, in later stages, dermal fibrosis, skin papillomas, acanthosis, and other trophic skin changes. Correspondingly, lymphedema results in psychological morbidity, including anxiety, depression, social avoidance, and a decreased quality of life, encompassing emotional, functional, physical, and social domains. For this review, we conducted a literature search using PubMed and EMBASE and herein summarize the evidence related to the fundamental concepts of lymphedema. This article aims to raise awareness of this serious condition and outline and review the fundamental concepts of lymphedema.

A Prospective Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Vascularized Lymph Node Transplant

PURPOSE

While vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT) has gained popularity, there are a lack of prospective long-term studies and standardized outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VLNT using all available outcome measures.

METHODS

This was a prospective study on all consecutive patients who underwent VLNT. Outcomes were assessed with 2 patient-reported outcome metrics, limb volume, bioimpedance, need for compression, and incidence of cellulitis.

RESULTS

There were 89 patients with the following donor sites: omentum (73%), axilla (13%), supraclavicular (7%), groin (3.5%). The mean follow-up was 23.7±12 months. There was a significant improvement at 2 years postoperatively across all outcome measures: 28.4% improvement in the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale, 20% average reduction in limb volume, 27.5% improvement in bioimpedance score, 93% reduction in cellulitis, and 34% of patients no longer required compression. Complications were transient and low without any donor site lymphedema.

CONCLUSIONS

VLNT is a safe and effective treatment for lymphedema with significant benefits fully manifesting at 2 years postoperatively. Omentum does not have any donor site lymphedema risk making it an attractive first choice.

Vascularized lymph node transplantation successfully reverses lymphedema and maintains immunity in a rat lymphedema model

Vascularized lymph node transplantation (VLNT) has shown inspiring results for the treatment of lymphedema. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how VLNT restores lymphatic drainage and whether or not immunity recovers after surgery. Hindlimb lymphedema model was created using rats with extensive groin and popliteal lymph node removable following with radiotherapy, and the lymphedema was confirmed using indocyanine green (ICG) lymphangiography and micro-computer tomography for volume measurement. VLNT was performed 1 month later. Volume measurement, ICG lymphangiography, histology, and immune reaction were done 1 month after surgery. VLNT successfully reduced the volume of the lymphedema hindlimb, restored lymphatic drainage function with proven lymphatic channel, and reduced lymphedema-related inflammation and fibrosis. It promotes lymphangiogenesis shown from ICG lymphangiography, histology, and enhanced lymphangiogenesis gene expression. Dendritic cell trafficking via the regenerated lymphatic channels was successfully restored, and maintained systemic immune response was proved using dinitrofluorobenzene sensitization and challenge. VLNT effectively reduces lymphedema and promotes lymphatic regeneration in the capillary lymphatic but not the collecting lymphatic vessels. Along with the re-established lymphatic system was the restoration of immune function locally and systemically. This correlated to clinical experience regarding the reduction of swelling and infection episodes after VLNT in lymphedema patients.

Lymphatic Tissue Transfer: Ultrasound-Guided Description and Preoperative Planning of Vascularised Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Units, and Lymphatic Vessels Transfers

Background: The modern concept of lymphatic transfer includes vascularised lymph node transfer (VLNT), lymphatic vessels transfer (lymph interpositional flap transfer, LIFT) and lymphatic system transfer (vascularised lymph nodes and afferent lymphatics, LYST). The aim of this paper was to report our experience with different types of lymphatic transfer. Patients and Method: From June 2016 to June 2020, 30 consecutive patients affected by extremity lymphedema and 15 patients affected by post-traumatic lower extremity soft tissue defects, underwent lymphatic transfer (VLNT, LYST or LIFT). All cases were preoperatively evaluated by both high frequency and ultra-high frequency ultrasound. Flap features were recorded, as well as qualitative and quantitative outcomes at 1 year postoperative. Results: The mean postoperative lymphedema index reduction was 7.2 ± 5.7 for upper extremity and 20.7 ± 7.1 for lower extremity. No dismission of compression garments occurred, 12 patients (26%) referred more stable results of physical treatment and 1 case showed a 1-class compression reduction. All the LIFTs aimed as preventive did not develop post-traumatic lymphedema. In all cases of distal placement of VLNT and/or LYST, patients were dissatisfied with the aesthetic appearance of reconstruction, while no donor site scar disappointment was referred. Conclusion: When LVA is not feasible, LTT may represent a valid treatment option. This report was aimed at comprehensively describing and assessing how different lymphatic tissue transfer modalities may fulfil the different reconstructive needs of lymphedema patients.

Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Strategies for Upper and Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Comprehensive Review

Lymphedema is a chronic disabling condition affecting a growing number of patients worldwide. Although lymphedema is not life-threatening, several reports underlined detrimental consequences in terms of distress, pain, functional impairment, and infections with a relevant decrease in quality of life. Currently, there is no cure, and the therapeutic management of this condition aims at slowing down the disease progression and preventing secondary complications. Early diagnosis is paramount to enhance the effects of rehabilitation or surgical treatments. On the other hand, a multidisciplinary treatment should be truly integrated, the combination of microsurgical and reductive procedures should be considered a valid strategy to manage extremity lymphedema, and rehabilitation should be considered the cornerstone of the multidisciplinary treatment not only for patients not suitable for surgical interventions but also before and after surgical procedures. Therefore, a specialized management of Plastic Reconstructive Surgeons and Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine physicians should be mandatory to address patients’ needs and optimize the treatment of this disabling and detrimental condition. Therefore, the aim of this review was to characterize the comprehensive management of lymphedema, providing a broad overview of the potential therapy available in the current literature to optimize the comprehensive management of lymphedema and minimize complications.

Distal facial vein catheterization for prevention and management of thrombosis in vascularized lymph node transfers

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the outcomes of the distal facial vein catheterization (DFVC) to manage venous thrombosis in vascularized submental lymph nodes (VSLN) flap transplantations.

METHODS

Between March 2017 and December 2020, patients who underwent VSLN flaps were divided into Group I: combined delayed primary retention sutures (DPRS) with DFVC, and Group II: DPRS alone. Primary outcomes were early (within 72 h) and late venous thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included other nonvascular complications and mechanical factors of the thrombosis.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients who underwent 106 VSLN flaps, including 37 and 69 flaps in Groups I and II, respectively, were included. There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, Taiwan lymphoscintigraphy staging, and surgical factors between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Early venous thrombosis requiring re-exploration developed in one (2.7%) and three (4.3%) flaps in Groups I and II, respectively (p = 0.20). One flap (2.7%) and eight (11.5%) flaps developed late venous thrombosis in Groups I and II, respectively (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in total complication rates between both groups (p = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

VSLN flap transplantation had a significantly higher risk of late venous thrombosis. DFVC significantly decreased the late venous thrombosis.

Physical and Functional Outcomes of Simultaneous Vascularized Lymph Node Transplant and Lymphovenous Bypass in the Treatment of Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

The authors analyze the outcomes of simultaneous vascularized lymph node transplant and lymphovenous bypass for treatment of primary and secondary lymphedema. To the best of their knowledge, this is the largest study to date with long-term outcome data of this novel approach.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-eight patients who underwent physiologic surgical treatment over a 5.5-year period were evaluated using a prospective database and chart review. Preoperative characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes (volume difference change, Lymphedema Life Impact Scale score) were assessed. Statistical analysis including multivariate regression was performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty patients (67.1 percent) underwent simultaneous vascularized lymph node transplant and lymphovenous bypass. Mean body mass index was 26.9 ± 4.7 kg/m 2 . Ninety-two patients (41.8 percent) had lymphedema of the lower extremity, 121 (55.0 percent) had upper extremity involvement, and seven had lymphedema of upper and lower extremities (3.2 percent). Average duration of lymphedema was 95.4 ± 103.6 months. Thirty patients (13.6 percent) had primary lymphedema and 190 patients (86.4 percent) had secondary lymphedema. The majority improved and experienced volume reduction of an average 21.4 percent at 1 year ( p < 0.0001), 36.2 percent at 2 years ( p < 0.0001), 25.5 percent at 3 years ( p = 0.1), and 19.6 percent at 4 years. Median Lymphedema Life Impact Scale scores were 7.0 points lower ( p < 0.0001) at 3 months and improved progressively over time to 27.5 points lower at 3 years postoperatively ( p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous vascularized lymph node transplant and lymphovenous bypass is an appropriate and effective approach for both early and advanced stages of primary and secondary lymphedema, with significant objective and subjective improvements. Volume reduction in the affected limb was observed at all time points postoperatively, with significant improvement in Lymphedema Life Impact Scale scores.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Dual Fluorescent Tracers for Surgical Guidance: Preventing Donor-site Lymphedema in Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer

Introduction:

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) restores physiological lymphatic function. Although effective, postoperative impairment of donor-site lymphatic function and iatrogenic lymphedema following lymph node transfer remains a pressing concern.

Methods:

Prospective analysis of VLNT patients undergoing dual fluorescent tracers-assisted harvest was performed at our institution from September 2013 to April 2022. Reverse lymphatic mapping of the lower extremity was performed with indocyanine green (ICG). Blue dye was utilized in both white light and near-infrared spectra for visualization of donor-site lymphatic structures. Demographics, intraoperative details, and surgical outcomes were recorded.

Results:

Twenty-five patients were included. Median age was 52.9 years with a body mass index of 29.1 kg/m² and mean follow-up of 44 months (range 24 to 90 months). Lymphedema stage ranged from Campisi 2 to 4. Inguinal VLNT was performed in 13 patients, and 12 patients received combined VLNT and free flap breast reconstruction. No patients required change in lymph node donor site intraoperatively. All ICG stained nodes were preserved in situ. No cases of iatrogenic lower extremity lymphedema were observed. Postoperative bioimpedance spectroscopy, circumferential, and volumetric measurements of the donor-site limb did not show evidence of subclinical or clinical lymphedema. The donor site healed appropriately in 92% of patients; one patient developed methylene blue-induced skin necrosis.

Conclusion:

Reverse lymphatic mapping and surgical guidance with dual ICG and blue dye fluorescent tracers provides surgeons with real-time surgical guidance without radioisotope, improves surgical visualization in both white light and near-infrared spectra, and avoids iatrogenic lymphatic dysfunction in the donor limb.

May-Thurner Syndrome and Lymphedema Reconstruction

May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is an anatomical variant that results in compression of the left common iliac vein by the right common iliac artery. Although often asymptomatic, lower extremity swelling/edema, deep venous thrombosis, post-thrombotic syndrome, and eventual lymphedema (due to long-standing venous obstruction) can develop. The clinical management of patients presenting for lymphedema surgery with concomitant or undiagnosed MTS is not well described.

Methods

This review investigates two patients who were evaluated for unilateral lower extremity lymphedema, both of whom were subsequently diagnosed with MTS. Standard imaging (including lymphoscintigraphy, indocyanine green lymphangiography, and magnetic resonance venography) were performed to identify proximal venous obstruction. Treatment was accomplished using vascular surgical management, including stenting of the iliac vein before lymphedema reconstruction with vascularized lymph node transfer and multiple lymphovenous bypass.

Results

Both patients we examined in this review had improvement of lymphedema with vascular surgical management. Literature review reveals that MTS has an incidence as high as 20% in the population, although commonly unidentified due to lack of symptomatology.

Conclusions

There are no studies documenting the incidence of MTS in patients referred for lymphedema surgical management. Routine studies should be obtained to screen for proximal venous obstruction in patients presenting for surgical management of lower extremity lymphedema. Additional research is needed regarding the approach to managing patients with both MTS and lymphedema. Careful observational and prospective studies may elucidate the appropriate time interval between venous stenting and lymphedema microsurgical reconstruction.

[Rehabilitation in lymphedema surgery]

Conservative treatment of lymphedema usually includes complex decongestive therapy in order to reduce the volume of the lymphedema, and compression garments in the maintenance phase. Follow-up is carried out in the Rehabilitation Services. Surgical treatment of lymphedema is a therapeutic option, the interest of which has increased in recent years, although there is no current evidence that it can cure lymphedema and it is always accompanied by conservative treatment. Most studies focus on results according to the type of surgery and there is no standardized protocol for conservative treatment before or after surgery. The objective of this work is to prepare a compendium about the most frequent lymphedema surgeries and their indications, focusing on the rehabilitation treatment for each surgery.

Optimizing Treatment of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Using Combined DIEP Flap and Lymphedema Surgery

Patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer who undergo an axillary dissection and require adjuvant therapies such as radiation and chemotherapy are at high risk of developing lymphedema of the associated extremity. Historically, patients with lymphedema were treated with ablative procedures aimed simply to remove excess fluid and adiposity; however, the field of lymphatic surgery employing super-microsurgery techniques has witnessed tremendous advances in a relatively short period of time. Advancements in surgical instruments, microscope magnification and optics, imaging technology, and surgeon experience have ushered in a new era of hope to treat patients suffering from breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL). Here we aim to present the available options for patients suffering from BCRL, and the pinnacle in reconstruction and restoration for these patients.

National Outcomes of Prophylactic Lymphovenous Bypass during Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

BACKGROUND

 Breast cancer treatment, including axillary lymph node excision, radiation, and chemotherapy, can cause upper extremity lymphedema, increasing morbidity and health care costs. Institutions increasingly perform prophylactic lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to reduce the risk of lymphedema but reports of complications are lacking. We examine records from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to examine the safety of these procedures.

METHODS

 Procedures involving ALND from 2013 to 2019 were extracted from the NSQIP database. Patients who simultaneously underwent procedures with the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 38999 (other procedures of the lymphatic system), 35201 (repair of blood vessel), or 38308 (lymphangiotomy) formed the prophylactic LVB group. Patients in the LVB and non-LVB groups were compared for differences in demographics and 30-day postoperative complications including unplanned reoperation, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection. Subgroup analysis was performed, controlling for extent of breast surgery and reconstruction. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of reoperation.

RESULTS

 The ALND without LVB group contained 45,057 patients, and the ALND with LVB group contained 255 (0.6%). Overall, the LVB group was associated with increased operative time (288 vs. 147 minutes, p < 0.001) and length of stay (1.7 vs. 1.3 days, p < 0.001). In patients with concurrent mastectomy without immediate reconstruction, the LVB group had a higher rate of DVTs (3.0 vs. 0.2%, p = 0.009). Reoperation, wound infection, and dehiscence rates did not differ across subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that LVB was not a predictor of reoperations.

CONCLUSION

 Prophylactic LVB at time of ALND is a generally safe and well-tolerated procedure and is not associated with increased reoperations or wound complications. Although only four patients in the LVB group had DVTs, this was a significantly higher rate than in the non-LVB group and warrants further investigation.

The Combination of Lymph Node Transfer and Excisional Procedures in Bilateral Lower Extremity Lymphedema: Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Assessment with Long-Term Follow-Up

Background: Bilateral lower extremity lymphedema is a rare and invalidating condition that poses a great challenge to the scientific community, and deeply affects the quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. A combined protocol consisting of lymph node transfer and a reductive method have never been reported for the treatment of this condition, except for small case series with brief follow-up periods. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data of 29 patients, mean age 51 ± 17.1 years, who had been diagnosed with bilateral lower extremity lymphedema. Gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node transfer was performed in all the patients, and an excisional procedure was associated according to the clinical stage. Clinical history, circumferential limb measurements, complications, episodes of cellulitis, and responses to the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire were analyzed. Results: The mean follow-up was 38.4 ± 11.8 months. A significant reduction in the episodes of cellulitis per year was observed (p < 0.001). In our series, BMI and duration of symptoms were significantly related to the development of cellulitis during the postoperative period, p = 0.006 and p = 0.020, respectively. The LYMQoL questionnaire showed a significant quality of life improvement from 3.4 ± 0.9 to 6.2 ± 0.8 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: An integrated approach is essential for the treatment of bilateral lower extremity lymphedema: reductive and reconstructive methods are complementary to achieve a successful outcome. Timely treatment and BMI reduction are relevant in order to decrease the number of episodes of cellulitis. An attentive follow-up is necessary to identify recurrence and treat affected patients in time.

Lymphatic Collecting Vessels in Health and Disease: A Review of Histopathological Modifications in Lymphedema

Secondary lymphedema of the extremities affects millions of people in the world as a common side effect of oncological treatments with heavy impact on every day life of patients and on the health care system. One of the surgical techniques for lymphedema treatment is the creation of a local connection between lymphatic vessels and veins, facilitating drainage of lymphatic fluid into the circulatory system. Successful results, however, rely on using a functional vessel for the anastomosis, and vessel function, in turn, depends on its structure. The structure of lymphatic collecting vessels changes with the progression of lymphedema. They appear initially dilated by excess interstitial fluid entered at capillary level. The number of lymphatic smooth muscle cells in their media then increases in the attempt to overcome the impaired drainage. When lymphatic muscle cells hyperplasia occurs at the expenses of the lumen, vessel patency decreases hampering lymph flow. Finally, collagen fiber accumulation leads to complete occlusion of the lumen rendering the vessel unfit to conduct lymph. Different types of vessels may coexist in the same patient but usually the distal part of the limb contains less affected vessels that are more likely to perform efficient lymphatic–venular anastomosis. Here we review the structure of the lymphatic collecting vessels in health and in lymphedema, focusing on the histopathological changes of the lymphatic vessel wall based on the observations on segments of the vessels used for lymphatic–venular anastomoses.

Combined lymph node transfer and suction-assisted lipectomy in lymphedema treatment: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have analyzed the combination of suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) in lymphedema treatment, reporting positive outcomes. However, it is difficult to draw conclusions due to the heterogeneity of the studies. Aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of VLNT and SAL in lymphedema treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and May 2019, 94 patients with upper or lower limb stage IIb-III lymphedema were enrolled and treated with the gastroepiploic VLNT followed by SAL. Patients were prospectively evaluated through circumference measurement and clinical examination, including number of episodes of cellulitis.

RESULTS

Among patients enrolled in the study 83 were affected by lower limb lymphedema (LLL) and 11 were affected by upper limb lymphedema (ULL). Average follow-up was 3 ± 0.8 years. In the LLL group, the mean circumference reduction rates (CRR) were 60.4, 56.9, 29.6, and 55.4% above and below the knee, above the ankle, and at the foot level, respectively. A statistically significant difference was noted at all the levels (p < .05), but above the ankle (p = .059). Regarding the ULL group, the mean CRR were 80.7, 60.7, 65.0 and 49.6% above and below the elbow, at wrist and at mid-hand, respectively. CRR were reported at all the levels but no statistical difference was noted. The number of episodes of cellulitis dropped significantly (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of VLNT+SAL in lymphedema grades IIb-III, with important implications for the clinical practice.

Evidence-Based Practice Guideline for the Management of Lymphedema Proposed by the Japanese Lymphedema Society

Background: Secondary lymphedema mostly occurs as an aftereffect of cancer treatment, and it is estimated that 100,000-150,000 patients are affected in Japan. An estimated 3500 patients, develop lymphedema of the lower and upper extremities each year secondary to uterine and breast cancer treatment. Medical reimbursement was first instituted in April 2008 by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan. Since 2008, we have developed guidelines regarding treatment options for patients with lymphedema based on scientific evidence. This is the third edition of the guidelines established by the Japanese Lymphedema Society (JLES), published in 2018. The JLES Practice Guideline-Making Committee (PGMC) developed 21 clinical questions (CQs). Methods and Results: A review of these 15 CQs was performed in accordance with the methodology for establishing clinical guidelines. The 15 recommendations for each of these CQs were developed and discussed until consensus by the PGMC was reached. Moreover, outside members who had no involvement in these guidelines evaluated the contents using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II reporting checklist. Conclusion: These guidelines have been produced for the adequate management of lymphedema by doctors and other medical staff on the lymphedema management team of medical institutes, including nurses, physical technicians, and occupational therapists.

Long-Term Outcomes of Lymph Node Transfer in Secondary Lymphedema and Its Correlation with Flap Characteristics

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to assess the impact of certain flap characteristics on long-term outcomes following microsurgical treatment in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) patients.

METHODS

Sixty-four out of 65 BCRL patients, guided by the "Selected Lymph Node" ("SeLyN") technique, underwent Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer (VLNT) between 2012 and 2018. According to their surface size, flaps were divided into small (<25 cm², n = 32) and large (>25 cm², n = 32). Twelve large and six small flaps were combined with free abdominally based breast reconstruction procedures. Lymphedema stage, flap size, vascular pedicle and number of lymph nodes (LNs) were analyzed in correlation with long-term Volume Differential Reduction (VDR).

RESULTS

At 36-month follow-up, no major complication was recorded in 64 cases; one flap failure was excluded from the study. Mean flap size was 27.4 cm², mean LNs/flap 3.3 and mean VDR 55.7%. Small and large flaps had 2.8 vs. 3.8 LNs/flap (p = 0.001), resulting in 49.6% vs. 61.8% VDR (p = 0.032), respectively. Lymphedema stage and vascular pedicle (SIEA or SCIA/SCIP) had no significant impact on VDR.

CONCLUSION

In our series, larger flaps included a higher number of functional LNs, directly associated with better outcomes as quantified by improved VDR.

Axilla versus Wrist as the Recipient Site in Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

 Vascularized lymph node transfers (VLNT) are being used with increasing frequency for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). However, there is a lack of consensus in the surgical field as to which recipient site should be utilized. We, therefore, aim to assess the evidence comparing the wrist and axilla as recipient sites for VLNT in BCRL.

METHODS

 We conducted a systematic literature review to compare the wrist and axilla as recipient sites for VLNT in BCRL. Demographic data, as well as circumference reduction rate (CRR), excess volume reduction (EVR), postoperative decrease in infections per year, postoperative discontinuation of compression garments, and overall pooled complication rate were extracted from included studies. These were compared through a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

 A total of 37 studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 689 patients. VLNTs to the wrist and axilla resulted in a decrease in CRR of 42.1 and 51.5%, and a decrease in EVR of 35.6 and 48.8%, respectively. However, our meta-analysis showed no significant differences between CRR or EVR and between wrist and axilla as recipient sites. Similarly, we found no differences in postoperative decrease in infections per year, postoperative discontinuation of compression garments, and overall pooled complication rate.

CONCLUSION

 These data suggest noninferiority between the wrist and axilla as recipient sites for VLNT in the context of BCRL. In the absence of randomized, prospective data, we hope these results can be used as an evidence-based reference and facilitate future studies.

Addressing common orthopaedic calamities with microsurgical solutions

Reconstructive microsurgery has been an essential aspect of orthopaedic surgery and extremity reconstruction since the introduction of the operating microscope in the mid-20^th century. The reconstructive ladder ranges from simple healing by secondary intention to complex procedures such as free tissue transfer and vascularized composite allotransplantation. As orthopaedic surgery has evolved over the past 60 years, so too have the reconstructive microsurgical skills that are often needed to address common orthopaedic surgery problems. In this article, we will discuss a variety of complex orthopaedic surgery scenarios ranging from trauma to infection to tumor resection as well as the spectrum of microsurgical solutions that can aid in their management.

Nanofibrillar Collagen Scaffold Enhances Edema Reduction and Formation of New Lymphatic Collectors after Lymphedema Surgery

BACKGROUND

Treatment of secondary lymphedema remains challenging, with suboptimal rates of edema reduction following physiologic procedures (i.e., lymphaticovenous anastomosis and vascularized lymph node transfer). The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term effect of a nanofibrillar collagen scaffold on edema reduction in lymphedema patients treated with lymphaticovenous anastomosis or vascularized lymph node transfer.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed, comparing stage 1 to 3 lymphedema patients who underwent lymphaticovenous anastomosis and/or vascularized lymph node transfer with or without delayed implantation of nanofibrillar collagen scaffold (BioBridge) from 2016 to 2019. The primary endpoint was excess volume reduction. Indocyanine green lymphatic mapping was performed to evaluate superficial lymphatic flow.

RESULTS

Edema reduction was significantly greater for the BioBridge cohort (12-month follow-up, n = 18) compared to controls (18.2-month follow-up, n = 11) (111.5 ± 34.5 percent versus 70.0 ± 19.0 percent; p = 0.0004). This held true in lymphaticovenous anastomosis and vascularized lymph node transfer subgroup analysis. The average rate of edema reduction increased by 3.5-fold in lymphaticovenous anastomosis and 7.6-fold in vascularized lymph node transfer following BioBridge placement. Eighty-eight percent of patients with concurrent liposuction and BioBridge implantation maintained normal volumes at 13 months postoperatively. Lymphatic mapping following BioBridge placement showed significantly more new lymphatic collectors and decreased dermal backflow. The majority of patients (77.8 percent) achieved and maintained normal limb volume at an average total follow-up of 29 months.

CONCLUSION

Nanofibrillar collagen scaffold implantation enhances overall effectiveness of physiologic procedures, even in the presence of liposuction, and is a promising adjunct therapy for treatment of lymphedema.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

A case report of RASA1-associated inherited lymphoedema with recurrent life-threatening lymphangitis

Background

Most cases of lymphoedema are secondary to other causes, while cases of primary lymphoedema, in particular that of congenital origin, are uncommon. Limited genetic disorders are so far known to be associated with lymphatic malformation including mutations in RASA1. This clinical case highlights the possible complications of RASA1-associated lymphatic malformation in a female suffering from recurrent life-threatening septic lymphangitis.

Case summary

A 23-year-old female patient presented with congenital lymphoedema of the lower right extremity. At the age of eight, she first suffered from an episode of lymphangitis. Thereafter, she developed recurrent episodes of lymphangitis predominately occurring during menstruation and culminating into severe and life-threatening septicaemias. Due to the menstrual association, endometriosis was suspected but could not be confirmed. Furthermore, angiography could not detect any sign of arteriovenous fistula. Single-Photon-Emission-Computed-Tomography confirmed absent major lymphatics of the right leg with severely impaired and prolonged dermal lymphatic backflow. Genetic testing identified a disease-causing variant in the RASA1 gene.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first case of recurrent septic lymphangitis with close relation to menstruation in a female with RASA1-associated lymphatic malformation. Due to the possible de novo or somatic origin of a pathogenic variant, a genetic disease should be considered in spite of an unremarkable family history or a localized lymphoedema. Although there is no curative therapy available yet, the knowledge of the underlying genetic defect is important for interdisciplinary patient care and might be crucial for individual molecular therapies in the future.

Intra-abdominal vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As a promising treatment for lymphedema, vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is associated with a risk of iatrogenic lymphedema. Intra-abdominal vascularized lymph node flap has been increasingly applied to minimize complication.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane databases were searched systematically. Clinical articles describing the application of intra-abdominal flaps to treat lymphedema were included. Study characteristics, patient demographics, and operative details were recorded. Primary outcomes were recorded as circumference/volume reduction, episodes of cellulitis reduction and lymph flow assessment. Secondary outcomes were recorded as donor-site complication and recipient-site complication.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria with 594 patients in total. Donor-sites of flaps were omental/gastroepiploic, jejunal, ileocecal, and appendicular. The mean reduction rate ranged from 0.38% to 70.8%. Significant reduction in infectious episodes was reported in 10 studies. The pooled donor-site complication rate was 1.4% (95% CI, 0%-4.1%; I²  = 40%). The pooled recipient-site complication rate was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.4%-5.5%; I²  = 39%). The most common donor-site complication was minor ileus requiring prolonged nasogastric tube replacement. No donor site lymph disfunction occurred.

CONCLUSION

Intra-abdominal VLNT is an effective technique for patients with lymphedema with no obvious impairment to donor-site lymph function, as long as the operation is properly performed.