Efficacy and safety assessment of lymphovenous anastomosis in patients with primary and secondary lymphoedema: A systematic review of prospective evidence

Improved lymphangiogenesis around vascularized lymph node flaps by periodic injection of hyaluronidase in a rodent model

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is an advanced surgical approach for secondary lymphedema (SLE) treatment, but tissue fibrosis around the lymph node flap (VLNF) inhibiting lymphangiogenesis is the biggest challenge undermining its therapeutic efficacy. This study explored the effects of periodic hyaluronidase (HLD) injection in reducing fibrosis and promoting lymphangiogenesis in 52 Sprague-Dawley rats with a VLNF over 13 weeks. The results demonstrated that HLD administration significantly enhanced swelling reduction, lymphatic drainage efficiency, and lymphatic vessel regeneration, with up to a 26% decrease in tissue fibrosis around the VLNF. These findings suggest that combining VLNT with periodic injections of HLD could substantially improve SLE treatment outcomes in clinical settings. It offers a promising direction for future therapeutic strategies and drug development aimed at increasing the efficacy of surgical treatment for SLE patients.

Lymphovenous anastomosis and complex decongestive therapy for severe deformed lymphedema with recurrent infection: A case report

BACKGROUND

Lower extremity lymphedema is a common complication following treatment for gynecological malignancies. Its incidence rate can reach up to 70%, affecting ~20 million people worldwide. However, specialized treatment centers are scarce, and there is a lack of consensus on treatment approaches. Furthermore, there are even fewer reports on the systematic and effective treatment of severe lymphedema with malformations. Effective management of this condition remains a significant challenge for clinicians.

CASE SUMMARY

A 40-year-old woman developed bilateral leg swelling 6 years after receiving treatment for endometrial cancer. Since August 2018, she experienced > 30 episodes of lymphangitis. Upon presentation, she exhibited bilateral leg swelling and deformation, with four large swellings in the posterior thigh that impeded movement, and pain in the limbs. Skin manifestations included lichenoid lesions and features of deep sclerosis. Radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy confirmed the diagnosis of lower limb lymphedema. After 6 mo of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) and three lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) treatments, the patient lost 49 kg in weight. She also experienced a maximum circumference reduction of 35.2 cm in the left lower limb and 37.5 cm in the right lower limb. The leg pain disappeared, her swelling significantly decreased, and she regained the ability to walk, cycle, and run normally.

CONCLUSION

The combined application of CDT and LVA therapy demonstrates significant positive effects in the treatment of severe, deformed stage III lymphedema.

Dutch Translation of the Yost Self-Report Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire in Women

BACKGROUND

Validated questionnaires of self-reported LEL are important in the assessment and diagnosis of LEL. The aim of this study was to validate and translate a Dutch version of the screening questionnaire, the LELSQ developed and validated by Yost et al. Methods: We tested the questionnaire on a group of healthy women and a group of patients diagnosed with LEL. The translation was carried out using the forward and backward method from English to Dutch.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

SPSS (IBM corp, Armonk, New York, NY, USA) version 28.0.1.0 (001) was used for statistical analysis in the process of validation. The internal consistency was assessed by determining Cronbach's alpha. The reliability was tested by test-retest reliability. The validity was determined by ROC analysis, and content and face validity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The internal consistency score in both groups had a strong value (0.83 to 0.90). The test-retest reliability was also strong in both groups. Face and content validity showed the LELSQ is an easy, understandable questionnaire that is not too time-consuming in the early detection of LEL. The ROC analysis showed an AUC value of 0.93, indicating strong validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The validated Dutch translation showed high values for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity, which allows us to implement the questionnaire in the early detection of LEL after gynecological cancer treatment.

Lymphatic failure and lymphatic interventions: Knowledge gaps and future directions for a new frontier in congenital heart disease

Lymphatic failure is a broad term that describes the lymphatic circulation's inability to adequately transport fluid and solutes out of the interstitium and into the systemic venous circulation, which can result in dysfunction and dysregulation of immune responses, dietary fat absorption, and fluid balance maintenance. Several investigations have recently elucidated the nexus between lymphatic failure and congenital heart disease, and the associated morbidity and mortality is now well-recognized. However, the precise pathophysiology and pathogenesis of lymphatic failure remains poorly understood and relatively understudied, and there are no targeted therapeutics or interventions to reliably prevent its development and progression. Thus, there is growing enthusiasm towards the development and application of novel percutaneous and surgical lymphatic interventions. Moreover, there is consensus that further investigations are needed to delineate the underlying mechanisms of lymphatic failure, which could help identify novel therapeutic targets and develop innovative procedures to improve the overall quality of life and survival of these patients. With these considerations, this review aims to provide an overview of the lymphatic circulation and its vasculature as it relates to current understandings into the pathophysiology and pathogenesis of lymphatic failure in patients with congenital heart disease, while also summarizing strategies for evaluating and managing lymphatic complications, as well as specific areas of interest for future translational and clinical research efforts.

Lymphedema Surgical Education and Faculty Demographics in United States Plastic Surgery Residency Programs

BACKGROUND

 Recent advancements in supermicrosurgery and promising preliminary outcomes have led to a surge in physiologic lymphedema surgery. This study is the first to evaluate lymphedema surgical education among U.S. plastic surgery residency programs, along with the background and experience of plastic surgeons subspecializing in the field.

METHODS

 Cross-sectional evaluation of 103 accredited U.S. plastic surgery residency programs was performed in January 2023. Web-based searches of program curricula, faculty profiles, and main institutional pages indicated whether a program provided nonclinical or clinical exposure to lymphedema surgery. Review of online faculty profiles, surname searches, Doximity, and Scopus determined the perceived demographics, academic productivity, and procedures performed by lymphedema surgeons.

RESULTS

 Compared with the 11 programs that incorporated lymphedema surgery into their online curriculum, 67 programs had a rotation site with a surgeon performing lymphedema procedures. Of the 33 programs without evidence of clinical exposure, 76% (n = 25) did not provide or specify providing elective time. Faculty perceived to be female or a race underrepresented in plastic surgery had significantly more assistant professor titles (p < 0.0214) and significantly fewer years of experience (p < 0.0293) than their counterparts.

CONCLUSION

 Great variation in lymphedema surgical education exists among U.S. plastic surgery residency programs. While few programs incorporate lymphedema surgery into their advertised curriculum, programs without clinical exposure frequently did not provide elective time to obtain it. Faculty that were female or a race underrepresented in plastic surgery were most often early in their career, suggesting lymphedema surgeons may grow increasingly diverse in years to come.

Improving quality of life after breast cancer: a comparison of two microsurgical treatment options for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL)

PURPOSE

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) entails the autologous relocation of lymph nodes to a lymphedematous region of the body, whereas lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) creates a direct bypass between the lymphatic and venous system. Both techniques are meant to lastingly bolster the local lymphatic drainage capacity. This study compared safety and effectiveness of VLNT and LVA in patients with chronic breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from our encrypted database composed of patients with chronic BCRL who were treated with either VLNT or LVA and had a minimum follow-up of two years. Patient-specific variables analyzed included pre- and postoperative arm circumferences, lymphedema stages and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 96 patients demonstrated a complete follow-up period of two years. The VLNT group displayed larger preoperative circumferential measurements, evident in both in the isolated examination of the affected arm, as well as when adjusted for the contralateral unaffected arm. Significant reduction in arm volume was achieved by both groups. However, VLNT demonstrated superior relative reduction rates than LVA, neutralizing any significant arm size disparities after 24 months. Surgery duration was slightly longer for VLNT than LVA. Postoperative complications, predominantly minor, were exclusively observed in the VLNT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VLNT and LVA offer significant improvement for patients suffering from chronic BCRL. VLNT shows an even greater potential for improvement in more severe cases of BCRL, but involves a higher risk for (mostly minor) complications.

The N-LVA Study: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) for patients with cancer who suffer from chronic peripheral lymphoedema - study protocol of a multicentre, randomised sham-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-related lymphoedema is one of the most debilitating side-effects of cancer treatment with an overall incidence of 15.5%. Patients may suffer from a variety of symptoms, possibly resulting in a diminished health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A microsurgical technique known as lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) might be a promising treatment option. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether LVA is effective and cost-effective compared with sham surgery in improving the HRQoL.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A multicentre, double-blind, randomised sham-controlled trial conducted in three university hospitals in the Netherlands. The study population comprises 110 patients over the age of 18 years with unilateral, peripheral cancer-related lymphoedema, including 70 patients with upper limb lymphoedema and 40 patients with lower limb lymphoedema. A total of 55 patients will undergo the LVA operation, while the remaining 55 will undergo sham surgery. The follow-up will be at least 24 months. Patients are encouraged to complete the follow-up by explaining the importance of the study. Furthermore, patients may benefit from regular monitoring moments for their lymphoedema. The primary outcome is the HRQoL. The secondary outcomes are the limb circumference, excess limb volume, changes in conservative therapy, postoperative complications, patency of the LVA and incremental cost-effectiveness.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center on 20 September 2023 (NL84169.068.23). The results will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed medical journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06082349.

The 6 month interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial assessing the quality of life in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis vs. conservative therapy

Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic condition with a detrimental impact on psychosocial and physical well-being. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis has shown promising results in alleviating physical symptoms and increasing quality of life in patients with BCRL. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect on health related quality of life (HrQol) after LVA surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with BCRL. The study is a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Adult women with unilateral BCRL, with early stage lymphedema and viable lymphatic vessels were included. The primary outcome measure was HrQol measured by the lymphedema functioning disability and health (Lymph-ICF) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were volume difference measured by the water displacement method; the Upper Extremity Lymphedema (UEL) index; and daily use of the compression garments after 3 and 6 months. For this interim analysis 46 patients per group were included. There was a significant improvement in the domains in physical and mental function in the Lymph-ICF questionnaire in the LVA group after 6 months, (- 16.46 ± 18.5, p < 0.05, - 10.12 ± 29.5, p < 0.05 respectively). However, there was no statistical difference in the total score of the Lymph-ICF after 6 months in both groups (LVA-group; - 8.57 ± 22.6, p > 0.05, CDT-group; - 2.65 ± 18.2, p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant volume reduction in both groups (LVA-group: 20.04 ± 196.40, p = 0.497, CDT: 33.98 ± 189.87, p = 0.236). In the LVA group, 41% partially of completely stopped wearing the compression garments after six months whereas in the CDT group 0% discontinued to use of compression garments. LVA resulted in improvement of the domains physical and mental function of the Lymph-ICF. Limb volume did not significantly improve after 6 months. However, around 42% could completely or partially stopped with the use of compression garments in the LVA group. The current results are promising, however longer follow up is required to assess long term effect of LVA for secondary lymphedema. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02790021 registered on 03/06/2016.

Impact and outcomes after lymphaticovenous anastomosis for 150 cases of lymphoedema followed up over 24 months

BACKGROUND

Lymphoedema is a chronic condition affecting daily activities of life, causing significant alterations and adjustments. Since 2015, lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been available on the National Health Service for people with lymphoedema in Wales, United Kingdom. This study aimed to explore the impact and outcomes after LVA over a 24-month follow-up.

METHODS

Data were prospectively captured before and after LVA surgery on 150 patients with unilateral upper or lower limb lymphoedema. The same team (three lymphoedema specialists and two plastic surgeons) assessed/operated on all patients. Data captured included a quality of life tool (EQ5D5L), circumferential measurements (tape measure/perometer), compression garment usage, occurrence of cellulitis and a range of patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

People who underwent LVA surgery had predominantly cancer-related lymphoedema (n = 118). Reviewing baseline data and 24-months after LVA, quality of life statistically improved (p = <0.005), as well as pain, heaviness, anxiety, impact on hobbies, work, purchasing clothes and intimacy/desirability. Mean perometer and circumferential measurements did not reduce over the 24 months. Number of days per week and hours that the patient wore compression garments did lessen and was statistically significant (p = <0.001). The quantity of cellulitis episodes captured from two years before and two years after LVA decreased from 4.22 to 0.10 (p = <0.001). Significant results (p = <0.001) were also found in a reduction in patients taking days off work due to cellulitis (5.81 to 0.16).

CONCLUSION

LVA resulted in significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures, cellulitis episodes and reduced need for compression garments. Limb circumference via tape measure/perometer did not alter, yet the patient's quality of life considerably improved.

LED-based photoacoustic imaging for preoperative visualization of lymphatic vessels in patients with secondary limb lymphedema

Lymphedema is the accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitium (i.e., dermal backflow (DBF)). Preoperative imaging of the lymphatic vessels is a prerequisite for lymphovenous bypass surgical planning. We investigated the visualization of lymphatic vessels and veins using light-emitting diode (LED)-based photoacoustic imaging (PAI). Indocyanine-green mediated near-infrared fluorescence lymphography (NIRF-L) was done in fifteen patients with secondary limb lymphedema. Photoacoustic images were acquired in locations where lymphatic vessels and DBF were observed with NIRF-L. We demonstrated that LED-based PAI can visualize and differentiate lymphatic vessels and veins even in the presence of DBF. We observed lymphatic and blood vessels up to depths of 8.3 and 8.6 mm, respectively. Superficial lymphatic vessels and veins can be visualized using LED-based PAI even in the presence of DBF showing the potential for pre-operative assessment. Further development of the technique is needed to improve its usability in clinical settings.

Treatment of multiple limb lymphedema with combined supermicrosurgical techniques

INTRODUCTION

Lymphedema surgery including lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) are effective treatments for lymphedema; however, treating multiple limbs in a single operation using both approaches has not been described. We hypothesize multiple limb lymphedema can be treated effectively in one operation.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Retrospective review of seven patients undergoing extreme lymphedema surgery (mean age: 53.2 years; range: 33-66 years) with an average BMI of 34.8 kg/m² (range: 17.6-53.6 kg/m² ). Two patients developed bilateral upper extremity (UE) lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment, three had bilateral lower extremity (LE) lymphedema, and two suffered from lymphedema of all four extremities due to breast cancer treatment.

RESULTS

One patient with bilateral UE lymphedema was treated with bilateral inguinal node transfers with LVA and the other with combined bilateral DIEP flaps and inguinal node transfers with LVA. Three patients had bilateral LE lymphedema: two were treated with split omental/gastroepiploic nodes, and one underwent simultaneous supraclavicular and submental node transfers. LVAs were performed in one leg in each patient. Two patients with four-limb lymphedema underwent bilateral inguinal node transfers with DIEP flaps and bilateral LE LVA. In total, there were eight UE and 10 LE treated. Average follow-up was 15.8 months (range: 12.6-28.4 months), all patients reported subjective improvement in symptoms, were able to decrease use of compression garments and pumps, and no patients developed cellulitis.

CONCLUSION

Patients suffering from lymphedema of multiple extremities can be treated safely and effectively combining both LVA and VLNT in a single operation.

Soft-Tissue Considerations in Shoulder Surgery in the Patient With Lymphedema

Lymphedema is a chronic, progressive, and often debilitating condition that results in swelling of the affected tissue. Secondary lymphedema is most commonly recognized by unilateral swelling of the ipsilateral extremity after the treatment of cancer. It is estimated that nearly 1.45 million women suffer from breast cancer-related lymphedema in the United States. The number of patients suffering from upper extremity lymphedema is expected to increase because multimodal treatment of breast cancer increases the long-term survival after diagnosis. Because this population ages, the likelihood of encountering a patient with concurrent lymphedema and shoulder pathology requiring orthopaedic intervention is likely to rise. A patient with an already edematous arm and/or impaired drainage of that arm is likely to have different and more complex intraoperative and postoperative courses than patients with normal lymphatic drainage. Although a lymphedematous arm should not preclude surgical intervention, there are considerations when approaching shoulder surgery in the setting of upper extremity lymphedema that may help mitigate complications and aid the patient in their orthopaedic recovery.

Long-term patency of multiple lymphatic-venous anastomoses in cancer-related lymphedema: A single center observational study

OBJECTIVES

Lymphedema is always initially treated by combined decongestive physiotherapy (CDP). Those cases, refractory to CDP, may be managed by surgical therapy. One of the most used microsurgical procedures is represented by the technique of lymphatic-venous anastomosis (LVA). But very few papers report long term results of LVA. The aim of this study is to assess the long-term patency of multiple lymphatic-venous anastomosis (MLVA) for the treatment of secondary lymphedemas.

METHODS

From January 2014 to December 2014, 101 patients (mean age: 56.94 ± 8.98 years; female/male: 86/15) affected by secondary cancer-related lymphedema (38 lower and 63 upper limbs) were treated by MLVA. All lymphedemas had previously been treated by conservative therapy without sustained results. Many patients (78%) had 1-3 episodes of acute lymphangitis/year. Lymphoscintigraphy, venous duplex-ultrasonography, and abdominal or axillary ultrasound investigation were performed preoperatively. MLVA patency was assessed by the lymphatic transport index (LyTI) and lymphoscintigraphic pattern.

RESULTS

At 1 year after surgery, excess volume reduction was 75%-90% in the early stage II secondary lymphedemas, and 60%-75% in the late stage II. The decrease in volume maintained stability in the 5-years follow-up period. Two more advanced lower and one upper limb lymphedemas had 45%-60% reduction. LyTI showed a significant decrease between the preoperative mean value (31.7 ± 9.43) and after 18 months from surgery (11.2 ± 1.91) (p < .001). MLVA patency was shown in 98 (97%) patients. No patients had evidence of postoperative lymphangitis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the long-term patency of MLVA in the treatment of cancer-related lymphedemas.

Using Lymphovenous Anastomosis and Lymph Node to Vein Anastomosis for Treatment of Posttraumatic Chylothorax with Increased Thoracic Duct Pressure in 3-Year-Old Child

Chylothorax is a rare disease and massive lymph fluid loss can cause life-threatening condition such as severe malnutrition, weight loss, and impaired immune system. If untreated, mortality rate of chylothorax can be up to 50%. This is a case report of a 3-year-old child with iatrogenic chylothorax. Despite conservative treatment and procedures, like perm catheter insertion, the patient failed to improve the respiratory symptoms over 3 months of period. As an alternative to surgical option, such as pleurodesis and thoracic duct ligation which has high complication rate, the patient underwent lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and lymph node to vein anastomosis (LNVA). Follow-up at fourth month showed clear lungs without breathing difficulty despite perm catheter removal. This is the first report to show the effectiveness of LVA and LNVA against iatrogenic chylothorax.

Lessons Learnt from an 11-year Experience with Lymphatic Surgery and a Systematic Review of Reported Complications: Technical Considerations to Reduce Morbidity

Complications experienced during lymphatic surgery have not been ubiquitously reported, and little has been described regarding how to prevent them. We present a review of complications reported during the surgical management of lymphedema and our experience with technical considerations to reduce morbidity from lymphatic surgery. A comprehensive search across different databases was conducted through November 2020. Based on the complications identified, we discussed the best approach for reducing the incidence of complications during lymphatic surgery based on our experience. The most common complications reported following lymphovenous anastomosis were re-exploration of the anastomosis, venous reflux, and surgical site infection. The most common complications using groin vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), submental VLNT, lateral thoracic VLNT, and supraclavicular VLNT included delayed wound healing, seroma and hematoma formation, lymphatic fluid leakage, iatrogenic lymphedema, soft-tissue infection, venous congestion, marginal nerve pseudoparalysis, and partial flap loss. Regarding intra-abdominal lymph node flaps, incisional hernia, hematoma, lymphatic fluid leakage, and postoperative ileus were commonly reported. Following suction-assisted lipectomy, significant blood loss and transient paresthesia were frequently reported. The reported complications of excisional procedures included soft-tissue infections, seroma and hematoma formation, skin-graft loss, significant blood loss, and minor skin flap necrosis. Evidently, lymphedema continues to represent a challenging condition; however, thorough patient selection, compliance with physiotherapy, and an experienced surgeon with adequate understanding of the lymphatic system can help maximize the safety of lymphatic surgery.

Primary Prevention of Cancer-Related Lymphedema Using Preventive Lymphatic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background  Several studies have proven prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) performed after lymphadenectomy can potentially reduce the risk of cancer-related lymphedema (CRL) without compromising the oncological treatment. We present a systematic review of the current evidence on the primary prevention of CRL using preventive lymphatic surgery (PLS). Patients and Methods  A comprehensive search across PubMed, Cochrane-EBMR, Web of Science, Ovid Medline (R) and in-process, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect was performed through December 2020. A meta-analysis with a random-effect method was accomplished. Results  Twenty-four studies including 1547 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, 830 prophylactic LVA procedures were performed after oncological treatment, of which 61 developed lymphedema. The pooled cumulative rate of upper extremity lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and PLS was 5.15% (95% CI, 2.9%-7.5%; p  < 0.01). The pooled cumulative rate of lower extremity lymphedema after oncological surgical treatment and PLS was 6.66% (95% CI < 1-13.4%, p-value = 0.5). Pooled analysis showed that PLS reduced the incidence of upper and lower limb lymphedema after lymph node dissection by 18.7 per 100 patients treated (risk difference [RD] - 18.7%, 95% CI - 29.5% to - 7.9%; p  < 0.001) and by 30.3 per 100 patients treated (RD - 30.3%, 95% CI - 46.5% to - 14%; p  < 0.001), respectively, versus no prophylactic lymphatic reconstruction. Conclusions  Low-quality studies and a high risk of bias halt the formulating of strong recommendations in favor of PLS, despite preliminary reports theoretically indicating that the inclusion of PLS may significantly decrease the incidence of CRL.

Indocyanine green lymphangiography is superior to clinical staging in breast cancer-related lymphedema

Precise staging of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is important to guide treatment-decision making. Recent studies have suggested staging of BCRL using indocyanine green lymphangiography (ICG-L) based on the extent of lymphatic injury and dermal backflow patterns. Currently, the benefits of ICG-L compared to conventional clinical staging are unknown. For this study, we included 200 patients with unilateral BCRL. All BCRL patients were staged using ICG-L and clinical exam. The amounts of excess arm volume, fat mass and lean mass were compared between stages using Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Multivariate regression models were used to adjust for confounders. For each increase in the patient's ICG-L stage, the excess arm volume, fat mass and lean mass was increased by 8, 12 and 6.5 percentage points respectively (P < 0.001). For each increase in the patient's clinical ISL stage, the volume was increased by 3.5 percentage points (P < 0.05), however no statistically significant difference in the lean and fat mass content of the arm was observed for ascending stages. However, the residual plots showed a high degree of variance for both ICG-L and clinical staging. This study found that ICG-L staging of BCRL was superior to clinical staging in forecasting BCRL excess arm volume, fat mass, and lean mass. However, there was a high degree of variance in excess arm volume, fat mass, and lean mass within each staging system, and neither the ICG-L nor clinical staging forecasted perfectly.

Pathological Changes in the Lymphatic System of Patients with Secondary Lower Limb Lymphedema Based on Single Photon-Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography/Lymphoscintigraphy Images

Background:

In patients with secondary upper limb lymphedema, positive correlations have been observed between the dermal back flow (DBF) type and visualization of lymph nodes around the clavicle, between the former and the lymph flow pathway type, and between the latter and the visualization of lymph nodes around the clavicle when using single photon-emission computed tomography/computed tomography/lymphoscintigraphy (SPECT-CT LSG).

Methods and Results:

We analyzed the associations between the visualization of inguinal lymph nodes, the lymph flow pathway type, and the DBF type using SPECT-CT LSG in 81 patients with unilateral secondary lower limb lymphedema by statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test. We revealed that the lymph flow pathways in the lower limb can be classified into nine types because the type in the lower leg is not always equal to the type in the thigh. Associations were observed between the visualization of inguinal lymph nodes and types of DBF (p < 0.01), between the types of lymph flow pathway in the thighs and visualization of the inguinal lymph nodes (p = 0.02), and between the lymph flow pathway types in the thighs and lower legs (p < 0.01).

Conclusion:

Detriment to the superficial lymph flow pathways in the lower limb appears to usually start from the proximal side, and deep pathways are considered to become dominant from a compensatory perspective as lymphedema severity increases.

Advances in Lymphedema

Lymphedema is a common, complex, and inexplicably underappreciated human disease. Despite a history of relative neglect by health care providers and by governmental health care agencies, the last decade has seen an explosive growth of insights into, and approaches to, the problem of human lymphedema. The current review highlights the significant advances that have occurred in the investigative and clinical approaches to lymphedema, particularly over the last decade. This review summarizes the progress that has been attained in the realms of genetics, lymphatic imaging, and lymphatic surgery. Newer molecular insights are explored, along with their relationship to future molecular therapeutics. Growing insights into the relationships among lymphedema, obesity, and other comorbidities are important to consider in current and future responses to patients with lymphedema.

The impact of lymphedema on health-related quality of life up to 10 years after breast cancer treatment

The impact of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) on long-term quality of life is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of BCRL on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 10 years after breast cancer treatment. This regional population-based study enrolled patients treated for breast cancer with axillary lymph node dissection between January 1st 2007 and December 31th 2017. Follow up and assessments of the included patients were conducted between January 2019 and May 2020. The study outcome was HRQoL, evaluated with the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire and the Short Form (36) Health Survey Questionnaire. Multivariate linear logistic regression models adjusted for confounders provided mean score differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals in each HRQoL scale and item. This study enrolled 244 patients with BCRL and 823 patients without BCRL. Patients with BCRL had significantly poorer HRQoL than patients without BCRL in 16 out of 18 HRQoL subscales, for example, in physical function (MDs 27, 95%CI: 24; 30), mental health (MDs 24, 95%CI: 21; 27) and social role functioning (MDs 20, 95%CI: 17; 23). Age, BMI, BCRL severity, hand and dominant arm affection had only minor impact on HRQoL (MDs < 5), suggesting a high degree of inter-individual variation in coping with lymphedema. This study showed that BCRL is associated with long-term impairments in HRQoL, especially affecting the physical and psychosocial domains. Surprisingly, BCRL diagnosis rather than clinical severity drove the largest impairments in HRQoL.

The Learning Curve: Trends in the First 100 Immediate Lymphatic Reconstructions Performed at a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related lymphedema will affect 10% to 50% of breast cancer survivors. Early data show that immediate lymphatic reconstruction may help prevent breast cancer lymphedema; however, the details have not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cohort of our first 100 patients for trends in demographics, treatment, and technique.

METHODS

At a tertiary care cancer center, high-risk breast cancer-related lymphedema patients underwent axillary reverse lymphatic mapping and immediate lymphatic reconstruction. After institutional review board approval, demographics, technique, and outcomes were recorded. The first 100 patients were analyzed to compare the differences between the first 50 versus the second 50 patient cohorts.

RESULTS

Of the first 100 axillary reverse lymphatic mapping performed, there was a significant difference in neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 81% in the earlier cohort versus 98% in the later cohort (P = 0.01). An arborized technique was used more frequently in the second cohort (82% vs 54%, P = 0.01). The incidence of lymphedema was lower in the latter cohort (7 patients vs 1 patient, P = 0.03). The first cohort was 12.2 times more likely to develop lymphedema despite lymphatic reconstruction than the second cohort (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The data demonstrate multiple trends in the learning curve associated with immediate lymphatic reconstruction at a single institution including improvements in identifying and dissecting lymphatic structures, performing more anastomoses per patient, using the arborized technique more frequently, performing the operation with shorter operative times, and reducing the incidence of lymphedema.

Prospective Validation of Indocyanine Green Lymphangiography Staging of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Simple Summary

Indocyanine green lymphangiography (ICG-L) allows real-time investigation of lymphatics; however, the applicability in evaluating breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is sparse and not well established. In this prospective study, we aimed to validate ICG-L assessment of BCRL in a large patient group. We found that evaluation of BCRL with ICG-L was easy and safe to perform in the outpatient clinic and provided unique disease information unobtainable by clinical assessment alone. Future studies that evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic treatments on lymphatic function morphology should incorporate lymphatic imaging as an outcome.

Abstract

Indocyanine green lymphangiography (ICG-L) allows real-time investigation of lymphatics. Plastic surgeons performing lymphatic reconstruction use the ICG-L for patient selection and stratification using the MD Anderson (MDA) and the Arm Dermal Backflow (ADB) grading systems. However, the applicability of ICG-L in evaluating breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is sparse and not well established. This study comprehensively examines the usability of ICG-L in the assessment of BCRL. We prospectively performed ICG-L in 237 BCRL patients between January 2019 and February 2020. The aim of this study was to assess the interrater and intrarater agreement and interscale consensus of ratings made using the MDA and ADB scales. Three independent raters performed a total of 2607 ICG-L assessments. The ICG-L stage for each grading system was correlated to the lymphedema volume to assess the agreement between the ICG-L stage and clinical severity. The interrater agreement was near perfect for the MDA scale (kappa 0.82–0.90) and the ADB scale (kappa 0.80–0.91). Similarly, we found a near-perfect intrarater agreement for the MDA scale (kappa 0.84–0.94) and the ADB scale (kappa 0.88–0.89). The agreement between the MDA and the ADB scales was substantial (kappa 0.65–0.68); however, the ADB scale systematically overestimated lower ICG-L stages compared to the MDA scale. The volume of lymphedema correlated slightly with MDA stage (Spearmans rho = 0.44, p < 0.001) and ADB stage (r_s = 0.35, p < 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred. The staging of BCRL with ICG-L is reliable, safe, and provides unique disease information unobtainable with clinical measurements alone. The MDA scale seems to provide better disease stratification compared to the ADB scale.

From Bench to Bedside: The Role of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Treating Patients with Lymphedema

Background: Lymphedema is a condition characterized by dysfunction of the lymphatic system resulting in chronic, progressive soft tissue edema that can negatively impact individuals' function, self-image, and quality of life. Understanding of the disease process has evolved significantly in the past two decades with advances in diagnostic modalities and surgical techniques revolutionizing prior treatment algorithms. Methods and Results: We reviewed our current approach at the University of Southern California to improving outcomes in lymphedema treatment. Given the complexity of this medical condition, patients are best served by a multidisciplinary approach. At our institution, this involves a collaborative effort between bench researchers, lymphatic therapists, medical physicians, and lymphedema surgeons. Basic science and translational research provide further understanding into the underlying mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis and the possibility for potential therapeutic interventions. Our surgical algorithms require patients to undergo a thorough diagnostic evaluation and consultation with certified lymphatic therapists prior to undergoing either physiologic or debulking operations. Patients are followed clinically following any interventions. Further community outreach and education is carried out in order to improve upon early diagnosis and symptom recognition. Conclusions: Optimizing lymphedema care requires a collaborative interplay between researchers, physicians, and therapists. Additionally, patient and provider education on early disease recognition and treatment options is an equally critical aspect of improving patient outcomes.

Evaluation and selection of lower limb lymphedema patients for lymphaticovenular anastomosis: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) with supramicrosurgical technique has recently gained popularity as a treatment method for patients with lymphedema. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate objective changes in leg volume in patients operated with LVA for lymphedema in the lower extremity, and to find positive predictors for the treatment method to facilitate the location of the venules and lymphatic vessels.

PATIENTS & METHODS

31 consecutive patients with lymphedema in the lower extremity and positive pitting test were examined with lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography. The causes of the lymphedema were either cancer or unknown cause/primary lymphedema. Fourteen of the patients with pathological lymphangiographic patterns were chosen for surgery and 12 of them were operated with one to four LVAs each. The lymphedema volume in the lower extremity was measured preoperatively, 6- and 12 months after surgery according to the truncated cone formula with the patient´s contralateral leg used as control. Ten patients had unilateral lymphedema and two patients had bilateral lymphedema.

RESULTS

Five of 12 patients showed between 1-8% edema reductions in the lower extremity after 12 months. With examination considering edema duration, number of anastomoses, radiotherapy and lymph node dissection we found a 6,2% difference in edema reduction between patients who had undergone lymph node dissection and those who had not (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study indicates that supramicrosurgery with LVA may reduce edema volumes, where the most distinctive positive predictor for edema reduction with LVAs was previous lymph node dissection.

Current operative management and therapeutic algorithm of lymphedema in the lower extremities

Lymphedema is defined as the abnormal accumulation of interstitial fluid in subcutaneous tissues resulting from cancer, cancer treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy), infection, inflammatory disorders, obesity, and hereditary syndromes. Surgical management of lymphedema can be broadly classified into two categories, reductive surgical techniques such as direct excision, suction assisted protein lipectomy (SAPL) or radical reduction with perforator preservation (RRPP); and physiological surgical procedures such as lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularised lymph node transfer (VLNT). These techniques and their various combinations were evaluated. The results revealed patients with reversible lymphedema (ISL stage I, mild severity) benefit most from physiological procedures (LVA or VLNT) which can reduce the chance of disease progression to the chronic, solid phase. Reductive techniques such as SAPL, RPPP, or direct excision procedures should be reserved for patients with advanced - severe lymphedema (ISL stages II and especially stage III) as the surgical treatment of choice. In this study, current literature on the surgical treatment of lower extremity lymphedema is reviewed and discussed in conjunction with authors' clinical experiences. An algorithm is presented, based on clinical evidence and experience which aims to provide a structured approach to managing lower limb lymphedema.

Outcomes following lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) for 100 cases of lymphedema: results over 24-months follow-up

PURPOSE

Lymphedema is a debilitating condition that significantly affects patient's quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes after lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) for extremity lymphedema.

METHODS

A single-center prospective study on upper and lower extremity lymphedema patients was performed. All LVA procedures were preceded by outpatient Indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography. Quality of life measured by the Lymph-ICF was the primary outcome. Limb circumference, use of compression garments, and frequency of cellulitis episodes and manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) sessions were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred consecutive patients, predominantly experiencing upper extremity lymphedema following breast cancer (n = 85), underwent a total of 132 LVAs. During a mean follow-up of 25 months, mean Lymph-ICF score significantly decreased from 43.9 preoperative to 30.6 postoperative, representing significant QoL improvement. Decrease in upper and lower limb circumference was observed in 52% of patients with a mean decrease of 6%. Overall mean circumference was not significantly different. Percentage of patients that could reduce compression garments in the upper and lower extremity group was 65% and 40%, respectively. Number of cellulitis episodes per year and MLD sessions per week showed a mean decrease of respectively 0.6 and 0.8 in the upper extremity and 0.4 and 1.0 in the lower extremity group.

CONCLUSIONS

LVA resulted in significant QoL improvement in upper and lower extremity lymphedema patients. Limb circumference did not significantly improve but good results concerning compression garments, cellulitis episodes, and MLD sessions were obtained. Additionally, a simple and patient-friendly method for outpatient ICG lymphography is presented.

Surgical management of lymphedema: a review of current literature

Lymphedema may be characterized by a progressive clinical course and limitations in improvement despite multi-modality treatment. In westernized countries, it most commonly presents as an undesirable complication of cancer treatment, particularly breast cancer. In the past several decades, surgical treatments for lymphedema have advanced, alongside developments in microsurgery. Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and lymph node transplantation are physiological therapies that may reduce lymphedema through addressing its route cause. Ablative techniques such as liposuction and subcutaneous excision aid in resolving the accumulation of proteinaceous adipose and fibrotic tissue seen in advanced lymphedema. The goal of this review is to examine the outcomes and limitations of current surgical techniques used in lymphedema management.

Efficacy and safety assessment of lymphovenous anastomosis in patients with primary and secondary lymphoedema: A systematic review of prospective evidence

Introduction

Lymphoedema is a chronic, debilitating condition caused by an affected lymphatic system. Supermicrosurgical techniques like lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) have gained popularity because of its minimal invasiveness, better aesthetic outcome, and lower costs in comparison to physical medicine. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of LVA in comparison to conservative or other surgical treatments for primary or secondary lymphoedema patients.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in four databases in December 2017. We applied a methodological framework based on the HTA Core Model®. According to the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) scheme, we synthesized the data on each selected outcome category. The studies were systematically assessed for risk of bias (RoB) using the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non‐randomized controlled studies (RoBANS) and the Institute of Health Economics (IHE) Risk of Bias checklist for case series.

Results

A total of 629 citations were identified and five studies were assessed eligible for final inclusion (one non‐randomized controlled trial and four prospective single‐arm studies). Across the studies, 217 patients were enrolled. All studies showed a moderate to high RoB. The strength of evidence for the effectiveness and safety of LVA is “very low.” Due to the methodological shortcomings of the available evidence, no conclusions can be made about the effectiveness of the procedure.

Conclusion

LVA might be a safe technique for patients with primary and secondary lymphoedema—particularly because no serious complications were reported. Furthermore, LVA may have a role in the prevention of lymphoedema.