pH and Heat Resistance of the Major Celery Allergen Api g 1

The History and Science of the Major Birch Pollen Allergen Bet v 1

The term allergy was coined in 1906 by the Austrian scientist and pediatrician Clemens Freiherr von Pirquet. In 1976, Dietrich Kraft became the head of the Allergy and Immunology Research Group at the Department of General and Experimental Pathology of the University of Vienna. In 1983, Kraft proposed to replace natural extracts used in allergy diagnostic tests and vaccines with recombinant allergen molecules and persuaded Michael Breitenbach to contribute his expertise in molecular cloning as one of the mentors of this project. Thus, the foundation for the Vienna School of Molecular Allergology was laid. With the recruitment of Heimo Breiteneder as a young molecular biology researcher, the work began in earnest, resulting in the publication of the cloning of the first plant allergen Bet v 1 in 1989. Bet v 1 has become the subject of a very large number of basic scientific as well as clinical studies. Bet v 1 is also the founding member of the large Bet v 1-like superfamily of proteins with members-based on the ancient conserved Bet v 1 fold-being present in all three domains of life, i.e., archaea, bacteria and eukaryotes. This suggests that the Bet v 1 fold most likely already existed in the last universal common ancestor. The biological function of this protein was probably related to lipid binding. However, during evolution, a functional diversity within the Bet v 1-like superfamily was established. The superfamily comprises 25 families, one of which is the Bet v 1 family, which in turn is composed of 11 subfamilies. One of these, the PR-10-like subfamily of proteins, contains almost all of the Bet v 1 homologous allergens from pollen and plant foods. Structural and functional comparisons of Bet v 1 and its non-allergenic homologs of the superfamily will pave the way for a deeper understanding of the allergic sensitization process.

Food Allergens of Plant Origin

This review presents an update on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of food allergens in plant sources, focusing on the few protein families that contribute to multiple food allergens from different species and protein families recently found to contain food allergens. The structures and structural components of the food allergens in the allergen families may provide further directions for discovering new food allergens. Answers as to what makes some food proteins allergens are still elusive. Factors to be considered in mitigating food allergens include the abundance of the protein in a food, the property of short stretches of the sequence of the protein that may constitute linear IgE binding epitopes, the structural properties of the protein, its stability to heat and digestion, the food matrix the protein is in, and the antimicrobial activity to the microbial flora of the human gastrointestinal tract. Additionally, recent data suggest that widely used techniques for mapping linear IgE binding epitopes need to be improved by incorporating positive controls, and methodologies for mapping conformational IgE binding epitopes need to be developed.

Expression and purification of 15N-labeled Fra a 1, a strawberry allergen, to prepare samples for NMR measurements

Raw strawberries contain allergens that cause oral allergic syndrome. Fra a 1 is one of the major allergens in strawberries and might decrease their allergenicity by heating, likely due to structural changes in the allergen leading to decreased recognition of the allergens in the oral cavity. In the present study, to understand the relationship between allergen structure and allergenicity, the expression and purification of 15N-labeled Fra a 1 were examined and the sample was used for NMR analysis. Two isoforms, Fra a 1.01 and Fra a 1.02, were used and expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) in M9 minimal medium. Fra a 1.02 was purified as a single protein by using the GST tag approach, whereas histidine×6-tag (his6-tag) Fra a 1.02 was obtained both as the full-length (∼20 kDa) and a truncated (∼18 kDa) form. On the other hand, his6-tag Fra a 1.01 was purified as a homogeneous protein. ¹⁵N-labeled HSQC NMR spectra suggested that Fra a 1.02 was thermally denatured at lower temperatures than Fra a 1.01, despite the high amino acid sequence homology (79.4%) of these isoforms. Furthermore, the samples in the present study allowed us to analyze ligand binding that probably affects structural stability. In conclusion, GST tag was effective for obtaining a homogeneous protein when his6-tag failed to give a single form, and the present study provided a sample that could be used for NMR studies of the details of the allergenicity and structure of Fra a 1.

Allergenicity and IgE Recognition of New Dau c 1 Allergens from Carrot

SCOPE

Carrot (Daucus carota) allergy is caused by the major carrot allergen Dau c 1, which is a mixture of several isoallergens and variants with sequence identities of >67% or >90%, respectively. However, little is known about the qualitative and quantitative composition of natural Dau c 1.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Mass spectrometry of isolated natural Dau c 1 reveals the existence of several yet unknown Dau c 1-like proteins. The study expresses four Dau c 1-like proteins in Escherichia coli. Two of the purified proteins, designated Dau c 1.0501 and 1.0601, exhibit sequence identities to Dau c 1.0101 and 1.0401 between 54% and 87%. They possess allergenic potential and are accepted as new isoallergens. One protein, designated as Dau c 1-like is >50% identical with the new isoallergens but exhibits no allergenicity. Sequence and structural comparisons of this protein with the known Dau c 1 isoallergens offer relevant clues about putative structural IgE epitopes.

CONCLUSION

Identification of new isoallergens and the identification of IgE epitopes may contribute to a more refined component resolved diagnosis and may lay ground for further epitope mapping and personalized targeted treatment approaches of carrot allergy in preclinical and clinical studies.

Can patients with oral allergy syndrome be at risk of anaphylaxis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Oral allergy syndrome, also known as pollen-food syndrome (PFS), is a condition usually associated with adults and characterized by mild transient oropharyngeal symptoms. The purpose of this review is to determine whether systemic or anaphylactic reactions do occur and if so, who is affected and what are the triggers.

RECENT FINDINGS

An increasing number of studies demonstrate that PFS occurs all age groups, and a significant number of affected adults do experience systemic and anaphylactic reactions. The upsurge in the adoption of vegan lifestyles, increase in consumption of fruits and vegetables including smoothies and juices, and use of plant foods in nutritional or body-building supplements, could exacerbate this. Changes in pollen and pollution levels, cofactors and sensitization to other plant food allergens may also be involved.

SUMMARY

While the majority of those with PFS will continue to experience mild symptoms, all individuals should be properly advised regarding the dangers of concentrated or unusual forms of plant food allergens such as smoothies, juices, soy/nut milks and nutritional supplements. Further well characterized studies are needed to determine risk factors for severe reactions, and sensitization patterns to pollens and plant food allergens.

Food Processing Does Not Abolish the Allergenicity of the Carrot Allergen Dau c 1: Influence of pH, Temperature, and the Food Matrix

SCOPE

The major carrot allergen Dau c 1 belongs to the group of pathogenesis related class 10 (PR-10) proteins and is homologous to the birch pollen allergen Bet v 1. In contrast to most other PR-10 allergens, Dau c 1 can elicit Bet v 1 independent sensitization. Although Dau c 1 is considered heat labile, allergic reactions against cooked carrots are possible.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The pH and temperature stability as well as the allergenic potential before and after treatment of purified natural (n) Dau c 1 and different recombinant (r) isoallergens is investigated: rDau c 1.0104, rDau c 1.0105, rDau c 1.0201, rDau c 1.0301. All proteins except rDau c 1.0201 are able to refold at physiological pH. pH conditions around the pI (4.4-5.5) or the presence of the carrot matrix reduce the refolding capacity. Below the pI, most isoallergens are heat resistant and still able to cause mediator release, indicating allergenicity. Moreover, cooked carrot extract is still able to provoke mediator release due to remaining soluble Dau c 1.

CONCLUSION

Patients allergic to carrots should avoid processed carrot containing foodstuff because heating or pH treatment do not completely abolish the allergenicity of Dau c 1.

Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: Role of Hidden Allergens and Cofactors

Food anaphylaxis is on the increase, with those who have an allergy to peanuts, tree nuts, milk, and seafood at the highest risk of developing such a reaction. However, the diet in many societies is increasingly varied, much of the food consumed is prepared outside the home, and meals are often composed of many different ingredients. Anaphylaxis may occur to a composite food, and it may be unclear whether the reaction is due to contamination or to a culprit allergen present in an added ingredient. Composite foods can contain many allergic proteins present in small amounts, which do not always have to be labeled, unless they feature in European or US labeling regulations. These "hidden" allergens include mustard, celery, spices, lupine, pea, natural food colourings, and preservatives, but can occasionally include allergenic material from contaminants such as cereal mites. Hidden allergens can provoke severe reactions to seemingly unconnected foods which might then lead to a diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis. The same problem can arise with two well-known types of food allergy; wheat-dependant exercise induced anaphylaxis and allergy to non-specific Lipid Transfer Protein allergens, both of which might only manifest when linked to a cofactor such as exercise. Many of these risk factors for food anaphylaxis have a common link; the public's engagement with popular concepts of health and fitness. This includes the development of a food and exercise culture involving the promotion and marketing of foods for their health-giving properties i.e., meat substitutes, wheat substitutes, supplements and alternative, or "natural" remedies for common ailments. Some of these foods have been reported as the cause of severe allergic reactions, but because they are often viewed as benign unlikely causes of severe allergic reactions, could be considered to be hidden allergens. The best resource to elicit the likelihood of a hidden allergen provoking an allergic reaction is to take a detailed history of the allergic reaction, presence of co-factors, foods suspected, type of food and where it was consumed. A good knowledge of commonly used ingredients, and list of potential hidden allergen suspects are essential tools for the food allergy detective.