1
|
Hardt JJ, Pryanichnikov AA, Homolka N, DeJongh EA, DeJongh DF, Cristoforetti R, Jäkel O, Seco J, Wahl N. The potential of mixed carbon-helium beams for online treatment verification: a simulation and treatment planning study. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:125028. [PMID: 38697212 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad46db] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Recently, a new and promising approach for range verification was proposed. This method requires the use of two different ion species. Due to their equal magnetic rigidity, fully ionized carbon and helium ions can be simultaneously accelerated in accelerators like synchrotrons. At sufficiently high treatment energies, helium ions can exit the patient distally, reaching approximately three times the range of carbon ions at an equal energy per nucleon. Therefore, the proposal involves adding a small helium fluence to the carbon ion beam and utilizing helium as an online range probe during radiation therapy. This work aims to develop a software framework for treatment planning and motion verification in range-guided radiation therapy using mixed carbon-helium beams.Approach.The developed framework is based on the open-source treatment planning toolkit matRad. Dose distributions and helium radiographs were simulated using the open-source Monte Carlo package TOPAS. Beam delivery system parameters were obtained from the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center, and imaging detectors along with reconstruction were facilitated by ProtonVDA. Methods for reconstructing the most likely patient positioning error scenarios and the motion phase of 4DCT are presented for prostate and lung cancer sites.Main results.The developed framework provides the capability to calculate and optimize treatment plans for mixed carbon-helium ion therapy. It can simulate the treatment process and generate helium radiographs for simulated patient geometry, including small beam views. Furthermore, motion reconstruction based on these radiographs seems possible with preliminary validation.Significance.The developed framework can be applied for further experimental work with the promising mixed carbon-helium ion implementation of range-guided radiotherapy. It offers opportunities for adaptation in particle therapy, improving dose accumulation, and enabling patient anatomy reconstruction during radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J Hardt
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander A Pryanichnikov
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Noa Homolka
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ethan A DeJongh
- ProtonVDA LLC, 1700 Park St Ste 208, Naperville, IL 60563, United States of America
| | - Don F DeJongh
- ProtonVDA LLC, 1700 Park St Ste 208, Naperville, IL 60563, United States of America
| | - Remo Cristoforetti
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niklas Wahl
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Metzner M, Zhevachevska D, Schlechter A, Kehrein F, Schlecker J, Murillo C, Brons S, Jäkel O, Martišíková M, Gehrke T. Energy painting: helium-beam radiography with thin detectors and multiple beam energies. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:055002. [PMID: 38295403 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad247e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Compact ion imaging systems based on thin detectors are a promising prospect for the clinical environment since they are easily integrated into the clinical workflow. Their measurement principle is based on energy deposition instead of the conventionally measured residual energy or range. Therefore, thin detectors are limited in the water-equivalent thickness range they can image with high precision. This article presents ourenergy paintingmethod, which has been developed to render high precision imaging with thin detectors feasible even for objects with larger, clinically relevant water-equivalent thickness (WET) ranges.Approach.A detection system exclusively based on pixelated silicon Timepix detectors was used at the Heidelberg ion-beam therapy center to track single helium ions and measure their energy deposition behind the imaged object. Calibration curves were established for five initial beam energies to relate the measured energy deposition to WET. They were evaluated regarding their accuracy, precision and temporal stability. Furthermore, a 60 mm × 12 mm region of a wedge phantom was imaged quantitatively exploiting the calibrated energies and five different mono-energetic images. These mono-energetic images were combined in a pixel-by-pixel manner by averaging the WET-data weighted according to their single-ion WET precision (SIWP) and the number of contributing ions.Main result.A quantitative helium-beam radiograph of the wedge phantom with an average SIWP of 1.82(5) % over the entire WET interval from 150 mm to 220 mm was obtained. Compared to the previously used methodology, the SIWP improved by a factor of 2.49 ± 0.16. The relative stopping power value of the wedge derived from the energy-painted image matches the result from range pullback measurements with a relative deviation of only 0.4 %.Significance.The proposed method overcomes the insufficient precision for wide WET ranges when employing detection systems with thin detectors. Applying this method is an important prerequisite for imaging of patients. Hence, it advances detection systems based on energy deposition measurements towards clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margareta Metzner
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daria Zhevachevska
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Germany
- Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annika Schlechter
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Kehrein
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julian Schlecker
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Radiooncology/Radiobiology, Germany
| | - Carlos Murillo
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Radiation Oncology - Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Radiation Oncology - Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mária Martišíková
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Germany
| | - Tim Gehrke
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ekinci F, Acici K, Asuroglu T, Emek Soylu B. MC TRIM Algorithm in Mandibula Phantom in Helium Therapy. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2523. [PMID: 37761719 PMCID: PMC10530776 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Helium ion beam therapy, one of the particle therapies developed and studied in the 1950s for cancer treatment, resulted in clinical trials starting at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in 1975. While proton and carbon ion therapies have been implemented in research institutions and hospitals globally after the end of the trials, progress in comprehending the physical, biological, and clinical findings of helium ion beam therapy has been limited, particularly due to its limited accessibility. Ongoing efforts aim to establish programs that evaluate the use of helium ion beams for clinical and research purposes, especially in the treatment of sensitive clinical cases. Additionally, helium ions have superior physical properties to proton beams, such as lower lateral scattering and larger LET. Moreover, they exhibit similar physical characteristics to carbon, oxygen, and neon ions, which are all used in heavy ion therapy. However, they demonstrate a sharper lateral penumbra with a lower radiobiological absence of certainties and lack the degradation of variations in dose distributions caused by excessive fragmenting of heavier-ion beams, especially at greater depths of penetration. In this context, the status and the prospective advancements of helium ion therapy are examined by investigating ionization, recoil, and lateral scattering values using MC TRIM algorithms in mandible plate phantoms designed from both tissue and previously studied biomaterials, providing an overview for dental cancer treatment. An average difference of 1.9% in the Bragg peak positions and 0.211 mm in lateral scattering was observed in both phantoms. Therefore, it is suggested that the 4He ion beam can be used in the treatment of mandibular tumors, and experimental research is recommended using the proposed biomaterial mandible plate phantom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Ekinci
- Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey;
| | - Koray Acici
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey
| | - Tunc Asuroglu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland
| | - Busra Emek Soylu
- Computer Engineering Department, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mairani A, Mein S, Blakely E, Debus J, Durante M, Ferrari A, Fuchs H, Georg D, Grosshans DR, Guan F, Haberer T, Harrabi S, Horst F, Inaniwa T, Karger CP, Mohan R, Paganetti H, Parodi K, Sala P, Schuy C, Tessonnier T, Titt U, Weber U. Roadmap: helium ion therapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35395649 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac65d3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Helium ion beam therapy for the treatment of cancer was one of several developed and studied particle treatments in the 1950s, leading to clinical trials beginning in 1975 at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The trial shutdown was followed by decades of research and clinical silence on the topic while proton and carbon ion therapy made debuts at research facilities and academic hospitals worldwide. The lack of progression in understanding the principle facets of helium ion beam therapy in terms of physics, biological and clinical findings persists today, mainly attributable to its highly limited availability. Despite this major setback, there is an increasing focus on evaluating and establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams, with both therapy and imaging initiatives to supplement the clinical palette of radiotherapy in the treatment of aggressive disease and sensitive clinical cases. Moreover, due its intermediate physical and radio-biological properties between proton and carbon ion beams, helium ions may provide a streamlined economic steppingstone towards an era of widespread use of different particle species in light and heavy ion therapy. With respect to the clinical proton beams, helium ions exhibit superior physical properties such as reduced lateral scattering and range straggling with higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LETd) ranging from ∼4 keVμm-1to ∼40 keVμm-1. In the frame of heavy ion therapy using carbon, oxygen or neon ions, where LETdincreases beyond 100 keVμm-1, helium ions exhibit similar physical attributes such as a sharp lateral penumbra, however, with reduced radio-biological uncertainties and without potentially spoiling dose distributions due to excess fragmentation of heavier ion beams, particularly for higher penetration depths. This roadmap presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art and future directions of helium ion therapy: understanding physics and improving modeling, understanding biology and improving modeling, imaging techniques using helium ions and refining and establishing clinical approaches and aims from learned experience with protons. These topics are organized and presented into three main sections, outlining current and future tasks in establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams-A. Physics B. Biological and C. Clinical Perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stewart Mein
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleanor Blakely
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States of America
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany.,Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alfredo Ferrari
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Fuchs
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.,MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.,MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - David R Grosshans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Fada Guan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, United States of America
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Horst
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.,Medical Physics Laboratory, Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Christian P Karger
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Radhe Mohan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Katia Parodi
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Munich, Germany
| | - Paola Sala
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Schuy
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Titt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ulrich Weber
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Knobloch C, Metzner M, Kehrein F, Schömers C, Scheloske S, Brons S, Hermann R, Peters A, Jäkel O, Martišíková M, Gehrke T. Experimental helium-beam radiography with a high-energy beam: Water-equivalent thickness calibration and first image-quality results. Med Phys 2022; 49:5347-5362. [PMID: 35670033 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A clinical implementation of ion-beam radiography (iRad) is envisaged to provide a method for on-couch verification of ion-beam treatment plans. The aim of this work is to introduce and evaluate a method for quantitative water-equivalent thickness (WET) measurements for a specific helium-ion imaging system for WETs that are relevant for imaging thicker body parts in the future. METHODS Helium-beam radiographs (αRads) are measured at the Heidelberg Ion-beam Therapy Center (HIT) with an initial beam energy of 239.5 MeV/ u. An imaging system based on three pairs of thin silicon pixel detectors is used for ion path reconstruction and measuring the energy deposition (dE) of each particle behind the object to be imaged. The dE behind homogeneous plastic blocks is related to their well-known WETs between 280.6mm and 312.6 mm with a calibration curve that is created by fitting the measured data points. The quality of the quantitative WET measurements is determined by the uncertainty of the measured WET of a single ion (single-ion WET precision) and the deviation of a measured WET value to the well-known WET (WET accuracy). Subsequently, the fitted calibration curve is applied to an energy deposition radiograph of a phantom with a complex geometry. The spatial resolution (modulation transfer function at 10% (MTF10% )) and WET accuracy (mean absolute percentage difference (MAPD)) of the WET map, are determined. RESULTS In the optimal imaging WET-range from ∼ 280 mm to 300 mm, the fitted calibration curve reached a mean single-ion WET precision of 1.55 ± 0.00%. Applying the calibration to an ion radiograph (iRad) of a more complex WET distribution, the spatial resolution was determined to be MTF10% = 0.49 ± 0.03 lp/mm and the WET accuracy was assessed as MAPD to 0.21%. CONCLUSIONS Using a beam energy of 239.5MeV/ u and the proposed calibration procedure, quantitative αRads of WETs between ∼ 280mm to 300 mm can be measured and show high potential for clinical use. The proposed approach with the resulting image qualities encourages further investigation towards the clinical application of helium-beam radiography. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Knobloch
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Metzner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F Kehrein
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Schömers
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Scheloske
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Hermann
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Applied Physics, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - A Peters
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - O Jäkel
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Martišíková
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Gehrke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Volz L, Collins-Fekete CA, Bär E, Brons S, Graeff C, Johnson RP, Runz A, Sarosiek C, Schulte RW, Seco J. The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:10.1088/1361-6560/ac33ec. [PMID: 34706355 PMCID: PMC8792995 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac33ec] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
This work provides a quantitative assessment of helium ion CT (HeCT) for particle therapy treatment planning. For the first time, HeCT based range prediction accuracy in a heterogeneous tissue phantom is presented and compared to single-energy x-ray CT (SECT), dual-energy x-ray CT (DECT) and proton CT (pCT). HeCT and pCT scans were acquired using the US pCT collaboration prototype particle CT scanner at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. SECT and DECT scans were done with a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash and converted to RSP. A Catphan CTP404 module was used to study the RSP accuracy of HeCT. A custom phantom of 20 cm diameter containing several tissue equivalent plastic cubes was used to assess the spatial resolution of HeCT and compare it to DECT. A clinically realistic heterogeneous tissue phantom was constructed using cranial slices from a pig head placed inside a cylindrical phantom (ø150 mm). A proton beam (84.67 mm range) depth-dose measurement was acquired using a stack of GafchromicTM EBT-XD films in a central dosimetry insert in the phantom. CT scans of the phantom were acquired with each modality, and proton depth-dose estimates were simulated based on the reconstructions. The RSP accuracy of HeCT for the plastic phantom was found to be 0.3 ± 0.1%. The spatial resolution for HeCT of the cube phantom was 5.9 ± 0.4 lp cm-1for central, and 7.6 ± 0.8 lp cm-1for peripheral cubes, comparable to DECT spatial resolution (7.7 ± 0.3 lp cm-1and 7.4 ± 0.2 lp cm-1, respectively). For the pig head, HeCT, SECT, DECT and pCT predicted range accuracy was 0.25%, -1.40%, -0.45% and 0.39%, respectively. In this study, HeCT acquired with a prototype system showed potential for particle therapy treatment planning, offering RSP accuracy, spatial resolution, and range prediction accuracy comparable to that achieved with a commercial DECT scanner. Still, technical improvements of HeCT are needed to enable clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Volz
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C-A Collins-Fekete
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - E Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Universitäts Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Graeff
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - R P Johnson
- Department of Physics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States of America
| | - A Runz
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Therapy, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Sarosiek
- Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, United States of America
| | - R W Schulte
- Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, United States of America
| | - J Seco
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pettersen HES, Aehle M, Alme J, Barnaföldi GG, Borshchov V, van den Brink A, Chaar M, Eikeland V, Feofilov G, Garth C, Gauger NR, Genov G, Grøttvik O, Helstrup H, Igolkin S, Keidel R, Kobdaj C, Kortus T, Leonhardt V, Mehendale S, Mulawade RN, Odland OH, Papp G, Peitzmann T, Piersimoni P, Protsenko M, Rehman AU, Richter M, Santana J, Schilling A, Seco J, Songmoolnak A, Sølie JR, Tambave G, Tymchuk I, Ullaland K, Varga-Kofarago M, Volz L, Wagner B, Wendzel S, Wiebel A, Xiao R, Yang S, Yokoyama H, Zillien S, Röhrich D. Investigating particle track topology for range telescopes in particle radiography using convolutional neural networks. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1413-1418. [PMID: 34259117 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1949037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton computed tomography (pCT) and radiography (pRad) are proposed modalities for improved treatment plan accuracy and in situ treatment validation in proton therapy. The pCT system of the Bergen pCT collaboration is able to handle very high particle intensities by means of track reconstruction. However, incorrectly reconstructed and secondary tracks degrade the image quality. We have investigated whether a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based filter is able to improve the image quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS The CNN was trained by simulation and reconstruction of tens of millions of proton and helium tracks. The CNN filter was then compared to simple energy loss threshold methods using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC), and by comparing the image quality and Water Equivalent Path Length (WEPL) error of proton and helium radiographs filtered with the same methods. RESULTS The CNN method led to a considerable improvement of the AUROC, from 74.3% to 97.5% with protons and from 94.2% to 99.5% with helium. The CNN filtering reduced the WEPL error in the helium radiograph from 1.03 mm to 0.93 mm while no improvement was seen in the CNN filtered pRads. CONCLUSION The CNN improved the filtering of proton and helium tracks. Only in the helium radiograph did this lead to improved image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Max Aehle
- Chair for Scientific Computing, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Johan Alme
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Mamdouh Chaar
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Viljar Eikeland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Grigory Feofilov
- Department of High Energy and Elementary Particles Physics, St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Christoph Garth
- Scientific Visualization Lab, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Nicolas R. Gauger
- Chair for Scientific Computing, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Georgi Genov
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ola Grøttvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Håvard Helstrup
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sergey Igolkin
- Department of High Energy and Elementary Particles Physics, St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Ralf Keidel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Chinorat Kobdaj
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Tobias Kortus
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Viktor Leonhardt
- Scientific Visualization Lab, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Shruti Mehendale
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Raju Ningappa Mulawade
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Odd Harald Odland
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Gábor Papp
- Institute for Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas Peitzmann
- Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Maksym Protsenko
- Research and Production Enterprise “LTU” (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Attiq Ur Rehman
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Joshua Santana
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Schilling
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arnon Songmoolnak
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Jarle Rambo Sølie
- Department of Diagnostic Physics, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ganesh Tambave
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ihor Tymchuk
- Research and Production Enterprise “LTU” (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Kjetil Ullaland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Lennart Volz
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Boris Wagner
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Steffen Wendzel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Wiebel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - RenZheng Xiao
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- College of Mechanical & Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shiming Yang
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hiroki Yokoyama
- Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Zillien
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Dieter Röhrich
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Collins-Fekete CA, Dikaios N, Bär E, Evans PM. Statistical limitations in ion imaging. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33711829 PMCID: PMC8112161 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abee57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the capacity of various ion beams available for radiotherapy to produce high quality relative stopping power map acquired from energy-loss measurements. The image quality metrics chosen to compare the different ions were signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as a function of dose and spatial resolution. Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations were performed for: hydrogen, helium, lithium, boron and carbon ion beams crossing a 20 cm diameter water phantom to determine SNR and spatial resolution. It has been found that protons possess a significantly larger SNR when compared with other ions at a fixed range (up to 36% higher than helium) due to the proton nuclear stability and low dose per primary. However, it also yields the lowest spatial resolution against all other ions, with a resolution lowered by a factor 4 compared to that of carbon imaging, for a beam with the same initial range. When comparing for a fixed spatial resolution of 10 lp cm−1, carbon ions produce the highest image quality metrics with proton ions producing the lowest. In conclusion, it has been found that no ion can maximize all image quality metrics simultaneously and that a choice must be made between spatial resolution, SNR, and dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, United Kingdom.,Chemical, Medical and Environmental Science, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolaos Dikaios
- Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Esther Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philip M Evans
- Chemical, Medical and Environmental Science, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, United Kingdom.,Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meyer S, Pinto M, Parodi K, Gianoli C. The impact of path estimates in iterative ion CT reconstructions for clinical-like cases. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33765672 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf1ff] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Ion computed tomography (CT) promises to mitigate range uncertainties inherent in the conversion of x-ray Hounsfield units into ion relative stopping power (RSP) for ion beam therapy treatment planning. To improve accuracy and spatial resolution of ion CT by accounting for statistical multiple Coulomb scattering deflection of the ion trajectories from a straight line path (SLP), the most likely path (MLP) and the cubic spline path (CSP) have been proposed. In this work, we use FLUKA Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the impact of these path estimates in iterative tomographic reconstruction algorithms for proton, helium and carbon ions. To this end the ordered subset simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique was used and coupled with a total variation superiorization (TVS). We evaluate the image quality and dose calculation accuracy in proton therapy treatment planning of cranial patient anatomies. CSP and MLP generally yielded nearly equal image quality with an average RSP relative error improvement over the SLP of 0.6%, 0.3% and 0.3% for proton, helium and carbon ion CT, respectively. Bone and low density materials have been identified as regions of largest enhancement in RSP accuracy. Nevertheless, only minor differences in dose calculation results were observed between the different models and relative range errors of better than 0.5% were obtained in all cases. Largest improvements were found for proton CT in complex scenarios with strong heterogeneities along the beam path. The additional TVS provided substantially reduced image noise, resulting in improved image quality in particular for soft tissue regions. Employing the CSP and MLP for iterative ion CT reconstructions enabled improved image quality over the SLP even in realistic and heterogeneous patient anatomy. However, only limited benefit in dose calculation accuracy was obtained even though an ideal detector system was simulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Meyer
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States of America.,Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany
| | - Marco Pinto
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany.,Shared senior authorship
| | - Chiara Gianoli
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany.,Shared senior authorship
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pettersen HES, Volz L, Sølie JR, Alme J, Barnaföldi GG, Barthel R, van den Brink A, Borshchov V, Chaar M, Eikeland V, Genov G, Grøttvik O, Helstrup H, Keidel R, Kobdaj C, van der Kolk N, Mehendale S, Meric I, Harald Odland O, Papp G, Peitzmann T, Piersimoni P, Protsenko M, Ur Rehman A, Richter M, Tefre Samnøy A, Seco J, Shafiee H, Songmoolnak A, Tambave G, Tymchuk I, Ullaland K, Varga-Kofarago M, Wagner B, Xiao R, Yang S, Yokoyama H, Röhrich D. Helium radiography with a digital tracking calorimeter-a Monte Carlo study for secondary track rejection. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:035004. [PMID: 33181502 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abca03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy using protons and heavier ions is a fast-growing therapeutic option for cancer patients. A clinical system for particle imaging in particle therapy would enable online patient position verification, estimation of the dose deposition through range monitoring and a reduction of uncertainties in the calculation of the relative stopping power of the patient. Several prototype imaging modalities offer radiography and computed tomography using protons and heavy ions. A Digital Tracking Calorimeter (DTC), currently under development, has been proposed as one such detector. In the DTC 43 longitudinal layers of laterally stacked ALPIDE CMOS monolithic active pixel sensor chips are able to reconstruct a large number of simultaneously recorded proton tracks. In this study, we explored the capability of the DTC for helium imaging which offers favorable spatial resolution over proton imaging. Helium ions exhibit a larger cross section for inelastic nuclear interactions, increasing the number of produced secondaries in the imaged object and in the detector itself. To that end, a filtering process able to remove a large fraction of the secondaries was identified, and the track reconstruction process was adapted for helium ions. By filtering on the energy loss along the tracks, on the incoming angle and on the particle ranges, 97.5% of the secondaries were removed. After passing through 16 cm water, 50.0% of the primary helium ions survived; after the proposed filtering 42.4% of the primaries remained; finally after subsequent image reconstruction 31% of the primaries remained. Helium track reconstruction leads to more track matching errors compared to protons due to the increased available focus strength of the helium beam. In a head phantom radiograph, the Water Equivalent Path Length error envelope was 1.0 mm for helium and 1.1 mm for protons. This accuracy is expected to be sufficient for helium imaging for pre-treatment verification purposes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Meyer S, Bortfeldt J, Lämmer P, Englbrecht FS, Pinto M, Schnürle K, Würl M, Parodi K. Optimization and performance study of a proton CT system for pre-clinical small animal imaging. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 65:155008. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab8afc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
12
|
Kopp B, Meyer S, Gianoli C, Magallanes L, Voss B, Brons S, Parodi K. Experimental comparison of clinically used ion beams for imaging applications using a range telescope. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 65:155004. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab87f6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
13
|
Volz L, Collins-Fekete CA, Sølie JR, Seco J. Theoretical considerations on the spatial resolution limit of single-event particle radiography. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2020; 6:055002. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab9c3f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
14
|
Amato C, Martisikova M, Gehrke T. A technique for spatial resolution improvement in helium‐beam radiography. Med Phys 2020; 47:2212-2221. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C. Amato
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Physics University of Pisa Pisa Italy
| | - M. Martisikova
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
| | - T. Gehrke
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Parodi K, Polf JC. In vivo range verification in particle therapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:e1036-e1050. [PMID: 30421803 PMCID: PMC6262833 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Exploitation of the full potential offered by ion beams in clinical practice is still hampered by several sources of treatment uncertainties, particularly related to the limitations of our ability to locate the position of the Bragg peak in the tumor. To this end, several efforts are ongoing to improve the characterization of patient position, anatomy, and tissue stopping power properties prior to treatment as well as to enable in vivo verification of the actual dose delivery, or at least beam range, during or shortly after treatment. This contribution critically reviews methods under development or clinical testing for verification of ion therapy, based on pretreatment range and tissue probing as well as the detection of secondary emissions or physiological changes during and after treatment, trying to disentangle approaches of general applicability from those more specific to certain anatomical locations. Moreover, it discusses future directions, which could benefit from an integration of multiple modalities or address novel exploitation of the measurable signals for biologically adapted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical PhysicsLudwig‐Maximilians‐Universität MünchenAm Coulombwall 1Garching b. Munich85748Germany
| | - Jerimy C. Polf
- Deparment of Radiation OncologyMaryland Proton Treatment CenterUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine22 South Greene St.BaltimoreMD21201USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Volz L, Piersimoni P, Bashkirov VA, Brons S, Collins-Fekete CA, Johnson RP, Schulte RW, Seco J. The impact of secondary fragments on the image quality of helium ion imaging. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:195016. [PMID: 30183679 PMCID: PMC6380898 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aadf25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Single-event ion imaging enables the direct reconstruction of the relative stopping power (RSP) information required for ion-beam therapy. Helium ions were recently hypothesized to be the optimal species for such technique. The purpose of this work is to investigate the effect of secondary fragments on the image quality of helium CT (HeCT) and to assess the performance of a prototype proton CT (pCT) scanner when operated with helium beams in Monte Carlo simulations and experiment. Experiments were conducted installing the U.S. pCT consortium prototype scanner at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Simulations were performed with the scanner using the TOPAS toolkit. HeCT images were reconstructed for a cylindrical water phantom, the CTP404 (sensitometry), and the CTP528 (line-pair) [Formula: see text] ® modules. To identify and remove individual events caused by fragmentation, the multistage energy detector of the scanner was adapted to function as a [Formula: see text] telescope. The use of the developed filter eliminated the otherwise arising ring artifacts in the HeCT reconstructed images. For the HeCT reconstructed images of a water phantom, the maximum RSP error was improved by almost a factor 8 with respect to unfiltered images in the simulation and a factor 10 in the experiment. Similarly, for the CTP404 module, the mean RSP accuracy improved by a factor 6 in both the simulation and the experiment when the filter was applied (mean relative error 0.40% in simulation, 0.45% in experiment). In the evaluation of the spatial resolution through the CTP528 module, the main effect of the filter was noise reduction. For both simulated and experimental images the spatial resolution was ∼4 lp cm-1. In conclusion, the novel filter developed for secondary fragments proved to be effective in improving the visual quality and RSP accuracy of the reconstructed images. With the filter, the pCT scanner is capable of accurate HeCT imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennart Volz
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. These authors contributed equally to this work
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Martišíková M, Gehrke T, Berke S, Aricò G, Jäkel O. Helium ion beam imaging for image guided ion radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:109. [PMID: 29898746 PMCID: PMC6000951 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1046-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ion beam radiotherapy provides potential for increased dose conformation to the target volume. To translate it into a clinical advantage, it is necessary to guarantee a precise alignment of the actual internal patient geometry with the treatment beam. This is in particular challenging for inter- and intrafractional variations, including movement. Ion beams have the potential for a high sensitivity imaging of the patient geometry. However, the research on suitable imaging methods is not conclusive yet. Here we summarize the research activities within the "Clinical research group heavy ion therapy" funded by the DFG (KFO214). Our aim was to develop a method for the visualization of a 1 mm thickness difference with a spatial resolution of about 1 mm at clinically applicable doses. METHODS We designed and built a dedicated system prototype for ion radiography using exclusively the pixelated semiconductor technology Timepix developed at CERN. Helium ions were chosen as imaging radiation due to their decreased scattering in comparison to protons, and lower damaging potential compared to carbon ions. The data acquisition procedure and a dedicated information processing algorithm were established. The performance of the method was evaluated at the ion beam therapy facility HIT in Germany with geometrical phantoms. The quality of the images was quantified by contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and spatial resolution (SR) considering the imaging dose. RESULTS Using the unique method for single ion identification, degradation of the images due to the inherent contamination of the outgoing beam with light secondary fragments (hydrogen) was avoided. We demonstrated experimentally that the developed data processing increases the CNR by 350%. Consideration of the measured ion track directions improved the SR by 150%. Compared to proton radiographs at the same dose, helium radiographs exhibited 50% higher SR (0.56 ± 0.04lp/mm vs. 0.37 ± 0.02lp/mm) at a comparable CNR in the middle of the phantom. The clear visualization of the aimed inhomogeneity at a diagnostic dose level demonstrates a resolution of 0.1 g/cm2 or 0.6% in terms of water-equivalent thickness. CONCLUSIONS We developed a dedicated method for helium ion radiography, based exclusively on pixelated semiconductor detectors. The achievement of a clinically desired image quality in simple phantoms at diagnostic dose levels was demonstrated experimentally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Martišíková
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T. Gehrke
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S. Berke
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Present address: The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP UK
| | - G. Aricò
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, Germany
- Present address: European Organization for Nuclear Research CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
| | - O. Jäkel
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|