Radiofrequency transmit calibration: A multi-center evaluation of vendor-provided radiofrequency transmit mapping methods

Bias, Repeatability and Reproducibility of Liver T1 Mapping With Variable Flip Angles

Background

Three‐dimensional variable flip angle (VFA) methods are commonly used for T₁ mapping of the liver, but there is no data on the accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of this technique in this organ in a multivendor setting.

Purpose

To measure bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T₁ mapping in the liver.

Study Type

Prospective observational.

Population

Eight healthy volunteers, four women, with no known liver disease.

Field Strength/Sequence

1.5‐T and 3.0‐T; three‐dimensional steady‐state spoiled gradient echo with VFAs; Look‐Locker.

Assessment

Traveling volunteers were scanned twice each (30 minutes to 3 months apart) on six MRI scanners from three vendors (GE Healthcare, Philips Medical Systems, and Siemens Healthineers) at two field strengths. The maximum period between the first and last scans among all volunteers was 9 months. Volunteers were instructed to abstain from alcohol intake for at least 72 hours prior to each scan and avoid high cholesterol foods on the day of the scan.

Statistical Tests

Repeated measures ANOVA, Student t‐test, Levene's test of variances, and 95% significance level. The percent error relative to literature liver T₁ in healthy volunteers was used to assess bias. The relative error (RE) due to intrascanner and interscanner variation in T₁ measurements was used to assess repeatability and reproducibility.

Results

The 95% confidence interval (CI) on the mean bias and mean repeatability RE of VFA T₁ in the healthy liver was 34 ± 6% and 10 ± 3%, respectively. The 95% CI on the mean reproducibility RE at 1.5 T and 3.0 T was 29 ± 7% and 25 ± 4%, respectively.

Data Conclusion

Bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T₁ mapping in the liver in a multivendor setting are similar to those reported for breast, prostate, and brain.

Level of Evidence

1

Technical Efficacy Stage

1

Fast B1 Mapping Based on Double-Angle Method with T1 Correction Using Standard Pulse Sequence

Radiofrequency (RF) field (B1) mapping by combining the double-angle method (DAM) and T1 correction was investigated. The signal intensities S1 and S2 acquired by flip angle (FA) α and double FA 2α at short repetition time (TR) were converted to a signal intensity at TR=∞ by T1 correction. Then, these were used for DAM calculation. The T1 values are measured from two different images acquired with different TRs based on the saturation recovery (SR) method preliminarily. The effects of imaging parameters for T1 estimation and measured FA were investigated using CuSO₄-doped water phantoms. A two-dimensional gradient echo type echo planar imaging pulse sequence was used. T1 values obtained by the 2-SR method were underestimated compared to the multipoint inversion recovery method. FA error was less than 5% when the appropriate imaging parameters were used. The acquisition time could be shortened to under 25 s by the use of T1-corrected DAM.

Effects of B1 + Heterogeneity on Spin Echo-Based Liver Iron Estimates

BACKGROUND

Liver iron concentration (LIC) measured by MRI has become the clinical reference standard for managing iron overload in chronically transfused patients. Transverse relaxivity (R₂ or R₂ ^* ) measurements are converted to LIC units using empirically derived calibration curves.

HYPOTHESIS

That flip angle (FA) error due to B₁ ⁺ spatial heterogeneity causes significant LIC quantitation error. B₁ ⁺ scale (b₁ , [FA_actual /FA_specified ]) variation is a major problem at 3 T which could reduce the accuracy of transverse relaxivity measurements.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Forty-seven subjects with chronic transfusional iron overload undergoing clinically indicated LIC assessment.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

5 T/3 T dual-repetition time B₁ ⁺ mapping sequence ASSESSMENT: We quantified the average/standard deviation b₁ in the right and left lobes of the liver from B₁ ⁺ maps acquired at 1.5 T and 3 T. The impact of b₁ variation on spin echo LIC estimates was determined using a Monte Carlo model.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Mean, median, and standard deviation in whole liver and right and left lobes; two-sided t-test between whole-liver b₁ means.

RESULTS

Average b₁ within the liver was 99.3% ± 12.3% at 1.5 T versus 69.6% ± 14.6% at 3 T and was independent of iron burden (P < 0.05). Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that b₁ systematically increased R₂ estimates at lower LIC (<~25 mg/g at 1.5 T, <~15 mg/g at 3 T) but flattened or even inverted the R₂ -LIC relationship at higher LIC (≥~25 mg/g to 1.5 T, ≥~15 mg/g to 3 T); changes in the R₂ -LIC relationship were symmetric with respect to over and under excitation and were similar at 1.5 T and 3 T (for the same R₂ value). The R₂ ^* -LIC relationship was independent of b₁ .

CONCLUSION

Spin echo R₂ measurement of LIC at 3 T is error-prone without correction for b₁ errors. The impact of b₁ error on current 1.5 T spin echo-based techniques for LIC quantification is large enough to introduce measurable intersubject variability but the in vivo effect size needs a dedicated validation study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE

2.

Multi-site, multi-platform comparison of MRI T1 measurement using the system phantom

Recent innovations in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement methods have led to improvements in accuracy, repeatability, and acquisition speed, and have prompted renewed interest to reevaluate the medical value of quantitative T₁. The purpose of this study was to determine the bias and reproducibility of T₁ measurements in a variety of MRI systems with an eye toward assessing the feasibility of applying diagnostic threshold T₁ measurement across multiple clinical sites. We used the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology (ISMRM/NIST) system phantom to assess variations of T₁ measurements, using a slow, reference standard inversion recovery sequence and a rapid, commonly-available variable flip angle sequence, across MRI systems at 1.5 tesla (T) (two vendors, with number of MRI systems n = 9) and 3 T (three vendors, n = 18). We compared the T₁ measurements from inversion recovery and variable flip angle scans to ISMRM/NIST phantom reference values using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to test for statistical differences between T₁ measurements grouped according to MRI scanner manufacturers and/or static field strengths. The inversion recovery method had minor over- and under-estimations compared to the NMR-measured T₁ values at both 1.5 T and 3 T. Variable flip angle measurements had substantially greater deviations from the NMR-measured T₁ values than the inversion recovery measurements. At 3 T, the measured variable flip angle T₁ for one vendor is significantly different than the other two vendors for most of the samples throughout the clinically relevant range of T₁. There was no consistent pattern of discrepancy between vendors. We suggest establishing rigorous quality control procedures for validating quantitative MRI methods to promote confidence and stability in associated measurement techniques and to enable translation of diagnostic threshold from the research center to the entire clinical community.

Quantitative MRI: Defining repeatability, reproducibility and accuracy for prostate cancer imaging biomarker development

INTRODUCTION

Quantitative MRI (qMRI) parameters have been increasingly used to develop predictive models to accurately monitor treatment response in prostate cancer after radiotherapy. To reliably detect changes in signal due to treatment response, predictive models require qMRI parameters with high repeatability and reproducibility. The purpose of this study was to measure qMRI parameter uncertainties in both commercial and in-house developed phantoms to guide the development of robust predictive models for monitoring treatment response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ADC, T1, and R2* values were acquired across three 3 T scanners with a prostate-specific qMRI protocol using the NIST/ISMRM system phantom, RSNA/NIST diffusion phantom, and an in-house phantom. A B1 field map was acquired to correct for flip angle inhomogeneity in T1 maps. All sequences were repeated in each scan to assess within-session repeatability. Weekly scans were acquired on one scanner for three months with the in-house phantom. Between-session repeatability was measured with test-retest scans 6-months apart on all scanners with all phantoms. Accuracy, defined as percentage deviation from reference value for ADC and T1, was evaluated using the system and diffusion phantoms. Repeatability and reproducibility coefficients of variation (%CV) were calculated for all qMRI parameters on all phantoms.

RESULTS

Overall, repeatability CV of ADC was <2.40%, reproducibility CV was <3.98%, and accuracy ranged between -8.0% to 2.7% across all scanners. Applying B1 correction on T1 measurements significantly improved the repeatability and reproducibility (p<0.05) but increased error in accuracy (p<0.001). Repeatability and reproducibility of R2* was <4.5% and <7.3% respectively in the system phantom across all scanners.

CONCLUSION

Repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy in qMRI parameters from a prostate-specific protocol was estimated using both commercial and in-house phantoms. Results from this work will be used to identify robust qMRI parameters for use in the development of predictive models to longitudinally monitor treatment response for prostate cancer in current and future clinical trials.