Small-field beam data acquisition, detector dependency, and film-based validation for a novel self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system

Experimental and Monte Carlo based dosimetric investigation of a novel 3 mm radiosurgery 3 MV beam using the microSilicon detector

BACKGROUND

The ZAP-X system is a novel gyroscopic radiosurgical system based on a 3 MV linear accelerator and collimator cones with a diameter between 4 and 25 mm. Advances in imaging modalities to detect small and early-stage pathologies allow for an early and less invasive treatment, where a smaller collimator matching the anatomical target could provide better sparing of surrounding healthy tissue.

PURPOSE

A novel 3 mm collimator cone for the ZAP-X was developed. This study aims to investigate the usability of a commercial diode detector (microSilicon) for the dosimetric characterization of this small collimator cone; and to investigate the underlying small field perturbation effects.

METHODS

Profile measurements in five depths as well as PDD and output ratio measurements were performed with a microSilicon detector and radiochromic EBT3 films. In addition, comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations were performed to validate the measurement observations and to quantify the perturbation effects of the microSilicon detector in these extremely small field conditions.

RESULTS

It is shown that the microSilicon detector enables an accurate dosimetric characterization of the 3 mm beam. The profile parameters, such as the FWHM and 20%-80% penumbra width, agree within 0.1 to 0.2 mm between film and detector measurements. The output ratios agree within the measurement uncertainty between microSilicon detector and films, whereas the comparisons of the PDD results show good agreement with the Monte Carlo simulations. The analysis of the perturbation factors of the microSilicon detector reveals a small field correction factor of approximately 3% for the 3 mm circular beam and a correction factor smaller than 1.5% for field diameters above 3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

It could be shown that the microSilicon detector is well-suitable for the characterization of the new 3 mm circular beam of the ZAP-X system.

Accurate machine-specific reference and small-field dosimetry for a self-shielded neuro-radiosurgical system

BACKGROUND

The newly available ZAP-X stereotactic radiosurgical system is designed for the treatment of intracranial lesions, with several unique features that include a self-shielding, gyroscopic gantry, wheel collimation, non-orthogonal kV imaging, short source-axis distance, and low-energy megavoltage beam. Systematic characterization of its radiation as well as other properties is imperative to ensure its safe and effective clinical application.

PURPOSE

To accurately determine the radiation output of the ZAP-X with a special focus on the smaller diameter cones and an aim to provide useful recommendations on quantification of small field dosimetry.

METHODS

Six different types of detectors were used to measure relative output factors at field sizes ranging from 4 to 25 mm, including the PTW microSilicon and microdiamond diodes, Exradin W2 plastic scintillator, Exradin A16 and A1SL ionization chambers, and the alanine dosimeter. The 25 mm cone served as the reference field size. Absolute dose was determined with both TG-51-based dosimetry using a calibrated PTW Semiflex ion chamber and measurements using alanine dosimeters.

RESULTS

The average radiation output factors (maximum deviation from the average) measured with the microDiamond, microSilicon, and W2 detectors were: for the 4 mm cone, 0.741 (1.0%); for the 5 mm cone: 0.817 (1.0%); for the 7.5 mm cone: 0.908 (1.0%); for the 10 mm cone: 0.946 (0.4%); for the 12.5 mm cone: 0.964 (0.2%); for the 15 mm cone: 0.976 (0.1%); for the 20 mm cone: 0.990 (0.1%). For field sizes larger than 10 mm, the A1SL and A16 micro-chambers also yielded consistent output factors within 1.5% of those obtained using the microSilicon, microdiamond, and W2 detectors. The absolute dose measurement obtained with alanine was within 1.2%, consistent with combined uncertainties, compared to the PTW Semiflex chamber for the 25 mm reference cone.

CONCLUSION

For field sizes less than 10 mm, the microSilicon diode, microDiamond detector, and W2 scintillator are suitable devices for accurate small field dosimetry of the ZAP-X system. For larger fields, the A1SL and A16 micro-chambers can also be used. Furthermore, alanine dosimetry can be an accurate verification of reference and absolute dose typically measured with ion chambers. Use of multiple suitable detectors and uncertainty analyses were recommended for reliable determination of small field radiation outputs.

Machine performance and stability of the first clinical self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system: Initial 2-year experience

This study provides insight into the overall system performance, stability, and delivery accuracy of the first clinical self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system. Quality assurance procedures specifically developed for this unit are discussed, and trends and variations over the course of 2-years for beam constancy, targeting and dose delivery are presented. Absolute dose calibration for this 2.7 MV unit is performed to deliver 1 cGy/MU at d_max  = 7 mm at a source-to-axis-distance (SAD) of 450 mm for a 25 mm collimator. Output measurements were made with 2-setups: a device that attaches to a fixed position on the couch (daily) and a spherical phantom that attaches to the collimating wheel (monthly). Beam energy was measured using a cylindrical acrylic phantom at depths of 100 (D₁₀ ) and 200 (D₂₀ ) mm. Beam profiles were evaluated using Gafchromic film and compared with TPS beam data. Accuracy in beam targeting was quantified with the Winston-Lutz (WL) and end-to-end (E2E) tests. Delivery quality assurance (DQA) was performed prior to clinical treatments using Gafchromic EBT3/XD film. Net cumulative output adjustments of 15% (pre-clinical), 9% (1st year) and 3% (2nd year) were made. The mean output was 0.997 ± 0.010 cGy/MU (range: 0.960-1.046 cGy/MU) and 0.993 ± 0.029 cGy/MU (range: 0.884-1.065 cGy/MU) for measurements with the daily and monthly setups, respectively. The mean relative beam energy (D₁₀ /D₂₀ ) was 0.998 ± 0.004 (range: 0.991-1.006). The mean total targeting error was 0.46 ± 0.17 mm (range: 0.06-0.98 mm) for the WL and 0.52 ± 0.28 mm (range: 0.11-1.27 mm) for the E2E tests. The average gamma pass rates for DQA measurements were 99.0% and 90.5% for 2%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm gamma criteria, respectively. This SRS unit meets tolerance limits recommended by TG-135, MPPG 9a., and TG-142 with a treatment delivery accuracy similar to what is achieved by other SRS systems.

Technical note: Absolute dose measurements of a vault-free radiosurgery system

BACKGROUND

Methods for accurate absolute dose (AD) calibration are essential for the proper functioning of radiotherapy treatment machines. Many systems do not conform to TG-51 calibration standards, and modifications are required. TG-21 calibration is also a viable methodology for these situations with the appropriate setup, equipment, and factors. It has been shown that both these methods result in minimal errors. A similar approach has been taken in calibrating the dose for a recent vault-free radiosurgery system.

PURPOSE

To evaluate modified TG-21 and TG-51 protocols for AD calibrations of the ZAP-X radiosurgery system using ion chambers, film, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).

METHODS

The current treatment planning system for ZAP-X requires AD calibration at d_max (7 mm) and 450 mm source-to-axis distance. Both N D , w 60 C o [ G y / C ] $N_{D,w}^{{60}Co}[ {Gy/C} ]$ and N_x [R/C] calibration coefficients were provided by an accredited dosimetry calibration laboratory for a physikalisch technische werkstatten (PTW) 31010 chamber (0.125 cc). The vendor provides an f-bracket that can be mounted on the collimator. Various phantoms can then be attached to the f-bracket. A custom acrylic phantom was designed based on recommendations from TG-21 and technical report series-398 that places the chamber at 500 mm from the source with a depth of 44-mm acrylic and 456-mm SSD. N_x along with other TG-21 parameters was used to calculate the AD. Measurements using a PTW MP3-XS water tank and the same chamber were used to calculate AD using N D , w 60 C o $N_{D,w}^{{60}Co}$ and TG-51 factors. Dose verification was performed using Gafchromic film and 3rd party TLDs.

RESULTS

Measurements from TG-51, TG-21 (utilizing the custom acrylic phantom), film, and TLDs agreed to within ± 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified TG-51 AD calculation in water is preferred but may not be practical due to the difficulty in tank setup. The TG-21 modified protocol using a custom acrylic phantom is an accurate alternative option for dose calibration. Both of these methods are within acceptable agreement and provide confidence in the system's AD calibration.

Self-Shielding Gyroscopic Radiosurgery - A First Clinical Experience, Case Series, and Dosimetric Comparison

BACKGROUND

Self-shielding gyroscopic radiosurgery (GRS) represents a technical innovation in the field of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). GRS does not require a radiation vault and is optimized for radiosurgical treatments. Reports on its usage are limited. We describe the first clinical experience of GRS at our institution to assess the application of GRS in the treatment of cranial tumors. Moreover, we perform a dosimetric comparison to robotic radiosurgery (RRS) with vestibular schwannoma (VS) GRS patients.

METHODS

Patients who were treated with GRS between July and November 2021 were included. Patient, tumor, and dosimetric characteristics were retrospectively summarized and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with 48 intracranial tumors were included. Tumor entities mostly comprised VS, brain metastases, and meningiomas. The median prescription dose and isodose line were 13.5 Gy and 50.0% for benign neoplasia vs. 20 Gy and 60.0% for malignant tumors, respectively. The mean planning target volume was 1.5 cubic centimeters. All patients received a single-fraction treatment without encountering any technical setup difficulties. Treatment plan comparisons with RRS revealed comparable plan characteristics, dose gradients, and organs at risk doses. Significant differences were detected concerning the new conformity index and number of monitor units per treatment (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This case series provides more evidence on the usage of self-shielding GRS in the management of cranial tumors. Dosimetric comparisons for VS cases revealed mostly equivalent dosimetric characteristics to RRS. Further clinical and physical analyses for GRS are on their way.