1
|
Kazantsev P, Wesolowska P, Bokulic T, Falowska-Pietrzak O, Repnin K, Dimitriadis A, Swamidas J, Izewska J. The IAEA remote audit of small field dosimetry for testing the implementation of the TRS-483 code of practice. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38700987 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The TRS‑483, an IAEA/AAPM International Code of Practice on dosimetry of small static photon fields, underwent testing via an IAEA coordinated research project (CRP). Alongside small field output factors (OFs) measurements using active dosimeters by CRP participants, the IAEA Dosimetry Laboratory received a mandate to formulate a remote small field dosimetry audit method using its passive dosimetry systems. PURPOSE This work aimed to develop a small field dosimetry audit methodology employing radiophotoluminescent dosimeters (RPLDs) and radiochromic films. The methodology was subsequently evaluated through a multicenter pilot study with CRP participants. METHODS The developments included designing and manufacturing a dosimeter holder set and the characterization of an RPLD system for measurements in small photon fields using the new holder. The audit included verification of small field OFs and lateral beam profiles for small fields. At first, treatment planning system (TPS) calculated OFs were checked against a reference data set that was available for conventional linacs. Second, calculated OFs were verified through the RPLD measurement of point doses in a machine-specific reference field, 4 cm × 4 cm, 2 cm × 2 cm, and 1 cm × 1 cm, corresponding size circular fields or nearest achievable field sizes. Lastly, profile checks in in-plane and cross-plane directions were done for the two smallest fields by comparing film measurements with TPS calculations at 20%, 50%, and 80% isodose levels. RESULTS RPLD correction factors for small field measurements were approximately unity. However, they influenced the dose determination's overall uncertainty in small fields, estimated at 2.30% (k = 1 level). Considering the previous experience in auditing reference beam output following the TRS-398 Code of Practice, the acceptance limit of 5% for the ratio of the dose determined by RPLD to the dose calculated by TPS, DRPLD/DTPS, was considered adequate. The multicenter pilot study included 15 participants from 14 countries (39 beams). Consistent with the previous findings, the results of the OF check against the reference data confirmed that TPSs tend to overestimate OFs for the smallest fields included in this exercise. All except three RPLD measurement results were within the acceptance limit, and the spread of results increased for smaller field sizes. The differences between the film measured and TPS calculated dose profiles were within 3 mm for most of the beams checked; deviated results revealed problems with TPS commissioning and calibration of the treatment unit collimation systems. CONCLUSION The newly developed small field dosimetry audit methodology proved effective and successfully complemented the CRP OF measurements by participants with RPLD audit results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paulina Wesolowska
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
- The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomislav Bokulic
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
- University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Olga Falowska-Pietrzak
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
- Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kostiantyn Repnin
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ocampo J, Heyes G, Dehghani H, Scanlon T, Jolly S, Gibson A. Determination of output factor for CyberKnife using scintillation dosimetry and deep learning. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:025024. [PMID: 38181420 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad1b69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Objective. Small-field dosimetry is an ongoing challenge in radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) especially for radiosurgery systems such as CyberKnifeTM. The objective of this work is to demonstrate the use of a plastic scintillator imaged with a commercial camera to measure the output factor of a CyberKnife system. The output factor describes the dose on the central axis as a function of collimator size, and is a fundamental part of CyberKnife QA and integral to the data used in the treatment planning system.Approach. A self-contained device consisting of a solid plastic scintillator and a camera was build in a portable Pelicase. Photographs were analysed using classical methods and with convolutional neural networks (CNN) to predict beam parameters which were then compared to measurements.Main results. Initial results using classical image processing to determine standard QA parameters such as percentage depth dose (PDD) were unsuccessful, with 34% of points failing to meet the Gamma criterion (which measures the distance between corresponding points and the relative difference in dose) of 2 mm/2%. However, when images were processed using a CNN trained on simulated data and a green scintillator sheet, 92% of PDD curves agreed with measurements with a microdiamond detector to within 2 mm/2% and 78% to 1%/1 mm. The mean difference between the output factors measured using this system and a microdiamond detector was 1.1%. Confidence in the results was enhanced by using the algorithm to predict the known collimator sizes from the photographs which it was able to do with an accuracy of less than 1 mm.Significance. With refinement, a full output factor curve could be measured in less than an hour, offering a new approach for rapid, convenient small-field dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Ocampo
- UCL Physics and Astronomy, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Geoff Heyes
- Radiotherapy Physics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Hamid Dehghani
- School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Scanlon
- UCL Physics and Astronomy, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Jolly
- UCL Physics and Astronomy, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Gibson
- UCL Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Das IJ, Sohn JJ, Lim SN, Sengupta B, Feijoo M, Yadav P. Characteristics of a plastic scintillation detector in photon beam dosimetry. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14209. [PMID: 37983685 PMCID: PMC10795454 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plastic scintillating detectors (PSD) have gained popularity due to small size and are ideally suited in small-field dosimetry due to no correction needed and hence detector reading can be compared to dose. Likewise, these detectors are active and water equivalent. A new PSD from Blue Physics is characterized in photon beam. PURPOSE Innovation in small-field dosimetry detector has led us to examine Blue Physics PSD (BP-PSD) for use in photon beams from linear accelerator. METHODS BP-PSD was acquired and its characteristics were evaluated in photon beams from a Varian TrueBeam. Data were collected in a 3D water tank. Standard parameters; dose, dose rate, energy, angular dependence and temperature dependence were studied. Depth dose, profiles and output in a reference condition as well as small fields were measured. RESULTS BP-PSD is versatile and provides data very similar to an ion chamber when Cerenkov radiation is properly accounted. This device measures data pulse by pulse which very few detectors can perform. The differences between ion chamber data and PSD are < 2% in most cases. The angular dependence is a bit pronounces to 1.5% which is due to PSD housing. Depth dose and profiles are comparable within < 1% to an ion chamber. For small fields this detector provides suitable field output factor compared to other detectors and Monte Carlo (MC) simulated data without any added correction factor. CONCLUSIONS The characteristics of Blue Physics PSD is uniquely suitable in photon beam and more so in small fields. The data are reproducible compared to ion chamber for most parameters and ideally suitable for small-field dosimetry without any correction factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra J. Das
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Jooyoung J. Sohn
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Sara N. Lim
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Bishwambhar Sengupta
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Poonam Yadav
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mateus D, Greco C, Peralta L. Field output correction factors of small static field for IBA razor nanochamber. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023; 10:015004. [PMID: 37939486 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad0ae0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Purpose.The goal of this work is present results of field output factors (OF) using an IBA CC003 (Razor NanoChamber) and compare these results with PTW 60019 (MicroDiamond) and IBA Razor Diode. The experimental results for IBA CC003 were also compared with Monte Carlo (MC) Simulation, using Penelope and Ulysses programs. In addition, field output correction factors (kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr) for IBA CC003 were derived with three different methods: (1) using PTW 60019 and IBA Razor as reference detectors; (2) comparison between MC and experimental measurements; and (3) using only MC.Material and Methods. The beam collimation included in this study were (1) square field size between 10 × 10 and 0.5 × 0.5 cm2defined by the MLC and jaws and (2) cones of different diameters. For IBA CC003 it was determined the polarity and ion collection efficiency correction factors in parallel and perpendicular orientation.Results.The results indicate (1) the variation of polarity effect with the field size is relevant for the determination of OF using IBA CC003, especially for parallel orientation; (2) there is no significant variation of the ion collection efficiency with the field size using IBA CC003 in parallel orientation; (3) OF differences between IBA CC003 and PTW 60019/IBA Razor, and experimental and MC results, increase with decreasing field size;ThekQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrresults indicate (1) using the first and second method,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrincrease with decreasing field size, which can be related with the influence of the volume effect and (2) using the third method,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrdecrease with decreasing field size, which can be explained by the perturbation effect.Conclusions. Our results demonstrate the need of applyingkQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrfor IBA CC003 forSclin≤1 cm, to compensate for volume averaging and perturbations effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Mateus
- Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Mercurius Health S.A, Lisboa, Portugal
- Fundação Champalimaud, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - C Greco
- Fundação Champalimaud, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - L Peralta
- Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Šegedin N, Hršak H, Babić SD, Jurković S. Determination of volume averaging correction factors using an elliptical absorbed dose model for Gamma Knife Perfexion. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14109. [PMID: 37632162 PMCID: PMC10562043 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to calculate volume averaging correction factors for detectors used in the dosimetry of Gamma Knife's narrow photon beams, and to determine the impact of volume averaging on the field output correction factor. METHODS Simulations of different Gamma Knife fields were done using elliptical dose model formalism with newly introduced fit functions. To determine volume averaging correction factors a calculation of the absorbed dose over the volume of the detector was performed. The elliptical dose model was tested with respect to absorbed dose distribution for different volumes and compared with the calculations of Leksell GammaPlan v.11.3.1. RESULTS The largest differences in absorbed dose calculated by the elliptical model and Leksell GammaPlan are 2.25%, 1.5%, and 0.6% for 16, 8, and 4 mm field sizes, respectively. Volume averaging correction factors were determined for six ionization chambers, five semiconductor detectors, a diamond, and two plastic scintillator detectors. In general, for all examined detectors the impact of volume averaging is more pronounced for smaller field sizes. All studied ionization chambers had a larger volume than other detectors, therefore the volume averaging correction factors for ionization chambers are larger for all investigated field sizes. Besides the fact that plastic scintillator detectors can be considered tissue-equivalent, volume averaging correction factor should be applied. CONCLUSION Volume averaging correction factors for different detectors are determined and suitable detectors for dosimetry of Gamma Knife's narrow photon beams are recommended. It is shown that volume averaging has a dominant contribution to a field output correction factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikola Šegedin
- Department for Physics and BiophysicsSchool of MedicineUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
| | - Hrvoje Hršak
- Department for Medical PhysicsUniversity Hospital Centre ZagrebZagrebCroatia
| | - Sanja Dolanski Babić
- Department for Physics and BiophysicsSchool of MedicineUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
| | - Slaven Jurković
- Department for Medical Physics and BiophysicsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of RijekaRijekaCroatia
- Department for Medical Physics and Radiation ProtectionUniversity Hospital Centre RijekaRijekaCroatia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Timakova E, Bazalova-Carter M, Zavgorodni S. Characterization of a 0.8 mm 3Medscint plastic scintillator detector system for small field dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:175040. [PMID: 37494941 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aceacf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Plastic scintillator detectors (PSDs) have demonstrated ability to meet requirements of small field dosimetry. Medscint developed a 1 mm long, 1 mm diameter cylindrical PSD with effective volume of 0.8 mm3. Clinically relevant, small field dosimetric properties of this detector, combined with a novel scintillation dosimetry system-HYPERSCINT RP-200, and HYPERDOSE analysis software were evaluated in this study.Approach. This novel scintillator-based dosimetry system was characterized with 6 MV-WFF and 10 MV-FFF x-ray beams delivered by Varian TrueBeamTMlinear accelerator. The detector was characterized for leakage, short-term repeatability, dose response linearity, angular response, dose rate response, and field size dependence for radiation field sizes of 0.25 × 0.25 to 10 × 10 cm2. Measured detector specific output ratios were compared with microDiamond output factors to determine small field output correction factors,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr.Main results. The dosimetry system showed excellent short-term repeatability with standard deviation of only 0.04 ± 0.01%. It demonstrated good dose linearity with variations less than 1.0% for 14.4 cGy and above. The dosimetry system was found to be independent of dose rate and angle of irradiation, with deviations for both below 0.5%. Leakage was found to be comparable to background readings. For 6 MV-WFF energy beams, detector specific output ratios for field sizes down to 1 × 1 cm2agreed with output factors measured with PTW TN60019 microDiamond, thus,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrequates to unity for these field sizes. For 10 MV-FFF energy beams, detector specific output ratios for field sizes down to 2 × 2 cm2agreed with PTW TN60019 microDiamond output factors, thus,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrequates to unity for these field sizes.kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrfor field sizes down to 0.5 × 0.5 cm2were determined to be within 6% of unity for both 6 MV-WFF and 10 MV-FFF energy beams.Significance. The HYPERSCINT RP-200 dosimetry system coupled with a 0.8 mm3PSD showed excellent dosimetric properties and was found to be clinically relevant for relative dosimetry down to field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2and potentially smaller.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Timakova
- University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Sergei Zavgorodni
- University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kretschmer J, Brodbek L, Behrends C, Kugel F, Koska B, Bäumer C, Wulff J, Timmermann B, Poppe B, Looe HK. Comprehensive investigation of lateral dose profile and output factor measurements in small proton fields from different delivery techniques. Med Phys 2023. [PMID: 36908165 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE As part of the commissioning and quality assurance in proton beam therapy, lateral dose profiles and output factors have to be acquired. Such measurements can be performed with point detectors and are especially challenging in small fields or steep lateral penumbra regions as the detector's volume effect may lead to perturbations. To address this issue, this work aims to quantify and correct for such perturbations of six point detectors in small proton fields created via three different delivery techniques. METHODS Lateral dose profile and output measurements of three proton beam delivery techniques (pencil beam scanning, pencil beam scanning combined with collimators, passive scattering with collimators) were performed using high-resolution EBT3 films, a PinPoint 3D 31022 ionization chamber, a microSilicon diode 60023 and a microDiamond detector 60019 (all PTW Freiburg, Germany). Detector specific lateral dose response functions K(x,y) acting as the convolution kernel transforming the undisturbed dose distribution D(x,y) into the measured signal profiles M(x,y) were applied to quantify perturbations of the six investigated detectors in the proton fields and correct the measurements. A signal theoretical analysis in Fourier space of the dose distributions and detector's K(x,y) was performed to aid the understanding of the measurement process with regard to the combination of detector choice and delivery technique. RESULTS Quantification of the lateral penumbra broadening and signal reduction at the fields center revealed that measurements in the pencil beam scanning fields are only compromised slightly even by large volume ionization chambers with maximum differences in the lateral penumbra of 0.25 mm and 4% signal reduction at the field center. In contrast, radiation techniques with collimation are not accurately represented by the investigated detectors as indicated by a penumbra broadening up to 1.6 mm for passive scattering with collimators and 2.2 mm for pencil beam scanning with collimators. For a 3 mm diameter collimator field, a signal reduction at field center between 7.6% and 60.7% was asserted. Lateral dose profile measurements have been corrected via deconvolution with the corresponding K(x,y) to obtain the undisturbed D(x,y). Corrected output ratios of the passively scattered collimated fields obtained for the microDiamond, microSilicon and PinPoint 3D show agreement better than 0.9% (one standard deviation) for the smallest field size of 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS Point detector perturbations in small proton fields created with three delivery techniques were quantified and found to be especially pronounced for collimated small proton fields with steep dose gradients. Among all investigated detectors, the microSilicon diode showed the smallest perturbations. The correction strategies based on detector's K(x,y) were found suitable for obtaining unperturbed lateral dose profiles and output factors. Approximation of K(x,y) by considering only the geometrical averaging effect has been shown to provide reasonable prediction of the detector's volume effect. The findings of this work may be used to guide the choice of point detectors in various proton fields and to contribute towards the development of a code of practice for small field proton dosimetry. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kretschmer
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - L Brodbek
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.,EBG MedAustron GmbH, Marie Curie-Straße 5, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - C Behrends
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - F Kugel
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,Department of Physics, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - B Koska
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - C Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - B Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - B Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany
| | - H K Looe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choi Y, Chun KJ, Kim ES, Bahng J, Yang HJ, Kim TH, Cho GS, Choi SH, Seo YC, Chung HT. Consistency of dose rates after applying machine-specific reference correction factors for the gamma knife 16 mm collimator field. Med Phys 2023. [PMID: 36700450 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The machine-specific reference (msr) correction factors ( k Q msr , Q 0 f msr , f ref $k_{{Q_{{\rm{msr}}}},\;{Q_0}}^{{f_{{\rm{msr}}}},{f_{{\rm{ref}}}}}$ ) were introduced in International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series 483 (TRS-483) for reference dosimetry of small fields. Several correction factor sets exist for a Leksell Gamma Knife (GK) Perfexion or Icon. Nevertheless, experiments have not rigorously validated the correction factors from different studies. PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the role and accuracy of k Q msr , Q 0 f msr , f ref $k_{{Q_{{\rm{msr}}}},\;{Q_0}}^{{f_{{\rm{msr}}}},{f_{{\rm{ref}}}}}$ values in determining the absorbed dose rates to water in the reference dosimetry of Gamma Knife. METHODS The dose rates in the 16 mm collimator field of a GK were determined following the international code of practices with three ionization chambers: PTW T31010, PTW T31016 (PTW Freiberg GmbH, New York, NY), and Exradin A16 (Standard Imaging, Inc., Middleton, WI). A chamber was placed at the center of a solid water phantom (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) using a detector-specific insert. The reference point of the ionization chamber was confirmed using cone-beam CT images. Consistency checks were repeated five times at a GK site and performed once at seven GK sites. Correction factors from six simulations reported in previous studies were employed. Variations in the dose rates and relative dose rates before and after applying the k Q m s r , Q 0 f m s r , f r e f $k_{{Q_{msr}},\;{Q_0}}^{{f_{msr}},{f_{ref}}}$ were statistically compared. RESULTS The standard deviation of the dose rates measured by the three chambers decreased significantly after any correction method was applied (p = 0.000). When the correction factors of all studies were averaged, the standard deviation was reduced significantly more than when any single correction method was applied (p ≤ 0.030), except for the IAEA TRS-483 correction factors (p = 0.148). Before any correction was applied, there were statistically significant differences among the relative dose rates measured by the three chambers (p = 0.000). None of the single correction methods could remove the differences among the ionization chambers (p ≤ 0.038). After TRS-483 correction, the dose rate of Exradin A16 differed from those of the other two chambers (p ≤ 0.025). After the averaged factors were applied, there were no statistically significant differences between any pairs of chambers according to Scheffe's post hoc analyses (p ≥ 0.051); however, PTW T31010 differed from PTW 31016 according to Tukey's HSD analyses (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION The k Q msr , Q 0 f msr , f ref $k_{{Q_{{\rm{msr}}}},\;{Q_0}}^{{f_{{\rm{msr}}}},{f_{{\rm{ref}}}}}$ significantly reduced variations in the dose rates measured by the three ionization chambers. The mean correction factors of the six simulations produced the most consistent results, but this finding was not explicitly proven in the statistical analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yona Choi
- Department of Accelerator Science, Korea University Sejong Campus, Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Kook Jin Chun
- Department of Accelerator Science, Korea University Sejong Campus, Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun San Kim
- Department of Accelerator Science, Korea University Sejong Campus, Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Jungbae Bahng
- Department of Accelerator Science, Korea University Sejong Campus, Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Jeong Yang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Kim
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University College of Engineering, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyu Seok Cho
- Research Team of Radiological Physics & Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hyoun Choi
- Research Team of Radiological Physics & Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Chan Seo
- Department of Medical Device Development, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Tai Chung
- Department of Medical Device Development, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Neupane T, Galanakou P, Shang C, Leventouri T, Kasper M, Muhammad W. A novel Monte Carlo (MC) dose model for small MLC fields of the cyberknife ® M6 TM radiosurgery system using the EGSnrc. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13880. [PMID: 36651219 PMCID: PMC10113689 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The multi-leaf collimator (MLC)-equipped CyberKnife® M6 radiosurgery system (CKM6) (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) has been increasingly employed for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to treat relatively small lesions. However, achieving an accurate dose distribution in such cases is usually challenging due to the combination of numerous small fields ≤ (30 × 30) mm2 . In this study, we developed a new Monte Carlo (MC) dose model for the CKM6 system using the EGSnrc to investigate dose variations in the small fields. The dose model was verified for the static MLC fields ranging from (53.8 × 53.9) to (7.6 × 7.7) mm2 at 800 mm source to axis distance in a water phantom, based on the computed doses of Accuray Precision® (Accuray Inc.) treatment planning system (TPS). We achieved a statistical uncertainty of ≤4% by simulating 30-50 million incident particles/histories. Then, the treatment plans were created for the same fields in the TPS, and the corresponding measurements were performed with MapCHECK2 (Sun Nuclear Corporation), a standard device for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA). Results of the MC simulations, TPS, and MapCHECK2 measurements were inter-compared. An overall difference in dosimetric parameters such as profiles, tissue maximum ratio (TMR), and output factors (OF) between the MC simulations and the TPS results was found ≤3% for (53.8 × 53.9-15.4 × 15.4) mm2 MLC fields, and it rose to 4.5% for the smallest (7.6 mm × 7.7 mm) MLC field. The MapCHECK2 results showed a deviation ranging from -1.5% to + 4.5% compared to the TPS results, whereas the deviation was within ±2.5% compared with the MC results. Overall, our MC dose model for the CKM6 system showed better agreement with measurements and it could serve as a secondary dose verification tool for the patient-specific QA in small fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taindra Neupane
- Department of Physics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - Panagiota Galanakou
- Department of Physics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - Charles Shang
- Department of Physics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.,South Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Delray Beach, Florida, USA
| | - Theodora Leventouri
- Department of Physics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Kasper
- Lynn Cancer Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Baptist Health South, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - Wazir Muhammad
- Department of Physics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jacqmin DJ, Miller JR, Barraclough BA, Labby ZE. Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13728. [PMID: 35861648 PMCID: PMC9359019 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this work is to evaluate the Standard Imaging Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector (W2) for use in the types of fields used for stereotactic radiosurgery. Methods Prior to testing the W2 in small fields, the W2 was evaluated in standard large field conditions to ensure good detector performance. These tests included energy dependence, short‐term repeatability, dose‐response linearity, angular dependence, temperature dependence, and dose rate dependence. Next, scan settings and calibration of the W2 were optimized to ensure high quality data acquisition. Profiles of small fields shaped by cones and multi‐leaf collimator (MLCs) were measured using the W2 and IBA RAZOR diode in a scanning water tank. Output factors for cones (4–17.5 mm) and MLC fields (1, 2, 3 cm) were acquired with both detectors. Finally, the dose at isocenter for seven radiosurgery plans was measured with the W2 detector. Results W2 exhibited acceptable warm‐up behavior, short‐term reproducibility, axial angular dependence, dose‐rate linearity, and dose linearity. The detector exhibits a dependence upon energy, polar angle, and temperature. Scanning measurements taken with the W2 and RAZOR were in good agreement, with full‐width half‐maximum and penumbra widths agreeing to within 0.1 mm. The output factors measured by the W2 and RAZOR exhibited a maximum difference of 1.8%. For the seven point‐dose measurements of radiosurgery plans, the W2 agreed well with our treatment planning system with a maximum deviation of 2.2%. The Čerenkov light ratio calibration method did not significantly impact the measurement of relative profiles, output factors, or point dose measurements. Conclusion The W2 demonstrated dosimetric characteristics that are suitable for radiosurgery field measurements. The detector agreed well with the RAZOR diode for output factors and scanned profiles and showed good agreement with the treatment planning system in measurements of clinical treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin J Jacqmin
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jessica R Miller
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Brendan A Barraclough
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zacariah E Labby
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lechner W, Alfonso R, Arib M, Huq MS, Ismail A, Kinhikar R, Lárraga-Gutiérrez JM, Mani KR, Maphumulo N, Sauer OA, Shoeir S, Suriyapee S, Christaki K. A multi-institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS-483. Med Phys 2022; 49:5537-5550. [PMID: 35717637 PMCID: PMC9541513 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). Materials and methods Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with various detectors. Various linac models using the beam qualities 6 MV and 10 MV with flattening filter and without flattening filter were utilized to generate square fields down to a nominal field size of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. The detectors were positioned at 10 cm depth in water. Depending on the local situation, the source‐to‐surface distance was either set to 90 cm or 100 cm. The SFOFs were normalized to the output of the 10 cm × 10 cm field. The spread of SFOFs measured with different detectors was investigated for each individual linac beam quality and field size. Additionally, linac‐type specific SFOF curves were determined for each beam quality and the SFOFs determined using individual detectors were compared to these curves. Example uncertainty budgets were established for a solid state detector and a micro ionization chamber. Results The spread of SFOFs for each linac and field was below 5% for all field sizes. With the exception of one linac‐type, the SFOFs of all investigated detectors agreed within 10% with the respective linac‐type SFOF curve, indicating a potential inter‐detector and inter‐linac variability. Conclusion Quality assurance on the SFOF measurements can be done by investigation of the spread of SFOFs measured with multiple detectors and by comparison to linac‐type specific SFOFs. A follow‐up of a measurement session should be conducted if the spread of SFOFs is larger than 5%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 2 cm × 2 cm, respectively. Additionally, deviations of measured SFOFs to the linac‐type‐curves of more than 7%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 1 cm × 1 cm, respectively, should be followed up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Lechner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Rodolfo Alfonso
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, Higher Institute of Technology and Applied Sciences, University of Havana, Havana, 10400, Cuba
| | - Mehenna Arib
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anas Ismail
- Protection and Safety Department, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, Damascus, PO Box 6091, Syria
| | - Rajesh Kinhikar
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India 400012 & Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400094, India
| | - José M Lárraga-Gutiérrez
- Laboratorio de Física-Médica, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan 14269, CDMX, México
| | - Karthick Raj Mani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, United Hospital Ltd., Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Nkosingiphile Maphumulo
- Radiation Dosimetry Section, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Sivalee Suriyapee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rudek B, Bernstein K, Osterman S, Qu T. Replacing gamma knife beam-profiles on film with point-detector scans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13522. [PMID: 35001499 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Detector arrays and profile-scans have widely replaced film-measurements for quality assurance (QA) on linear accelerators. Film is still used for relative output factor (ROF) measurements, positioning, and dose-profile verification for annual Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) QA. This study shows that small-field active detector measurements can be performed in the easily accessed clinical mode and that they are an effective replacement to time-consuming and exacting film measurements. METHODS Beam profiles and positioning scans for 4-mm, 8-mm, and 16-mm-collimated fields were collected along the x-, y-, and z-axes. The Exradin W2-scintillator and the PTW microdiamond-detector were placed in custom inserts centered in the Elekta solid-water phantom for these scans. GafChromic EBT3-film was irradiated with single uniformly collimated exposures as the clinical-standard reference, using the same solid-water phantom for profile tests and the Elekta film holder for radiation focal point (RFP)/patient-positioning system (PPS) coincidence. All experimental data were compared to the tissue-maximum-ratio-based (TMR10) dose calculation. RESULTS The detector-measured beam profiles and film-based profiles showed excellent agreement with TMR10-predicted full-width, half-maximum (FWHM) values. Absolute differences between the measured FWHM and FWHM from the treatment-planning system were on average 0.13 mm, 0.08 mm, and 0.04 mm for film, microdiamond, and scintillator, respectively. The coincidence between the RFP and the PPS was measured to be ≤0.5 mm with microdiamond, ≤0.41 mm with the W2-1 × 1 scintillator, and ≤0.22 mm using the film-technique. CONCLUSIONS Small-volume field detectors, used in conjunction with a clinically available phantom, an electrometer with data-logging, and treatment plans created in clinical mode offer an efficient and viable alternative for film-based profile tests. Position verification can be accurately performed when CBCT-imaging is available to correct for residual detector-position uncertainty. Scans are easily set up within the treatment-planning-system and, when coupled with an automated analysis, can provide accurate measurements within minutes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Rudek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sunshine Osterman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tanxia Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hupman MA, Hill IG, Syme A. Measuring small field profiles and output factors with a stemless plastic scintillator array. Med Phys 2021; 49:624-631. [PMID: 34792193 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To fabricate a 1D stemless plastic scintillation detector (SPSD) array using organic photodiodes and to use the detector to measure small field profiles and output factors. METHODS An organic photodiode array was fabricated by spin coating a mixture of P3HT and PCBM organic semiconductors onto an ITO-coated glass substrate and depositing aluminum top contacts. Four bulk scintillators of various dimensions were placed on top of the photodiode array. A fifth scintillator was used that had been segmented by laser etching and the septa filled with black paint. Each detector array was first calibrated using a reference field of 95 cm SSD, 5 cm depth, and 10 × 10 cm2 field size for a 6 MV photon beam. After calibration, profiles were measured for three small field sizes: 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 , 1 × 1 cm2 , and 2 × 2 cm2 . Using the central pixel of the array, output factors were measured for field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 to 25 × 25 cm2 . Small field profiles were compared to film measurements and output factors compared to ion chamber measurements. RESULTS The segmented scintillator measured profiles that were in good agreement with film for all three field sizes. Output factors agreed to within 1.2% of ion chamber over the field size range of 1 × 1 cm2 to 25 × 25 cm2 . At 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 the segmented scintillator underestimated the output factor compared to film and a microDiamond detector. Bulk scintillators failed to produce a good agreement with film for measured profiles and deviations from ion chamber for output factors were apparent at field sizes below 5 × 5 cm2 . In comparison to a bulk scintillator of dimensions 5 × 5 × 0.5 cm3 the etched scintillator saw a reduction of 5.1, 7.1, and 10.5 times the signal for field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 , 1 × 1 cm2 , and 2 × 2 cm2 , respectively. The reduction of signal comes from reduced cross-talk that was present in all of the bulk scintillator geometries to various degrees. CONCLUSION A 1D SPSD array was demonstrated with various scintillator designs. The etched scintillator array demonstrated excellent small field profile measurements when compared to film and output factors (down to 1 × 1 cm2 field size) when compared to micro ion chamber and diamond detector measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Hupman
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ian G Hill
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Alasdair Syme
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Nova Scotia Health Authority, QEII Health Science Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schönfeld AB, Mund K, Yan G, Schönfeld AA, Looe HK, Poppe B. Corrections of photon beam profiles of small fields measured with ionization chambers using a three-layer neural network. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:64-71. [PMID: 34633745 PMCID: PMC8664151 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to study the feasibility of photon beam profile deconvolution using a feedforward neural network (NN) in very small fields (down to 0.56 × 0.56 cm2). The method's independence of the delivery and scanning system is also investigated. Lateral beam profiles of photon fields between 0.56 × 0.56 cm2 and 4.03 × 4.03 cm2 were collected on a Siemens Artiste linear accelerator. Three scanning ionization chambers (SNC 125c, PTW 31021, and PTW 31022) of sensitive volumes ranging from 0.016 cm3 to 0.108 cm3 were used with a PTW MP3 water phantom. A reference dataset was also collected with a PTW 60019 microDiamond detector to train and test individual NNs for each ionization chamber. Further testing of the trained NNs was performed with additional test data collected on an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator using a Sun Nuclear 3D Scanner. The results were evaluated with a 1D gamma analysis (0.5 mm/0.5%). After the deconvolution, the gamma passing rates increased from 54.79% to 99.58% for the SNC 125c, from 57.09% to 99.83% for the PTW 31021, and from 91.03% to 96.36% for the PTW 31022. The delivery system, the scanning system, the scanning mode (continuous vs. step‐by‐step), and the electrometer had no significant influence on the results. This study successfully demonstrated the feasibility of using NN to correct the beam profiles of very small photon fields collected with ionization chambers of various sizes. Its independence of the delivery and scanning system was also shown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Britt Schönfeld
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Karl Mund
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Guanghua Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Hui Khee Looe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Björn Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Manavalan M, Durai M, Narayanasamy G, Stathakis S, Godson HF, Subramani V. Output factor measurements with multiple detectors in CyberKnife ® Robotic Radiosurgery System. J Cancer Res Ther 2021; 17:870-874. [PMID: 34528534 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_962_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to measure and compare the output factor (OF) of a CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System with eight different small field detectors and validate with Technical Report Series (TRS) report 483. Background Accurate dosimetry of CyberKnife system is limited due to the challenges in small field dosimetry. OF is a vital dosimetric parameter used in the photon beam modeling and any error would affect the dose calculation accuracy. Materials and Methods In this study, the OF was measured with eight different small-field detectors for the 12 IRIS collimators at 800 mm SAD setup at 15 mm depth. The detectors used were PTW 31016 PinPoint 3D, IBA PFD shielded diode, IBA EFD unshielded diode, IBA SFD unshielded diode (stereotactic), PTW 60008 shielded diode, PTW 60012 unshielded diode, PTW 60018 unshielded diode (stereotactic), and PTW 60019 CVD diamond detector. OF was obtained after correcting for field output correction factors from IAEA TRS No. 483. Results The field OFs in CyberKnife are derived from the measured data by applying the correction factors from Table 23 in TRS 483 for the eight small field detectors. These field OFs matched within 2% of peer-reviewed published values. The range and standard deviation showed a decreasing trend with collimator diameter. Conclusion The field OF obtained after applying the appropriate correction factor from TRS 483 matched well with the peer-reviewed published OFs. The inter-detector variation showed a decreasing trend with increasing collimator field size. This study gives physicists confidence in measuring field OFs while using small field detectors mentioned in this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Manigandan Durai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Ganesh Narayanasamy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | - Henry Finlay Godson
- Research & Development Centre, Bharathiyar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Blum I, Tekin T, Delfs B, Schönfeld AB, Kapsch RP, Poppe B, Looe HK. The dose response of PTW microDiamond and microSilicon in transverse magnetic field under small field conditions. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34181591 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0f2e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the present work is to investigate the behavior of two diode-type detectors (PTW microDiamond 60019 and PTW microSilicon 60023) in transverse magnetic field under small field conditions. A formalism based on TRS 483 has been proposed serving as the framework for the application of these high-resolution detectors under these conditions. Measurements were performed at the National Metrology Institute of Germany (PTB, Braunschweig) using a research clinical linear accelerator facility. Quadratic fields corresponding to equivalent square field sizesSbetween 0.63 and 4.27 cm at the depth of measurement were used. The magnetic field strength was varied up to 1.4 T. Experimental results have been complemented with Monte Carlo simulations up to 1.5 T. Detailed simulations were performed to quantify the small field perturbation effects and the influence of detector components on the dose response. The does response of both detectors decreases by up to 10% at 1.5 T in the largest field size investigated. InS = 0.63 cm, this reduction at 1.5 T is only about half of that observed in field sizesS > 2 cm for both detectors. The results of the Monte Carlo simulations show agreement better than 1% for all investigated conditions. Due to normalization at the machine specific reference field, the resulting small field output correction factors for both detectors in magnetic fieldkQclin,QmsrBare smaller than those in the magnetic field-free case, where correction up to 6.2% at 1.5 T is required for the microSilicon in the smallest field size investigated. The volume-averaging effect of both detectors was shown to be nearly independent of the magnetic field. The influence of the enhanced-density components within the detectors has been identified as the major contributors to their behaviors in magnetic field. Nevertheless, the effect becomes weaker with decreasing field size that may be partially attributed to the deficiency of low energy secondary electrons originated from distant locations in small fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Blum
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Tuba Tekin
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Björn Delfs
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Ann-Britt Schönfeld
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | - Björn Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Hui Khee Looe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bayatiani MR, Fallahi F, Aliasgharzadeh A, Ghorbani M, Khajetash B, Seif F. A comparison of symmetry and flatness measurements in small electron fields by different dosimeters in electron beam radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26:50-58. [PMID: 33948302 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Symmetry and flatness are two quantities which should be evaluated in the commissioning and quality control of an electron beam in electron beam radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to compare symmetry and flatness obtained using three different dosimeters for various small and large fields in electron beam radiotherapy with linac. Materials and methods Beam profile measurements were performed in a PTW water phantom for 10, 15 and 18 MeV electron beams of an Elekta Precise linac for small and large beams (1.5 × 1.5 cm2 to 20 × 20 cm2 field sizes). A Diode E detector and Semiflex-3D and Advanced Markus ionization chambers were used for dosimetry. Results Based on the obtained results, there are minor differences between the responses from different dosimeters (Diode E detector and Semiflex-3D and Advanced Markus ionization chambers) in measurement of symmetry and flatness for the electron beams. The symmetry and flatness values increase with increasing field size and electron beam energy for small and large field sizes, while the increases are minor in some cases. Conclusions The results indicate that the differences between the symmetry and flatness values obtained from the three dosimeter types are not practically important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Reza Bayatiani
- Medical Physics and Radiotherapy Department, School of Paramedical Sciences, Arak University of Medical Sciences and Khansari Hospital, Arak, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Fallahi
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Paramedical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Akbar Aliasgharzadeh
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Paramedical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Mahdi Ghorbani
- Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Benyamin Khajetash
- Medical Physics Department, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Seif
- Medical Physics and Radiotherapy Department, School of Paramedical Sciences, Arak University of Medical Sciences and Khansari Hospital, Arak, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maraghechi B, Kim T, Mitchell TJ, Goddu SM, Dise J, Kavanaugh JA, Zoberi JE, Mutic S, Knutson NC. Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 22:59-67. [PMID: 33300664 PMCID: PMC7856498 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The annual quality assurance (QA) of Leksell Gamma Knife® (LGK) systems are typically performed using films. Film is a good candidate for small field dosimetry due to its high spatial resolution and availability. However, there are multiple challenges with using film; film does not provide real-time measurement and requires batch-specific calibration. Our findings show that active detector-based QA can simplify the procedure and save time without loss of accuracy. METHODS Annual QA tests for a LGK Icon™ system were performed using both film-based and filmless techniques. Output calibration, relative output factors (ROF), radiation profiles, sector uniformity/source counting, and verification of the unit center point (UCP) and radiation focal point (RFP) coincidence tests were performed. Radiochromic films, two ionization chambers, and a synthetic diamond detector were used for the measurements. Results were compared and verified with the treatment planning system (TPS). RESULTS The measured dose rate of the LGK Icon was within 0.4% of the TPS value set at the time of commissioning using an ionization chamber. ROF for the 8 and 4-mm collimators were found to be 0.3% and 1.8% different from TPS values using the MicroDiamond detector and 2.6% and 1.9% different for film, respectively. Excellent agreement was found between TPS and measured dose profiles using the MicroDiamond detector which was within 1%/1 mm vs 2%/1 mm for film. Sector uniformity was found to be within 1% for all eight sectors measured using an ionization chamber. Verification of UCP and RFP coincidence using the MicroDiamond detector and pinprick film test was within 0.3 mm at isocenter for both. CONCLUSION The annual QA of a LGK Icon was successfully performed by employing filmless techniques. Comparable results were obtained using radiochromic films. Utilizing active detectors instead of films simplifies the QA process and saves time without loss of accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borna Maraghechi
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Taeho Kim
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Timothy J Mitchell
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - S Murty Goddu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Joe Dise
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - James A Kavanaugh
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jacqueline E Zoberi
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Nels C Knutson
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gul A, Fukuda S, Mizuno H, Taku N, Kakakhel MB, Mirza SM. Feasibility study of using Stereotactic Field Diode for field output factors measurement and evaluating three new detectors for small field relative dosimetry of 6 and 10 MV photon beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:23-36. [PMID: 33078544 PMCID: PMC7700919 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This study assesses the feasibility of using stereotactic field diode (SFD) as an alternate to gaf chromic films for field output factor (FF) measurement and further evaluating three new detectors for small field dosimetry. Varian 21EX linear accelerator was used to generate 6 and 10 MV beams of nominal square fields ranging from 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 to 10 × 10 cm2. One passive (EBT3 films) and five active detectors including IBA RAZOR diode(RD), SFD, RAZOR nanochamber (RNC), pinpoint chamber (PTW31023), and semiflex chamber (PTW31010) were employed. FFs were measured using films and SFD while beam profiles and percentage depth dose (PDD) distribution were acquired with active detectors. Polarity (kpol) and recombination (ks) effects of ion chambers were determined and corrected for output ratio measurement. Correction factors (CF) of RD, RNC, and PTW31023 in axial and radial orientation were also measured. Stereotactic field diode measured FFs have shown good agreement with films (with difference of <1%). RD and RNC measured beam profiles were within 3% deviation from the SFD values. Variation in kpol with field size for RNC and PTW31023 was up to 4% and 0.4% (for fields ≥ 1 × 1 cm2), respectively, while variation in ks of PTW31023 was <0.2 %. The maximum values of CF have been calculated to be 5.2%, 2.0%, 13.6%, and 25.5% for RD, RNC, PTW31023‐axial, and PTW31023‐radial respectively. This study concludes that SFD with appropriate CFs as given in TRS 483 may be used for measuring FFs as an alternate to EBT3 films. Whereas RD and RNC may be used for beam profile and PDD measurement in small fields. Considering the limit of usability of 2%, RNC may be used without CF for FF measurement in the smallfields investigated in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Attia Gul
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Physics & Applied Mathematics, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Shigekazu Fukuda
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Mizuno
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nakaji Taku
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - M Basim Kakakhel
- Department of Physics & Applied Mathematics, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Sikander M Mirza
- Department of Physics & Applied Mathematics, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cyriac SL, Liu J, Calugaru E, Chang J. A novel and effective method for validation and measurement of output factors for Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ using TRS 483 protocol. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:80-88. [PMID: 32892452 PMCID: PMC7592982 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this work was to identify the exact location of the effective point of measurement (EPM) of four different active detectors to compare the relative collimator output factors (ROF) of Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) according to IAEA TRS-483 recommendations. ROF was measured at the center of the spherical LGK-Solid Water (LGK-SW) Phantom for three (4-, 8-, and 16-mm in diameter) collimators using four (PTW-TN60008, PTW-TN60016, PTW-TN60017, and PTW-60019 diode/diamond) detectors. Since diode detectors have a much smaller sensitive volume than the PTW-31010 ion chamber used for reference dosimetry, its EPM might not be at the center of the phantom, or (100, 100, 100) of the Leksell Coordinate System, particularly in the z-direction. Hence for each diode detector, a CBCT image was acquired after it was inserted into the phantom, from which the z-Leksell coordinate of EPM was determined. Relative collimator output factors was then measured by focusing GK beams on the determined EPM of each diode. Measured ROFs were compared with the vendor-provided values in GK treatment planning system. For validation, a plan was generated to measure the output of 4-mm collimator for PTW-TN60017 at various couch locations along the z-axis. For PTW-TN60008, the percentage variations were 0.6 ± 0.4%, and -0.8 ± 0.2% for 4 and 8-mm collimators, respectively. For PTW-TN60016, the percentage variations were 0.8 ± 0.0%, and 0.2 ± 0.1%, respectively. The percentage variations were -3.3 ± 0.0% and -0.9 ± 0.1%, respectively, for PTW-TN60017, and -0.5 ± 0.0% and -0.8 ± 0.2%, respectively, for PTW-TN60019. Center of the measured profile for PTW-TN60017 was only 0.1 mm different from that identified using the CBCT. In conclusion, we have developed a simple and effective method to determine the EPMs of diode detectors when inserted into the existing LGK-SW phantom. With the acquired positional information and using TRS-483 protocol, good agreements were obtained between the measured ROFs and manufacturer recommended values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swapna Lilly Cyriac
- Department of Radiation OncologyKIMS Cancer Care and Research Center Pvt LtdThiruvananthapuramKeralaIndia
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Radiation MedicineNorthwell HealthLake SuccessNYUSA
| | - Emel Calugaru
- Department of Radiation MedicineNorthwell HealthLake SuccessNYUSA
| | - Jenghwa Chang
- Department of Radiation MedicineDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/NorthwellLake SuccessNYUSA
- Department of Physics and AstronomyHofstra UniversityHempsteadNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brace OJ, Alhujaili SF, Paino JR, Butler DJ, Wilkinson D, Oborn BM, Rosenfeld AB, Lerch MLF, Petasecca M, Davis JA. Evaluation of the PTW microDiamond in edge-on orientation for dosimetry in small fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:278-288. [PMID: 32441884 PMCID: PMC7484886 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The PTW microDiamond has an enhanced spatial resolution when operated in an edge‐on orientation but is not typically utilized in this orientation due to the specifications of the IAEA TRS‐483 code of practice for small field dosimetry. In this work the suitability of an edge‐on orientation and advantages over the recommended face‐on orientation will be presented. Methods The PTW microDiamond in both orientations was compared on a Varian TrueBeam linac for: machine output factor (OF), percentage depth dose (PDD), and beam profile measurements from 10 × 10 cm2 to a 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 field size for 6X and 6FFF beam energies in a water tank. A quantification of the stem effect was performed in edge‐on orientation along with tissue to phantom ratio (TPR) measurements. An extensive angular dependence study for the two orientations was also undertaken within two custom PMMA plastic cylindrical phantoms. Results The OF of the PTW microDiamond in both orientations agrees within 1% down to the 2 × 2 cm2 field size. The edge‐on orientation overresponds in the build‐up region but provides improved penumbra and has a maximum observed stem effect of 1%. In the edge‐on orientation there is an angular independent response with a maximum of 2% variation down to a 2 × 2 cm2 field. The PTW microDiamond in edge‐on orientation for TPR measurements agreed to the CC01 ionization chamber within 1% for all field sizes. Conclusions The microDiamond was shown to be suitable for small field dosimetry when operated in edge‐on orientation. When edge‐on, a significantly reduced angular dependence is observed with no significant stem effect, making it a more versatile QA instrument for rotational delivery techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen J Brace
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Sultan F Alhujaili
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Jason R Paino
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Duncan J Butler
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), Yallambie, VIC, UK
| | - Dean Wilkinson
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,Illawarra Cancer Care Centre Wollongong Hospital Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Brad M Oborn
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,Illawarra Cancer Care Centre Wollongong Hospital Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Anatoly B Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael L F Lerch
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeremy A Davis
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Akino Y, Fujiwara M, Okamura K, Shiomi H, Mizuno H, Isohashi F, Suzuki O, Seo Y, Tamari K, Ogawa K. Characterization of a microSilicon diode detector for small-field photon beam dosimetry. J Radiat Res 2020; 61:410-418. [PMID: 32211851 PMCID: PMC7299273 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This study characterized a new unshielded diode detector, the microSilicon (model 60023), for small-field photon beam dosimetry by evaluating the photon beams generated by a TrueBeam STx and a CyberKnife. Temperature dependence was evaluated by irradiating photons and increasing the water temperature from 11.5 to 31.3°C. For Diode E, microSilicon, microDiamond and EDGE detectors, dose linearity, dose rate dependence, energy dependence, percent-depth-dose (PDD), beam profiles and detector output factor (OFdet) were evaluated. The OFdet of the microSilicon detector was compared to the field output factors of the other detectors. The microSilicon exhibited small temperature dependence within 0.4%, although the Diode E showed a linear variation with a ratio of 0.26%/°C. The Diode E and EDGE detectors showed positive correlations between the detector reading and dose rate, whereas the microSilicon showed a stable response within 0.11%. The Diode E and microSilicon demonstrated negative correlations with the beam energy. The OFdet of microSilicon was the smallest among all the detectors. The maximum differences between the OFdet of microSilicon and the field output factors of microDiamond were 2.3 and 1.6% for 5 × 5 mm2 TrueBeam and 5 mm φ CyberKnife beams, respectively. The PDD data exhibited small variations in the dose fall-off region. The microSilicon and microDiamond detectors yielded similar penumbra widths, whereas the other detectors showed steeper penumbra profiles. The microSilicon demonstrated favorable characteristics including small temperature and dose rate dependence as well as the small spatial resolution and output factors suitable for small field dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichi Akino
- Oncology Center, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 (D10), Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suita Tokushukai Hospital, Suita, Osaka 565-0814, Japan
| | - Masateru Fujiwara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suita Tokushukai Hospital, Suita, Osaka 565-0814, Japan
| | - Keita Okamura
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hiroya Shiomi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Mizuno
- Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Isohashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Osamu Suzuki
- Department of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yuji Seo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Keisuke Tamari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lechner W, Georg D, Palmans H. An analytical formalism for the assessment of dose uncertainties due to positioning uncertainties. Med Phys 2020; 47:1357-1363. [PMID: 31880323 PMCID: PMC7078844 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present an analytical formalism for the in depth assessment of uncertainties of field output factors in small fields related to detector positioning based on dose profile measurements. Additionally, a procedure for the propagation of these uncertainties was developed. METHODS Based on the assumption that one dimensional and two dimensional second-order polynomial functions can be fitted to dose profiles of small photon beams, equations for the calculation of the expectation value, the variance, and the standard deviation were developed. The following fitting procedures of the dose profiles were considered: A one-dimensional case (1D), a quasi two-dimensional case (2Dq) based on independently measured line profiles and a full 2D case (2Df) which also considers cross-correlations in a two-dimensional dose distribution. A rectangular and a Gaussian probability density function (PDF) characterizing the probability of possible positions of the detector relative to the maximum dose were used. Uncertainty components such as the finite resolution of the scanning water phantom, the reproducibility of the determination of the position of the maximum dose, and the reproducibility of the collimator system were investigated. This formalism was tested in a 0.5 x 0.5 cm2 photon field where dose profiles were measured using a radiochromic film, a synthetic diamond detector, and an unshielded diode detector. Additionally, the dose distribution measured with the radiochromic film was convoluted with a convolution kernel mimicking the active volume of the unshielded diode. RESULTS Analytic expressions for the calculation of uncertainties on field output factors were found for the 1D, the 2Dq, and the 2Df case. The uncertainty of the field output factor related to the relative position of the detector to the maximum dose increased quadratically with increasing limits of possible detector positions. Analysis of the radiochromic film showed that the 2Dq case gave a more conservative assessment of the uncertainty compared to the 2Df case with a difference of < 0.1%. The 2Dq case applied to the film measurements agreed well with the same approach as was applied to the unshielded diode. The investigated uncertainty components propagated to an uncertainty of the field output factors of 0.5% and 0.4% for the synthetic diamond and the unshielded diode, respectively. Additionally, the expectation value was lower than the maximum dose. The difference was 0.4% and 0.3% for the synthetic diamond and the unshielded diode, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The assessment of uncertainties of field output factors related to detector positioning is feasible using the proposed formalism. The 2Dq case is applicable when using online detectors. Accurate positioning in small fields is essential for accurate dosimetry as its related uncertainty increases quadratically. The observed drop of the expectation value needs to be considered in small field dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Lechner
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hugo Palmans
- EBG MedAustron GmbH, Marie-Curie Straße 5, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.,National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW, 11 0LW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Smith CL, Montesari A, Oliver CP, Butler DJ. Evaluation of the IAEA-TRS 483 protocol for the dosimetry of small fields (square and stereotactic cones) using multiple detectors. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 21:98-110. [PMID: 31886615 PMCID: PMC7021012 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The IAEA TRS 483 protocol1 for the dosimetry of small static fields in radiotherapy was used to calculate output factors for the Elekta Synergy linac at the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). Small field output factors for both square and circular fields were measured using nine different detectors. The “corrected” output factors (ratio of detector readings multiplied by the appropriate correction factor from the protocol) showed better consistency compared to the “uncorrected” output factors (ratio of detector readings only), with the relative standard deviation decreasing by approximately 1% after the application of the relevant correction factors. Comparisons relative to an arbitrarily chosen PTW 60019 microDiamond detector showed a reduction of maximal variation for the corrected values of approximately 3%. A full uncertainty budget was prepared to analyze the consistency of the output factors. Agreement within uncertainties between all detectors and field sizes was found, except for the 15 mm circular field. The results of this study show that the application of IAEA TRS 4831 when measuring small fields will improve the consistency of small field measurements when using multiple detectors contained within the protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare L Smith
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Christopher P Oliver
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, Australia
| | - Duncan J Butler
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Alhujaili SF, Biasi G, Alzorkany F, Grogan G, Al Kafi MA, Lane J, Hug B, Aldosari AH, Alshaikh S, Farzad PR, Ebert MA, Moftah B, Rosenfeld AB, Petasecca M. Quality assurance of Cyberknife robotic stereotactic radiosurgery using an angularly independent silicon detector. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 20:76-88. [PMID: 30565856 PMCID: PMC6333148 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this work was to evaluate the use of an angularly independent silicon detector (edgeless diodes) developed for dosimetry in megavoltage radiotherapy for Cyberknife in a phantom and for patient quality assurance (QA). Method The characterization of the edgeless diodes has been performed on Cyberknife with fixed and IRIS collimators. The edgeless diode probes were tested in terms of basic QA parameters such as measurements of tissue‐phantom ratio (TPR), output factor and off‐axis ratio. The measurements were performed in both water and water‐equivalent phantoms. In addition, three patient‐specific plans have been delivered to a lung phantom with and without motion and dose measurements have been performed to verify the ability of the diodes to work as patient‐specific QA devices. The data obtained by the edgeless diodes have been compared to PTW 60016, SN edge, PinPoint ionization chamber, Gafchromic EBT3 film, and treatment planning system (TPS). Results The TPR measurement performed by the edgeless diodes show agreement within 2.2% with data obtained with PTW 60016 diode for all the field sizes. Output factor agrees within 2.6% with that measured by SN EDGE diodes corrected for their field size dependence. The beam profiles’ measurements of edgeless diodes match SN EDGE diodes with a measured full width half maximum (FWHM) within 2.3% and penumbra widths within 0.148 mm. Patient‐specific QA measurements demonstrate an agreement within 4.72% in comparison with TPS. Conclusion The edgeless diodes have been proved to be an excellent candidate for machine and patient QA for Cyberknife reproducing commercial dosimetry device measurements without need of angular dependence corrections. However, further investigation is required to evaluate the effect of their dose rate dependence on complex brain cancer dose verification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sultan Fahad Alhujaili
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Aljouf University, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia
| | - Giordano Biasi
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Faisal Alzorkany
- Biomedical Physics Department, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Garry Grogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Muhammed A Al Kafi
- Biomedical Physics Department, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jonathan Lane
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Churchill Hospital), Oxford, UK
| | - Benjamin Hug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,School of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | | | - Pejman Rowshan Farzad
- School of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,School of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Belal Moftah
- Biomedical Physics Department, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Anatoly B Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Xu Z, Warrell G, Lee S, Colussi V, Zheng Y, Ellis R, Machtay M, Podder T. Assessment of beam-matched linacs quality/accuracy for interchanging SBRT or SRT patient using VMAT without replanning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 20:68-75. [PMID: 30402983 PMCID: PMC6333115 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2017] [Revised: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Dosimetric accuracy is critical when switching a patient treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SRT) among beam-matched linacs. In this study, the dose delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for SBRT/SRT patients were evaluated on three beam-matched linacs. METHOD Beam data measurements such as percentage depth dose (PDD10 ), beam profiles, output factors, and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf transmission factor for 6 MV photon beam were performed on three beam-matched linacs. The Edge™ diode detector was used for measurements of beams of field size less than 5 × 5 cm2 . Ten lung and 15 brain plans were generated using VMAT with the same beam model. Modulation complexity score of the VMAT plan (MCSv) was used as a plan complexity indicator. Doses were measured using ArcCHECK™ and GafChromic™ EBT3 films. The measurements were compared with calculated doses through absolute dose gamma comparison using 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria. Correlation between difference in passing rates among beam-matched linacs and MCSv was evaluated using the Pearson coefficient. Point doses were measured with the A1SL micro ion chamber. RESULTS Difference in beam outputs, beam profiles, and MLC leaf transmission factors of beam-matched linacs were all within ±1%, except the difference in output factor for 1 × 1 cm2 field between linac 1 and 3 (1.3%). For all 25 cases, passing rates of measured doses on three linacs were all higher than 90% when using 2%/2 mm gamma criteria. The average difference in point dose measurements among three beam-matched linacs was 0.1 ± 0.2% (P > 0.05, one-way ANOVA). CONCLUSION Minimal differences in beam parameters, point doses, and passing rates among three linacs proved the viability of swapping SBRT/SRT using VMAT among beam-matched linacs. The effect of plan complexity on passing rate difference among beam-matched linacs is not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengzheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gregory Warrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Soyoung Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Valdir Colussi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.,School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yiran Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rodney Ellis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.,School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.,School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tarun Podder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.,School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gharehaghaji N, Dadgar HA. Dosimetric verification of small fields in the lung using lung-equivalent polymer gel and Monte Carlo simulation. J Cancer Res Ther 2018. [PMID: 29516907 DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.191040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The main purpose of this study was evaluate a polymer-gel-dosimeter (PGD) for three-dimensional verification of dose distributions in the lung that is called lung-equivalent gel (LEG) and then to compare its result with Monte Carlo (MC) method. Materials and Methods In the present study, to achieve a lung density for PGD, gel is beaten until foam is obtained, and then sodium dodecyl sulfate is added as a surfactant to increase the surface tension of the gel. The foam gel was irradiated with 1 cm × 1 cm field size in the 6 MV photon beams of ONCOR SIEMENS LINAC, along the central axis of the gel. The LEG was then scanned on a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner after irradiation using a multiple-spin echo sequence. Least-square fitting the pixel values from 32 consecutive images using a single exponential decay function derived the R2 relaxation rates. Moreover, 6 and 18 MV photon beams of ONCOR SIEMENS LINAC are simulated using MCNPX MC Code. The MC model is used to calculate the depth dose water and low-density water resembling the soft tissue and lung, respectively. Results Percentages of dose reduction in the lung region relative to homogeneous phantom for 6 MV photon beam were 44.6%, 39%, 13%, and 7% for 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, 2 cm × 2 cm, and 3 cm × 3 cm fields, respectively. For 18 MV photon beam, the results were found to be 82%, 69%, 46%, and 25.8% for the same field sizes, respectively. Preliminary results show good agreement between depth dose measured with the LEG and the depth dose calculated using MCNP code. Conclusion Our study showed that the dose reduction with small fields in the lung was very high. Thus, inaccurate prediction of absorbed dose inside the lung and also lung/soft-tissue interfaces with small photon beams may lead to critical consequences for treatment outcome.
Collapse
|
28
|
Huq MS, Hwang MS, Teo TP, Jang SY, Heron DE, Lalonde RJ. A dosimetric evaluation of the IAEA-AAPM TRS483 code of practice for dosimetry of small static fields used in conventional linac beams and comparison with IAEA TRS-398, AAPM TG51, and TG51 Addendum protocols. Med Phys 2018; 45:4257-4273. [PMID: 30009526 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 06/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) have jointly published a new code of practice (CoP), TRS483, for the dosimetry of small static photon fields used in external beam radiotherapy. It gave recommendations on how to perform reference dosimetry in nonstandard machine-specific reference (msr) fields and measure field output factors in small fields. The purpose of this work was to perform a dosimetric evaluation of the recommendations given in this CoP. METHODS All measurements were done in a Varian TrueBeam™ STx linear accelerator. Five ionization chambers were used for beam quality measurements, four Farmer type ionization chambers for performing reference dosimetry and two diodes for performing field output factor measurements. Field output factor measurements were done for fourteen field sizes (ranging from 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm). Beam energies used were: 6 MV WFF, 6 MV FFF, 10 MV WFF, and 10 MV FFF. Where appropriate, results from this study were compared with those obtained from the recommendations given in the IAEA TRS398 CoP, AAPM TG51 and TG51 Addendum protocols. RESULTS Beam quality measurements show that for all beam energies and for equivalent square msr field sizes ranging from 4 cm × 4 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm, agreement between calculated and measured values of TPR20,10 (10) was within 0.6%. When %dd(10,10)X was used as beam quality specifier, the agreement was found to be within 0.8%. Absorbed dose to water per unit monitor unit at the depth of maximum dose zmax in a beam of quality Q, Dw,Qzmax/MU, was determined using both %dd(10,10)X and TPR20,10 (10) as beam quality specifiers. Measured ratios of Dw,Q (zmax )/MU, determined using the two approaches, ranged between 0.999 and 1.000 for all the beam energies investigated. Comparison with TRS398, TG51 and TG51 addendum protocols show that depending on beam energy, the mean values of the ratios TRS398/TRS483, TG51/TRS483, and TG51 Addendum/TRS483 of Dw,Q (zmax )/MU determined using both approaches show excellent agreement with TRS398 CoP (to within 0.05%); agreement with TG51 and TG51 addendum was to within 0.3% for all four beam energies investigated. Field output factors, determined using the two methods recommended in the TRS483 CoP, showed excellent agreement between the two methods. For the 1 cm collimator field size, the mean value of the field output factor obtained from an average of the two detectors investigated was found to be 2% lower than the mean value of the uncorrected ratio of readings. CONCLUSION For beams with and without flattening filters, the values of Dw,Q (zmax )/MU obtained following the new CoP are found to be consistent with those obtained using TRS398, TG51 and TG51 addendum protocols to within 0.3%. Field output factors for small beams can be improved when the correction factors for different detectors included in TRS483 are appropriately incorporated into their dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Saiful Huq
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Min-Sig Hwang
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Troy P Teo
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Si Young Jang
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Dwight E Heron
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Ronald J Lalonde
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
With the advent of complex and precise radiation therapy techniques, the use of relatively small fields is needed. Using such field sizes can cause uncertainty in dosimetry; therefore, special attention is required both in dose calculations and measurements. There are several challenges in small-field dosimetry such as the steep gradient of the radiation field, volume averaging effect, lack of charged particle equilibrium, partial occlusion of radiation source, beam alignment, and unable to use a reference dosimeter. Due to these challenges, special dosimeters are needed for small-field dosimetry, and this review article discusses this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wrya Parwaie
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Soheila Refahi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | - Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Bagher Farhood
- Department of Radiology and Medical Physics, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Shukaili KA, Corde S, Petasecca M, Pereveratylo V, Lerch M, Jackson M, Rosenfeld A. "Characterization of ELEKTA SRS cone collimator using high spatial resolution monolithic silicon detector array". J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:114-124. [PMID: 29790261 PMCID: PMC6036391 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Revised: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the accuracy of the dosimetry of radiation fields produced by small ELEKTA cone collimators used for stereotactic radiosurgery treatments (SRS) using commercially available detectors EBT3 GafchromicTM film, IBA Stereotactic diode (SFD), and the recently developed detector DUO, which is a monolithic silicon orthogonal linear diode array detector. METHODS These three detectors were used for the measurement of beam profiles, output factors, and percentage depth dose for SRS cone collimators with cone sizes ranging from 5 to 50 mm diameter. The measurements were performed at 10 cm depth and 90 cm SSD. RESULTS The SRS cone beam profiles measured with DUO, EBT3 film, and IBA SFD agreed well, results being in agreement within ±0.5 mm in the FWHM, and ±0.7 mm in the penumbra region. The output factor measured by DUO with 0.5 mm air gap above agrees within ±1% with EBT3. The OF measured by IBA SFD (corrected for the over-response) agreed with both EBT3 and DUO within ±2%. All three detectors agree within ±2% for PDD measurements for all SRS cones. CONCLUSIONS The characteristics of the ELEKTA SRS cone collimator have been evaluated by using a monolithic silicon high spatial resolution detector DUO, EBT3, and IBA SFD diode. The DUO detector is suitable for fast real-time quality assurance dosimetry in small radiation fields typical for SRS/SRT. This has been demonstrated by its good agreement of measured doses with EBT 3 films.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalsa Al Shukaili
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNSWAustralia
- National Oncology CentreRoyal HospitalMuscatOman
| | - Stéphanie Corde
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNSWAustralia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research InstituteWollongongNSWAustralia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer CentrePrince of Wales HospitalRandwickNSWAustralia
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNSWAustralia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research InstituteWollongongNSWAustralia
| | | | - Michael Lerch
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNSWAustralia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research InstituteWollongongNSWAustralia
| | - Michael Jackson
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNSWAustralia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer CentrePrince of Wales HospitalRandwickNSWAustralia
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNSWAustralia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research InstituteWollongongNSWAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Duncan M, Newall MK, Caillet V, Booth JT, Keall PJ, Lerch M, Perevertaylo V, Rosenfeld AB, Petasecca M. Real-time high spatial resolution dose verification in stereotactic motion adaptive arc radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:173-184. [PMID: 29873185 PMCID: PMC6036363 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiation treatments delivered with real‐time multileaf collimator (MLC) tracking currently lack fast pretreatment or real‐time quality assurance. The purpose of this study is to test a 2D silicon detector, MagicPlate‐512 (MP512), in a complex clinical environment involving real‐time reconfiguration of the MLC leaves during target tracking. Methods MP512 was placed in the center of a solid water phantom and mounted on a motion platform used to simulate three different patient motions. Electromagnetic target tracking was implemented using the Calypso system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and an MLC tracking software. A two‐arc VMAT plan was delivered and 2D dose distributions were reconstructed by MP512, EBT3 film, and the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). Dose maps were compared using gamma analysis with 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm acceptance criteria. Dose profiles were generated in sup‐inf and lateral directions to show the agreement of MP512 to EBT3 and to highlight the efficacy of the MLC tracking system in mitigating the effect of the simulated patient motion. Results Using a 3%/3 mm acceptance criterion for 2D gamma analysis, MP512 to EBT3 film agreement was 99% and MP512 to TPS agreement was 100%. For a 2%/2 mm criterion, the agreement was 95% and 98%, respectively. Full width at half maximum and 80%/20% penumbral width of the MP512 and EBT3 dose profiles agreed within 1 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. Patient motion increased the measured dose profile penumbral width by nearly 2 mm (with respect to the no‐motion case); however, the MLC tracking strategy was able to mitigate 80% of this effect. Conclusions MP512 is capable of high spatial resolution 2D dose reconstruction during adaptive MLC tracking, including arc deliveries. It shows potential as an effective tool for 2D small field dosimetry and pretreatment quality assurance for MLC tracking modalities. These results provide confidence that detector‐based pretreatment dosimetry is clinically feasible despite fast real‐time MLC reconfigurations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Duncan
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew K Newall
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Vincent Caillet
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeremy T Booth
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul J Keall
- Radiation Physics Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Lerch
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Anatoly B Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kupfer T, Lehmann J, Butler DJ, Ramanathan G, Bailey TE, Franich RD. Commissioning of a PTW 34070 large-area plane-parallel ionization chamber for small field megavoltage photon dosimetry. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:206-217. [PMID: 28980432 PMCID: PMC5689907 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigates a large-area plane-parallel ionization chamber (LAC) for measurements of dose-area product in water (DAPw ) in megavoltage (MV) photon fields. METHODS Uniformity of electrode separation of the LAC (PTW34070 Bragg Peak Chamber, sensitive volume diameter: 8.16 cm) was measured using high-resolution microCT. Signal dependence on angle α of beam incidence for square 6 MV fields of side length s = 20 cm and 1 cm was measured in air. Polarity and recombination effects were characterized in 6, 10, and 18 MV photons fields. To assess the lateral setup tolerance, scanned LAC profiles of a 1 × 1 cm2 field were acquired. A 6 MV calibration coefficient, ND,w,LAC , was determined in a field collimated by a 5 cm diameter stereotactic cone with known DAPw . Additional calibrations in 10 × 10 cm2 fields at 6, 10, and 18 MV were performed. RESULTS Electrode separation is uniform and agrees with specifications. Volume-averaging leads to a signal increase proportional to ~1/cos(α) in small fields. Correction factors for polarity and recombination range between 0.9986 to 0.9996 and 1.0007 to 1.0024, respectively. Off-axis displacement by up to 0.5 cm did not change the measured signal in a 1 × 1 cm2 field. ND,w,LAC was 163.7 mGy cm-2 nC-1 and differs by +3.0% from the coefficient derived in the 10 × 10 cm2 6 MV field. Response in 10 and 18 MV fields increased by 1.0% and 2.7% compared to 6 MV. CONCLUSIONS The LAC requires only small correction factors for DAPw measurements and shows little energy dependence. Lateral setup errors of 0.5 cm are tolerated in 1 × 1 cm2 fields, but beam incidence must be kept as close to normal as possible. Calibration in 10 × 10 fields is not recommended because of the LAC's over-response. The accuracy of relative point-dose measurements in the field's periphery is an important limiting factor for the accuracy of DAPw measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Kupfer
- School of ScienceRMIT UniversityMelbourneVic.Australia
- Radiation Oncology CentreAustin HealthHeidelbergVic.Australia
| | - Joerg Lehmann
- School of ScienceRMIT UniversityMelbourneVic.Australia
- Faculty of ScienceThe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNSWAustralia
| | - Duncan J. Butler
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety AgencyYallambieVic.Australia
| | - Ganesan Ramanathan
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety AgencyYallambieVic.Australia
| | - Tracy E. Bailey
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety AgencyYallambieVic.Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Agarwal A, Rastogi N, Maria Das KJ, Yoganathan SA, Udayakumar D, Kumar S. Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements. J Med Phys 2017; 42:59-64. [PMID: 28706350 PMCID: PMC5496271 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_131_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: With the advent of state-of-the-art treatment technologies, the use of small fields has increased, and dosimetry in small fields is highly challenging. In this study, the potential use of Varian electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for small field measurements was explored for 6 and 15 MV photon beams. Materials and Methods: The output factors and profiles were measured for a range of jaw-collimated square field sizes starting from 0.8 cm × 0.8 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm using EPID. For evaluation purpose, reference data were acquired using Exradin A16 microionization chamber (0.007 cc) for output factors and stereotactic field diode for profile measurements in a radiation field analyzer. Results: The output factors of EPID were in agreement with the reference data for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm and for 2 cm × 2 cm; the difference in output factors was +2.06% for 6 MV and +1.56% for 15 MV. For the lowest field size studied (0.8 cm × 0.8 cm), the differences were maximum; +16% for 6 MV and +23% for 15 MV photon beam. EPID profiles of both energies were closely matching with reference profiles for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm; however, penumbra and measured field size of EPID profiles were slightly lower compared to its counterpart. Conclusions: EPID is a viable option for profile and output factor measurements for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm in the absence of appropriate small field dosimeters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpita Agarwal
- Department of Physics, School of Sciences, IFTM University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Nikhil Rastogi
- Department of Physics, School of Sciences, IFTM University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - K J Maria Das
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - S A Yoganathan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - D Udayakumar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shaleen Kumar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Stansook N, Utitsarn K, Petasecca M, Newall MK, Duncan M, Nitschke K, Carolan M, Metcalfe P, Lerch MLF, Perevertaylo VL, Tomé WA, Rosenfeld AB. Technical Note: Angular dependence of a 2D monolithic silicon diode array for small field dosimetry. Med Phys 2017; 44:4313-4321. [PMID: 28556261 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2017] [Revised: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to investigate the 2D monolithic silicon diode array size of 52 × 52 mm2 (MP512) angular response. An angular correction method has been developed that improves the accuracy of dose measurement in a small field. METHODS The MP512 was placed at the center of a cylindrical phantom, irradiated using 6 MV and 10 MV photons and incrementing the incidence of the beam angle in 15° steps from 0° to 180°, and then in 1° steps between 85° and 95°. The MP512 response was characterized for square field sizes varying between 1 × 1 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2 . The angular correction factor was obtained as the ratio of MP512 response to EBT3 film measured doses as a function of the incidence angle (Ɵ) and was normalized at 0° incidence angle. Beam profiles of the corrected MP512 responses were compared with the EBT3 responses to verify the effectiveness of the method adopted. RESULTS The intrinsic angular dependence of the MP512 shows maximum relative deviation from the response normalized to 0° of 18.5 ± 0.5% and 15.5 ± 0.5% for 6 MV and 10 MV, respectively, demonstrating that the angular response is sensitive to the energy. In contrast, the variation of angular response is less affected by field size. Comparison of cross-plane profiles measured by the corrected MP512 and EBT3 shows an agreement within ±2% for all field sizes when the beams irradiated the array at 0°, 45°, 135°, and 180° angles of incidence from the normal to the detector plane. At 90° incidence, corresponding to a depth dose measurement, up to a 6% discrepancy was observed for a 1 × 1 cm2 field of 6 MV. CONCLUSION An angular correction factor can be adopted for small field sizes. Measurements discrepancies could be encountered when irradiating with very small fields parallel to the detector plane. Using this approach, the MP512 is shown to be a suitable detector for 2D dose mapping of small field size photon beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nauljun Stansook
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Kananan Utitsarn
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.,Illawarra Heath Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
| | - Matthew K Newall
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia
| | - Mitchell Duncan
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia
| | - Kym Nitschke
- Illawarra Heath Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
| | - Martin Carolan
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.,Illawarra Heath Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia
| | - Peter Metcalfe
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia
| | - Michael L F Lerch
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.,Illawarra Heath Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
| | | | - Wolfgang A Tomé
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Anatoly B Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.,Illawarra Heath Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gardner SJ, Lu S, Liu C, Wen N, Chetty IJ. Tuning of AcurosXB source size setting for small intracranial targets. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:170-181. [PMID: 28470819 PMCID: PMC5689841 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study details a method to evaluate the source size selection for small field intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) deliveries in Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) for AcurosXB dose calculation algorithm. Our method uses end‐to‐end dosimetric data to evaluate a total of five source size selections (0.50 mm, 0.75 mm, 1.00 mm, 1.25 mm, and 1.50 mm). The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was varied in this analysis (three DLG values were tested for each scenario). We also tested two MLC leaf designs (standard and high‐definition MLC) and two delivery types for intracranial SRS (volumetric modulated arc therapy [VMAT] and dynamic conformal arc [DCA]). Thus, a total of 10 VMAT plans and 10 DCA plans were tested for each machine type (TrueBeam [standard MLC] and Edge [high‐definition MLC]). Each plan was mapped to a solid water phantom and dose was calculated with each iteration of source size and DLG value (15 total dose calculations for each plan). To measure the dose, Gafchromic film was placed in the coronal plane of the solid water phantom at isocenter. The phantom was localized via on‐board CBCT and the plans were delivered at planned gantry, collimator, and couch angles. The planned and measured film dose was compared using Gamma (3.0%, 0.3 mm) criteria. The vendor‐recommended 1.00 mm source size was suitable for TrueBeam planning (both VMAT and DCA planning) and Edge DCA planning. However, for Edge VMAT planning, the 0.50 mm source size yielded the highest passing rates. The difference in dose calculation among the source size variations manifested primarily in two regions of the dose calculation: (1) the shoulder of the high‐dose region, and (2) for small targets (volume ≤ 0.30 cc), in the central portion of the high‐dose region. Selection of a larger than optimal source size can result in increased blurring of the shoulder for all target volume sizes tested, and can result in central axis dose discrepancies in excess of 10% for target volumes sizes ≤ 0.30 cc. Our results indicate a need for evaluation of the source size when AcurosXB is used to model intracranial SRS delivery, and our methods represent a feasible process for many clinics to perform tuning of the AcurosXB source size parameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Gardner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Siming Lu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Commack, NY, USA
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ning Wen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Indrin J Chetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chaudhari SH, Dobhal R, Kinhikar RA, Kadam SS, Deshpande DD. Measurement of Total Scatter Factor for Stereotactic Cones with Plastic Scintillation Detector. J Med Phys 2017; 42:9-13. [PMID: 28405102 PMCID: PMC5370342 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_114_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced radiotherapy modalities such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and image-guided radiotherapy may employ very small beam apertures for accurate localized high dose to target. Accurate measurement of small radiation fields is a well-known challenge for many dosimeters. The purpose of this study was to measure total scatter factors for stereotactic cones with plastic scintillation detector and its comparison against diode detector and theoretical estimates. Measurements were performed on Novalis Tx™ linear accelerator for 6MV SRS beam with stereotactic cones of diameter 6 mm, 7.5 mm, 10 mm, 12.5 mm, and 15 mm. The advantage of plastic scintillator detector is in its energy dependence. The total scatter factor was measured in water at the depth of dose maximum. Total scatter factor with plastic scintillation detector was determined by normalizing the readings to field size of 10 cm × 10 cm. To overcome energy dependence of diode detector for the determination of scatter factor with diode detector, daisy chaining method was used. The plastic scintillator detector was calibrated against the ionization chamber, and the reproducibility in the measured doses was found to be within ± 1%. Total scatter factor measured with plastic scintillation detector was 0.728 ± 0.3, 0.783 ± 0.05, 0.866 ± 0.55, 0.885 ± 0.5, and 0.910 ± 0.06 for cone sizes of 6 mm, 7.5 mm, 10 mm, 12.5 mm, and 15 mm, respectively. Total scatter factor measured with diode detector was 0.733 ± 0.03, 0.782 ± 0.02, 0.834 ± 0.07, 0.854 ± 0.02, and 0.872 ± 0.02 for cone sizes of 6 mm, 7.5 mm, 10 mm, 12.5 mm, and 15 mm, respectively. The variation in the measurement of total scatter factor with published Monte Carlo data was found to be −1.3%, 1.9%, −0.4%, and 0.4% for cone sizes of 7.5 mm, 10 mm, 12.5 mm, and 15 mm, respectively. We conclude that total scatter factor measurements for stereotactic cones can be adequately carried out with a plastic scintillation detector. Our results show a high level of consistency within our data and compared well with published data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suresh H Chaudhari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rishabh Dobhal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajesh A Kinhikar
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudarshan S Kadam
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deepak D Deshpande
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Godson HF, Ravikumar M, Sathiyan S, Ganesh KM, Ponmalar YR, Varatharaj C. Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings. J Med Phys 2016; 41:12-20. [PMID: 27051165 PMCID: PMC4795411 DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.177284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent of modern technologies in radiotherapy poses an increased challenge in the determination of dosimetric parameters of small fields that exhibit a high degree of uncertainty. Percent depth dose and beam profiles were acquired using different detectors in two different orientations. The parameters such as relative surface dose (DS), depth of dose maximum (Dmax), percentage dose at 10 cm (D10), penumbral width, flatness, and symmetry were evaluated with different detectors. The dosimetric data were acquired for fields defined by jaws alone, multileaf collimator (MLC) alone, and by MLC while the jaws were positioned at 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 cm away from MLC leaf-end using a Varian linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beam. The accuracy in the measurement of dosimetric parameters with various detectors for three different field definitions was evaluated. The relative DS(38.1%) with photon field diode in parallel orientation was higher than electron field diode (EFD) (27.9%) values for 1 cm ×1 cm field. An overestimation of 5.7% and 8.6% in D10 depth were observed for 1 cm ×1 cm field with RK ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation, respectively, for the fields defined by MLC while jaw positioned at the edge of the field when compared to EFD values in parallel orientation. For this field definition, the in-plane penumbral widths obtained with ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation were 3.9 mm, 5.6 mm for 1 cm ×1 cm field, respectively. Among all detectors used in the study, the unshielded diodes were found to be an appropriate choice of detector for the measurement of beam parameters in small fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Finlay Godson
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India; Department of Radiotherapy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - M Ravikumar
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - S Sathiyan
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - K M Ganesh
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Y Retna Ponmalar
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India; Department of Radiotherapy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - C Varatharaj
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kuess P, Bozsaky E, Hopfgartner J, Seifritz G, Dörr W, Georg D. Dosimetric challenges of small animal irradiation with a commercial X-ray unit. Z Med Phys 2014; 24:363-72. [PMID: 25270978 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2014.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2013] [Revised: 05/15/2014] [Accepted: 08/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A commercial X-ray unit was recently installed at the Medical University Vienna for partial and whole body irradiation of small experimental animals. For 200 kV X-rays the dose deviations with respect to the reference dose measured in the geometrical center of the potential available field size was investigated for various experimental setup plates used for mouse irradiations. Furthermore, the HVL was measured in mm Al and mm Cu at 200 kV for two types of filtration. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three different setup constructions for small animal irradiation were dosimetrically characterized, covering field sizes from 9×20 mm2 to 210×200 mm2. Different types of detectors were investigated. Additionally LiF:MG,Ti TLD chips were used for mouse in-vivo dosimetry. RESULTS The use of an additional 0.5 mm Cu filter reduced the deviation of the dose between each irradiation position on the setup plates. Multiple animals were irradiated at the same time using an individual setup plate for each experimental purpose. The dose deviations of each irradiation position to the center was measured to be ±4% or better. The depth dose curve measured in a solid water phantom was more pronounced for smaller field sizes. The comparison between estimated dose and measured dose in a PMMA phantom regarding the dose decline yielded in a difference of 3.9% at 20 mm depth. In-vivo measurements in a mouse snouts irradiation model confirmed the reference dosimetry, accomplished in PMMA phantoms, in terms of administered dose and deviation within different points of measurement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The outlined experiments dealt with a wide variety of dosimetric challenges during the installation of a new X-ray unit in the laboratory. The depth dose profiles measured for different field sizes were in good agreement with literature data. Different field sizes and spatial arrangement of the animals (depending on each purpose) provide additional challenges for the dosimetric measurements. Thorough dosimetric commissioning has to be performed before a new experimental setup is approved for biological experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Kuess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Eva Bozsaky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Johannes Hopfgartner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Gerhard Seifritz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Dörr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|