Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields

Purpose

The purpose of this work is to evaluate the Standard Imaging Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector (W2) for use in the types of fields used for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Methods

Prior to testing the W2 in small fields, the W2 was evaluated in standard large field conditions to ensure good detector performance. These tests included energy dependence, short‐term repeatability, dose‐response linearity, angular dependence, temperature dependence, and dose rate dependence. Next, scan settings and calibration of the W2 were optimized to ensure high quality data acquisition. Profiles of small fields shaped by cones and multi‐leaf collimator (MLCs) were measured using the W2 and IBA RAZOR diode in a scanning water tank. Output factors for cones (4–17.5 mm) and MLC fields (1, 2, 3 cm) were acquired with both detectors. Finally, the dose at isocenter for seven radiosurgery plans was measured with the W2 detector.

Results

W2 exhibited acceptable warm‐up behavior, short‐term reproducibility, axial angular dependence, dose‐rate linearity, and dose linearity. The detector exhibits a dependence upon energy, polar angle, and temperature. Scanning measurements taken with the W2 and RAZOR were in good agreement, with full‐width half‐maximum and penumbra widths agreeing to within 0.1 mm. The output factors measured by the W2 and RAZOR exhibited a maximum difference of 1.8%. For the seven point‐dose measurements of radiosurgery plans, the W2 agreed well with our treatment planning system with a maximum deviation of 2.2%. The Čerenkov light ratio calibration method did not significantly impact the measurement of relative profiles, output factors, or point dose measurements.

Conclusion

The W2 demonstrated dosimetric characteristics that are suitable for radiosurgery field measurements. The detector agreed well with the RAZOR diode for output factors and scanned profiles and showed good agreement with the treatment planning system in measurements of clinical treatment plans.

Cosmic ray flux and lockdown due to COVID-19 in Kolkata - Any correlation?

Cosmic ray muon flux is measured by the coincidence technique using plastic scintillation detectors in the High Energy Physics Detector Laboratory at Bose Institute, Kolkata. Due to the COVID-19 outbreak and nationwide complete lockdown, the laboratory was closed from the end of March 2020 till the end of May 2020. After lockdown, although the city is not in its normal state, we still were able to take data on some days. The lockdown imposed a strict restriction on the transport service other than the emergency ones and also most of the industries were shut down in and around the city. This lockdown has significant effect on the atmospheric conditions in terms of change in the concentration of air pollutants. We have measured the cosmic ray flux before and after the lockdown to observe the apparent change if any, due to change in the atmospheric conditions. In this article, we report the measured cosmic ray flux at Kolkata (22.58∘ N 88.42∘ E and 11 m above the Sea Level) along with the major air pollutants present in the atmosphere before and after the lockdown.

Fabrication and characterization of a stemless plastic scintillation detector

PURPOSE

To fabricate a stemless plastic scintillation detector (SPSD) and characterize its linearity and reproducibility, and its dependence on energy and dose per pulse; and to apply it to clinical PDD and output factor measurements.

METHODS

An organic bulk heterojunction photodiode was fabricated by spin coating a blend of P3HT and PCBM onto an ITO-coated glass substrate and depositing aluminum top contacts. Eljen scintillators (~5 × 5 × 5 mm³ ; EJ-204, EJ-208, and EJ-260) or Saint-Gobain scintillators (~3 × 3 × 2 mm³ ; BC-400 and BC-412) were placed on the opposite side of the glass using a silicone grease (optical coupling agent) creating the SPSD. Energy dependence was measured by using 100, 180, and 300 kVp photon beams from an orthovoltage treatment unit (Xstrahl 300) and 6 and 10 MV photons from a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. Linearity, dose per pulse dependence, output factors, and PDDs were measured using a 6 MV photon beam. PDDs and output factors were compared to ion chamber measurements. A control device was fabricated by substituting polystyrene (PS) for the P3HT/PCBM layer. No photocurrent should be generated in the control device and so any current measured is due to Compton current in the electrodes, wires, and surroundings from the irradiation. Output factors were corrected by subtracting the signal measured using the control device from the photodiode measured signal to yield the photocurrent.

RESULTS

Each SPSD had excellent linearity with dose having an r² of 1 and sensitivities of 1.07 nC/cGy, 1.04 nC/cGy, 1.00 nC/cGy and 0.10 nC/cGy, and 0.10 nC/cGy for EJ-204, EJ-208, EJ-260 (5 × 5 × 5 mm³ volumes), BC-400, and BC-412 (3 × 3 × 2 mm³ volumes), respectively. No significant dose per pulse dependence was measured. Output factors matched within 1% for the large scintillators for field sizes of 5 × 5 cm² to 25 × 25 cm² , but there was a large under-response at field sizes below 3 × 3 cm² . After correcting the signal of the small scintillators by subtracting the current measured using the PS control, the output factors agreed with the ion chamber measurements within 1% from field sizes 1 × 1 cm² to 20 × 20 cm² . The impact of Cerenkov emissions in the scintillator was effectively corrected with a simple reflective coating on the scintillator. In comparison to a 6 MV photon beam, the large scintillator SPSDs exhibited 37%, 52%, and 73% of the response at energies 100 kVp, 180 kVp and 300 kVp, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The principle of the SPSD was demonstrated. Devices had excellent linearity, reproducibility, and no significant dose per pulse dependence, and a simple reflective coating was sufficient to correct for Cerenkov emissions from within the scintillator. The devices demonstrated similar energy dependence to other scintillator detectors used in a radiotherapy setting.

Characteristics of the Exradin W1 scintillator in the magnetic field

To investigate the angular dependency of the W1 scintillator with and without a magnetic field, the beam incidence angles to the detector varied from 0° to 360° at intervals of 30° when the detector was pointed in both the craniocaudal and right‐to‐left directions. The beam incidence angles also varied from 0° to 360° at intervals of 45° when the W1 scintillator was in the anterior‐to‐posterior direction. To investigate the field size dependency of the W1 scintillator with and without a magnetic field, the doses by an identical beam‐on time were measured at various square field sizes and the measured doses were normalized to the dose at the field of 10.5 cm × 10.5 cm (FS10.5). With and without a magnetic field, the deviations of the doses to the dose at the beam incident angle of 0° were always less than 1% regardless of the dosimeter positioning relative to the magnetic field direction. When the field sizes were equal to or less than FS10.5, the differences in the output factors with and without a magnetic field were less than 0.7%. However, those were larger than 1% at fields larger than FS10.5, and up to 3.1%. The W1 scintillator showed no angular dependency to the magnetic field. Differences larger than 1% in the output factors with and without a magnetic field were observed at field sizes larger than 10.5 cm × 10.5 cm.

A real-time method to simultaneously measure linear energy transfer and dose for proton therapy using organic scintillators

PURPOSE

Currently, no detectors are capable of simultaneously measuring dose and linear energy transfer (LET) in real time. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of exploiting the difference in the response of various organic plastic scintillation detectors to measure LET and dose in therapeutic proton beams. The hypothesis behind this work was that the ratio of the responses of different scintillators exposed to the same proton beam can be used to obtain a LET vs ratio calibration curve that can then be used to infer LET under any other measurement conditions.

METHODS

We first used similar scintillators with different ionization quenching factors. LET values for different irradiation conditions were calculated using a validated Monte Carlo model of the proton beam line. The quenching factors in the Birks equation for different scintillators as a function of LET were obtained from measurements in a 100-MeV pristine proton beam. We then used four different organic scintillation materials - polystyrene (BCF-12), poly (methyl methacrylate), polyvinyltoluene, and a liquid scintillator - for which the LET response varied with regard to not only quenching but also differences in material density and relative stopping power. We simultaneously exposed the four different organic scintillators and a plane-parallel ion chamber to passively scattered proton beams at fluence-averaged LET. Comparisons to the expected values obtained from the Monte Carlo simulations were made on the basis of both dose and LET.

RESULTS

The maximum difference in the quenching factor was 20%, resulting in a 5% change in LET with a response ratio over a range of 5 keV/μm. Among all the scintillators investigated, the ratio of PMMA to BCF-12 provided the best correlation with LET values and was therefore used to construct the LET calibration curve. The expected LET values in the validation set were within 2% ± 6%, which resulted in dose accuracy of 1.5% ± 5.8% for the range of LET values investigated in this work.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the feasibility of using the ratio of the light outputs of two organic scintillators to simultaneously measure LET and dose in therapeutic proton beams for fluence-averaged LET values from 0.47 to 1.26 keV/μm. Further studies are needed to verify the response for higher LET values and the reproducibility of this method.