TN-USMA Net: Triple normalization-based gastrointestinal stromal tumors classification on multicenter EUS images with ultrasound-specific pretraining and meta attention

Performance of radiomics in preoperative determination of malignant potential and Ki-67 expression levels in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Empirical evidence for radiomics predicting the malignant potential and Ki-67 expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is lacking. The aim of this review article was to explore the preoperative discriminative performance of radiomics in assessing the malignant potential, mitotic index, and Ki-67 expression levels of GISTs. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The search was conducted up to 30 September 2023. Quality assessment was performed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). A total of 35 original studies were included in the analysis. Among them, 26 studies focused on determining malignant potential, three studies on mitotic index discrimination, and six studies on Ki-67 discrimination. In the validation set, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of radiomics in the determination of high malignant potential were 0.74 (95% CI=0.69-0.78), 0.90 (95% CI=0.83-0.94), and 0.81 (95% CI=0.14-0.99), respectively. For moderately to highly malignant potential, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.86 (95% CI=0.83-0.88), 0.73 (95% CI=0.67-0.78), and 0.88 (95% CI=0.27-0.99), respectively. Regarding the determination of high mitotic index, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of radiomics were 0.86 (95% CI=0.83-0.88), 0.73 (95% CI=0.67-0.78), and 0.88 (95% CI=0.27-0.99), respectively. When determining high Ki-67 expression, the combined sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.74 (95% CI=0.65-0.81), 0.81 (95% CI=0.74-0.86), and 0.84 (95% CI=0.61-0.95), respectively. Radiomics demonstrates promising discriminative performance in the preoperative assessment of malignant potential, mitotic index, and Ki-67 expression levels in GISTs.

Can incorporating image resolution into neural networks improve kidney tumor classification performance in ultrasound images?

Deep learning has been widely used in ultrasound image analysis, and it also benefits kidney ultrasound interpretation and diagnosis. However, the importance of ultrasound image resolution often goes overlooked within deep learning methodologies. In this study, we integrate the ultrasound image resolution into a convolutional neural network and explore the effect of the resolution on diagnosis of kidney tumors. In the process of integrating the image resolution information, we propose two different approaches to narrow the semantic gap between the features extracted by the neural network and the resolution features. In the first approach, the resolution is directly concatenated with the features extracted by the neural network. In the second approach, the features extracted by the neural network are first dimensionally reduced and then combined with the resolution features to form new composite features. We compare these two approaches incorporating the resolution with the method without incorporating the resolution on a kidney tumor dataset of 926 images consisting of 211 images of benign kidney tumors and 715 images of malignant kidney tumors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the method without incorporating the resolution is 0.8665, and the AUCs of the two approaches incorporating the resolution are 0.8926 (P < 0.0001) and 0.9135 (P < 0.0001) respectively. This study has established end-to-end kidney tumor classification systems and has demonstrated the benefits of integrating image resolution, showing that incorporating image resolution into neural networks can more accurately distinguish between malignant and benign kidney tumors in ultrasound images.

All you need is data preparation: A systematic review of image harmonization techniques in Multi-center/device studies for medical support systems

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Artificial intelligence (AI) models trained on multi-centric and multi-device studies can provide more robust insights and research findings compared to single-center studies. However, variability in acquisition protocols and equipment can introduce inconsistencies that hamper the effective pooling of multi-source datasets. This systematic review evaluates strategies for image harmonization, which standardizes appearances to enable reliable AI analysis of multi-source medical imaging.

METHODS

A literature search using PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify relevant papers published between 2013 and 2023 analyzing multi-centric and multi-device medical imaging studies that utilized image harmonization approaches.

RESULTS

Common image harmonization techniques included grayscale normalization (improving classification accuracy by up to 24.42 %), resampling (increasing the percentage of robust radiomics features from 59.5 % to 89.25 %), and color normalization (enhancing AUC by up to 0.25 in external test sets). Initially, mathematical and statistical methods dominated, but machine and deep learning adoption has risen recently. Color imaging modalities like digital pathology and dermatology have remained prominent application areas, though harmonization efforts have expanded to diverse fields including radiology, nuclear medicine, and ultrasound imaging. In all the modalities covered by this review, image harmonization improved AI performance, with increasing of up to 24.42 % in classification accuracy and 47 % in segmentation Dice scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Continued progress in image harmonization represents a promising strategy for advancing healthcare by enabling large-scale, reliable analysis of integrated multi-source datasets using AI. Standardizing imaging data across clinical settings can help realize personalized, evidence-based care supported by data-driven technologies while mitigating biases associated with specific populations or acquisition protocols.

Self-supervised learning for medical image classification: a systematic review and implementation guidelines

Advancements in deep learning and computer vision provide promising solutions for medical image analysis, potentially improving healthcare and patient outcomes. However, the prevailing paradigm of training deep learning models requires large quantities of labeled training data, which is both time-consuming and cost-prohibitive to curate for medical images. Self-supervised learning has the potential to make significant contributions to the development of robust medical imaging models through its ability to learn useful insights from copious medical datasets without labels. In this review, we provide consistent descriptions of different self-supervised learning strategies and compose a systematic review of papers published between 2012 and 2022 on PubMed, Scopus, and ArXiv that applied self-supervised learning to medical imaging classification. We screened a total of 412 relevant studies and included 79 papers for data extraction and analysis. With this comprehensive effort, we synthesize the collective knowledge of prior work and provide implementation guidelines for future researchers interested in applying self-supervised learning to their development of medical imaging classification models.

Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is useful for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but is limited by subjective interpretation. Studies on artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis are under development. Here, we used a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI in the diagnosis of GISTs using EUS images.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies based on the EUS using AI for the diagnosis of GISTs, and a meta-analysis was performed to examine the accuracy.

RESULTS

Overall, 7 studies were included in our meta-analysis. A total of 2431 patients containing more than 36,186 images were used as the overall dataset, of which 480 patients were used for the final testing. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratio (LR) of AI-assisted EUS for differentiating GISTs from other submucosal tumors (SMTs) were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.95), 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.87), 4.55 (95% CI 2.64-7.84), and 0.12 (95% CI 0.07-0.20), respectively. The summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the curve were 64.70 (95% CI 23.83-175.69) and 0.950 (Q* = 0.891).

CONCLUSIONS

AI-assisted EUS showed high accuracy for the automatic endoscopic diagnosis of GISTs, which could be used as a valuable complementary method for the differentiation of SMTs in the future.

Malignancy risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors evaluated with noninvasive radiomics: A multi-center study

Purpose

This study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models based on the enhanced CT images in differentiating the malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in comparison with the clinical indicators model and traditional CT diagnostic criteria.

Materials and methods

A total of 342 patients with GISTs confirmed histopathologically were enrolled from five medical centers. Data of patients wrom two centers comprised the training group (n=196), and data from the remaining three centers constituted the validation group (n=146). After CT image segmentation and feature extraction and selection, the arterial phase model and venous phase model were established. The maximum diameter of the tumor and internal necrosis were used to establish a clinical indicators model. The traditional CT diagnostic criteria were established for the classification of malignant potential of tumor. The performance of the four models was assessed using the receiver operating characteristics curve.

Reuslts

In the training group, the area under the curves(AUCs) of the arterial phase model, venous phase model, clinical indicators model, and traditional CT diagnostic criteria were 0.930 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.895-0.965), 0.933 (95%CI 0.898-0.967), 0.917 (95%CI 0.872-0.961) and 0.782 (95%CI 0.717-0.848), respectively. In the validation group, the AUCs of the models were 0.960 (95%CI 0.930-0.990), 0.961 (95% CI 0.930-0.992), 0.922 (95%CI 0.884-0.960) and 0.768 (95%CI 0.692-0.844), respectively. No significant difference was detected in the AUC between the arterial phase model, venous phase model, and clinical indicators model by the DeLong test, whereas a significant difference was observed between the traditional CT diagnostic criteria and the other three models.

Conclusion

The radiomics model using the morphological features of GISTs play a significant role in tumor risk stratification and can provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment plan.

Application and prospect of artificial intelligence in digestive endoscopy

INTRODUCTION

With the progress of science and technology, artificial intelligence represented by deep learning has gradually begun to be applied in the medical field. Artificial intelligence has been applied to benign gastrointestinal lesions, tumors, early cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, gallbladder, pancreas, and other diseases. This review summarizes the latest research results on artificial intelligence in digestive endoscopy and discusses the prospect of artificial intelligence in digestive system diseases.

AREAS COVERED

We retrieved relevant documents on artificial intelligence in digestive tract diseases from PubMed and Medline. This review elaborates on the knowledge of computer-aided diagnosis in digestive endoscopy.

EXPERT OPINION

Artificial intelligence significantly improves diagnostic accuracy, reduces physicians' workload, and provides a shred of evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Shortly, artificial intelligence will have high application value in the field of medicine.