Slot-scan dual-energy bone densitometry using motorized X-ray systems

Feasibility of bone marrow edema detection using dual-energy cone-beam computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Dual-energy (DE) detection of bone marrow edema (BME) would be a valuable new diagnostic capability for the emerging orthopedic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems. However, this imaging task is inherently challenging because of the narrow energy separation between water (edematous fluid) and fat (health yellow marrow), requiring precise artifact correction and dedicated material decomposition approaches.

PURPOSE

We investigate the feasibility of BME assessment using kV-switching DE CBCT with a comprehensive CBCT artifact correction framework and a two-stage projection- and image-domain three-material decomposition algorithm.

METHODS

DE CBCT projections of quantitative BME phantoms (water containers 100-165 mm in size with inserts presenting various degrees of edema) and an animal cadaver model of BME were acquired on a CBCT test bench emulating the standard wrist imaging configuration of a Multitom Rax twin robotic x-ray system. The slow kV-switching scan protocol involved a 60 kV low energy (LE) beam and a 120 kV high energy (HE) beam switched every 0.5° over a 200° angular span. The DE CBCT data preprocessing and artifact correction framework consisted of (i) projection interpolation onto matched LE and HE projections views, (ii) lag and glare deconvolutions, and (iii) efficient Monte Carlo (MC)-based scatter correction. Virtual non-calcium (VNCa) images for BME detection were then generated by projection-domain decomposition into an Aluminium (Al) and polyethylene basis set (to remove beam hardening) followed by three-material image-domain decomposition into water, Ca, and fat. Feasibility of BME detection was quantified in terms of VNCa image contrast and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Robustness to object size, position in the field of view (FOV) and beam collimation (varied 20-160 mm) was investigated.

RESULTS

The MC-based scatter correction delivered > 69% reduction of cupping artifacts for moderate to wide collimations (> 80 mm beam width), which was essential to achieve accurate DE material decomposition. In a forearm-sized object, a 20% increase in water concentration (edema) of a trabecular bone-mimicking mixture presented as ∼15 HU VNCa contrast using 80-160 mm beam collimations. The variability with respect to object position in the FOV was modest (< 15% coefficient of variation). The areas under the ROC curve were > 0.9. A femur-sized object presented a somewhat more challenging task, resulting in increased sensitivity to object positioning at 160 mm collimation. In animal cadaver specimens, areas of VNCa enhancement consistent with BME were observed in DE CBCT images in regions of MRI-confirmed edema.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the proposed artifact correction and material decomposition pipeline can overcome the challenges of scatter and limited spectral separation to achieve relatively accurate and sensitive BME detection in DE CBCT. This study provides an important baseline for clinical translation of musculoskeletal DE CBCT to quantitative, point-of-care bone health assessment.

Accuracy of radiostereometric analysis using a motorized Roentgen system in a pilot study for clinical simulation

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is routinely implemented with two paired Roentgen tubes for three-dimensional (3D) implant migration measurements. A conventional set-up of one stationary tube and one mobile could be time-consuming. Utilizing two customized ceiling-mounted tubes is normally associated with investment costs. Thus, a pilot set-up of a motorized system (single Roentgen source) for radiostereometric image acquisition may be a time-saving and space-efficient alternative. RSA using the motorized system is feasible in this study as a non-synchronized image acquisition technique, however, patient motion may occur and influence the assessment of implant migration. The phantom study aimed to assess accuracy of RSA using the motorized Roentgen system in this in vitro study. Accuracy values of translations and rotations were ±0.29 mm and ±0.48° for the single Roentgen source RSA set-up and ±0.26 mm and ±0.48° for the conventional RSA set-up. This study was also performed to simulate potential patient motion during exposure intervals between paired image acquisition. RSA using the motorized system is able to implement RSA with acceptable accuracy. In general, RSA with synchronized image acquisition is the gold standard to access in vivo implant migration with the highest accuracy. Patient motion exists in non-synchronized image acquisition techniques and results in RSA-related motion artifacts. Then we introduced what RSA-related motion artifacts are. The uniplanar calibration cage applied in the study has a few fiducial and control markers, and some of the markers were occluded in radiographs. Whereas, the number of markers in the calibration cage is correlated with accuracy of 3D implant reconstruction.