Multi-sequence MR generated sCT is promising for HNC MR-only RT: a comprehensive evaluation of previously developed sCT generation networks

Synthetic CT generation based on multi-sequence MR using CycleGAN for head and neck MRI-only planning

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of different magnetic resonance (MR) sequences on the accuracy of generating computed tomography (sCT) images for nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on CycleGAN. In this study, 143 patients' head and neck MR sequence (T1, T2, T1C, and T1DIXONC) and CT imaging data were acquired. The generator and discriminator of CycleGAN are improved to achieve the purpose of balance confrontation, and a cyclic consistent structure control domain is proposed in terms of loss function. Four different single-sequence MR images and one multi-sequence MR image were used to evaluate the accuracy of sCT. During the model testing phase, five testing scenarios were employed to further assess the mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, structural similarity index, and root mean square error between the actual CT images and the sCT images generated by different models. T1 sequence-based sCT achieved better results in single-sequence MR-based sCT. Multi-sequence MR-based sCT achieved better results with T1 sequence-based sCT in terms of evaluation metrics. For metrological evaluation, the global gamma passage rate of sCT based on sequence MR was greater than 95% at 3%/3 mm, except for sCT based on T2 sequence MR. We developed a CycleGAN method to synthesize CT using different MR sequences, this method shows encouraging potential for dosimetric evaluation.

HaN-Seg: The head and neck organ-at-risk CT and MR segmentation challenge

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To promote the development of auto-segmentation methods for head and neck (HaN) radiation treatment (RT) planning that exploit the information of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging modalities, we organized HaN-Seg: The Head and Neck Organ-at-Risk CT and MR Segmentation Challenge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The challenge task was to automatically segment 30 organs-at-risk (OARs) of the HaN region in 14 withheld test cases given the availability of 42 publicly available training cases. Each case consisted of one contrast-enhanced CT and one T1-weighted MR image of the HaN region of the same patient, with up to 30 corresponding reference OAR delineation masks. The performance was evaluated in terms of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and statistical ranking was applied for each metric by pairwise comparison of the submitted methods using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

While 23 teams registered for the challenge, only seven submitted their methods for the final phase. The top-performing team achieved a DSC of 76.9 % and a HD95 of 3.5 mm. All participating teams utilized architectures based on U-Net, with the winning team leveraging rigid MR to CT registration combined with network entry-level concatenation of both modalities.

CONCLUSION

This challenge simulated a real-world clinical scenario by providing non-registered MR and CT images with varying fields-of-view and voxel sizes. Remarkably, the top-performing teams achieved segmentation performance surpassing the inter-observer agreement on the same dataset. These results set a benchmark for future research on this publicly available dataset and on paired multi-modal image segmentation in general.

Challenges and opportunities in the development and clinical implementation of artificial intelligence based synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance only radiotherapy

Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can serve as a substitute for planning CT in radiation therapy (RT), thereby removing registration uncertainties associated with multi-modality imaging pairing, reducing costs and patient radiation exposure. CE/FDA-approved sCT solutions are nowadays available for pelvis, brain, and head and neck, while more complex deep learning (DL) algorithms are under investigation for other anatomic sites. The main challenge in achieving a widespread clinical implementation of sCT lies in the absence of consensus on sCT commissioning and quality assurance (QA), resulting in variation of sCT approaches across different hospitals. To address this issue, a group of experts gathered at the ESTRO Physics Workshop 2022 to discuss the integration of sCT solutions into clinics and report the process and its outcomes. This position paper focuses on aspects of sCT development and commissioning, outlining key elements crucial for the safe implementation of an MRI-only RT workflow.

vOARiability: Interobserver and intermodality variability analysis in OAR contouring from head and neck CT and MR images

BACKGROUND

Accurate and consistent contouring of organs-at-risk (OARs) from medical images is a key step of radiotherapy (RT) cancer treatment planning. Most contouring approaches rely on computed tomography (CT) images, but the integration of complementary magnetic resonance (MR) modality is highly recommended, especially from the perspective of OAR contouring, synthetic CT and MR image generation for MR-only RT, and MR-guided RT. Although MR has been recognized as valuable for contouring OARs in the head and neck (HaN) region, the accuracy and consistency of the resulting contours have not been yet objectively evaluated.

PURPOSE

To analyze the interobserver and intermodality variability in contouring OARs in the HaN region, performed by observers with different level of experience from CT and MR images of the same patients.

METHODS

In the final cohort of 27 CT and MR images of the same patients, contours of up to 31 OARs were obtained by a radiation oncology resident (junior observer, JO) and a board-certified radiation oncologist (senior observer, SO). The resulting contours were then evaluated in terms of interobserver variability, characterized as the agreement among different observers (JO and SO) when contouring OARs in a selected modality (CT or MR), and intermodality variability, characterized as the agreement among different modalities (CT and MR) when OARs were contoured by a selected observer (JO or SO), both by the Dice coefficient (DC) and 95-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95 $_{95}$ ).

RESULTS

The mean (±standard deviation) interobserver variability was 69.0 ± 20.2% and 5.1 ± 4.1 mm, while the mean intermodality variability was 61.6 ± 19.0% and 6.1 ± 4.3 mm in terms of DC and HD95 $_{95}$ , respectively, across all OARs. Statistically significant differences were only found for specific OARs. The performed MR to CT image registration resulted in a mean target registration error of 1.7 ± 0.5 mm, which was considered as valid for the analysis of intermodality variability.

CONCLUSIONS

The contouring variability was, in general, similar for both image modalities, and experience did not considerably affect the contouring performance. However, the results indicate that an OAR is difficult to contour regardless of whether it is contoured in the CT or MR image, and that observer experience may be an important factor for OARs that are deemed difficult to contour. Several of the differences in the resulting variability can be also attributed to adherence to guidelines, especially for OARs with poor visibility or without distinctive boundaries in either CT or MR images. Although considerable contouring differences were observed for specific OARs, it can be concluded that almost all OARs can be contoured with a similar degree of variability in either the CT or MR modality, which works in favor of MR images from the perspective of MR-only and MR-guided RT.

HaN-Seg: The head and neck organ-at-risk CT and MR segmentation dataset

PURPOSE

For the cancer in the head and neck (HaN), radiotherapy (RT) represents an important treatment modality. Segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) is the starting point of RT planning, however, existing approaches are focused on either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images, while multimodal segmentation has not been thoroughly explored yet. We present a dataset of CT and MR images of the same patients with curated reference HaN OAR segmentations for an objective evaluation of segmentation methods.

ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS

The cohort consists of HaN images of 56 patients that underwent both CT and T1-weighted MR imaging for image-guided RT. For each patient, reference segmentations of up to 30 OARs were obtained by experts performing manual pixel-wise image annotation. By maintaining the distribution of patient age and gender, and annotation type, the patients were randomly split into training Set 1 (42 cases or 75%) and test Set 2 (14 cases or 25%). Baseline auto-segmentation results are also provided by training the publicly available deep nnU-Net architecture on Set 1, and evaluating its performance on Set 2.

DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES

The data are publicly available through an open-access repository under the name HaN-Seg: The Head and Neck Organ-at-Risk CT & MR Segmentation Dataset. Images and reference segmentations are stored in the NRRD file format, where the OAR filenames correspond to the nomenclature recommended by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, and OAR and demographics information is stored in separate comma-separated value  files.

POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS

The HaN-Seg: The Head and Neck Organ-at-Risk CT & MR Segmentation Challenge is launched in parallel with the dataset release to promote the development of automated techniques for OAR segmentation in the HaN. Other potential applications include out-of-challenge algorithm development and benchmarking, as well as external validation of the developed algorithms.