A quantitative comparison between a navigated Cartesian and a self-navigated radial protocol from clinical studies for free-breathing 3D whole-heart bSSFP coronary MRA

Inversion recovery and saturation recovery pulmonary vein MR angiography using an image based navigator fluoro trigger and variable-density 3D cartesian sampling with spiral-like order

Contrast enhanced pulmonary vein magnetic resonance angiography (PV CE-MRA) has value in atrial ablation pre-procedural planning. We aimed to provide high fidelity, ECG gated PV CE-MRA accelerated by variable density Cartesian sampling (VD-CASPR) with image navigator (iNAV) respiratory motion correction acquired in under 4 min. We describe its use in part during the global iodinated contrast shortage. VD-CASPR/iNAV framework was applied to ECG-gated inversion and saturation recovery gradient recalled echo PV CE-MRA in 65 patients (66 exams) using .15 mmol/kg Gadobutrol. Image quality was assessed by three physicians, and anatomical segmentation quality by two technologists. Left atrial SNR and left atrial/myocardial CNR were measured. 12 patients had CTA within 6 months of MRA. Two readers assessed PV ostial measurements versus CTA for intermodality/interobserver agreement. Inter-rater/intermodality reliability, reproducibility of ostial measurements, SNR/CNR, image, and anatomical segmentation quality was compared. The mean acquisition time was 3.58 ± 0.60 min. Of 35 PV pre-ablation datasets (34 patients), mean anatomical segmentation quality score was 3.66 ± 0.54 and 3.63 ± 0.55 as rated by technologists 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.7113). Good/excellent anatomical segmentation quality (grade 3/4) was seen in 97% of exams. Each rated one exam as moderate quality (grade 2). 95% received a majority image quality score of good/excellent by three physicians. Ostial PV measurements correlated moderate to excellently with CTA (ICCs range 0.52-0.86). No difference in SNR was observed between IR and SR. High quality PV CE-MRA is possible in under 4 min using iNAV bolus timing/motion correction and VD-CASPR.

Self-navigated coronary MR angiography for coronary aneurysm detection in Kawasaki disease at 3T: comparison with conventional diaphragm-navigated coronary MR angiography

OBJECTIVES

To assess the scan time, image quality, and diagnostic performance of self-navigated coronary MR angiography (SN-CMRA) for coronary aneurysm (CAA) detection in Kawasaki disease (KD) patients and compare it with diaphragm-navigated CMRA (DN-CMRA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SN-CMRA and DN-CMRA were performed on 76 pediatric patients with KD (48 males, 6.75 ± 3.59 years). Thirty-three of whom underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA)/invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The scan time and qualitative and quantitative image quality assessment were compared between the two sequences. The diagnostic performance for CAA detection by the two approaches using CCTA/ICA as the reference standard was compared on per-patient, per-vessel, and per-segment basis.

RESULTS

The scan time of SN-CMRA was significantly shorter than that of DN-CMRA (7.49 ± 2.31 min vs. 10.03 ± 4.47 min, p < 0.001). There was no difference in overall and segmental image quality to reach the clinical diagnostic criteria between the two sequences (all p > 0.05). No significant difference in vessel length of the three main coronary arteries was found between the two approaches (all p > 0.05). Moreover, SN-CMRA showed no difference from DN-CMRA in contrast ratio of blood-myocardium (1.25 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.06 to 1.51) vs. 1.18 (IQR, 0.95 to 1.64), p = 0.706). There was no difference in the diagnostic accuracy of SN-CMRA and DN-CMRA for CAA detection on per-patient, per-vessel, or per-segment basis (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SN-CMRA at 3T showed reliable diagnostic performance and application value for CAA detection in children with KD. Compared with DN-CMRA, SN-CMRA can simplify the scanning procedure and shorten the scan time, achieving comparable image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Coronary aneurysm in children with Kawasaki disease (KD) can be detected by self-navigated coronary MR angiography (CMRA) non-invasively and without radiation, achieving comparable image quality and diagnostic performance as diaphragm-navigated CMRA while shortening scanning time. It can provide reference for risk stratification and treatment management of KD.

KEY POINTS

• Evaluating the size of coronary aneurysm is important for risk stratification and treatment of Kawasaki disease. • Self-navigated coronary MR angiography (SN-CMRA) shortens scan time and achieves comparable image quality and diagnostic performance compared with diaphragm-navigated coronary MR angiography. • SN-CMRA can evaluate coronary aneurysm non-invasively and without radiation, providing information for risk stratification and treatment.

Feasibility of accelerated non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart bSSFP coronary MR angiography by deep learning-constrained compressed sensing

OBJECTIVES

To examine a compressed sensing artificial intelligence (CSAI) framework to accelerate image acquisition in non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart bSSFP coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.

METHODS

Thirty healthy volunteers and 20 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) scheduled for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) were enrolled. Non-contrast-enhanced coronary MR angiography was performed with CSAI, compressed sensing (CS), and sensitivity encoding (SENSE) methods in healthy participants and with CSAI in patients. Acquisition time, subjective image quality score, and objective image quality measurement (blood pool homogeneity, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were compared among the three protocols. The diagnostic performance of CASI coronary MR angiography for predicting significant stenosis (≥ 50% diameter stenosis) on CCTA was evaluated. The Friedman test was performed to compare the three protocols.

RESULTS

Acquisition time was significantly shorter in the CSAI and CS groups than in the SENSE group (10.2 ± 3.2 min vs. 10.9 ± 2.9 min vs. 13.0 ± 4.1 min, p < 0.001). However, the CSAI approach had the highest image quality scores, blood pool homogeneity, mean SNR value, and mean CNR value (all p < 0.001) compared with the CS and SENSE approaches. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CSAI coronary MR angiography per patient were 87.5% (7/8), 91.7% (11/12), and 90.0% (18/20); those per vessel were 81.8% (9/11), 93.9% (46/49), and 91.7% (55/60); and those per segment were 84.6% (11/13), 98.0% (244/249), and 97.3% (255/262), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CSAI yielded superior image quality within a clinically feasible acquisition time in healthy participants and patients with suspected CAD.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The non-invasive and radiation-free CSAI framework could be a promising tool for rapid screening and comprehensive examination of the coronary vasculature in patients with suspected CAD.

KEY POINTS

• This prospective study showed that CSAI enables a reduction in acquisition time by 22% with superior diagnostic image quality compared with the SENSE protocol. • CSAI replaces the wavelet transform with a CNN as a sparsifying transform in the CS algorithm, achieving high coronary MR image quality with reduced noise. • CSAI achieved per-patient sensitivity of 87.5% (7/8) and specificity of 91.7% (11/12) respectively for detecting significant coronary stenosis.

Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Techniques, Principles, and Applications

Several non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques have been developed, providing an attractive alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA and a radiation-free alternative to computed tomography (CT) CT angiography. This review describes the physical principles, limitations, and clinical applications of bright-blood (BB) non-contrast MRA techniques. The principles of BB MRA techniques can be broadly divided into (a) flow-independent MRA, (b) blood-inflow-based MRA, (c) cardiac phase dependent, flow-based MRA, (d) velocity sensitive MRA, and (e) arterial spin-labeling MRA. The review also includes emerging multi-contrast MRA techniques that provide simultaneous BB and black-blood images for combined luminal and vessel wall evaluation.

Efficient non-contrast enhanced 3D Cartesian cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic aorta in 3 min

BACKGROUND

The application of cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) for the assessment of thoracic aortic disease is often associated with prolonged and unpredictable acquisition times and residual motion artefacts. To overcome these limitations, we have integrated undersampled acquisition with image-based navigators and inline non-rigid motion correction to enable a free-breathing, contrast-free Cartesian CMRA framework for the visualization of the thoracic aorta in a short and predictable scan of 3 min.

METHODS

35 patients with thoracic aortic disease (36 ± 13y, 14 female) were prospectively enrolled in this single-center study. The proposed 3D T2-prepared balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) sequence with image-based navigator (iNAV) was compared to the clinical 3D T2-prepared bSSFP with diaphragmatic-navigator gating (dNAV), in terms of image acquisition time. Three cardiologists blinded to iNAV vs. dNAV acquisition, recorded image quality scores across four aortic segments and their overall diagnostic confidence. Contrast ratio (CR) and relative standard deviation (RSD) of signal intensity (SI) in the corresponding segments were estimated. Co-axial aortic dimensions in six landmarks were measured by two readers to evaluate the agreement between the two methods, along with inter-observer and intra-observer agreement. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U (MWU), Bland-Altman analysis (BAA), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The scan time for the iNAV-based approach was significantly shorter (3.1 ± 0.5 min vs. 12.0 ± 3.0 min for dNAV, P = 0.005). Reconstruction was performed inline in 3.0 ± 0.3 min. Diagnostic confidence was similar for the proposed iNAV versus dNAV for all three reviewers (Reviewer 1: 3.9 ± 0.3 vs. 3.8 ± 0.4, P = 0.7; Reviewer 2: 4.0 ± 0.2 vs. 3.9 ± 0.3, P = 0.4; Reviewer 3: 3.8 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.3). The proposed method yielded higher image quality scores in terms of artefacts from respiratory motion, and non-diagnostic images due to signal inhomogeneity were observed less frequently. While the dNAV approach outperformed the iNAV method in the CR assessment, the iNAV sequence showed improved signal homogeneity along the entire thoracic aorta [RSD SI 5.1 (4.4, 6.5) vs. 6.5 (4.6, 8.6), P = 0.002]. BAA showed a mean difference of < 0.05 cm across the 6 landmarks between the two datasets. ICC showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic aortic iNAV-based CMRA with fast acquisition (~ 3 min) and inline reconstruction (3 min) is proposed, resulting in high diagnostic confidence and reproducible aortic measurements.

Self-supervised learning-based diffeomorphic non-rigid motion estimation for fast motion-compensated coronary MR angiography

PURPOSE

To accelerate non-rigid motion corrected coronary MR angiography (CMRA) reconstruction by developing a deep learning based non-rigid motion estimation network and combining this with an efficient implementation of the undersampled motion corrected reconstruction.

METHODS

Undersampled and respiratory motion corrected CMRA with overall short scans of 5 to 10 min have been recently proposed. However, image reconstruction with this approach remains lengthy, since it relies on several non-rigid image registrations to estimate the respiratory motion and on a subsequent iterative optimization to correct for motion during the undersampled reconstruction. Here we introduce a self-supervised diffeomorphic non-rigid respiratory motion estimation network, DiRespME-net, to speed up respiratory motion estimation. We couple this with an efficient GPU-based implementation of the subsequent motion-corrected iterative reconstruction. DiRespME-net is based on a U-Net architecture, and is trained in a self-supervised fashion, with a loss enforcing image similarity and spatial smoothness of the motion fields. Motion predicted by DiRespME-net was used for GPU-based motion-corrected CMRA in 12 test subjects and final images were compared to those produced by state-of-the-art reconstruction. Vessel sharpness and visible length of the right coronary artery (RCA) and the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery were used as metrics of image quality for comparison.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in image quality was found between images reconstructed with the proposed approach (MC:DiRespME-net) and a motion-corrected reconstruction using cubic B-splines (MC:Nifty-reg). Visible vessel length was not significantly different between methods (RCA: MC:Nifty-reg 5.7 ± 1.7 cm vs MC:DiRespME-net 5.8 ± 1.7 cm, P = 0.32; LAD: MC:Nifty-reg 7.0 ± 2.6 cm vs MC:DiRespME-net 6.9 ± 2.7 cm, P = 0.81). Similarly, no statistically significant difference between methods was observed in terms of vessel sharpness (RCA: MC:Nifty-reg 60.3 ± 7.2% vs MC:DiRespME-net 61.0 ± 6.8%, P = 0.19; LAD: MC:Nifty-reg 57.4 ± 7.9% vs MC:DiRespME-net 58.1 ± 7.5%, P = 0.27). The proposed approach achieved a 50-fold reduction in computation time, resulting in a total reconstruction time of approximately 20 s.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed self-supervised learning-based motion corrected reconstruction enables fast motion-corrected CMRA image reconstruction, holding promise for integration in clinical routine.

Accelerated free-breathing 3D whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography with a radial phyllotaxis trajectory, compressed sensing, and curvelet transform

PURPOSE

To develop and validate an accelerated free-breathing 3D whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) technique using a radial k-space trajectory with compressed sensing and curvelet transform.

METHOD

A 3D radial phyllotaxis trajectory was implemented to traverse the centerline of k-space immediately before the segmented whole-heart MRA data acquisition at each cardiac cycle. The k-space centerlines were used to correct the respiratory-induced heart motion in the acquired MRA data. The corrected MRA data were then reconstructed by a novel compressed sensing algorithm using curvelets as the sparsifying domain. The proposed 3D whole-heart MRA technique (radial CS curvelet) was then prospectively validated against compressed sensing with a conventional wavelet transform (radial CS wavelet) and a standard Cartesian acquisition in terms of scan time and border sharpness.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (females 10, median age 34-year-old) underwent 3D whole-heart MRA imaging using a standard Cartesian trajectory and our proposed radial phyllotaxis trajectory. Scan time for radial phyllotaxis was significantly shorter than Cartesian (4.88 ± 0.86 min. vs. 6.84 ± 1.79 min., P-value = 0.004). Radial CS curvelet border sharpness was slightly lower than Cartesian and, for the majority of vessels, was significantly better than radial CS wavelet (P-value < 0.050).

CONCLUSION

The proposed technique of 3D whole-heart MRA acquisition with a radial CS curvelet has a shorter scan time and slightly lower vessel sharpness compared to the Cartesian acquisition with radial profile ordering, and has slightly better sharpness than radial CS wavelet. Future work on this technique includes additional clinical trials and extending this technique to 3D cine imaging.

2D cine vs. 3D self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance for aortic root measurements in congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the method of choice for evaluation of aortic root dilatation in congenital heart disease. Usually, a cross-sectional 2D cine stack is acquired perpendicular to the vessel's axis. However, this method requires a considerable patient collaboration and precise planning of image planes. The present study compares a recently introduced 3D self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution whole heart CMR sequence (3D self nav) allowing a multiplanar retrospective reconstruction of the aortic root as an alternative to the 2D cine technique for determination of aortic root diameters.

METHODS

A total of 6 cusp-commissure (CuCo) and cusp-cusp (CuCu) enddiastolic diameters were measured by two observers on 2D cine and 3D self nav cross-sectional planes of the aortic root acquired on a 1.5 T CMR scanner. Asymmetry of the aortic root was evaluated by the ratio of the minimal to the maximum 3D self nav CuCu diameter. CuCu diameters were compared to standard transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) aortic root diameters.

RESULTS

Sixty-five exams in 58 patients (32 ± 15 years) were included. Typically, 2D cine and 3D self nav spatial resolution was 1.1-1.52 × 4.5-7 mm and 0.9-1.153 mm, respectively. 3D self nav yielded larger maximum diameters than 2D cine: CuCo 37.2 ± 6.4 vs. 36.2 ± 7.0 mm (p = 0.006), CuCu 39.7 ± 6.3 vs. 38.5 ± 6.5 mm (p < 0.001). CuCu diameters were significantly larger (2.3-3.9 mm, p < 0.001) than CuCo and TTE diameters on both 2D cine and 3D self nav. Intra- and interobserver variabilities were excellent for both techniques with bias of -0.5 to 1.0 mm. Intra-observer variability of the more experienced observer was better for 3D self nav (F-test p < 0.05). Aortic root asymmetry was more pronounced in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV: 0.73 (interquartile (IQ) 0.69; 0.78) vs. 0.93 (IQ 0.9; 0.96), p < 0.001), which was associated to a larger difference of maximum CuCu to TTE diameters: 5.5 ± 3.3 vs. 3.3 ± 3.8 mm, p = 0.033.

CONCLUSION

Both, the 3D self nav and 2D cine CMR techniques allow reliable determination of aortic root diameters. However, we propose to privilege the 3D self nav technique and measurement of CuCu diameters to avoid underestimation of the maximum diameter, particularly in patients with asymmetric aortic roots and/or BAV.

Motion compensated whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using focused navigation (fNAV)

BACKGROUND

Radial self-navigated (RSN) whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CCMRA) is a free-breathing technique that estimates and corrects for respiratory motion. However, RSN has been limited to a 1D rigid correction which is often insufficient for patients with complex respiratory patterns. The goal of this work is therefore to improve the robustness and quality of 3D radial CCMRA by incorporating both 3D motion information and nonrigid intra-acquisition correction of the data into a framework called focused navigation (fNAV).

METHODS

We applied fNAV to 500 data sets from a numerical simulation, 22 healthy subjects, and 549 cardiac patients. In each of these cohorts we compared fNAV to RSN and respiratory resolved extradimensional golden-angle radial sparse parallel (XD-GRASP) reconstructions of the same data. Reconstruction times for each method were recorded. Motion estimate accuracy was measured as the correlation between fNAV and ground truth for simulations, and fNAV and image registration for in vivo data. Percent vessel sharpness was measured in all simulated data sets and healthy subjects, and a subset of patients. Finally, subjective image quality analysis was performed by a blinded expert reviewer who chose the best image for each in vivo data set and scored on a Likert scale 0-4 in a subset of patients by two reviewers in consensus.

RESULTS

The reconstruction time for fNAV images was significantly higher than RSN (6.1 ± 2.1 min vs 1.4 ± 0.3, min, p < 0.025) but significantly lower than XD-GRASP (25.6 ± 7.1, min, p < 0.025). Overall, there is high correlation between the fNAV and reference displacement estimates across all data sets (0.73 ± 0.29). For simulated data, healthy subjects, and patients, fNAV lead to significantly sharper coronary arteries than all other reconstruction methods (p < 0.01). Finally, in a blinded evaluation by an expert reviewer fNAV was chosen as the best image in 444 out of 571 data sets (78%; p < 0.001) and consensus grades of fNAV images (2.6 ± 0.6) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than uncorrected (1.7 ± 0.7), RSN (1.9 ± 0.6), and XD-GRASP (1.8 ± 0.8).

CONCLUSION

fNAV is a promising technique for improving the quality of RSN free-breathing 3D whole-heart CCMRA. This novel approach to respiratory self-navigation can derive 3D nonrigid motion estimations from an acquired 1D signal yielding statistically significant improvement in image sharpness relative to 1D translational correction as well as XD-GRASP reconstructions. Further study of the diagnostic impact of this technique is therefore warranted to evaluate its full clinical utility.

Measurement accuracy of prototype non-contrast, compressed sensing-based, respiratory motion-resolved whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic dilatation: comparison with computed tomography angiography

BACKGROUND

Patients with thoracic aortic dilatation who undergo annual computed tomography angiography (CTA) are subject to repeated radiation and contrast exposure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a non-contrast, respiratory motion-resolved whole-heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) technique against reference standard CTA, for the quantitative assessment of cardiovascular anatomy and monitoring of disease progression in patients with thoracic aortic dilatation.  METHODS: Twenty-four patients (68.6 ± 9.8 years) with thoracic aortic dilatation prospectively underwent clinical CTA and research 1.5T CMRA between July 2017 and November 2018. Scans were repeated in 15 patients 1 year later. A prototype free-breathing 3D radial balanced steady-state free-precession whole-heart CMRA sequence was used in combination with compressed sensing-based reconstruction. Area, circumference, and diameter measurements were obtained at seven aortic levels by two experienced and two inexperienced readers. In addition, area and diameter measurements of the cardiac chambers, pulmonary arteries and pulmonary veins were also obtained. Agreement between the two modalities was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots.

RESULTS

Area, circumference and diameter measurements on a per-level analysis showed good or excellent agreement between CTA and CMRA (ICCs > 0.84). Means of differences on Bland-Altman plots were: area 0.0 cm2 [- 1.7; 1.6]; circumference 1.0 mm [- 10.0; 12.0], and diameter 0.6 mm [- 2.6; 3.6]. Area and diameter measurements of the left cardiac chambers showed good agreement (ICCs > 0.80), while moderate to good agreement was observed for the right chambers (all ICCs > 0.56). Similar good to excellent inter-modality agreement was shown for the pulmonary arteries and veins (ICC range 0.79-0.93), with the exception of the left lower pulmonary vein (ICC < 0.51). Inter-reader assessment demonstrated mostly good or excellent agreement for both CTA and CMRA measurements on a per-level analysis (ICCs > 0.64). Difference in maximum aortic diameter measurements at baseline vs follow up showed excellent agreement between CMRA and CTA (ICC = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The radial whole-heart CMRA technique combined with respiratory motion-resolved reconstruction provides comparable anatomical measurements of the thoracic aorta and cardiac structures as the reference standard CTA. It could potentially be used to diagnose and monitor patients with thoracic aortic dilatation without exposing them to radiation or contrast media.

Self-navigated 3D whole-heart MRA for non-enhanced surveillance of thoracic aortic dilation: A comparison to CTA

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare image quality and reliability of a non-contrast, self-navigated 3D whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequence with contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) for sizing of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA).

METHODS

Self-navigated 3D whole-heart 1.5 T MRA was performed in 20 patients (aged 67 ± 9 years, 75% male) for sizing of TAA; a subgroup of 18 (90%) patients underwent additional contrast-enhanced CTA on the same day. Subjective image quality was scored according to a 4-point Likert scale and ratings between observers were compared by Cohen's Kappa statistics. For MRA, subjective motion blurring and signal inhomogeneity was rated according to a 3-point scale, respectively. Objective signal inhomogeneity of MRA was quantified as standard deviation of the voxel intensities in a circular region of interest (ROI) placed in the ascending aorta divided by their mean value. Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Overall subjective image quality as rated by two observers was 1 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-2] for self-navigated MRA and 1.5 [IQR 1-2] for CTA (p = 0.717). For MRA, perfect inter-observer agreement was found regarding presence of artefacts and subjective image sharpness (κ = 1). Subjective signal inhomogeneity agreed moderately between the observers (κ = 0.58, p = 0.007), however, it correlated strongly with objectively quantified inhomogeneity of the blood pool signal (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001). Maximum diameters of TAA as measured by self-navigated MRA and CTA showed very strong correlation (r = 0.99, p < 0.0001) without significant inter-method bias (bias -0.03 mm, lower and upper limit of agreement -0.74 and 0.68 mm, p = 0.749). Inter-observer correlation of aortic aneurysm as measured by MRA was very strong (r = 0.96) without significant bias (p = 0.695).

CONCLUSION

Self-navigated 3D whole-heart MRA enables reliable contrast- and radiation free aortic dilation surveillance without significant difference to standardized CTA while providing predictable acquisition time and offering excellent image quality.