1
|
Groot L, Latijnhouwers DAJM, Reijman M, Verdegaal SHM, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Gademan MGJ. Recovery and the use of postoperative physical therapy after total hip or knee replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:666. [PMID: 35831841 PMCID: PMC9277921 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05429-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Total hip or knee arthroplasties (THA/TKA) show favorable long-term effects, yet the recovery process may take weeks to months. Physical therapy (PT) following discharge from hospital is an effective intervention to enhance this recovery process. To investigate the relation between recovery and postoperative PT usage, including the presence of comorbidities, 6 months after THA/TKA. Methods Multicenter, observational study in primary THA/TKA patients who completed preoperative and 6 months postoperative assessments. The assessments included questions on PT use (yes/no and duration; long term use defined as ≥ 12 weeks), comorbidities (musculoskeletal, non-musculoskeletal, sensory comorbidities and frequency of comorbidities). Recovery was assessed with the HOOS/KOOS on all 5 subdomains. Logistic regression with long term PT as outcome was performed adjusted for confounding including an interaction term (comorbidity*HOOS/KOOS-subdomain). Results In total, 1289 THA and 1333 TKA patients were included, of whom 95% received postoperative PT, 56% and 67% received postoperative PT ≥ 12 weeks respectively. In both THA and TKA group, less improvement on all HOOS/KOOS domain scores was associated with ≥ 12 weeks of postoperative PT (range Odds Ratios 0.97–0.99). In the THA group the impact of recovery was smaller in patient with comorbidities as non- musculoskeletal comorbidities modified all associations between recovery and postoperative PT duration (Odds Ratios range 1.01–1.05). Musculoskeletal comorbidities modified the associations between Function-in-Daily-Living-and Sport-and-recreation recovery and postoperative PT. Sensory comorbidities only had an effect on Sport-and-recreation recovery and postoperative PT. Also the frequency of comorbidities modified the relation between Function-in-Daily-Living, pain and symptoms recovery and postoperative PT. In the TKA group comorbidity did not modify the associations. Conclusion Worse recovery was associated with longer duration of postoperative PT suggesting that PT provision is in line with patients’ needs. The impact of physical recovery on the use of long-term postoperative PT was smaller in THA patients with comorbidities. Trial registration Registered in the Dutch Trial Registry on March 13, 2012. TRIAL ID NTR3348; registration number: P12.047. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/3197. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05429-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Groot
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - D A J M Latijnhouwers
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M Reijman
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S H M Verdegaal
- Department of Orthopedics, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden and Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
| | - T P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M G J Gademan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. .,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bouma SE, van Beek JFE, Diercks RL, van der Woude LHV, Stevens M, van den Akker-Scheek I. Barriers and facilitators perceived by healthcare professionals for implementing lifestyle interventions in patients with osteoarthritis: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056831. [PMID: 35105598 PMCID: PMC8808449 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of barriers and facilitators that healthcare professionals (HCPs) perceive regarding the implementation of lifestyle interventions (LIs) in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN Scoping review. DATA SOURCES The databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to January 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Primary research articles with a quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods design were eligible for inclusion if they reported: (1) perceptions of primary and/or secondary HCPs (population); (2) on implementing LIs with physical activity and/or weight management as key components (concept) and (3) on conservative management of hip and/or knee OA (context). Articles not published in English, German or Dutch were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Barriers and facilitators were extracted by two researchers independently. Subsequently, the extracted factors were linked to a framework based on the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases checklist. RESULTS Thirty-six articles were included. In total, 809 factors were extracted and subdivided into nine domains. The extracted barriers were mostly related to non-optimal interdisciplinary collaboration, patients' negative attitude towards LIs, patients' low health literacy and HCPs' lack of knowledge and skills around LIs or promoting behavioural change. The extracted facilitators were mostly related to good interdisciplinary collaboration, a positive perception of HCPs' own role in implementing LIs, the content or structure of LIs and HCPs' positive attitude towards LIs. CONCLUSIONS Multiple individual and environmental factors influence the implementation of LIs by HCPs in patients with hip and/or knee OA. The resulting overview of barriers and facilitators can guide future research on the implementation of LIs within OA care. To investigate whether factor frequency is related to the relevance of each domain, further research should assess the relative importance of the identified factors involving all relevant disciplines of primary and secondary HCPs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019129348.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sjoukje E Bouma
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Juliette F E van Beek
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ron L Diercks
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas H V van der Woude
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Martin Stevens
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge van den Akker-Scheek
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McKevitt S, Jinks C, Healey EL, Quicke JG. The attitudes towards, and beliefs about, physical activity in people with osteoarthritis and comorbidity: A qualitative investigation. Musculoskeletal Care 2021; 20:167-179. [PMID: 34245657 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the attitudes towards, and beliefs about, physical activity (PA) in older adults with osteoarthritis (OA) and comorbidity to understand experiences and seek ways to improve PA participation. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with adults aged ≥45, with self-reported OA and comorbidity (N = 17). Face-to-face interviews explored participant perspectives regarding; (1) attitudes and beliefs about PA in the context of OA and comorbidity and (2) how people with OA and comorbidity could be encouraged to improve and maintain PA levels. Data were transcribed verbatim and inductive thematic analysis was undertaken using a framework approach. RESULTS Participants did not conceptualise multiple long-term conditions (LTCs) together and instead self-prioritised OA over other LTCs. Barriers to PA included uncertainty about both the general management of individual LTCs and the effectiveness of PA for their LTCs; and, negative perceptions about their health, ageing and PA. Participants experienced dynamic and co-existing barriers to PA, and problematized this as a multi-level process, identifying a barrier, then a solution, followed by a new barrier. Facilitators of PA included social support and support from knowledgeable healthcare professionals (HCPs), together with PA adapted for OA and comorbidity and daily life. PA levels could be increased through targeted interventions to increase self-efficacy for managing OA alongside other LTCs and self-efficacy for PA. CONCLUSION People with OA and comorbidity experience complicated PA barriers. To increase PA levels, tailored PA interventions could include HCP and social support to anticipate and overcome multi-level PA barriers and target increased self-efficacy for LTC management and PA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah McKevitt
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Clare Jinks
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Emma L Healey
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jonathan G Quicke
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, UK.,Haywood Hospital, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huijbrechts EJ, Dekker J, Tenten-Diepenmaat M, Gerritsen M, van der Leeden M. Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design. J Foot Ankle Res 2021; 14:15. [PMID: 33632287 PMCID: PMC7908782 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-020-00435-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Foot and ankle problems are common in rheumatic disorders and often lead to pain and limitations in functioning, affecting quality of life. There appears to be large variability in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders across podiatrists. To increase uniformity and quality of podiatry care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and gout a clinical protocol has been developed. Research objectives [1] to evaluate an educational programme to train podiatrists in the use of the protocol and [2] to explore barriers and facilitators for the use of the protocol in daily practice. Method This study used a mixed method design and included 32 podiatrists in the Netherlands. An educational programme was developed and provided to train the podiatrists in the use of the protocol. They thereafter received a digital questionnaire to evaluate the educational programme. Subsequently, podiatrists used the protocol for three months in their practice. Facilitators and barriers that they experienced in the use of the protocol were determined by a questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were held to get more in-depth understanding. Results The mean satisfaction with the educational programme was 7.6 (SD 1.11), on a 11 point scale. Practical knowledge on joint palpation, programme variation and the use of practice cases were valued most. The protocol appeared to provide support in the diagnosis, treatment and evaluation of foot problems in rheumatic disorders and the treatment recommendations were clear and understandable. The main barrier for use of the protocol was time. The protocol has not yet been implemented in the electronic patient file, which makes it more time consuming. Other experienced barriers were the reimbursement for the treatment and financial compensation. Conclusions The educational programme concerning the clinical protocol for foot problems in rheumatic disorders appears to be helpful for podiatrists. Podiatrists perceived the protocol as being supportive during patient management. Barriers for use of the protocol were identified and should be addressed prior to large scale implementation. Whether the protocol is also beneficial for patients, needs to be determined in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Huijbrechts
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre
- Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, PO 58271, 1040, HG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Fontys University of applied sciences
- Department of allied health professionals, Fontys Paramedische Hogeschool, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - J Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Tenten-Diepenmaat
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre
- Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, PO 58271, 1040, HG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Saxion University of applied sciences
- department of healthcare, Saxion, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - M Gerritsen
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre
- Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, PO 58271, 1040, HG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M van der Leeden
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre
- Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, PO 58271, 1040, HG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Rooij M, van der Leeden M, van der Esch M, Lems WF, Meesters JJL, Peter WF, Roorda LD, Terbraak MS, Vredeveld T, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Dekker J. Evaluation of an educational course for primary care physiotherapists on comorbidity-adapted exercise therapy in knee osteoarthritis: an observational study. Musculoskeletal Care 2020; 18:122-133. [PMID: 31985164 PMCID: PMC7318645 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective The objectives of the present study were to: (1) evaluate the effect of an educational course on competence (knowledge and clinical reasoning) of primary care physical therapists (PTs) in treating patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and comorbidity according to the developed strategy; and (2) identify facilitators and barriers for usage. Method The present research was an observational study with a pretest‐posttest design using mixed methods. PTs were offered a postgraduate course consisting of e‐learning and two workshops (blended education) on the application of a strategy for exercise prescription in patients with KOA and comorbidity. Competences were measured by questionnaire on knowledge (administered before and 2 weeks after the course), and a patient vignette to measure clinical reasoning (administered before the course and after a 6 month period of treating patients). Facilitators and barriers for using the strategy were assessed by a questionnaire and semi‐structured interviews. Results Thirty‐four PTs were included. Competence (knowledge and clinical reasoning) improved significantly (p < 0.01). Fourteen out of 34 PTs had actually treated patients with KOA and comorbidity, during a 6‐month period. The strategy was found to be feasible in daily practice. The main barriers included the limited number of (self‐) referrals of patients, limited number of reimbursed treatment sessions by insurance companies and a suboptimal collaboration with (referring) physicians. Conclusion A blended course on exercise therapy for patients with KOA and comorbidity seems to improve PTs' competence through increasing knowledge and clinical reasoning skills. Identified barriers should be solved before large‐scale implementation of exercise therapy can take place in these complex patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariëtte de Rooij
- Reade, Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marike van der Leeden
- Reade, Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin van der Esch
- Reade, Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,ACHIEVE Centre of Expertise, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willem F Lems
- Reade, Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jorit J L Meesters
- Department of Orthopedics, Rehabilitation, and Physiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Wilfred F Peter
- Reade, Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Orthopedics, Rehabilitation, and Physiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Reade, Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel S Terbraak
- ACHIEVE Centre of Expertise, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tom Vredeveld
- ACHIEVE Centre of Expertise, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thea P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopedics, Rehabilitation, and Physiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|