Serial electrodiagnostic testing: Utility and indications in adult neurological disorders

Although existing guidelines address electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing in identifying neuromuscular conditions, guidance regarding the uses and limitations of serial (or repeat) EDX testing is limited. By assessing neurophysiological change longitudinally across time, serial electrodiagnosis can clarify a diagnosis and potentially provide valuable prognostic information. This monograph presents four broad indications for serial electrodiagnosis in adult peripheral neurological disorders. First, where clinical change has raised suspicion for a new or ongoing lesion, EDX reassessment for spatial spread of abnormality, involvement of previously normal muscle or nerve, and/or evolving pathophysiology can clarify a diagnosis. Second, where diagnosis of a progressive neuromuscular condition is uncertain, electrophysiological data from a second time point can confirm or refute suspicion. Third, to establish prognosis after a static nerve injury, a repeat study can assess the presence and extent of reinnervation. Finally, faced with a limited initial study (as when complicated by patient or environmental factors), a repeat EDX study can supplement missing or limited data to provide needed clarity. Repeat EDX studies carry certain limitations, however, such as with prognostication in the setting of remote or chronic lesions, sensory predominant fascicular injury, or mild axonal injury. Nevertheless, serial electrodiagnosis remains a valuable and underused tool in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of neuromuscular conditions.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP): mechanisms of action and clinical and genetic considerations

INTRODUCTION

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune peripheral nerve disorder that is characterized by subacute onset, progressive or relapsing weakness, and sensory deficits. Proven treatments include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), corticosteroids, and plasma exchange. This review focuses on the mechanisms of action, pharmacodynamics, genetic variations, and disease characteristics that can affect the efficacy of IVIg.

AREAS COVERED

The proposed mechanisms of action of IVIg that can mediate its therapeutic effects are reviewed. These include anti-idiotypic interactions, inhibition of neonatal Fc receptors (FcRn), anti-complement activity, upregulation of inhibitory FcγRIIB receptors, and downregulation of macrophage activation or co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules. Clinical and genetic factors that can affect the therapeutic response include misdiagnosis, degree of axonal damage, pharmacokinetic variability, and genetic variations.

EXPERT OPINION

The mechanisms of action of IVIg in CIDP and their relative contribution to its efficacy are subject of ongoing investigation. Studies in other autoimmune neurological conditions, in addition, highlight the role of key immunopathological pathways and factors that are likely to be affected. Further investigation into the pathogenesis of CIDP and the mechanisms of action of IVIg may lead to the development of improved diagnostics, better utilization of IVIg, and more targeted and effective therapies.

Versorgungssituation von CIDP-Patienten in neun deutschen Zentren des Neuritis Netzes

Hintergrund

Die Diagnose und Behandlung von Patienten mit immunvermittelten Polyneuropathien ist aufgrund der Heterogenität der Erkrankungen herausfordernd.

Ziel der Arbeit

Ein aktueller epidemiologischer Überblick über die Versorgungssituation von Patienten mit immunvermittelten Polyneuropathien innerhalb des deutschen Neuritis-Netzwerks „Neuritis Netz“.

Material und Methoden

Es erfolgte eine Umfrage in neun deutschen neurologischen Zentren, die auf die Betreuung von Patienten mit Immunneuropathie spezialisiert sind. Wir erfassten Diagnose, Vorgehen in der Diagnostik und Nachsorge, typische Symptome bei Manifestation und im Krankheitsverlauf sowie Therapiedaten.

Ergebnisse

Die Erhebung umfasst Daten von 1529 jährlich behandelten Patienten mit Immunneuropathien, 1320 davon mit chronisch inflammatorisch demyelinisierender Polyneuropathie (CIDP). Die Diagnostik umfasste fast immer Lumbalpunktionen sowie Elektroneuro- und -myografien entsprechend den aktuellen Leitlinien. Der Einsatz von Ultraschall, Biopsie und MRT war unterschiedlich. Wichtigster klinischer Parameter zum Therapiemonitoring in allen Zentren war die motorische Funktion in den klinischen Nachuntersuchungen. Zur Erhaltungstherapie wurde bei rund 15 % der Patienten ein breites Spektrum unterschiedlicher Immunsuppressiva eingesetzt.

Diskussion

Die Studie liefert wichtige epidemiologische Daten zur aktuellen Versorgungsituation von Patienten mit Immunneuropathien in Deutschland. Die Weiterentwicklung spezifischer Empfehlungen zur Therapie und Nachverfolgung von CIDP-Patienten ist notwendig, um einen einheitlichen Standard der Patientenversorgung zu gewährleisten. Dieses wird durch die strukturierte Zusammenarbeit von Exzellenzzentren wie dem deutschen Neuritis Netz erheblich unterstützt.

The value of MUNIX as an objective electrophysiological biomarker of disease progression in CIDP

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Objective outcome measures to monitor treatment response and guide treatment are lacking in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We aimed to evaluate the motor unit number index (MUNIX) as an outcome measurement in patients with CIDP and investigate the correlation of MUNIX with functional and standard electrodiagnostic tests in a single follow-up study.

METHODS

We evaluated MUNIX of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), and tibialis anterior (TA) muslces bilaterally. Muscle force was assessed by Medical Research Council sumscores (MRCSS). Functional measures used were the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score (ONLS) and the Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) at baseline and after six months of treatment. Standard electrophysiology was evaluated by the Nerve Conduction Study Score (NCSS).

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included at baseline, and 16 completed the follow-up study. Significant correlations were found between the MUNIX sumscore and both MRCSS and NCSS at baseline, between both the pinch strength and grip and upper limb MUNIX at baseline and follow-up, and between MUNIX of TA and both lower limb MRCSS with lower limb ONLS at baseline and follow-up. Significant correlations also were found between MUNIX sumscore change and MRCSS change, R-ODS change, and ONLS change.

DISCUSSION

MUNIX changes correlated with strength and electrophysiological improvements in CIDP patients. This suggests that MUNIX may represent a useful objective biomarker for patient follow-up.

Outcome measures and biomarkers in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from research to clinical practice

Introduction: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated syndrome characterized clinically by weakness and/or numbness that evolves over 2 months or more. The heterogeneity of clinical features necessitates an individualized approach to disease monitoring that takes lessons learned from clinical trials and applies them to clinical practice.Areas covered: This review discusses the importance of clinimetrics and biomarkers in CIDP diagnosis and disease monitoring. Highlighted are the challenges of defining responses to immunotherapy, the usefulness, and limitations of utilizing evidence-based clinical outcome measures during routine clinical care, and the evolving understanding of how diagnostic and disease activity biomarkers may reshape our treatment and disease monitoring paradigms.Expert opinion: Although disability and impairment outcome measures are commonly used in CIDP to indicate disease status, the nonspecific nature of these metrics limits the ability to attribute a change in any given metric to a change in CIDP. This interpretive challenge may be magnified by inconsistencies in the direction of change as well as a strong placebo effect. There is a need to improve our understanding of minimally important changes in existing outcome measures as a means to personalize treatment and to better assess disease activity status with biomarker discovery.

Electrophysiological predictors of response to subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To assess axonal function prior to subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy or placebo in relation to relapse in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to determine whether axonal damage can predict therapy response.

METHODS

Relapse rates in patients from the Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study, where patients were treated with placebo or SCIG (IgPro20), were analyzed by baseline (post-intravenous immunoglobulin stabilization) axonal damage (≤1 mV peroneal compound muscle action potential) status.

RESULTS

In patients with non-axonal damage, relapses were significantly higher with placebo (73.0%) than IgPro20 (0.2 g/kg: 39.1%, 0.4 g/kg: 19.2%). In patients with axonal damage, IgPro20 had no effect on relapse (placebo: 25.0%, IgPro20: 0.2 g/kg: 30.0%, 0.4 g/kg: 19.4%). Patients with axonal damage relapsed significantly less on placebo versus non-axonal damage, but they also demonstrated higher baseline disability.

CONCLUSION

Axonal damage may correspond to relapse upon treatment withdrawal; patients with axonal damage relapse less, possibly reflecting poor response to immunoglobulin therapy, while non-axonal damage patients may experience more relapse, perhaps indicating better treatment response.

SIGNIFICANCE

In CIDP patients with axonal loss, immunoglobulin therapy may not be as effective. Assessing axonal damage could help guide therapy, with immunoglobulins ideally used before substantial axonal damage arises.

Monitoring Clinical Course and Treatment Response in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy During Routine Care: A Review of Clinical and Laboratory Assessment Measures

Importance

Identifying clinical change in many neurologic diseases, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), can be challenging. At the same time, how change is defined heavily influences a patient's diagnostic and treatment pathway. It can be especially problematic when equivocal subjective observations are interpreted as clinically meaningful and then used to make diagnostic and treatment decisions. Change in clinical trials is strictly defined by a preselected metric, but there is a perception that formal outcomes collection during routine clinical care is neither feasible nor necessary. Given the importance placed on how change is interpreted, there is a need to select assessments that can be applied to routine care that are representative of the neurologic disease state.

Observations

For an outcome measure to be useful during clinical trials, it must have good reliability, validity, be responsive to change, and have clinical meaning. To be useful during routine clinical care, the assessment must additionally be easy to collect without the need for extensive training or equipment and should provide an immediately available result that can be rapidly quantified and interpreted. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is clinically heterogeneous and so is best evaluated with a diverse group of assessment tools. Assessing strength impairment, disability, and quality of life is ideally suited for everyday practice when caring for patients with CIDP. While electrophysiologic studies, imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and nodal/paranodal antibodies can provide diagnostic data, they are less practical and helpful longitudinal assessment tools.

Conclusions and Relevance

Sound clinimetric outcome measures in CIDP are widely available and have the potential to help clinicians objectify treatment response and disease progression. Such data are critically important when justifying the need for ongoing or periodic immunotherapy, documenting relapse or deterioration, or providing reassurance of disease improvement, stability, or remission.

Application of CMAP scan for the evaluation of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a prospective study

AIMS

We aimed to assess the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan in the follow-up of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients and investigate the correlation of CMAP scan parameters with functional and standard electrodiagnostic tests.

METHODS

We evaluated four parameters of abductor pollicis brevis (APB) CMAP scan (i.e., step numbers, step percentage, S10, S90), functional measures (e.g., Medical Research Council Sum Scores), and electrodiagnostic tests, including nerve conduction study (NCS) and motor NCS of the median nerve in the baseline and after six months of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients completed baseline clinical and electrodiagnostic studies. However, sixteen patients completed the follow-up study. The median of step numbers at baseline was 3.5 (2-4.2), which decreased to 2.5 (0-3) (p = 0.005). After the treatment, step percentage reduced from 28.6 (23.9-38.7) to 13.4 (0-23.6) (p = 0.001). The scores obtained from the clinical scales showed significant recovery of most of the functions, while the alterations of NCSS and NCS of the median nerve were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant reduction in step number and step percentage after follow-up. This alteration was not reflected in standard electrodiagnostic values. The improvement of functional scales alongside the CMAP scan parameters suggests that the CMAP scan could be considered an appropriate outcome measurement in research and clinical fields.

Electrophysiological testing in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy patients treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin: The Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study

OBJECTIVE

To assess electrophysiology parameters that can reflect patients' clinical status and show changes in nerve function with treatment, in a study of subcutaneous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

METHODS

Nerve conduction studies (latency, conduction velocity, conduction block and compound muscle action potential [CMAP] on upper limb median, ulnar, and lower limb peroneal motor nerves) were conducted in the placebo-controlled PATH (Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra) study of two doses of maintenance subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) IgPro20 in CIDP.

RESULTS

Averaged proximal latency substantially increased with placebo (+1.1 ms) indicating electrophysiologic deterioration but remained stable with IgPro20 (0.2 g/kg bodyweight [bw]: +0.1 ms; 0.4 g/kg bw: -0.1 ms). Distal latencies were also more prolonged with placebo versus IgPro20. Averaged motor nerve conduction velocity substantially decreased with placebo (-1.6 m/s) versus increasing in both IgPro20 groups (+0.2 m/s and +1.0 m/s, respectively). Conduction block and CMAP amplitudes did not change substantially.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the effectiveness of maintenance IgPro20, as nerve function changed in the direction of increasing nerve dysfunction with placebo but remained stable with ongoing IgPro20 therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

Electrophysiology testing can support assessment of clinical status in CIDP to determine treatment efficacy.

Electrophysiological Responsiveness to Long-Term Therapy in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Case Report

Electrophysiological studies are essential for the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), but the utility of nerve conduction studies in monitoring outcomes in individual CIDP patients is controversial. Electrophysiological improvements after short-term treatment have been described in large cohorts of CIDP patients, but the magnitude of the changes is small and might be obscured in individual patients due to the variation inherent in nerve conduction testing. We present the case of a CIDP patient treated successfully with immunosuppression and followed for 31 years with serial standardized clinical and electrophysiological evaluations. Improvement in electrophysiological parameters lagged clinical changes for up to 2 years, but all motor parameters improved (distal motor and F wave latencies, conduction velocities, and compound muscle action potential amplitudes) even with evidence of initial axonal damage. Worsening of electrophysiological parameters, specifically increasing F wave latencies, heralded clinical relapse by as much as a year. Electrophysiological parameters do improve with treatment in CIDP patients, although the changes can take up to 2 years, and also worsening electrophysiological parameters can herald clinical relapse and might help guide therapeutic decisions.

Measuring disease activity and predicting response to intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is characterised by significant clinical heterogeneity and as such reliable biomarkers are required to measure disease activity and assess treatment response. Recent advances in our understanding of disease pathogenesis and the discovery of novel serum-based, electrophysiologic and imaging biomarkers allow clinicians to make more informed decisions regarding individualised treatment regimes.

As a chronic immune-mediated process typified by relapse following withdrawal of immunomodulatory therapy, a substantial proportion of patients with CIDP require long term treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), a scarce and expensive donor-derived resource. The required duration and intensity of immunoglobulin treatment vary widely between individuals, highlighting both the heterogeneous nature of the underlying disease process as well as the variable pharmacologic properties of IVIg.

This review outlines the use of multimodal biomarkers in the longitudinal evaluation of nerve injury and how recent developments have impacted our ability to predict both response to immunoglobulin administration and its withdrawal.

Nerve Ultrasound Predicts Treatment Response in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy-a Prospective Follow-Up

As reliable biomarkers of disease activity are lacking, monitoring of therapeutic response in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) remains a challenge. We sought to determine whether nerve ultrasound and electrophysiology scoring could close this gap. In CIDP patients (fulfilling EFNS/PNS criteria), we performed high-resolution nerve ultrasound to determine ultrasound pattern sum scores (UPSS) and predominant echotexture nerve conduction study scores (NCSS) as well as Medical Research Council sum scores (MRCSS) and inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment disability scores (INCAT) at baseline and after 12 months of standard treatment. We retrospectively correlated ultrasound morphology with nerve histology when available. 72/80 CIDP patients featured multifocal nerve enlargement, and 35/80 were therapy-naïve. At baseline, clinical scores correlated with NCSS (r2 = 0.397 and r2 = 0.443, p < 0.01), but not or hardly with UPSS (Medical Research Council sum scores MRCSS r2 = 0.013, p = 0.332; inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment disability scores INCAT r2 = 0.053, p = 0.048). Longitudinal changes in clinical scores, however, correlated significantly with changes in both UPSS and NCSS (r2 = 0.272-0.414, p < 0.0001). Combining nerve/fascicle size with echointensity and histology at baseline, we noted 3 distinct classes: 1) hypoechoic enlargement, reflecting active inflammation and onion bulbs; 2) nerve enlargement with additional hyperechogenic fascicles/perifascicular tissue in > 50% of measured segments, possibly reflecting axonal degeneration; and 3) almost no enlargement, reflecting "burned-out" or "cured" disease without active inflammation. Clinical improvement after 12 months was best in patients with pattern 1 (up to 75% vs up to 43% in pattern 2/3, Fisher's exact test p < 0.05). Nerve ultrasound has additional value not only for diagnosis, but also for classification of disease state and may predict treatment response.

Measuring disease activity and clinical response during maintenance therapy in CIDP: from ICE trial outcome measures to future clinical biomarkers

Some patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy who respond to initial intravenous immunoglobulin require repeated courses over prolonged periods of time; however, evidence to guide dosage and interval of intravenous immunoglobulin during maintenance therapy is limited. Optimizing treatment requires assessment of underlying disease activity and clinical outcome. Electrophysiological measures of demyelination, and clinical measures using handgrip strength and walking velocity promise to be particularly informative. Major advances in resolution and image processing have expanded clinical applications for ultrasound to include the study of peripheral nerves. Ultrasonography shows promise in diagnosing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and distinguishing it from other conditions, providing first ever insight into gross pathology of peripheral nerves. Ultrasonography may also have a role in monitoring disease activity and treatment response.

The dilemma of diabetes in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

PURPOSE

We reviewed the literature on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in diabetes mellitus (DM) and explored real-world data on the prevalence and treatment of CIDP within DM.

METHODS

A literature search of Scopus was performed for the terms chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, CIDP, and prevalence, incidence, epidemiology, or diabetes; peripheral neuropathy and prevalence or diabetes. We also searched through the reference lists of the resulting publications for additional findings that may have been missed. Additional publications on guidelines for the diagnosis of CIDP and diabetic neuropathy were also included. A descriptive analysis of the 2009-2013 PharMetrics Plus™ Database was performed to estimate the prevalence and treatment of CIDP within the DM population.

RESULTS

There is an increasing body of literature suggesting that the prevalence of CIDP tends to be higher in diabetic patients, especially in those of older age. Our real-world data seem to support published findings from the literature. For the total cohort (N=101,321,694), the percent prevalence of CIDP (n=8,173) was 0.008%; DM (n=4,026,740) was 4%. The percent prevalence of CIDP without DM (n=5,986) was 0.006%; CIDP with DM (n=2,187) was 9-fold higher at 0.054%. For patients >50years old, there was a significantly higher percentage of CIDP with DM than CIDP without DM. Approximately 50% of CIDP patients were treated with IVIg, 23%-24% with steroids, 1%-2% with PE, and 20%-23% received no treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the growing evidence of higher prevalence of CIDP in DM, our findings reinforce the need for heightened awareness of the association of CIDP and DM.