Early fast-acting treatment strategy against generalized myasthenia gravis

Real-World Case Series of Efgartigimod for Japanese Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Well-Tailored Treatment Cycle Intervals Contribute to Sustained Symptom Control

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG), an immune disorder affecting nerve-muscle transmission, often necessitates tailored therapies to alleviate longitudinal symptom fluctuations. Here, we aimed to examine and compare the treatment cycle intervals and efficacy of efgartigimod in four patients. This case series mainly offers insights into personalized treatment cycle intervals and the efficacy of efgartigimod for patients with MG in our facility in Japan.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed four patients with MG (2 patients with early-onset, 1 with late-onset, and 1 with seronegative MG, mainly managed with oral immunosuppressants as prior treatments) who completed four or more cycles of efgartigimod treatment from January 2022 to September 2023. We focused on changes in serum immunoglobulin (IgG) level, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab) titer, and quantitative MG (QMG) score.

RESULTS

Efgartigimod, administered at a median of 5.0 [IQR 5.0, 7.5] weeks between cycles, led to decreased serum IgG levels in all patients and reduced AChR-Ab titers in seropositive patients. All patients showed sustained MG symptom improvement, with considerably reduced QMG scores before efgartigimod treatment. None of the patients required rescue medications or developed treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Customized efgartigimod administration intervals effectively enhanced clinical outcomes in patients with MG without notable symptom fluctuations, demonstrating the benefits of individualized treatment approaches and validating the safety of efgartigimod during the study period.

Efficacy of ravulizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis by time from diagnosis: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION MG study

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

The CHAMPION MG study demonstrated that ravulizumab significantly improved Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess these outcomes by time from MG diagnosis.

METHODS

Changes from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL and QMG total scores were analyzed by time from MG diagnosis to study entry (≤2 vs. >2 years). Within each subgroup, least-squares (LS) mean changes for ravulizumab and placebo were compared using mixed models for repeated measures.

RESULTS

In ravulizumab-treated patients, differences in LS mean (standard error of the mean) changes from baseline to week 26 were not statistically significant in the ≤2-years subgroup versus the >2-years subgroup for MG-ADL (-4.3 [0.70] vs. -2.9 [0.37]; p = .0511) or QMG (-4.3 [0.94] vs. -2.5 [0.50]; p = .0822) scores. No clear trends were observed in the placebo group. LS mean changes from baseline were significantly greater for ravulizumab versus placebo in both the ≤2 and >2 years from diagnosis subgroups for MG-ADL and QMG scores (all p < .05). The difference in treatment effect between the ≤2-years and >2-years subgroups was not statistically significant. No clinically meaningful between-subgroup differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ravulizumab-treated patients.

DISCUSSION

Ravulizumab treatment improved clinical outcomes for patients with AChR+ gMG regardless of time from diagnosis. A numerical trend was observed favoring greater treatment effect with earlier versus later treatment after diagnosis. Further studies are required for confirmation.

Clinical features of double seronegative ocular myasthenia gravis

PURPOSE

To clarify the clinical features of patients with Double seronegative (DS) ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG).

METHODS

Sixty-one patients diagnosed with DS OMG at the Department of Ophthalmology, Hyogo Medical University Hospital over a 5-year period from 2017 were included. Patients were classified into three groups based on the initial examination findings: group P (ptosis alone), group M (ocular motility disorder alone), and group PM (combination of both). We retrospectively reviewed the patients and clarified their clinical features.

RESULTS

There were 32 males and 29 females, with a mean age of 49.8 ± 20.9:1-82 years. Twenty-one patients (34.4%) were in group P, 23 (37.7%) in group M, and 17 (27.8%) in group PM. The proportion of males (73.9%) was significantly higher in group M compared with the other two groups. The diagnosis was proven by detection of neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorder in 73.8%, oral pyridostigmine trial test in 13.1%, and eight patients (13.1%) in group M were diagnosed after surgical treatment. The clinical symptoms were resolved by oral pyridostigmine treatment in 54.1% of cases.

CONCLUSION

About 30% of patients with DS OMG had no obvious NMJ disorder, and an oral pyridostigmine trial test was necessary to diagnose these patients. Although DS OMG is often considered as the mildest form of MG, its prognosis is not optimistic and it requires aggressive therapeutic intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number: 202104-750, "2016/4/18," retrospectively registered.

Serum immunoglobulin G level reduction is a predictor of short-term improvement in patients with myasthenia gravis undergoing plasmapheresis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate the serological factors in predicting symptom improvement in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients who underwent plasmapheresis (PP).

METHODS

The relationship between symptom improvement and change in immunoglobin G (IgG) and acetylcholine receptor antibody (AchR-Ab) levels in 21 MG patients after PP was analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into two groups: the favorable (n = 11) or unfavorable (n = 10) response groups around the median MG composite improvement rate (50 [29, 56]%) 2 weeks after a PP course. In all patients, the IgG reduction rate before and after PP was higher in the favorable than the unfavorable response group. In AChR-Ab-positive patients, IgG and AChR-Ab reduction rates were higher in the favorable than the unfavorable response group.

CONCLUSION

IgG reduction rate is a predictor of symptom improvement in MG patients who underwent PP.

Dexamethasone improves thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis via the AKT-mTOR pathway

Clinically, thymoma patients are often complicated with myasthenia gravis (MG). Dexamethasone, a glucocorticoid with anti-inflammatory effects, could be used as an immunosuppressant for thymoma-associated MG, but the mechanism of action remains to be explored. In this study, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) of potential targets was performed by screening the intersection targets of dexamethasone and thymoma-associated MG from the database. Furthermore, the key targets and core active components were identified by topological analysis of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Molecular docking technology was applied to screen the complexes with stable binding of dexamethasone and core targets. Patients with thymoma were divided into two groups according to whether they received dexamethasone before operation, and immunohistochemistry and western blot were used to verify the selected target of dexamethasone in treating thymoma-associated MG. The results showed that the action pathway of dexamethasone on the disease was closely enriched to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B (PKB/AKT), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways. The expressions of AKT1 and its downstream molecule mTOR in the thymoma microenvironment of thymoma-associated MG patients who did not receive dexamethasone before operation were higher than those in the group receiving dexamethasone before operation. This study demonstrates that dexamethasone can promote apoptosis through the AKT-mTOR pathway for the treatment of thymoma-associated MG, as validated by network pharmacology predictions and clinical specimen experiments, and can be verified by large-scale clinical trials in the future. This study also provides theoretical support and new research perspectives for this disease.

Biological therapies for myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Recently, treatments for myasthenia gravis (MG) have progressed significantly. Symptoms of some patients with refractory MG are not relieved by conventional therapies, and such patients might benefit from novel biological treatments that are being developed.

AREAS COVERED

We review several novel biological therapies for MG, such as complement inhibitors, neonatal Fc receptor inhibitors, anti-B cell drugs, and IL-6 receptor inhibitors. We also report the modes of action, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Several biological therapies have been developed for MG, and these biologics are promising agents for treating refractory MG. Establishing biomarkers and accumulating evidence of therapeutic response is required to provide the most appropriate biological treatment for each patient.

Effectiveness of early cycles of fast-acting treatment in generalised myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Early fast-acting treatment (EFT) is the aggressive use of fast-acting therapies such as plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and/or intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone (IVMP) from the early phases of treatment. EFT is reportedly beneficial for early achievement of minimal manifestations (MM) or better status with ≤5 mg/day prednisolone (MM5mg), a practical therapeutic target for myasthenia gravis (MG).

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to clarify which specific EFT regimen is efficacious and the patient characteristics that confer sensitivity to EFT.

METHODS

We recruited a total of 1710 consecutive patients with MG who enrolled in the Japan MG Registry for this large-cohort study. Among them, 1066 with generalised MG who had received immunotherapy were analysed. Prognostic background factors were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching analysis between patients treated with EFT (n=350) and those treated without EFT (n=350). The clinical course and time to first achieve MM5mg after starting immunotherapy was analysed in relation to treatment combinations and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that EFT had a significant effect on the achievement of MM5mg (p<0.0001, log-rank test; HR 1.82, p<0.0001). Notably, EFT was efficacious for any type of MG, and the inclusion of IVMP resulted in earlier and more frequent achievement of MM5mg (p=0.0352, log-rank test; HR 1.46, p=0.0380). In addition, early administration of calcineurin inhibitors also promoted MM5mg achievement.

CONCLUSION

Early cycles of intervention with EFT and early use of calcineurin inhibitors provides long-term benefits in terms of achieving therapeutic targets for generalised MG, regardless of clinical subtype.

Minimal symptom expression achievement over time in generalized myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVES

Minimal symptom expression (MSE), defined as myasthenia gravis (MG) activities of daily living profile (MGADL) score 0 or 1, has been recently used as an indicator of treatment goal in MG. However, no study has determined when MSE is achieved. The current study aimed to investigate the timing and incidence of MSE achievement in generalized MG patients.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized MG were included. They were followed-up maximum 3 years after starting immunotherapy, and we reviewed the MGADL score, prednisolone dose, and achievement of MSE and minimal manifestations (MM) or better status.

RESULTS

MSE was achieved in 37.6, 45.2, 55.8, 60.3, and 57.1% of the patients at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment, respectively. Most patients who achieved MSE showed MM or better status at any phase. In addition, more than 2 years after the starting treatment, about 80% of patients who achieved MSE showed MM or better status with an oral prednisolone dose of 5 mg/day or less (MM-5 mg). Noteworthy, during the early stage of treatment, the proportion of patients who achieved MSE was higher than that who achieved MM-5 mg.

CONCLUSION

From the early phases of immunotherapy, MSE is a good marker of therapeutic goal in patients with generalized MG.

[The Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living score and associated factors to distinguish the refractory phase in generalized myasthenia gravis patients with 5 years or more disease duration]

Associated factors of the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score were investigated in 55 patients who had had generalized MG for more than 5 years. In multivariate analysis, correlates of the MG-ADL score at the last follow-up were the total number of fast-acting treatments (FTs) (standardized regression coefficient 0.617，P < 0.001) and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification (standardized regression coefficient 0.227，P = 0.032) (F = 32.7，P < 0.001). In patients with a score of 5 or more on MG-ADL at the last follow-up, tendency as follows were seen: 1) early-onset (P = 0.002), 2) longer duration (P = 0.014), 3) high frequency of MGFA classification V (P = 0.017), 4) high frequency of the total number of FTs (P < 0.001), and 5) higher dose of prednisolone at the last follow-up (P = 0.003). MGFA V, early-onset without depending on E-L-T classification, or difficulty of reduction for high doses of prednisolone can be the target of novel treatment for MG, and future prospective study will be expected.

Diagnosis and Management of Myasthenia Gravis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews updated diagnostic procedures and currently available treatment modalities for myasthenia gravis (MG).

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with MG can be classified based on antibody status and their clinical presentation; treatment responses may differ based on disease subtypes. Improved diagnostic methods and recognition of new antigenic targets such as lipoprotein-related protein 4 have led to improved diagnostic efficiencies. Corticosteroids remain the first-line immunotherapy, but there is a trend toward minimizing their use at high doses and for long durations. Oral immunosuppressants such as mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and tacrolimus remain useful. An international, multicenter randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus prednisone with prednisone alone demonstrated that thymectomy improves clinical outcomes in selected patients with nonthymomatous MG. Eculizumab, efgartigimod, and ravulizumab have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adult patients with generalized MG who are acetylcholine receptor-antibody positive. These drugs take advantage of novel mechanisms of action and expand treatment options for patients with MG. Data on rituximab suggest that it can be a good option, especially for patients with MG who are positive for antibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK). The number of clinical trials and drugs in development for MG is steadily increasing.

SUMMARY

The diagnosis of MG can generally be made from the patient's history, a neurologic examination, and laboratory and electrodiagnostic testing. Carefully selected treatment improves outcomes in MG. Additional treatment options for MG will likely be available in the near future.

Prediction of the generalization of myasthenia gravis with purely ocular symptoms at onset: a multivariable model development and validation

Background

About half of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with purely ocular symptoms at onset progress to generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

Objectives

To develop and validate a model to predict the generalization of MG at 6 months after disease onset in patients with ocular-onset myasthenia gravis (OoMG).

Methods

Data of patients with OoMG were retrospectively collected from two tertiary hospitals in Germany and China. An accelerated failure time model was developed using the backward elimination method based on the German cohort to predict the generalization of OoMG. The model was then externally validated in the Chinese cohort, and its performance was assessed using Harrell's C-index and calibration plots.

Results

Four hundred and seventy-seven patients (275 from Germany and 202 from China) were eligible for inclusion. One hundred and three (37.5%) patients in the German cohort progressed from OoMG to gMG with a median follow-up time of 69 (32-116) months. The median time to generalization was 29 (16-71) months. The estimated cumulative probability of generalization was 30.5% [95% CI (confidence interval), 24.3-36.2%) at 5 years after disease onset. The final model, which was represented as a nomogram, included five clinical variables: sex, titer of anti-AChR antibody, status of anti-MuSK antibody, age at disease onset and the presence of other autoimmune disease. External validation of the model using the bootstrap showed a C-index of 0.670 (95% CI, 0.602-0.738). Calibration curves revealed moderate agreement of predicted and observed outcomes.

Conclusion

The nomogram is a good predictor for generalization in patients with OoMG that can be used to inform of the individual generalization risk, which might improve the clinical decision-making.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Anti-AChR Positive Myasthenia Gravis Combined With Anti-LRP4 or Anti-Titin Antibody

Objective

This study aimed to summarize the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with anti- acetylcholine receptor (AChR) positive myasthenia gravis (MG) with a combination of anti-LRP4 or Titin antibodies.

Methods

A total of 188 patients with generalized MG before immunotherapy were retrospectively collected and then divided into three groups: single anti-AChR positive-MG (AChR-MG, 101 cases), anti-AChR combined with anti-low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein four-positive MG (AChR+LRP4-MG, 29 cases), and anti-AChR combined with anti-Titin-positive MG (AChR+Titin-MG, 58 cases). Clinical manifestations, therapeutic responses to immunotherapy, and follow-up information were analyzed.

Results

Of the 188 seropositive MG patients, 29 (15.4%) were positive for both AChR and LRP4 antibodies, and 58 (30.9%) were positive for both AChR and Titin antibodies. The mean disease onset ages in the three groups were 47.41 ± 7.0, 49.81 ± 9.2, and 48.11 ± 6.5 years, respectively. AChR+LRP4-MG showed female predominance (27.6% were males and 72.4% were females), with mild overall clinical symptoms. The AChR+Titin-MG group showed shorter times for conversion to generalized MG (5.14 ± 0.0 months) than the AChR-MG group (11.69 ± 0.0 months) and the AChR+LRP4-MG group (13.08 ± 0.5 months; P < 0.001 in both cases). Furthermore, AChR+Titin-MG group had increased bulbar dysfunction, higher incidences of thymoma (32.8 vs. 19.8% and 3.4%, P=0.035), more severe quantitative MG scores, as assessed by both QMG scores [15.5 (11.75–22.5) vs. 13 (8–19), P = 0.005; and 9 (6–14) P < 0.001], and MG-ADL scores [10 (8–13) vs. 8 (5–13), P = 0.018; and 6 (4–8), P < 0.001]. Treatment for AChR+Titin-MG was largely dependent on corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (56.7 vs. 19.2% and 16.7%, p = 0.028). The rates of achieving s(MMS) or better within 2 years following immunotherapy in the three groups were 51.5, 62.1, and 51.7%, respectively (P = 0.581).

Conclusion

Clinical symptoms of anti-AChR positive MG combined with Titin antibody were more severe and progressed faster than those in the AChR + LRP4 and AChR groups. Regardless of antibody status, all patients responded well to immunotherapy and had relatively good prognoses.

Factors affecting minimal manifestation status induction in myasthenia gravis

Background:

Minimal manifestation status (MMS) is an important landmark in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG), and predictors of MMS induction have rarely been identified in previous studies.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical factors associated with MMS induction among patients with MG.

Design:

This two-step retrospective cohort study with a single center investigated the factors that may be associated with MMS induction and retested these predictors in a test cohort.

Methods:

A total of 388 diagnosed MG patients who visited Xiangya Hospital between 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2019 were involved. We performed detailed chart reviews and recorded all cases achieving MMS. Demographics and clinical characteristics were also collected and their relationships to achieving MMS were investigated.

Results:

MMS was achieved in 124 patients (50.2%), and the median time to achieve MMS was 26 months. Several factors were found to be associated with MMS induction in exploring cohort, including muscle-specific tyrosine-protein kinase receptor (MuSK) antibody positivity (adjusted hazard ratio, HR = 4.333, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.862–10.082), isolated ocular involvement (adjusted HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.284–2.961), and low baseline quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMG score; adjusted HR = 2.022, 95% CI: 1.086–3.764). These factors were then retested in the test cohort. Isolated ocular involvement or low baseline QMG scores were factors found to be beneficial for MMS induction were confirmed.

Conclusion:

Isolated ocular involvement and low baseline QMG score are predictors of MMS induction in MG patients.

Immunoadsorption apheresis versus intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for exacerbation of myasthenia gravis

Immunoadsorption apheresis (IA) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is used to treat exacerbation of myasthenia gravis (MG). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between IA and IVIg for MG patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies. We retrospectively studied 19 AChR antibody-positive generalized MG patients who underwent IA (n = 9) or IVIg treatment (n = 10). We reviewed the MG activities of daily living profile (MG-ADL) scores at baseline, 1 and 3 months after the treatment. Adverse events during the treatment period were also reviewed. The MG-ADL scores showed significantly greater improvement from the baseline in the IA group than in the IVIg group (1 month: -7 vs -3, P = .035; 3 months -9 vs -2.5, P = .016). An adverse event that led to the discontinuation of the treatment was observed in only one patient in the IVIg group (anaphylactic reaction). Our data suggest that the IA treatment is safe and more efficacious than the IVIg treatment for aggravation of anti-AChR-positive MG. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm the finding.

Clinical Predictors of Prolonged Hospital Stay in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Study Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder that causes muscle weakness. Although the management is well established, some patients are refractory and require prolonged hospitalization. Our study is aimed to identify the important factors that predict the duration of hospitalization in patients with MG by using machine learning methods. A total of 21 factors were chosen for machine learning analyses. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with MG who were admitted to hospital. Five machine learning methods, including stochastic gradient boosting (SGB), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso), ridge regression (Ridge), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGboost), and gradient boosting with categorical features support (Catboost), were used to construct models for identify the important factors affecting the duration of hospital stay. A total of 232 data points of 204 hospitalized MG patients admitted were enrolled into the study. The MGFA classification, treatment of high-dose intravenous corticosteroid, age at admission, treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins, and thymoma were the top five significant variables affecting prolonged hospitalization. Our findings from machine learning will provide physicians with information to evaluate the potential risk of MG patients having prolonged hospital stay. The use of high-dose corticosteroids is associated with prolonged hospital stay and to be used cautiously in MG patients.

Long-term outcome in patients with myasthenia gravis: one decade longitudinal study

INTRODUCTION

Even treated, myasthenia gravis (MG) continues to represent a significant burden and might continuously affect patients' quality of life (QoL). The aim of our longitudinal study was to analyze QoL in a large cohort of MG patients after a 10-year follow-up period.

METHODS

This study comprised 78 MG patients (60% females, 50 ± 16 years old at baseline, 70% AchR positive) who were retested after 10 years. Disease severity was evaluated by MGFA classification. QoL was assessed using SF-36 questionnaire and Myasthenia Gravis-specific Questionnaire (MGQ). Hamilton rating scales for depression and anxiety (HDRS and HARS), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS) were also used.

RESULTS

Similar percentage of patients was in remission at both time points (42% and 45%). However, at baseline all patients were treated, while 32% were treatment-free at follow-up. SF-36, MGQ, MSPSS and AIS scores were similar at baseline and retest. Mean HDRS and HARS scores worsened during time (p < 0.05), although percentage of patients with depression and anxiety did not change significantly. Significant predictors of worse SF-36 score at retest were depression (β = - 0.45, p < 0.01), poor disease acceptance (β = - 0.44, p < 0.01) and older age (β = - 0.30, p < 0.01). Significant predictors of worse MGQ score at retest were poor disease acceptance (β = - 0.40, p < 0.01), retirement (β = - 0.36, p < 0.01), lower education (β = 0.25, p < 0.01), and depression (β = - 0.18, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although after 10 years, a significant number of MG patients were in remission, their QoL was still reduced. Neurologists should be aware that patients' perception of poor QoL may persist even if MG is well treated from a physician's perspective.

Rate of change in acetylcholine receptor antibody levels predicts myasthenia gravis outcome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between changes in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR Ab) levels induced by immunosuppressive treatment and myasthenia gravis (MG) prognosis at 1-year post-treatment in patients with MG.

METHODS

We included 53 consecutive AChR Ab-positive patients with MG whose AChR Ab levels were remeasured within 100 days of initiating immunosuppressive treatment (median remeasuring time post-treatment: 71 (55-84) days). The AChR Ab level reduction rate (RR-AChRAb, %/day) adjusted for the time between treatment initiation, and AChR Ab level remeasurement was calculated as follows: (pretreatment-post-treatment AChR Ab level)/pretreatment AChR Ab level/days between therapy initiation and AChR Ab level remeasurement ×100. Participants were divided into two groups based on the cut-off value of RR-AChR Ab, determined using receiver operating characteristic analyses for achieving minimal manifestation (MM) or better status at 1-year postimmunosuppressive treatment. The Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America postintervention status and MG activity of daily living (MG-ADL) score at 1-year post-treatment were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The RR-AChRAb cut-off value was 0.64%/day. The high RR-AChRAb group had a higher ratio of MM or better status (90% vs 65%, p=0.03) and lower MG-ADL score (median; 1 vs 2, p=0.04) than the low RR-AChRAb group. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed the early MM achievement in the high RR-AChRAb group (p=0.002, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

High RR-AChRAb is associated with a favourable outcome at 1-year post-treatment. AChR Ab remeasurement within 100 days of therapy may be useful for predicting AChR Ab-positive MG outcomes at 1-year post-treatment.

Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in generalized myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the timing of meeting the criteria for a status of "minimal manifestation (MM) or better" and the factors that influenced whether "MM or better status" or "MM or better status with an oral prednisolone (PSL) dose of 5 mg/day or less (5-mg MM)" was met in patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study in 93 patients with AChR antibody-positive generalized MG who were followed for 3 years after the start of immunotherapy. We reviewed clinical data, such as MG-related symptoms, the MG activities of daily living profile (MGADL) score, immunotherapy including the dose of PSL, and achievement of the status of MM or better at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment.

RESULTS

An MM or better status was achieved in 60% of the patients 3 months and in 90% of the patients 2 years after initiating immunotherapy. At 2 years, 60% of the patients had achieved the treatment goal, which was an "5-mg MM". More frequent plasmapheresis and higher dose of PSL within 3 months after immunotherapy initiation were associated with difficulty in achieving the 5-mg MM status at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 60% of the MG patients achieved the treatment goal within 2 years after treatment. PSL dose and the cumulative number of plasmapheresis procedures at 3 months after immunotherapy initiation may help identify treatment-resistant patients with MG.

Safety and effectiveness of eculizumab in Japanese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance

BACKGROUND

Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeted to terminal complement protein C5, is approved in Japan for treatment of patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) whose symptoms are difficult to control with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy or plasmapheresis.

METHODS

This interim analysis of mandatory post-marketing surveillance in Japan assessed the safety and effectiveness of eculizumab at 26 weeks after treatment initiation in patients with AChR+ gMG.

RESULTS

Data were available for 40 adult patients in Japan [62.5% (25/40) female; mean age at eculizumab initiation, 51.0 years]. Fifteen patients had a history of thymoma. Six patients were excluded from the effectiveness analysis set due to participation in the open-label extension part of the phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02301624]. After 26 weeks' follow up, 32 patients (80%) were continuing eculizumab treatment. Adverse drug reactions were reported by seven patients [most frequently headache (n = 3)]. One death was reported during eculizumab treatment (relationship unclear as determined by the treating physician) and there was one death 45 days after the last dose (considered unrelated). No meningococcal infections were reported. Mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores were -3.7 (2.61) (n = 27) and -5.6 (3.50) (n = 26), respectively, at 12 weeks, and -4.3 (2.72) (n = 26) and -5.6 (4.02) (n = 24), respectively, at 26 weeks. Improvements in MG-ADL and QMG scores were generally similar in patients with/without a history of thymoma. Frequency of IVIg use decreased following eculizumab initiation.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, eculizumab was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of AChR+ gMG in adult Japanese patients whose disease was refractory to IVIg or plasmapheresis. These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety results from the global phase III REGAIN study of eculizumab.

A Practical Approach to Managing Patients With Myasthenia Gravis-Opinions and a Review of the Literature

When the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been secured, the aim of management should be prompt symptom control and the induction of remission or minimal manifestations. Symptom control, with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as pyridostigmine, is commonly employed. This may be sufficient in mild disease. There is no single universally accepted treatment regimen. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of immunosuppressive treatment in patients with more than mild MG to induce remission. Immunosuppressive therapies, such as azathioprine are prescribed in addition to but sometimes instead of corticosteroids when background comorbidities preclude or restrict the use of steroids. Rituximab has a role in refractory MG, while plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin therapy are commonly prescribed to treat MG crisis and in some cases of refractory MG. Data from the MGTX trial showed clear evidence that thymectomy is beneficial in patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized MG, up to the age of 65 years. Minimally invasive thymectomy surgery including robotic-assisted thymectomy surgery has further revolutionized thymectomy and the management of MG. Ocular MG is not life-threatening but can be significantly disabling when diplopia is persistent. There is evidence to support early treatment with corticosteroids when ocular motility is abnormal and fails to respond to symptomatic treatment. Treatment needs to be individualized in the older age-group depending on specific comorbidities. In the younger age-groups, particularly in women, consideration must be given to the potential teratogenicity of certain therapies. Novel therapies are being developed and trialed, including ones that inhibit complement-induced immunological pathways or interfere with antibody-recycling pathways. Fatigue is common in MG and should be duly identified from fatigable weakness and managed with a combination of physical therapy with or without psychological support. MG patients may also develop dysfunctional breathing and the necessary respiratory physiotherapy techniques need to be implemented to alleviate the patient's symptoms of dyspnoea. In this review, we discuss various facets of myasthenia management in adults with ocular and generalized disease, including some practical approaches and our personal opinions based on our experience.

Update on immune-mediated therapies for myasthenia gravis

With the exception of thymectomy, immune modulatory treatment strategies and clinical trials in myasthenia gravis over the past 50 y were mainly borrowed from experience in other nonneurologic autoimmune disorders. The current experimental therapy paradigm has significantly changed such that treatments directed against the pathological mechanisms specific to myasthenia gravis are being tested, in some cases as the initial disease indication. Key advances have been made in three areas: (i) the expanded role and long-term benefits of thymectomy, (ii) complement inhibition to prevent antibody-mediated postsynaptic membrane damage, and (iii) neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition as in vivo apheresis, removing pathogenic antibodies. Herein, we discuss these advances and the potential for these newer therapies to significantly influence the current treatment paradigms. While these therapies provide exciting new options with rapid efficacy, there are anticipated challenges to their use, especially in terms of a dramatic increase in cost of care for some patients with myasthenia gravis.

Initial deterioration and intravenous methylprednisolone therapy in patients with myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

In myasthenia gravis (MG) patients on intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) therapy, initial deterioration should be carefully monitored because it may cause myasthenic crisis. The aim of this study was to investigate the onset, duration and related factors of initial deterioration from the first IVMP in MG patients.

METHODS

A total dose of IVMP in the first cycle of 750 mg or less, over 750 to 1500 mg, and over 1500 to 3000 mg was used in the analysis. Initial deterioration was evaluated in qualitative and quantitative evaluation and was defined as an increase of 2 or more points on the The Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale after the start of IVMP therapy in the quantitative evaluation.

RESULTS

We enrolled 51 mainly mild MG patients. The mode of onset of initial deterioration from the first IVMP treatment was day 4 in the qualitative and quantitative evaluation. In addition, the mode of duration was 3 days. In multiple logistic regression analysis, factors related to initial deterioration were MGFA classification with overall disease duration up to just before IVMP and thymectomy before IVMP in both the qualitative and the quantitative evaluation (p < .001). One to four cycles of IVMP improved the MG-ADL score at hospital discharge from that at the start of IVMP (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Disease severity and thymectomy before IVMP are related to initial deterioration in MG patients. IVMP can be repeated after initial deterioration weekly in most patients.

Maintenance immunosuppression in myasthenia gravis, an update

Therapies for myasthenia gravis (MG) include symptomatic and immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory treatment. Options for immunosuppression include corticosteroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, eculizumab, intravenous immunoglobulin, subcutaneous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and thymectomy. The practical aspects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy in MG are critically reviewed in this article. Application of one or more of these specific therapies is guided based on known efficacy, adverse effect profile, particular disease subtype and severity, and patient co-morbidities.

Long-term efficacy and safety of eculizumab in Japanese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: A subgroup analysis of the REGAIN open-label extension study

The terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab was shown to improve myasthenia gravis-related symptoms in the 26-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study (NCT01997229). In this 52-week sub-analysis of the open-label extension of REGAIN (NCT02301624), eculizumab's efficacy and safety were assessed in 11 Japanese and 88 Caucasian patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalized myasthenia gravis. For patients who had received placebo during REGAIN, treatment with open-label eculizumab resulted in generally similar outcomes in the Japanese and Caucasian populations. Rapid improvements were maintained for 52 weeks, assessed by change in score from open-label extension baseline to week 52 (mean [standard error]) using the following scales (in Japanese and Caucasian patients, respectively): Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (-2.4 [1.34] and - 3.3 [0.65]); Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (-2.9 [1.98] and - 4.3 [0.79]); Myasthenia Gravis Composite (-4.5 [2.63] and - 4.9 [1.19]); and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item questionnaire (-8.6 [5.68] and - 6.5 [1.93]). Overall, the safety of eculizumab was consistent with its known safety profile. In this interim sub-analysis, the efficacy and safety of eculizumab in Japanese and Caucasian patients were generally similar, and consistent with the overall REGAIN population.

Long-term effect of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in patients with non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis: 2-year extension of the MGTX randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The Thymectomy Trial in Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone (MGTX) showed that thymectomy combined with prednisone was superior to prednisone alone in improving clinical status as measured by the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis at 3 years. We investigated the long-term effects of thymectomy up to 5 years on clinical status, medication requirements, and adverse events.

METHODS

We did a rater-blinded 2-year extension study at 36 centres in 15 countries for all patients who completed the randomised controlled MGTX and were willing to participate. MGTX patients were aged 18 to 65 years at enrolment, had generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis of less than 5 years' duration, had acetylcholine receptor antibody titres of 1·00 nmol/L or higher (or concentrations of 0·50-0·99 nmol/L if diagnosis was confirmed by positive edrophonium or abnormal repetitive nerve stimulation, or abnormal single fibre electromyography), had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Clinical Classification Class II-IV disease, and were on optimal anticholinesterase therapy with or without oral corticosteroids. In MGTX, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either thymectomy plus prednisone or prednisone alone. All patients in both groups received oral prednisone at doses titrated up to 100 mg on alternate days until they achieved minimal manifestation status. The primary endpoints of the extension phase were the time-weighted means of the QMG score and alternate-day prednisone dose from month 0 to month 60. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00294658. It is closed to new participants, with follow-up completed.

FINDINGS

Of the 111 patients who completed the 3-year MGTX, 68 (61%) entered the extension study between Sept 1, 2009, and Aug 26, 2015 (33 in the prednisone alone group and 35 in the prednisone plus thymectomy group). 50 (74%) patients completed the 60-month assessment, 24 in the prednisone alone group and 26 in the prednisone plus thymectomy group. At 5 years, patients in the thymectomy plus prednisone group had significantly lower time-weighted mean QMG scores (5·47 [SD 3·87] vs 9·34 [5·08]; p=0·0007) and mean alternate-day prednisone doses (24 mg [SD 21] vs 48 mg [29]; p=0·0002) than did those in the prednisone alone group. 14 (42%) of 33 patients in the prednisone group, and 12 (34%) of 35 in the thymectomy plus prednisone group, had at least one adverse event by month 60. No treatment-related deaths were reported during the extension phase.

INTERPRETATION

At 5 years, thymectomy plus prednisone continues to confer benefits in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis compared with prednisone alone. Although caution is appropriate when generalising our findings because of the small sample size of our study, they nevertheless provide further support for the benefits of thymectomy in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

Oral corticosteroid dosing regimen and long-term prognosis in generalised myasthenia gravis: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan

OBJECTIVE

We examined the correlation between the dosing regimen of oral prednisolone (PSL) and the achievement of minimal manifestation status or better on PSL ≤5 mg/day lasting >6 months (the treatment target) in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS

We classified 590 patients with generalised MG into high-dose (n=237), intermediate-dose (n=187) and low-dose (n=166) groups based on the oral PSL dosing regimen, and compared the clinical characteristics, previous treatments other than PSL and prognosis between three groups. The effect of oral PSL dosing regimen on the achievement of the treatment target was followed for 3 years of treatment.

RESULTS

To achieve the treatment target, ORs for low-dose versus high-dose regimen were 10.4 (P<0.0001) after 1 year of treatment, 2.75 (P=0.007) after 2 years and 1.86 (P=0.15) after 3 years; and those for low-dose versus intermediate-dose regimen were 13.4 (P<0.0001) after 1 year, 3.99 (P=0.0003) after 2 years and 4.92 (P=0.0004) after 3 years. Early combined use of fast-acting treatment (OR: 2.19 after 2 years, P=0.02; OR: 2.11 after 3 years, P=0.04) or calcineurin inhibitors (OR: 2.09 after 2 years, P=0.03; OR: 2.36 after 3 years, P=0.02) was associated positively with achievement of treatment target.

CONCLUSION

A low-dose PSL regimen with early combination of other treatment options may ensure earlier achievement of the treatment target in generalised MG.

Rationale for the clinical guidelines for myasthenia gravis in Japan

According to the 2014 Japanese clinical guidelines for myasthenia gravis, the most important priority in treatment is maintaining patients' health-related quality of life. Therefore, the initial treatment goal is defined as maintaining a postintervention status of minimal manifestations or better (according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification) with an oral prednisolone dose of 5 mg/day or less. Every effort should be made to attain this level as rapidly as possible. To achieve this goal, the guidelines recommend minimizing the oral prednisolone dose, starting calcineurin inhibitors early in the course of treatment, using intravenous methylprednisolone infusion judiciously (often combined with plasma exchange/plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin), and effectively treating patients with an early, fast-acting treatment strategy. The early, fast-acting treatment strategy enables more frequent and earlier attainment of the initial goal than other strategies. Thymectomy is considered an option for treating nonthymomatous early-onset myasthenia gravis in patients with antiacetylcholine receptor antibodies and thymic hyperplasia in the early stages of the disease.

A retrospective study of acetylcholine receptor antibody positive ocular myasthenia in the West of Scotland

Ocular myasthenia is the milder end of the myasthenia gravis spectrum but treatment can be challenging especially in older patients. We retrospectively studied all patients on our database with ocular myasthenia (OMG), positive for acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies. We identified 93 patients (64 men and 29 women). The mean age at disease onset was 63y, median 68y. Most (72%) experienced ptosis with diplopia; 19% experienced ptosis alone, while 7.5% complained of diplopia without ptosis. As expected, pyridostigmine was commenced early at diagnosis in the majority (69%) and 20% were still receiving pyridostigmine at final review. Immunosuppression was prescribed in 50%. Seven patients had ptosis repair surgery; 20 patients used prisms at some stage. >75% had several comorbidities. Our OMG cohort is an older population with several comorbidities. Final outcomes in those who received immunosuppression were similar to those who had not.

Response to treatment of myasthenia gravis according to clinical subtype

Background

We have previously reported using two-step cluster analysis to classify myasthenia gravis (MG) patients into the following five subtypes: ocular MG; thymoma-associated MG; MG with thymic hyperplasia; anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab)-negative MG; and AChR-Ab-positive MG without thymic abnormalities. The objectives of the present study were to examine the reproducibility of this five-subtype classification using a new data set of MG patients and to identify additional characteristics of these subtypes, particularly in regard to response to treatment.

Methods

A total of 923 consecutive MG patients underwent two-step cluster analysis for the classification of subtypes. The variables used for classification were sex, age of onset, disease duration, presence of thymoma or thymic hyperplasia, positivity for AChR-Ab or anti–muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibody, positivity for other concurrent autoantibodies, and disease condition at worst and current. The period from the start of treatment until the achievement of minimal manifestation status (early-stage response) was determined and then compared between subtypes using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. In addition, between subtypes, the rate of the number of patients who maintained minimal manifestations during the study period/that of patients who only achieved the status once (stability of improved status) was compared.

Results

As a result of two-step cluster analysis, 923 MG patients were classified into five subtypes as follows: ocular MG (AChR-Ab-positivity, 77%; histogram of onset age, skewed to older age); thymoma-associated MG (100%; normal distribution); MG with thymic hyperplasia (89%; skewed to younger age); AChR-Ab-negative MG (0%; normal distribution); and AChR-Ab-positive MG without thymic abnormalities (100%, skewed to older age). Furthermore, patients classified as ocular MG showed the best early-stage response to treatment and stability of improved status, followed by those classified as thymoma-associated MG and AChR-Ab-positive MG without thymic abnormalities; by contrast, those classified as AChR-Ab-negative MG showed the worst early-stage response to treatment and stability of improved status.

Conclusions

Differences were seen between the five subtypes in demographic characteristics, clinical severity, and therapeutic response. Our five-subtype classification approach would be beneficial not only to elucidate disease subtypes, but also to plan treatment strategies for individual MG patients.