Physician- and self-assessed myasthenia gravis activities of daily living score

Concordance between patient- and physician-reported Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a neuromuscular disease characterized by abnormal skeletal muscle fatiguability. The MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale assesses eight symptoms and is often used as primary endpoint in MG clinical trials where it is completed by neurologists. However, in observational studies, patients frequently complete the MG-ADL scale independently of their neurologist. In this study we aimed to assess the concordance between self- and physician-reported MG-ADL scores.

METHODS

An international observational study was conducted among adult patients with MG scheduled for a routine visit or who entered the hospital via emergency services. Consenting patients and physicians completed the MG-ADL. Concordance between assessments was calculated using Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC) for the MG-ADL individual items and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the MG-ADL total score.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 137 patients (63% female; mean age, 57.7 years). Physicians assessed the patient's symptoms as slightly more severe (8.1 vs 7.5 MG-ADL total score, respectively), corresponding to a difference of 0.6 on a range from 0 to 24. The ICC for the MG-ADL total score between the patient and the physician assessment was 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 0.95), showing excellent concordance. Gwet's AC showed substantial to almost perfect agreement for all items, except eyelid droop, for which the agreement was moderate.

DISCUSSION

Our results demonstrate that patients and neurologists have a concordant assessment of the patient's MG symptoms when using the MG-ADL scale. This evidence supports patient self-administration of the MG-ADL in clinical practice and research.

Utilization of MG-ADL in myasthenia gravis clinical research and care

The Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Living (MG‐ADL) scale is an 8‐item patient‐reported scale that measures myasthenia gravis (MG) symptoms and functional status. The objective of the current review is to summarize the psychometric properties of the MG‐ADL and published evidence of MG‐ADL use. A targeted literature review for published studies of the MG‐ADL was conducted using a database and gray literature search. A total of 48 publications and 35 clinical trials were included. Studies indicated that the MG‐ADL is a reliable and valid measure that has been used as an outcome in clinical trials and observational studies to measure MG symptoms and response to treatment. While most often used as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials, its use as a primary endpoint has increased in recent years. The most common MG‐ADL endpoint is change in MG‐ADL score from baseline, although there has been an increase in the analysis of a responder threshold using the MG‐ADL. A new concept of minimal symptom expression (MSE) has emerged more recently. Duration of treatment effect is another important construct that is being increasingly evaluated using the MG‐ADL. The use of the MG‐ADL as a primary endpoint in clinical trials and in responder threshold analyses to indicate treatment improvement has increased in recent years. MSE using the MG‐ADL shows promise in helping to determine success of treatment and may be the aspirational goal of MG treatment for the future once validated, particularly given the evolving treatment landscape in MG.

The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic on the Psychological Status and Quality of Life of Myasthenia Gravis Patients

Objectives:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the largest pandemic of our times. We wanted to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological status, quality of life (QoL) and quality of sleep (QoS) of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients.

Methods:

Data on the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of MG were collected. We used a self-designed questionnaire (consisting of 12 questions), a revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MGQOL15r), a 36-item health survey of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF36), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Hamilton scales for the assessment of anxiety (HAM-A), and depression (HAMD) were used. We reassessed patients who were tested three years ago using the same questionnaires.

Results:

The study included 64 MG patients. We noticed a statistically significant difference between the results obtained three years ago and the results from April 2020 in PSQI scores (P < 0.01). MGQOL15r, SF36, and PSQI scores correlate with severe clinical manifestation, high scores on HAM-A and HAM-D (P < 0.01). Higher scores on HAM-D and fear that MG symptoms will be worse if the patient gets an upper respiratory infection were independent predictors of the lower SF36 scores. Regarding MGQOL15r-independent predictors of the higher score were higher scores on HAM-D.

Conclusions:

There is a significant impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on the psychological status and especially on the quality of sleep of MG patients. Healthcare organizations need to provide professional therapeutic advice and psychosocial support for this population of patients during the pandemic.

Factors associated with quality of life of people with Myasthenia Gravis

Purpose

As most of patients with Myasthenia Gravis have limitations in their physical functioning, many experience changes in psychological states and often have depression. The objective of the current study was to examine the roles of communication with medical professionals, patients’ loneliness, and patients’ depression, in relation to their effects on the patients’ quality of life.

Methods

For 120 patients with MG of 18 years and older, demographic variables, along with communication with medical professionals, loneliness, depression, and quality of life were measured.

Results

As a result, people suffering from MG experienced lower quality of life when their career has changed due to the illness. At the same time, depression was a significant predictor of their quality of life, both in physical and mental domains.

Conclusions

The implications for clinical settings and the suggestions for future research are discussed.