Guillain-BarrÉ syndrome subtype diagnosis: A prospective multicentric European study

Serial electrodiagnostic testing: Utility and indications in adult neurological disorders

Although existing guidelines address electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing in identifying neuromuscular conditions, guidance regarding the uses and limitations of serial (or repeat) EDX testing is limited. By assessing neurophysiological change longitudinally across time, serial electrodiagnosis can clarify a diagnosis and potentially provide valuable prognostic information. This monograph presents four broad indications for serial electrodiagnosis in adult peripheral neurological disorders. First, where clinical change has raised suspicion for a new or ongoing lesion, EDX reassessment for spatial spread of abnormality, involvement of previously normal muscle or nerve, and/or evolving pathophysiology can clarify a diagnosis. Second, where diagnosis of a progressive neuromuscular condition is uncertain, electrophysiological data from a second time point can confirm or refute suspicion. Third, to establish prognosis after a static nerve injury, a repeat study can assess the presence and extent of reinnervation. Finally, faced with a limited initial study (as when complicated by patient or environmental factors), a repeat EDX study can supplement missing or limited data to provide needed clarity. Repeat EDX studies carry certain limitations, however, such as with prognostication in the setting of remote or chronic lesions, sensory predominant fascicular injury, or mild axonal injury. Nevertheless, serial electrodiagnosis remains a valuable and underused tool in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of neuromuscular conditions.

Electrodiagnostic methods to verify Guillain-Barré syndrome subtypes in Istanbul: A prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and electrodiagnostic subtypes of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in Istanbul.

METHODS

Patients with GBS were prospectively recruited between April 2019 and March 2022 and two electrodiagnostic examinations were performed on each patient. The criteria of Ho et al., Hadden et al., Rajabally et al., and Uncini et al. were compared for the differentiation of demyelinating and axonal subtypes, and their relations with anti-ganglioside antibodies were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-seven patients were included, 69 before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (April 2019-February 2020) and 108 during the pandemic (March 2020-March 2022), without substantial changes in monthly frequencies. As compared with the criteria of Uncini et al., demyelinating GBS subtype diagnosis was more frequent according to the Ho et al. and Hadden et al. criteria (95/162, 58.6% vs. 110/174, 63.2% and 121/174, 69.5%, respectively), and less frequent according to Rajabally et al.'s criteria (76/174, 43.7%). Fourteen patients' diagnoses made using Rajabally et al.'s criteria were shifted to the other subtype with the second electrodiagnostic examination. Of the 106 analyzed patients, 22 had immunoglobulin G anti-ganglioside antibodies (14 with the axonal subtype). They had less frequent sensory symptoms (54.5% vs. 83.1%, p = 0.009), a more frequent history of previous gastroenteritis (54.5% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.007), and a more severe disease as compared with those without antibodies.

INTERPRETATION

Serial electrodiagnostic examinations are more helpful for accurate subtype diagnosis of GBS because of the dynamic pathophysiology of the disease. We observed no significant increase in GBS frequency during the pandemic in this metropolis.

Serial Nerve Conduction Studies in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Its Usefulness and Precise Timing

PURPOSE

Nerve conduction study (NCS) is essential for subclassifying Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). It is well known that the GBS subclassification can change through serial NCSs. However, the usefulness of serial NCSs is debatable, especially in patients with early stage GBS.

METHODS

Follow-up NCS data within 3 weeks (early followed NCS, EFN) and within 3 to 10 weeks (late-followed NCS, LFN) were collected from 60 patients with GBS who underwent their first NCS (FN) within 10 days after symptom onset. Each NCS was classified into five subtypes (normal, demyelinating, axonal, inexcitable, and equivocal), according to Hadden's and Rajabally's criteria. We analyzed the frequency of significant changes in classification (SCCs) comprising electrodiagnostic aggravation and subtype shifts between demyelinating and axonal types according to follow-up timing.

RESULTS

Between FN and EFN, 33.3% of patients with Hadden's criteria and 18.3% with Rajabally's criteria showed SCCs. Between FN and LFN, 23.3% of patients with Hadden's criteria and 21.7% with Rajabally's criteria showed SCCs, of which 71.4% (Hadden's criteria) and 46.2% (Rajabally's criteria) already showed SCCs from the EFN. The conditions of delayed SCCs between EFN and LFN were very early FN, mild symptoms at the FN, or persistent electrophysiological deterioration 3 weeks after symptom onset.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients with GBS showed significant changes in neurophysiological classification at the early stage. Serial NCS may be helpful for precise neurophysiological classification. This study suggests that follow-up NCSs should be performed within 3 weeks of symptom onset in patients with GBS in whom FN was performed within 10 days of symptom onset.

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy. Symptoms may vary greatly in presentation and severity. Besides weakness and sensory disturbances, patients may have cranial nerve involvement, respiratory insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction and pain. To develop an evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GBS, using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) constructed 14 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome questions (PICOs) covering diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GBS, which guided the literature search. Data were extracted and summarised in GRADE Summaries of Findings (for treatment PICOs) or Evidence Tables (for diagnostic and prognostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. For the six intervention PICOs, evidence-based recommendations are made. For other PICOs, good practice points (GPPs) are formulated. For diagnosis, the principal GPPs are: GBS is more likely if there is a history of recent diarrhoea or respiratory infection; CSF examination is valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain; electrodiagnostic testing is advised to support the diagnosis; testing for anti-ganglioside antibodies is of limited clinical value in most patients with typical motor-sensory GBS, but anti-GQ1b antibody testing should be considered when Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is suspected; nodal-paranodal antibodies should be tested when autoimmune nodopathy is suspected; MRI or ultrasound imaging should be considered in atypical cases; and changing the diagnosis to acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP) should be considered if progression continues after 8 weeks from onset, which occurs in around 5% of patients initially diagnosed with GBS. For treatment, the TF recommends intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, in patients within 2 weeks (GPP also within 2-4 weeks) after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided, or a course of plasma exchange (PE) 12-15 L in four to five exchanges over 1-2 weeks, in patients within 4 weeks after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided. The TF recommends against a second IVIg course in GBS patients with a poor prognosis; recommends against using oral corticosteroids, and weakly recommends against using IV corticosteroids; does not recommend PE followed immediately by IVIg; weakly recommends gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or carbamazepine for treatment of pain; does not recommend a specific treatment for fatigue. To estimate the prognosis of individual patients, the TF advises using the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) to assess outcome, and the modified Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (mEGRIS) to assess the risk of requiring artificial ventilation. Based on the PICOs, available literature and additional discussions, we provide flow charts to assist making clinical decisions on diagnosis, treatment and the need for intensive care unit admission.

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy. Symptoms may vary greatly in presentation and severity. Besides weakness and sensory disturbances, patients may have cranial nerve involvement, respiratory insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction and pain. To develop an evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GBS, using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) constructed 14 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome questions (PICOs) covering diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GBS, which guided the literature search. Data were extracted and summarised in GRADE Summaries of Findings (for treatment PICOs) or Evidence Tables (for diagnostic and prognostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. For the six intervention PICOs, evidence-based recommendations are made. For other PICOs, good practice points (GPPs) are formulated. For diagnosis, the principal GPPs are: GBS is more likely if there is a history of recent diarrhoea or respiratory infection; CSF examination is valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain; electrodiagnostic testing is advised to support the diagnosis; testing for anti-ganglioside antibodies is of limited clinical value in most patients with typical motor-sensory GBS, but anti-GQ1b antibody testing should be considered when Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is suspected; nodal-paranodal antibodies should be tested when autoimmune nodopathy is suspected; MRI or ultrasound imaging should be considered in atypical cases; and changing the diagnosis to acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP) should be considered if progression continues after 8 weeks from onset, which occurs in around 5% of patients initially diagnosed with GBS. For treatment, the TF recommends intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, in patients within 2 weeks (GPP also within 2-4 weeks) after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided, or a course of plasma exchange (PE) 12-15 L in four to five exchanges over 1-2 weeks, in patients within 4 weeks after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided. The TF recommends against a second IVIg course in GBS patients with a poor prognosis; recommends against using oral corticosteroids, and weakly recommends against using IV corticosteroids; does not recommend PE followed immediately by IVIg; weakly recommends gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or carbamazepine for treatment of pain; does not recommend a specific treatment for fatigue. To estimate the prognosis of individual patients, the TF advises using the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) to assess outcome, and the modified Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (mEGRIS) to assess the risk of requiring artificial ventilation. Based on the PICOs, available literature and additional discussions, we provide flow charts to assist making clinical decisions on diagnosis, treatment and the need for intensive care unit admission.

Dose-Effect Relationship of Motor Nerve Inexcitability on Outcome in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective

One or more inexcitable motor (IM) nerves are common during electrodiagnostic (EDx) study in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This study assessed the dose-effect relationship of IM nerves on outcome in patients with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and acute motor and/or sensory axonal neuropathy (AMAN and AMSAN).

Materials and Methods

Eighty-eight GBS patients admitted during May 2018-June 2023 underwent detailed clinical evaluation and EDx study. Admission and follow-up disability were assessed on a 0-10 Clinical Grading Scale (CGS). Outcome was recovery at 6 months, defined as good (CGS <3) and poor (CGS ≥3). Binary multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination was used to calculate independent predictors of outcome.

Results

Proportion of patients with complete recovery decreased significantly with increasing numbers of IM nerves (P < 0.01). Seventy-six patients were followed for 6 months. Among patients with IM nerves (n = 28), complete recovery was similar between AIDP and axonal GBS (70% vs. 50%, respectively; P = 0.40). However, in patients with recordable compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in all the motor nerves (n = 26), axonal GBS had significantly poor recovery compared to AIDP (75% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.01). Among patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg; n = 42), poor recovery was seen in 53.6% with IM nerves compared to 35.7% without (P = 0.28), while it was 37.5% versus 5.6% (P = 0.04), respectively, in those who did not receive IVIg (n = 34). However, only admission disability (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.97; P = 0.007) was found to be an independent predictor of outcome.

Conclusion

Although increasing numbers of IM nerves were associated with poor outcome on univariate analysis, they did not predict 6 months' outcome independently. Outcome did not differ between axonal GBS and AIDP among those with IM nerves. IVIg improved outcome in patients with IM nerves.

Association between hyperCKemia and axonal degeneration in Guillain-Barré syndrome

BACKGROUND

Elevated serum creatine kinase (CK) levels have been reported in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), more frequently in patients with acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) than in those with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP). However, some patients with AMAN show reversible conduction failure (RCF), characterized by rapid recovery without axonal degeneration. The present study tested the hypothesis that hyperCKemia is associated with axonal degeneration in GBS, regardless of the subtype.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 54 patients with AIDP or AMAN whose serum CK levels were measured within 4 weeks from symptom onset between January 2011 and January 2021. We divided them into hyperCKemia (serum CK ≥ 200 IU/L) and normal CK (serum CK < 200 IU/L) groups. Patients were further classified into axonal degeneration and RCF groups based on more than two nerve conduction studies. The clinical features and frequency of axonal degeneration and RCF were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics were similar in the hyperCKemia and normal CK groups. Compared with that in the RCF subgroup, the frequency of hyperCKemia was significantly higher in the axonal degeneration group (p = 0.007). Patients with normal serum CK levels showed better clinical prognosis, evaluated by the Hughes score at 6 months from admission (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

HyperCKemia is associated with axonal degeneration in GBS, regardless of the electrophysiological subtype. HyperCKemia within 4 weeks from symptom onset might be a marker of axonal degeneration and poor prognosis in GBS. Serial nerve conduction studies and serum CK measurements will help clinicians understand the pathophysiology of GBS.

Sural-sparing pattern: A study against electrodiagnostic subtypes of Guillain–Barre syndrome

•

This study investigated sural-sparing in GBS patients who underwent extensive sensory NCS protocol.

•

Sural-sparing was less obvious in axonal than demyelinating GBS based on the number of affected upper-limb SNAPs.

•

Extended sensory NCS (bilateral or serial) is worth detecting sural-sparing as a supportive EDX feature of GBS.

Objective

To study sural-sparing pattern in Guillain–Barre syndrome (GBS) and compare it among GBS’s electrodiagnostic subtypes, classified by two recent criteria.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed clinical data and electrodiagnostic studies (EDXs) of 88 GBS patients diagnosed in a tertiary care hospital (2010–2019).

Results

Overall, 79/88 (89.8%) and 36/45 (80%) patients had bilateral sensory nerve conduction studies (NCS) in the first EDX and follow-up EDX, respectively. Sural-sparing occurred in all subtypes (50% overall occurrence rate), most commonly in demyelination. There was no statistically significant difference in sural-sparing occurrence rates between demyelinating and axonal GBS; however, sural-sparing in axonal GBS tended to show a lower number of abnormal upper-limb sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) than demyelinating GBS. Shifting between sural-sparing and no sural-sparing occurred in approximately-one-fourth of patients receiving serial studies. Follow-up EDX additionally discovered 20% of all sural-sparing. Unilateral EDX could have omitted up to 30% of sural-sparing.

Conclusions

Sural-sparing is less obviously manifested in axonal than demyelinating GBS, with respect to the number of affected upper-limb SNAPs. Extended sensory NCS is worth in detecting sural-sparing as a supportive electrodiagnostic GBS feature.

Significance

This report showed one different character of sural-sparing (number of affected upper-limb SNAPs) between demyelinating and axonal GBS.

Electrodiagnostic subtyping in Guillain-Barré syndrome: Use of criteria in practice based on a survey study in IGOS

Electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies are helpful in diagnosing and subtyping of Guillain‐Barré syndrome (GBS). Published criteria for differentiation into GBS subtypes focus on cutoff values, but other items receive less attention, although they may influence EDx subtyping: (a) extensiveness of EDx testing, (b) nerve‐specific considerations, (c) distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP)‐amplitude requirements, (d) criteria for conduction block and temporal dispersion. The aims of this study were to investigate how these aspects were approached by neuromuscular EDx experts in practice and how this was done in previously published EDx criteria for GBS. A completed questionnaire was returned by 24 (of 49) members of the electrophysiology expertise group from the International GBS Outcome Study. Six published EDx criteria for GBS subtyping were compared regarding these aspects. The indicated minimal number of motor nerves to study varied among respondents and tended to be more extensive in equivocal than normal studies. Respondents varied considerably regarding usage of compression sites for subtyping (median/wrist, ulnar/elbow, peroneal/fibular head): 29% used all variables from all sites, 13% excluded all sites, and 58% used only some sites and/or variables. Thirty‐eight percent of respondents required a minimal distal CMAP amplitude to classify distal motor latency as demyelinating, and 58% did for motor conduction velocity. For proximal/distal CMAP‐amplitude ratio and F‐wave latency, a requisite minimal CMAP amplitude was more often required (79%). Also, the various published criteria sets showed differences on all items. Practical use of EDx criteria for subtyping GBS vary extensively across respondents, potentially lowering the reproducibility of GBS subtyping.

SARS-CoV-2-associated Guillain-Barré syndrome in four patients: what do we know about pathophysiology?

Background

A growing number of Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) and Miller Fisher Syndrome (MFS) cases following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are reported. Nevertheless, this association is still debated, and pathophysiology remains unclear.

Methods

Between April and December 2020, in three hospitals located in Brussels, Belgium, we examined four patients with GBS following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results

 Neurological onset occurred 3 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 symptoms in all patients. Three patients presented with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and had negative anti-ganglioside testing: two suffered from a severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and had good clinical outcome after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment; one with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection had spontaneously favorable evolution without treatment. The fourth patient had critical SARS-CoV-2 infection and presented acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) with clinical features highly suggestive of brainstem involvement, as well as positive anti-ganglioside antibodies (anti-GD1b IgG) and had partial improvement after IVIG.

Conclusions

We report four cases of SARS-CoV-2-associated GBS. The interval of 3 weeks between SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and neurological onset, the clinical improvement after IVIG administration, and the presence of positive anti-ganglioside antibodies in one patient further support the hypothesis of an immune-mediated post-infectious process. Systematic extensive antibody testing might help for a better understanding of physiopathology.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13760-021-01787-y.

Immunoglobulin and Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute autoimmune polyradiculoneuropathy affecting 1-2 subjects per 100,000 every year worldwide. It causes, in its classic form, symmetric weakness in the proximal and distal limb muscles with common involvement of the cranial nerves, particularly facial weakness. Respiratory function is compromised in a case in four. Randomised controlled trials have demonstrated the benefit of therapeutic plasma exchange in hastening time to recovery. Intravenous immunoglobulin was subsequently shown to be as efficacious as plasma exchange in adult subjects. In children, few trials have shown the benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin versus supportive care. Pharmacokinetic studies suggested a relationship between increase in immunoglobulin G level post-infusion and outcome, implying administration of larger doses may be beneficial in subjects with poor prognosis. However, a subsequent trial of a second dose of immunoglobulin in such subjects failed to show improved outcome, while demonstrating a higher risk of thromboembolic side-effects. Monoclonal antibody therapy has more recently been investigated for GBS, after multiple studies in animal models, with different agents and variable postulated mechanisms of action. Eculizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody against the complement protein C5, was tested in in two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trials. Neither showed benefit versus immunoglobulins alone on disability level at 4 weeks, although one study importantly suggested possible, clinically highly relevant, late effects on normalising function. A phase 3 trial is in progress. Preliminary results of a placebo-controlled ongoing study of ANX005, a humanised recombinant antibody against C1q inhibiting the complement cascade, have been promising.

Toscana virus associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome: a case-control study

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute-onset, immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy, often precipitated by an antecedent infection. An association of GBS with vector-borne viral infections has been suggested, with evidence for the involvement of Zika, Dengue, Chikungunya and West Nile virus (WNV). This prospective case-control study was conducted to identify vector-borne viral infections in GBS. Thirteen individuals newly diagnosed as GBS were enrolled. Disease severity, prognostic factors and nerve conduction patterns were assessed. Eleven individuals with non-infectious conditions requiring cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis were included as controls. Plasma, CSF and urine specimens were evaluated via nucleic acid amplification assays aimed to detect a broad spectrum of viruses. WNV and Toscana virus (TOSV) IgM/IgG antibodies were screened using commercial immunofluorescence assays and confirmed via virus neutralization tests (VNT). Partial TOSV nucleocapsid and genotype 1 polymerase sequences were detected in CSF of a patient with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Two control subjects had VNT-confirmed TOSV IgM in plasma. VNT-confirmed WNV and TOSV IgG were detected in 15.4% and 61.5% of GBS patients, respectively. Variations in WNV IgG and TOSV IgM detection rates were not statistically significant among study cohorts. However, TOSV IgG was significantly more frequent in GBS patients. No difference was observed for disease form or prognostic scores for virus markers. Follow-up serological profiles were identical to the initial findings. We have identified TOSV as a potential precipitating agent in GBS, with some rare clinical presentations of symptomatic TOSV infections.

Changes in motor nerve excitability in acute phase Guillain-Barré syndrome

BACKGROUND

The most common subtypes of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) are acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN). In the first days after the onset of weakness, standard nerve conduction studies (NCS) may not distinguish GBS subtypes. Reduced nerve excitability may be an early symptom of nerve dysfunction, which can be determined with the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan. The aim of this study was to explore whether early changes in motor nerve excitability in GBS patients are related to various subtypes.

METHODS

Prospective case-control study in 19 GBS patients from The Netherlands and 22 from Bangladesh. CMAP scans were performed within 2 days of hospital admission and NCS 7-14 days after onset of weakness. CMAP scans were also performed in age- and country-matched controls.

RESULTS

CMAP scan patterns of patients who were classified as AMAN were distinctly different compared to the CMAP scan patterns of the patients who were classified as AIDP. The most pronounced differences were found in the stimulus intensity parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

CMAP scans made at hospital admission demonstrate several characteristics that can be used as an early indicator of GBS subtype.

Acute Axonal Motor Neuropathy With Completely Reversible Conduction Failure-Is It Really Axonal?

ABSTRACT

We present the case of a 24-year-old man with a 3-day history of limb weakness and flaccid tetraparesis, hyporreflexia, and gait difficulties (Hughes grade 3) in the examination. Electromyography at presentation revealed severe amplitude reduction in distal compound muscle action potentials of several nerves without features of demyelination, fulfilling electrodiagnostic criteria for acute axonal motor neuropathy. The patient was treated with immunoglobulin and recovered completely 21 days after symptom onset. Electromyography at this timepoint showed normalization of compound muscle action potentials without increased temporal dispersion. The electroclinical recovery profile in this patient is consistent with reversible conduction failure in distal nerve segments in detriment of axonal degeneration. Thus, it is an "axonal motor neuropathy" where axonopathy is unlikely, giving strength to the concept of "nodopathies/paranodopathies."

Nerve conduction studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome: Influence of timing and value of repeated measurements

OBJECTIVE

Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are essential to differentiate between demyelinating and axonal subtypes in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). However, it is debated to which extent the delay of NCS after symptom onset and repeated measurements during the disease course influence the diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

We evaluated NCS in 93 patients with a classical GBS applying two widely used criteria (Hadden's and Rajabally's). The initial measurements after symptom onset were compared to follow-up studies where available (n = 43). We analyzed the influence of NCS timing after symptom onset and clinical severity on fulfilling the electrophysiological criteria for axonal or demyelinating subtypes and evaluated the impact of repeated measurements. We further evaluated the presence of reversible conduction failure.

RESULTS

A higher GBS disability scale at nadir correlated with a successful subclassification whereas the delay of the first NCS after symptom onset did not influence the diagnostic yield (75% for Hadden's and 68% for Rajabally's criteria for the first assessment). A second measurement allowed the additional successful classification in 19% and 14% of patients, respectively. On the other hand, a repeated measurement in patients with an initial successful classification resulted in a different subtype in 5% and 7%, respectively. Reversible conduction failure was found in 7% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Clinical severity but not timing of NCS influenced the fulfilment of electrophysiological criteria for either the axonal or demyelinating subtype. Repeated electrophysiological measurements led to a further specification or a change in subtype classification in a relevant proportion of patients.

Nodal conduction block: A unifying concept

A newly introduced term, "axonal conduction block," brought a confusion in the electrodiagnostic diagnosis of Guillain-Barrè syndrome (GBS). I am proposing the term "nodal conduction block" for "axonal conduction block." This unifying concept of nodal conduction block will accommodate both the traditional concept of demyelination as well as the new concept of nodopathy in the "axonal form of GBS,", making the practice of electrodiagnosis much easier.

Diagnosis and management of Guillain-Barré syndrome in ten steps

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare, but potentially fatal, immune-mediated disease of the peripheral nerves and nerve roots that is usually triggered by infections. The incidence of GBS can therefore increase during outbreaks of infectious diseases, as was seen during the Zika virus epidemics in 2013 in French Polynesia and 2015 in Latin America. Diagnosis and management of GBS can be complicated as its clinical presentation and disease course are heterogeneous, and no international clinical guidelines are currently available. To support clinicians, especially in the context of an outbreak, we have developed a globally applicable guideline for the diagnosis and management of GBS. The guideline is based on current literature and expert consensus, and has a ten-step structure to facilitate its use in clinical practice. We first provide an introduction to the diagnostic criteria, clinical variants and differential diagnoses of GBS. The ten steps then cover early recognition and diagnosis of GBS, admission to the intensive care unit, treatment indication and selection, monitoring and treatment of disease progression, prediction of clinical course and outcome, and management of complications and sequelae.

Rapid Recovery With Plasma Exchange in Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy With Reversible Conduction Failure

Characterization of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) subtypes has become increasingly complicated with the recognition of paranodal dysfunction and reversible conduction failure (RCF) in acute motor axonal neuropathy. We describe 2 cases of seronegative acute motor axonal neuropathy with RCF with a rapid onset of severe quadriplegia. Treatment with plasma exchange was associated with rapid clinical and electrophysiological response on serial examinations. Increased recognition of RCF may lead to improved characterization of GBS subtypes and may play a role in determining future treatment options in GBS.

Advances in management of Guillain-Barré syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The clinical presentation of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is highly variable, which can make the diagnosis challenging. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange are the cornerstones of treatment since decades. But despite these treatments, 25% initially progress in muscle weakness, 25% require artificial ventilation, 20% is still not able to walk independently after 6 months, and 2-5% die, emphasizing the need for better treatment. We summarize new developments regarding the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of GBS.

RECENT FINDINGS

GBS is a clinical diagnosis that can be supported by cerebrospinal fluid examination and nerve conduction studies. Nerve ultrasound and MRI are potentially useful techniques to diagnose inflammatory neuropathies. Several novel infections have recently been associated to GBS. Evidence from experimental studies and recent phase 2 clinical trials suggests that complement inhibition combined with IVIg might improve outcome in GBS, but further studies are warranted. Prognostic models could guide the selection of patients with a relatively poor prognosis that might benefit most from additional IVIg or otherwise intensified treatment.

SUMMARY

New diagnostic tools may help to have early and accurate diagnosis in difficult GBS cases. Increased knowledge on the pathophysiology of GBS forms the basis for development of new, targeted, and personalized treatments that hopefully improve outcome.

The electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome subtypes: Where do we stand?

It is controversial as to whether the electrophysiological Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) subtypes can be diagnosed on the basis of a single study and which criteria sets and cut-offs should be used. Serial electrophysiologic studies have shown that a significant number of patients changed electrodiagnostic subtype largely because of the recognition of reversible conduction failure as a possible evidence of axonal pathology. However, other reports concluded that electrodiagnosis can be made by a single study, the subtypes depending on the characteristic of the criteria set applied. Such divergent views, although explicable by the different methodology employed, can be confusing in the everyday practice. We argue that the pathophysiology of GBS is dynamic and that serial studies allow a more accurate diagnosis of subtypes. A second study, although not always practicable, is recommended in patients showing no clear demyelinating features, low amplitude distal compound muscle action potentials or conduction block without temporal dispersion. For practical purposes, we propose that at a first study Uncini's or Rajabally's criteria sets can be employed for an indicative subtype diagnosis. Finally, although the GBS subtype diagnosis has currently no impact on treatment, we believe that is important for understanding the underlying pathophysiology and prognostication.