Seven-year efficacy and safety outcomes of Bulkamid for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

The Extended Utilization of Bulking Agents in Pediatric Urology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traditional surgical management for urinary incontinence and vesicoureteral reflux often requires complex reconstructive surgery and extended hospitalizations. Since the introduction of endoscopic bulking agents in 1973, there has been increasing interest in the use of endoscopic injection (EI) and bulking for the treatment of a variety of pediatric urologic disorders. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent literature addressing the use of bulking agents in pediatric urology.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most recent literature has focused primarily on the use of EI of bulking agents at the bladder neck for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Other uses of EI of bulking agents has focused on the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in patients with anatomic abnormalities or treatment of incontinence catheterizable channels. The development of advanced techniques for endoscopic injection along with safe, stable bulking agents has allowed for the treatment of a variety of urologic conditions. This minimally invasive procedure offers an additional tool for the pediatric urologist's armamentarium in the treatment of urinary incontinence and VUR.

Macroplastique Is a Safe and Effective Long-term Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Prospective Study with 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Until a few years ago, a midurethral sling was considered the gold standard for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after failure of conservative therapies. However, criticisms regarding the rate of mesh exposure and lack of long-term efficacy have led to reconsideration of other surgical procedures. Our aim was to investigate long-term subjective and objective outcomes after injection of Macroplastique, a urethral bulking agent.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled all consecutive women complaining of pure SUI symptoms with urodynamically proven SUI who received a Macroplastique injection. We investigated patient-reported subjective outcomes using International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, Urogenital Distress Inventory, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaires, and the cough stress test to assess objective outcomes. Adverse events were recorded during follow-up.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

At 10 yr after Macroplastique injection, the objective cure rate was 56% and 71% of patients reported that they were satisfied. Long-term data revealed no significant decline in subjective or objective cure rates. No serious complications were reported. Study limitations include the small sample size and the lack of pad tests and bladder diaries for postoperative evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our study shows that Macroplastique injection can be an effective and safe option for the treatment of female SUI in the long term, even when used in the first-line setting.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We evaluated outcomes for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who were treated with an injection of Macroplastique gel into the wall of the urethra to prevent leakage of urine. We found that this is a safe option for treatment of female SUI that is effective in the long term.

Urethral Bulking

OBJECTIVE

This Clinical Practice Statement aims to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance for the use of urethral bulking agents (UBAs) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS

We conducted a structured search of the English literature published from January 1960 to November 2022. Search terms identified studies of both current and historic UBAs. Data extracted at the time of full-text review included type of study, research setting, number of participants, age group, bulking agent, primary outcome, secondary outcome, efficacy, and complications.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred ninety-four nonduplicate articles were identified using the search criteria. After limiting the article types to randomized control led trials, prospective studies, guideline documents, reviews, meta-analyses, and case reports of complications, 395 studies were screened.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, we propose the following recommendations for clinicians when considering UBA: First, UBA is indicated in cases of demonstrable SUI. Intrinsic sphincter deficiency is not predictive of patient outcomes. Second, patients should be counseled on the risks, lack of long-term efficacy data, potential need for repeat injections, possible need for surgery for recurrent SUI, implications for future procedures, and pelvic imaging findings that may be observed after UBA. Third, UBA may be considered for initial management of SUI. Fourth, UBA is an option for patients with persistent or recurrent SUI after a sling procedure. Fifth, clinicians may prioritize UBA over surgery in specific patient populations. Sixth, polyacrylamide hydrogel demonstrates marginally improved safety and durability data over other available agents.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Prospective Comparative Analysis between Bulking Agent and Single-Incision Sling

INTRODUCTION

The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of bulking agents and single-incision slings in the treatment of urinary incontinence in 159 patients during a 29-month follow-up period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of the 159 patients suffering from stress urinary incontinence, 64 were treated with bulking agents (PAHG Bulkamid®) and 75 with a single-incision sling (Altis®). The ICIQ-UI-SF (Incontinence Questionnaire-Urine Incontinence-Short Form), PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaires short form), FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index), FSDS (Female Sexual Distress Scale), and PGI-I (Patient Global Improvement Index) were used to assess efficiency and quality of life.

RESULTS

The bulking agents showed high efficacy and safety during the 29-month follow-up. Post-operative complications were recorded in both groups, with only two significant differences. The Bulkamid group experienced no pain, while 10.8% of the ALTIS group experienced groin pain and 5% experienced de novo urgency. Furthermore, patients treated with bulking agents experienced reduced nicturia (0.78 vs. 0.92 in patients treated with single-incision slings.). In both groups, we noticed a significant improvement in QoL (quality of life), with a halved ICIQ-UI-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urine Incontinence-Short Form) score which was completed to assess the impact of urine symptoms. After 24 months of therapy, the Bulkamid group saw a decrease from 14.58 ± 5.11 at baseline to 5.67 ± 1.90 (p < 0.0001), whereas the ALTIS group experience a decrease from 13.75 ± 5.89 to 5.83 ± 1.78. Similarly, we observed an improvement in sexual function, with the number of sexually active patients increasing from 29 to 44 (56.4%) in the Bulkamid group (p = 0.041) and from 31 to 51 (61.7%) in the ALTIS group (p = 0.034). According to the most recent statistics, the PISQ-12, FSFI, and FSDS scores all demonstrated an improvement in women's sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of efficacy and safety, bulking agents had notable results over the 29-month follow-up period. Furthermore, the patients treated with bulking agents reported a lower incidence of postoperative complications and a no discernible difference in terms of quality of life and sexual activity compared to the ones treated with single-incision slings. Bulking agents can be considered a very reliable therapeutic option based on accurate patient selection.

Reconstruction of Urethral Sphincter With Polyacrylamide Hydrogel

IMPORTANCE

Urethral bulking is an alternative to synthetic midurethral sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. Urethral bulking agents, which are injected in the submucosal tissues of the proximal urethra/bladder neck, have demonstrated less adverse effects with similar satisfaction rates but lower subjective and objective cure rates when compared with midurethral sling. Cystoscopic Reconstruction of External Sphincter Technique (CREST) is a novel technique, which reinforces the natural closure mechanism of the external urinary sphincter (EUS).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to provide safety and efficacy data for injecting polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG) in the components of the female EUS.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective chart review of patients using CREST with PAHG as initial treatment for SUI by a single surgeon from January 2022 to October 2022. Exclusion criteria are as follows: younger than 18 years, prior SUI surgery, concomitant pelvic organ prolapse or reconstructive procedure, neurological conditions, or history of radiation. Subjective and objective cure rates were measured by patient-reported symptoms and cough stress test. Urinary retention, postoperative urinary infection, and de novo urinary urgency were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients met inclusion criteria with median follow-up of 3 months. Eighty-five percent of participants reported subjective improvement, 69% reported subjective cure, and 69% demonstrated objective cure. Nine patients reported transient postoperative retention, 8 reported postoperative urinary tract infections, and 5 reported de novo urgency. There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

CREST is a novel technique for injection of PAHG, into the EUS to treat SUI. Our data suggest that this technique could improve urethral injection outcomes with minimal complications.

Current Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence by Bulking Agents and Laser Therapy-An Update

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects around 20% of women. In addition to the established suburethral sling insertion, two less invasive approaches are of interest today: urethral bulking agents and vaginal laser therapy. This review discusses articles through December 2023 identified by a PubMed literature search using the keywords "incontinence" and "bulking" or "laser". Although the two approaches are less effective than sling insertions, there are specific conditions in which one or the other technique is more advantageous. Injecting bulking agents into the urethra only takes some minutes and works without general anesthesia. The method is particularly suited for elderly, frail, or obese patients with multiple comorbidities, but is also applicable for all patients and in combination with other therapies. Generally, the safety profile is good but differs between bulking materials. Two laser types-the Erbium:YAG laser with SMOOTH-mode and the fractional ablative CO2 laser-deliver heat into the tissue to induce tissue tightening and regeneration. Intravaginal laser therapy improves mild to moderate SUI, while studies describe how intraurethral laser therapy is also beneficial for severe SUI. Young women between childbirths, as well as postmenopausal women, may benefit from laser therapy. The method is safe, can be performed on an outpatient basis, and does not require any artificial material.

Management of mixed urinary incontinence: IUGA committee opinion

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is defined by the International Urogynecology Association (IUGA) and International Continence Society as the complaint of involuntary leakage of urine associated with urgency and also with exertion, effort, sneezing or coughing. It therefore implies the coexistence of both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). MUI is a heterogeneous diagnosis that requires an assessment of its individual components of SUI and UUI. Management requires an individualised approach to the symptom components. The aim of this review is to identify the assessment/investigations and management options for MUI.

METHODS

A working subcommittee from the IUGA Research & Development (R&D) Committee was created and volunteers invited from the IUGA membership. A literature review was performed to provide guidance focused on the recommended assessment and management of MUI. The document was then evaluated by the entire IUGA R&D Committee and IUGA Board of Directors and revisions made. The final document represents the IUGA R&D Committee Opinion.

RESULTS

The R&D Committee MUI opinion paper provides guidance on the assessment and management of women with MUI and summarises the evidence-based recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed urinary incontinence is a complex problem and successful management requires alleviation of both the stress and urge components. Care should be individualised based on patient preferences. Further research is needed to guide patients in setting goals and to determine which component of MUI to treat first. The evidence for many of the surgical/procedural treatment options for MUI are limited and needs to be explored in more detail.

Urethral Bulkamid® injection after failed midurethral sling: a step-by-step video

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Bulking agents are a minimally invasive treatment option for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Recurrent SUI is a major challenge for most clinicians because there is little evidence in the literature on the best option after midurethral sling (MUS) failure.

METHODS

Bulkamid® (Contura International A/S), a urethral bulking agent, is a homogenous gel without particles, consisting of a polyacrylamide hydrogel that is nonbiodegradable.

RESULTS

In this video case report, we demonstrate the Bulkamid® injection procedure. This procedure can be carried out as an office-based procedure under local anesthesia, with no down time and only minor possible complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We consider it a valid option for patients with recurrent or persistent SUI after failed MUS surgery.

SUI in postmenopausal women: advantages of an intraurethral + intravaginal Er:YAG laser

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of concomitant application of an intraurethral (IU) + intravaginal (IV) non-ablative Erbium (Er):YAG laser with IV application in improving the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.

METHODS

This observational retrospective cohort study included 122 patients with SUI, 60 women in the IU + IV laser arm and 62 in the IV laser arm. The primary outcome was the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form score at entry and at 3, 6 and 12 months from baseline.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were comparable in both arms. Significant improvement in SUI symptoms was seen 3 months after the intervention and was sustained until the end of month 12 in both arms. The women who had severe SUI symptoms initially showed greater improvement. A higher number of women who initially had mild to moderate SUI symptoms were dry after treatment. Patients treated with IU + IV Er:YAG laser showed significant improvement in SUI symptoms compared to IV laser only, especially at postmenopausal state (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The Er:YAG laser appears to be an efficient treatment method for SUI. Concomitant application of an IU + IV Er:YAG laser is more effective in relieving SUI symptoms at postmenopausal state.

Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Unsolved Clinical Challenge

Stress urinary incontinence is still a frequent problem for women and men, which leads to pronounced impairment of the quality of life and withdrawal from the social environment. Modern diagnostics and therapy improved the situation for individuals affected. But there are still limits, including the correct diagnosis of incontinence and its pathophysiology, as well as the therapeutic algorithms. In most cases, patients are treated with a first-line regimen of drugs, possibly in combination with specific exercises and electrophysiological stimulation. When conservative options are exhausted, minimally invasive surgical therapies are indicated. However, standard surgeries, especially the application of implants, do not pursue any causal therapy. Non-absorbable meshes and ligaments have fallen into disrepute due to complications. In numerous countries, classic techniques such as colposuspension have been revived to avoid implants. Except for tapes in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women, the literature on randomized controlled studies is insufficient. This review provides an update on pharmacological and surgical treatment options for stress urinary incontinence; it highlights limitations and formulates wishes for the future from a clinical perspective.

A levator ani midurethral support via single vaginal incision technique to treat stress urinary incontinence: A case report

Stress urinary incontinence affects more than one-fourth of adult women. The recommended surgical treatment involves the use of a synthetic mesh sling. Upon unsuccessful treatment using a mesh sling or when patients decline mesh, surgical treatments, including an autologous fascia sling, colposuspension, or bulking injections, are used. After unsuccessful treatment using three mesh slings, an autologous fascia sling, and a midurethral bulking agent, a patient was successfully treated with our modified Kelly plication technique. A 51-year-old woman with recurrent stress urinary incontinence had had three previous mesh midurethral sling exposures with complete mesh removals followed by one autologous fascia sling with severe infection. We initially treated her with a set of urethral bulking injections, which was also unsuccessful. She was successfully treated with our modified Kelly plication technique, which plicates levator ani muscles to support the midurethral instead of plicating the vesicovaginal fascia at the bladder neck. The patient remained continent four years after the performance of this technique and had reported no pelvic pain or dyspareunia. The technique is detailed in this paper. This single vaginal incision native tissue technique may be considered when mesh slings or alternative native tissue procedures are not feasible for patients, as in this case.

A Clinical Learning Curve Study of Polydimethylsiloxane Urolastic for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Does Safety Improve when Expertise Grow?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to characterize the learning curve of bulk injection therapy polydimethylsiloxane Urolastic (PDMS-U) for stress urinary incontinence.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis from three clinical studies on efficacy and safety outcomes of PDMS-U was performed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

PDMS-U-certified physicians who performed ≥4 procedures were included. The primary outcome was the number of PDMS-U procedures needed to achieve acceptable failure rates for "complications overall," "urinary retention," and "excision," using the LC-CUSUM method. For the primary outcome, physicians who performed ≥20 procedures were used. For the secondary outcome, logistic and linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between number of procedures, complications (complications overall, urinary retention, pain, exposure, excision of PDSM-U), and duration of treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 203 PDMS-U procedures were performed by nine physicians. Five physicians were used for the primary outcome. For "complications overall," "urinary retention," and "excision," two physicians reached a level of competence: one at procedure 20 and one at procedure 40. The secondary outcome showed no statistically significant association between procedure number and complications. There was a statistically significant increase in the duration of treatment with more physician experience (mean difference 0.83 min per 10 additional procedures, 95% CI: 0.16-1.48).

LIMITATIONS

One limitation is that retrospectively collected data might have underreported the number of complications. Secondly, there was variation in the way the technique was applied between physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians' experience in the PDMS-U procedure did not influence safety outcomes. There was large inter-physician variability and most physicians did not reach acceptable failure rates. There was no relationship between PDMS-U complications and the number of performed procedures.

Update on Urethral Bulking for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urethral bulking agents are an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence in select females. The material and techniques used for urethral bulking are constantly evolving. With the introduction of several new agents, there is an ongoing debate over which agent is the most effective, durable, and safe.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current available bulking agents include Bulkamid®, Macroplastiue®, Durasphere®, Coaptite®, or Urolastic®. Each of these agents has its own biophysical properties that affect its efficacy and safety. Evidence evaluating bulking agents has increased over time but there is no definitive data that suggest superiority of one agent over another. The ideal urethral bulking agent for female stress incontinence has yet been identified. Currently available agents have acceptable short-term and medium-term efficacy with few adverse events.

Mortality and Reoperation Following Midurethral Sling Versus Urethral Bulking in Older Women

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in mortality, retreatment rates, and comorbidities that may be risk factors for retreatment among Medicare beneficiaries (age 65+) undergoing midurethral sling vs urethral bulking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the 5% limited data set from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services between 2010 and 2018. Beneficiaries age 65 or older who underwent sling or bulking without concomitant surgery from 2011 to 2014 were included and followed until reoperation or retreatment, loss of Medicare, death, or December 31, 2018. Repeat procedures for ongoing stress incontinence or complication were included. Associations between index treatment and need for a secondary procedure were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 5.7 years for 1,700 patients undergoing sling and 5.2 years for 875 patients undergoing bulking. Within 5 years, 10.2% of sling patients and 23.2% of bulking patients had died. When controlling for age, race, and comorbidities, bulking patients were 1.73 times more likely than sling patients to die during the study period. Bulking patients were significantly more likely to have 12 of the 16 of the medical comorbidities evaluated. By 5 years, 6.7% of sling patients had been retreated for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared with 24.6% of bulking patients. Apart from hypertension, none of the comorbidities evaluated was associated with a difference in the risk of a subsequent surgical procedure. Members of racial and ethnic minority groups were less likely to be retreated.

CONCLUSION

Older adults undergoing bulking are notably sicker and have shorter life expectancy as compared with those undergoing sling, suggesting these factors heavily guide patient selection. Comorbidities do not predispose patients to reoperation or retreatment.

Efficacy and safety of electrical stimulation for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the safety and short- and long-term efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted up to 2020. Studies comparing ES with sham ES or no intervention were included. Standardized mean differences (SMDs), weighted mean differences (WMDs), relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

This study included 9 RCTs, involving a total of 982 patients, of whom 520 received ES. Our results showed that in the short term (< 3 months), compared with sham ES or no intervention, ES significantly improved incontinence-specific quality of life (IQOL) (p = 0.003; SMD = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.50]; I2 = 88%) and reduced urine leakage (p < 0.00001; WMD = -6.15 [95% CI, -8.29 to -4.01]; I2 = 0%) but did not significantly reduce the frequency of incontinence episodes (p = 0.34; WMD = -0.98 [95% CI, -2.99 to 1.04]; I2 = 85%). In the long term (3-7.5 months), ES significantly improved IQOL (p = 0.0009; SMD = 1.14 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.81]; I2 = 91%) and reduced the frequency of incontinence episodes (p = 0.0009; WMD = -2.45 [95% CI, -3.90 to -1.01]; I2 = 79%) but did not significantly reduce urine leakage (p = 0.27; WMD = -9.21 [95% CI, -25.57 to 7.14]; I2 = 71%). There was no significant difference in adverse events between ES and sham ES or no intervention (p = 0.36; RR = 1.34 [95% CI, 0.72 to 2.50]; I2 = 0%). A test for subgroup differences showed that electroacupuncture (EA) improved long-term IQOL to a greater extent than vaginal ES (VES), whereas there was no significant difference in efficacy between EA and VES in short- or long-term reduction of urine leakage, frequency of incontinence episodes, or short-term IQOL improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

ES may improve short- and long-term IQOL for women with SUI, but it appears to provide only short-term reduction in urine leakage and long-term reduction in frequency of incontinence episodes. However, we cannot draw any conclusion on the safety between ES and sham ES or no intervention because of the rarity of adverse events. It is still uncertain whether EA is comparable or superior to VES owing to an insufficient number of studies and patients. The conclusions should be considered carefully because of the limited quality and quantity of the RCTs included. Further rigorous RCTs with adequate sample sizes and long follow-up are necessary to fully validate our findings.

Comparing risk of repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence after mid-urethral slings and polyacrylamide hydrogel

INTRODUCTION

Over the last two decades synthetic mid-urethral slings (MUS) have become established as the main surgical method for correcting stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, transurethral injections with polyacrylamide hydrogel are gaining popularity. We used surgical codes from a national registry to explore potential differences in risk of later surgery for SUI comparing retropubic slings, obturator slings, and polyacrylamide hydrogel injections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cohort study used surgical codes from The Norwegian Patient Registry. All women recorded as having had surgery for SUI coded as retropubic sling, obturator sling, or polyacrylamide hydrogel injection from 2008 until end-of-study censoring in 2017, were included. Main outcome was time to any recorded new SUI procedure later in the study period. Unadjusted comparison between groups was done using Kaplan-Meier. A Cox regression analysis was then performed to adjust for hospital unit size and patient age at surgery.

RESULTS

The unadjusted analyses showed significant differences between the chosen index method and the risk of later SUI surgery favoring retropubic slings (p < 0.01). The proportions of patients without any recorded new SUI procedure at 1 and 5 years were 99.3% and 97.7% for retropubic MUS, 98.7% and 96.1% for obturator MUS, and 82.7% and 72.4% for polyacrylamide hydrogel injections. The majority of women having a repeat procedure for SUI after a polyacrylamide hydrogel injection underwent repeat treatment within 1 year (63%). After adjusting for age at time of surgery and hospital size, obturator slings (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.4) and polyacrylamide hydrogel (hazard ratio 23.1, 95% CI 17.6-30.3) remained associated with a higher risk of later incontinence surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Both retropubic and obturator slings have low long-term risks of repeat incontinence surgery compared with polyacrylamide hydrogel injections. Retropubic slings were found to have superior longevity of the surgical result.

Combination therapy with botulinum toxin and bulking agent-An efficient, sustainable, and safe method to treat elderly women with mixed urinary incontinence

Aims

To evaluate the efficacy, sustainability and safety of combined botulinum toxin and polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG) therapy to treat urgency and stress components of therapy‐refractory mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) in an elderly study population.

Methods

Fifty‐five women with therapy‐refractory MUI were treated with botulinum toxin and PAHG in one surgical procedure. Urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) outcomes were separately assessed after 4 and 12 months by objective UUI episodes/24 h and cough test, subjective impact of UUI and SUI on quality of life, and subjective International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ‐UI SF). MUI outcome was calculated by combining UUI and SUI outcomes. Complications were monitored throughout the study.

Results

At 4 months, objective cure rates were 73%, 53%, and 42%, and subjective cure rates were 71%, 52%, and 50% for SUI, UUI, and MUI. At 12 months, objective cure rates were 73%, 56%, 50% and subjective cure rates were 78%, 42%, and 40% for SUI, UUI, and MUI. The ICIQ‐UI SF score decreased by 9.0 and 8.7 points after 4 and 12 months. All complications were transient and included 22% clean intermittent catheterization immediately after surgery, 33% postvoid residual volumes >100 ml at 14 days, and 13% symptomatic urinary tract infection within the first postoperative month.

Conclusions

The combination of botulinum toxin and PAHG is effective, sustainable and safe to treat therapy‐refractory MUI, even in an elderly and frail study population. Patients benefit from the short surgical procedure without the need for general anaesthesia or discontinuation of anticoagulation.