Psychometric properties of the Persian version of neurogenic bladder symptom score questionnaire: A methodological study on patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke

Clinical tools for evaluating the severity of overactive bladder: A systematic review of psychometric properties

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the evidence describing the psychometric properties of clinical measures for assessing overactive bladder symptoms (urinary urgency with or without urge urinary incontinence, urinary frequency and nocturia). To evaluate the quality of this evidence-base using the COnsensus-based Standards for selecting health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tools.

DATA SOURCES

Five electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched from dataset inception to August 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

Study screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed by two independent authors. Inclusion criteria were studies testing one or more psychometric properties of clinical tools for the assessment of overactive bladder symptoms among adults aged 18 years and older for both sexes. The methodological quality and quality of the evidence were evaluated using the COSMIN checklist and GRADE tools, respectively.

RESULTS

The search identified 40 studies totalling 10,634 participants evaluating the psychometric properties of 15 clinical tools. The COSMIN methodological quality was rated good for most measures, and the GRADE quality of evidence ranged from low (13%) to high (33%). The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire and Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score were of good methodological and high-GRADE evidence qualities.

CONCLUSION

Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire and the Neurogenic Bladder Symptoms Score are promising psychometrically sound measures. The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score has been applied to the most culturally diverse populations supported by studies of good methodological and high-GRADE evidence quality.

[DEVELOPMENT OF JAPANESE TRANSLATION OF THE NEUROGENIC BLADDER SYMPTOM SCORE]

(Objectives) To develop Japanese translations of the standard and short forms of the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (Subjects and methods) The questionnaires were forward translated by a Japanese healthcare professional and non-medical professional and backward translated by two native English-speaking translators. Then, the products were harmonized by the participants involved in the translational processes. Finally, 15 persons with spinal cord lesions were interviewed to improve the provisional Japanese translations based on their suggestions. (Results) Throughout the forward and backward translations and their harmonization, no major translational problems were encountered, other than those attributable to differences in syntax between English and Japanese. The persons could complete the provisional Japanese translations of the standard and short forms in median 7.0 and 3.0 minutes, respectively. Although none of them reported difficulty in answering the questions, 6, 3, and 5 persons pointed out that the tenth question (the seventh question in the short form) and the answers to the nineteenth and twenty-second questions, respectively, were not easy to understand. Taking their suggestions into consideration, we finalized the Japanese translations with the help of a developer of the questionnaire as well as the back-translators. (Conclusions) After a multi-step review process, linguistically valid Japanese translations of the standard and short forms of the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score Japanese version 1.0) were completed. We hope that these Japanese translations will facilitate future research on patient-reported outcomes in persons with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.