Effects of echo time on IVIM quantifications of locally advanced breast cancer in clinical diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T

Investigation of diffusion time dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters in the human kidney

PURPOSE

To characterize the diffusion time (Δeff) dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion-related parameters in the human kidney at 3 T.

METHODS

Sixteen healthy volunteers underwent an MRI examination at 3 T including diffusion-weighted imaging at different Δeff ranging from 24.1 to 104.1 ms. The extended mono-exponential ADC and intravoxel incoherent motion models were fitted to the data for each Δeff and the medullary and cortical ADC, (pseudo-)diffusion coefficients (D* and D) and flow-related signal fraction (f) were calculated.

RESULTS

When all the data were used for fitting, a significant trend toward higher ADC with increasing Δeff was observed between 24.1 and 104.1 ms (median and interquartile range: 2.38 [2.19, 2.47] to 2.84 [2.36, 2.90] × 10-3 mm2/s for cortex, and 2.28 [2.18, 2.37] to 2.82 [2.58, 3.11] × 10-3 mm2/s for medulla). In contrast, no significant differences in ADC were found when only the data acquired at b-values higher than 200 s/mm2 were used for fitting. When the intravoxel incoherent motion model was applied, cortical and medullary f increased significantly (cortex: 0.21 [0.15 0.27] to 0.37 [0.32, 0.49] × 10-3 mm2/s; medulla: 0.15 [0.13 0.29] to 0.41 [0.36 0.51] × 10-3 mm2/s). No significant changes in cortical and medullary D and D* were observed as diffusion time increased.

CONCLUSION

Renal perfusion and tubular flow substantially contribute to the observed increase in ADC over a wide range of Δeff between 24 and 104 ms.

Single-shot multi-b-value (SSMb) diffusion-weighted MRI using spin echo and stimulated echoes with variable flip angles

Conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences employing a spin echo or stimulated echo sensitize diffusion with a specific b-value at a fixed diffusion direction and diffusion time (Δ). To compute apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and other diffusion parameters, the sequence needs to be repeated multiple times by varying the b-value and/or gradient direction. In this study, we developed a single-shot multi-b-value (SSMb) diffusion MRI technique, which combines a spin echo and a train of stimulated echoes produced with variable flip angles. The method involves a pair of 90° radio frequency (RF) pulses that straddle a diffusion gradient lobe (GD), to rephase the magnetization in the transverse plane, producing a diffusion-weighted spin echo acquired by the first echo-planar imaging (EPI) readout train. The magnetization stored along the longitudinal axis is successively re-excited by a series of n variable-flip-angle pulses, each followed by a diffusion gradient lobe GD and a subsequent EPI readout train to sample n stimulated-echo signals. As such, (n + 1) diffusion-weighted images, each with a distinct b-value, are acquired in a single shot. The SSMb sequence was demonstrated on a diffusion phantom and healthy human brain to produce diffusion-weighted images, which were quantitative analyzed using a mono-exponential model. In the phantom experiment, SSMb provided similar ADC values to those from a commercial spin-echo EPI (SE-EPI) sequence (r = 0.999). In the human brain experiment, SSMb enabled a fourfold scan time reduction and yielded slightly lower ADC values (0.83 ± 0.26 μm2/ms) than SE-EPI (0.88 ± 0.29 μm2/ms) in all voxels excluding cerebrospinal fluid, likely due to the influence of varying diffusion times. The feasibility of using SSMb to acquire multiple images in a single shot for intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis was also demonstrated. In conclusion, despite a relatively low signal-to-noise ratio, the proposed SSMb technique can substantially increase the data acquisition efficiency in DWI studies.

Quantitative MRI biomarker for classification of clinically significant prostate cancer: Calibration for reproducibility across echo times

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study is to develop a calibration method to account for differences in echo times (TE) and facilitate the use of restriction spectrum imaging restriction score (RSIrs) as a quantitative biomarker for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

METHODS

This study included 197 consecutive patients who underwent MRI and biopsy examination; 97 were diagnosed with csPCa (grade group ≥ 2). RSI data were acquired three times during the same session: twice at minimum TE ~75 ms and once at TE = 90 ms (TEmin1, TEmin2, and TE90, respectively). A linear regression model was determined to match the C-maps of TE90 to the reference C-maps of TEmin1 within the interval ranging from 95th to 99th percentile of signal intensity within the prostate. RSIrs comparisons were made at the 98th percentile within each patient's prostate. We compared RSIrs from calibrated TE90 (RSIrsTE90corr) and uncorrected TE90 (RSIrsTE90) to RSIrs from reference TEmin1 (RSIrsTEmin1) and repeated TEmin2 (RSIrsTEmin2). Calibration performance was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Scaling factors for C1, C2, C3, and C4 were estimated as 1.68, 1.33, 1.02, and 1.13, respectively. In non-csPCa cases, the 98th percentile of RSIrsTEmin2 and RSIrsTEmin1 differed by 0.27 ± 0.86SI (mean ± standard deviation), whereas RSIrsTE90 differed from RSIrsTEmin1 by 1.82 ± 1.20SI. After calibration, this bias was reduced to -0.51 ± 1.21SI, representing a 72% reduction in absolute error. For patients with csPCa, the difference was 0.54 ± 1.98SI between RSIrsTEmin2 and RSIrsTEmin1 and 2.28 ± 2.06SI between RSIrsTE90 and RSIrsTEmin1. After calibration, the mean difference decreased to -1.03SI, a 55% reduction in absolute error. At the Youden index for patient-level classification of csPCa (8.94SI), RSIrsTEmin1 has a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 72%.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed linear calibration method produces similar quantitative biomarker values for acquisitions with different TE, reducing TE-induced error by 72% and 55% for non-csPCa and csPCa, respectively.

Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Parameters in Diffusion MRI of the Calf

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the dependence of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) parameters measured in the human calf on B0. Methods: Diffusion-weighted image data of eight healthy volunteers were acquired using five b-values (0-600 s/mm2) at rest and after muscle activation at 0.55 and 7 T. The musculus gastrocnemius mediale (GM, activated) was assessed. The perfusion fraction f and diffusion coefficient D were determined using segmented fits. The dependence on field strength was assessed using Student's t-test for paired samples and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A biophysical model built on the three non-exchanging compartments of muscle, venous blood, and arterial blood was used to interpret the data using literature relaxation times. Results: The measured perfusion fraction of the GM was significantly lower at 7 T, both for the baseline measurement and after muscle activation. For 0.55 and 7 T, the mean f values were 7.59% and 3.63% at rest, and 14.03% and 6.92% after activation, respectively. The biophysical model estimations for the mean proton-density-weighted perfusion fraction were 3.37% and 6.50% for the non-activated and activated states, respectively. Conclusions: B0 may have a significant effect on the measured IVIM parameters. The blood relaxation times suggest that 7 T IVIM may be arterial-weighted whereas 0.55 T IVIM may exhibit an approximately equal weighting of arterial and venous blood.

Quantitative MRI biomarker for classification of clinically significant prostate cancer: calibration for reproducibility across echo times

Background

Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a quantitative biomarker for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, the quantitative value of the RSIrs is affected by imaging parameters such as echo time (TE).

Purpose

The purpose of the present study is to develop a calibration method to account for differences in echo times and facilitate use of RSIrs as a quantitative biomarker for the detection of csPCa.

Methods

This study included 197 consecutive patients who underwent MRI and biopsy examination; 97 were diagnosed with csPCa (grade group ≥ 2). RSI data were acquired three times during the same session: twice at minimum TE∼75ms and once at TE=90ms (TEmin 1 , TEmin 2 , and TE90, respectively). A proposed calibration method, trained on patients without csPCa, estimated a linear scaling factor (f) for each of the four diffusion compartments (C) of the RSI signal model. A linear regression model was determined to match C-maps of TE90 to the reference C-maps of TEmin 1 within the interval ranging from 95 th to 99 th percentile of signal intensity within the prostate. RSIrs comparisons were made at 98 th percentile within each patient's prostate. We compared RSIrs from calibrated TE90 (RSIrs TE90corr ) and uncorrected TE90 (RSIrs TE90 ) to RSIrs from reference TEmin 1 (RSIrs TEmin1 ) and repeated TEmin 2 (RSIrs TEmin2 ). Calibration performance was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve, positive predicted value, negative predicted value, and F1-score.

Results

Scaling factors for C 1 , C 2 , C 3 , and C 4 were estimated as 1.70, 1.38, 1.03, and 1.19, respectively. In non-csPCa cases, the 98 th percentile of RSIrs TEmin2 and RSIrs TEmin1 differed by 0.27±0.86SI (mean±standard deviation), whereas RSIrs TE90 differed from RSIrs TEmin1 by 1.81±1.20SI. After calibration, this bias was reduced to -0.41±1.20SI, representing a 78% reduction in absolute error. For patients with csPCa, the difference was 0.54±1.98SI between RSIrs TEmin2 and RSIrs TEmin1 and 2.28±2.06SI between RSIrs TE90 and RSIrs TEmin1 . After calibration, the mean difference decreased to -0.86SI, a 38% reduction in absolute error. At the Youden index for patient-level classification of csPCa (8.94SI), RSIrs TEmin1 has a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 72%. Prior to calibration, RSIrs TE90 at the same threshold tended to over-diagnose benign cases (sensitivity 44%, specificity 88%). Post-calibration, RSIrs TE90corr performs more similarly to the reference (sensitivity 71%, specificity 62%).

Conclusion

The proposed linear calibration method produces similar quantitative biomarker values for acquisitions with different TE, reducing TE-induced error by 78% and 38% for non-csPCa and csPCa, respectively.

Conventional, functional and radiomics assessment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background

This paper offers an assessment of diagnostic tools in the evaluation of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods

Several electronic datasets were analysed to search papers on morphological and functional evaluation in ICC patients. Papers published in English language has been scheduled from January 2010 to December 2021.

Results

We found that 88 clinical studies satisfied our research criteria. Several functional parameters and morphological elements allow a truthful ICC diagnosis. The contrast medium evaluation, during the different phases of contrast studies, support the recognition of several distinctive features of ICC. The imaging tool to employed and the type of contrast medium in magnetic resonance imaging, extracellular or hepatobiliary, should change considering patient, departement, and regional features. Also, Radiomics is an emerging area in the evaluation of ICCs.

Post treatment studies are required to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of therapies so as the patient surveillance.

Conclusions

Several morphological and functional data obtained during Imaging studies allow a truthful ICC diagnosis.