SARC-CalF tool has no significant prognostic value in hospitalized patients: A prospective cohort study

SARC-CalF using calf circumference adjusted for BMI predicts 6-mo readmission and mortality in hospitalized patients: a secondary analysis of a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is a prevalent condition associated with worse clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. The SARC-CalF is an accurate instrument for its screening; however, it includes the calf circumference (CC) measure as a criterion, which is influenced by adiposity. An adjustment for CC based on body mass index (BMI) has been proposed, but the literature lacks studies evaluating the SARC-CalF using adjusted CC.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the SARC-CalF with BMI-adjusted CC and compare it between adult and older hospitalized patients.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a cohort with prospective data collection, including individuals aged ≥18 y who were lucid and able to communicate. SARC-CalF was applied using BMI-adjusted CC, obtained by subtracting 3, 7, and 12 cm from CC values when BMI was 25 to 29.99, 30 to 39.99, and ≥40 kg/m2, respectively. Outcomes of interest included prolonged hospital stay, in-hospital death, hospital readmission, and mortality 6 mo after discharge. Logistic and Cox regression analyses, adjusted for Charlson Comorbidity Index and sex, were performed.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 554 patients (mean age 55.2 ± 14.9 y, 52.9% male). Suggestive signs of sarcopenia by SARC-CalF with BMI-adjusted CC were identified in 40.4% of patients (38.6% of adults and 42.7% of older patients, P = 0.380). Suggestive signs of sarcopenia were associated with hospital readmission in adults (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1, 2.9), and 6-mo death in both adult (OR: 4.0; 95% CI: 1.3, 12.1) and older patients (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2, 6.6). It was not independently associated with in-hospital outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

SARC-CalF with BMI-adjusted CC identifies a high frequency of patients with suggestive signs of sarcopenia, regardless of age, and it is independently associated with worse outcomes 6 mo after discharge.

Sarcopenia screening and clinical outcomes in surgical patients: A longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

The SARC-CalF was developed as a screening tool for sarcopenia, but little is still known about its validity in surgical patients. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prognostic value of SARC-CalF in predicting clinical outcomes in patients admitted for any elective surgery in a hospital.

METHODS

Cohort study with prospective data collection of surgical patients ≥18 years of age screened for sarcopenia within 48 h of admission using the SARC-CalF (score ≥11 points classified patients at suggestive signs of sarcopenia). A standard questionnaire for sociodemographic and clinical data was filled and anthropometric data were measured. Clinical outcomes of interest comprised postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay (LPHS), length of hospital stay (LOS), and in-hospital death.

RESULTS

Among the 303 patients admitted for elective surgery across various specialties (58.2 ± 14.6 years; 53.8% men) included, 21.5% presented suggestive signs of sarcopenia (SARC-CalF ≥11). LOS (16.0 [10.0-29.0] vs 13.5 [8.0-22.0] days; P < 0.05) and LPHS (6.0 [3.0-14.5] vs 5.0 [1.0-8.2] days; P < 0.05) were longer in patients with SARC-CalF ≥11 compared with those without this condition. The frequency of severe postoperative complications (23.1% vs 8.8%; P < 0.05) and the incidence of death (12.3% vs 2.9%; P < 0.05) were higher in patients with SARC-CalF ≥11. However, in the multivariate analyses, no association between SARC-CalF ≥11 and clinical outcomes was found.

CONCLUSION

Signs of sarcopenia (SARC-CalF ≥11) were present in >20% of patients who were hospitalized for any elective surgery, but it was not an independent predictor of extended hospital stay, complications, and death.

Exploring the role of body mass index-adjusted calf circumference within the SARC-CalF screening tool among older patients with cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess and compare the frequency of positive scores using unadjusted SARC-CalF with the scores derived from SARC-CalF after adjusting calf circumference (CC) for body mass index (BMI). The secondary aim was to assess the prognostic value of SARC-CalF after BMI adjustment, for length of hospital stay (LOS) and mortality.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, included both outpatients and inpatients of an oncology unit hospital in Brazil.

MEASUREMENTS

BMI and CC were measured. Patients with excess weight had their CC adjusted for BMI by subtracting 3 cm, 7 cm, and 12 cm from the unadjusted CC values for respective BMI categories. SARC-CalF was used to screen for sarcopenia. Scores ≥11 were indicative of sarcopenia, considering both unadjusted and BMI-adjusted CC values. Clinical outcomes included prolonged LOS and both short- and long-term mortality.

RESULTS

Our study included 206 subjects, with a median age of 69 years, and the majority were males (52.1%). The prevalence of low CC increased from 65% to 84% after BMI adjustment. Positive unadjusted SARC-CalF scores (≥11) were observed in 51% of the population and this prevalence increased to 65% using BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF criteria (≥11). Higher scores on BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF but not unadjusted SARC-CalF were independently associated with prolonged LOS [adjusted HR: 1.26 (1.03-1.53)], and 6-month mortality [adjusted HR: 1.42 (1.07-1.87)]. Both unadjusted and BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF were independently associated with 12-month mortality.

CONCLUSION

BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF may be a promising strategy to enhance the detection of older patients with cancer and excess weight at risk of sarcopenia, and it may serve a dual role as a prognostic tool, as it was independently associated with prolonged LOS and mortality.

Prognostic Value of New Sarcopenia Screening Tool in the Elderly-SARC-GLOBAL

Sarcopenia screening tools have a low capacity to predict adverse outcomes that are consequences of sarcopenia in the elderly population. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of a new sarcopenia screening tool SARC-GLOBAL to predict negative clinical outcomes in the elderly. A total of 395 individuals were evaluated in a 42-month period. The screening tools SARC-GLOBAL, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF and the diagnosis of sarcopenia according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Persons (EWGSOP2) were performed at the beginning of the study. Logistic and Poisson regression models were applied to assess the predictive value of the tools for the odds and risks of negative clinical outcomes, respectively. The most common negative clinical outcome in the followed population was falls (12.9%), followed by infections (12.4%), hospitalizations (11.8%), fractures (4.3%), and deaths (2.7%). Both SARC-GLOBAL and SARC-F were similar in predicting the odds of falls and hospitalizations during the follow up period, however SARC-CalF only predicted the odds of hospitalizations at 42 months.

The Predictive Values of Five Sarcopenia Screening Tools on Clinical Outcomes Following Surgery in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The association between strength, assistance with walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs and falls (SARC-F), strength, assistance with walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, falls and calf circumference (SARC-CalF), Ishii score chart, the short version of mini sarcopenia risk assessment (MSRA-5), the full version of mini sarcopenia risk assessment (MSRA-7) and clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer were unclear. We aimed to investigate the predictive values of the above five sarcopenia screening tools on clinical outcomes following surgery in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

The clinical data of consecutive patients who would undergo gastrectomy from May 2020 to October 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were prospectively collected. On the first admission day, patients' characteristics, Nutrition risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002), the above five sarcopenia screening tools and anthropometric measurements were preoperatively collected. Within 24 hours after discharge, operation information, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and clinical outcomes in hospital (postoperative complications, hospitalization expenditures and postoperative hospital stay) were collected. Three months after discharge, clinical outcomes out of hospital (hospital readmissions and mortality) were collected. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the independent predictors for clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 263 patients were finally included in the study, with the average age being 62.44 years. The prevalence of sarcopenia risk ranged from 3.42% to 73.76%. For the above five sarcopenia screening tools, multivariate analyses showed that sarcopenia risk indicated by SARC-CalF was an independent predictor for postoperative complications (OR=3.145 [95%CI: 0.594, 16.665], P=0.037), prolonged postoperative hospital stay (B=2.383 [95%CI: 0.377, 4.388], P=0.020), increased hospitalization expenditures (B=1.305 [95%CI: 0.402, 2.208], P=0.005) and 3-month hospital readmissions (HR=3.626 [95%CI: 1.126, 11.676], P=0.031). Sarcopenia risk indicated by Ishii score chart was an independent predictor for postoperative complications (OR=6.491 [95%CI: 1.514, 27.840], P=0.012) and hospitalization expenditures (B=0.767 [95%CI: 0.065, 1.469], P=0.032). Sarcopenia risk indicated by MSRA-7 was an independent predictor for prolonged postoperative hospital stay (B=1.636 [95%CI: 0.119, 3.153], P=0.035)and increased hospitalization expenditures (B=0.831 [95%CI: 0.146, 1.516], P=0.018).

CONCLUSION

Among the above five sarcopenia screening tools, SARC-CalF seemed to have better predictive values on clinical outcomes. Preoperative gastric cancer patients with sarcopenia risk indicated by SARC-CalF could have a higher risk of postoperative complications, prolonged postoperative hospital stay, increased hospitalization expenditures and 3-month hospital readmissions.

Calf Circumference and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Trend Estimation Approaches

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis and quantify the associations of total mortality with calf circumference (CC) in adults 18 years and older via combining various analyses based on empirical dichotomic CC, continuous CC, and dose-response CC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science published through April 12, 2022. This systematic review includes longitudinal observational studies reporting the relationships of total mortality with CC. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of total mortality with CC per 1 cm for each study and combined the values using standard meta-analysis approaches. Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach (GRADE), and the Instrument for assessing the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) were assessed for meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Our analysis included a total of 37 cohort studies involving 62,736 participants, across which moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2=75.7%, P<0.001), but no publication bias was found. Study quality scores ranged from 6 to 9 (mean 7.7), with only three studies awarded a score of 6 (fair quality). We observed an inverse trend between total death risk and CC per 1 cm increase (RR, 0.95, 95% CI, 0.94-0.96; P<0.001; GRADE quality=high). Only a very slight difference was found among residents of nursing homes (6.9% mortality risk reduction per one cm CC increase), community-dwellers (5.4%), and those living in hospitals (4.8%), respectively (P for meta-regression=0.617). Low credible subgroup difference was found based on the ICEMAN tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Calf circumference is a valid anthropometric measure for mortality risk prediction in a community, nursing home, or hospital.

SARC-F and SARC-CalF Scores as Mortality Risk Factors in Older Men with Cancer: A Longitudinal Study from Peru

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the role of SARC-F and SARC-CalF scores as risk factors for mortality in adults over 60 years of age with cancer of the Centro Médico Naval (CEMENA) in Callao, Peru during 2012-2015.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort carried out from September 2012 to February 2013 in the Geriatrics Department of CEMENA. The outcome variable was mortality at two years of follow-up, while the exposure variable was the risk of sarcopenia assessed using the SARC-F and SARC-CalF scales. We carried out Cox proportional-hazards models to assess the role of SARC-F and SARC-CalF scores as risk factors for mortality. We estimated crude (cHR) and adjusted (aHR) hazard ratios (HR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Likewise, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) of both exposure variables in relation to mortality.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 922 elderly men with cancer; 43.1% (n=397) were between 60 and 70 years old. 21.5% (n=198) and 45.7% (n=421) were at risk of sarcopenia according to SARC-F and SARC-CalF, respectively, while the incidence of mortality was 22.9% (n=211). In the adjusted Cox regression model, we found that the risk of sarcopenia measured by SARC-F (aHR=2.51; 95%CI: 1.40-2.77) and SARC-CalF (aHR=2.04; 95%CI: 1.55-4.02) was associated with a higher risk of death in older men with cancer. In the diagnostic performance analysis, we found that the AUC for mortality prediction was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.68-0.75) for SARC-F and 0.80 (95%CI: 0.78-0.82) for SARC-CalF.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of sarcopenia evaluated by SARC-F and SARC-CalF scores was associated with an increased risk of mortality in older men with cancer. Both scales proved to be useful and accessible instruments for the identification of groups at risk of mortality.