Dual actions of 5-MeO-DIPT at the serotonin transporter and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor in the mouse striatum and prefrontal cortex

Network pharmacology screening, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of antianxiety and antidepressant drug-food analogue

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety disorders are prevalent psychiatric conditions, and currently utilized chemical drugs typically come with significant adverse effects. China boasts a wealth of medicinal and food herbs known for their safe and effective properties.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop novel formulations with improved antidepressant and anxiolytic effects derived from medicinal and food herbs.

STUDY DESIGN

Screening combinations with antidepressant and anxiolytic effects using techniques such as network pharmacology and validating their effects in vitro and in vivo experiments.

METHODS

Utilizing network pharmacology and molecular docking, we identified the top ten medicinal herbs with anxiolytic and antidepressant potential. Herbs with cytoprotective effects and non-toxic characteristics were further screened to formulate the herbal blends. Subsequently, we established a PC12 cell injury model and a chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) model in mice to assess the effects of our formulations.

RESULTS

Ten medicinal herbs were initially screened, and six of them were deemed suitable for formulating the blend, namely Gancao, Dazao, Gouqizi, Sangye, Huangqi, and Jinyinhua (GDGSHJ). The GDGSHJ formulation reduced Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage, decreased apoptosis, and demonstrated a favorable antidepressant and antianxiety effect in the CUMS mouse model. Besides, GDGSHJ led to the upregulation of serum 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) content and brain tissue 5-HT, Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and Dopamine (DA) levels. It also downregulated the expression of SLC6A4 and SLC6A3 genes in the mouse hippocampus while upregulating HTR1A, DRD1, DRD2, and GABRA1 genes.

CONCLUSION

Our formulation exhibited robust antidepressant and antianxiety effects without inducing substantial toxicity. This efficacy appears to be mediated by the expression of relevant genes within the hippocampus of mice. The formulation achieved this effect by balancing 5-HT levels in the serum and DA, GABA, and 5-HT levels within brain tissue.

Friend of the Devil: Negative Social Influences Driving Substance Use Disorders

Substance use disorders in humans have significant social influences, both positive and negative. While prosocial behaviors promote group cooperation and are naturally rewarding, distressing social encounters, such as aggression exhibited by a conspecific, are aversive and can enhance the sensitivity to rewarding substances, promote the acquisition of drug-taking, and reinstate drug-seeking. On the other hand, withdrawal and prolonged abstinence from drugs of abuse can promote social avoidance and suppress social motivation, accentuating drug cravings and facilitating relapse. Understanding how complex social states and experiences modulate drug-seeking behaviors as well as the underlying circuit dynamics, such as those interacting with mesolimbic reward systems, will greatly facilitate progress on understanding triggers of drug use, drug relapse and the chronicity of substance use disorders. Here we discuss some of the common circuit mechanisms underlying social and addictive behaviors that may underlie their antagonistic functions. We also highlight key neurochemicals involved in social influences over addiction that are frequently identified in comorbid psychiatric conditions. Finally, we integrate these data with recent findings on (±)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) that suggest functional segregation and convergence of social and reward circuits that may be relevant to substance use disorder treatment through the competitive nature of these two types of reward. More studies focused on the relationship between social behavior and addictive behavior we hope will spur the development of treatment strategies aimed at breaking vicious addiction cycles.

Dual actions of 5-MeO-DIPT at the serotonin transporter and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor in the mouse striatum and prefrontal cortex

Aims

5‐Methoxy‐N,N‐diisopropyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐DIPT) is a synthetic orally active hallucinogenic tryptamine analogue. The present study examined whether the effects of 5‐MeO‐DIPT involve the serotonin transporter (SERT) and serotonin 5‐hydroxytryptamine‐1A (5‐HT_1A) receptor in the striatum and prefrontal cortex (PFC).

Methods

We investigated the effects of 5‐MeO‐DIPT on extracellular 5‐HT (5‐HT_ex) and dopamine (DA_ex) levels in the striatum and PFC in wildtype and SERT knockout (KO) mice using in vivo microdialysis, and for comparison the effects of the 5‐HT_1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 and the 5‐HT_1A receptor agonist 8‐OH‐DPAT on 5‐HT_ex.

Results

5‐MeO‐DIPT decreased 5‐HT_ex levels in the striatum, but not PFC. In SERT‐KO mice, 5‐MeO‐DIPT did not affect 5‐HT_ex levels in the striatum or PFC. In the presence of WAY100635, 5‐MeO‐DIPT substantially increased 5‐HT_ex levels, suggesting that 5‐MeO‐DIPT acts on SERT and these effects are masked by its 5‐HT_1A actions in the absence of WAY100635. 8‐OH‐DPAT decreased 5‐HT_ex levels in the striatum and PFC in wildtype mice. WAY100635 antagonized the 8‐OH‐DPAT‐induced decrease in 5‐HT_ex levels. In SERT‐KO mice, 8‐OH‐DPAT did not decrease 5‐HT_ex levels in the striatum and PFC. 5‐MeO‐DIPT dose‐dependently increased DA_ex levels in the PFC, but not striatum, in wildtype and SERT‐KO mice. The increase in DA_ex levels that was induced by 5‐MeO‐DIPT was not antagonized by WAY100635.

Conclusion

5‐MeO‐DIPT influences both 5‐HT_ex and DA_ex levels in the striatum and PFC. 5‐MeO‐DIPT dually acts on SERT and 5‐HT_1A receptors so that elevations in 5‐HT_ex levels produced by reuptake inhibition are limited by actions of the drug on 5‐HT_1A receptors.

5‐MeO‐DIPT influences both 5‐HT_ex and DA_ex levels in the striatum and PFC. 5‐MeO‐DIPT dually acts on SERT and 5‐HT1A receptors so that elevations in 5‐HT_ex levels produced by reuptake inhibition are limited by actions of the drug on 5‐HT_1A receptors.