Relationships between Army nursing practice environments and patient outcomes

Healthy work environment: A systematic review informing a nursing professional practice model in the US Military Health System

AIM

The aim of the study was to develop recommendations for creating a healthy work environment based on current literature for nurses working within the US Military Health System (MHS). However, our findings would likely benefit other nursing populations and environments as well.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic literature search for articles published between January 2010 until January 2024 from five databases: PubMed, Joanna Briggs, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus.

METHODS

Articles were screened, selected and extracted using Covidence software. Article findings were synthesized to create recommendations for the development, implementation and measurement of healthy work environments.

RESULTS

Ultimately, a total of 110 articles met the criteria for inclusion in this review. The articles informed 13 recommendations for creating a healthy work environment. The recommendations included ensuring teamwork, mentorship, job satisfaction, supportive leadership, nurse recognition and adequate staffing and resources. Additionally, we identified strategies for implementing and measuring these recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

This thorough systematic review created actionable recommendations for the creation of a healthy work environment. Based on available evidence, implementation of these recommendations could improve nursing work environments.

IMPACT

This study identifies methods for implementing and measuring aspects of a healthy work environment. Nurse leaders or others can implement the recommendations provided here to develop healthy work environments in their hospitals, clinics or other facilities where nurses practice.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

American Psychiatric Nurses Association Position: Staffing Inpatient Psychiatric Units

OBJECTIVE

An American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA) task force reviewed current staffing research to revise and update the 2011 APNA "Staffing inpatient psychiatric units" position paper and provide recommendations to the APNA Board of Directors on how psychiatric mental health (PMH) nurses might champion the staffing needs of inpatient psychiatric units.

METHODS

Current research on staffing and nursing practice in inpatient psychiatric units was reviewed as well as variables believed to influence staffing and nursing practice, such as consumer needs and workplace culture. Since current nurse staffing principles emphasize nursing value and how that value is connected to outcomes, the literature search included a focus on staffing and related patient outcomes.

RESULTS

PMH nurses are critical to the safety and quality of care in inpatient psychiatric units. However, there are little existing data on the relationship between staffing levels and even common adverse events such as staff injury and restraint of patients. Furthermore, there is scant research conducted on inpatient psychiatric units that informs optimal staffing models or establishes links between staffing and patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with current evidence, the universal use of a single method or model of determining staffing needs (e.g., nursing hours per, case mix index, or mandatory ratios) is not recommended. PMH nurses should champion systematic evaluation of staffing on their inpatient units against select patient, nurse, and system outcomes. A data repository of PMH nurse-sensitive outcomes is necessary to benchmark unit performance and staffing.

Nurse Attrition: Content Analysis of Free-Text Responses From Two Military Nursing Practice Environment Surveys

INTRODUCTION

Staff nurse attrition negatively impacts readiness of the warfighter and the health and wellbeing of all beneficiaries of the Military Health System (MHS). To promote the retention of a robust nursing workforce, a complete understanding of nurses' perceptions regarding their intent to leave is necessary. The purpose of this study was to explore the free-text responses of 1,438 nurses working among military medical treatment facilities for factors influencing their intent to leave, as an indicator of potential turnover, or attrition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study employed thematic analysis to investigate the qualitative responses from the 2016 and 2018 Military Nursing Practice Environment Surveys. The study was determined to be exempt from Institutional Review Board review through the Womack Army Medical Center's Human Research Protection Program.

RESULTS

Findings indicate that leadership and management (n = 647), staffing (n = 353), career opportunities (n = 345), staff outcomes (n = 247), culture (n = 153), quality of care (n = 99), patient care barriers (n = 86), non-patient care activities (n = 79), lack of formal professional development (n = 75), and area or care environment (n = 67) were among the top factors influencing staff nurse intent to leave, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the evaluation of retention strategies using implementation science for nurses and nurse resource personnel (e.g., nursing assistants, technicians, medics, and corpsman) to ensure a robust nursing work force throughout the MHS. Staff nurses and resource personnel working among military treatment facilities and embedded in units supporting combat and humanitarian missions ensure access to care and health promotion of the warfighter and all MHS beneficiaries.

Quality and Safety in Nursing: Recommendations From a Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

As a consistent 24-hour presence in hospitals, nurses play a pivotal role in ensuring the quality and safety (Q&S) of patient care. However, a comprehensive review of evidence-based recommendations to guide nursing interventions that enhance the Q&S of patient care is lacking. Therefore, the purpose of our systematic review was to create evidence-based recommendations for the Q&S component of a nursing professional practice model for military hospitals. To accomplish this, a triservice military nursing team used Covidence software to conduct a systematic review of the literature across five databases. Two hundred forty-nine articles met inclusion criteria. From these articles, we created 94 recommendations for practice and identified eight focus areas from the literature: (1) communication; (2) adverse events; (3) leadership; (4) patient experience; (5) quality improvement; (6) safety culture/committees; (7) staffing/workload/work environment; and (8) technology/electronic health record. These findings provide suggestions for implementing Q&S practices that could be adapted to many healthcare delivery systems.

Workforce Engagement for Compassionate Advocacy, Resilience, and Empowerment (WE CARE): An Evidence-Based Wellness Program

Poor well-being and burnout among the nursing workforce were heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to deliver, spread, and sustain an evidence-based wellness program, Workforce Engagement for Compassionate Advocacy, Resilience, and Empowerment (WE CARE), for nurse leaders, staff registered nurses (RNs), and patient care technicians (PCTs) to ameliorate or prevent burnout, promote resilience, and improve the work environment. The program included Community Resiliency Model (CRM) training provided by a certified 6-member wellness team. A baseline and 6-month follow-up survey included measures of well-being, moral distress, burnout, resilience, perceived organizational support (POS), job satisfaction, intent to leave (ITL), and work environment. A total of 4900 inpatient RNs, PCTs, and leaders of a 1207-bed academic medical center in the southeastern United States were analyzed. From baseline (n = 1533) to 6-month follow-up (n = 1457), well-being, moral distress, burnout, job satisfaction, and work environment improved; however, resilience, POS, and ITL did not. Although we have seen some improvements in well-being and mental health indicators, it is still early in the intervention period to have reached a critical mass with the training and other interventions. The mental health and work environment issues among nurses are so complex, no one-size-fits-all intervention can resolve.

Differences in Nurses' Satisfaction and Demand for Spatial Design Among Different Departments of Nursing Units: A Case Study in China

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to extend original research and identify operational and space-related requirements for specialization from the perspectives of nursing behavior and process.

BACKGROUND

Studies related to the specialty of different nursing units have been widely conducted in nursing science, while few studies have explored the specialized requirements for the physical environments of nursing units in different departments.

METHOD

Questionnaire survey data were collected from 125 nurses in 11 clinical departments, and nurse shadowing (approximately 68 hr) was conducted in four clinical departments.

RESULTS

The questionnaire survey showed that satisfaction with care activity, visibility, and physical environment within the existing nursing unit environment was rated differently among different departments of nursing units. However, nurses in different groups of age, education, work experience, and position indicated no statistically significant difference. Behavioral observations demonstrated that the spatial and temporal distributions of activities, spatial linkages, and communication patterns varied in distinct departments.

CONCLUSION

This research found that nurses in different departments had different evaluations of satisfaction and environmental characteristics. It also explains the differences in nursing work behaviors and processes found in various departments and sheds light on specialized requirements from the behavior perspective. The findings could help optimize the design of efficient and satisfactory nursing units in different departments.

Modernizing Measure of the Nurse Work Environment

BACKGROUND

Research has established a relationship between favorable nurse work environments and better nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes. However, the instrument most frequently used to measure the nurse work environment, the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI), has not had its items significantly re-evaluated since the 1980s.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the psychometric properties of an updated PES-NWI and create an instrument suitable for further testing and refinement to measure the present-day nurse work environment. Specifically, we sought to establish construct, structural, discriminative, and concurrent validity. For reliability, we desired to establish interrater reliability and internal consistency reliability.

METHODS

We administered a modified PES-NWI to a national sample of direct-care hospital nurses (n = 818) in the United States. We then assessed the psychometric properties of the instrument.

RESULTS

While the modified PES-NWI displayed adequate validity and reliability properties, further testing and refinement of the instrument is necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

With this updated measure of the nurse work environment, researchers and hospital leaders can identify modifiable opportunities for improvement in contemporary hospital nurse work environments which may enhance nurse and patient outcomes.

Measuring the Work Environment: The Voice of the Staff Nurse

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to obtain direct care hospital nurse input on the relevance of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) and to determine whether additional items are needed to measure the contemporary nursing work environment (NWE).

BACKGROUND

Instruments accurately measuring the NWE are essential due to the NWE's association with nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes. However, the most frequently used instrument for measuring the NWE has not been scrutinized by today's practicing direct care nurses to ensure its current relevancy.

METHODS

Researchers administered a survey with a modified PES-NWI and open-ended questions to a national sample of direct care hospital nurses.

RESULTS

Three items from the PES-NWI may be suitable for removal, and additional items may be added to accurately measure the current NWE.

CONCLUSION

Most PES-NWI items remain relevant for modern nursing practice. However, some revisions could enable greater precision in measuring the current NWE.

Findings from the development of a nursing joint professional practice model for the U.S. military

BACKGROUND

By 2022 the Defense Health Agency became responsible for administration of all military treatment facilities (MTFs), which were previously managed by their respective military services. However, three different service-specific nursing professional practice models currently govern nursing practice in MTFs.

PURPOSE

To describe the literature search, review, and synthesis of evidence which informed the JPPM and provide some of the most actionable findings.

METHODS

A team of tri-service nurses developed the JPPM by conducting six rigorous systematic reviews to synthesize evidence pertaining to relevant model components.

DISCUSSION

A total of 51,360 titles and abstracts were initially screened. Data were extracted from 540 included articles. The team then developed standards for five JPPM components: evidence-based practice, safety and quality, leadership development, healthy work environment, and operational readiness.

CONCLUSION

The JPPM is a meaningful framework that will help create a mutual professional identity and shared vision to promote a unified nursing force in U.S. military settings.

The Primary Nursing Care Model and Inpatients' Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Quantitative Studies

BACKGROUND

The delivery of quality, safe, and patient-centered care is foundational for professional practice. The primary nursing model allows nurses to have excellent knowledge about patients and families and to plan and coordinate care from admission to discharge, with better management of health situations. Nurses play a crucial role in improving patients' outcomes, namely those sensitive to nursing care. The knowledge of the relationship between the primary nursing model and the nursing-sensitive outcomes provides new scientific evidence that strengthens the relevance of this nursing care organization model in the inpatients' health outcomes. This systematic review describes the relationship between nurse-sensitive inpatients' outcomes and the primary nursing care model.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted with a narrative synthesis, and the following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Nursing & Allied Health Collection, SciELO Collections, and Cochrane.

RESULTS

A total of 22 full texts were assessed, of which five were included in the study according to the selection criteria. The analysis results indicated that the primary nursing care model was related to nursing-sensitive patient safety outcomes. Patients' experience was also considered a nursing-sensitive outcome, namely in the satisfaction with nursing care.

CONCLUSION

The negative outcomes are clearly related to the primary nursing care model. There is scarce research that relates primary nursing to positive outcomes, such as patients' functional status and self-care abilities, and more studies are needed.

Comparing the Nurse Work Environment, Job Satisfaction, and Intent to Leave Among Military, Magnet®, Magnet-Aspiring, and Non-Magnet Civilian Hospitals

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the nurse work environment, job satisfaction, and intent to leave (ITL) among military, Magnet®, Magnet-aspiring, and non-Magnet civilian hospitals.

BACKGROUND

The professional nurse work environment is an important, modifiable, organizational trait associated with positive nurse and patient outcomes; creating and maintaining a favorable work environment should be imperative for nursing leaders.

METHODS

Secondary data from the Army Nurse Corps and the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators included the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) and single-item measures of job satisfaction and ITL.

RESULTS

Magnet and military hospitals had identical PES-NWI composite scores; however, statistically significant differences existed among the subscales. Military nurses were the most satisfied among all groups, although this difference was not statistically significant, yet their ITL was highest.

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable work environments may exist in other organizational forms besides Magnet; however, the specific components must be considered.

Development and Testing of the Quality Improvement Self-efficacy Inventory

Quality improvement is paramount for patient safety. Leading change for quality improvement requires nurses with knowledge and skills beyond the clinical management of patients. In this study, staff nurses working in hospitals throughout Alabama were asked via an online survey to rate their quality improvement knowledge and skills using the new 10-item Quality Improvement Self-Efficacy Inventory (QISEI) and their perceptions of the nursing work environment using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. Nurses (N = 886) rated the basic quality improvement items higher than the more advanced items. Several nurse characteristics and the nursing work environment were associated with nurses' ratings of their quality improvement knowledge and skills. Educators and administrators in health care organizations can use QISEI to gauge their nurses' knowledge and skills and then develop continuous professional development opportunities aimed at improving quality and safety competencies.

Comparing rates and causes of, and views on reporting of medication errors among nurses working in different-sized hospitals

BACKGROUND

Medication errors are detrimental to patient safety and the quality of hospital services.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to compare registered nurses working in the small-, medium-, and large-sized Jordanian hospitals' responses in terms of reported rate and cause of medication errors and their views on medication error reporting.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional comparative design, with a total sample of 229 nurses working in different-sized hospitals.

RESULTS

The rates of reported medication errors were significantly different across hospitals representing 53.5% in small-sized, 41.8% in medium-sized, and 32.8% in large-sized hospitals. No significant differences between hospitals regarding the nurses' reported causes of medication errors. Nurses' views were significantly different in all aspects of their reporting except in their failure to report (drug) error.

CONCLUSIONS

The hospital's size may associate with nurses' reporting rate and nurses' views on reporting such errors. There is an urgent need for more diligent systematic efforts to prevent, detect, and report medication errors. Collaboration with other health team members, including information technology members, will enhance the outcomes associated with medication administration. The findings of this study warranted further investigations.

The relationship between the nursing practice environment and five nursing-sensitive patient outcomes in acute care hospitals: A systematic review

Aim

To synthesize the available evidence on the relationship between the nursing practice environment in acute care hospitals and five selected nursing‐sensitive patient outcomes (mortality, medication error, pressure injury, hospital‐acquired infection and patient fall).

Design

A quantitative systematic review of literature was conducted using the PRISMA reporting guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42020143104).

Methods

A systematic review was undertaken up to October 2020 using: CINAHL, MEDLINE and Scopus. The review included studies exploring the relationship between the nursing practice environment in adult acute care settings and one of five selected patient outcomes using administrative data sources. Studies were published in English since 2000.

Results

Ten studies were included. Seven studies reported that a favourable nursing practice environment reduced the likelihood of mortality in acute care hospitals, but estimates of the effect size varied. Evidence on the association between the nursing practice environment and medication administration error, pressure injury and hospital‐acquired infection was mixed.