A Secondary Data Analysis Examining Young Adults' Performance in an Internet Weight Loss Program with Financial Incentives

The Effectiveness of Strategies to Improve User Engagement With Digital Health Interventions Targeting Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Overweight and Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Digital health interventions (DHIs) are effective in improving poor nutrition, physical inactivity, overweight and obesity. There is evidence suggesting that the impact of DHIs may be enhanced by improving user engagement. However, little is known about the overall effectiveness of strategies on engagement with DHIs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the overall effectiveness of strategies to improve engagement with DHIs targeting nutrition, physical activity, and overweight or obesity and explore associations between strategies and engagement outcomes. The secondary aim was to explore the impact of these strategies on health risk outcomes.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Academic Source Complete databases were searched up to July 24, 2023. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that evaluated strategies to improve engagement with DHIs and reported on outcomes related to DHI engagement (use or user experience). Strategies were classified according to behavior change techniques (BCTs) and design features (eg, supplementary emails). Multiple-variable meta-analyses of the primary outcomes (usage and user experience) were undertaken to assess the overall effectiveness of strategies. Meta-regressions were conducted to assess associations between strategies and use and user experience outcomes. Synthesis of secondary outcomes followed the "Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis" guidelines. The methodological quality and evidence was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 54 studies (across 62 publications) were included. Pooled analysis found very low-certainty evidence of a small-to-moderate positive effect of the use of strategies to improve DHI use (standardized mean difference=0.33, 95% CI 0.20-0.46; P<.001) and very low-certainty evidence of a small-to-moderate positive effect on user experience (standardized mean difference=0.29, 95% CI 0.07-0.52; P=.01). A significant positive association was found between the BCTs social support (effect size [ES]=0.40, 95% CI 0.14-0.66; P<.001) and shaping knowledge (ES=0.39, 95% CI 0.03-0.74; P=.03) and DHI use. A significant positive association was found among the BCTs social support (ES=0.70, 95% CI 0.18-1.22; P=.01), repetition and substitution (ES=0.29, 95% CI 0.05-0.53; P=.03), and natural consequences (ES=0.29, 95% CI 0.05-0.53; P=.02); the design features email (ES=0.29, 95% CI 0.05-0.53; P=.02) and SMS text messages (ES=0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.57; P=.01); and DHI user experience. For secondary outcomes, 47% (7/15) of nutrition-related, 73% (24/33) of physical activity-related, and 41% (14/34) of overweight- and obesity-related outcomes reported an improvement in health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although findings suggest that the use of strategies may improve engagement with DHIs targeting such health outcomes, the true effect is unknown because of the low quality of evidence. Future research exploring whether specific forms of social support, repetition and substitution, natural consequences, emails, and SMS text messages have a greater impact on DHI engagement is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018077333; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=77333.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Healthy diet, weight control and physical activity to reduce obesity can be motivated by financial incentives (FI). Behavioral-economic approaches may improve the incentivization effectiveness. This study compares and ranks the effectiveness of standard and behavioral incentivization for healthy diet, weight control, and physical activity promotion.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether behavioral-economic insights improve incentivization effectiveness.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline and Scopus was performed from database inception to December 2020. Study characteristics, program designs, and risk ratio (RR) were extracted. A two-stage network meta-analysis pooled and ranked intervention effects.

RESULTS

There were 35 eligible RCTs. For diet-weight control, standard FI, deposit contract (deposit), lottery-based incentive (lottery), and standard-FI + lottery increased goal achievement compared to no-FI but only deposit was statistically significant with pooled RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 1.21 (0.94, 1.56), 1.79 (1.04, 3.05), 1.45 (0.99, 2.13), and 1.73 (0.83, 3.63). For physical activity, standard-FI, deposit, and lottery significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.38 (1.13, 1.68), 1.63 (1.24, 2.14) and 1.43 (1.14, 1.80), respectively. In a follow-up period for physical activity, only deposit significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.39 (1.11, 1.73).

CONCLUSION

Deposit, followed by lottery, were best for motivating healthy diet, weight control and physical activity at program end. Post-intervention, deposit then standard-FI were best for motivating physical activity. Behavioral insights can improve incentivization effectiveness, although lottery-based approaches may offer only short-term benefit regarding physical activity. However, the imprecise intervention effects were major concerns.

The experiences of adolescents and young adults with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is one of the most common and severe chronic neurological disorders and is associated with psychosocial problems. Several qualitative studies have investigated the experiences of adolescents and young adults with epilepsy. However, the findings were conflicting to some extent. This study examined and synthesized qualitative research data to understand the experiences of adolescents and young adults living with epilepsy, improving the development of targeted interventions and enhancing these experiences.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize qualitative evidence about the experiences of adolescents and young adults suffering from epilepsy.

METHODS

This systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis used the Joanna Briggs methodology for qualitative systematic reviews [1]. PubMed, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for studies indexed until March 2022. Qualitative data were extracted, analyzed, and aggregated using meta-synthesis.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the review. Three distinct themes were identified: "impact of epilepsy," "emotions associated with epilepsy," and "self-management of epilepsy." The results show that adolescents and young adults with epilepsy develop different strategies to manage epilepsy and associated problems.

CONCLUSION

The results improved our understanding of the experiences of adolescents and young adults suffering from epilepsy. Several approaches are encouraged to improve these experiences and the quality of life, including granting more autonomy to affected children, providing individualized care and advice, improving public awareness of epilepsy to avoid stigma, and strengthening legal frameworks to safeguard the rights of affected people.

Recruitment and retention of emerging adults in lifestyle interventions: Findings from the REACH trial

OBJECTIVE

Emerging adulthood (EA) is a critical time to promote cardiometabolic health, but EAs are underrepresented in lifestyle intervention trials. Knowledge gaps exist regarding how best to recruit and retain sociodemographically diverse EAs. Our goal was to begin to address these gaps using data from the Richmond Emerging Adults Choosing Health (REACH) Trial.

METHODS

REACH was a comparative efficacy trial for EAs, age 18-25, with a body mass index of 25-45 kg/m2. Enrollment goals were: N = 381, ≥40% underrepresented race/ethnicity, ≥30% men, ≥85% retention at 6 months. We translated formative work into a recruitment and retention plan, examined yield for recruitment and retention overall, and by gender and race/ethnicity, as well as cost data. Descriptive statistics and chi square tests were used.

RESULTS

Enrollment benchmarks were met overall (N = 382) and for participants from underrepresented race/ethnic backgrounds (58.0%), but not men (17.3%). The most common recruitment sources were email (26.9%), radio (22.2%), and online radio (15.4%); this pattern largely held true across gender and race/ethnic groups, though word of mouth and participant referral together accounted for nearly a quarter of enrolled men. Costs averaged $155 per randomized participant. Retention was 89% at 3-months, 84% at 6-months (primary endpoint) and 80% at 12-months (follow-up), with no significant differences by gender or race/ethnicity (all p's > 0.05). Retention did not differ by recruitment method (p = .69).

CONCLUSIONS

Grounding our approach in formative data and embracing participants as partners in research contributed to the recruitment and retention of sociodemographically diverse EAs. Additional efforts are needed to enroll EA men.

Effect of a Lifestyle Intervention on Cardiometabolic Health Among Emerging Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

The prevalence of obesity has increased substantially among emerging adults, yet no previous large-scale behavioral weight loss trials have been conducted among this age group.

OBJECTIVE

To test the effect of 2 theory-based motivational enhancements on weight loss within a primarily digital lifestyle intervention designed for emerging adults.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this randomized clinical trial conducted at an academic medical research center, 382 participants aged 18 to 25 years with a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 25 to 45 were enrolled between February 2, 2016, and February 6, 2019. Data collection was completed February 8, 2020. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: developmentally adapted behavioral weight loss (aBWL), aBWL plus behavioral economics (aBWL + BE), or aBWL plus self-determination theory (aBWL + SDT). All groups received a 6-month intervention with 1 group session, 1 individual session, and a digital platform (digital tools for self-monitoring, weekly lessons, tailored feedback, text messages, and optional social media). The aBWL + BE group received modest financial incentives for self-monitoring and weight loss; the aBWL + SDT group received optional experiential classes. Coaching and message framing varied by group.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was mean (SE) weight change (in kilograms) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included proportion of participants achieving weight loss of 5% or more, percentage weight change, waist circumference, body composition, and blood pressure.

RESULTS

Among the 382 participants (mean [SD] age, 21.9 [2.2] years), 316 (82.7%) were female, mean (SD) BMI was 33.5 (4.9), 222 (58.1%) were of underrepresented race and/or ethnicity, and 320 (83.8%) were retained at the primary end point. There was a significant time effect for mean (SE) weight loss (-3.22 [0.55] kg in the aBWL group; -3.47 [0.55] kg in the aBWL + BE group; and -3.40 [0.53] kg in the aBWL + SDT group; all P < .001), but no between-group differences were observed (aBWL vs aBWL + BE: difference, -0.25 kg [95% CI, -1.79 to 1.29 kg]; P = .75; aBWL vs aBWL + SDT: difference, -0.18 kg [95% CI, -1.67 to 1.31 kg]; P = .81; and aBWL + SDT vs aBWL + BE: difference, 0.07 kg [95% CI, -1.45 to 1.59 kg]; P = .93). The proportion of participants achieving a weight loss of 5% or more was 40.0% in the aBWL group (50 of 125), 39.8% in the aBWL + BE group (51 of 128), and 44.2% in the aBWL + SDT group (57 of 129), which was not statistically different across groups (aBWL vs aBWL + BE, P = .89; aBWL vs aBWL + SDT, P = .45; aBWL + SDT vs aBWL + BE, P = .54). Parallel findings were observed for all secondary outcomes-clinically and statistically significant improvements with no differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, all interventions produced clinically significant benefit, but neither of the motivational enhancements promoted greater reductions in adiposity compared with the developmentally adapted standard group. Continued efforts are needed to optimize lifestyle interventions for this high-risk population and determine which intervention works best for specific individuals based on sociodemographic and/or psychosocial characteristics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02736981.

Effect of tailoring on weight loss among young adults receiving digital interventions: an 18 month randomized controlled trial

Weight loss outcomes among young adults in technology-based programs have been equivocal. The purpose of this study was to deliver digital weight loss treatments to young adults and examine the 6, 12, and 18 month effects on weight loss. Young adults with overweight/obesity (N = 459; 23.3 ± 4.4 years) were recruited from two university sites and randomly assigned to receive through Facebook and text messaging either personalized (TAILORED; n = 150) or generic (TARGETED; n = 152) weight loss information, messages, and feedback or general healthy body content (e.g., body image, sleep; CONTROL; n = 157). The study was powered to detect a 2.1-kg difference at all time points with the primary outcome being 18 months. There was no overall effect of treatment group on 6, 12, or 18 month weight loss (ps = NS). However, at 6 months, those in TAILORED who were highly engaged (completing >66%) lost more weight compared to CONTROL (-2.32 kg [95% confidence intervals: -3.90, -0.74]; p = .004), with the trend continuing at 12 months. A significant baseline body mass index (BMI) by treatment group interaction (p = .004) was observed at 6 months. Among participants in the lowest baseline BMI category (25-27.5 kg/m2), those in TAILORED lost 2.27 kg (-3.86, -0.68) more, and those in TARGETED lost 1.72 kg (-3.16, -0.29) more than CONTROL after adjusting for covariates. Among participants with a BMI between 27.5 and 30 kg/m2, those in TAILORED lost 2.20 kg (-3.90, -0.51) more than participants in TARGETED. Results did not persist over time with no treatment interaction at 12 or 18 months. Initial body weight should be considered when recommending weight loss treatments for young adults. More intensive interventions or stepped care approaches may be needed for young adults with obesity.

Behavioral weight loss in emerging adults: Design and rationale for the Richmond Emerging Adults Choosing Health (REACH) randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In the U.S., over 40% of 18-25 year olds meet criteria for overweight or obesity. Yet, no large-scale trials have targeted this age group for behavioral weight loss (BWL). Formative data revealed that existing BWL programs do not meet their unique needs and identified motivation as a fundamental barrier for weight management. The goal of the Richmond Emerging Adults Choosing Health (REACH) trial was to test the efficacy of two mHealth lifestyle interventions specifically focused on enhancing motivation, relative to adapted standard.

METHODS

Participants (N = 381, 18-25 years, body mass index 25-45 kg/m²) will be randomized to 1) adapted BWL (aBWL), 2) aBWL + self-determination theory (aBWL+SDT), or 3) aBWL + behavioral economics (aBWL+BE). All arms will receive a 6-month intervention, delivered via one group session and one individual session, followed by an mHealth platform. Assessments will occur at baseline, 3-months, 6-months (post-treatment) and 12-months (following a no-contact period). The primary aim is to compare weight loss outcomes at 6 months. Secondary aims include changes at 6-months in physical and behavioral cardiometabolic risk factors, as well as psychosocial measures. We will also explore weight loss maintenance, change in hypothesized mediators, and moderators of treatment response.

DISCUSSION

REACH is the first large-scale BWL trial designed specifically for emerging adults. Further, it will be the first trial to compare a lifestyle intervention grounded in self-determination theory to one rooted in behavioral economics. If clinically significant reductions in adiposity are achieved, findings could inform a scalable treatment model to meet the needs of this vulnerable population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02736981.

Efficiency of a 15-Week Weight-Loss Program, Including a Low-Calorie Formula Diet, on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Overweight or Obesity

INTRODUCTION

Patients who are overweight or obese have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Weight loss can have a positive effect on glycemic control.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate glycemic control in patients with T2DM and overweight or obesity during a structured weight-loss program.

METHODS

This was a prospective, interventional study. We recruited 36 patients (14 men and 22 women) with a median age of 58.5 years and median body mass index (BMI) of 34.1, to a 15-week structured weight-loss program with a low-calorie (800 kcal) formula diet for 6 weeks. The primary end point, HbA1c level, and secondary end points, anthropometric data, medication, and safety, were assessed weekly. Laboratory values and quality of life were assessed at baseline and after 15 weeks.

RESULTS

HbA1c decreased from 7.3% at baseline to 6.5% at 15 weeks (p < 0.001), median body weight by 11.9 kg (p < 0.001), median BMI by 4.3 (p < 0.001) and median waist circumference by 11.0 cm (p < 0.001). Two participants discontinued insulin therapy, 4 could reduce their dosage of oral antidiabetic agents, and 6 completely discontinued their antidiabetic medication. Insulin dose decreased from 0.63 (0.38-0.89) to 0.39 (0.15-0.70) units/kg body weight (p < 0.001). No patient experienced hypoglycemic episodes or hospital emergency visits. Triglycerides and total cholesterol decreased as well as surrogate markers of liver function. However, the levels of high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C and LDL-C) as well as uric acid remain unchanged. Regarding quality of life, the median physical health score increased from 44.5 (39.7-51.4) at baseline to 48.0 (43.1-55.3; p = 0.007), and the median mental health score decreased from 42.1 (36.1-46.7) to 37.4 (30.3-43.7; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

A structured weight-loss program is effective in the short term in reducing HbA1c, weight, and antidiabetic medication in patients with T2DM who are overweight or obese. Levels of HDL-C and LDL-C were not affected by short-term weight loss. The decline in mental health and the long-term effects of improved glycemic control require further trials.