1
|
Conroy MR, Dennehy C, Forde PM. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2023; 183:107314. [PMID: 37541935 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
Only a minority of lung cancers are resectable at diagnosis, and many of these will eventually relapse. Adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting has a modest survival advantage, and there is significant need for new approaches to improve cure rates. Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has transformed the prognosis for advanced lung cancer, and is increasingly being used in the neoadjuvant setting alone, or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. While this has demonstrated convincing improvements in event-free survival and pathologic response, questions remain over optimal duration of therapy, predictive and prognostic biomarkers, response assessment and combination with other modalities. In addition, these results must be considered in the context of recent positive studies of adjuvant immunotherapy. Here, we summarise preclinical context and clinical trials in this space, discuss areas of controversy and pitfalls, and consider future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Conroy
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Colum Dennehy
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Patrick M Forde
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kris MG, Mitsudomi T, Peters S. Adjuvant therapies in stages I-III epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung cancer: current and future perspectives. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2023; 12:824-836. [PMID: 37197636 PMCID: PMC10183392 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-22-723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection followed by adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the recommended treatment for patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Even with the best management, recurrence is common and increases with disease stage (stage I: 26-45%; stage II: 42-62%; stage III: 70-77%). For patients with metastatic lung cancer and tumours that harbour epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved survival. Their effectiveness in advanced stages of NSCLC raises the possibility that these agents may improve outcomes for patients with resectable EGFR-mutated lung cancer. In the ADAURA study, adjuvant osimertinib provided a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and reduced central nervous system (CNS) disease recurrence in patients with resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with or without prior adjuvant chemotherapy. To reap the maximum benefits of EGFR-TKIs for patients with lung cancer, the early and rapid identification of EGFR mutations [and other oncogenic drivers, such as programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), with matched targeted therapies] in diagnostic pathologic specimens has become essential. To ensure patients receive the most appropriate treatment, routine, comprehensive histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analyses (with multiplex next generation sequencing) should be undertaken at the time of diagnosis. The potential for personalised treatments to cure more patients with early-stage lung cancer can only be realised if all therapies are considered when the care plan is formulated, by the multi-specialty experts managing patients. In this review, we discuss the progress and prospects for adjuvant treatments as part of a comprehensive plan of care for patients with resected stages I-III EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and explore how the field could go beyond DFS and overall survival to make cure a more frequent outcome of treatment in patients with resected EGFR-mutated lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G. Kris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Solange Peters
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bain NT, Wang Y, Arulananda S. Minimal residual disease in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1002714. [PMID: 36212398 PMCID: PMC9533094 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1002714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeted therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is an effective treatment for EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however most patients invariably relapse after a period of minimal residual disease (MRD). This mini-review explores the mechanistic pathways leading to tumour dormancy, cellular senescence and epigenetic changes involving YAP/TEAD activation. We describe the various approaches of utilising TKIs in combination with agents to intensify initial depth of response, enhance apoptosis and target senescence-like dormancy. This mini-review will also highlight the potential novel therapies under development targeting MRD to improve outcomes for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan T. Bain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Surein Arulananda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- *Correspondence: Surein Arulananda,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lemmon CA, Zabor EC, Pennell NA. Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Osimertinib for Patients with Resected EGFR-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Oncologist 2022; 27:407-413. [PMID: 35285487 PMCID: PMC9074960 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib was recently approved for resected EGFR-mutant stages IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer due to improved disease-free survival (DFS) in this population compared with placebo. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of this strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We constructed a Markov model using post-resection health state transitions with digitized DFS data from the ADAURA trial to compare cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib versus placebo over a 10-year time horizon. An overall survival (OS) benefit of 5% was assumed. Costs and utility values were derived from Medicare reimbursement data and literature. A CE threshold of 3 times the gross domestic product per capita was used. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for adjuvant osimertinib was $317 119 per QALY-gained versus placebo. Initial costs of osimertinib are higher in years 1-3. Costs due to progressive disease (PD) are higher in the placebo group through the first 6.5 years. Average pre-PD, post-PD, and total costs were $2388, $379 047, and $502 937, respectively, in the placebo group, and $505 775, $255 638, and $800 697, respectively, in the osimertinib group. Sensitivity analysis of OS gains reaches CE with an hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70-0.75 benefit of osimertinib over placebo. A 50% discount to osimertinib drug cost yielded an ICER of $115 419. CONCLUSIONS Three-years of adjuvant osimertinib is CE if one is willing to pay $317 119 more per QALY-gained. Considerable OS benefit over placebo or other economic interventions will be needed to reach CE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher A Lemmon
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Emily C Zabor
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nathan A Pennell
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cansouline X, Lipan B, Sizaret D, Tallet A, Vandier C, Carmier D, Legras A. EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer at Surgical Stages: What Is the Place for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092257. [PMID: 35565386 PMCID: PMC9099844 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are drugs targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor. In lung cancer, they are used to treat advanced EGFR-mutant diseases, and more recently, one has been approved for adjuvant therapy. Even though publications on the topic are numerous, conclusions are difficult to interpret and are sometimes contradictory. We therefore reviewed the literature in order to present an overview of up-to-date data regarding the adjuvant and neoadjuvant use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with particular attention given to their benefits, proven or expected, as well as what challenges could be faced when entering them as protocols in standard care. Abstract The ADAURA trial has been significant for the perception of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as a tool for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It produced such great insight that the main TKI, Osimertinib, was rapidly integrated into international guidelines for adjuvant use. However, EGFR-mutant NSCLC is a complex entity and has various targeting drugs, and the benefits for patients might not be as clear as they seem. We reviewed trials and meta-analyses considering TKI adjuvant and neoadjuvant use. We also explored the influence of mutation variability and financial evaluations. We found that TKIs often show disease-free survival (DFS) benefits, yet studies have struggled to improve the overall survival (OS); however, the results from the literature might be confusing because of variability in the stages and mutations. The safety profiles and adverse events are acceptable, but costs remain high and accessibility might not be optimal. TKIs are promising drugs that could allow for tailored treatment designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Cansouline
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tours University Hospital, 37170 Chambray-Lès-Tours, France; (X.C.); (B.L.)
- Nutrition, Croissance et Cancer, INSERM UMR 1069, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France;
| | - Béatrice Lipan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tours University Hospital, 37170 Chambray-Lès-Tours, France; (X.C.); (B.L.)
| | - Damien Sizaret
- Department of Pathology, Tours University Hospital, 37170 Chambray-Lès-Tours, France;
| | - Anne Tallet
- Platform of Solid Tumor Molecular Genetics, Tours University, 37000 Tours, France;
| | - Christophe Vandier
- Nutrition, Croissance et Cancer, INSERM UMR 1069, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France;
| | - Delphine Carmier
- Department of Pneumology, Tours University Hospital, 37000 Tours, France;
| | - Antoine Legras
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tours University Hospital, 37170 Chambray-Lès-Tours, France; (X.C.); (B.L.)
- Nutrition, Croissance et Cancer, INSERM UMR 1069, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-2474-746-36
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
ADAURA: The Splash of Osimertinib in Adjuvant EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Oncol Ther 2022; 10:13-22. [PMID: 35294773 PMCID: PMC9098707 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-022-00190-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations revolutionized the diagnostic and treatment algorithm of this subset of patients almost two decades ago. Since then, a number of trials have evaluated the role of TKI therapy in early-stage disease, with encouraging disease-free survival (DFS) results but lack of a survival advantage. ADAURA, a phase III trial evaluating 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib versus placebo in patients harbouring EGFR mutations with completely resected stage IB–IIIA NSCLC, recently reported a profound DFS benefit (hazard ratio 0.21), favourable quality of life and reduction in the risk of brain metastases. These results led to osimertinib’s fast track approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, with this drug thus becoming the first EGFR-TKI approved for the treatment of early-stage disease. However, the key endpoint of overall survival remains immature and questions around indication (i.e. stage, need for adjuvant chemotherapy), optimal treatment duration, biomarkers of response and cost-effectiveness remain to be answered. In this article, we critically appraise the findings of ADAURA and discuss future challenges.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mielgo-Rubio X, Martín M, Remon J, Higuera O, Calvo V, Jarabo JR, Conde E, Luna J, Provencio M, De Castro J, López-Ríos F, Hernando-Trancho F, Couñago F. Targeted therapy moves to earlier stages of non-small-cell lung cancer: emerging evidence, controversies and future challenges. Future Oncol 2021; 17:4011-4025. [PMID: 34337973 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-1255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer mortality and a serious health problem despite the numerous advances made in the last decade and the rapid advance of research in this field. In recent years, there has been a decrease in mortality from lung cancer coinciding with the approval times of targeted therapy. To date, targeted therapy has been used in the context of advanced disease in clinical practice, with great benefits in survival and quality of life. The next step will be to incorporate targeted therapy into the treatment of earlier stages of non-small-cell lung cancer, and there is already a randomized trial showing a disease-free survival benefit. However, there are many questions that need to be resolved first. In the present review, the authors discuss the findings of published reports and ongoing clinical trials assessing the role of targeted therapies in nonmetastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xabier Mielgo-Rubio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Budapest 1 Alcorcón, Madrid 28922, Spain
| | - Margarita Martín
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, M-607, km. 9, 100, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Jordi Remon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Hospital HM Delfos, HM Hospitales, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oliver Higuera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - Virginia Calvo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro Hospital, Joaquín Rodrigo 1, Majadahonda, Madrid 28222, Spain
| | - José Ramón Jarabo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Calle del Profesor Martín Lagos, s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Esther Conde
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid 28041, Spain
| | - Javier Luna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Oncohealth Institute, Avda. Reyes Católicos 2, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Mariano Provencio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro Hospital, Joaquín Rodrigo 1, Majadahonda, Madrid 28222, Spain
| | - Javier De Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - Fernando López-Ríos
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid 28041, Spain
| | - Florentino Hernando-Trancho
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Calle del Profesor Martín Lagos, s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid 28223, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid 28003, Spain.,Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón 28670, Spain
| |
Collapse
|