Surgery of primary lung carcinoid tumors at metastatic stage: A national study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors (GTE) and ENDOCAN-RENATEN network

The outcome following surgery for patients with primary lung neuroendocrine tumors at metastatic stage remains poorly characterized. We conducted a retrospective national study including patients with metastatic lung neuroendocrine tumors at diagnosis. We performed a safety study to evaluate major morbidity and mortality of surgical resection of the primary tumor and compared patients in the operative to the nonoperative group. A total of 155 patients were included: 41 in the operative group and 114 in the nonoperative group, median age was 64 years. Metastases were mainly located in the liver (74.2%) and the bone (49.7%). The primary endpoint was met as the rate of major complications was 4.9% and there was no postoperative mortality. In the operative group 42.5% of patients had improvement of their pulmonary symptoms versus 14.4% in the nonoperative group. The median overall survival was not reached in the operative group and was 4.3 years (95% CI [3.5;4.9]) in the nonoperative group (univariate analysis, HR = 0.42 95% CI [0.23-0.77], p = .002). After multivariate analysis, only an ECOG-PS ≥1 (vs. 0, HR = 2.44, 95% CI [1.46;4.07], p = .001) and >1 metastatic site (vs. 1; HR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.06;3.16], p = .030) remained significantly associated with overall survival. The resection of the primary tumor was not significantly associated with overall survival (HR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.32;1.24], p = .183). In conclusion, surgery of primary lung neuroendocrine tumors at metastatic stage is a safe option that should be considered in selected patients in order to improve symptoms with a view to improving their quality of life. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of surgery on survival.

EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer at Surgical Stages: What Is the Place for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors?

Simple Summary

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are drugs targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor. In lung cancer, they are used to treat advanced EGFR-mutant diseases, and more recently, one has been approved for adjuvant therapy. Even though publications on the topic are numerous, conclusions are difficult to interpret and are sometimes contradictory. We therefore reviewed the literature in order to present an overview of up-to-date data regarding the adjuvant and neoadjuvant use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with particular attention given to their benefits, proven or expected, as well as what challenges could be faced when entering them as protocols in standard care.

Abstract

The ADAURA trial has been significant for the perception of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as a tool for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It produced such great insight that the main TKI, Osimertinib, was rapidly integrated into international guidelines for adjuvant use. However, EGFR-mutant NSCLC is a complex entity and has various targeting drugs, and the benefits for patients might not be as clear as they seem. We reviewed trials and meta-analyses considering TKI adjuvant and neoadjuvant use. We also explored the influence of mutation variability and financial evaluations. We found that TKIs often show disease-free survival (DFS) benefits, yet studies have struggled to improve the overall survival (OS); however, the results from the literature might be confusing because of variability in the stages and mutations. The safety profiles and adverse events are acceptable, but costs remain high and accessibility might not be optimal. TKIs are promising drugs that could allow for tailored treatment designs.