KRAS (but not BRAF) mutations in ovarian serous borderline tumour are associated with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma

Immunohistochemistry Markers in Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Neoplasms: a Comprehensive Review

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has emerged as a crucial tool in diagnosing and managing ovarian cancer, offering invaluable insights into tumor biology and guiding therapeutic decisions. The intricate histopathological landscape of ovarian cancer presents challenges in accurate diagnosis and classification. IHC offers a complementary approach, aiding in the characterization of tumor subtypes, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response. By targeting specific biomarkers, IHC enables the identification of diverse histological features and molecular alterations associated with ovarian malignancies. The integration of IHC into routine diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy, aids in the subclassification of ovarian tumors, and facilitates personalized treatment strategies. Emphasis is placed on the judicious selection of antibody panels tailored to specific clinical scenarios, ensuring optimal utilization of resources and minimizing diagnostic pitfalls. Overall, this review underscores the pivotal role of IHC in refining the diagnosis, prognostication, and management of ovarian cancer, highlighting its significance in the era of precision medicine. By leveraging the molecular insights provided by IHC, clinicians and pathologists can optimize patient care and improve outcomes in ovarian cancer management.

A case of malignant transformation of a serous borderline ovarian tumor effectively treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination

We describe a patient diagnosed with a metastatic adenocarcinoma of Müllerian origin, harboring a BRAF V600E mutation, ten years after being treated for a serous borderline tumor (SBOT). While BRAF mutations in the setting of SBOTs are common, they have been typically associated with a low chance of transformation or recurrence. The therapeutic approach, which combined hormone inhibition with receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (dabrafenib and trametinib), has demonstrated notable and enduring efficacy. This is clinically evidenced through serial PET-CT scans with sustained responses and extended progression-free survival, and serologically confirmed by monitoring CA-125 levels. This case demonstrates the critical role of early next-generation sequencing in detecting actionable molecular changes in rare cancers and possible metastases. It provides valuable insights into treating uncommon Müllerian adenocarcinomas and underscores the importance of targeted therapies in achieving long-lasting treatment outcomes.

High-grade Anaplastic Transformation of Ovarian Serous Borderline Tumor: A Distinctive Morphology With Abundant Dense Eosinophilic Cytoplasm and Dismal Prognosis

Ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBTs) have a generally favorable prognosis. Although the risk of progression to low-grade serous carcinoma is well documented, progression to high-grade carcinoma is rare. We report the clinicopathologic features of seven SBTs, each associated with the presence of a morphologically unique high-grade component with an extremely dismal prognosis. All of the SBTs exhibited typical hierarchical branching and scattered eosinophilic cells, whereas the high-grade component consisted of a profuse proliferation of epithelioid cells with abundant dense, eosinophilic cytoplasm, variable nuclear pleomorphism, and evident loss of WT1, estrogen receptor, and p16 positivity. In most cases, the SBT demonstrated an abrupt transition to the high-grade component, but one patient initially presented with the usual SBT and developed a recurrent disease that was composed entirely of the high-grade component. Targeted next-generation sequencing revealed identical driver mutations in both the SBT and high-grade components (BRAF in 3, KRAS in 1), confirming clonality. Three cases, in addition, harbored telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations in both components. One case, despite insufficient material for sequencing, was BRAF V600E-positive by immunohistochemistry. Most patients with available follow-up data died within 9 months of diagnosis. This study confirms prior reports of ovarian SBT transformation to high-grade carcinoma and further characterizes a distinct subset with abundant dense eosinophilic cytoplasm and an extremely dismal prognosis. The presence of BRAF mutations in a major subset of these tumors questions the notion that BRAF is associated with senescent eosinophilic cells and improved outcomes in SBT. The role of the additional telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations merits further investigation.

Targeting BRAF pathway in low-grade serous ovarian cancer

Mutations in genes encoding for proteins along the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway have been detected in a variety of tumor entities including ovarian carcinomas. In the recent years, several inhibitors of this pathway have been developed, whose antitumor potential is currently being assessed in different clinical trials. Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma, is a rare gynecological tumor which shows favorable overall survival, compared to the general ovarian cancer population, but worrying resistance to conventional chemotherapies. The clinical behavior of low grade serous ovarian carcinoma reflects the different gene profile compared to high-grade serous carcinoma: KRAS/BRAF mutations. BRAF inhibitors as single agents were approved for the treatment of BRAF mutated tumors. Nevertheless, many patients face progressive disease. The understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to BRAF inhibitors therapy and preclinical studies showing that BRAF and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors combined therapy delays the onset of resistance compared to BRAF inhibitor single agent, led to the clinical investigation of combined therapy. The aim of this paper is to review the efficacy and safety of the combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors on ovarian carcinomas, in particularly focusing on low grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Eosinophilic Cells in Ovarian Borderline Serous Tumors as a Predictor of BRAF Mutation

According to recent reports, ovarian serous borderline tumor (SBT) harboring the BRAF V600E mutation is associated with a lower risk of progression to low-grade serous carcinoma. Preliminary observations suggest that there may be an association between eosinophilic cells (ECs) and the above-mentioned mutation, so this study aimed to evaluate interobserver reproducibility for assessing ECs. Forty-two samples of SBTs were analyzed for ECs with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Immunohistochemical staining and genetic pro-filing were performed in all cases to verify the BRAF V600E mutation. A BRAF V600E mutation was found in 19 of 42 (45%) cases. Inter-observer reproducibility in the assessment of ECs was substantial (κ = 0.7). The sensitivity and specificity for predicting the mutation were 79% and 91%, respectively. Patients with BRAF-mutated SBTs were significantly younger than those without mutation (p = 0.005). SBTs with BRAF mutation were less likely to be accompanied by non-invasive implants than wild-type SBT: 12% (2/17) versus 33% (6/18). Seven cases were excluded due to incomplete cytoreductive surgery. Nevertheless, Fisher's exact test showed no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.228). Overall, this study strengthens the idea that ECs in ovarian SBTs may represent a mutation with prognostic significance, which can serve as a primary screening test for BRAF V600E mutation in this pathologic entity.

Molecular landscape of borderline ovarian tumours: A systematic review

Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) show intriguing characteristics distinguishing them from other ovarian tumours. The aim of the systematic review was to analyse the spectrum of molecular changes found in BOTs and discuss their significance in the context of the overall therapeutic approach. The systematic review included articles published between 2000 and 2023 in the databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. After a detailed analysis of the available publications, we qualified for the systematic review: 28 publications on proto-oncogenes: BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, ERBB2, and PIK3CA, 20 publications on tumour suppressor genes: BRCA1/2, ARID1A, CHEK2, PTEN, 4 on adhesion molecules: CADM1, 8 on proteins: B-catenin, claudin-1, and 5 on glycoproteins: E-Cadherin. In addition, in the further part of the systematic review, we included eight publications on microsatellite instability and three describing loss of heterozygosity in BOT. Molecular changes found in BOTs can vary on a case-by-case basis, identifying carcinogenic mutations through molecular analysis and developing targeted therapies represent significant advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian malignancies. Molecular studies have contributed significantly to our understanding of BOT pathogenesis, but substantial research is still required to elucidate the relationship between ovarian neoplasms and extraneous disease, identify accurate prognostic indicators, and develop targeted therapeutic approaches.

Molecular Pathology of Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms: Predictive, Prognostic, and Emerging Biomarkers

This review focuses on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in the context of their morphologic classifications. Currently, most clinically actionable molecular findings are reported in high-grade serous carcinomas; however, the data on less common tumor types are rapidly accelerating. Overall, the advances in genomic knowledge over the last decade highlight the significance of integrating molecular findings with morphology in ovarian epithelial tumors for a wide-range of clinical applications, from assistance in diagnosis to predicting response to therapy.

Amplification of Hippo Signaling Pathway Genes Is Governed and Implicated in the Serous Subtype-Specific Ovarian Carcino-Genesis

Among women, ovarian cancer ranks as the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths. This study examined the impact of Hippo signaling pathway on ovarian carcinogenesis. Therefore, the signatures related to Hippo signaling pathway were derived from the molecular signatures database (MSigDB) and were used for further analysis. The Z score-based pathway activation scoring method was employed to investigate the expression patterns of these signatures in the mRNA expression profiles of ovarian cancer cohorts. Compared to other subtype tumors, the results of this study show that the Hippo signaling pathway signatures are dysregulated prominently in serous subtype-specific ovarian carcinogenesis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-based results of the Hippo gene set, yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), and mammalian sterile 20-like kinases 1 (MST1) genes can predict the serous subtype tumors by higher specificity and sensitivity with significant areas under the curve values also further reconfirmed these signaling dysregulations. Moreover, these gene sets were studied further for mutation analysis in the profile of high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma in the cBioPortal database. The OncoPrint results reveal that these Hippo signaling pathway genes are amplified highly during the grade three and stage third or fourth of serous type ovarian tumors. In addition, the results of the Dependency Map (DepMap) plot also clearly show that these genes are amplified significantly across the ovarian cancer cell lines. Finally, overall survival (OS) curve plot investigations also revealed that these gene expressions show poor survival patterns linked to highly expressed conditions in serous subtypes of ovarian cancer patients with significant p-values (p < 0.05). Thus, the current finding would help to develop the targeted therapies treatment for serous subtype ovarian carcinogenesis.

Personalization of Therapy in High-Grade Serous Tubo-Ovarian Cancer-The Possibility or the Necessity?

High-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSTOC) is the most lethal tumor of the female genital tract. The foregoing therapy consists of cytoreduction followed by standard platinum/taxane chemotherapy; alternatively, for primary unresectable tumors, neo-adjuvant platinum/taxane chemotherapy followed by delayed interval cytoreduction. In patients with suboptimal surgery or advanced disease, different forms of targeted therapy have been accepted or tested in clinical trials. Studies on HGSTOC discovered its genetic and proteomic heterogeneity, epigenetic regulation, and the role of the tumor microenvironment. These findings turned attention to the fact that there are several distinct primary tumor subtypes of HGSTOC and the unique biology of primary, metastatic, and recurrent tumors may result in a differential drug response. This results in both chemo-refractoriness of some primary tumors and, what is significantly more frequent and destructive, secondary chemo-resistance of metastatic and recurrent HGSTOC tumors. Treatment possibilities for platinum-resistant disease include several chemotherapeutics with moderate activity and different targeted drugs with difficult tolerable effects. Therefore, the question appears as to why different subtypes of ovarian cancer are predominantly treated based on the same therapeutic schemes and not in an individualized way, adjusted to the biology of a specific tumor subtype and temporal moment of the disease. The paper reviews the genomic, mutational, and epigenetic signatures of HGSTOC subtypes and the tumor microenvironment. The clinical trials on personalized therapy and the overall results of a new, comprehensive approach to personalized therapy for ovarian cancer have been presented and discussed.

Molecular Results and Potential Biomarkers Identified from the Phase 3 MILO/ENGOT-ov11 Study of Binimetinib versus Physician Choice of Chemotherapy in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

We present the results of a post hoc tumor tissue analysis from the phase 3 MILO/ENGOT-ov11 study (NCT01849874).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Mutation/copy-number analysis was performed on tissue obtained pre-randomization. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). Unbiased univariate analysis, Cox regression, and binary logistic regression were used to test associations between mutation status and outcomes, including PFS and binary response by local RECIST 1.1.

RESULTS

MILO/ENGOT-ov11 enrolled 341 patients, ranging in age from 22 to 79, from June, 2013 to April, 2016. Patients were randomized 2:1 to binimetinib or physician's choice of chemotherapy (PCC). The most commonly altered gene was KRAS (33%). In 135 patients treated with binimetinib with response rate (RR) data, other detected MAPK pathway alterations included: NRAS (n = 11, 8.1%), BRAF V600E (n = 8, 5.9%), RAF1 (n = 2, 1.5%), and NF1 (n = 7, 5.2%). In those with and without MAPK pathway alterations, the RRs with binimetinib were 41% and 13%, respectively. PFS was significantly longer in patients with, compared with those without, MAPK pathway alterations treated with binimetinib [HR, 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.79]. There was a nonsignificant trend toward PFS improvement in PCC-treated patients with MAPK pathway alterations compared with those without (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.43-1.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this hypothesis-generating analysis is limited by multiple testing, higher RRs and longer PFS were seen in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) treated with binimetinib, and to a lesser extent in those treated with PCC, who harbored MAPK pathway alterations. Somatic tumor testing should be routinely considered in patients with LGSOC and used as a future stratification factor.

Molecular Status of BRAF Mutation in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Analysis of 57 Cases in the Northeast of Iran

Background & Objective

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most prevalent type of ovarian cancer. Previous studies have elucidated different pathways for the progression of this malignancy. The mutation in the B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) gene, a member of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, plays a role in the development of EOC. The current study aimed to determine the frequency of the BRAF V600E mutation in ovarian serous and mucinous tumors, including borderline and carcinoma subtypes.

Methods

A total of 57 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, including serous borderline tumors (SBTs), low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSCs), high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs), mucinous borderline tumors (MBTs), and mucinous carcinomas, and 57 normal ovarian tissues were collected. The BRAF V600E mutation was analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing.

Results

While 40% of the SBT harbor BRAF mutation, we found no BRAF mutation in the invasive serous carcinoma (P=0.017). Also, there was only 1 BRAF mutation in MBT and no mutation in mucinous carcinomas. In addition, we found no mutation in the control group.

Conclusion

The BRAF mutation is most frequent in borderline tumors but not in invasive serous carcinomas. It seems that 2 different pathways exist for the development of ovarian epithelial neoplasms: one for borderline tumors and the other for high-grade invasive carcinomas. Our study supports this hypothesis. The BRAF mutation is rare in mucinous neoplasms.

KRAS mutation in primary ovarian serous borderline tumors correlates with tumor recurrence

Oncogenic activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway due to KRAS or BRAF gain-of-function mutation is frequently found in ovarian serous borderline tumor (SBT) and their extraovarian implants. We investigated mutational status of KRAS and BRAF of the primary ovarian SBTs that had a high stage presentation in correlation with clinical outcome. Among 39 consecutive primary SBTs with either invasive implants (20 cases) or non-invasive implants (19 cases), KRAS and BRAF mutational analysis was informative in 34 cases. Sixteen cases (47%) harbored a KRAS mutation, while 5 cases (15%) had a BRAF V600E mutation. High-stage disease (IIIC) was seen in 31% (5/16) of patients with a KRAS mutation and 39% (7/18) of patients without a KRAS mutation (p = 0.64). KRAS mutations were present in 9/16 (56%) tumors with invasive implants/LGSC versus 7/18 (39%) tumors with non-invasive implants (p = 0.31). BRAF mutation was seen in 5 cases with non-invasive implants. Tumor recurrence was seen in 31% (5/16) of patients with a KRAS mutation, compared to 6% (1/18) of patients without a KRAS mutation (p = 0.04). A KRAS mutation predicted an adverse disease-free survival (31% survival at 160 months) compared to those with wild-type KRAS (94% at 160 months; log-rank test, p = 0.037; HR 4.47). In conclusion, KRAS mutation in primary ovarian SBTs is significantly associated with a worse disease-free survival, independent of the high tumor stage or histological subtypes of extraovarian implant. KRAS mutation testing of primary ovarian SBT may servce as a useful biomarker for tumor recurrence.

Lymph Node Involvement in Recurrent Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Current Evidence, Controversies, and a Review of the Literature

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) account for 10-20% of epithelial ovarian neoplasms. They are characterized by their lack of destructive stromal invasion. In comparison to invasive ovarian cancers, BOTs occur in younger patients and have better outcome. Serous borderline ovarian tumor (SBOT) represents the most common subtype of BOT. Complete surgical staging is the current standard management but fertility-sparing surgery is an option for SBOT patients who are at reproductive age. While most cases of SBOTs have an indolent course with favorable prognosis, late recurrence and malignant transformation can occur, usually in the form of low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). Thus, assessment of the recurrence risk is essential for the management of those patients. SBOTs can be associated with lymph node involvement (LNI) in up to 30% of patients who undergo lymph node dissection at diagnosis, and whether LNI affects prognosis is controversial. The present review suggests that recurrent SBOTs with LNI have poorer oncological outcomes and highlights the biases due to the scarcity of reports in the literature. Preventing SBOTs from recurring and becoming invasive overtime and a more profound understanding of the underlying mechanisms at play are necessary.

Integrated multi-omic analysis of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma collected from short and long-term survivors

BACKGROUND

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare disease that occurs more frequently in younger women than those with high-grade disease. The current treatment is suboptimal and a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of this disease is required. In this study, we compared the proteogenomic analyses of LGSOCs from short- and long-term survivors (defined as < 40 and > 60 months, respectively). Our goal was to identify novel mutations, proteins, and mRNA transcripts that are dysregulated in LGSOC, particularly in short-term survivors.

METHODS

Initially, targeted sequencing of 409 cancer-related genes was performed on 22 LGSOC and 6 serous borderline ovarian tumor samples. Subsequently, whole-genome sequencing analysis was performed on 14 LGSOC samples (7 long-term survivors and 7 short-term survivors) with matched normal tissue samples. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), quantitative proteomics, and phosphoproteomic analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

We identified single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) (range: 5688-14,833 per sample), insertion and deletion variants (indels) (range: 880-1065), and regions with copy number variants (CNVs) (range: 62-335) among the 14 LGSOC samples. Among all SNVs and indels, 2637 mutation sites were found in the exonic regions. The allele frequencies of the detected variants were low (median12%). The identified recurrent nonsynonymous missense mutations included KRAS, NRAS, EIF1AX, UBR5, and DNM3 mutations. Mutations in DNM3 and UBR5 have not previously been reported in LGSOC. For the two samples, somatic DNM3 nonsynonymous missense mutations in the exonic region were validated using Sanger sequencing. The third sample contained two missense mutations in the intronic region of DNM3, leading to a frameshift mutation detected in RNA transcripts in the RNA-seq data. Among the 14 LGSOC samples, 7754 proteins and 9733 phosphosites were detected by global proteomic analysis. Some of these proteins and signaling pathways, such as BST1, TBXAS1, MPEG1, HBA1, and phosphorylated ASAP1, are potential therapeutic targets.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to use whole-genome sequencing to detect somatic mutations in LGSOCs with matched normal tissues. We detected and validated novel mutations in DNM3, which were present in 3 of the 14 samples analyzed. Additionally, we identified novel indels, regions with CNVs, dysregulated mRNA, dysregulated proteins, and phosphosites that are more prevalent in short-term survivors. This integrated proteogenomic analysis can guide research into the pathogenesis and treatment of LGSOC.

Role of RAS signaling in ovarian cancer

The RAS family of proteins is among the most frequently mutated genes in human malignancies. In ovarian cancer (OC), the most lethal gynecological malignancy, RAS, especially KRAS mutational status at codons 12, 13, and 61, ranges from 6-65% spanning different histo-types. Normally RAS regulates several signaling pathways involved in a myriad of cellular signaling cascades mediating numerous cellular processes like cell proliferation, differentiation, invasion, and death. Aberrant activation of RAS leads to uncontrolled induction of several downstream signaling pathways such as RAF-1/MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase), PI3K phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)/AKT, RalGEFs, Rac/Rho, BRAF (v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B), MEK1 (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1), ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase), PKB (protein kinase B) and PKC (protein kinase C) involved in cell proliferation as well as maintenance pathways thereby driving tumorigenesis and cancer cell propagation. KRAS mutation is also known to be a biomarker for poor outcome and chemoresistance in OC. As a malignancy with several histotypes showing varying histopathological characteristics, we focus on reviewing recent literature showcasing the involvement of oncogenic RAS in mediating carcinogenesis and chemoresistance in OC and its subtypes.

Genomic profiling in low grade serous ovarian cancer: Identification of novel markers for disease diagnosis and therapy

OBJECTIVES

Low grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) differs from high grade serous in terms of pathogenesis, molecular, genetic, and clinical features. Molecular studies have been hampered by small sample sizes, heterogenous histology, and lack of comprehensive testing. We sought to molecularly profile LGSOC in a homogenously tested, histologically confirmed cohort.

METHODS

Using hot-spot and whole exome next generation sequencing (NGS), fusion gene analysis interrogating RNA, fragment analysis, in situ hybridization and/or immunohistochemistry, 179 specimens were evaluated by Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). A second independent histologic review confirmed histology in 153 specimens.

RESULTS

Most frequently mutated genes (5% or greater) were members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway: KRAS (23.7%, n = 36), NRAS (11.2%, n = 19), NF1 (7.9%, n = 5), and BRAF (6.6%, n = 10). Class III mutations were seen in 3 of 10 BRAF mutations while 7 were Class I V600E. Overall, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression was 80.2% (n = 130) and 27.8% (n = 45), respectively. Of those that were hormone negative, nearly 50% contained KRAS or NF1 mutations. None were NRAS mutated. Markers of response to immunotherapy were low to absent.

CONCLUSION

BRAF mutations were seen to be lower than those traditionally reported. With increased MAPK activation resulting in ligand independent activation of ERα, a role of combination therapy with hormonal and targeted therapy should be considered as 49.2% of hormone negative specimens were KRAS or NF1 mutated. Absence of immunotherapy biomarkers suggest limited benefit to immunotherapeutic agents.

Advanced low grade serous ovarian cancer: A retrospective analysis of surgical and chemotherapeutic management in two high volume oncological centers

Simple summary

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) represents an uncommon histotype of serous ovarian cancer (accounting for approximately 5% of all ovarian cancer) with a distinct behavior compared to its high-grade serous counterpart, characterized by a better prognosis and low response rate to chemotherapeutic agents. Similar to high-grade serous ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery is considered crucial for patient survival. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the outcomes of women affected by advanced stages (III–IV FIGO) of LGSOC from two high-volume oncological centers for ovarian neoplasm. In particular, we sought to evaluate the impact on survival outcomes of optimal cytoreductive surgery [i.e., residual disease (RD) &lt;10 mm at the end of surgery]. The results of our work confirm the role of complete cytoreduction (i.e., no evidence of disease after surgery) in the survival of patients and even the positive prognostic role of a minimal RD (i.e., &lt;10 mm), whenever complete cytoreduction cannot be achieved.

Background

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare entity with different behavior compared to high-grade serous (HGSOC). Because of its general low chemosensitivity, complete cytoreductive surgery with no residual disease is crucial in advanced stage LGSOC. We evaluated the impact of optimal cytoreduction on survival outcome both at first diagnosis and at recurrence.

Methods

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced LGSOCs who underwent cytoreductive surgery in two oncological centers from January 1994 to December 2018. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using the Greenwood formula.

Results

A total of 92 patients were included (median age was 47 years, IQR 35–64). The median overall survival (OS) was 142.3 months in patients with no residual disease (RD), 86.4 months for RD 1–10 mm and 35.2 months for RD &gt;10 mm (p = 0.002). Progression-free survival (PFS) was inversely related to RD after primary cytoreductive surgery (RD = 0 vs RD = 1–10 mm vs RD &gt;10 mm, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, RD 1–10 mm (HR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.30–4.06, p = 0.004), RD &gt;10 mm (HR = 3.89, 95% CI 1.92–7.88, p = 0.0004), FIGO stage IV (p = 0.001), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (p = 0.010) were independent predictors of PFS. RD &gt;10 mm (HR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.52–6.46, p = 0.004), FIGO stage IV (p &lt;0.0001) and NACT (p = 0.030) were significantly associated with a lower OS.

Conclusions

Optimal cytoreductive surgery improves survival outcomes in advanced stage LGSOCs. When complete debulking is impossible, a RD &lt;10 mm confers better OS compared to an RD &gt;10 mm in this setting of patients.

Cancer Stem Cells in Ovarian Cancer-A Source of Tumor Success and a Challenging Target for Novel Therapies

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal neoplasm of the female genital organs. Despite indisputable progress in the treatment of ovarian cancer, the problems of chemo-resistance and recurrent disease are the main obstacles for successful therapy. One of the main reasons for this is the presence of a specific cell population of cancer stem cells. The aim of this review is to show the most contemporary knowledge concerning the biology of ovarian cancer stem cells (OCSCs) and their impact on chemo-resistance and prognosis in ovarian cancer patients, as well as to present the treatment options targeted exclusively on the OCSCs. The review presents data concerning the role of cancer stem cells in general and then concentrates on OCSCs. The surface and intracellular OCSCs markers and their meaning both for cancer biology and clinical prognosis, signaling pathways specifically activated in OCSCs, the genetic and epigenetic regulation of OCSCs function including the recent studies on the non-coding RNA regulation, cooperation between OCSCs and the tumor microenvironment (ovarian cancer niche) including very specific environment such as ascites fluid, the role of shear stress, autophagy and metabolic changes for the function of OCSCs, and finally mechanisms of OCSCs escape from immune surveillance, are described and discussed extensively. The possibilities of anti-OCSCs therapy both in experimental settings and in clinical trials are presented, including the recent II phase clinical trials and immunotherapy. OCSCs are a unique population of cancer cells showing a great plasticity, self-renewal potential and resistance against anti-cancer treatment. They are responsible for the progression and recurrence of the tumor. Several completed and ongoing clinical trials have tested different anti-OCSCs drugs which, however, have shown unsatisfactory efficacy in most cases. We propose a novel approach to ovarian cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: The Current Status

Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) of the ovary is a rare histological subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. It has distinct clinical behavior and a specific molecular profile. Compared with high-grade serous carcinoma, this tumor presents at a younger age, has an indolent course, and is associated with prolonged survival. LGSC can arise de novo or originate following a serous borderline tumor (SBT). Pathological differentiation between LGSC and other ovarian carcinoma histological subtypes is fundamental. Several factors might influence the overall outcome, such as the age at diagnosis, current smoking, elevated body mass index, mutational status, hormonal receptors’ expression, and Ki-67 proliferation index. Surgery is the main treatment option in LGSC, and efforts must be maximized to achieve a microscopic residual in metastatic disease. Despite being relatively chemo-resistant, adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care in LGSC. Hormonal maintenance therapy after adjuvant chemotherapy results in improved outcomes. Treatment options for disease recurrence include secondary cytoreductive surgery, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, and clinical trials. Advancements in genomic studies and targeted therapies are expected to change the treatment landscape in LGSC.

Somatic Mutational Profile of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma and Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma in Young and Elderly Patients: Similarities and Divergences

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer (HGSOC) are aggressive malignancies that share similarities; however, different ages of onset may reflect distinct tumor behaviors. Thus, our aim was to compare somatic mutations in potential driver genes in 109 TNBC and 81 HGSOC from young (Y ≤ 40 years) and elderly (E ≥ 75 years) patients. Methods: Open access mutational data (WGS or WES) were collected for TNBC and HGSOC patients. Potential driver genes were those that were present in the Cancer Gene Census—CGC, the Candidate Cancer Gene Database—CCGD, or OncoKB and those that were considered pathogenic in variant effect prediction tools. Results: Mutational signature 3 (homologous repair defects) was the only gene that was represented in all four subgroups. The median number of mutated CGCs per sample was similar in HGSOC (Y:3 vs. E:4), but it was higher in elderly TNBC than it was in young TNBC (Y:3 vs. E:6). At least 90% of the samples from TNBC and HGSOC from Y and E patients presented at least one known affected TSG. Besides TP53, which was mutated in 67–83% of the samples, the affected TSG in TP53 wild-type samples were NF1 (yHGSOC and yTNBC), PHF6 (eHGSOC and yTNBC), PTEN, PIK3R1 and ZHFX3 (yTNBC), KMT2C, ARID1B, TBX3, and ATM (eTNBC). A few samples only presented one affected oncogene (but no TSG): KRAS and TSHR in eHGSOC and RAC1 and PREX2 (a regulator of RAC1) in yTNBC. At least ⅔ of the tumors presented mutated oncogenes associated with tumor suppressor genes; the Ras and/or PIK3CA signaling pathways were altered in 15% HGSOC and 20–35% TNBC (Y vs. E); DNA repair genes were mutated in 19–33% of the HGSOC tumors but were more frequently mutated in E-TNBC (56%). However, in HGSOC, 9.5% and 3.3% of the young and elderly patients, respectively, did not present any tumors with an affected CGC nor did 4.65% and none of the young and elderly TNBC patients. Conclusion: Most HGSOC and TNBC from young and elderly patients present an affected TSG, mainly TP53, as well as mutational signature 3; however, a few tumors only present an affected oncogene or no affected cancer-causing genes.

Circulating Exosomal miRNAs as Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Failure to detect early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a major contributing factor to its low survival rate. Increasing evidence suggests that different subtypes of EOC may behave as distinct diseases due to their different cells of origins, histology and treatment responses. Therefore, the identification of EOC subtype-specific biomarkers that can early detect the disease should be clinically beneficial. Exosomes are extracellular vesicles secreted by different types of cells and carry biological molecules, which play important roles in cell-cell communication and regulation of various biological processes. Multiple studies have proposed that exosomal miRNAs present in the circulation are good biomarkers for non-invasive early detection of cancer. In this review, the potential use of exosomal miRNAs as early detection biomarkers for EOCs and their accuracy are discussed. We also review the differential expression of circulating exosomal miRNAs and cell-free miRNAs between different biofluid sources, i.e., plasma and serum, and touch on the issue of endogenous reference miRNA selection. Additionally, the current clinical trials using miRNAs for detecting EOCs are summarized. In conclusion, circulating exosomal miRNAs as the non-invasive biomarkers have a high potential for early detection of EOC and its subtypes, and are likely to be clinically important in the future.

Molecular Pathology of Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms: Predictive, Prognostic, and Emerging Biomarkers

This review focuses on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in the context of their morphologic classifications. Currently, most clinically actionable molecular findings are reported in high-grade serous carcinomas; however, the data on less common tumor types are rapidly accelerating. Overall, the advances in genomic knowledge over the last decade highlight the significance of integrating molecular findings with morphology in ovarian epithelial tumors for a wide-range of clinical applications, from assistance in diagnosis to predicting response to therapy.

Immunohistochemical Biomarkers as a Surrogate of Molecular Analysis in Ovarian Carcinomas: A Review of the Literature

The term "ovarian carcinoma" encompasses at least five different malignant neoplasms: high-grade serous carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma. These five histotypes demonstrated distinctive histological, molecular, and clinical features. The rise of novel target therapies and of a tailored oncological approach has demanded an integrated multidisciplinary approach in the setting of ovarian carcinoma. The need to implement a molecular-based classification in the worldwide diagnostic and therapeutic setting of ovarian cancer demanded a search for easy-to-use and cost-effective molecular-surrogate biomarkers, relying particularly on immunohistochemical analysis. The present review focuses on the role of immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of molecular analysis in the everyday diagnostic approach to ovarian carcinomas.

Multiomics Characterization of Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Identifies Potential Biomarkers of MEK Inhibitor Sensitivity and Therapeutic Vulnerability

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare tumor subtype with high case fatality rates in patients with metastatic disease. There is a pressing need to develop effective treatments using newly available preclinical models for therapeutic discovery and drug evaluation. Here, we use multiomics integration of whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics on 14 LGSOC cell lines to elucidate novel biomarkers and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Comparison of LGSOC cell line data with LGSOC tumor data enabled predictive biomarker identification of MEK inhibitor (MEKi) efficacy, with KRAS mutations found exclusively in MEKi-sensitive cell lines and NRAS mutations found mostly in MEKi-resistant cell lines. Distinct patterns of Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer mutational signatures were identified in MEKi-sensitive and MEKi-resistant cell lines. Deletions of CDKN2A/B and MTAP genes were more frequent in cell lines than tumor samples and possibly represent key driver events in the absence of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations. These LGSOC cell lines were representative models of the molecular aberrations found in LGSOC tumors. For prediction of in vitro MEKi efficacy, proteomic data provided better discrimination than gene expression data. Condensin, minichromosome maintenance, and replication factor C protein complexes were identified as potential treatment targets in MEKi-resistant cell lines. This study suggests that CDKN2A/B or MTAP deficiency may be exploited using synthetically lethal treatment strategies, highlighting the importance of using proteomic data as a tool for molecular drug prediction. Multiomics approaches are crucial to improving our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of LGSOC and applying this information to develop new therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings highlight the utility of global multiomics to characterize LGSOC cell lines as research models, to determine biomarkers of MEKi resistance, and to identify potential novel therapeutic targets.

Tumor Profiling at the Service of Cancer Therapy

Cancer treatment options have evolved significantly in the past few years. From the initial surgical procedures, to the latest next-generation technologies, we are now in the position to analyze and understand tumors in a one-by-one basis and use that to our advantage to provide with individualized treatment options that may increase patient survival. In this review, we will focus on how tumor profiling has evolved over the past decades to deliver more efficient and personalized treatment options, and how novel technologies can help us envisage the future of precision oncology toward a better management and, ultimately, increased survival.

Differences in gynecologic tumor development in Amhr2-Cre mice with KRASG12D or KRASG12V mutations

How different KRAS variants impact tumor initiation and progression in vivo has not been thoroughly examined. We hypothesize that the ability of either KRAS^G12D or KRAS^G12V mutations to initiate tumor formation is context dependent. Amhr2-Cre mice express Cre recombinase in tissues that develop into the fallopian tubes, uterus, and ovaries. We used these mice to conditionally express either the KRAS^G12V/+or KRAS^G12D/+ mutation. Mice with the genotype Amhr2-Cre Pten^(fl/fl) Kras^G12D/+(G12D mice) had abnormal follicle structures and developed low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas with 100% penetrance within 18 weeks. In contrast, mice with the genotype Amhr2-Cre Pten^(fl/fl) Kras^G12V/+ (G12V mice) had normal follicle structures, and about 90% of them developed uterine tumors with diverse histological features resembling those of leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Granulosa cell tumors also developed in G12V mice. Differences in cell-signaling pathways in the uterine tissues of G12D and G12V mice were identified using RNA sequencing and reverse-phase protein array analyses. We found that CTNNB1, IL1A, IL1B, TNF, TGFB1, APP, and IL6 had the higher activity in G12V mice than in G12D mice. These mouse models will be useful for studying the differences in signaling pathways driven by Kras^G12V/+ or Kras^G12D/+ mutations to aid development of targeted therapies for specific KRAS mutant variants. Our leiomyoma model driven by the Kras^G12V/+ mutation will also be useful in deciphering the malignant progression from leiomyoma to leiomyosarcoma.

[Borderline ovarian tumours: CNGOF Guidelines for clinical practice - Biopathology of ovarian borderline tumors]

OBJECTIVES

Ovarian borderline tumors (OBT) represent a heterogeneous group of lesions with specific management for each histological subtype. Thus, the correct histological diagnosis is mandatory.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

References were searched by PubMed from January 2000 to January 2018 and original articles in French and English literature were selected.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

OBT should be classified according to the last WHO classification. Any micro-invasion (foci<5mm) or microcarcinoma (foci<5mm with nuclear atypia and desmoplastic stromal reaction) should be indicated in the pathology report. In case of serous OBT, variants (classical or the micropapillary/cribriform) should be indicated (grade C). The peritoneal implants associated with OBT, should be classified as invasive or noninvasive, according to the extension into the underlying adipous tissue. If no adipous tissue is seen the term undetermined should be used (grade B). In case of mucinous OBT bilateral and/or with peritoneal implants or peritoneal pseudomyxoma a search for primitive gastrointestinal, appendiceal or biliopancreatic tumor should be performed (grade C). In case of OBT, a thorough sampling of the tumor is recommended, with 1 block/cm and 2 blocks/cm in case of mucinous OBT, serous OBT micropapillary variant, OBT with intraepithelial carcinoma or/and micro-invasion. Peritoneal implants should be examined in toto. Omentum without macroscopic lesion should be sampled in 4 to 6 blocks (grade C). In case of ovarian cyst suspicious for OBT, fine needle aspiration is not recommended (grade C). In case of ovarian tumor suspicious for OBT, intraoperative examination should be performed by a gynecological pathologist (grade C).

Morphological and molecular heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancer: Therapeutic implications

Ovarian epithelial cancer (OEC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Despite current chemotherapeutic and surgical options, this high lethality can be attributed to multiple factors, including late-stage presentation. In order to optimize OEC treatment, it is important to highlight that it is composed of five main subtypes: high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC), endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EOC), ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCOC), and mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC). These subtypes differ in their precursor lesions, as well as in epidemiological, morphological, molecular and clinical features. OEC is one of the tumours in which most pathogenic germline mutations have been identified. Accordingly, up to 20% OC show alterations in BRCA1/2 genes, and also, although with a lower frequency, in other low penetrance genes associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), mismatch repair genes (Lynch syndrome) and TP53. The most important prognostic factor is the 2014 FIGO staging, while older age is also associated with worse survival. HGSOC in all stages and CCC and MOC in advanced stages have the worse prognosis among histological types. Molecular markers have emerged as prognostic factors, particularly mutations in BRCA1/2, which are associated with a better outcome. Regarding treatment, whereas a proportion of HGSOC is sensible to platinum-based treatment and PARP inhibitors due to HRD, the rest of the histological types are relatively chemoresistant. New treatments based in specific molecular alterations are being tested in different histological types. In addition, immunotherapy could be an option, especially for EOC carrying mismatch repair deficiency or POLE mutations.

•

The five different histological types have different precursor lesions and epidemiological, morphological, genetic, epigenetic and clinical features.

•

Histological type is an important prognostic factor.

•

Drugs targeting homologous recombination deficiency have been approved for treatment.

•

The use of immunotherapy is limited due to lack of predictive biomarkers

Evaluation of MTAP immunohistochemistry loss of expression in ovarian serous borderline tumors as a potential marker for prognosis and progression

INTRODUCTION

Serous borderline tumors (SBT) are the most common subtype of ovarian borderline tumors with excellent clinical course. However, they can recur or progress to low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) in a small proportion of the cases. Beside BRAF and KRAS mutations, copy number alterations (CNA), particularly loss of chromosome 9p21 locus which results in deletion of genes CDKN2A and MTAP, have been suggested to be involved in disease progression. MTAP immunohistochemistry recently has been introduced for mesothelioma as a reliable surrogate marker for the homozygous deletion of chromosome 9p21 locus. Therefore, in the current study, we aimed to evaluate the MTAP loss of expression in serous borderline tumors and low-grade serous carcinomas to identify if it can be used as a marker for prognosis and progression.

METHOD

Eighty-four total cases of ovarian serous lesions, including 21 cases of serous cystadenomas, 21 cases of serous borderline tumors, 12 cases of low-grade serous carcinomas and 30 cases of high-grade serous carcinomas were selected. MTAP immunohistochemistry was performed on the representative blocks and cytoplasmic staining was used for interpretation. The cases were labeled as positive (retained) if MTAP showed cytoplasmic granular staining and negative (loss of expression) if negative cytoplasmic staining was observed in the presence of positive internal control.

RESULT

Ten of 21 cases of serous borderline tumors showed loss of MTAP expression (48%). Among those, 7 cases were bilateral, 2 cases had micropapillary features, one case had supraclavicular and cervical lymph node involvement by serous borderline tumor and 2 cases had progression to low-grade serous carcinoma, including one of micropapillary tumors. Also 8 out of 12 cases of LGSCs showed MTAP loss of expression (66%). Only 4 of 30 cases of high-grade serous carcinomas (13%) and none of the serous cystadenoma cases showed loss of expression of MTAP.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first description of MTAP immunohistochemistry in serous borderline tumors and low-grade serous carcinomas. Our study was limited due to small sample size. However, it showed an association between MTAP loss of expression and adverse clinical behavior in ovarian serous borderline tumors. This supports the role for further investigations in larger series to evaluate the role of MTAP stain as a prognostic marker in these neoplasms.

Serous borderline tumor of the ovary with isolated cardiophrenic lymph node spread at diagnosis

•

Serous borderline tumor outside of the peritoneal cavity is rare.

•

Involvement of cardiophrenic lymph nodes with serous borderline tumor can occur.

•

Preoperative imaging may aid surgical planning even in serous borderline tumor cases.

•

Sequencing can help confirm a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor at distant sites.

A H-REV107 Peptide Inhibits Tumor Growth and Interacts Directly with Oncogenic KRAS Mutants

Kirsten-RAS (KRAS) has been the target of drugs because it is the most mutated gene in human cancers. Because of the low affinity of drugs for KRAS mutations, it was difficult to target these tumor genes directly. We found a direct interaction between KRAS G12V and tumor suppressor novel H-REV107 peptide with high binding affinity. We report the first crystal structure of an oncogenic mutant, KRAS G12V-H-REV107. This peptide was shown to interact with KRAS G12V in the guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-bound inactive state and to form a stable complex, blocking the activation function of KRAS. We showed that the peptide acted as an inhibitor of mutant KRAS targets by [α-³²P] guanosine triphosphate (GTP) binding assay. The H-REV107 peptide inhibited pancreatic cancer and colon cancer cell lines in cell proliferation assay. Specially, the H-REV107 peptide can suppress pancreatic tumor growth by reduction of tumor volume and weight in xenotransplantation mouse models. Overall, the results presented herein will facilitate development of novel drugs for inhibition of KRAS mutations in cancer patients.

The Diagnosis, Treatment, Prognosis and Molecular Pathology of Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Current Status and Perspectives

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are a type of low malignant potential tumor that is typically associated with better outcomes than ovarian cancer. Indeed, its 10-year survival rate is as high as 95%. However, there is a small subset of patients who experience relapse and eventually die. It has been shown that the prognosis of BOTs was based on pathological diagnosis, the age at diagnosis, pre-operative carbohydrate antigen 125 level, invasive implants, and micropapillary patterns. Now the molecular-targeted therapy and molecular-genetic diagnosis have developed into a form of precision medicine. Recent studies on extensive molecular characterizations and molecular pathological mechanisms of BOTs have helped us understand the genomic landscapes of BOTs, and therefore BOTs could be reclassified into biologically and clinically more accurate and effective subtypes. The purpose of this review is to summarize current status for the diagnosis and treatment of BOTs and to describe the research progress on molecular pathologies, with a goal of providing a theoretical perspective for the diagnosis and treatment of BOTs.

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Features of Paired Cases of Metachronous Ovarian Serous Borderline Tumor and Subsequent Serous Carcinoma

Although risk factors have been established for the development of serous carcinoma after a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor (SBT), comprising atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST) (ie, conventional SBT) and noninvasive low-grade serous carcinoma (niLGSC) (ie, micropapillary SBT), subsequent invasive carcinoma still occurs in a subset of women who are not at increased risk. Whether subsequent serous carcinoma in women with a prior SBT represents malignant progression/recurrence or an independent primary tumor is unclear, and the combined clinicopathologic and molecular features of SBTs and their subsequent carcinomas have not been fully characterized. In this study, we analyzed a cohort of 42 women initially diagnosed with SBT who subsequently developed serous carcinoma of a total of 1025 cases of ovarian SBT from a nationwide population-based cohort. Review of the diagnostic slides was performed from this subset of SBTs and matched metachronous invasive serous carcinomas (39 low grade, 3 high grade). DNA was extracted from tissue blocks available for 41 cases (both SBT and carcinoma, n=36; SBT only, n=3; carcinoma only, n=2). Samples were subjected to digital droplet PCR to analyze mutation hotspots in KRAS (codon 12) and BRAF (V600E), which are frequently found in low-grade serous tumors. Eighty-one percent of SBTs (34/42) were APST, and 19% (8/42) were niLGSC. Forty percent of cases (17/42) were FIGO stage I, the majority of which were APST (14/17; 82%). The median time to development of carcinoma was 9 years (range, 0.6 to 25 y). Mutations in SBTs were distributed as follows: 5/39 (13%) BRAF mutant, 22/39 (56%) KRAS mutant, and 12/39 (31%) wild-type for both genes. There was a significant relationship between SBT gene mutation and histologic type, with BRAF mutations occurring exclusively in APST and a higher frequency of niLGSC among SBTs wild-type for BRAF and KRAS (P=0.01). The diffuse presence of tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm was significantly associated with the BRAF mutation (P=0.001). Mutational analyses of matched SBT/carcinoma pairs revealed concordant profiles in 33/36 (92%) cases, of which 19 (53%) were KRAS mutant, 4 (11%) were BRAF mutant, and 10 (28%) were wild type for both genes. The 3 discordant cases consisted of a wild-type niLGSC with a subsequent BRAF-mutant invasive LGSC, a KRAS-mutant APST with a KRAS-mutant LGSC, and a BRAF-mutant APST with subsequent development of a KRAS-mutant high-grade serous carcinoma. In conclusion, some women with SBTs can subsequently develop serous carcinoma, occasionally over 10 years later. Most subsequent carcinomas are low grade, but a small subset can be high grade. The type of gene mutation in SBT correlates with various histologic features. While most cases of serous carcinoma developing after a diagnosis of SBT probably represent tumor progression, a minority are independent primary tumors, presumably arising from endosalpingiosis.

High Frequency of PIK3CA Mutations in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinomas of Japanese Patients

The frequency of KRAS/BRAF mutations associated with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSC)/serous borderline tumors (SBTs) in Japan is unknown. We aimed to identify genetic variations in KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and ERBB2 in LGSC/SBT/serous cystadenomas (SCAs) in a Japanese population. We performed a mutation analysis (by Sanger sequencing) of 33 cases of LGSC/SBT/SCA and 4 cases of LGSC with synchronous SBTs using microdissected paraffin-embedded sections. Immunohistochemistry of p53 and ARID1A was also performed. The frequency of oncogenic mutations in PIK3CA was 60.0% (6/10) in LGSCs, 63.6% (7/11) in SBTs, and 8.3% (1/12) in SCAs. All cases harbored wild-type KRAS. The frequency of BRAF mutations was 20.0% (2/10) in LGSCs, whereas all SBTs and SCAs harbored the wild-type allele. The frequency of ERBB2 mutations was 30.0% (3/10) in LGSCs, 0.0% (0/11) in SBTs, and 16.7% (2/12) in SCAs. ARID1A staining was positive in all cases. p53 staining was positive in 0% (0/10) LGSCs, 9.1% (1/11) SBTs, and 0.0% (0/12) SCAs. One LGSC case had two PIK3CA mutations (G1633A and G3149A) in both LGSC and SBT lesions, but a BRAF mutation was detected only in an LGSC lesion. These results suggest that, compared with the values in Western populations (16-54%), the KRAS mutation frequency in LGSCs/SBTs is lower and that of PIK3CA mutations in LGSCs/SBTs is much higher in Japanese populations. Therefore, the main carcinogenesis signaling pathways may be different between Japanese and Western LGSCs. Molecular therapies targeting the PIK3CA/AKT pathway may be effective in LGSCs in Japan.

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A comprehensive literature review

BACKGROUND

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a unique entity with clinical and molecular characteristics distinct from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). To date the majority of research has focused on the more common HGSOC, with treatment recommendations often extrapolated to LGSOC. Women with LGSOC are typically diagnosed younger and have indolent and relatively chemoresistant disease. Recently there have been major research advances in LGSOC.

AIMS

This systematic review describes the epidemiological, clinical and molecular characteristics of LGSOC, with advances in research and novel treatment options also discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 10-year comprehensive systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted, with a total of 132 abstracts read, 89 articles reviewed and 49 included in this review.

RESULTS

This review highlights the clinical and molecular features of LGSOC, current and traditional treatment options and areas of current research into targeted agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Our growing knowledge about LGSOC as a distinct clinical and molecular entity from HGSOC has led to the investigation of more targeted and tailored therapies as their clinical course, optimal management and therapeutic targets differ. There is a need for ongoing collaborative research to provide better treatment options for these patients.

BRAFV600E -mutated ovarian serous borderline tumors are at relatively low risk for progression to serous carcinoma

Ovarian serous borderline tumor (SBT) is a known precursor of low-grade serous carcinoma. While most SBTs are cured surgically, some progress to carcinoma and a risk predictor for malignant relapse is needed to ensure vigilant follow-up and additional treatment. Activating mutations in KRAS or BRAF are present in around 60% of SBTs, but their relative impact on progression is unclear. We performed mutational analysis of KRAS and BRAF on 201 SBTs identified from a longitudinal cohort of SBTs after centralized pathology review. Compared to wildtype and KRAS-mutated SBTs, BRAF-mutated group of SBTs were less likely to exhibit micropapillary variant histology (p < 0.0001), were more frequently Stage I (p = 0.0023) and had a lower prevalence of associated endosalpingiosis (p = 0.0069). The histologic feature of diffuse presence of tumor cells with dense eosinophilic cytoplasm, while significantly associated with the BRAF^V600E mutation (p < 0.0001), is 62% sensitive and 93% specific in identifying tumors with this mutation. After adjusting for age and stage, the risk of subsequent serous carcinoma was lower for SBTs harboring BRAF (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08–0.93), but not KRAS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.45–2.23) mutations, in comparison to wildtype SBTs. This study establishes the potential utility of mutation testing for guiding clinical management of ovarian SBT and underscores the importance of accurate morphologic distinction of micropapillary SBT from SBT with eosinophilic tumor cells, given their disparate prognostic implications.

A Rare Case of Ovarian Serous Borderline Tumor with Brain Metastasis

Background. Serous borderline tumor represents a group of noninvasive tumor of the ovary bridging between benign serous cystadenoma and serous carcinoma. They are commonly seen in younger women and usually have an excellent outcome but seldom show local recurrence (J. F. Leake et al. 1991). Metastasis to the lymph nodes has rarely been reported (M. D. Chamberlin et al., 2001; M. B. Verbruggen et al., 2006). Moreover, the brain is exceptionally a rare metastatic site for ovarian tumor. There is one case of an advanced staged SBT with micropapillary pattern metastasis to the brain recently and by far it is the most distant metastasis reported (M. D. Martin et al., 2017). However, to the best of our knowledge, no report has been documented for a recurrent stage 1 typical SBT metastasizing to the brain.

Low-grade Serous Neoplasia of the Female Genital Tract

Low-grade serous neoplasia of the gynecologic tract includes benign (serous cystadenomas), borderline, and malignant lesions (low-grade serous carcinoma). Classification of these lesions relies on rigorous attention to several pathologic features that determine the prognosis and the need for adjuvant therapy. Risk stratification of serous borderline tumor behavior based on histologic findings and criteria for low-grade serous carcinoma are the primary focus of this article, including the redesignation of invasive implants of serous borderline tumor as low-grade serous carcinoma based on the similar survival rates. The molecular underpinnings of these tumors are also discussed, including their potential for prognostication.

Markers of MEK inhibitor resistance in low-grade serous ovarian cancer: EGFR is a potential therapeutic target

BACKGROUND

Although low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) is rare, case-fatality rates are high as most patients present with advanced disease and current cytotoxic therapies are not overly effective. Recognizing that these cancers may be driven by MAPK pathway activation, MEK inhibitors (MEKi) are being tested in clinical trials. LGSC respond to MEKi only in a subgroup of patients, so predictive biomarkers and better therapies will be needed.

METHODS

We evaluated a number of patient-derived LGSC cell lines, previously classified according to their MEKi sensitivity. Two cell lines were genomically compared against their matching tumors samples. MEKi-sensitive and MEKi-resistant lines were compared using whole exome sequencing and reverse phase protein array. Two treatment combinations targeting MEKi resistance markers were also evaluated using cell proliferation, cell viability, cell signaling, and drug synergism assays.

RESULTS

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines recapitulated the genomic aberrations from their matching tumor samples. We identified three potential predictive biomarkers that distinguish MEKi sensitive and resistant lines: KRAS mutation status, and EGFR and PKC-alpha protein expression. The biomarkers were validated in three newly developed LGSC cell lines. Sub-lethal combination of MEK and EGFR inhibition showed drug synergy and caused complete cell death in two of four MEKi-resistant cell lines tested.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS mutations and the protein expression of EGFR and PKC-alpha should be evaluated as predictive biomarkers in patients with LGSC treated with MEKi. Combination therapy using a MEKi with EGFR inhibition may represent a promising new therapy for patients with MEKi-resistant LGSC.

Markers of MEK inhibitor resistance in low-grade serous ovarian cancer: EGFR is a potential therapeutic target

Background

Although low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) is rare, case-fatality rates are high as most patients present with advanced disease and current cytotoxic therapies are not overly effective. Recognizing that these cancers may be driven by MAPK pathway activation, MEK inhibitors (MEKi) are being tested in clinical trials. LGSC respond to MEKi only in a subgroup of patients, so predictive biomarkers and better therapies will be needed.

Methods

We evaluated a number of patient-derived LGSC cell lines, previously classified according to their MEKi sensitivity. Two cell lines were genomically compared against their matching tumors samples. MEKi-sensitive and MEKi-resistant lines were compared using whole exome sequencing and reverse phase protein array. Two treatment combinations targeting MEKi resistance markers were also evaluated using cell proliferation, cell viability, cell signaling, and drug synergism assays.

Results

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines recapitulated the genomic aberrations from their matching tumor samples. We identified three potential predictive biomarkers that distinguish MEKi sensitive and resistant lines: KRAS mutation status, and EGFR and PKC-alpha protein expression. The biomarkers were validated in three newly developed LGSC cell lines. Sub-lethal combination of MEK and EGFR inhibition showed drug synergy and caused complete cell death in two of four MEKi-resistant cell lines tested.

Conclusions

KRAS mutations and the protein expression of EGFR and PKC-alpha should be evaluated as predictive biomarkers in patients with LGSC treated with MEKi. Combination therapy using a MEKi with EGFR inhibition may represent a promising new therapy for patients with MEKi-resistant LGSC.

Markers of MEK inhibitor resistance in low-grade serous ovarian cancer: EGFR is a potential therapeutic target

Background

Although low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) is rare, case-fatality rates are high as most patients present with advanced disease and current cytotoxic therapies are not overly effective. Recognizing that these cancers may be driven by MAPK pathway activation, MEK inhibitors (MEKi) are being tested in clinical trials. LGSC respond to MEKi only in a subgroup of patients, so predictive biomarkers and better therapies will be needed.

Methods

We evaluated a number of patient-derived LGSC cell lines, previously classified according to their MEKi sensitivity. Two cell lines were genomically compared against their matching tumors samples. MEKi-sensitive and MEKi-resistant lines were compared using whole exome sequencing and reverse phase protein array. Two treatment combinations targeting MEKi resistance markers were also evaluated using cell proliferation, cell viability, cell signaling, and drug synergism assays.

Results

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines recapitulated the genomic aberrations from their matching tumor samples. We identified three potential predictive biomarkers that distinguish MEKi sensitive and resistant lines: KRAS mutation status, and EGFR and PKC-alpha protein expression. The biomarkers were validated in three newly developed LGSC cell lines. Sub-lethal combination of MEK and EGFR inhibition showed drug synergy and caused complete cell death in two of four MEKi-resistant cell lines tested.

Conclusions

KRAS mutations and the protein expression of EGFR and PKC-alpha should be evaluated as predictive biomarkers in patients with LGSC treated with MEKi. Combination therapy using a MEKi with EGFR inhibition may represent a promising new therapy for patients with MEKi-resistant LGSC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12935-019-0725-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The oncogene KRAS promotes cancer cell dissemination by stabilizing spheroid formation via the MEK pathway

Background

Peritoneal dissemination is a critical prognostic factor in ovarian cancer. Although stabilized spheroid formation promotes cancer cell peritoneal dissemination in ovarian cancer, the associated oncogenes are unknown. In this study, we assessed the role of the KRAS oncogene in ovarian cancer cell dissemination, focusing on the stability of cells in spheroid condition, as well as the modulation of intracellular signaling following spheroid transformation.

Methods

We used ID8, a murine ovarian cancer cell line, and ID8-KRAS, an oncogenic KRAS (G12 V)-transduced ID8 cell line in this study. Spheroid-forming (3D) culture and cell proliferation assays were performed to evaluate the growth characteristics of these cells. cDNA microarray analysis was performed to identify genes involved in KRAS-associated signal transduction in floating condition. A MEK inhibitor was used to evaluate the effect on cancer peritoneal dissemination.

Results

Cell viability and proliferation in monolayer (2D) cultures did not differ between ID8 and ID8-KRAS cells. However, the proportions of viable and proliferating ID8-KRAS cells in 3D culture were approximately 2-fold and 5-fold higher than that of ID8, respectively. Spheroid-formation was increased in ID8-KRAS cells. Analysis of peritoneal floating cells obtained from mice intra-peritoneally injected with cancer cells revealed that the proportion of proliferating cancer cells was approximately 2-fold higher with ID8-KRAS than with ID8 cells. Comprehensive cDNA microarray analysis revealed that pathways related to cell proliferation, and cell cycle checkpoint and regulation were upregulated specifically in ID8-KRAS cells in 3D culture, and that some genes partially regulated by the MEK-ERK pathway were upregulated only in ID8-KRAS cells in 3D culture. Furthermore, a MEK inhibitor, trametinib, suppressed spheroid formation in 3D culture of ID8-KRAS cells, although trametinib did not affect 2D-culture cell proliferation. Finally, we demonstrated that trametinib dramatically improved the prognosis for mice with ID8-KRAS tumors in an in vivo mouse model.

Conclusions

Our data indicated that KRAS promoted ovarian cancer dissemination by stabilizing spheroid formation and that the MEK pathway is important for stabilized spheroid formation. Disruption of spheroid formation by a MEK inhibitor could be a therapeutic target for cancer peritoneal dissemination.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4922-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Triptolide as a novel agent in pancreatic cancer: the validation using patient derived pancreatic tumor cell line

Background

Triptolide induces apoptosis and DNA damage followed by inhibition of DNA repair associated gene expression. However, there is the limited data for biomarker to predict the benefit to triptolide in various cancers including pancreatic cancer.

Methods

We investigated the anti tumor efficacy of triptolide in various pancreatic cancer cell lines (Capan-1, Capan-2, SNU-213, SNU-410, HPAFII, and Hs766T) and patient derived cells (PDCs) from metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.

Results

In vitro cell viability assay for triptolide in 6 PC cell lines, the IC₅₀ was 0.01 uM, 0.02 uM, 0.0096 uM for triptolide in Capan-1, Capan-2 and SNU-213. However, the growth of tumor cells was not significantly reduced by triptolide in Hs766T, SNU-410 and HPAFII. The distinct difference of gene expression was also observed between Capan-1, Capan-2 and SNU-213 and Hs766T, SNU-410 and HPAFII. In analysis of pathway using gene expression profiles, the integrin mediated RAS signaling pathway was associated with the sensitivity of the triptolide in PC cell lines. Immunoblot assay showed that Chk2 phosphorylation after triptolide was distinctively observed in SNU-213 sensitive to triptolide but, not in SNU-410 insensitive to triptolide. This finding in immunoblot assay was also reproduced in PDCs originated from pancreatic cancer patients.

Conclusions

Our findings might be helpful to completely capture the subset of patients who may benefit to tripolide (minnelide). More robust biomarkers such as KRAS mutation and Chk2 phosphorylation and careful clinical trial design using triptolide (minnelide) are warranted.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4995-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Missing information in statewide and national cancer databases: Correlation with health risk factors, geographic disparities, and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to analyze factors associated with outcomes and missing data in women with epithelial ovarian cancer using institutional, state and national databases.

METHODS

Data were abstracted from the University of Virginia cancer registry, Virginia Department of Health (VDH) database, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and analyzed for correlations with demographics, cancer characteristics, and outcomes. Statewide spatial associations between health risk factors such as smoking, obesity, and missing grade/stage were evaluated using bivariate LiSA in Geoda.

RESULTS

There were 524 institutional, 3544 VDH, and 44,464 SEER cases of epithelial ovarian cancer. Institutional cases were younger, most often of white race, had increased grade 1, and decreased unknown grade and stage (all p < 0.001). Significant predictors of unknown grade were non-white race, older age, no surgery, unknown stage/stage IV, and unknown histology/adenocarcinoma. Unknown grade correlated with a significant survival disadvantage. Missing stage and grade correlated with county-level obesity and smoking, as rural regions in Southwest and Southside Virginia had high rates of health risk factors and missing stage/grade compared to urban, affluent regions in Northern Virginia.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a third of nationally reported cases have an unknown grade and 10-20% have an unknown stage which correlates with the worst survival. Predictors of unknown grade include insurance, age, race, smoking status, obesity, and rural setting. Missing data may represent geographical differences or disparities in cancer care available as significantly fewer cases had an unknown grade/stage at a tertiary academic medical center compared to VDH and SEER.