1
|
Gillan C, Magliozzi A, Savelli L, Cornacchione P. Early engagement: The value of MRIT student externs in supporting recruitment, retention, and the future of the medical imaging professions. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2024:S1939-8654(24)00028-6. [PMID: 38461058 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
The healthcare system faces critical challenges in recruitment and retention due to increased patient volumes, post-pandemic recovery needs, and a departing experienced workforce. The concept of an 'extern' role, increasingly explored in professions such as nursing, allows healthcare students to take on paid employment in assistive roles in settings relevant to their future profession. The cornerstone of such an initiative is to bridge academic learning with practical clinical support, engaging the future of the workforce in a safe and meaningful way. METHODS An extern program was piloted at a major urban multi-site medical imaging department beginning in 2022. Over three cohort years, it has explored two types of extern roles (junior and clinical) across three entry-to-practice MRIT disciplines - radiological technology, nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, and ultrasound. In developing roles, compliance with legislative regulations, considerations in defining roles and eligibility criteria, and aligning work commitment with student learning schedules were paramount in informing the program's structure and success. Seventy-three candidates applied to related roles and 34 externs were hired. BENEFITS/CHALLENGES Benefits to the program include engagement in clinical and administrative tasks, facilitation of departmental efficiency, and support for the existing workforce. Specific tasks for clinical externs included supporting staff in patient transfers and positioning, cleaning and restocking rooms, triaging patients and demands, calling inpatients and coordinating porters, and monitoring patients and schedules. For junior externs, tasks involved record-keeping, curating teaching cases, and supporting billing code reviews and quality control exercises like lead apron testing. IMPACTS/OUTCOMES The program's value in shaping the future of healthcare professions has been recognized, particularly in enhancing student transition into practice and increasing recruitment opportunities for the host site. Staff overtime hours were reduced, and new graduates who had worked as externs were more quickly able to work autonomously following hire. The program was mutually beneficial to existing staff and future professionals, reinforcing the workforce without sacrificing the higher level learning achieved through university-based preparation for practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gillan
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada.
| | - A Magliozzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada; Michener Institute of Education at UHN, Toronto Canada
| | - L Savelli
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto Canada
| | - P Cornacchione
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Spanò Bascio L, Alboni C, Chiarello G, Savelli L, Bogani G, Martinelli F, Chiappa V, Ditto A, Raspagliesi F. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: When, how and in which patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:107956. [PMID: 38286085 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
The role of nodal dissection in patients with endometrial cancer has been intensively studied in several studies. Historically, systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy represented the gold standard surgical treatment to assess potential nodal involvement and consequently define the appropriate stage of the tumor. Over the last years, sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced as a more targeted alternative to lymph node dissection for lymph node staging and it has become popular among gynecologic oncologists. However, no level A evidence is still available, and several features of the SLNB technique have been matter of discussion among clinicians and a universally accepted methodology is still not currently available. This narrative review aims to summarize the body of knowledge on SLNB to offer the reader a complete picture about the evolution of this technique over the last decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ludovica Spanò Bascio
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Carlo Alboni
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giulia Chiarello
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Italy
| | - Luca Savelli
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Ditto
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barcroft JF, Linton-Reid K, Landolfo C, Al-Memar M, Parker N, Kyriacou C, Munaretto M, Fantauzzi M, Cooper N, Yazbek J, Bharwani N, Lee SR, Kim JH, Timmerman D, Posma J, Savelli L, Saso S, Aboagye EO, Bourne T. Machine learning and radiomics for segmentation and classification of adnexal masses on ultrasound. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:41. [PMID: 38378773 PMCID: PMC10879532 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00527-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Ultrasound-based models exist to support the classification of adnexal masses but are subjective and rely upon ultrasound expertise. We aimed to develop an end-to-end machine learning (ML) model capable of automating the classification of adnexal masses. In this retrospective study, transvaginal ultrasound scan images with linked diagnoses (ultrasound subjective assessment or histology) were extracted and segmented from Imperial College Healthcare, UK (ICH development dataset; n = 577 masses; 1444 images) and Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Italy (MPH external dataset; n = 184 masses; 476 images). A segmentation and classification model was developed using convolutional neural networks and traditional radiomics features. Dice surface coefficient (DICE) was used to measure segmentation performance and area under the ROC curve (AUC), F1-score and recall for classification performance. The ICH and MPH datasets had a median age of 45 (IQR 35-60) and 48 (IQR 38-57) years old and consisted of 23.1% and 31.5% malignant cases, respectively. The best segmentation model achieved a DICE score of 0.85 ± 0.01, 0.88 ± 0.01 and 0.85 ± 0.01 in the ICH training, ICH validation and MPH test sets. The best classification model achieved a recall of 1.00 and F1-score of 0.88 (AUC:0.93), 0.94 (AUC:0.89) and 0.83 (AUC:0.90) in the ICH training, ICH validation and MPH test sets, respectively. We have developed an end-to-end radiomics-based model capable of adnexal mass segmentation and classification, with a comparable predictive performance (AUC 0.90) to the published performance of expert subjective assessment (gold standard), and current risk models. Further prospective evaluation of the classification performance of this ML model against existing methods is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer F Barcroft
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Maya Al-Memar
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nina Parker
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Kyriacou
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Munaretto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, Forli, Italy
| | - Martina Fantauzzi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Nina Cooper
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph Yazbek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nishat Bharwani
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sa Ra Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ju Hee Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joram Posma
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Luca Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, Forli, Italy
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Eric O Aboagye
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Chiappa V, Ceccaroni M, Roviglione G, Savelli L, Ferrero S, Raspagliesi F, Spanò Bascio L. Epidemiology of infertility in women with endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2024; 92:102454. [PMID: 38183767 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a benign, chronic, inflammatory condition affecting up to 10 % of women and characterised by the presence of glands and stroma tissue outside the uterus. Epidemiological and clinical studies demonstrate a consistent association between endometriosis and infertility. However, this relationship is far to be clearly understood and several mechanisms are involved. Available data show that patients with endometriosis have an increased estimated risk of infertility between two and four times compared with the general population. On the other hand, the probability of patients with infertility to have endometriosis is reported up to about 50 % of the cases. Future studies should aim to better elucidate the mechanisms behind endometriosis-associated infertility in order to offer the more appropriate and tailored management for the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria" Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Roviglione
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria" Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Savelli
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Landolfo C, Bourne T, Froyman W, Van Calster B, Ceusters J, Testa AC, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Van Holsbeke C, Domali E, Fruscio R, Epstein E, Franchi D, Kudla MJ, Chiappa V, Alcazar JL, Leone FPG, Buonomo F, Coccia ME, Guerriero S, Deo N, Jokubkiene L, Savelli L, Fischerova D, Czekierdowski A, Kaijser J, Coosemans A, Scambia G, Vergote I, Timmerman D, Valentin L. Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two-step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 61:231-242. [PMID: 36178788 PMCID: PMC10107772 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous work has suggested that the ultrasound-based benign simple descriptors (BDs) can reliably exclude malignancy in a large proportion of women presenting with an adnexal mass. This study aimed to validate a modified version of the BDs and to validate a two-step strategy to estimate the risk of malignancy, in which the modified BDs are followed by the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model if modified BDs do not apply. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis using data from the 2-year interim analysis of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Phase-5 study, in which consecutive patients with at least one adnexal mass were recruited irrespective of subsequent management (conservative or surgery). The main outcome was classification of tumors as benign or malignant, based on histology or on clinical and ultrasound information during 1 year of follow-up. Multiple imputation was used when outcome based on follow-up was uncertain according to predefined criteria. RESULTS A total of 8519 patients were recruited at 36 centers between 2012 and 2015. We excluded patients who were already in follow-up at recruitment and all patients from 19 centers that did not fulfil our criteria for good-quality surgical and follow-up data, leaving 4905 patients across 17 centers for statistical analysis. Overall, 3441 (70%) tumors were benign, 978 (20%) malignant and 486 (10%) uncertain. The modified BDs were applicable in 1798/4905 (37%) tumors, of which 1786 (99.3%) were benign. The two-step strategy based on ADNEX without CA125 had an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). The risk of malignancy was slightly underestimated, but calibration varied between centers. A sensitivity analysis in which we expanded the definition of uncertain outcome resulted in 1419 (29%) tumors with uncertain outcome and an AUC of the two-step strategy without CA125 of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95). CONCLUSION A large proportion of adnexal masses can be classified as benign by the modified BDs. For the remaining masses, the ADNEX model can be used to estimate the risk of malignancy. This two-step strategy is convenient for clinical use. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Landolfo
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
| | - T. Bourne
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - W. Froyman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - B. Van Calster
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Biomedical Data SciencesLeiden University Medical Centre (LUMC)LeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J. Ceusters
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - A. C. Testa
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - L. Wynants
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of EpidemiologyCAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - P. Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - C. Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyZiekenhuis Oost‐LimburgGenkBelgium
| | - E. Domali
- First Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAlexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
| | - R. Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Milano‐Bicocca, San Gerardo HospitalMonzaItaly
| | - E. Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and EducationKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySödersjukhusetStockholmSweden
| | - D. Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of GynecologyEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - M. J. Kudla
- Department of Perinatology and Oncological GynecologyFaculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of SilesiaKatowicePoland
| | - V. Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyNational Cancer Institute of MilanMilanItaly
| | - J. L. Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyClinica Universidad de Navarra, School of MedicinePamplonaSpain
| | - F. P. G. Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBiomedical and Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of MilanMilanItaly
| | - F. Buonomo
- Institute for Maternal and Child HealthIRCCS ‘Burlo Garofolo’TriesteItaly
| | - M. E. Coccia
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - S. Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio CasulaCagliariItaly
| | - N. Deo
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWhipps Cross HospitalLondonUK
| | - L. Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - L. Savelli
- Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction UnitSant'Orsola‐Malpighi Hospital of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - D. Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University and General University Hospital in PraguePragueCzech Republic
| | - A. Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynecological Oncology and GynecologyMedical University of LublinLublinPoland
| | - J. Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIkazia HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - G. Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - I. Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - D. Timmerman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - L. Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Di Lorenzo P, Conteduca V, Scarpi E, Adorni M, Multinu F, Garbi A, Betella I, Grassi T, Bianchi T, Di Martino G, Amadori A, Maniglio P, Strada I, Carinelli S, Jaconi M, Aletti G, Zanagnolo V, Maggioni A, Savelli L, De Giorgi U, Landoni F, Colombo N, Fruscio R. Advanced low grade serous ovarian cancer: A retrospective analysis of surgical and chemotherapeutic management in two high volume oncological centers. Front Oncol 2022; 12:970918. [PMID: 36237308 PMCID: PMC9551309 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.970918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple summaryLow-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) represents an uncommon histotype of serous ovarian cancer (accounting for approximately 5% of all ovarian cancer) with a distinct behavior compared to its high-grade serous counterpart, characterized by a better prognosis and low response rate to chemotherapeutic agents. Similar to high-grade serous ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery is considered crucial for patient survival. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the outcomes of women affected by advanced stages (III–IV FIGO) of LGSOC from two high-volume oncological centers for ovarian neoplasm. In particular, we sought to evaluate the impact on survival outcomes of optimal cytoreductive surgery [i.e., residual disease (RD) <10 mm at the end of surgery]. The results of our work confirm the role of complete cytoreduction (i.e., no evidence of disease after surgery) in the survival of patients and even the positive prognostic role of a minimal RD (i.e., <10 mm), whenever complete cytoreduction cannot be achieved.BackgroundLow-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare entity with different behavior compared to high-grade serous (HGSOC). Because of its general low chemosensitivity, complete cytoreductive surgery with no residual disease is crucial in advanced stage LGSOC. We evaluated the impact of optimal cytoreduction on survival outcome both at first diagnosis and at recurrence.MethodsWe retrospectively studied consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced LGSOCs who underwent cytoreductive surgery in two oncological centers from January 1994 to December 2018. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using the Greenwood formula.ResultsA total of 92 patients were included (median age was 47 years, IQR 35–64). The median overall survival (OS) was 142.3 months in patients with no residual disease (RD), 86.4 months for RD 1–10 mm and 35.2 months for RD >10 mm (p = 0.002). Progression-free survival (PFS) was inversely related to RD after primary cytoreductive surgery (RD = 0 vs RD = 1–10 mm vs RD >10 mm, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, RD 1–10 mm (HR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.30–4.06, p = 0.004), RD >10 mm (HR = 3.89, 95% CI 1.92–7.88, p = 0.0004), FIGO stage IV (p = 0.001), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (p = 0.010) were independent predictors of PFS. RD >10 mm (HR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.52–6.46, p = 0.004), FIGO stage IV (p <0.0001) and NACT (p = 0.030) were significantly associated with a lower OS.ConclusionsOptimal cytoreductive surgery improves survival outcomes in advanced stage LGSOCs. When complete debulking is impossible, a RD <10 mm confers better OS compared to an RD >10 mm in this setting of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Di Lorenzo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- *Correspondence: Paolo Di Lorenzo, ; Ugo De Giorgi,
| | - Vincenza Conteduca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy
| | - Emanuela Scarpi
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Marco Adorni
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Annalisa Garbi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Ilaria Betella
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Tommaso Bianchi
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Di Martino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Amadori
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Paolo Maniglio
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Isabella Strada
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Silvestro Carinelli
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Jaconi
- Department of Pathology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aletti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Vanna Zanagnolo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Angelo Maggioni
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Savelli
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
- *Correspondence: Paolo Di Lorenzo, ; Ugo De Giorgi,
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ciccarone F, Biscione A, Moro F, Fischerova D, Savelli L, Munaretto M, Jokubkiene L, Sladkevicius P, Chiappa V, Fruscio R, Franchi D, Epstein E, Timmerman D, Froyman W, Valentin L, Scambia G, Testa AC. Imaging in gynecological disease (23): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian carcinosarcoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 59:241-247. [PMID: 34225386 DOI: 10.1002/uog.23733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian carcinosarcoma. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study. Patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian carcinosarcoma, who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination between 2010 and 2019, were identified from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database. Additional patients who were examined outside of the IOTA study were identified from the databases of the participating centers. The masses were described using the terms and definitions of the IOTA group. Additionally, two experienced ultrasound examiners reviewed all available images to identify typical ultrasound features using pattern recognition. RESULTS Ninety-one patients with ovarian carcinosarcoma who had undergone ultrasound examination were identified, of whom 24 were examined within the IOTA studies and 67 were examined outside of the IOTA studies. Median age at diagnosis was 66 (range, 33-91) years and 84/91 (92.3%) patients were postmenopausal. Most patients (67/91, 73.6%) were symptomatic, with the most common complaint being pain (51/91, 56.0%). Most tumors (67/91, 73.6%) were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage III or IV. Bilateral lesions were observed on ultrasound in 46/91 (50.5%) patients. Ascites was present in 38/91 (41.8%) patients. The median largest tumor diameter was 100 (range, 18-260) mm. All ovarian carcinosarcomas contained solid components, and most were described as solid (66/91, 72.5%) or multilocular-solid (22/91, 24.2%). The median diameter of the largest solid component was 77.5 (range, 11-238) mm. Moderate or rich vascularization was found in 78/91 (85.7%) cases. Retrospective analysis of ultrasound images and videoclips using pattern recognition in 73 cases revealed that all tumors had irregular margins and inhomogeneous echogenicity of the solid components. Forty-seven of 73 (64.4%) masses appeared as a solid tumor with cystic areas. Cooked appearance of the solid tissue was identified in 28/73 (38.4%) tumors. No pathognomonic ultrasound sign of ovarian carcinosarcoma was found. CONCLUSIONS Ovarian carcinosarcomas are usually diagnosed in postmenopausal women and at an advanced stage. The most common ultrasound appearance is a large solid tumor with irregular margins, inhomogeneous echogenicity of the solid tissue and cystic areas. The second most common pattern is a large multilocular-solid mass with inhomogeneous echogenicity of the solid tissue. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ciccarone
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Biscione
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Savelli
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Unit, Women's and Children's Department, Forlì Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - M Munaretto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - L Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - V Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - D Franchi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Division of Gynecology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - G Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - A C Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fontana E, Savelli L, Alletto A, Seracchioli R. Uterine PEComa initially misdiagnosed as a leiomyoma: Sonographic findings and review of the literature. J Clin Ultrasound 2021; 49:492-497. [PMID: 33197067 DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal tumors with malignant potential that arise from gynecological organs in up to 25% of cases. The lack of data regarding the preoperative US features of uterine PEComas is reflected by the frequent misdiagnosis with leiomyomas. We describe the sonographic appearance of a richly vascularized cervical PEComa mimicking a myoma and report the analysis of six additional cases in the literature with a description of their ultrasound features. Most cases involved a single lesion arising from the uterine cervix with a rapid growth pattern, regular margins, heterogeneous echogenicity, absence of shadowing, and moderate-to-rich vascularity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Fontana
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Savelli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Alletto
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Savelli L, Ambrosio M, Salucci P, Raimondo D, Arena A, Seracchioli R. Transvaginal ultrasound features of normal uterosacral ligaments. Fertil Steril 2021; 116:275-277. [PMID: 33583595 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To show a step-by-step technique to assess normal uterosacral ligaments (USLs) during transvaginal ultrasound. Uterosacral ligaments represent the most common location of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) in the posterior compartment and their involvement significantly increases the risk of ureteral lesions. The ultrasonographic diagnosis of DIE involving USLs is characterized by a wide range of accuracies described between studies, probably due to variations in the examination technique, quality of ultrasound equipment, and experience of the operators. Although described as a new classification system of DIE involving USLs, the technique for visualizing normal USLs has not yet been described. DESIGN Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. SETTING Academic tertiary hospital. PATIENT(S) The video shows a 33-year-old nulliparous woman scheduled for laparoscopic removal of a para-ovarian cyst of approximately 6 cm. Procedural steps were repeated and confirmed in another four patients submitted to laparoscopy for benign diseases (Table 1). Moreover, we here show the case of a 29-year-old woman with an isolated DIE nodule of the right USL with a comparison of laparoscopic and ultrasound findings. To better point out the technique applied in a clinical setting we show also cases of infiltrated USLs (Table 2) during the ultrasound scan in women scheduled for endometriosis surgery. Informed consent was obtained from all of the patients. The study protocol was approved by the local institutional Ethics Committee (580/2018/Oss/AOUBo). INTERVENTION(S) To understand correctly the right position of USLs we performed an ultrasound during a surgical procedure; in this way it was possible to recognize the area of interest while the surgeon filled the pouch of Douglas with fluid and highlighted the anatomical area with pliers. Uterosacral ligaments can be seen in the mid-sagittal and transverse view of the uterus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Description of appearance of normal USLs during transvaginal ultrasound. RESULT(S) Uterosacral ligaments, at transvaginal ultrasound, appear as hyperechoic stripes starting from the cervix and pointing laterally in a semi-horizontal direction. CONCLUSION(S) We provided a step-by-step technique (Table 3) that may be a useful tool to see accurately both the USLs at transvaginal ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Savelli
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Ambrosio
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Paolo Salucci
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Arena
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sladkevicius P, Jokubkiene L, Timmerman D, Fischerova D, Van Holsbeke C, Franchi D, Savelli L, Epstein E, Fruscio R, Kaijser J, Czekierdowski A, Guerriero S, Pascual MA, Testa AC, Ameye L, Valentin L. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57:324-334. [PMID: 32853459 PMCID: PMC7898332 DOI: 10.1002/uog.22191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess whether vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler ultrasound improves discrimination between benignity and malignancy if used as a second-stage test in adnexal masses that are difficult to classify. METHODS This was a prospective observational international multicenter diagnostic accuracy study. Consecutive patients with an adnexal mass underwent standardized transvaginal two-dimensional (2D) grayscale and color or power Doppler and 3D power Doppler ultrasound examination by an experienced examiner, and those with a 'difficult' tumor were included in the current analysis. A difficult tumor was defined as one in which the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) logistic regression model-1 (LR-1) yielded an ambiguous result (risk of malignancy, 8.3% to 25.5%), or as one in which the ultrasound examiner was uncertain regarding classification as benign or malignant when using subjective assessment. Even when the ultrasound examiner was uncertain, he/she was obliged to classify the tumor as most probably benign or most probably malignant. For each difficult tumor, one researcher created a 360° rotating 3D power Doppler image of the vessel tree in the whole tumor and another of the vessel tree in a 5-cm3 spherical volume selected from the most vascularized part of the tumor. Two other researchers, blinded to the patient's history, 2D ultrasound findings and histological diagnosis, independently described the vessel tree using predetermined vessel features. Their agreed classification was used. The reference standard was the histological diagnosis of the mass. The sensitivity of each test for discriminating between benign and malignant difficult tumors was plotted against 1 - specificity on a receiver-operating-characteristics diagram, and the test with the point furthest from the reference line was considered to have the best diagnostic ability. RESULTS Of 2403 women with an adnexal mass, 376 (16%) had a difficult mass. Ultrasound volumes were available for 138 of these cases. In 79/138 masses, the ultrasound examiner was uncertain about the diagnosis based on subjective assessment, in 87/138, IOTA LR-1 yielded an ambiguous result and, in 28/138, both methods gave an uncertain result. Of the masses, 38/138 (28%) were malignant. Among tumors that were difficult to classify as benign or malignant by subjective assessment, the vessel feature 'densely packed vessels' had the best discriminative ability (sensitivity 67% (18/27), specificity 83% (43/52)) and was slightly superior to subjective assessment (sensitivity 74% (20/27), specificity 60% (31/52)). In tumors in which IOTA LR-1 yielded an ambiguous result, subjective assessment (sensitivity 82% (14/17), specificity 79% (55/70)) was superior to the best vascular feature, i.e. changes in the diameter of vessels in the whole tumor volume (sensitivity 71% (12/17), specificity 69% (48/70)). CONCLUSION Vessel morphology depicted by 3D power Doppler ultrasound may slightly improve discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify by subjective ultrasound assessment. For tumors in which the IOTA LR-1 model yields an ambiguous result, subjective assessment is superior to vessel morphology as a second-stage test. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityMalmöSweden
| | - L. Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityMalmöSweden
| | - D. Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Leuven Cancer InstituteUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - D. Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University and First Faculty of MedicinePragueCzech Republic
| | - C. Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyZiekenhuis Oost LimburgGenkBelgium
| | - D. Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of GynecologyEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
| | - L. Savelli
- Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine Unit, S. Orsola‐Malpighi HospitalUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - E. Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and EducationKarolinska Institute, SödersjukhusetStockholmSweden
| | - R. Fruscio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo HospitalUniversity of Milan‐BicoccaMonzaItaly
| | - J. Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIkazia Hospital RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. Czekierdowski
- 1st Department of Gynecological Oncology and GynecologyMedical University of LublinLublinPoland
| | - S. Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, MonserratoCagliariItaly
| | - M. A. Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and ReproductionHospital Universitari DexeusBarcelonaSpain
| | - A. C. Testa
- Department of Gynecological OncologyCatholic University of the Sacred HeartRomeItaly
| | - L. Ameye
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Jules Bordet InstituteUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - L. Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityMalmöSweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leonardi M, Espada M, Kho RM, Magrina JF, Millischer AE, Savelli L, Condous G. Endometriosis and the Urinary Tract: From Diagnosis to Surgical Treatment. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:E771. [PMID: 33007875 PMCID: PMC7650710 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10100771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
We aim to describe the diagnosis and surgical management of urinary tract endometriosis (UTE). We detail current diagnostic tools, including advanced transvaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical diagnostic tools such as cystourethroscopy. While discussing surgical treatment options, we emphasize the importance of an interdisciplinary team for complex cases that involve the urinary tract. While bladder deep endometriosis (DE) is more straightforward in its surgical treatment, ureteral DE requires a high level of surgical skill. Specialists should be aware of the important entity of UTE, due to the serious health implications for women. When UTE exists, it is important to work within an interdisciplinary radiological and surgical team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Leonardi
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endoscopy Surgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia; (M.E.); (G.C.)
- Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2747, Australia
- Endometriosis Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N3Z5, Canada
| | - Mercedes Espada
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endoscopy Surgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia; (M.E.); (G.C.)
- Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2747, Australia
| | - Rosanne M. Kho
- Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA;
| | - Javier F. Magrina
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| | - Anne-Elodie Millischer
- IMPC Radiology Bachaumont Paris and Radiodiagnostics Department, Hôpital Necker, 75015 Paris, France;
| | - Luca Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - George Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endoscopy Surgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia; (M.E.); (G.C.)
- Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2747, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Anfelter P, Testa A, Chiappa V, Froyman W, Fruscio R, Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Mascillini F, Pascual MA, Sibal M, Savelli L, Zannoni GF, Timmerman D, Epstein E. Imaging in gynecological disease (17): ultrasound features of malignant ovarian yolk sac tumors (endodermal sinus tumors). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56:276-284. [PMID: 32119168 DOI: 10.1002/uog.22002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and sonographic characteristics of malignant ovarian yolk sac tumors (YSTs). METHODS In this retrospective multicenter study, we included 21 patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian YST and available transvaginal ultrasound images and/or videoclips and/or a detailed ultrasound report. Ten patients identified from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies had undergone a standardized preoperative ultrasound examination, by an experienced ultrasound examiner, between 1999 and 2016. A further 11 patients were identified through medical files, for whom ultrasound images were retrieved from local image workstations and picture archiving and communication systems. All tumors were described using IOTA terminology. The collected ultrasound images and videoclips were used by two observers for additional characterization of the tumors. RESULTS All cases were pure YSTs, except for one that was a mixed tumor (80% YST and 20% embryonal carcinoma). Median age at diagnosis was 25 (interquartile range (IQR), 19.5-30.5) years. Seventy-six percent (16/21) of women had an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage I-II tumor at diagnosis. Fifty-eight percent (11/19) of women felt pain during the ultrasound examination and one presented with ovarian torsion. Median serum α-fetoprotein (S-AFP) level was 4755 (IQR, 1071-25 303) µg/L and median serum CA 125 level was 126 (IQR, 35-227) kU/L. On ultrasound assessment, 95% (20/21) of tumors were unilateral. The median maximum tumor diameter was 157 (IQR, 107-181) mm and the largest solid component was 110 (IQR, 66-159) mm. Tumors were classified as either multilocular-solid (10/21; 48%) or solid (11/21; 52%). Papillary projections were found in 10% (2/21) of cases. Most (20/21; 95%) tumors were well vascularized (color score, 3-4) and none had acoustic shadowing. Malignancy was suspected in all cases, except in the patient with ovarian torsion, who presented a tumor with a color score of 1, which was classified as probably benign. Image and videoclip quality was considered as adequate in 18/21 cases. On review of the images and videoclips, we found that all tumors contained both solid components and cystic spaces, and that 89% (16/18) had irregular, still fine-textured and slightly hyperechoic solid tissue, giving them a characteristic appearance. CONCLUSION Malignant ovarian YSTs are often detected at an early stage, in young women usually in the second or third decade of life, presenting with pain and markedly elevated S-AFP. On ultrasound, malignant ovarian YSTs are mostly unilateral, large and multilocular-solid or solid, with fine-textured slightly hyperechoic solid tissue and rich vascularization. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Anfelter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Testa
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - V Chiappa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - F Mascillini
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproduction, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Sibal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - L Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - G F Zannoni
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Van Calster B, Valentin L, Froyman W, Landolfo C, Ceusters J, Testa AC, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Van Holsbeke C, Domali E, Fruscio R, Epstein E, Franchi D, Kudla MJ, Chiappa V, Alcazar JL, Leone FPG, Buonomo F, Coccia ME, Guerriero S, Deo N, Jokubkiene L, Savelli L, Fischerová D, Czekierdowski A, Kaijser J, Coosemans A, Scambia G, Vergote I, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study. BMJ 2020; 370:m2614. [PMID: 32732303 PMCID: PMC7391073 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the performance of diagnostic prediction models for ovarian malignancy in all patients with an ovarian mass managed surgically or conservatively. DESIGN Multicentre cohort study. SETTING 36 oncology referral centres (tertiary centres with a specific gynaecological oncology unit) or other types of centre. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive adult patients presenting with an adnexal mass between January 2012 and March 2015 and managed by surgery or follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Overall and centre specific discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of six prediction models for ovarian malignancy (risk of malignancy index (RMI), logistic regression model 2 (LR2), simple rules, simple rules risk model (SRRisk), assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa (ADNEX) with or without CA125). ADNEX allows the risk of malignancy to be subdivided into risks of a borderline, stage I primary, stage II-IV primary, or secondary metastatic malignancy. The outcome was based on histology if patients underwent surgery, or on results of clinical and ultrasound follow-up at 12 (±2) months. Multiple imputation was used when outcome based on follow-up was uncertain. RESULTS The primary analysis included 17 centres that met strict quality criteria for surgical and follow-up data (5717 of all 8519 patients). 812 patients (14%) had a mass that was already in follow-up at study recruitment, therefore 4905 patients were included in the statistical analysis. The outcome was benign in 3441 (70%) patients and malignant in 978 (20%). Uncertain outcomes (486, 10%) were most often explained by limited follow-up information. The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest for ADNEX with CA125 (0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 0.96), ADNEX without CA125 (0.94, 0.91 to 0.95) and SRRisk (0.94, 0.91 to 0.95), and lowest for RMI (0.89, 0.85 to 0.92). Calibration varied among centres for all models, however the ADNEX models and SRRisk were the best calibrated. Calibration of the estimated risks for the tumour subtypes was good for ADNEX irrespective of whether or not CA125 was included as a predictor. Overall clinical utility (net benefit) was highest for the ADNEX models and SRRisk, and lowest for RMI. For patients who received at least one follow-up scan (n=1958), overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.84) for RMI to 0.89 (0.81 to 0.94) for ADNEX with CA125. CONCLUSIONS Our study found the ADNEX models and SRRisk are the best models to distinguish between benign and malignant masses in all patients presenting with an adnexal mass, including those managed conservatively. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01698632.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- EPI-Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lil Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wouter Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonia C Testa
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Life Science and Public Health, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Laure Wynants
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Povilas Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Ekaterini Domali
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Elisabeth Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dorella Franchi
- Preventive Gynaecology Unit, Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marek J Kudla
- Department of Perinatology and Oncological Gynaecology, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Juan L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Francesco P G Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Buonomo
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Maria Elisabetta Coccia
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Nandita Deo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Whipps Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ligita Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Luca Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniela Fischerová
- Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Artur Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Jeroen Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Life Science and Public Health, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium dirk.timmerman@uzleuven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ambrosio M, Raimondo D, Savelli L, Salucci P, Arena A, Borghese G, Mattioli G, Giaquinto I, Scifo MC, Meriggiola MC, Casadio P, Seracchioli R. Transvaginal Ultrasound and Doppler Features of Intraligamental Myomas. J Ultrasound Med 2020; 39:1253-1259. [PMID: 31944342 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the ultrasound (US) features of intraligamental myomas (IMs) using Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group standardized terminology. METHODS This was a retrospective monocentric study. A total of 125 consecutive women with a preoperative US diagnosis of a myoma located close to the uterine isthmus (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages 5, 6, and 7) from 2016 to 2019 who underwent laparoscopic or laparotomic myomectomy or hysterectomy were included for study analyses. The US data were retrieved from US reports and stored digital images by 2 authors. Ultrasound features of myomas were described according to Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment terminology. Clinical data for the study population were retrieved from the patients' records. RESULTS Nineteen women with a surgical confirmation of an IM were included in the study group; the remaining population constituted the control group (n = 106). Non-uniform echogenicity was detected in 17 of 19 (89%) of IMs compared to 26 of 106 (25%) fibroids in the control group (P < .001). The presence of shadowing was detected in 12 of 19 (63%) IMs compared to 94 of 106 (89%) cases in the control group (P = .004). Intraligamental myomas were more vascularized tumors compared to myomas in the control group (P = .004). Transvaginal US showed high specificity for the diagnosis of an IM (0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.96). CONCLUSIONS On US imaging, IMs appear as vascularized solid tumors with nonuniform echogenicity; cones of shadows were less frequent in IMs than the control group, and this finding can help in the differential diagnosis. Knowledge of their specific US features could help sonographers make an accurate diagnosis, allowing them to plan correct surgery and avoid severe complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Ambrosio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Salucci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Arena
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Borghese
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Mattioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ilaria Giaquinto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Scifo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Meriggiola
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stepniewska AK, Verrazzo P, Savelli L, Trivella G, Signori C, Clarizia R, Guerriero M, Mollo A, De Placido G, Ceccaroni M. Comparison of Virtual Ultrasonographic Hysteroscopy with Conventional Hysteroscopy in the Workup of Patients Who Are Infertile. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:63-74. [PMID: 32197993 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare the tolerability and diagnostic accuracy of virtual ultrasonographic hysteroscopy (VUH) with that of conventional diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy in the workup of patients who are infertile. DESIGN A single-center, retrospective cohort study. SETTING Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery Unit of Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria in Negrar, Italy. PATIENTS A total of 120 consecutive women who underwent hysterosalpingosonography and subsequent VUH and conventional hysteroscopy for infertility evaluation were included. The inclusion criterion was infertility for at least 1 year, with evaluation in the early or intermediate follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. INTERVENTIONS After the placement of an intracervical catheter, a Ringer Lactate solution was injected into the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and a 3D volume was obtained. The ultrasound volume acquired was successively elaborated offline, and a VUH was performed. Subsequently, a variable amount of air was introduced into the uterine cavity, and the patency of the salpinges was evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The VUH findings were compared with those of conventional hysteroscopy performed in the subsequent month. For the detection of endometrial pathology in the overall pool, the sensitivity and specificity of VUH in comparison with conventional hysteroscopy were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.6%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.3%-100%), respectively. For the detection of uterine cavity pathology and uterine malformations in the overall pool, the sensitivities of VUH were 80% (95% CI, 28.4%-99.5%) and 100% (95% CI, 75.3%-100%), respectively, with specificities of 100% (95% CI, 96.8%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.6%-100%), respectively, when compared with conventional hysteroscopy. The positive predictive values for endometrial pathology, uterine cavity alterations, and uterine malformations were 100% (95% CI, 84.6%-100%), 100% (95% CI, 39.8%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 75.3%-100%), respectively, with a receiver operating characteristic area of 100%, 90% (95% CI, 70%-100%), and 100%, respectively. There were no cases of severe vasovagal reactions or other complications. Most patients (67%, 81 of 120 women) described the examination as "less painful than expected," 25% (30 of 120 women) "just as expected," and only 7% (9 of 120 women) as "more painful than expected." CONCLUSION VUH was well tolerated and showed a high accuracy (100%) in the study of the uterine cavity when compared with conventional hysteroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Katarzyna Stepniewska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Stepniewska, Trivella, Signori, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni).
| | - Paolo Verrazzo
- University Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine, and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples (Drs. Verrazzo, Mollo, and De Placido)
| | - Luca Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Savelli) University of Bologna, Bologna
| | - Giamberto Trivella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Stepniewska, Trivella, Signori, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Chiara Signori
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Stepniewska, Trivella, Signori, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Roberto Clarizia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Stepniewska, Trivella, Signori, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Massimo Guerriero
- Department of Computer Science (Dr. Guerriero), University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Clinical Research Unit (Dr. Guerriero), IRCCS Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona
| | - Antonio Mollo
- University Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine, and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples (Drs. Verrazzo, Mollo, and De Placido)
| | - Giuseppe De Placido
- University Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine, and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples (Drs. Verrazzo, Mollo, and De Placido)
| | - Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Stepniewska, Trivella, Signori, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ludovisi M, Moro F, Pasciuto T, Di Noi S, Giunchi S, Savelli L, Pascual MA, Sladkevicius P, Alcazar JL, Franchi D, Mancari R, Moruzzi MC, Jurkovic D, Chiappa V, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Epstein E, Frühauf F, Fischerova D, Fruscio R, Ciccarone F, Zannoni GF, Scambia G, Valentin L, Testa AC. Imaging in gynecological disease (15): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of uterine sarcoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54:676-687. [PMID: 30908820 DOI: 10.1002/uog.20270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of uterine sarcomas. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study. From the databases of 13 ultrasound centers, we identified patients with a histological diagnosis of uterine sarcoma with available ultrasound reports and ultrasound images who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination between 1996 and 2016. As the first step, each author collected information from the original ultrasound reports from his/her own center on predefined ultrasound features of the tumors and by reviewing the ultrasound images to identify information on variables not described in the original report. As the second step, 16 ultrasound examiners reviewed the images electronically in a consensus meeting and described them using predetermined terminology. RESULTS We identified 116 patients with leiomyosarcoma, 48 with endometrial stromal sarcoma and 31 with undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. Median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 26-86 years). Most patients were symptomatic at diagnosis (164/183 (89.6%)), the most frequent presenting symptom being abnormal vaginal bleeding (91/183 (49.7%)). Patients with endometrial stromal sarcoma were younger than those with leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (median age, 46 years vs 57 and 60 years, respectively). According to the assessment by the original ultrasound examiners, the median diameter of the largest tumor was 91 mm (range, 7-321 mm). Visible normal myometrium was reported in 149/195 (76.4%) cases, and 80.0% (156/195) of lesions were solitary. Most sarcomas (155/195 (79.5%)) were solid masses (> 80% solid tissue), and most manifested inhomogeneous echogenicity of the solid tissue (151/195 (77.4%)); one sarcoma was multilocular without solid components. Cystic areas were described in 87/195 (44.6%) tumors and most cyst cavities had irregular walls (67/87 (77.0%)). Internal shadowing was observed in 42/192 (21.9%) sarcomas and fan-shaped shadowing in 4/192 (2.1%). Moderate or rich vascularization was found on color-Doppler examination in 127/187 (67.9%) cases. In 153/195 (78.5%) sarcomas, the original ultrasound examiner suspected malignancy. Though there were some differences, the results of the first and second steps of the analysis were broadly similar. CONCLUSIONS Uterine sarcomas typically appear as solid masses with inhomogeneous echogenicity, sometimes with irregular cystic areas but only very occasionally with fan-shaped shadowing. Most are moderately or very well vascularized. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ludovisi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - T Pasciuto
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - S Di Noi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - S Giunchi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - L Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - D Franchi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Division of Gynecology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Mancari
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Division of Gynecology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M C Moruzzi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - D Jurkovic
- Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - V Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, University of Cagliary, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - C Exacoustos
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Frühauf
- Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D Fischerova
- Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano - Bicocca, Department of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - F Ciccarone
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G F Zannoni
- Institute of Histopathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Institution of Clinical Sciences Malmoe, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - A C Testa
- Instituto di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Moro F, Magoga G, Pasciuto T, Mascilini F, Moruzzi MC, Fischerova D, Savelli L, Giunchi S, Mancari R, Franchi D, Czekierdowski A, Froyman W, Verri D, Epstein E, Chiappa V, Guerriero S, Zannoni GF, Timmerman D, Scambia G, Valentin L, Testa AC. Imaging in gynecological disease (13): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of endometrioid ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52:535-543. [PMID: 29418038 DOI: 10.1002/uog.19026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian pure endometrioid carcinomas. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study of patients with a histological diagnosis of pure endometrioid carcinoma. We identified 161 patients from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination by an experienced ultrasound examiner between 1999 and 2016, and another 78 patients from the databases of the departments of gynecological oncology in the participating centers. All tumors were described using IOTA terminology. In addition, one author reviewed all available ultrasound images and described them using pattern recognition. RESULTS Median age of the 239 patients was 55 years (range, 19-88 years). On ultrasound examination, two (0.8%) endometrioid carcinomas were described as unilocular cysts, three (1.3%) as multilocular cysts, 37 (15.5%) as unilocular-solid cysts, 115 (48.1%) as multilocular-solid cysts and 82 (34.3%) as solid masses. Median largest tumor diameter was 102.5 mm (range, 20-300 mm) and median largest diameter of the largest solid component was 63 mm (range, 9-300 mm). Papillary projections were present in 70 (29.3%) masses. Most cancers (188 (78.7%)) were unilateral. In 49 (20.5%) cases, the cancer was judged by the pathologist to develop from endometriosis. These cancers, compared with those without evidence of tumor developing from endometriosis, more often manifested papillary projections on ultrasound (46.9% (23/49) vs 24.7% (47/190)), were less often bilateral (8.2% (4/49) vs 24.7% (47/190)) and less often associated with ascites (6.1% (3/49) vs 28.4% (54/190)) and fluid in the pouch of Douglas (24.5% (12/49) vs 48.9% (93/190)). Retrospective analysis of available ultrasound images using pattern recognition revealed that many tumors without evidence of tumor developing from endometriosis (36.3% (41/113)) had a large central solid component entrapped within locules, giving the tumor a cockade-like appearance. CONCLUSIONS Endometrioid cancers are usually large, unilateral, multilocular-solid or solid tumors. The ultrasound characteristics of endometrioid carcinomas developing from endometriosis differ from those without evidence of tumor developing from endometriosis, the former being more often unilateral cysts with papillary projections and no ascites. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Moro
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Magoga
- Instituo di Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - T Pasciuto
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Mascilini
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M C Moruzzi
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - D Fischerova
- Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Giunchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Mancari
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - D Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - A Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynecological Oncology and Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Verri
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset and Department of Women's and Children's Health Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - V Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - G F Zannoni
- Institute of Histopathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Scambia
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - L Valentin
- Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - A C Testa
- Instituo di Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Landolfo C, Valentin L, Franchi D, Van Holsbeke C, Fruscio R, Froyman W, Sladkevicius P, Kaijser J, Ameye L, Bourne T, Savelli L, Coosemans A, Testa A, Timmerman D. Differences in ultrasound features of papillations in unilocular-solid adnexal cysts: a retrospective international multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52:269-278. [PMID: 29119698 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify ultrasound features of papillations or of the cyst wall that can discriminate between benign and malignant unilocular-solid cysts with papillations but no other solid components. METHODS From the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database derived from seven ultrasound centers, we identified patients with an adnexal lesion described at ultrasonography as unilocular-solid with papillations but no other solid components. All patients had undergone transvaginal ultrasound between 1999 and 2007 or 2009 and 2012, by an experienced examiner following the IOTA research protocol. Information on four ultrasound features of papillations had been collected prospectively. Information on a further seven ultrasound features was collected retrospectively from electronic or paper ultrasound images of good quality. The histological diagnosis of the surgically removed adnexal lesion was considered the gold standard. RESULTS Of 204 masses included, 131 (64.2%) were benign, 42 (20.6%) were borderline tumors, 30 (14.7%) were primary invasive tumors and one (0.5%) was a metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the following ultrasound features to be associated independently with malignancy: height of the largest papillation, presence of blood flow in papillations, papillation confluence or dissemination, and shadows behind papillations. Shadows decreased the odds of malignancy, while the other features increased them. CONCLUSION We have identified ultrasound features that can help to discriminate between benign and malignant unilocular-solid cysts with papillations but no other solid components. Our results need to be confirmed in prospective studies. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Landolfo
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - D Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - C Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - J Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ikazia Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Ameye
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - L Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Coosemans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Testa
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, Bartels E, Bertolotto M, Calliada F, Clevert DA, Cosgrove D, Deganello A, D'Onofrio M, Drudi FM, Freeman S, Harvey C, Jenssen C, Jung EM, Klauser AS, Lassau N, Meloni MF, Leen E, Nicolau C, Nolsoe C, Piscaglia F, Prada F, Prosch H, Radzina M, Savelli L, Weskott HP, Wijkstra H. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Short Version). Ultraschall Med 2018; 39:154-180. [PMID: 29510440 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The updated version of the EFSUMB guidelines on the application of non-hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) deals with the use of microbubble ultrasound contrast outside the liver in the many established and emerging applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul S Sidhu
- Department of Radiology, King's College London, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Vito Cantisani
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico Umberto I, Univ. Sapienza of Rome, Italy
| | - Christoph F Dietrich
- Med. Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany and Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital Zhengzhou University, China
| | - Odd Helge Gilja
- National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania
| | - Eva Bartels
- Center for Neurological Vascular Diagnostics, München, Germany
| | | | - Fabrizio Calliada
- Department of Radiology, University of Pavia, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, Department of Radiology, University of Munich - Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - David Cosgrove
- Clinical Sciences, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Annamaria Deganello
- Department of Radiology, King's College London, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Mirko D'Onofrio
- Department of Radiology, GB Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Simon Freeman
- Department of Imaging, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Christopher Harvey
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College Health Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Strausberg, Germany
| | | | - Andrea Sabine Klauser
- Universitaetsklinik fuer Radiodiagnostik, Medizinische Universitaet Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Nathalie Lassau
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus. Imaging Department and IR4M. UMR8081. Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | | | - Edward Leen
- Imaging Department, Imperial College London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | | | - Christian Nolsoe
- Ultrasound Section, Division of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of Internal Medicine, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Prada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy and Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health Science Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA, Milan, Italy
| | - Helmut Prosch
- Abteilung für Allgemeine Radiologie und Kinderradiologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Austria
| | - Maija Radzina
- Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital, Diagnostic Radiology Institute, Riga Stradins University, Radiology Research Laboratory, Riga, Latvia
| | - Luca Savelli
- Gynecology and Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Hessel Wijkstra
- Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam and Signal Processing Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, Bartels E, Bertolotto M, Calliada F, Clevert DA, Cosgrove D, Deganello A, D'Onofrio M, Drudi FM, Freeman S, Harvey C, Jenssen C, Jung EM, Klauser AS, Lassau N, Meloni MF, Leen E, Nicolau C, Nolsoe C, Piscaglia F, Prada F, Prosch H, Radzina M, Savelli L, Weskott HP, Wijkstra H. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall Med 2018; 39:e2-e44. [PMID: 29510439 DOI: 10.1055/a-0586-1107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 480] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The updated version of the EFSUMB guidelines on the application of non-hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) deals with the use of microbubble ultrasound contrast outside the liver in the many established and emerging applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul S Sidhu
- Department of Radiology, King's College London, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Vito Cantisani
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico Umberto I, Univ. Sapienza of Rome, Italy
| | - Christoph F Dietrich
- Med. Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany and Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital Zhengzhou University, China
| | - Odd Helge Gilja
- National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania
| | - Eva Bartels
- Center for Neurological Vascular Diagnostics, München, Germany
| | | | - Fabrizio Calliada
- Department of Radiology, University of Pavia, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, Department of Radiology, University of Munich - Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - David Cosgrove
- Clinical Sciences, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Annamaria Deganello
- Department of Radiology, King's College London, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Mirko D'Onofrio
- Department of Radiology, GB Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Simon Freeman
- Department of Imaging, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Christopher Harvey
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College Health Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Strausberg, Germany
| | | | - Andrea Sabine Klauser
- Universitaetsklinik fuer Radiodiagnostik, Medizinische Universitaet Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Nathalie Lassau
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus. Imaging Department and IR4M. UMR8081. Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | | | - Edward Leen
- Imaging Department, Imperial College London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | | | - Christian Nolsoe
- Ultrasound Section, Division of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of Internal Medicine, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Prada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy and Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health Science Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA, Milan, Italy
| | - Helmut Prosch
- Abteilung für Allgemeine Radiologie und Kinderradiologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Austria
| | - Maija Radzina
- Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital, Diagnostic Radiology Institute, Riga Stradins University, Radiology Research Laboratory, Riga, Latvia
| | - Luca Savelli
- Gynecology and Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Hessel Wijkstra
- Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam and Signal Processing Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mascilini F, Savelli L, Scifo MC, Exacoustos C, Timor-Tritsch IE, De Blasis I, Moruzzi MC, Pasciuto T, Scambia G, Valentin L, Testa AC. Ovarian masses with papillary projections diagnosed and removed during pregnancy: ultrasound features and histological diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50:116-123. [PMID: 27484484 DOI: 10.1002/uog.17216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Revised: 05/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To elucidate the ultrasound features that can discriminate between benign and malignant ovarian cysts with papillary projections but no other solid component in pregnant women. METHODS Thirty-four women with an ultrasound diagnosis of an ovarian cyst with papillary projections but no other solid component that had been removed surgically during pregnancy were identified from the databases of four ultrasound units. Some clinical and ultrasound information was collected prospectively. Missing information was obtained retrospectively from ultrasound images, ultrasound reports and patient records. Using prospectively and retrospectively collected data, the ultrasound appearance of the tumors was described using the terms and definitions of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group. The ultrasound characteristics were compared with the histological diagnosis. RESULTS Of the 34 cases included, 19 (56%) lesions were benign (16 decidualized endometriomas, one cystadenofibroma, one simple cyst, one struma ovarii), 12 (35%) were borderline tumors and three (9%) were primary invasive tumors (two immature teratomas, one endometrioid cystadenocarcinoma). The contour of the cyst papillations was smooth in 79% (15/19) of benign tumors vs 27% (4/15) of malignant tumors (P = 0.002). The cystic content showed ground-glass echogenicity in 74% (14/19) of benign tumors vs 13% (2/15) of malignant tumors (P = 0.0006). All ovarian masses with smooth papillations and ground-glass content (n = 12) were decidualized endometriomas. The papillary projections were vascularized and the color score was 3 or 4 in 88% (14/16) of decidualized endometriomas vs 42% (5/12) of borderline tumors (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS In pregnant women, ovarian cysts with ground-glass echogenicity and papillations with a smooth contour on ultrasound are most likely to be decidualized endometriomas. Cysts with anechoic or low-level echogenicity and papillations with an irregular contour suggest borderline malignancy. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Mascilini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - L Savelli
- Gynecology and Early Pregnancy, Ultrasound Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M C Scifo
- Gynecology and Early Pregnancy, Ultrasound Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - C Exacoustos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - I E Timor-Tritsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - I De Blasis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - M C Moruzzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - T Pasciuto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - A C Testa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wynants L, Timmerman D, Verbakel JY, Testa A, Savelli L, Fischerova D, Franchi D, Van Holsbeke C, Epstein E, Froyman W, Guerriero S, Rossi A, Fruscio R, Leone FP, Bourne T, Valentin L, Van Calster B. Clinical Utility of Risk Models to Refer Patients with Adnexal Masses to Specialized Oncology Care: Multicenter External Validation Using Decision Curve Analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:5082-5090. [PMID: 28512173 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-3248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2016] [Revised: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the utility of preoperative diagnostic models for ovarian cancer based on ultrasound and/or biomarkers for referring patients to specialized oncology care. The investigated models were RMI, ROMA, and 3 models from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group [LR2, ADNEX, and the Simple Rules risk score (SRRisk)].Experimental Design: A secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from 2 cross-sectional cohort studies was performed to externally validate diagnostic models. A total of 2,763 patients (2,403 in dataset 1 and 360 in dataset 2) from 18 centers (11 oncology centers and 7 nononcology hospitals) in 6 countries participated. Excised tissue was histologically classified as benign or malignant. The clinical utility of the preoperative diagnostic models was assessed with net benefit (NB) at a range of risk thresholds (5%-50% risk of malignancy) to refer patients to specialized oncology care. We visualized results with decision curves and generated bootstrap confidence intervals.Results: The prevalence of malignancy was 41% in dataset 1 and 40% in dataset 2. For thresholds up to 10% to 15%, RMI and ROMA had a lower NB than referring all patients. SRRisks and ADNEX demonstrated the highest NB. At a threshold of 20%, the NBs of ADNEX, SRrisks, and RMI were 0.348, 0.350, and 0.270, respectively. Results by menopausal status and type of center (oncology vs. nononcology) were similar.Conclusions: All tested IOTA methods, especially ADNEX and SRRisks, are clinically more useful than RMI and ROMA to select patients with adnexal masses for specialized oncology care. Clin Cancer Res; 23(17); 5082-90. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Wynants
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Y Verbakel
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Antonia Testa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Savelli
- Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine Unit, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dorella Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Elisabeth Epstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wouter Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefano Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria- Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alberto Rossi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lil Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T, Valentin L, Leone FPG, Van Schoubroeck D, Exacoustos C, Installé AJF, Martins WP, Abrao MS, Hudelist G, Bazot M, Alcazar JL, Gonçalves MO, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Savelli L, Dunham R, Reid S, Menakaya U, Bourne T, Ferrero S, Leon M, Bignardi T, Holland T, Jurkovic D, Benacerraf B, Osuga Y, Somigliana E, Timmerman D. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48:318-332. [PMID: 27349699 DOI: 10.1002/uog.15955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 405] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Revised: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The IDEA (International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group) statement is a consensus opinion on terms, definitions and measurements that may be used to describe the sonographic features of the different phenotypes of endometriosis. Currently, it is difficult to compare results between published studies because authors use different terms when describing the same structures and anatomical locations. We hope that the terms and definitions suggested herein will be adopted in centers around the world. This would result in consistent use of nomenclature when describing the ultrasound location and extent of endometriosis. We believe that the standardization of terminology will allow meaningful comparisons between future studies in women with an ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and should facilitate multicenter research. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - T van den Bosch
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tienen Regional Hospital, Tienen, Belgium
| | - L Valentin
- Lund University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - F P G Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - D Van Schoubroeck
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tienen Regional Hospital, Tienen, Belgium
| | - C Exacoustos
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy and Ospedale Generale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebene Fratelli, Rome, Italy
| | - A J F Installé
- KU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS, Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Leuven, Belgium and iMinds Medical IT, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W P Martins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - M S Abrao
- Endometriosis Division, Obstetrics and Gynecological Department, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - G Hudelist
- Hospital St John of God Johannes, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Bazot
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M O Gonçalves
- Clinica Medicina da Mulher and RDO Medicina Diagnóstica, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Ajossa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - L Savelli
- Gynecology and Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Unit, S. Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Dunham
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - S Reid
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - U Menakaya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Calvary Public Hospital & JUNIC Specialist Imaging & Women's Center, Canberra, Australia
| | - T Bourne
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - S Ferrero
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS AOU San Martino - IST, Genova, Italy and Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - M Leon
- Ultrasound Unit, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Clinica Indisa, Santiago, Chile
| | - T Bignardi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda, Ospedaliera Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy
| | - T Holland
- Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Jurkovic
- Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - B Benacerraf
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Y Osuga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - E Somigliana
- Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - D Timmerman
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tienen Regional Hospital, Tienen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa A, Savelli L, Fischerova D, Froyman W, Wynants L, Van Holsbeke C, Epstein E, Franchi D, Kaijser J, Czekierdowski A, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Leone FPG, Rossi A, Landolfo C, Vergote I, Bourne T, Valentin L. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214:424-437. [PMID: 26800772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Revised: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate methods to preoperatively characterize adnexal tumors are pivotal for optimal patient management. A recent metaanalysis concluded that the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis algorithms such as the Simple Rules are the best approaches to preoperatively classify adnexal masses as benign or malignant. OBJECTIVE We sought to develop and validate a model to predict the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses using the ultrasound features in the Simple Rules. STUDY DESIGN This was an international cross-sectional cohort study involving 22 oncology centers, referral centers for ultrasonography, and general hospitals. We included consecutive patients with an adnexal tumor who underwent a standardized transvaginal ultrasound examination and were selected for surgery. Data on 5020 patients were recorded in 3 phases from 2002 through 2012. The 5 Simple Rules features indicative of a benign tumor (B-features) and the 5 features indicative of malignancy (M-features) are based on the presence of ascites, tumor morphology, and degree of vascularity at ultrasonography. Gold standard was the histopathologic diagnosis of the adnexal mass (pathologist blinded to ultrasound findings). Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the risk of malignancy based on the 10 ultrasound features and type of center. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and calibration curves. RESULTS Data on 4848 patients were analyzed. The malignancy rate was 43% (1402/3263) in oncology centers and 17% (263/1585) in other centers. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve on validation data was very similar in oncology centers (0.917; 95% confidence interval, 0.901-0.931) and other centers (0.916; 95% confidence interval, 0.873-0.945). Risk estimates showed good calibration. In all, 23% of patients in the validation data set had a very low estimated risk (<1%) and 48% had a high estimated risk (≥30%). For the 1% risk cutoff, sensitivity was 99.7%, specificity 33.7%, LR+ 1.5, LR- 0.010, PPV 44.8%, and NPV 98.9%. For the 30% risk cutoff, sensitivity was 89.0%, specificity 84.7%, LR+ 5.8, LR- 0.13, PPV 75.4%, and NPV 93.9%. CONCLUSION Quantification of the risk of malignancy based on the Simple Rules has good diagnostic performance both in oncology centers and other centers. A simple classification based on these risk estimates may form the basis of a clinical management system. Patients with a high risk may benefit from surgery by a gynecological oncologist, while patients with a lower risk may be managed locally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonia Testa
- Department of Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Wouter Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laure Wynants
- Department of Electrical Engineering-ESAT, Stadius Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; iMinds Medical IT Department, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Elisabeth Epstein
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dorella Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeroen Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Artur Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynecological Oncology and Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Stefano Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Francesco P G Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Rossi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lil Valentin
- Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Savelli L, Fabbri F, Zannoni L, De Meis L, Di Donato N, Mollo F, Seracchioli R. Preoperative ultrasound diagnosis of deep endometriosis: importance of the examiner's expertise and lesion size. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2015; 15:55-60. [PMID: 28191143 PMCID: PMC5025115 DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2012.tb00227.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) of the posterior compartment (rectovaginal septum, uterosacral ligaments, rectosigmoid colon, vagina) when undertaken by physicians of varying experience and to investigate if size of the nodule is relevant in influencing diagnostic accuracy. Methods: 381 patients who were operated on between January 2007 and December 2010 for suspected pelvic endometriosis were prospectively recruited. Clinical, surgical and histopathologic data were collected and a preoperative TVS was carried out. Comparison was made between the diagnostic accuracy of TVS performed by two groups of physicians of different expertise. Results: One hundred and thirty-six patients underwent removal of deep endometriotic lesions of the posterior compartment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and the overall diagnostic accuracy of the expert operators were 77%, 95%, 90%, 87% and 88% respectively. Corresponding values for first-level operators were: 45%, 98%, 92%, 79% and 81%. In patients with positive findings at TVS, the mean diameter of the endometriotic nodule was of 4.7 ± 3.4 cm while, in cases with negative findings, the average diameter was 2.6 ± 1.1 cm (P < 0.05). Conclusions: TVS is accurate in detecting the presence of DIE. Accuracy is dependent on the experience of the physician and the size of the nodule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Savelli
- Acute Gynecology Unit Gynaecology Department S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Federica Fabbri
- Acute Gynecology Unit Gynaecology Department S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Letizia Zannoni
- Acute Gynecology Unit Gynaecology Department S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Lucia De Meis
- Acute Gynecology Unit Gynaecology Department S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Nadine Di Donato
- Minimally Invasive Gynaecological Surgery Unit, Gynaecology Department S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Francesco Mollo
- Acute Gynecology Unit Gynaecology Department S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Minimally Invasive Gynaecological Surgery Unit, Gynaecology Department S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna Bologna Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Eriksson LSE, Lindqvist PG, Flöter Rådestad A, Dueholm M, Fischerova D, Franchi D, Jokubkiene L, Leone FP, Savelli L, Sladkevicius P, Testa AC, Van den Bosch T, Ameye L, Epstein E. Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of myometrial and cervical stromal invasion in women with endometrial cancer: interobserver reproducibility among ultrasound experts and gynecologists. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45:476-482. [PMID: 25092412 DOI: 10.1002/uog.14645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2014] [Revised: 07/19/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess interobserver reproducibility among ultrasound experts and gynecologists in the prediction by transvaginal ultrasound of deep myometrial and cervical stromal invasion in women with endometrial cancer. METHODS Sonographic videoclips of the uterine corpus and cervix of 53 women with endometrial cancer, examined preoperatively by the same ultrasound expert, were integrated into a digitalized survey. Nine ultrasound experts and nine gynecologists evaluated presence or absence of deep myometrial and cervical stromal invasion. Histopathology from hysterectomy specimens was used as the gold standard. RESULTS Compared with gynecologists, ultrasound experts showed higher sensitivity, specificity and agreement with histopathology in the assessment of cervical stromal invasion (42% (95% CI, 31-53%) vs 57% (95% CI, 45-68%), P < 0.01; 83% (95% CI, 78-86%) vs 87% (95% CI, 83-90%), P = 0.02; and kappa, 0.45 (95% CI, 0.40-0.49) vs 0.58 (95% CI, 0.53-0.62), P < 0.001, respectively) but not of deep myometrial invasion (73% (95% CI, 66-79%) vs 73% (95% CI, 66-79%), P = 1.0; 70% (95% CI, 65-75%) vs 69% (95% CI, 63-74%), P = 0.68; and kappa, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.44-0.53) vs 0.52 (95% CI, 0.48-0.57), P = 0.11, respectively). Though interobserver reproducibility (in the context of test proportions 'good' and 'very good', according to kappa) regarding deep myometrial invasion did not differ between the groups (experts, 34% vs gynecologists, 22%, P = 0.13), ultrasound experts assessed cervical stromal invasion with significantly greater interobserver reproducibility than did gynecologists (53% vs 14%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Preoperative ultrasound assessment of deep myometrial and cervical stromal invasion in endometrial cancer is best performed by ultrasound experts, as, compared with gynecologists, they showed a greater degree of agreement with histopathology and greater interobserver reproducibility in the assessment of cervical stromal invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S E Eriksson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Van Calster B, Van Hoorde K, Valentin L, Testa AC, Fischerova D, Van Holsbeke C, Savelli L, Franchi D, Epstein E, Kaijser J, Van Belle V, Czekierdowski A, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Lanzani C, Scala F, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ 2014; 349:g5920. [PMID: 25320247 PMCID: PMC4198550 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 246] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a risk prediction model to preoperatively discriminate between benign, borderline, stage I invasive, stage II-IV invasive, and secondary metastatic ovarian tumours. DESIGN Observational diagnostic study using prospectively collected clinical and ultrasound data. SETTING 24 ultrasound centres in 10 countries. PARTICIPANTS Women with an ovarian (including para-ovarian and tubal) mass and who underwent a standardised ultrasound examination before surgery. The model was developed on 3506 patients recruited between 1999 and 2007, temporally validated on 2403 patients recruited between 2009 and 2012, and then updated on all 5909 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Histological classification and surgical staging of the mass. RESULTS The Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model contains three clinical and six ultrasound predictors: age, serum CA-125 level, type of centre (oncology centres v other hospitals), maximum diameter of lesion, proportion of solid tissue, more than 10 cyst locules, number of papillary projections, acoustic shadows, and ascites. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the classic discrimination between benign and malignant tumours was 0.94 (0.93 to 0.95) on temporal validation. The AUC was 0.85 for benign versus borderline, 0.92 for benign versus stage I cancer, 0.99 for benign versus stage II-IV cancer, and 0.95 for benign versus secondary metastatic. AUCs between malignant subtypes varied between 0.71 and 0.95, with an AUC of 0.75 for borderline versus stage I cancer and 0.82 for stage II-IV versus secondary metastatic. Calibration curves showed that the estimated risks were accurate. CONCLUSIONS The ADNEX model discriminates well between benign and malignant tumours and offers fair to excellent discrimination between four types of ovarian malignancy. The use of ADNEX has the potential to improve triage and management decisions and so reduce morbidity and mortality associated with adnexal pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kirsten Van Hoorde
- Department of Electrical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium iMinds Medical Information Technologies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lil Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Antonia C Testa
- Department of Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynaecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Luca Savelli
- Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine Unit, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Dorella Franchi
- Preventive Gynaecology Unit, Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabeth Epstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jeroen Kaijser
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vanya Van Belle
- Department of Electrical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium iMinds Medical Information Technologies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Artur Czekierdowski
- 1st Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Stefano Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Chiara Lanzani
- Department of Woman, Mother and Neonate, Buzzi Children's Hospital, Biological and Clinical School of Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Felice Scala
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Naples, Italy
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mascilini F, Moruzzi C, Giansiracusa C, Guastafierro F, Savelli L, De Meis L, Epstein E, Timor-Tritsch IE, Mailath-Pokorny M, Ercoli A, Exacoustos C, Benacerraf BR, Valentin L, Testa AC. Imaging in gynecological disease. 10: Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of decidualized endometriomas surgically removed during pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44:354-360. [PMID: 24496773 DOI: 10.1002/uog.13323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 01/22/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the clinical history and ultrasound findings in women with decidualized endometriomas surgically removed during pregnancy. METHODS In this retrospective study, women with a histological diagnosis of decidualized endometrioma during pregnancy who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination were identified from the databases of seven ultrasound centers. The ultrasound appearance of the tumors was described on the basis of ultrasound images, ultrasound reports and research protocols (when applicable) by one author from each center using the terms and definitions of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. In addition, two authors reviewed together available digital ultrasound images and used pattern recognition to describe the typical ultrasound appearance of decidualized endometriomas. RESULTS Eighteen eligible women were identified. Median age was 34 (range, 20-43) years. Median gestational age at surgical removal of the decidualized endometrioma was 18 (range, 11-41) weeks. Seventeen women (94%) were asymptomatic and one presented with pelvic pain. In three of the 18 women an ultrasound diagnosis of endometrioma had been made before pregnancy. The original ultrasound examiner was uncertain whether the mass was benign or malignant in 10 (56%) women and suggested a diagnosis of benignity in nine (50%) women, borderline in eight women (44%), and invasive malignancy in one (6%) woman. Seventeen decidualized endometriomas contained a papillary projection, and in 16 of these at least one of the papillary projections was vascularized at power or color Doppler examination. The number of cyst locules varied between one (n = 11) and four. No woman had ascites. When using pattern recognition, most decidualized endometriomas (14/17, 82%) were described as manifesting vascularized rounded papillary projections with a smooth contour in an ovarian cyst with one or a few cyst locules and ground-glass or low-level echogenicity of the cyst fluid. CONCLUSIONS Rounded vascularized papillary projections with smooth contours within an ovarian cyst with cyst contents of ground-glass or low-level echogenicity are typical of surgically removed decidualized endometriomas in pregnant women, most of whom are asymptomatic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Mascilini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zannoni L, Savelli L, Jokubkiene L, Di Legge A, Condous G, Testa AC, Sladkevicius P, Valentin L. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44:100-108. [PMID: 24307182 DOI: 10.1002/uog.13273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2013] [Revised: 11/14/2013] [Accepted: 11/22/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate intraobserver repeatability and interobserver agreement in assessing the presence of papillary projections in adnexal masses and in classifying adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology for ultrasound examiners with different levels of experience. We also aimed to identify ultrasound findings that cause confusion and might be interpreted differently by different observers, and to determine if repeatability and agreement change after consensus has been reached on how to interpret 'problematic' ultrasound images. METHODS Digital clips (two to eight clips per adnexal mass) with gray-scale and color/power Doppler information of 83 adnexal masses in 80 patients were evaluated independently four times, twice before and twice after a consensus meeting, by four experienced and three less experienced ultrasound observers. The variables analyzed were tumor type (unilocular, unilocular solid, multilocular, multilocular solid, solid) and presence of papillary projections. Intraobserver repeatability was evaluated for each observer (percentage agreement, Cohen's kappa). Interobserver agreement was estimated for all seven observers (percentage agreement, Fleiss kappa, Cohen's kappa). RESULTS There was uncertainty about how to define a solid component and a papillary projection, but consensus was reached at the consensus meeting. Interobserver agreement for tumor type was good both before and after the consensus meeting, with no clear improvement after the meeting, mean percentage agreement being 76.0% (Fleiss kappa, 0.695) before the meeting and 75.4% (Fleiss kappa, 0.682) after the meeting. Interobserver agreement with regard to papillary projections was moderate both before and after the consensus meeting, with no clear improvement after the meeting, mean percentage agreement being 86.6% (Fleiss kappa, 0.536) before the meeting and 82.7% (Fleiss kappa, 0.487) after it. There was substantial variability in pairwise agreement for papillary projections (Cohen's kappa, 0.148-0.787). Intraobserver repeatability with regard to tumor type was very good and similar before and after the consensus meeting (agreement 87-95%, kappa, 0.83-0.94). With regard to papillary projections intraobserver repeatability was good or very good both before and after the consensus meeting (agreement 88-100%, kappa, 0.64-1.0). CONCLUSIONS Despite uncertainty about how to define solid components, interobserver agreement was good for tumor type. The interobserver agreement for papillary projection was moderate but very variable between observer pairs. The term 'papillary projection' might need a more precise definition. The consensus meeting did not change inter- or intraobserver agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Zannoni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Testa A, Kaijser J, Wynants L, Fischerova D, Van Holsbeke C, Franchi D, Savelli L, Epstein E, Czekierdowski A, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Leone FPG, Vergote I, Bourne T, Valentin L, Van Calster B, Timmerman D. Strategies to diagnose ovarian cancer: new evidence from phase 3 of the multicentre international IOTA study. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:680-8. [PMID: 24937676 PMCID: PMC4134495 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2014] [Revised: 05/12/2014] [Accepted: 05/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To compare different ultrasound-based international ovarian tumour analysis (IOTA) strategies and risk of malignancy index (RMI) for ovarian cancer diagnosis using a meta-analysis approach of centre-specific data from IOTA3. Methods: This prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study included 2403 patients with 1423 benign and 980 malignant adnexal masses from 2009 until 2012. All patients underwent standardised transvaginal ultrasonography. Test performance of RMI, subjective assessment (SA) of ultrasound findings, two IOTA risk models (LR1 and LR2), and strategies involving combinations of IOTA simple rules (SRs), simple descriptors (SDs) and LR2 with and without SA was estimated using a meta-analysis approach. Reference standard was histology after surgery. Results: The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves of LR1, LR2, SA and RMI were 0.930 (0.917–0.942), 0.918 (0.905–0.930), 0.914 (0.886–0.936) and 0.875 (0.853–0.894). Diagnostic one-step and two-step strategies using LR1, LR2, SR and SD achieved summary estimates for sensitivity 90–96%, specificity 74–79% and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 32.8–50.5. Adding SA when IOTA methods yielded equivocal results improved performance (DOR 57.6–75.7). Risk of Malignancy Index had sensitivity 67%, specificity 91% and DOR 17.5. Conclusions: This study shows all IOTA strategies had excellent diagnostic performance in comparison with RMI. The IOTA strategy chosen may be determined by clinical preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Testa
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 8, Rome 00165, Italy
| | - J Kaijser
- 1] KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Herestraat 49 Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium [2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Wynants
- 1] KU Leuven Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-STADIUS), Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001 Leuven, Belgium [2] iMinds Future Health Department, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecological Oncology Center, Charles University, Apolinarska 18, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium
| | - D Franchi
- Preventive Gynaecology Unit, Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - L Savelli
- Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Staszica 16, 20-081 Lublin, Poland
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Strada Statale 554 Monserrato, Cagliari 09045, Italy
| | - R Fruscio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi, 33, 20052 Monza, Italy
| | - F P G Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of Milan, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Bourne
- 1] KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Herestraat 49 Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium [2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium [3] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Södra Förstadsgatan, 20502 Malmö, Sweden
| | - B Van Calster
- KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Herestraat 49 Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Timmerman
- 1] KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Herestraat 49 Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium [2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ludovisi M, De Blasis I, Virgilio B, Fischerova D, Franchi D, Pascual MA, Savelli L, Epstein E, Van Holsbeke C, Guerriero S, Czekierdowski A, Zannoni G, Scambia G, Jurkovic D, Rossi A, Timmerman D, Valentin L, Testa AC. Imaging in gynecological disease (9): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of tubal cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43:328-335. [PMID: 23893713 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2013] [Revised: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 07/16/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe clinical history and ultrasound findings in patients with tubal carcinoma. METHODS Patients with a histological diagnosis of tubal cancer who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination were identified from the databases of 13 ultrasound centers. The tumors were described by the principal investigator at each contributing center on the basis of ultrasound images, ultrasound reports and research protocols (when applicable) using the terms and definitions of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. In addition, three authors reviewed together all available digital ultrasound images and described them using subjective evaluation of gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound findings. RESULTS We identified 79 women with a histological diagnosis of primary tubal cancer, 70 of whom (89%) had serous carcinomas and 46 (58%) of whom presented at FIGO stage III. Forty-nine (62%) women were asymptomatic (incidental finding), whilst the remaining 30 complained of abdominal bloating or pain. Fifty-three (67%) tumors were described as solid at ultrasound examination, 14 (18%) as multilocular solid, 10 (13%) as unilocular solid and two (3%) as unilocular. No tumor was described as a multilocular mass. Most tumors (70/79, 89%) were moderately or very well vascularized on color or power Doppler ultrasound. Normal ovarian tissue was identified adjacent to the tumor in 51% (39/77) of cases. Three types of ultrasound appearance were identified as being typical of tubal carcinoma using pattern recognition: a sausage-shaped cystic structure with solid tissue protruding into it like a papillary projection (11/62, 18%); a sausage-shaped cystic structure with a large solid component filling part of the cyst cavity (13/62, 21%); an ovoid or oblong completely solid mass (36/62, 58%). CONCLUSIONS A well vascularized ovoid or sausage-shaped structure, either completely solid or with large solid component(s) in the pelvis, should raise the suspicion of tubal cancer, especially if normal ovarian tissue is seen adjacent to it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ludovisi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Savelli L, Fabbri F, Di Donato N, De Meis L. Heterotopic interstitial pregnancy successfully treated with ultrasound-guided potassium chloride injection in the ectopic embryo. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2014; 34:276-7. [PMID: 24484073 DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2013.861394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L Savelli
- Gynecology and Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Unit, S. Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna , Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mabrouk M, Di Donato N, Montanari G, Savelli L, Ferrini G, Seracchioli R. Do women with deep infiltrating endometriosis have more tubal alterations? Objective evaluation of 473 patients. J Reprod Med 2013; 58:417-424. [PMID: 24050031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is associated with tubal alterations. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective study. Our study included 335 women with ovarian endometriosis (Group A), 66 women with DIE (Group B), and 72 women presenting with both conditions (Group C). We evaluated tubal morphology and patency during laparoscopic excision of endometriosis. Tubal patency was assessed by tubal dye test. Tubal morphology was determined using the tubal morphology score (TMS), obtained by a total grade of 4 parameters: tubal caliber, course, surface and fimbrial morphology. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the 3 groups regarding the presence of tubal occlusion (p = 0.23). Total TMS was not significantly different in the 3 groups (p = 0.13). A history of surgical treatment for endometriosis was associated with higher rate of tubal occlusion (p < 0.0005) and more severe morphological alterations (p < 0.0005). There was a positive correlation between number of previous surgical interventions and worse TMS (rho = 0.197, p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION Alterations in tubal patency and morphology were not significantly different in patients with DIE as compared to women with ovarian endometriosis. History of surgical interventions for endometriosis was related with the presence of tubal alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Mabrouk
- Minimally Invasive Gynecology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zannoni L, Savelli L, Jokubkiene L, Di Legge A, Condous G, Testa AC, Sladkevicius P, Valentin L. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of assessment of Doppler ultrasound findings in adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:93-101. [PMID: 23065868 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate intra- and interobserver reproducibility and reliability of assessment of the color content in adnexal masses at color/power Doppler ultrasound examination for observers with different levels of experience, and to determine if they change after a consensus meeting. METHODS Digital clips with color/power Doppler information on 103 adnexal masses were evaluated independently four times, twice before and twice after a consensus meeting, by four experienced and three less experienced ultrasound examiners. The color content of the adnexal mass was estimated using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis color score and a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS score). Intraobserver repeatability was estimated for each observer. Interobserver agreement was estimated for the four most experienced observers (six pairs), for the three less experienced observers (three pairs), and for four other pairs of observers, each pair consisting of one of the experienced and one of the less-experienced observers. RESULTS Intra- and interobserver agreement for the color score was moderate to very good, percentage agreement ranging from 48 to 82.5% (kappa, 0.52-0.82) before and from 59 to 90% (kappa, 0.60-0.88) after the consensus meeting. For seven of 13 pairs of observers, interobserver agreement improved after the consensus meeting. Intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for the VAS score ranged from 0.80 to 0.92 before and from 0.75 to 0.94 after the consensus meeting, but limits of agreement were wide (± 20-35 mm). For six of the seven observers the ICC values were higher after the consensus meeting than before. Interobserver ICC values for the VAS score ranged from 0.77 to 0.88 before and from 0.77 to 0.91 after the consensus meeting, but limits of agreement were wide (± 30-40 mm). For 10 of 13 pairs of observers the ICC values improved after the consensus meeting. CONCLUSIONS Intra- and interobserver agreement for the color score was good, especially after the consensus meeting, but there is room for improvement. VAS score results varied substantially within and between observers both before and after the consensus meeting. General consensus needs to be reached about how to interpret color/power Doppler ultrasound findings in adnexal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Zannoni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Valentin L, Ameye L, Savelli L, Fruscio R, Leone FPG, Czekierdowski A, Lissoni AA, Fischerova D, Guerriero S, Van Holsbeke C, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41:570-581. [PMID: 22915541 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a logistic regression model for discrimination between benign and malignant unilocular solid cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components, and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of subjective evaluation of ultrasound findings (subjective assessment), CA 125 and the risk of malignancy index (RMI). METHODS Among the 3511 adnexal masses in the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database there were 252 (7%) unilocular solid cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components ('unilocular cysts with papillations'). All had been examined with transvaginal ultrasound using the IOTA standardized research protocol. The ultrasound examiner had also classified each mass as certainly or probably benign, unclassifiable, or certainly or probably malignant. A logistic regression model to discriminate between benignity and malignancy was developed for all unilocular cysts with papillations (175 tumors in the training set and 77 in the test set) and for unilocular cysts with papillations for which the ultrasound examiner was not certain about benignity/malignancy (113 tumors in the training set and 53 in the test set). The gold standard was the histological diagnosis of the surgically removed adnexal mass. RESULTS A model containing six variables was developed for all unilocular cysts with papillations. The model had an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) on the test set of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.93). The optimal risk cut-off, as defined on the training set (0.35), resulted in sensitivity 69% (20/29), specificity 79% (38/48), positive likelihood ratio (LR +) 3.31 and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.39 on the test set. The corresponding values for subjective assessment when using the ultrasound examiner's dichotomous classification of the mass as benign or malignant were 97% (28/29), 79% (38/48), 4.63 and 0.04. A model containing four variables was developed for unilocular cysts with papillations for which the ultrasound examiner was not certain about benignity/malignancy. The model had an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.60-0.88) on the test set. The optimal risk cut-off of the model, as defined on the training set (0.30), resulted in sensitivity 57% (12/21), specificity 78% (25/32), LR + 2.61 and LR- 0.55 on the test set. The corresponding values for subjective assessment were 95% (20/21), 78% (25/32), 4.35 and 0.06. CA 125 and RMI had virtually no diagnostic ability. CONCLUSIONS Even though logistic regression models to predict malignancy in unilocular cysts with papillations can be developed, they have at most moderate performance and are not superior to subjective assessment for discrimination between benignity and malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Savelli L, Fabbri F, Moruzzi C, Testa AC. Misdiagnosed ectopic pregnancy mimicking adnexal malignancy: a report of two cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41:223-225. [PMID: 22744800 DOI: 10.1002/uog.11220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
We present two cases of nulliparous women with no history of amenorrhea who were referred to our unit following finding of a hypervascularized solid adnexal mass. In both cases a malignant tumor of tubal origin was suspected at transvaginal sonography. However, following laparoscopy, histological examination revealed that the masses were the result of an undetected tubal ectopic pregnancy that had failed spontaneously, with massive vasodilatation of pelvic blood vessels surrounding the trophoblastic tissue. We recommend consideration of the potential diagnosis of a previously undetected, failed tubal ectopic pregnancy in fertile women presenting with an adnexal mass, even when there is no history of amenorrhea or a positive pregnancy test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Savelli
- Gynecology and Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Unit, S. Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Valentin L, Ameye L, Franchi D, Guerriero S, Jurkovic D, Savelli L, Fischerova D, Lissoni A, Van Holsbeke C, Fruscio R, Van Huffel S, Testa A, Timmerman D. Risk of malignancy in unilocular cysts: a study of 1148 adnexal masses classified as unilocular cysts at transvaginal ultrasound and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41:80-89. [PMID: 23001924 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of malignancy in adnexal lesions described as unilocular cysts at transvaginal ultrasound examination and to investigate if there are differences in clinical and ultrasound characteristics between benign and malignant unilocular cysts. METHODS A total of 3511 patients with an adnexal mass underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination between 1999 and 2007. Sonologists used the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions to describe their ultrasound findings. Only masses operated on within 120 days after the ultrasound examination were included in the analysis and the histopathological diagnosis of the mass was used as the gold standard. RESULTS Of the 3511 masses, 1148 (33%) were classified as unilocular cysts on ultrasound. Of these, 11 (0.96% (95% CI, 0.48-1.71)) were malignant. The malignancy rate was lower in premenopausal than in postmenopausal women: 0.54% (5/931; 95% CI, 0.17-1.25) vs. 2.76% (6/217; 95% CI, 1.02-5.92); P = 0.009. More patients with malignant unilocular cysts had a personal history of breast cancer (18% vs. 2%; P = 0.02) or ovarian cancer (18% vs 0.6%; P = 0.003). Hemorrhagic cyst contents on ultrasound were more common in malignant than in benign unilocular cysts (18% vs. 2%; P = 0.03). In seven of the 11 malignancies judged to be unilocular cysts at scan, papillary projections or other solid components were seen at macroscopic inspection of the surgical specimen. CONCLUSIONS The malignancy rate in surgically removed adnexal lesions judged to be unilocular cysts at transvaginal scan is c 1%. Postmenopausal status, personal history of breast or ovarian cancer and hemorrhagic cyst contents on ultrasound increase the risk of malignancy. To avoid misclassifying adnexal lesions as unilocular cysts at scan, it is important to scrutinize unilocular cysts for the presence of solid components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ameye L, Timmerman D, Valentin L, Paladini D, Zhang J, Van Holsbeke C, Lissoni AA, Savelli L, Veldman J, Testa AC, Amant F, Van Huffel S, Bourne T. Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40:582-591. [PMID: 22511559 DOI: 10.1002/uog.11177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2012] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic performance of ultrasound-based simple rules, risk of malignancy index (RMI), two logistic regression models (LR1 and LR2) and real-time subjective assessment by experienced ultrasound examiners following the exclusion of masses likely to be judged as easy and 'instant' to diagnose by an ultrasound examiner, and to develop a new strategy for the assessment of adnexal pathology based on this. METHODS 3511 patients with at least one persistent adnexal mass preoperatively underwent transvaginal ultrasonography to assess tumor morphology and vascularity. They were included in two consecutive prospective studies by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group: Phase 1 (1999-2005), development of the simple rules and logistic regression models LR1 and LR2, and Phase 2, a validation study (2005-2007). RESULTS Almost half of the cases (43%) were identified as 'instant' to diagnose on the basis of descriptors applied to the database. To assess diagnostic performance in the more difficult 'non-instant' masses, we used only Phase 2 data (n = 1036). The sensitivity of LR2 was 88%, of RMI it was 41% and of subjective assessment it was 87%. The specificity of LR2 was 67%, of RMI it was 90% and of subjective assessment it was 86%. The simple rules yielded a conclusive result in almost 2/3 of the masses, where they resulted in sensitivity and specificity similar to those of real-time subjective assessment by experienced ultrasound examiners: sensitivity 89 vs 89% (P = 0.76), specificity 91 vs 91% (P = 0.65). When a three-step strategy was applied with easy 'instant' diagnoses as Step 1, simple rules where conclusive as Step 2 and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound examiner in the remaining masses as Step 3, we obtained a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 92% compared with sensitivity 90% (P = 0.03) and specificity 93% (P = 0.44) when using real-time subjective assessment by experts in all tumors. CONCLUSION A diagnostic strategy using simple descriptors and ultrasound rules when applied to the variables contained in the IOTA database obtains results that are at least as good as those obtained by subjective assessment of a mass by an expert.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ameye
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Di Legge A, Testa A, Ameye L, Van Calster B, Leone F, Savelli L, Franchi D, Maria E, Scambia G, Timmerman D, Valentin L. W111 LESION SIZE AFFECTS THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL OVARIAN TUMOR ANALYSIS (IOTA) LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS, THE IOTA SIMPLE RULES AND THE RISK OF MALIGNANCY INDEX TO ESTIMATE THE RISK OF MALIGNANCY IN ADNEXAL MASSES. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(12)61836-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
40
|
Di Legge A, Testa AC, Ameye L, Van Calster B, Lissoni AA, Leone FPG, Savelli L, Franchi D, Czekierdowski A, Trio D, Van Holsbeke C, Ferrazzi E, Scambia G, Timmerman D, Valentin L. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40:345-354. [PMID: 22611001 DOI: 10.1002/uog.11167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/06/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the ability to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses of different size using: subjective assessment, two International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) logistic regression models (LR1 and LR2), the IOTA simple rules and the risk of malignancy index (RMI). METHODS We used a multicenter IOTA database of 2445 patients with at least one adnexal mass, i.e. the database previously used to prospectively validate the diagnostic performance of LR1 and LR2. The masses were categorized into three subgroups according to their largest diameter: small tumors (diameter < 4 cm; n = 396), medium-sized tumors (diameter, 4-9.9 cm; n = 1457) and large tumors (diameter ≥ 10 cm, n = 592). Subjective assessment, LR1 and LR2, IOTA simple rules and the RMI were applied to each of the three groups. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+, LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) were used to describe diagnostic performance. A moving window technique was applied to estimate the effect of tumor size as a continuous variable on the AUC. The reference standard was the histological diagnosis of the surgically removed adnexal mass. RESULTS The frequency of invasive malignancy was 10% in small tumors, 19% in medium-sized tumors and 40% in large tumors; 11% of the large tumors were borderline tumors vs 3% and 4%, respectively, of the small and medium-sized tumors. The type of benign histology also differed among the three subgroups. For all methods, sensitivity with regard to malignancy was lowest in small tumors (56-84% vs 67-93% in medium-sized tumors and 74-95% in large tumors) while specificity was lowest in large tumors (60-87%vs 83-95% in medium-sized tumors and 83-96% in small tumors ). The DOR and the AUC value were highest in medium-sized tumors and the AUC was largest in tumors with a largest diameter of 7-11 cm. CONCLUSION Tumor size affects the performance of subjective assessment, LR1 and LR2, the IOTA simple rules and the RMI in discriminating correctly between benign and malignant adnexal masses. The likely explanation, at least in part, is the difference in histology among tumors of different size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Di Legge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ghi T, De Musso F, Maroni E, Youssef A, Savelli L, Farina A, Casadio P, Filicori M, Pilu G, Rizzo N. The pregnancy outcome in women with incidental diagnosis of septate uterus at first trimester scan. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:2671-5. [PMID: 22752609 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tullio Ghi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Savelli L, Testa AC, Mabrouk M, Zannoni L, Ludovisi M, Seracchioli R, Scambia G, De Iaco P. A prospective blinded comparison of the accuracy of transvaginal sonography and frozen section in the assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 124:549-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2011] [Revised: 11/09/2011] [Accepted: 11/11/2011] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
43
|
Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Di Donato N, Salfi N, Trivella G, Ceccaroni M, Seracchioli R. Endometriosis of the abdominal wall: ultrasonographic and Doppler characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:336-340. [PMID: 21793086 DOI: 10.1002/uog.10052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the sonographic and clinical features of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE), a frequently misdiagnosed condition. METHODS This was a retrospective study of 21 consecutive women with pathologically proven endometriosis of the abdominal wall. Ultrasonographic and Doppler examinations were performed, before surgery, with a high-frequency linear transducer. The clinical data and the results of the sonographic examinations were reviewed and described. RESULTS At ultrasound, all the nodules appeared as discrete solid masses that were less echogenic than the surrounding hyperechoic fat. The nodules had a median diameter of 20 (range, 5-50) mm and in 18/21 (86%) cases the nodules had a round/oval shape. In eight of 21 (38%) women the AWE was located at the umbilicus, in six of 21 (29%) it was between the transverse suprapubic line and the umbilicus, in five of 21 (24%) it was found along the scar of a previous Cesarean section and in two of 21 (9%) it was in the right inguinal canal. The content was homogeneously hypoechoic in 12/21 (57%) women and inhomogeneous in the other nine (43%). The outer borders were invariably ill defined. Scarce blood vessels were found by power Doppler. Cyclic or continuous spontaneous pain at the level of the AWE was present in 19/21 (91%) cases, and two (9%) patients were asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS Hypoechoic round/oval nodules with ill-defined borders and a hyperechoic rim should raise the suspicion of abdominal wall endometriosis, even in patients with no history of endometriosis or previous laparotomic surgery. Pressing the ultrasound probe against the nodule should reinforce a suspected diagnosis because of the pain it induces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Savelli
- Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Youssef A, Savelli L, Ghi T, Spagnolo E, Guasina F, Casadio P. Re: preoperative assessment of submucous fibroids by three-dimensional saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:116-117. [PMID: 22012850 DOI: 10.1002/uog.10125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
|
45
|
Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Bourne T, Ajossa S, Testa AC, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Lissoni AA, Czekierdowski A, Savelli L, Van Huffel S, Valentin L, Timmerman D. External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 18:815-25. [PMID: 22114135 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To externally validate and compare the performance of previously published diagnostic models developed to predict malignancy in adnexal masses. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We externally validated the diagnostic performance of 11 models developed by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group and 12 other (non-IOTA) models on 997 prospectively collected patients. The non-IOTA models included the original risk of malignancy index (RMI), three modified versions of the RMI, six logistic regression models, and two artificial neural networks. The ability of the models to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LR(+), LR(-)). RESULTS Seven hundred and forty-two (74%) benign and 255 (26%) malignant masses were included. The IOTA models did better than the non-IOTA models (AUCs between 0.941 and 0.956 vs. 0.839 and 0.928). The difference in AUC between the best IOTA and the best non-IOTA model was 0.028 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.011-0.044]. The AUC of the RMI was 0.911 (difference with the best IOTA model, 0.044; 95% CI, 0.024-0.064). The superior performance of the IOTA models was most pronounced in premenopausal patients but was also observed in postmenopausal patients. IOTA models were better able to detect stage I ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION External validation shows that the IOTA models outperform other models, including the current reference test RMI, for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Valentin L, Ameye L, Savelli L, Fruscio R, Leone FPG, Czekierdowski A, Lissoni AA, Fischerova D, Guerriero S, Van Holsbeke C, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38:456-465. [PMID: 21520475 DOI: 10.1002/uog.9030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/08/2011] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a logistic regression model that can discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses perceived to be difficult to classify by subjective evaluation of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (subjective assessment) and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of subjective assessment, serum CA 125 and the risk of malignancy index (RMI). METHODS We used data from the 3511 patients with an adnexal mass included in the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies. All patients had been examined using transvaginal gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound following a standardized research protocol carried out by an experienced ultrasound examiner using a high-end ultrasound system. In addition to prospectively collecting information on > 40 clinical and ultrasound variables, the ultrasound examiner classified each mass as certainly or probably benign, unclassifiable, or certainly or probably malignant. A logistic regression model to discriminate between benignity and malignancy was developed for the unclassifiable masses (n = 244, i.e. 7% of all tumors) using a training set (160 tumors, 45 malignancies) and then tested on a test set (84 tumors, 28 malignancies). The gold standard was the histological diagnosis of the surgically removed adnexal mass. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were used to describe diagnostic performance and were compared between subjective assessment, CA 125, the RMI and the logistic regression model created. RESULTS One variable was retained in the logistic regression model: the largest diameter (in mm) of the largest solid component of the tumor (odds ratio (OR) = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06). The model had an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.59-0.78) on the training set and an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53-0.78) on the test set. On the test set, a cut-off of 25% probability of malignancy (corresponding to the largest diameter of the largest solid component of 23 mm) resulted in a sensitivity of 64% (18/28), a specificity of 55% (31/56), an LR+ of 1.44 and an LR- of 0.65. The corresponding values for subjective assessment were 68% (19/28), 59% (33/56), 1.65 and 0.55. On the test set of patients with available CA 125 results, the LR+ and LR- of the logistic regression model (cut-off = 25% probability of malignancy) were 1.29 and 0.73, of subjective assessment were 1.45 and 0.63, of CA 125 (cut-off = 35 U/mL) were 1.24 and 0.84 and of RMI (cut-off = 200) were 1.21 and 0.92. CONCLUSIONS About 7% of adnexal masses that are considered appropriate for surgical removal cannot be classified as benign or malignant by experienced ultrasound examiners using subjective assessment. Logistic regression models to estimate the risk of malignancy, CA 125 measurements and the RMI are not helpful in these masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Coe M, Mabrouk M, Di Donato N, Venturoli S, Seracchioli R. Comparison of transvaginal sonography and double-contrast barium enema for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis of the posterior compartment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38:466-471. [PMID: 21656868 DOI: 10.1002/uog.9072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) in the preoperative detection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) of the posterior compartment. METHODS This was a prospective study of 69 consecutive patients with results of pelvic examination or symptoms suggestive of DIE of the posterior compartment. TVS and DCBE were performed before surgery by two groups of physicians specialized in endometriosis, each blinded to the results of the other technique. Imaging data were compared with histopathologic analysis of the resected specimen (gold standard). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and test accuracies were calculated for both imaging modalities. RESULTS Sixty seven of the 69 women had a nodule of DIE confirmed at laparoscopy and histopathologic examination. TVS diagnosed DIE in 57 (85%) of these patients, while DCBE revealed the presence of the lesion in 24 (36%) women. For the diagnosis of posterior DIE, TVS and DCBE had, respectively, a sensitivity of 85% and 36%, specificity of 100% and 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and 100%, negative predictive value of 17% and 4% and accuracy of 85.5% and 38%. In patients with pure bowel DIE the sensitivity was 91% and 43%, specificity was 100% and 100%, positive predictive value was 100% and 100%, negative predictive value was 29% and 6% and accuracy was 91% and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS TVS has a much higher sensitivity than does DCBE in detecting the presence of posterior DIE and should thus be regarded as the imaging modality of choice when there is clinical suspicion of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Savelli
- Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Casadio P, Youssef AM, Spagnolo E, Rizzo MA, Talamo MR, De Angelis D, Marra E, Ghi T, Savelli L, Farina A, Pelusi G, Mazzon I. Should the myometrial free margin still be considered a limiting factor for hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids? A possible answer to an old question. Fertil Steril 2011; 95:1764-8.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2010] [Revised: 12/31/2010] [Accepted: 01/07/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
49
|
Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D, Epstein E, Melis GB, Guerriero S, Van Holsbeke C, Savelli L, Fruscio R, Lissoni AA, Testa AC, Veldman J, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Bourne T, Valentin L. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ 2010; 341:c6839. [PMID: 21156740 PMCID: PMC3001703 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c6839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of simple ultrasound rules to predict benignity/malignancy in an adnexal mass and to test the performance of the risk of malignancy index, two logistic regression models, and subjective assessment of ultrasonic findings by an experienced ultrasound examiner in adnexal masses for which the simple rules yield an inconclusive result. DESIGN Prospective temporal and external validation of simple ultrasound rules to distinguish benign from malignant adnexal masses. The rules comprised five ultrasonic features (including shape, size, solidity, and results of colour Doppler examination) to predict a malignant tumour (M features) and five to predict a benign tumour (B features). If one or more M features were present in the absence of a B feature, the mass was classified as malignant. If one or more B features were present in the absence of an M feature, it was classified as benign. If both M features and B features were present, or if none of the features was present, the simple rules were inconclusive. SETTING 19 ultrasound centres in eight countries. PARTICIPANTS 1938 women with an adnexal mass examined with ultrasound by the principal investigator at each centre with a standardised research protocol. Reference standard Histological classification of the excised adnexal mass as benign or malignant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS Of the 1938 patients with an adnexal mass, 1396 (72%) had benign tumours, 373 (19.2%) had primary invasive tumours, 111 (5.7%) had borderline malignant tumours, and 58 (3%) had metastatic tumours in the ovary. The simple rules yielded a conclusive result in 1501 (77%) masses, for which they resulted in a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval 89% to 94%) and a specificity of 96% (94% to 97%). The corresponding sensitivity and specificity of subjective assessment were 91% (88% to 94%) and 96% (94% to 97%). In the 357 masses for which the simple rules yielded an inconclusive result and with available results of CA-125 measurements, the sensitivities were 89% (83% to 93%) for subjective assessment, 50% (42% to 58%) for the risk of malignancy index, 89% (83% to 93%) for logistic regression model 1, and 82% (75% to 87%) for logistic regression model 2; the corresponding specificities were 78% (72% to 83%), 84% (78% to 88%), 44% (38% to 51%), and 48% (42% to 55%). Use of the simple rules as a triage test and subjective assessment for those masses for which the simple rules yielded an inconclusive result gave a sensitivity of 91% (88% to 93%) and a specificity of 93% (91% to 94%), compared with a sensitivity of 90% (88% to 93%) and a specificity of 93% (91% to 94%) when subjective assessment was used in all masses. CONCLUSIONS The use of the simple rules has the potential to improve the management of women with adnexal masses. In adnexal masses for which the rules yielded an inconclusive result, subjective assessment of ultrasonic findings by an experienced ultrasound examiner was the most accurate diagnostic test; the risk of malignancy index and the two regression models were not useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa AC, Guerriero S, Fischerova D, Lissoni AA, Van Holsbeke C, Fruscio R, Czekierdowski A, Jurkovic D, Savelli L, Vergote I, Bourne T, Van Huffel S, Valentin L. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:226-234. [PMID: 20455203 DOI: 10.1002/uog.7636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of the study were to temporally and externally validate the diagnostic performance of two logistic regression models containing clinical and ultrasound variables in order to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses, and to compare the results with the subjective interpretation of ultrasound findings carried out by an experienced ultrasound examiner ('subjective assessment'). METHODS Patients with adnexal masses, who were put forward by the 19 centers participating in the study, underwent a standardized transvaginal ultrasound examination by a gynecologist or a radiologist specialized in ultrasonography. The examiner prospectively collected information on clinical and ultrasound variables, and classified each mass as benign or malignant on the basis of subjective evaluation of ultrasound findings. The gold standard was the histology of the mass with local clinicians deciding whether to operate on the basis of ultrasound results and the clinical picture. The models' ability to discriminate between malignant and benign masses was assessed, together with the accuracy of the risk estimates. RESULTS Of the 1938 patients included in the study, 1396 had benign, 373 had primary invasive, 111 had borderline malignant and 58 had metastatic tumors. On external validation (997 patients from 12 centers), the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) for a model containing 12 predictors (LR1) was 0.956, for a reduced model with six predictors (LR2) was 0.949 and for subjective assessment was 0.949. Subjective assessment gave a positive likelihood ratio of 11.0 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.14. The corresponding likelihood ratios for a previously derived probability threshold (0.1) were 6.84 and 0.09 for LR1, and 6.36 and 0.10 for LR2. On temporal validation (941 patients from seven centers), the AUCs were 0.945 (LR1), 0.918 (LR2) and 0.959 (subjective assessment). CONCLUSIONS Both models provide excellent discrimination between benign and malignant masses. Because the models provide an objective and reasonably accurate risk estimation, they may improve the management of women with suspected ovarian pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Timmerman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|