1
|
Stefano G, Condous G, Rolla M, Hudelist G, Ferrero S, Alcazar JL, Ajossa S, Bafort C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bourne T, Van den Bosch T, Singh SS, Abrao MS, Szabó G, Testa AC, Di Giovanni A, Fischerova D, Tomassetti C, Timmerman D. Addendum to the consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023. [PMID: 38057967 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Preoperative sonographic staging in patients with suspected parametrial endometriosis is essential to plan the surgical intervention and to anticipate the need for a multidisciplinary approach, and hence optimize surgical outcome. The results of a recent metanalysis suggest that defining more accurately the ultrasonographic criteria of parametrial involvement in endometriosis is needed. The aim of this addendum to the IDEA-consensus is to highlight the sonographic characteristics of the parametrium and identify ultrasound techniques to diagnose deep endometriosis in this area. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Stefano
- Centro Integrato di Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita (PMA) e Diagnostica Ostetrico-Ginecologica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Cagliari-Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Italy
- University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endoscopy Surgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Rolla
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - G Hudelist
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St John of God, Vienna, Austria
- Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic and Campus, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Ferrero
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - S Ajossa
- Centro Integrato di Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita (PMA) e Diagnostica Ostetrico-Ginecologica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Italy
| | - C Bafort
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Van Schoubroeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Bourne
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - T Van den Bosch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KU Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S S Singh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - M S Abrao
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficencia Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - G Szabó
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - A C Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - A Di Giovanni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery (Drs Giovanni), Avellino, Italy
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C Tomassetti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heremans R, Van den Bosch T, Sladkevicius P, Pascual MA, Alcazar JL, Timmerman D, Valentin L. Prospective geographical and temporal validation of three published mathematical models to calculate risk of endometrial malignancy in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62:608-610. [PMID: 37329559 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- R Heremans
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Van den Bosch
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, Pamplona, Spain
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Landolfo C, Bourne T, Froyman W, Van Calster B, Ceusters J, Testa AC, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Van Holsbeke C, Domali E, Fruscio R, Epstein E, Franchi D, Kudla MJ, Chiappa V, Alcazar JL, Leone FPG, Buonomo F, Coccia ME, Guerriero S, Deo N, Jokubkiene L, Savelli L, Fischerova D, Czekierdowski A, Kaijser J, Coosemans A, Scambia G, Vergote I, Timmerman D, Valentin L. Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two-step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 61:231-242. [PMID: 36178788 PMCID: PMC10107772 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous work has suggested that the ultrasound-based benign simple descriptors (BDs) can reliably exclude malignancy in a large proportion of women presenting with an adnexal mass. This study aimed to validate a modified version of the BDs and to validate a two-step strategy to estimate the risk of malignancy, in which the modified BDs are followed by the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model if modified BDs do not apply. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis using data from the 2-year interim analysis of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Phase-5 study, in which consecutive patients with at least one adnexal mass were recruited irrespective of subsequent management (conservative or surgery). The main outcome was classification of tumors as benign or malignant, based on histology or on clinical and ultrasound information during 1 year of follow-up. Multiple imputation was used when outcome based on follow-up was uncertain according to predefined criteria. RESULTS A total of 8519 patients were recruited at 36 centers between 2012 and 2015. We excluded patients who were already in follow-up at recruitment and all patients from 19 centers that did not fulfil our criteria for good-quality surgical and follow-up data, leaving 4905 patients across 17 centers for statistical analysis. Overall, 3441 (70%) tumors were benign, 978 (20%) malignant and 486 (10%) uncertain. The modified BDs were applicable in 1798/4905 (37%) tumors, of which 1786 (99.3%) were benign. The two-step strategy based on ADNEX without CA125 had an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). The risk of malignancy was slightly underestimated, but calibration varied between centers. A sensitivity analysis in which we expanded the definition of uncertain outcome resulted in 1419 (29%) tumors with uncertain outcome and an AUC of the two-step strategy without CA125 of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95). CONCLUSION A large proportion of adnexal masses can be classified as benign by the modified BDs. For the remaining masses, the ADNEX model can be used to estimate the risk of malignancy. This two-step strategy is convenient for clinical use. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Landolfo
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
| | - T. Bourne
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - W. Froyman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - B. Van Calster
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Biomedical Data SciencesLeiden University Medical Centre (LUMC)LeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J. Ceusters
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - A. C. Testa
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - L. Wynants
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of EpidemiologyCAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - P. Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - C. Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyZiekenhuis Oost‐LimburgGenkBelgium
| | - E. Domali
- First Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAlexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
| | - R. Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Milano‐Bicocca, San Gerardo HospitalMonzaItaly
| | - E. Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and EducationKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySödersjukhusetStockholmSweden
| | - D. Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of GynecologyEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - M. J. Kudla
- Department of Perinatology and Oncological GynecologyFaculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of SilesiaKatowicePoland
| | - V. Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyNational Cancer Institute of MilanMilanItaly
| | - J. L. Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyClinica Universidad de Navarra, School of MedicinePamplonaSpain
| | - F. P. G. Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBiomedical and Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of MilanMilanItaly
| | - F. Buonomo
- Institute for Maternal and Child HealthIRCCS ‘Burlo Garofolo’TriesteItaly
| | - M. E. Coccia
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - S. Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio CasulaCagliariItaly
| | - N. Deo
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWhipps Cross HospitalLondonUK
| | - L. Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - L. Savelli
- Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction UnitSant'Orsola‐Malpighi Hospital of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - D. Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University and General University Hospital in PraguePragueCzech Republic
| | - A. Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynecological Oncology and GynecologyMedical University of LublinLublinPoland
| | - J. Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIkazia HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - G. Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - I. Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - D. Timmerman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - L. Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D, Alcazar JL, Guerriero S, Martins WP. Importance of transient myometrial contractions in diagnosis of adenomyosis and congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57:651-653. [PMID: 32250499 DOI: 10.1002/uog.22036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- T Van den Bosch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Van Schoubroeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy
| | - W P Martins
- SEMEAR Fertilidade, Reproductive Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Van Den Bosch T, Verbakel JY, Valentin L, Wynants L, De Cock B, Pascual MA, Leone FPG, Sladkevicius P, Alcazar JL, Votino A, Fruscio R, Lanzani C, Van Holsbeke C, Rossi A, Jokubkiene L, Kudla M, Jakab A, Domali E, Epstein E, Van Pachterbeke C, Bourne T, Van Calster B, Timmerman D. Typical ultrasound features of various endometrial pathologies described using International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57:164-172. [PMID: 32484286 DOI: 10.1002/uog.22109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the ultrasound features of different endometrial and other intracavitary pathologies inpre- and postmenopausal women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding, using the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology. METHODS This was a prospective observational multicenter study of consecutive women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding. Unenhanced sonography with color Doppler and fluid-instillation sonography were performed. Endometrial sampling was performed according to each center's local protocol. The histological endpoints were cancer, atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), endometrial atrophy, proliferative or secretory endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, endometrial polyp, intracavitary leiomyoma and other. For fluid-instillation sonography, the histological endpoints were endometrial polyp, intracavitary leiomyoma and cancer. For each histological endpoint, we report typical ultrasound features using the IETA terminology. RESULTS The database consisted of 2856 consecutive women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding. Unenhanced sonography with color Doppler was performed in all cases and fluid-instillation sonography in 1857. In 2216 women, endometrial histology was available, and these comprised the study population. Median age was 49 years (range, 19-92 years), median parity was 2 (range, 0-10) and median body mass index was 24.9 kg/m2 (range, 16.0-72.1 kg/m2 ). Of the study population, 843 (38.0%) women were postmenopausal. Endometrial polyps were diagnosed in 751 (33.9%) women, intracavitary leiomyomas in 223 (10.1%) and endometrial cancer in 137 (6.2%). None (0% (95% CI, 0.0-5.5%)) of the 66 women with endometrial thickness < 3 mm had endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia/EIN. Endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia/EIN was found in three of 283 (1.1% (95% CI, 0.4-3.1%)) endometria with a three-layer pattern, in three of 459 (0.7% (95% CI, 0.2-1.9%)) endometria with a linear endometrial midline and in five of 337 (1.5% (95% CI, 0.6-3.4%)) cases with a single vessel without branching on unenhanced ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS The typical ultrasound features of endometrial cancer, polyps, hyperplasia and atrophy and intracavitary leiomyomas, are described using the IETA terminology. The detection of some easy-to-assess IETA features (i.e. endometrial thickness < 3 mm, three-layer pattern, linear midline and single vessel without branching) makes endometrial cancer unlikely. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Van Den Bosch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Y Verbakel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - L Wynants
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - B De Cock
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F P G Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - A Votino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - C Lanzani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - C Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - A Rossi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - L Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - M Kudla
- Department of Perinatology and Oncological Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - A Jakab
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - E Domali
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Van Pachterbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Brussels, Belgium
| | - T Bourne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - B Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ambrosio M, Testa AC, Moro F, Franchi D, Scifo MC, Rams N, Epstein E, Alcazar JL, Hidalgo JJ, Van Holsbeke C, Burgetova A, Dundr P, Cibula D, Fischerova D. Imaging in gynecological disease (19): clinical and ultrasound features of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (eGIST). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56:749-758. [PMID: 31909545 DOI: 10.1002/uog.21968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and sonographic characteristics of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (eGISTs). METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study. The data of patients with a histological diagnosis of eGIST who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination were retrieved from the databases of nine large European gynecologic oncology centers. One investigator from each center reviewed stored images and ultrasound reports, and described the lesions using the terminology of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis and Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment groups, following a predefined ultrasound evaluation form. Clinical, surgical and pathological information was also recorded. RESULTS Thirty-five women with an eGIST were identified; in 17 cases, the findings were incidental, and 18 cases were symptomatic. Median age was 57 years (range, 21-85 years). Tumor marker CA 125 was available in 23 (65.7%) patients, with a median level of 23 U/mL (range, 7-403 U/mL). The vast majority of eGISTs were intraperitoneal lesions (n = 32 (91.4%)); the remaining lesions were retroperitoneal (n = 2 (5.7%)) or preperitoneal (n = 1 (2.9%)). The most common site of the tumor was the abdomen (n = 23 (65.7%)), and less frequently the pelvis (n = 12 (34.3%)). eGISTs were typically large (median largest diameter, 79 mm) solid (n = 31 (88.6%)) tumors, and were less frequently multilocular-solid tumors (n = 4 (11.4%)). The echogenicity of solid tumors was uniform in 8/31 (25.8%) cases, which were all hypoechogenic. Twenty-three solid eGISTs were non-uniform, either with mixed echogenicity (9/23 (39.1%)) or with cystic areas (14/23 (60.9%)). The tumor shape was mainly lobular (n = 19 (54.3%)) or irregular (n = 10 (28.6%)). Tumors were typically richly vascularized (color score of 3 or 4, n = 31 (88.6%)) with no shadowing (n = 31 (88.6%)). Based on pattern recognition, eGISTs were usually correctly classified as a malignant lesion in the ultrasound reports (n = 32 (91.4%)), and the specific diagnosis of eGIST was the most frequent differential diagnosis (n = 16 (45.7%)), followed by primary ovarian cancer (n = 5 (14.3%)), lymphoma (n = 2 (5.7%)) and pedunculated uterine fibroid (n = 2 (5.7%)). CONCLUSIONS On ultrasound, eGISTs were usually solid, non-uniform pelvic or abdominal lobular tumors of mixed echogenicity, with or without cystic areas, with rich vascularization and no shadowing. The presence of a tumor with these features, without connection to the bowel wall, and not originating from the uterus or adnexa, is highly suspicious for eGIST. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ambrosio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A C Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - F Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - D Franchi
- Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - M C Scifo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - N Rams
- Hospital Santa Cruz y San Pablo, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet & Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - J J Hidalgo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinic Hospital Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - A Burgetova
- Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Dundr
- Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eriksson LSE, Epstein E, Testa AC, Fischerova D, Valentin L, Sladkevicius P, Franchi D, Frühauf F, Fruscio R, Haak LA, Opolskiene G, Mascilini F, Alcazar JL, Van Holsbeke C, Chiappa V, Bourne T, Lindqvist PG, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Verbakel JY, Van den Bosch T, Wynants L. Ultrasound-based risk model for preoperative prediction of lymph-node metastases in women with endometrial cancer: model-development study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56:443-452. [PMID: 31840873 DOI: 10.1002/uog.21950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a preoperative risk model, using endometrial biopsy results and clinical and ultrasound variables, to predict the individual risk of lymph-node metastases in women with endometrial cancer. METHODS A mixed-effects logistic regression model for prediction of lymph-node metastases was developed in 1501 prospectively included women with endometrial cancer undergoing transvaginal ultrasound examination before surgery, from 16 European centers. Missing data, including missing lymph-node status, were imputed. Discrimination, calibration and clinical utility of the model were evaluated using leave-center-out cross validation. The predictive performance of the model was compared with that of risk classification from endometrial biopsy alone (high-risk defined as endometrioid cancer Grade 3/non-endometrioid cancer) or combined endometrial biopsy and ultrasound (high-risk defined as endometrioid cancer Grade 3/non-endometrioid cancer/deep myometrial invasion/cervical stromal invasion/extrauterine spread). RESULTS Lymphadenectomy was performed in 691 women, of whom 127 had lymph-node metastases. The model for prediction of lymph-node metastases included the predictors age, duration of abnormal bleeding, endometrial biopsy result, tumor extension and tumor size according to ultrasound and undefined tumor with an unmeasurable endometrium. The model's area under the curve was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.68-0.78), the calibration slope was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.79-1.34) and the calibration intercept was 0.06 (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.27). Using a risk threshold for lymph-node metastases of 5% compared with 20%, the model had, respectively, a sensitivity of 98% vs 48% and specificity of 11% vs 80%. The model had higher sensitivity and specificity than did classification as high-risk, according to endometrial biopsy alone (50% vs 35% and 80% vs 77%, respectively) or combined endometrial biopsy and ultrasound (80% vs 75% and 53% vs 52%, respectively). The model's clinical utility was higher than that of endometrial biopsy alone or combined endometrial biopsy and ultrasound at any given risk threshold. CONCLUSIONS Based on endometrial biopsy results and clinical and ultrasound characteristics, the individual risk of lymph-node metastases in women with endometrial cancer can be estimated reliably before surgery. The model is superior to risk classification by endometrial biopsy alone or in combination with ultrasound. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S E Eriksson
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A C Testa
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - D Franchi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - F Frühauf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - L A Haak
- Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - G Opolskiene
- Center of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - F Mascilini
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - C Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - V Chiappa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - T Bourne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P G Lindqvist
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Y Verbakel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - T Van den Bosch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Wynants
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Anfelter P, Testa A, Chiappa V, Froyman W, Fruscio R, Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Mascillini F, Pascual MA, Sibal M, Savelli L, Zannoni GF, Timmerman D, Epstein E. Imaging in gynecological disease (17): ultrasound features of malignant ovarian yolk sac tumors (endodermal sinus tumors). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56:276-284. [PMID: 32119168 DOI: 10.1002/uog.22002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and sonographic characteristics of malignant ovarian yolk sac tumors (YSTs). METHODS In this retrospective multicenter study, we included 21 patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian YST and available transvaginal ultrasound images and/or videoclips and/or a detailed ultrasound report. Ten patients identified from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies had undergone a standardized preoperative ultrasound examination, by an experienced ultrasound examiner, between 1999 and 2016. A further 11 patients were identified through medical files, for whom ultrasound images were retrieved from local image workstations and picture archiving and communication systems. All tumors were described using IOTA terminology. The collected ultrasound images and videoclips were used by two observers for additional characterization of the tumors. RESULTS All cases were pure YSTs, except for one that was a mixed tumor (80% YST and 20% embryonal carcinoma). Median age at diagnosis was 25 (interquartile range (IQR), 19.5-30.5) years. Seventy-six percent (16/21) of women had an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage I-II tumor at diagnosis. Fifty-eight percent (11/19) of women felt pain during the ultrasound examination and one presented with ovarian torsion. Median serum α-fetoprotein (S-AFP) level was 4755 (IQR, 1071-25 303) µg/L and median serum CA 125 level was 126 (IQR, 35-227) kU/L. On ultrasound assessment, 95% (20/21) of tumors were unilateral. The median maximum tumor diameter was 157 (IQR, 107-181) mm and the largest solid component was 110 (IQR, 66-159) mm. Tumors were classified as either multilocular-solid (10/21; 48%) or solid (11/21; 52%). Papillary projections were found in 10% (2/21) of cases. Most (20/21; 95%) tumors were well vascularized (color score, 3-4) and none had acoustic shadowing. Malignancy was suspected in all cases, except in the patient with ovarian torsion, who presented a tumor with a color score of 1, which was classified as probably benign. Image and videoclip quality was considered as adequate in 18/21 cases. On review of the images and videoclips, we found that all tumors contained both solid components and cystic spaces, and that 89% (16/18) had irregular, still fine-textured and slightly hyperechoic solid tissue, giving them a characteristic appearance. CONCLUSION Malignant ovarian YSTs are often detected at an early stage, in young women usually in the second or third decade of life, presenting with pain and markedly elevated S-AFP. On ultrasound, malignant ovarian YSTs are mostly unilateral, large and multilocular-solid or solid, with fine-textured slightly hyperechoic solid tissue and rich vascularization. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Anfelter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Testa
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - V Chiappa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - F Mascillini
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproduction, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Sibal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - L Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - G F Zannoni
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ludwin A, Coelho Neto MA, Ludwin I, Nastri CO, Costa W, Acién M, Alcazar JL, Benacerraf B, Condous G, DeCherney A, De Wilde RL, Diamond MP, Emanuel MH, Guerriero S, Hurd W, Levine D, Lindheim S, Pellicer A, Petraglia F, Saridogan E, Martins WP. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): diagnostic criteria for T-shaped uterus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55:815-829. [PMID: 31432589 DOI: 10.1002/uog.20845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify uterine measurements that are reliable and accurate to distinguish between T-shaped and normal/arcuate uterus, and define T-shaped uterus, using Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME) methodology, which uses as reference standard the decision made most often by several independent experts. METHODS This was a prospectively planned multirater reliability/agreement and diagnostic accuracy study, performed between November 2017 and December 2018, using a sample of 100 three-dimensional (3D) datasets of different uteri with lateral uterine cavity indentations, acquired from consecutive women between 2014 and 2016. Fifteen representative experts (five clinicians, five surgeons and five sonologists), blinded to each others' opinions, examined anonymized images of the coronal plane of each uterus and provided their independent opinion as to whether it was T-shaped or normal/arcuate; this formed the basis of the CUME reference standard, with the decision made most often (i.e. that chosen by eight or more of the 15 experts) for each uterus being considered the correct diagnosis for that uterus. Two other experienced observers, also blinded to the opinions of the other experts, then performed independently 15 sonographic measurements, using the original 3D datasets of each uterus. Agreement between the diagnoses made by the 15 experts was assessed using kappa and percent agreement. The interobserver reliability of measurements was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The diagnostic test accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) and the best cut-off value was assessed by calculating Youden's index, according to the CUME reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive likelihood ratios (LR- and LR+) and post-test probability were calculated. RESULTS According to the CUME reference standard, there were 20 T-shaped and 80 normal/arcuate uteri. Individual experts recognized between 5 and 35 (median, 19) T-shaped uteri on subjective judgment. The agreement among experts was 82% (kappa = 0.43). Three of the 15 sonographic measurements were identified as having good diagnostic test accuracy, according to the CUME reference standard: lateral indentation angle (AUC = 0.95), lateral internal indentation depth (AUC = 0.92) and T-angle (AUC = 0.87). Of these, T-angle had the best interobserver reproducibility (CCC = 0.87 vs 0.82 vs 0.62 for T-angle vs lateral indentation depth vs lateral indentation angle). The best cut-off values for these measurements were: lateral indentation angle ≤ 130° (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 96%; LR+, 21.3; LR-, 0.21), lateral indentation depth ≥ 7 mm (sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 77.5%; LR+, 4.2; LR-, 0.06) and T-angle ≤ 40° (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 87.5%; LR+, 6.4; LR-, 0.23). Most of the experts diagnosed the uterus as being T-shaped in 0% (0/56) of cases when none of these three criteria was met, in 10% (2/20) of cases when only one criterion was met, in 50% (5/10) of cases when two of the three criteria were met, and in 93% (13/14) of cases when all three criteria were met. CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis of T-shaped uterus is not easy; the agreement among experts was only moderate and the judgement of individual experts was commonly insufficient for accurate diagnosis. The three sonographic measurements with cut-offs that we identified (lateral internal indentation depth ≥ 7 mm, lateral indentation angle ≤ 130° and T-angle ≤ 40°) had good diagnostic test accuracy and fair-to-moderate reliability and, when applied in combination, they provided high post-test probability for T-shaped uterus. In the absence of other anomalies, we suggest considering a uterus to be normal when none or only one criterion is met, borderline when two criteria are met, and T-shaped when all three criteria are met. These three CUME criteria for defining T-shaped uterus may aid in determination of its prevalence, clinical implications and best management and in the assessment of post-surgical morphologic outcome. The CUME definition of T-shaped uterus may help in the development of interventional randomized controlled trials and observational studies and in the diagnosis of uterine morphology in everyday practice, and could be adopted by guidelines on uterine anomalies to enrich their classification systems. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ludwin
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
- Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology, Private Medical Center, Krakow, Poland
| | - M A Coelho Neto
- SEMEAR Fertilidade, Reproductive Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (DGO-FRMP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - I Ludwin
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
- Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology, Private Medical Center, Krakow, Poland
| | - C O Nastri
- SEMEAR Fertilidade, Reproductive Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - W Costa
- SEMEAR Fertilidade, Reproductive Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (DGO-FRMP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - M Acién
- San Juan University Hospital/Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A DeCherney
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - R-L De Wilde
- Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - M P Diamond
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - M H Emanuel
- Department of Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - W Hurd
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - D Levine
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S Lindheim
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA
| | - A Pellicer
- Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - E Saridogan
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - W P Martins
- SEMEAR Fertilidade, Reproductive Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (DGO-FRMP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Pascual MA, Rodriguez I, Piras A, Perniciano M, Saba L, Paoletti AM, Mais V, Alcazar JL. Ultrasonographic soft markers for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55:269-273. [PMID: 30977185 DOI: 10.1002/uog.20289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ultrasound (US) soft markers as a first-line imaging tool to raise suspicion of rectosigmoid (RS) involvement in women suspected of having deep endometriosis. METHODS We included in this prospective observational study all patients with clinical suspicion of deep endometriosis who underwent diagnostic transvaginal US evaluation at our unit from January 2016 to February 2017. Several US soft markers were evaluated for prediction of RS involvement (presence of US signs of uterine adenomyosis, presence of an endometrioma, adhesion of the ovary to the uterus (reduced ovarian mobility), presence of 'kissing ovaries' (KO) and absence of the 'sliding sign'), using as the gold standard expert US examination for the presence of RS endometriosis. RESULTS Included were 333 patients with clinical suspicion of deep endometriosis. Of these, 106 had an US diagnosis of RS endometriosis by an expert. The only significant variables found in the prediction model were absence of the sliding sign (odds ratio (OR), 13.95; 95% CI, 7.7-25.3), presence of KO (OR, 22.5; 95% CI, 4.1-124.0) and the interaction between these two variables (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.004-0.28). Regarding their interaction, RS endometriosis was present when KO was absent and the sliding sign was present in 10% (19/190) of cases, when both KO and the sliding sign were present in 71.4% (5/7) of cases, when both KO and the sliding sign were absent in 60.8% (76/125) of cases and when KO was present and the sliding sign was absent in 54.5% (6/11) of cases. Thus, when the sliding sign was absent and/or KO was present, transvaginal US showed a specificity of 75% (95% CI, 69-80%) and a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI, 73-88%). CONCLUSIONS US findings of absence of the sliding sign and/or presence of KO in patients with clinical suspicion of endometriosis should raise suspicion of RS involvement and indicate referral for expert US examination, with a low rate of false-negative diagnosis. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Italy
| | - S Ajossa
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Rodriguez
- Unidad Epidemiología y Estadística, Departamento de Obstetricia, Ginecología y Reproducción, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Piras
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - M Perniciano
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - L Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
| | - A M Paoletti
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - V Mais
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Verbakel JY, Mascilini F, Wynants L, Fischerova D, Testa AC, Franchi D, Frühauf F, Cibula D, Lindqvist PG, Fruscio R, Haak LA, Opolskiene G, Alcazar JL, Mais V, Carlson JW, Sladkevicius P, Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bosch TVD, Epstein E. Validation of ultrasound strategies to assess tumor extension and to predict high-risk endometrial cancer in women from the prospective IETA (International Endometrial Tumor Analysis)-4 cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55:115-124. [PMID: 31225683 DOI: 10.1002/uog.20374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the performance of ultrasound measurements and subjective ultrasound assessment (SA) in detecting deep myometrial invasion (MI) and cervical stromal invasion (CSI) in women with endometrial cancer, overall and according to whether they had low- or high-grade disease separately, and to validate published measurement cut-offs and prediction models to identify MI, CSI and high-risk disease (Grade-3 endometrioid or non-endometrioid cancer and/or deep MI and/or CSI). METHODS The study comprised 1538 patients with endometrial cancer from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA)-4 prospective multicenter study, who underwent standardized expert transvaginal ultrasound examination. SA and ultrasound measurements were used to predict deep MI and CSI. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the tumor/uterine anteroposterior (AP) diameter ratio for detecting deep MI and that of the distance from the lower margin of the tumor to the outer cervical os (Dist-OCO) for detecting CSI. We also validated two two-step strategies for the prediction of high-risk cancer; in the first step, biopsy-confirmed Grade-3 endometrioid or mucinous or non-endometrioid cancers were classified as high-risk cancer, while the second step encompassed the application of a mathematical model to classify the remaining tumors. The 'subjective prediction model' included biopsy grade (Grade 1 vs Grade 2) and subjective assessment of deep MI or CSI (presence or absence) as variables, while the 'objective prediction model' included biopsy grade (Grade 1 vs Grade 2) and minimal tumor-free margin. The predictive performance of the two two-step strategies was compared with that of simply classifying patients as high risk if either deep MI or CSI was suspected based on SA or if biopsy showed Grade-3 endometrioid or mucinous or non-endometrioid histotype (i.e. combining SA with biopsy grade). Histological assessment from hysterectomy was considered the reference standard. RESULTS In 1275 patients with measurable lesions, the sensitivity and specificity of SA for detecting deep MI was 70% and 80%, respectively, in patients with a Grade-1 or -2 endometrioid or mucinous tumor vs 76% and 64% in patients with a Grade-3 endometrioid or mucinous or a non-endometrioid tumor. The corresponding values for the detection of CSI were 51% and 94% vs 50% and 91%. Tumor AP diameter and tumor/uterine AP diameter ratio showed the best performance for predicting deep MI (area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.76 and 0.77, respectively), and Dist-OCO had the best performance for predicting CSI (AUC, 0.72). The proportion of patients classified correctly as having high-risk cancer was 80% when simply combining SA with biopsy grade vs 80% and 74% when using the subjective and objective two-step strategies, respectively. The subjective and objective models had an AUC of 0.76 and 0.75, respectively, when applied to Grade-1 and -2 endometrioid tumors. CONCLUSIONS In the hands of experienced ultrasound examiners, SA was superior to ultrasound measurements for the prediction of deep MI and CSI of endometrial cancer, especially in patients with a Grade-1 or -2 tumor. The mathematical models for the prediction of high-risk cancer performed as expected. The best strategies for predicting high-risk endometrial cancer were combining SA with biopsy grade and the subjective two-step strategy, both having an accuracy of 80%. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Verbakel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - F Mascilini
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli-IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - L Wynants
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A C Testa
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rome, Italy
| | - D Franchi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - F Frühauf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P G Lindqvist
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - L A Haak
- Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - G Opolskiene
- Center of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius University, Lithuania
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - V Mais
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J W Carlson
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
| | - T Van Den Bosch
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ludovisi M, Moro F, Pasciuto T, Di Noi S, Giunchi S, Savelli L, Pascual MA, Sladkevicius P, Alcazar JL, Franchi D, Mancari R, Moruzzi MC, Jurkovic D, Chiappa V, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Epstein E, Frühauf F, Fischerova D, Fruscio R, Ciccarone F, Zannoni GF, Scambia G, Valentin L, Testa AC. Imaging in gynecological disease (15): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of uterine sarcoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54:676-687. [PMID: 30908820 DOI: 10.1002/uog.20270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of uterine sarcomas. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study. From the databases of 13 ultrasound centers, we identified patients with a histological diagnosis of uterine sarcoma with available ultrasound reports and ultrasound images who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination between 1996 and 2016. As the first step, each author collected information from the original ultrasound reports from his/her own center on predefined ultrasound features of the tumors and by reviewing the ultrasound images to identify information on variables not described in the original report. As the second step, 16 ultrasound examiners reviewed the images electronically in a consensus meeting and described them using predetermined terminology. RESULTS We identified 116 patients with leiomyosarcoma, 48 with endometrial stromal sarcoma and 31 with undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. Median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 26-86 years). Most patients were symptomatic at diagnosis (164/183 (89.6%)), the most frequent presenting symptom being abnormal vaginal bleeding (91/183 (49.7%)). Patients with endometrial stromal sarcoma were younger than those with leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (median age, 46 years vs 57 and 60 years, respectively). According to the assessment by the original ultrasound examiners, the median diameter of the largest tumor was 91 mm (range, 7-321 mm). Visible normal myometrium was reported in 149/195 (76.4%) cases, and 80.0% (156/195) of lesions were solitary. Most sarcomas (155/195 (79.5%)) were solid masses (> 80% solid tissue), and most manifested inhomogeneous echogenicity of the solid tissue (151/195 (77.4%)); one sarcoma was multilocular without solid components. Cystic areas were described in 87/195 (44.6%) tumors and most cyst cavities had irregular walls (67/87 (77.0%)). Internal shadowing was observed in 42/192 (21.9%) sarcomas and fan-shaped shadowing in 4/192 (2.1%). Moderate or rich vascularization was found on color-Doppler examination in 127/187 (67.9%) cases. In 153/195 (78.5%) sarcomas, the original ultrasound examiner suspected malignancy. Though there were some differences, the results of the first and second steps of the analysis were broadly similar. CONCLUSIONS Uterine sarcomas typically appear as solid masses with inhomogeneous echogenicity, sometimes with irregular cystic areas but only very occasionally with fan-shaped shadowing. Most are moderately or very well vascularized. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ludovisi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - T Pasciuto
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - S Di Noi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - S Giunchi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - L Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - D Franchi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Division of Gynecology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Mancari
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Division of Gynecology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M C Moruzzi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - D Jurkovic
- Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - V Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, University of Cagliary, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - C Exacoustos
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Frühauf
- Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D Fischerova
- Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano - Bicocca, Department of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - F Ciccarone
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G F Zannoni
- Institute of Histopathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Institution of Clinical Sciences Malmoe, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - A C Testa
- Instituto di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guerriero S, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Rodriguez I, Zajicek M, Rolla M, Rams Llop N, Yulzari V, Bardin R, Buonomo F, Comparetto O, Perniciano M, Saba L, Mais V, Alcazar JL. Learning curve for ultrasonographic diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis using structured offline training program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54:262-269. [PMID: 30426587 DOI: 10.1002/uog.20176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the learning curves of trainees during a structured offline/hands-on training program for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS Four trainees (all Ob/Gyn postgraduates with at least 5 years' experience in ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology, but with no experience of sonographic examination of DIE) participated in the study. They underwent a 2-week training program with a single trainer. Day 1 was devoted to theoretical issues and guided offline analysis of 10 three-dimensional ultrasound volumes. During the following days, four sessions of real-time sonographic examinations were performed in a DIE referral center ultrasound unit. In between these sessions, the trainees analyzed four datasets offline, each containing 25 volumes. At the end of each set, misinterpreted volumes were reassessed with the trainer. Presence or absence of DIE at surgery was considered the gold standard. The trainees' learning process was evaluated by learning-curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) and the deviations of the trainees' level of performance at the control stage was assessed by CUSUM (standard CUSUM), for different locations of DIE. RESULTS The trainees reached competence after an average of 17 (range, 14-21) evaluations for bladder, 40 (range, 30-60) for rectosigmoid, 25 (range, 14-34) for forniceal, 44 (range, 25-66) for uterosacral ligament (USL) and 21 (range, 14-43) for rectovaginal septum (RVS) locations of DIE, and then kept the process under control, with error levels of less than 4.5% until the end of the test. The overall accuracy for each trainee in diagnosis of DIE at the different locations ranged from 0.91 to 0.98 for bladder DIE, from 0.80 to 0.94 for rectosigmoid DIE, from 0.90 to 0.94 for forniceal DIE, from 0.79 to 0.82 for USL DIE and from 0.89 to 0.98 for RVS DIE. CONCLUSIONS The suggested 2-week training program, based on a mixture of offline and live scanning sessions, is feasible and apparently provides effective training for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of DIE. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Ajossa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - I Rodriguez
- Unidad Epidemiología y Estadística, Departamento de Obstetricia, Ginecología y Reproducción, Hospital Universitario Quirón Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Zajicek
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Unit at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel affiliated to Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - M Rolla
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - N Rams Llop
- Secció d'Ecografia Servei de Ginecologia i Obstetricia Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Yulzari
- Ob/Gyn Ultrasonic Imaging Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - R Bardin
- Hellen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - F Buonomo
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - O Comparetto
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - M Perniciano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - L Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - V Mais
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Epstein E, Fischerova D, Valentin L, Testa AC, Franchi D, Sladkevicius P, Frühauf F, Lindqvist PG, Mascilini F, Fruscio R, Haak LA, Opolskiene G, Pascual MA, Alcazar JL, Chiappa V, Guerriero S, Carlson JW, Van Holsbeke C, Leone FPG, De Moor B, Bourne T, van Calster B, Installe A, Timmerman D, Verbakel JY, Van den Bosch T. Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer as defined by International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) consensus nomenclature: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 51:818-828. [PMID: 28944985 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the sonographic features of endometrial cancer in relation to tumor stage, grade and histological type, using the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology. METHODS This was a prospective multicenter study of 1714 women with biopsy-confirmed endometrial cancer undergoing standardized transvaginal grayscale and Doppler ultrasound examination according to the IETA study protocol, by experienced ultrasound examiners using high-end ultrasound equipment. Clinical and sonographic data were entered into a web-based database. We assessed how strongly sonographic characteristics, according to IETA, were associated with outcome at hysterectomy, i.e. tumor stage, grade and histological type, using univariable logistic regression and the c-statistic. RESULTS In total, 1538 women were included in the final analysis. Median age was 65 (range, 27-98) years, median body mass index was 28.4 (range 16-67) kg/m2 , 1377 (89.5%) women were postmenopausal and 1296 (84.3%) reported abnormal vaginal bleeding. Grayscale and color Doppler features varied according to grade and stage of tumor. High-risk tumors, compared with low-risk tumors, were less likely to have regular endometrial-myometrial junction (difference of -23%; 95% CI, -27 to -18%), were larger (mean endometrial thickness; difference of +9%; 95% CI, +8 to +11%), and were more likely to have non-uniform echogenicity (difference of +7%; 95% CI, +1 to +13%), a multiple, multifocal vessel pattern (difference of +21%; 95% CI, +16 to +26%) and a moderate or high color score (difference of +22%; 95% CI, +18 to +27%). CONCLUSION Grayscale and color Doppler sonographic features are associated with grade and stage of tumor, and differ between high- and low-risk endometrial cancer. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
| | - A C Testa
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - D Franchi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
| | - F Frühauf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P G Lindqvist
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Mascilini
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - L A Haak
- Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - G Opolskiene
- Center of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vilnius University Hospital, Santariskiu Clinic, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproduction, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - V Chiappa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J W Carlson
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - F P G Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences Institute, L. Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - B De Moor
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT-SCD, STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analysis, KU Leuven, and imec, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Bourne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - B van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Installe
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT-SCD, STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analysis, KU Leuven, and imec, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Y Verbakel
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - T Van den Bosch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Guerriero S, Saba L, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Rodriguez I, Mais V, Alcazar JL. Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 51:586-595. [PMID: 29154402 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of studies comparing the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) including only studies in which patients underwent both techniques. METHODS An extensive search was carried out in PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science for papers from January 1989 to October 2016 comparing TVS and MRI in DIE. Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they reported on the use of TVS and MRI in the same set of patients for the preoperative detection of endometriosis in pelvic locations in women with clinical suspicion of DIE and using surgical data as a reference standard. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A random-effects model was used to determine pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). RESULTS Of 375 citations identified, six studies (n = 424) were considered eligible. For MRI in the detection of DIE in the rectosigmoid, pooled sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.83-0.99), LR+ was 18.4 (95% CI, 4.7-72.4), LR- was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.24) and DOR was 116 (95% CI, 23-585). For TVS in the detection of DIE in the rectosigmoid, pooled sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.68-0.94), specificity was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85-0.99), LR+ was 20.4 (95% CI, 4.7-88.5), LR- was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.38) and DOR was 127 (95% CI, 14-1126). For MRI in the detection of DIE in the rectovaginal septum, pooled sensitivity was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51-0.79), specificity was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99), LR+ was 22.5 (95% CI, 6.7-76.2), LR- was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.23-0.52) and DOR was 65 (95% CI, 21-204). For TVS in the detection of DIE in the rectovaginal septum, pooled sensitivity was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.26-0.86), specificity was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), LR+ was 23.5 (95% CI, 9.1-60.5), LR- was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.18-0.97) and DOR was 56 (95% CI, 11-275). For MRI in the detection of DIE in the uterosacral ligaments, pooled sensitivity was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.55-0.82), specificity was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97), LR+ was 10.4 (95% CI, 5.1-21.2), LR- was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.20-0.51) and DOR was 32 (95% CI, 12-85). For TVS in the detection of DIE in the uterosacral ligaments, pooled sensitivity was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.77), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.73-0.93), LR+ was 4.8 (95% CI, 2.6-9.0), LR- was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.29-0.50) and DOR was 12 (95% CI, 7-24). Confidence intervals of pooled sensitivities, specificities and DOR were wide for both techniques in all the locations considered. Heterogeneity was moderate or high for sensitivity and specificity for both TVS and MRI in most locations assessed. According to QUADAS-2, the quality of the included studies was considered good for most domains. CONCLUSION The diagnostic performance of TVS and MRI is similar for detecting DIE involving rectosigmoid, uterosacral ligaments and rectovaginal septum. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - L Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Monserrato, Italy
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Ajossa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - I Rodriguez
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Mais
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ludwin A, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Ludwin I, Coelho Neto MA, Leitão VM, Acién M, Alcazar JL, Benacerraf B, Condous G, De Wilde RL, Emanuel MH, Gibbons W, Guerriero S, Hurd WW, Levine D, Lindheim S, Pellicer A, Petraglia F, Saridogan E. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 51:101-109. [PMID: 29024135 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Revised: 08/26/2017] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the level of agreement between experts in distinguishing between septate and normal/arcuate uterus using their subjective judgment when reviewing the coronal view of the uterus from three-dimensional ultrasound. Another aim was to determine the interobserver reliability and diagnostic test accuracy of three measurements suggested by recent guidelines, using as reference standard the decision made most often by experts (Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME)). METHODS Images of the coronal plane of the uterus from 100 women with suspected fundal internal indentation were anonymized and provided to 15 experts (five clinicians, five surgeons and five sonologists). They were instructed to indicate whether they believed the uterus to be normal/arcuate (defined as normal uterine morphology or not clinically relevant degree of distortion caused by internal indentation) or septate (clinically relevant degree of distortion caused by internal indentation). Two other observers independently measured indentation depth, indentation angle and indentation-to-wall-thickness (I:WT) ratio. The agreement between experts was assessed using kappa, the interobserver reliability was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), the diagnostic test accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) and the best cut-off value was assessed using Youden's index, considering as the reference standard the choice made most often by the experts (CUME). RESULTS There was good agreement between all experts (kappa, 0.62). There were 18 septate and 82 normal/arcuate uteri according to CUME; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)-European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) criteria (I:WT ratio > 50%) defined 80 septate and 20 normal/arcuate uteri, while American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) criteria defined five septate (depth > 15 mm and angle < 90°), 82 normal/arcuate (depth < 10 mm and angle > 90°) and 13 uteri that could not be classified (referred to as the gray-zone). The agreement between ESHRE-ESGE and CUME was 38% (kappa, 0.1); the agreement between ASRM criteria and CUME for septate was 87% (kappa, 0.39), and considering both septate and gray-zone as septate, the agreement was 98% (kappa, 0.93). Among the three measurements, the interobserver reproducibility of indentation depth (CCC, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99) was better than both indentation angle (CCC, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97) and I:WT ratio (CCC, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94). The diagnostic test accuracy of these three measurements using CUME as reference standard was very good, with AUC between 0.96 and 1.00. The best cut-off values for these measurements to define septate uterus were: indentation depth ≥ 10 mm, indentation angle < 140° and I:WT ratio > 110% . CONCLUSIONS The suggested ESHRE-ESGE cut-off value overestimates the prevalence of septate uterus while that of ASRM underestimates this prevalence, leaving in the gray-zone most of the uteri that experts considered as septate. We recommend considering indentation depth ≥ 10 mm as septate, since the measurement is simple and reliable and this criterion is in agreement with expert opinion. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ludwin
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
- Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology, Private Medical Center, Krakow, Poland
| | - W P Martins
- SEMEAR Fertilidade, Reproductive Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (DGO-FRMP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - C O Nastri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (DGO-FRMP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - I Ludwin
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
- Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology, Private Medical Center, Krakow, Poland
| | - M A Coelho Neto
- SEMEAR Fertilidade, Reproductive Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - V M Leitão
- SEMEAR Fertilidade, Reproductive Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - M Acién
- San Juan University Hospital/Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - G Condous
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - R-L De Wilde
- Carl-von-Ossietzky-University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - M H Emanuel
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - W Gibbons
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - W W Hurd
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - D Levine
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S Lindheim
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA
| | - A Pellicer
- Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - E Saridogan
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Coelho Neto MA, Ludwin A, Borrell A, Benacerraf B, Dewailly D, da Silva Costa F, Condous G, Alcazar JL, Jokubkiene L, Guerriero S, Van den Bosch T, Martins WP. Counting ovarian antral follicles by ultrasound: a practical guide. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 51:10-20. [PMID: 29080259 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Revised: 09/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
This Consensus Opinion summarizes the main aspects of several techniques for performing ovarian antral follicle count (AFC), proposes a standardized report and provides recommendations for future research. AFC should be performed using a transvaginal ultrasound (US) probe with frequency ≥ 7 MHz. For training, we suggest a minimum of 20-40 supervised examinations. The operator should be able to adjust the machine settings in order to achieve the best contrast between follicular fluid and ovarian stroma. AFC may be evaluated using real-time two-dimensional (2D) US, stored 2D-US cine-loops and stored three-dimensional (3D) US datasets. Real-time 2D-US has the advantage of permitting additional maneuvers to determine whether an anechoic structure is a follicle, but may require a longer scanning time, particularly when there is a large number of follicles, resulting in more discomfort to the patient. 2D-US cine-loops have the advantages of reduced scanning time and the possibility for other observers to perform the count. The 3D-US technique requires US machines with 3D capability and the operators to receive additional training for acquisition/analysis, but has the same advantages as cine-loop and also allows application of different imaging techniques, such as volume contrast imaging, inversion mode and semi-automated techniques such as sonography-based automated volume calculation. In this Consensus Opinion, we make certain recommendations based on the available evidence. However, there is no strong evidence that any one method is better than another; the operator should choose the best method for counting ovarian follicles based on availability of resources and on their own preference and skill. More studies evaluating how to improve the reliability of AFC should be encouraged. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Coelho Neto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A Ludwin
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - A Borrell
- BCNatal, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - B Benacerraf
- Department of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - D Dewailly
- CHU Lille, Department of Endocrine Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France
| | - F da Silva Costa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University and Monash Ultrasound for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney; and Nepean Hospital, Penrith, Australia
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - L Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden
| | - S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - T Van den Bosch
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W P Martins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- SEMEAR Fertilidade, Reproductive Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T, Valentin L, Leone FPG, Van Schoubroeck D, Exacoustos C, Installé AJF, Martins WP, Abrao MS, Hudelist G, Bazot M, Alcazar JL, Gonçalves MO, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Savelli L, Dunham R, Reid S, Menakaya U, Bourne T, Ferrero S, Leon M, Bignardi T, Holland T, Jurkovic D, Benacerraf B, Osuga Y, Somigliana E, Timmerman D. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48:318-332. [PMID: 27349699 DOI: 10.1002/uog.15955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 405] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Revised: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The IDEA (International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group) statement is a consensus opinion on terms, definitions and measurements that may be used to describe the sonographic features of the different phenotypes of endometriosis. Currently, it is difficult to compare results between published studies because authors use different terms when describing the same structures and anatomical locations. We hope that the terms and definitions suggested herein will be adopted in centers around the world. This would result in consistent use of nomenclature when describing the ultrasound location and extent of endometriosis. We believe that the standardization of terminology will allow meaningful comparisons between future studies in women with an ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and should facilitate multicenter research. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - T van den Bosch
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tienen Regional Hospital, Tienen, Belgium
| | - L Valentin
- Lund University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - F P G Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - D Van Schoubroeck
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tienen Regional Hospital, Tienen, Belgium
| | - C Exacoustos
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy and Ospedale Generale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebene Fratelli, Rome, Italy
| | - A J F Installé
- KU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS, Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Leuven, Belgium and iMinds Medical IT, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W P Martins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - M S Abrao
- Endometriosis Division, Obstetrics and Gynecological Department, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - G Hudelist
- Hospital St John of God Johannes, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Bazot
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M O Gonçalves
- Clinica Medicina da Mulher and RDO Medicina Diagnóstica, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Ajossa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - L Savelli
- Gynecology and Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Unit, S. Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Dunham
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - S Reid
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - U Menakaya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Calvary Public Hospital & JUNIC Specialist Imaging & Women's Center, Canberra, Australia
| | - T Bourne
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - S Ferrero
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS AOU San Martino - IST, Genova, Italy and Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - M Leon
- Ultrasound Unit, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Clinica Indisa, Santiago, Chile
| | - T Bignardi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda, Ospedaliera Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy
| | - T Holland
- Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Jurkovic
- Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - B Benacerraf
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Y Osuga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - E Somigliana
- Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - D Timmerman
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tienen Regional Hospital, Tienen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Minguez JA, Jurado M, Mais V, Melis GB, Alcazar JL. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in uterosacral ligaments, rectovaginal septum, vagina and bladder: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46:534-545. [PMID: 26250349 DOI: 10.1002/uog.15667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Revised: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) in the preoperative detection of endometriosis in the uterosacral ligaments (USL), rectovaginal septum (RVS), vagina and bladder in patients with clinical suspicion of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS An extensive search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE for studies published between January 1989 and December 2014. Studies were considered eligible if they reported on the use of TVS for the preoperative detection of endometriosis in the USL, RVS, vagina and bladder in women with clinical suspicion of DIE using the surgical data as a reference standard. Study quality was assessed using the PRISMA guidelines and QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS Of the 801 citations identified, 11 studies (n = 1583) were considered eligible and were included in the meta-analysis. For detection of endometriosis in the USL, the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of TVS were 53% (95%CI, 35-70%) and 93% (95%CI, 83-97%), respectively. The pretest probability of USL endometriosis was 54%, which increased to 90% when suspicion of endometriosis was present after TVS examination. For detection of endometriosis in the RVS, the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 49% (95%CI, 36-62%) and 98% (95%CI, 95-99%), respectively. The pretest probability of RVS endometriosis was 24%, which increased to 89% when suspicion of endometriosis was present after TVS examination. For detection of vaginal endometriosis, the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 58% (95%CI, 40-74%) and 96% (95%CI, 87-99%), respectively. The pretest probability of vaginal endometriosis was 17%, which increased to 76% when suspicion of endometriosis was present after TVS assessment. Substantial heterogeneity was found for sensitivity and specificity for all these locations. For detection of bladder endometriosis, the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 62% (95%CI, 40-80%) and 100% (95%CI, 97-100%), respectively. Moderate heterogeneity was found for sensitivity and specificity for bladder endometriosis. The pretest probability of bladder endometriosis was 5%, which increased to 92% when suspicion of endometriosis was present after TVS assessment. CONCLUSION Overall diagnostic performance of TVS for detecting DIE in uterosacral ligaments, rectovaginal septum, vagina and bladder is fair with high specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - S Ajossa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J A Minguez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M Jurado
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - V Mais
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - G B Melis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
León M, Alcazar JL. High sliding sign: a new soft marker of uterine fundus compromise in deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45:624. [PMID: 25417925 DOI: 10.1002/uog.14731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2014] [Accepted: 11/12/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M León
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ultrasound Unit, Clínica Indisa, Santiago, Chile
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alcazar JL. Re: Office gel sonovaginography for the prediction of posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis: a multicenter prospective observational study. S. Reid, C. Lu, N. Hardy, I. Casikar, G. Reid, G. Cario, D. Chou, D. Almashat and G. Condous. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 710-718. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44:632. [PMID: 25449116 DOI: 10.1002/uog.14704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Guerriero S, Saba L, Ajossa S, Peddes C, Angiolucci M, Perniciano M, Melis GB, Alcazar JL. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1189-98. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
23
|
Alcazar JL. Re: Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of assessment of Doppler ultrasound findings in adnexal masses. L. Zannoni , L. Savelli , L. Jokubkiene , A. Di Legge , G. Condous , A. C. Testa , P. Sladkevicius and L. Valentin . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 93-101. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:4-5. [PMID: 23798548 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Navarra, Clinicia Universitaria de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, Pamplona, Navarra 31008, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guerriero S, Saba L, Alcazar JL. Reply: To PMID 22915525. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41:597. [PMID: 23610038 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
|
25
|
Guerriero S, Pilloni M, Alcazar JL, Sedda F, Ajossa S, Mais V, Melis GB, Saba L. Tissue characterization using mean gray value analysis in deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41:459-464. [PMID: 22915525 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate differences in tissue characterization using three-dimensional sonographic mean gray value (MGV) between retrocervical and rectosigmoid deeply infiltrating endometriosis, and to assess intra- and interobserver concordance in MGV quantification. METHODS In this retrospective study, stored ultrasound volumes from 50 premenopausal women (mean age, 32 years) with 57 histologically confirmed nodules of deep endometriosis were retrieved from our database for analysis. A single experienced operator had acquired all volumes. For each nodule, the MGV was evaluated using virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) software with semiautomated sphere-sampling (1 cm3) from the central part of the nodule. In these patients the MGV was also quantified from the myometrium of the fundal part of the uterus. In addition, two observers calculated the MGV in a subset of 24 volumes in order to quantify inter- and intraobserver agreement using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS Mean MGV was significantly higher in rectosigmoid nodules (n = 34) than in nodules with a retrocervical location (n = 23) (23.863 vs. 17.705; P < 0.001). MGV of the myometrium was significantly higher in comparison with that of nodules in both locations (P < 0.001 for both). Intra- and interobserver measurement reproducibility was excellent (ICC > 0.95). CONCLUSIONS Retrocervical and rectosigmoid endometriotic nodules display significantly different MGVs. Measurement of MGV is highly reproducible and its clinical value in the diagnosis and assessment of distribution of deep endometriosis should be assessed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Olartecoechea B, Hereter L. Preoperative diagnosis of metastatic ovarian cancer is related to origin of primary tumor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:581-586. [PMID: 21998039 DOI: 10.1002/uog.10120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound features as well as some clinical and biochemical features of metastatic ovarian tumors according to the origin of the primary tumor in a large study population, METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of 116 masses in 92 patients (mean age, 51 years) evaluated and treated at three European university centers for a metastatic tumor in the ovary. All patients had undergone transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound according to a standardized protocol prior to surgery and tumor removal. Ultrasound features analyzed were bilaterality, tumor volume, morphologic gray-scale appearance and color score. CA 125 was also recorded. RESULTS Primary tumor histological diagnosis was as follows: colon-sigmoid (n = 32), stomach (n = 28), breast (n = 20), uterus (n = 17), lymphoma (n = 4), liver-pancreas-biliary tract (n = 4) and miscellaneous (n = 11). There were no differences in age, menopausal status or CA 125 values according to origin of primary tumor. Bilaterality was significantly more frequent in stomach metastases (56%) in comparison with colon-sigmoid and liver-pancreas-biliary tract metastases (18.5% and 0%, respectively, P < 0.05). Median tumor volume was significantly lower in breast metastases (33.5 mL) compared with other metastases (P < 0.05) except stomach metastases and metastatic tumors from the miscellaneous group. Ovarian metastases from breast cancers were significantly more frequently solid in comparison to stomach, colorectal and uterine cancer metastases (95.0% vs. 60.8%, 46.8% and 70.6%, respectively, P < 0.05), and tended to appear moderately or highly vascularized. There were no differences in color score among all groups, although the percentage of masses with abundant color was high (50-82%). CONCLUSIONS Ovarian metastases derived from breast cancers tend to be small, solid and vascularized; they seem to be the only ovarian metastases whose primary tumor origin can be suspected by ultrasonography preoperatively. Color score does not seem to help suspect the origin of the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Guerriero S, Testa AC, Timmerman D, Van Holsbeke C, Ajossa S, Fischerova D, Franchi D, Leone FPG, Domali E, Alcazar JL, Parodo G, Mascilini F, Virgilio B, Demidov VN, Lipatenkova J, Valentin L. Imaging of gynecological disease (6): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian dysgerminoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37:596-602. [PMID: 21305635 DOI: 10.1002/uog.8958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2011] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the clinical history and ultrasound findings in patients with ovarian dysgerminoma. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian dysgerminoma who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination. The patients were identified from the databases of 11 ultrasound centers. The tumors were described by the principal investigator at each contributing center on the basis of ultrasound images, ultrasound reports and research protocols (when applicable) using the terms and definitions of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. In addition, three authors reviewed all available electronic ultrasound images (gray-scale images and color/power Doppler images were available for 18 patients and 14 patients, respectively) and described them using subjective evaluation of gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound findings (here called pattern recognition). RESULTS Twenty-one patients with ovarian dysgerminoma were identified (including one woman with bilateral masses). Twenty patients had a primary ovarian dysgerminoma (including the one with bilateral masses) and one patient had a recurrence of dysgerminoma in her retained ovary. One of the 21 patients was pregnant. All tumors except one were pure dysgerminomas, one being a mixed germinal cell tumor with 30% dysgerminoma component. Median age was 20 (range, 16-31) years. Information on clinical symptoms was available for 18 patients. In four patients, the tumor was detected incidentally, whereas 14 patients presented with one or more of the following symptoms: acute pain (n = 4), chronic pain (n = 8), bloating (n = 8), menstrual disorders (n = 5) and infertility problems (n = 1). One (5%) patient had ascites. Using the IOTA terms and definitions, all but one dysgerminoma were moderately (43%) or very well (50%) vascularized solid tumors. One tumor was multilocular-solid. According to pattern recognition, most dysgerminomas were highly vascularized, purely solid tumors with heterogeneous internal echogenicity divided into several lobules, had a smooth and sometimes lobulated contour and were well-defined relative to the surrounding organs. CONCLUSION The ultrasound finding of a highly vascularized, large, solid, lobulated adnexal mass with irregular internal echogenicity in a woman 20-30 years old should raise the suspicion of ovarian dysgerminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jiang Y, Zhao J, Hua M, Zhen X, Yan G, Hu Y, Sun H, Selvaggi L, Zannoni GF, Tagliaferri V, De Cicco S, Vellone VG, Romualdi D, Lanzone A, Guido M, Fassbender A, Vodolazkaia AV, Bossuyt XB, Kyama MK, Meuleman CM, Peeraer KP, Tomassetti CT, D'Hooghe TM, Lumini A, Nanni L, Manna C, Pappalardo S, Melin A, Lundholm C, Malki N, Swahn ML, Sparen P, Bergqvist A, Manna C, Crescenzi F, Farrag A, Sallam HN, Zou L, Ding G, Zhang R, Sheng J, Huang H, von Kleinsorgen C, Wilson T, Thiel-Moder U, Ebert AD, Reinfandt M, Papadopolous T, Melo AS, Rodrigues JK, Dib LA, Andrade AZ, Donabela FC, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA, Tocci A, Royo P, Lucchini C, Ramos P, Alcazar JL, Habara T, Terada S, Yoshioka N, Hayashi N, Haouzi D, Assou S, Monzo C, Anahory T, Dechaud H, De Vos J, Hamamah S, Gonzalez-Ramos R, Rojas C, Rocco J, Poch A, Sovino H, Kohen P, Munoz A, Devoto L, Aygen MA, Atakul T, Oner G, Ozgun MT, Sahin Y, Ozturk F, Li R, Qiao J, Zhylkova I, Feskov A, Feskova I, Somova O, Chumakova N, Bontekoe S, Blake D, Heineman MJ, Williams EC, Johnson NP, Motta A, Colaci D, Horton M, Faut M, Bisioli C, Kopcow L, de Zuniga I, Wiener-Megnazi Z, Khaytov M, Lahav - Baratz S, Shiloh H, Koifman M, Oslander R, Dirnfeld M, Sundqvist J, Andersson KL, Scarselli G, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Lalitkumar PGL, Tokushige N, Markham R, Crossett B, Ahn S, Nelaturi V, Khan A, Fraser IS, Van Vaerenbergh I, Fatemi HM, Blockeel C, Van Lommel L, In't Veld P, Schuit F, Kolibianakis EM, Devroey P, Bourgain C, Sugino N, Tamura I, Lee R, Maekawa R, Gelbaya T, Gordts S, D'Hooghe TN, Gergolet M, Nardo LG, Yu H, Wang H, Huang H, Lee C, Soong Y, Kremenska Y, Masliy Y, Goncharova Y, Kremenskoy M, Veselovskyy V, Zukin V, Sudoma I, Delgado-Rosas F, Gomez R, Tamarit S, Abad A, Simon C, Pellicer A, Racicot M, Dean NL, Antaki R, Menard S, Kadoch IJ, Garcia-Guzman R, Cabrera Romero L, Hernandez J, Palumbo A, Marshall E, Lowry J, Maybin JA, Collins F, Critchley HOD, Saunders PTK, Chaudhury K, Jana SK, Banerjee P, Mukherjee S, Chakravarty BN, Allegra A, Marino A, Lama A, Santoro A, Agueli C, Mazzola S, Volpes A, Delvoux B, de Graaff AA, D'Hooghe TM, Kyama CM, Dunselman GAJ, Romano A, Caccavo D, Pellegrino NM, Totaro I, Panzarino M, Nardelli C, Depalo R, Flores R, Montanana V, Monzo A, Polo P, Garcia-Gimeno T, Cabo A, Rubio JM, Pellicer A, de Graaff AA, Dunselman GAJ, Beets GL, van Lankveld JJ, Kim HY, Lee BS, Cho SH, Choi YS, Seo SK, Lee KE, Yang HI, Abubakirov A, Vacheyshvili T, Krechetova L, Ziganshina M, Demura T, Nazarenko T, Fulop I, Rucz A, Herczegh SZ, Ujvari A, Takacs SZ, Szakonyi T, Lopez - Muniz A, Zamora L, Serra O, Guix C, Lopez-Teijon M, Benadiva C, Alvarez JG, Goudakou M, Karkanaki A, Kalogeraki A, Mataliotakis I, Kalogiannidis I, Prapas I, Hosie M, Thomson KJ, Penny CB, Thomson KJ, Penny C, Hosie MJ, McKinnon B, Klaeser B, Bersinger N, Mueller MD, Horcajadas JA, Martinez-Conejero JA, Montesinos M, Morgan M, Fortuno S, Simon C, Pellicer A, Yi KW, Shin JH, Park HT, Kim T, Kim SH, Hur JY, Chan RWS, Chan YY, Ng EHY, Yeung WSB, Santulli P, Borghese B, Chopin N, Marcellin L, de Ziegler D, Chapron C, Elnashar A, Badawy A, Mosbah A, Tzioras S, Polyzos NP, Messini CI, Papanikolaou EG, Valachis A, Patavoukas E, Mauri D, Badawy A, Messinis IE, Acar N, Hirota Y, Tranguch S, Daikoku T, Burnum KE, Xie H, Kodama A, Osuga Y, Ustunel I, Friedman DB, Caprioli RM, Dey SK, Mitra A, Sahu R, Pal M, Bhattachrayya AK, Bhattachrya J, Ferrero S, Remorgida V, Rollandi GA, Biscaldi E, Cho S, Choi YS, Kim HY, Seo SK, Yang HI, Lee KE, Shin JH, Lee BS, Arena E, Morando A, Remorgida V, Ferrero S, Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Pozlep B, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Valenzano Menada M, Biscaldi E, Remorgida V, Morotti M, Venturini PL, Rollandi GA, Ferrero S, Dimitriadis E, Salamonsen LA, Hannan N, O'Connor O, Rombauts L, Stoikos C, Mahmoudi M, Shaikh A, Mousavifar N, Rastin M, Baharara J, Tabasi N, Takemura Y, Fujimoto A, Osuga Y, Tsutsumi R, Ooi N, Yano T, Taketani Y, Karkanaki A, Goudakou M, Kalogiannidis I, Panagiotidis I, Prapas Y, Zhang D, Lv PP, Ding GL, Zhang RJ, Zou LB, Xu GF, Gao HJ, Zhu YM, Sheng JZ, Huang HF, Martinez-Conejero JA, Labarta E, Alama P, Pellicer A, Horcajadas JA, Bosch E. Posters * Endometriosis, Endometrium and Implantation. Hum Reprod 2010. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/de.25.s1.242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
29
|
Royo P, Alcazar JL, Virgen M, Mazaira J, Jurado M, Lopez G. B-mode and Doppler features of struma ovarii. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31:109-110. [PMID: 18098342 DOI: 10.1002/uog.5197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
|
30
|
Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Errasti T, Mallarini G, Melis GB. Comparison of conventional color Doppler imaging and power doppler imaging for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results of a European study. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 83:299-304. [PMID: 11606088 DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional color Doppler (CCD) imaging and power Doppler (PD) imaging in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. METHODS Six hundred fifty-six consecutive women with adnexal masses scheduled for surgery in two European university departments of obstetrics and gynecology underwent preoperative transvaginal ultrasound. The scanning procedure was the same in the two institutions: after B-mode sonography, a CCD/PD imaging scan was performed before pulsed Doppler evaluation. Using both modalities of color Doppler, malignancy was suspected when arterial flow was visualized in an echogenic portion defined as malignant by B-mode. To avoid the risk of bias due to the absence of blindness of the examiner after the first Doppler evaluation, at one institution 328 consecutive women with an adnexal mass were evaluated using only CCD imaging, whereas at the second institution the ultrasonographic evaluation of the same number of masses was performed using PD imaging, and the results were compared prospectively. RESULTS The age, the rate of postmenopausal women, and the rate of ovarian cancer were similar in the two institutions. The false-positive rate of B-mode imaging was similar in the two institutions (17 versus 18%), while the false-positive rates of CCD and PD imaging were 4.6 and 7.4%, respectively. Although the overall diagnostic accuracy of two techniques seems comparable, with a similar value of K (0.81 versus 0.84), a significantly lower sensitivity in differentiation of benign from malignant ovarian lesions was found using CCD (87 versus 100%). CONCLUSIONS At least one of the two Doppler techniques should be used in conjunction with B-mode imaging in order to decrease the false-positive rate of B-mode used alone but CCD imaging showed a higher false-negative rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Martínez-Monge R, Jurado M, Aristu JJ, Moreno M, Cambeiro M, Pérez-Ochoa A, López-García G, Alcazar JL. Intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy during radical surgery for locally advanced and recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82:538-43. [PMID: 11520152 DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to determine the toxicity patterns and clinical usefulness of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) in patients with unfavorable-outcome cervical cancer. METHODS From January 1986 to June 1999, 67 patients (36 recurrent, 31 primary disease) were treated with IOERT. Previously unirradiated patients received preoperative chemoradiation to 45 Gy with cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m(2). IOERT median dose was 12 Gy for primary disease (range: 10-25) and 15 Gy for recurrent disease (range: 10-20). RESULTS The 10-year control rate within the area treated with IOERT ("in-field" (IF)) for the entire group was 69.4, with 92.8 and 46.4% 10-year IF control rates for the primary and recurrent patients, respectively. IF control rate correlated with involvement of the parametrial margin (P = 0.001), amount of residual disease (P = 0.001), and pelvic lymph node involvement (P = 0.032). The overall incidence of toxic events that might be attributable to IOERT was 14.9%. Chronic pain was observed in 8 of 67 evaluable patients (11.9%) and motor neuropathy of the lower extremity in one patient (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS IOERT is a valuable boosting technique in the management of advanced but resectable cervical cancer. Patients, especially recurrent cases, with positive lymph nodes, parametrial involvement, and/or incomplete resections have poor local control rates despite IOERT at the doses used in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Martínez-Monge
- Department of Oncology, Clinica Universitaria, Univeridad de Navarra, 31080 Pamplona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brenière SF, Bosseno MF, Telleria J, Bastrenta B, Yacsik N, Noireau F, Alcazar JL, Barnabé C, Wincker P, Tibayrenc M. Different behavior of two Trypanosoma cruzi major clones: transmission and circulation in young Bolivian patients. Exp Parasitol 1998; 89:285-95. [PMID: 9676706 DOI: 10.1006/expr.1998.4295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Specificity of two widespread Trypanosoma cruzi clonal genotypes or "clonets" (20 and 39) was first analyzed by hybridization with a large set of T. cruzi stocks characterized by multigenic study relying on both MLEE and RAPD. Then, these clonets were detected in the blood of Chagasic children from a Bolivian endemic area by a combination of polymerase chain reaction and clonet-specific DNA hybridization. The distribution of these clonets in patients was significantly different from that observed in the vectors of the same area (Triatoma infestans). In vectors, clonets 20 and 39 are found with comparable frequencies (0.69 and 0.67, respectively) in contrast with patients, in whom clonet 20 and mixed infections exhibit low frequencies. The Chagasic population can be divided into acute infections and latent infections above the accepted criterion of parasitemia (direct microscopic examination). The results suggest a limited selection in the transmission of the two clonets and a further drastic control of clonet 20 parasitemia by the immune system of children patients.
Collapse
|
33
|
Kazadi Buanga J, Alcazar JL, Laparte MC. [Catamenial pneumothorax. Case report and review of the literature]. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 1992; 87:145-7. [PMID: 1579799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Catamenial pneumothorax is a clinical variant of spontaneous pneumothorax. Its etiology is attributed either, generally, to endometriosis involving the diaphragm, or to prostaglandin-induced bronchiolar constriction. Clinically, it coincides with the onset of menstruation and resolves during the subsequent days. Treatment is currently based upon progestational agents and antigonadotrophins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kazadi Buanga
- Clinical Universitaria de Navarra, Departamento de Ginecologia, Pamplona, Espagne
| | | | | |
Collapse
|