Use of G-CSF in matched sibling donor pediatric allogeneic transplantation: a consensus statement from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Transplant Discipline Committee and Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) Executive Committee

Factors Associated with Opting Out of Donation among Registered Young Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors

Young adults enrolled in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donation registries, including the Be The Match registry in the United States, often opt out of the registry when a potential recipient is identified. This results in a limited supply from the most desirable allogeneic source of HSCs used in transplantation to treat serious health conditions. The differences in demographic, psychosocial, registry-related, and donation-related characteristics between those who continue to donation and those who opt out may elucidate the modifiable risk factors for attrition, but these characteristics have not been extensively studied in young donors up to age 30 years. Our goal was to study demographic, psychosocial, registry-related, and donation-related characteristics in a group of young HSC donor registry members who had recently been contacted about a potential recipient, to determine the key characteristics that differ between those who continued toward donation and those who opted out and to examine the extent of these differences. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a random sample of young (age 18 to 30 years) current and former registry members, stratified by race/ethnicity and sex. Demographic, psychosocial (eg, life goals, HSC allocation mistrust), registry-related (eg context and motive for joining the registry), and donation-related (eg, ambivalence, religious objections to donation, knowledge about donation) characteristics were assessed. Chi-square and 2-sample t tests were used to examine differences between those who continued (CT-C group) and those who opted out (CT-NI group). Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted covariate effects on the odds of opting out. A total of 935 participants were surveyed. Donation-related knowledge was higher in the CT-C group than in the CT-NI group. HSC allocation mistrust, religious objections, and concerns about donation were higher in the CT-NI group. After adjusting for covariates in a logistic regression model, we found that having more intrinsic life goals, having more ambivalence, and talking with registry staff only once/twice were significantly associated with opting out of the registry. Ambivalence had the strongest association with opting out. In contrast, remembering joining the registry, believing that parents would support donation, and having medical concerns were significantly associated with continuing toward donation. This effect of medical concerns on donation was discovered only after adjusting for the related but distinct ambivalence variable, with the remaining effect of medical concerns relating to engagement with the donation process and information-seeking. The model had strong discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = .92) and classification accuracy (86.6%). Our data indicate that among young adult members of a national HSC donor registry, ambivalence and limited contact with registry staff were more strongly associated with opting out of donation. Medical concerns were associated with continuing toward donation. Further studies are needed to confirm a causal link between medical concerns and continuing to donation among young donors. Our study suggests that these concerns might not be directly related to attrition, whereas other factors (eg, ambivalence, low donation-related knowledge) are associated with attrition and thus should be targeted for attrition reduction strategies.

Donor Evaluation for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Collection

With the increasing incidence of hematopoietic allogeneic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the importance of securing a cellular product, safely from a donor, and ensuring that the product is without additional risk to the recipient, continues to be of paramount importance. The evaluation of the donor’s medical eligibility and suitability is designed to identify and limit the risk of transmitting infectious, genetic, or neoplastic diseases to the recipient through the product. It also aims to ensure a maximum level of safety for the donor and informs them of the risks of donation. Several regulatory agencies, national and international registries, and accreditation bodies have facilitated the availability and safe provision of human cells, tissues, and cellular- and tissue-based products not only at local institutions but also through international exchange.

Collection of hematopoietic stem cells and immune effector cells in small children

Apheresis procedures are standard of care for a wide range of indications in children, collection of hematopoietic stem cells being the most frequent one. With increasing numbers of hematopoietic stem cell transplants, advances in graft manipulation techniques and the development of innovative therapies using immune effector cells and gene therapy, apheresis within the pediatric population is growing in demand. While young children have higher circulating white blood cell counts and robustly mobilize hematopoietic stem cells, apheresis machines were designed for use within the adult population and apheresis procedures in children, particularly small children, can be more challenging as vascular access, collection techniques and impact of extracorporeal volumes increase the rate of adverse events. In this article we review topics of particular relevance to hematopoietic stem cell and immune effector cell collections in small children.

Donor Selection for Allogenic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical and Ethical Considerations

Allogenic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established treatment for many diseases. Stem cells may be obtained from different sources: mobilized peripheral blood stem cells, bone marrow, and umbilical cord blood. The progress in transplantation procedures, the establishment of experienced transplant centres, and the creation of unrelated adult donor registries and cord blood banks gave those without an human leucocyte antigen- (HLA-) identical sibling donor the opportunity to find a donor and cord blood units worldwide. HSCT imposes operative cautions so that the entire donation/transplantation procedure is safe for both donors and recipients; it carries with it significant clinical, moral, and ethical concerns, mostly when donors are minors. The following points have been stressed: the donation should be excluded when excessive risks for the donor are reasonable, donors must receive an accurate information regarding eventual adverse events and health burden for the donors themselves, a valid consent is required, and the recipient's risks must be outweighed by the expected benefits. The issue of conflict of interest, when the same physician has the responsibility for both donor selection and recipient care, is highlighted as well as the need of an adequate insurance protection for all the parties involved.

Factors associated with bone marrow stem cell yield for pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplantation: The impact of donor characteristics

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of donor characteristics on CD34⁺ cell yield in BM harvest. Between April 2010 and November 2013, consecutive donors who underwent BM harvesting in our BM transplantation unit were retrospectively investigated. Donors were classified into two groups: those who donated BM without mobilization (steady-state BM donors) and those who received G-CSF for stem cell mobilization (G-CSF-primed BM donors). Donor characteristics (age, gender, race, body weight, BMI, and laboratory factors including donor's leukocyte, platelet, and monocyte) and their relationship with total nuclear cell and CD34⁺ cell numbers has been evaluated. A total of 64 healthy related donors (29 males/35 females, median age 11.2 years; 49 [76.6%] younger than 18 and 36 [56.3%] younger than 12 years) were included in the study. The median CD34⁺ cell yield in the harvest was 0.12×10⁶ /L (0.02-0.21) in SS-BM donors and 0.18×10⁶ /L (0.09-0.67) in GP-BM donors (P=.03). Median of CD34⁺ cell count given to recipients was 2.6×10⁶ /recipient body weight (1.3-19.3) in SS-BM yields and 3.8×10⁶ /recipient body weight (1.1-10.2) in GP-BM yields, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that donor height and pre-G-CSF platelet were the most important parameters to obtain a sufficient BM harvest. Our data suggest that the shorter donors and the donors with higher thrombocyte counts may offer more hematopoietic stem cell. The height and thrombocyte count of the donors should be taken into consideration before planning the targeted CD34⁺ cell count especially for pediatric donors.

Stem cell mobilization and collection from pediatric patients and healthy children

Today, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a standard treatment for a variety of conditions in children, including certain malignancies, hemoglobinopathies, bone marrow failure syndromes, immunodeficiency and inborn metabolic disease. Two fundamentally different types of HSCT are categorized by the source of the stem cells. The first, autologous HSCT represents infusion of patient's own hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) obtained from the patient; the second, allogeneic HSCT refers to the infusion of HSCs obtained from a donor via bone marrow harvest or apheresis. Bone marrow has been the typical source for HSCs for pediatric donors. Bone marrow harvest is a safe procedure mainly related to mild and transient side effects. Recently, a dramatically increased use of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in the autologous as well as allogeneic setting has been seen worldwide. There are limited data comparing mobilization regimens; also mobilization practices vary widely in children. The most commonly used approach includes granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 10 mg/kg/day as a single daily dose for 4 days before the day of leukapheresis. G-CSF induced pain was less reported in children compared to adult donors. For the collection, there are several technical problems, derived from the size of the patient or donor, which must be considered before and during the apheresis. Vascular access, extracorporeal circuit volume, blood flow rates are the main limiting factors for PBSC collection in small children. Most children younger than 12 years require central vascular access for apheresis; line placement may require either general anesthesia or conscious sedation and many of the complications arise from the central venous catheter. In this review, we discuss that the ethical considerations and some principals regarding children serving as stem cell donors and the commonest sources of HSCs are presented in children, together with a discussion of how to collect and process these cells.

Systemic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances wound healing in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB): Results of a pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic nonhealing wounds are the norm in patients with inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB), especially those with dystrophic EB (DEB). A possible benefit in wound healing after subcutaneous treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was suggested from an anecdotal report of a patient given this during stem cell mobilization before bone-marrow transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether benefit in wound healing in DEB skin might result after 6 daily doses of G-CSF and to confirm its safety.

METHODS

Patients were assessed for changes in total body blister and erosion counts, surface areas of selected wounds, and specific symptomatology after treatment.

RESULTS

Seven patients with DEB (recessive, 6; dominant, 1) were treated daily with subcutaneous G-CSF (10 μg/kg/dose) and reevaluated on day 7. For all patients combined, median reductions of 75.5% in lesional size and 36.6% in blister/erosion counts were observed. When only the 6 responders were considered, there were median reductions of 77.4% and 38.8% of each of these measured parameters, respectively. No adverse side effects were noted.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include small patient number, more than 1 DEB subtype included, and lack of untreated age-matched control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous G-CSF may be beneficial in promoting wound healing in some patients with DEB when conventional therapies fail.

Children as hematopoietic cell donors in research: when is it approvable?

With increasing frequency, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation involving children is being performed in the research setting. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, however, cannot be performed without a hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor. This donor is often a sibling of the recipient and may also be a child. In such circumstances, it is unclear whether or how the federal regulations for pediatric research apply to the minor donors. This introductory paper reviews the issues to be considered while evaluating studies that use HSCs obtained from minor donors and identifies areas where further research is needed. In the era of increasing applicability for donor-derived cellular therapies, we provide a suggested framework for determining when minor donors qualify as human research subjects and when their participation can be approved under the federal regulations.

Hematopoetic stem cell transplantation in children

Bone marrow transplantation is called hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), since peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood can also be used as sources of stem cell currently. In children, bone marrow transplantation is used as a definite treatment method in many diseases including hemoglobinopaties, immune deficiencies, bone marrow failure and congenital metabolic diseases in addition to hematological malignancies. In addition to the underlying disease, the most important factors which have an impact on prognosis include infections which develop during the process of transplantation and graft-versus-host disease. In this article, it was aimed to give brief information on stem cell sources, preparation therapies, HSCT indications and post-transplantation complications in children.

The management of the sibling hematopoietic stem cell donor

Hematopoietic stem cell transplants are procedures with curative potential for patients with diseased, damaged, or absent stem cells. Because a sibling has the best chance of immunocompatibility with one in need of a transplant, siblings are the most suitable donors of stem cells. However, when siblings are stem cell donors, various ethical issues arise concerning the risks and benefits to the pediatric donor. Because of the critical and potential rapid deterioration of the recipient's condition, the needs of the sibling donor may be overlooked. This potential lack of advocacy for the pediatric sibling donor creates a role for the primary care provider to assess the child's physical and psychological ability to undergo the donation procedure, examine the ethical issues in choosing to use the pediatric sibling as the stem cell donor, prepare the child for the procedure, and follow-up with the sibling donor once the procedure is completed.

Risk of complications during hematopoietic stem cell collection in pediatric sibling donors: a prospective European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Pediatric Diseases Working Party study

We investigated prospectively factors influencing the safety of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection in 453 pediatric donors. The children in the study donated either BM or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) according to center policy. A large variability in approach to donor issues was observed between the participating centers. Significant differences were observed between BM and PBSC donors regarding pain, blood allotransfusion, duration of hospital stay, and iron supplementation; however, differences between the groups undergoing BM vs PBSC donation preclude direct risk comparisons between the 2 procedures. The most common adverse event was pain, reported mainly by older children after BM harvest, but also observed after central venous catheter (CVC) placement for PBSC collection. With regard to severe adverse events, one patient (0.7%) developed a pneumothorax with hydrothorax after CVC placement for PBSC collection. The risk of allotransfusion after BM harvest was associated with a donor age of < 4 years and a BM harvest volume of > 20 mL/kg. Children < 4 years were at higher risk than older children for allotransfusion after BM harvest and there was a higher risk of complications from CVC placement before apheresis. We conclude that PBSC and BM collection are safe procedures in children.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in children

Five-year survival rates for childhood cancer now exceed 80% and with the significant progress made by the transplant community in developing less toxic conditioning regimens and in the treatment of posttransplant complications, allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) contributes significantly to that population of long-term survivors. In this context, the acute and long-term toxicities of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) have an ever-increasing effect on organ function, quality of life, and survival; patients and families who initially felt great relief to be cured from the primary disease, now face the challenge of a chronic debilitating illness for which preventative and treatment strategies are suboptimal. Hence, the development of novel strategies that reduce and or control cGVHD, preserve graft-versus-tumor effects, facilitate engraftment and immune reconstitution, and enhance survival after allo-HSCT represents one of the most significant challenges facing physician-scientists and patients.

Children as hematopoietic stem cell donors

In the past half-century, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has become standard treatment for a variety of diseases in children and adults, including selected hematologic malignancies, immunodeficiencies, hemoglobinopathies, bone marrow failure syndromes, and congenital metabolic disorders. There are 3 sources of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells: bone marrow, peripheral blood, and umbilical cord blood; each has its own benefits and risks. Children often serve as hematopoietic stem cell donors, most commonly for their siblings. HLA-matched biological siblings are generally preferred as donors because of reduced risks of transplant-related complications as compared with unrelated donors. This statement includes a discussion of the ethical considerations regarding minors serving as stem cell donors, using the traditional benefit/burden calculation from the perspectives of both the donor and the recipient. The statement also includes an examination of the circumstances under which a minor may ethically participate as a hematopoietic stem cell donor, how the risks can be minimized, what the informed-consent process should entail, the role for a donor advocate (or some similar mechanism), and other ethical concerns. The American Academy of Pediatrics holds that minors can ethically serve as stem cell donors when specific criteria are fulfilled.

Sibling stem cell donor experiences at a single institution

Allogeneic bone marrow (BM) and cytokine mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation can be curative for patients with malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Siblings are most often selected as a donor match; however, research on sibling donors is limited and has focused primarily on conventional BM donors. This exploratory study describes the experiences of PBSC sibling donors at a single institution. Through retrospective interviews, 14 sibling donors shared their perceived needs and concerns before and after their stem cell collection. Donors identified fears about the donation procedure, and expressed the need for more information about transplant outcome and complications. The inclusion of the sibling donors themselves, rather than the report of their parents or health-care providers and the qualitative nature of the structured design allowed sibling donors to describe their concerns and thoughts without being restrained by the beliefs of the participant's parents, researcher or sibling's medical team. Suggestions for visual educational tools, psychosocial interventions and future research are provided.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration to healthy individuals and persons with chronic neutropenia or cancer: an overview of safety considerations from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports project

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely administered to donors who provide peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for individuals who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Questions have been raised about the safety of G-CSF in this setting. Herein, the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) project investigators reviewed the literature on G-CSF-associated adverse events in healthy individuals or persons with chronic neutropenia or cancer. Toxicities identified included bone pain and rare instances of splenic rupture, allergic reactions, flares of underlying autoimmune disorders, lung injury and vascular events. Among healthy individuals, four patients developed splenic rupture shortly after G-CSF administration and three patients developed acute myeloid leukemia 1 to 5 years after G-CSF administration. Registry studies identified no increased risks of malignancy among healthy individuals who received G-CSF before PBSC harvesting. However, more than 2000 donors would have to be followed for 10 years to detect a 10-fold increase in leukemia risk. Our review identifies bone pain as the most common toxicity of G-CSF administration. There are questions about a causal relationship between G-CSF administration and acute leukemia, but more long-term safety data from database registries are needed to adequately evaluate such a relationship.

Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Stem cell source

Bone marrow (BM) has been used for many years as the unique source of progenitor cells for allogeneic transplantation. However, two other sources of progenitor cells, peripheral blood (PB) and umbilical cord (UC), are being increasingly used. The type of graft is one of the most important factors in determining the speed and robustness of the reconstitution after the transplant of monocytes, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, NK cells, and dendritic cells. This fact is of especial relevance since the most important reactions after allogeneic transplants - e.g. graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), graft-versus-leukaemia effect (GvL), achievement of full donor chimerism, and fight against infections - are strongly influenced by a rapid and robust reconstitution of these cells. For this reason, the choice of the type of graft for allogeneic transplantation will influence the clinical outcome.

Clinical outcomes and graft characteristics in pediatric matched sibling donor transplants using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed bone marrow and steady-state bone marrow

Matched sibling donor (MSD) transplant is a life-saving procedure for children with various hematological malignancies and non-malignancies. Traditionally, steady-state bone marrow (S-BM) has been used as the source of stem cells. More recently, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) after granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization has gained popularity. Adult studies of G-CSF-primed BM (G-BM) have shown that it produces rapid white blood cell engraftment like PBSC, but with less chronic graft-vs.-host disease. No such study has been published in pediatric patients. We conducted a pilot clinical trial of G-BM for pediatric patients. Ten patients were enrolled and were compared to a contemporaneous group of 12 patients who received S-BM. Patients in the G-BM group received a higher dose of total nucleated cells/kg (7.01 vs. 3.76 x 10(8), p = 0.0009), higher granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM)/kg (7.19 vs. 3.53 x 10(5), p = 0.01) and had shorter inpatient length of stay (28 vs. 40 days, p = 0.04). The engraftment, transfusion requirement and disease-free survival between the two groups were similar. We concluded that G-BM should be considered as an alternative graft source to S-BM, with the benefits of larger graft cell dose, higher CFU-GM dose and shorter length of stay.

The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia in children: an evidence-based review

Clinical research examining the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in children is presented and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence are presented in the table entitled "Summary of Treatment Recommendations Made by the Expert Panel for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia" and were reached unanimously by a panel of experts in AML. The identified priority areas of needed future research in pediatric AML include: What is the role of risk group stratification, including the role of cytogenetics, in selection of patients for allogeneic SCT, especially those in first CR? What is the appropriate timing and use of alternative donor SCT, given that matched unrelated donor SCT appears to yield outcomes equivalent to matched related donor SCT? What is the role of reduced intensity SCT (including the use of fludarabine-based preparative regimens) and/or other immunomodulatory approaches to maximize the graft-versus-leukemic effect? and What is the role of biologically targeted agents (ie, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, farnesyl transferase inhibitors, Flt-3 inhibitors, etc) in the treatment of AML, including induction, consolidation, conditioning regimens, and after SCT?

Erythropoietin after a century of research: younger than ever

In the light of the enthusiasm regarding the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo) and its analogues for treatment of the anaemias of chronic renal failure and malignancies it is worth remembering that today's success has been based on a century of laborious research. The concept of the humoral regulation of haematopoiesis was first formulated in 1906. The term 'erythropoietin' for the erythropoiesis-stimulating hormone was introduced in 1948. Native human Epo was isolated in 1977 and its gene cloned in 1985. During the last 15 yr, major progress has been made in identifying the molecules controlling Epo gene expression, primarily the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIF) that are regulated by specific O2 and oxoglutarate requiring Fe2+-containing dioxygenases. With respect to the action of Epo, its dimeric receptor (Epo-R) has been characterised and shown to signal through protein kinases, anti-apoptotic proteins and transcription factors. The demonstration of Epo-R in non-haematopoietic tissues indicates that Epo is a pleiotropic viability and growth factor. The neuroprotective and cardioprotective potentials of Epo are reviewed with a focus on clinical research. In addition, studies utilising the Epo derivatives with prolonged half-life, peptidic and non-peptidic Epo mimetics, orally active drugs stimulating endogenous Epo production and Epo gene transfer are reviewed.

Hematopoietic stem cell donation in children: a review of the sibling donor experience

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) represents the second most frequent major organ transplant in the United States. Compared with other family members, siblings are more likely to be immunologically matched with the recipient and therefore are often the most suitable donors. Due to a dearth of information on the positive and adverse effects of HSCT on pediatric sibling donors, we sought to examine available data. Eight published reports assessing the pediatric sibling donor experience were identified in the literature. Studies were predominately small (n < 44) and cross-sectional. Results suggest a range of psychological distress responses with higher distress in pediatric donor than non-donor siblings. Recommendations include future longitudinal research on sibling donor psychosocial adjustment, identification of sibling donors at high risk for maladaptive responses, and development of educational and psychosocial interventions for this overlooked pediatric population.