Use of capillary blood to diagnose hereditary spherocytosis

Applications of Flow Cytometry in Diagnosis and Evaluation of Red Blood Cell Disorders

Clinical flow cytometry plays a vital role in the diagnosis and monitoring of various red blood cell disorders. The high throughput, precision, and automation potential of this technique allows for cost-effective and timely analysis compared to older and more manual test methods. Flow cytometric analysis serves as the gold standard diagnostic method for multiple hematological disorders, especially in clinical scenarios where an assay needs to have high sensitivity, high specificity, and a short turnaround time. In this review, we discuss the role of flow cytometric analysis in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, fetal-maternal hemorrhage, and hereditary spherocytosis.

Comparison of a modified flow cytometry osmotic fragility test with the classical method for the diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis

BACKGROUND

Hereditary spherocytosis (HS) is the most common inherited hemolytic anemia. The flow cytometric test using eosin-5'maleimide (EMA) is a well-established diagnostic method. However, in order to improve HS detection, it is recommended that EMA and an osmotic fragility test (OFT) both be performed. OFT is time consuming and labor intensive. We used a flow cytometric (FOFT) adaptation of the classical OFT reported by Yamamoto. We compare the FOFT to the classical OFT including practical data and propose options for simplifying this method.

METHODS

Suspected and known HS patients and controls were tested by the following methods: EMA, OFT, and FOFT including some modifications.

RESULTS

The FOFT method is robust and correlates to loss of red blood cells. OFT and FOFT gave similar results in healthy controls and four HS patients. Normal range for FOFT in 70 adults is shown and can be used as a reference value. Neonates should have their own normal range defined. Overnight sample incubation at 37°C did not add information to the FOFT results.

CONCLUSION

Our modified Yamomoto FOFT can replace the classic OFT as the addition to EMA for the diagnosis of HS. The use of flow cytometry in both these methods requires small sample volume, is reproducible, simpler, and produces results more rapidly.

Clinical Diagnosis of Red Cell Membrane Disorders: Comparison of Osmotic Gradient Ektacytometry and Eosin Maleimide (EMA) Fluorescence Test for Red Cell Band 3 (AE1, SLC4A1) Content for Clinical Diagnosis

The measurement of band 3 (AE1, SLC4A1, CD233) content of red cells by eosin-5- maleimide (EMA) staining is swiftly replacing conventional osmotic fragility (OF) test as a tool for laboratory confirmation of hereditary spherocytosis across the globe. Our group has systematically evaluated the EMA test as a method to screen for a variety of anemias in the last 10 years, and compared these results to those obtained with the osmotic gradient ektacytometry (osmoscans) which we have used over three decades. Our overall experience allowed us to characterize the distinctive patterns with the two tests in several congenital erythrocyte membrane disorders, such as hereditary spherocytosis (HS), hereditary elliptocytosis (HE), Southeast Asian Ovalocytosis (SAO), hereditary pyropoikilocytosis (HPP) variants, erythrocyte volume disorders, various red cell enzymopathies, and hemoglobinopathies. A crucial difference between the two methodologies is that osmoscans measure red blood cell deformability of the entire sample of RBCs, while the EMA test examines the band 3 content of individual RBCs. EMA content is influenced by cell size as smaller red cells have lower amount of total membrane than larger cells. The SAO mutation alters the EMA binding site resulting in a lower EMA MCF even as the band 3 content itself is unchanged. Thus, EMA scan results should be interpreted with caution and both the histograms and dot plots should be analyzed in the context of the clinical picture and morphology.

Old and new insights into the diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis

Hereditary spherocytosis (HS) belongs to the group of congenital hemolytic anemias resulting from plasma membrane protein deficiency. When diagnosed too late, HS bares the risk of long-term complications including gall stones and severe anemia. Here, there are discussed advances in HS screening and diagnostics, with a particular focus on methodologies, most of which are available in clinical laboratories worldwide.

Tokyo-1 Mutation: Hereditary Spherocytosis in a Hispanic Newborn Presenting as Early Onset Severe Hyperbilirubinemia

BACKGROUND

Hereditary spherocytosis in the Hispanic population does not often present with severe hyperbilirubinemia. Spectrin and band 3 mutations are most frequent in this population.

CASE REPORT

We present a Hispanic full-term female newborn with early onset significant hyperbilirubinemia without a history of familial hemolytic disorders. She was diagnosed with hereditary spherocytosis based on laboratory findings, including presence of spherocytes on a peripheral smear, and was later found by next-generation sequencing to have Tokyo-1 mutation, an ANK1 gene mutation, that was previously only reported in Japanese population.

CONCLUSION

Our report adds to the currently limited literature of the genetic spectrum and characteristics of hereditary spherocytosis in the Hispanic population. The absence of a positive family history does not preclude hereditary spherocytosis as a differential for pathologic neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

Hereditary Spherocytosis in the Neonatal Period: A Case Report

Hereditary spherocytosis (HS) is the third most common yet most frequently underrecognized, congenitally acquired hemolytic disease of the neonate. Hereditary spherocytosis is caused by a defect of one or more erythrocyte membrane proteins, which leads to an increased rate of destruction of circulating red blood cells. The HS spectrum of symptoms is varied from asymptomatic to intrauterine hydrops. Diagnostic tests range from a complete blood count (CBC) analysis to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing. Management in the neonatal period focuses primarily on associated comorbidities, including the prevention of severe hyperbilirubinemia and anemia. Life span implications of HS include hemolysis, jaundice, anemia, splenomegaly, and periodic gallstones. Early identification and diagnosis of HS is essential to ensure proper monitoring and medical management throughout infancy, childhood, and adulthood.

A pediatrician's practical guide to diagnosing and treating hereditary spherocytosis in neonates

Newborn infants who have hereditary spherocytosis (HS) can develop anemia and hyperbilirubinemia. Bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction is less likely in these neonates if the diagnosis of HS is recognized and appropriate treatment provided. Among neonates listed in the USA Kernicterus Registry, HS was the third most common underlying hemolytic condition after glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and ABO hemolytic disease. HS is the leading cause of direct antiglobulin test (direct Coombs) negative hemolytic anemia requiring erythrocyte transfusion in the first months of life. We anticipate that as physicians become more familiar with diagnosing HS in the newborn period, fewer neonates with HS will develop hazardous hyperbilirubinemia or present to emergency departments with unanticipated symptomatic anemia. We predict that early suspicion, prompt diagnosis and treatment, and anticipatory guidance will prevent adverse outcomes in neonates with HS. The purpose of this article was to review the neonatal presentation of HS and to provide practical and up-to-date means of diagnosing and treating HS in neonates.

Mean corpuscular volume of control red blood cells determines the interpretation of eosin-5'-maleimide (EMA) test result in infants aged less than 6 months

Eosin-5′-maleimide (EMA) binding test is a flow cytometric test used to detect hereditary spherocytosis (HS). To perform the test sample from patients, 5–6 reference samples of red blood are needed. Our aim was to investigate how the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) of red blood cells influences on the value of fluorescence of bounded EMA dye and how the choice of reference samples affects the test result. EMA test was performed in peripheral blood from 404 individuals, including 31 children suffering from HS. Mean fluorescence channel of EMA-RBCs was measured with Cytomics FC500 flow cytometer. Mean corpuscular volume of RBCs was assessed with LH750 Beckman Coulter. Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad Prism. The correlation Spearman coefficient between mean channel of fluorescence of EMA-RBCs and MCV was r = 0.39, p < 0.0001. Interpretation of EMA test depends on MCV of the reference samples. If reference blood samples have lower MCV than the patients MCV, EMA test result might be negative. Due to different MCV values of RBCs in infancy and ca. Three months later, EMA test in neonates might be interpreted falsely negative. Samples from children younger than 3 months old had EMA test result 86.1 ± 11.7 %, whereas same samples that analyzed 4.1 ± 2.1 later had results of 75.4 ± 4.5 %, p < 0.05. Mean fluorescence of EMA-bound RBC depends on RBC’s volume. MCV of reference samples affects EMA test results; thus, we recommend selection of reference samples with MCV in range of ±2 fL compared to MCV of patient RBC’s.

Delay in the measurement of eosin-5′-maleimide (EMA) binding does not affect the test result for the diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis

BACKGROUND

The eosin-5′-maleimide (EMA) binding test is a flow cytometric test widely used to detect hereditary spherocytosis (HS). EMA binds to plasma membrane proteins of red blood cells (RBCs), mainly to band 3 protein. The mean fluorescence of EMA-stained RBCs in HS patients is lower when compared with control RBCs due to the decreased amount of target proteins. EMA dye in aqueous solution is sensitive to light and high temperature. Its fluorescence can decrease when exposed to light or ambient temperatures higher than 4°C. The aim of the study was to evaluate the stability of fluorescence readings of EMA-labeled RBCs over a period of 24 h.

METHODS

The EMA test was performed in peripheral blood from 35 patients with microcytic anemia (five with HS, and 30 without HS). Peripheral blood samples were stained immediately after blood collection and analyzed using a flow cytometer at three time points: 0, after 1 and 24 h of storage at 4°C in the darkness. The results are presented as the percentage of normal control RBCs fluorescence. Flow cytometric studies were performed with Cytomics FC500 (Beckman Coulter, USA).

RESULTS

In HS patients the mean result of the test reached 66.72%±9.26% of normal controls, and in non-HS patients the EMA result was 99.48%±5.03% of normal control cells. The results of patients with HS were 66.72%±9.26%, 66.90%±10.24% and 67.86%±11.31% at 0 h, and after 1 and 24 h of storage, respectively. The results obtained from non-HS patients at time 0, after 1 and 24 h of storage reached 99.48%±5.03%, 99.49%±5.34% and 99.78%±6.13%, respectively. There was no difference between the results from each time point in samples from patients with or without HS.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the EMA binding test do not depend on storage time of stained samples when stored at 4°C up to 24 h after staining.