1
|
Flaadt T, Jaki C, Maier CP, Amorelli G, Klingebiel T, Schlegel PG, Eyrich M, Greil J, Schulte JH, Bader P, Handgretinger R, Lang P. Immune reconstitution after transplantation of autologous peripheral stem cells in children: a comparison between CD34+ selected and nonmanipulated grafts. Cytotherapy 2024:S1465-3249(24)00716-3. [PMID: 38904583 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves the prognosis in pediatric patients with several solid tumors and lymphomas. Little is known about the reconstitution of the immune system after ASCT and the influence of CD34+ cell selection on the reconstitution in pediatric patients. METHODS Between 1990 and 2001, 94 pediatric patients with solid tumors and lymphomas received autologous CD34+ selected or unmanipulated peripheral stem cells after HDC. CD34+ selection was carried out with magnetic microbeads. The absolute numbers of T cells, B cells and natural killer (NK) cells were measured and compared in both groups at various time points post-transplant. RESULTS Recovery of T cells was significantly faster in the unmanipulated group at day 30, with no significant difference later on. Reconstitution of B and NK cells was similar in both groups without significant differences at any time. The CD34+-selected group was divided into patients receiving less or more than 5.385 × 106/kg CD34+ cells. Patients in the CD34+ high-dose group displayed significantly faster reconstitutions of neutrophiles and lymphocyte subsets than the CD34+ low-dose group. CONCLUSIONS Engraftment and reconstitution of leukocytes, B cells and NK cells after transplantation of CD34+ selected stem cells were comparable to that in patients receiving unmanipulated grafts. T-cell recovery was faster in the unmanipulated group only within the first month. However, this delay could be compensated by transplantation of >5.385 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Especially for patients receiving immunotherapy after HDC large numbers of immune effector cells such as NK and T cells are necessary to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Therefore, in patients receiving autologous CD34+-selected grafts, our data emphasize the need to administer high stem cell counts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Flaadt
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Christina Jaki
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; Simulation Center STUPS, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Claus-Philipp Maier
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; Department of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Center for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Germano Amorelli
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Klingebiel
- Goethe University, University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Paul Gerhardt Schlegel
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eyrich
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Johann Greil
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes H Schulte
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Peter Bader
- Goethe University, University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Rupert Handgretinger
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Peter Lang
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yue Z, Gao C, Xing T, Zhao W, Duan C, Wang X, Jin M, Su Y. Combined analysis of PHOX2B at two time points and its value for further risk stratification in high-risk neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30261. [PMID: 36815592 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratification of high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) is crucial for exploring treatments. This study aimed to explore the value of minimal residual disease (MRD) based on PHOX2B levels for further risk stratification in high-risk NB. METHODS The expression of PHOX2B was monitored at two time points (after two and six cycles of induction chemotherapy, TP1 and TP2, respectively) by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The clinical characteristics between groups and survival rates were analyzed. RESULTS The study included 151 high-risk patients. Positive expression of PHOX2B at diagnosis was seen in 129 cases. PHOX2B was mainly expressed in patients with high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels (p < .001), bone marrow metastasis (p < .001), more than three metastatic organs (p < .001), 11q23 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) (p = .007), and when more events occurred (p = .012). The 4-year EFS rate was significantly lower in patients with positive PHOX2B expression compared to the negative group at diagnosis (32.9% ± 6.2% vs. 74.5% ± 10.1%, p = .005). We stratified the 151 patients into three MRD risk groups: low high-risk (low-HR), with TP1 less than 10-4 and TP2 less than 10-4 ; ultra-HR, with TP1 greater than or equal to 10-2 or TP2 greater than or equal to 10-4 , and others classified as intermediate-HR. Patients in ultra-HR had the worst survival rate compared with other two groups (p = .02). In a multivariate model, MRD risk stratification based on PHOX2B levels at TP1 and TP2 was an independent prognostic factor for high-risk patients (p = .001). Patients in ultra-HR were associated with 11q23 LOH (p < .001), more than three organs of metastasis (p = .005), bone marrow metastasis (p < .001), and occurrence of more events (p = .009). CONCLUSIONS MRD risk stratification based on PHOX2B levels at two time points (after two and six cycles of induction chemotherapy) provided a stratification system for high-risk NB, which successfully predicted treatment outcomes. Our results present an effective method for further stratification of high-risk NB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhixia Yue
- Hematologic Disease Laboratory, Hematology Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Beijing, China
- National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Gao
- Hematologic Disease Laboratory, Hematology Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Beijing, China
- National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Tianyu Xing
- Hematologic Disease Laboratory, Hematology Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Beijing, China
- National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Zhao
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Duan
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Xisi Wang
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Mei Jin
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Su
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park JR, Villablanca JG, Hero B, Kushner BH, Wheatley K, Beiske KH, Ladenstein RL, Baruchel S, Macy ME, Moreno L, Seibel NL, Pearson AD, Matthay KK, Valteua-Couanet D. Early-phase clinical trial eligibility and response evaluation criteria for refractory, relapsed, or progressive neuroblastoma: A consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. Cancer 2022; 128:3775-3783. [PMID: 36101004 PMCID: PMC9614386 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International standardized criteria for eligibility, evaluable disease sites, and disease response assessment in patients with refractory, progressive, or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma enrolled in early-phase clinical trials are lacking. METHODS A National Cancer Institute-sponsored Clinical Trials Planning Meeting was convened to develop an international consensus to refine the tumor site eligibility criteria and evaluation of disease response for early-phase clinical trials in children with high-risk neuroblastoma. RESULTS Standardized data collection of patient and disease characteristics (including specified genomic data), eligibility criteria, a definition of evaluable disease, and response evaluations for primary and metastatic sites of disease were developed. Eligibility included two distinct patient groups: progressive disease and refractory disease. The refractory disease group was subdivided into responding persistent disease and stable persistent disease to better capture the clinical heterogeneity of refractory neuroblastoma. Requirements for defining disease evaluable for a response assessment were provided; they included requirements for biopsy to confirm viable neuroblastoma and/or ganglioneuroblastoma in those patients with soft tissue or bone disease not avid for iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine. Standardized evaluations for response components and time intervals for response evaluations were established. CONCLUSIONS The use of international consensus eligibility, evaluability, and response criteria for early-phase clinical studies will facilitate the collection of comparable data across international trials and promote more rapid identification of effective treatment regimens for high-risk neuroblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie R. Park
- Seattle Children’s Hospital and Department of Pediatrics University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle WA, 98105
| | - Judith G. Villablanca
- Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and Department of Pediatrics, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Barbara Hero
- Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, D 50924 Koeln, Germany
| | | | | | - Klaus H. Beiske
- Oslo University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ruth L. Ladenstein
- Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Margaret E. Macy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Lucas Moreno
- Division of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nita L. Seibel
- Clinical Investigations Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Andrew D. Pearson
- Divisions of Cancer Therapeutics and Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research and Children and Young People’s Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey UK (Retired)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nino N, Ishida T, Nakatani N, Lin KS, Win KHN, Mon CY, Nishimura A, Inoue S, Tamura A, Yamamoto N, Uemura S, Saito A, Mori T, Hasegawa D, Kosaka Y, Nozu K, Nishimura N. Minimal residual disease detected by droplet digital PCR in peripheral blood stem cell grafts has a prognostic impact on high-risk neuroblastoma patients. Heliyon 2022; 8:e10978. [PMID: 36276741 PMCID: PMC9578974 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
More than half of high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) patients have experienced relapse due to the activation of chemoresistant minimal residual disease (MRD) even though they are treated by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. Although MRD in high-risk NB patients can be evaluated by quantitative PCR with several sets of neuroblastoma-associated mRNAs (NB-mRNAs), the prognostic significance of MRD in PBSC grafts (PBSC-MRD) is unclear. In the present study, we collected 20 PBSC grafts from 20 high-risk NB patients and evaluated PBSC-MRD detected by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with 7NB-mRNAs (CRMP1, DBH, DDC, GAP43, ISL1, PHOX2B, and TH mRNA). PBSC-MRD in 11 relapsed patients was significantly higher than that in 9 non-relapsed patients. Patients with a higher PBSC-MRD had a lower 3-year event-free survival (P = 0.0148). The present study suggests that PBSC-MRD detected by ddPCR with 7NB-mRNAs has a prognostic impact on high-risk NB patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanako Nino
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Ishida
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Naoko Nakatani
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kyaw San Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kaung Htet Nay Win
- Department of Public Health, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Science, Kobe, Japan
| | - Cho Yee Mon
- Department of Public Health, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Science, Kobe, Japan
| | - Akihiro Nishimura
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Shotaro Inoue
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Akihiro Tamura
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Suguru Uemura
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Atsuro Saito
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takeshi Mori
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Daiichiro Hasegawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kandai Nozu
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Nishimura
- Department of Public Health, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Science, Kobe, Japan,Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang R, Zheng S, Dong R. Circulating tumor cells in neuroblastoma: Current status and future perspectives. Cancer Med 2022; 12:7-19. [PMID: 35632981 PMCID: PMC9844658 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children, accounting for 10% to 20% of deaths of pediatric malignancies. Due to the poor prognosis and significant biological heterogeneity of neuroblastoma, it is essential to develop personalized therapeutics and monitor treatment response. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), as one of the important analytes for liquid biopsy, could facilitate response assessment and outcome prediction for patients in a non-invasive way. Several methods and platforms have been used for the enrichment and detection of CTCs. The enumeration of CTCs counts and evaluation of tumor-specific mRNA transcript levels could provide prognostic information at diagnosis, during or after chemotherapy, and during the process of disease progression. So far, studies into neuroblastoma CTCs are only in the preliminary stages. The quality-controlled large prospective cohort studies are needed to evaluate the clinical significance and statistical rigor of CTC detection methods. Moreover, there remains a lot to be explored and investigated in genotyping characterization of neuroblastoma (NB) CTCs and construction of in-vitro or in-vivo functional models. CTCs and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis will be complementary in understanding tumor heterogeneity and evolution over the course of therapy for patients with NB in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Yang
- Department of Pediatric SurgeryChildren's Hospital of Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Shan Zheng
- Department of Pediatric SurgeryChildren's Hospital of Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Rui Dong
- Department of Pediatric SurgeryChildren's Hospital of Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fan H, Xing T, Hong H, Duan C, Zhao W, Zhao Q, Wang X, Huang C, Zhu S, Jin M, Su Y, Gao C, Ma X. The expression of PHOX2B in bone marrow and peripheral blood predicts adverse clinical outcome in non-high-risk neuroblastoma. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2022; 39:343-356. [PMID: 34752187 DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2021.1995090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Paired-like homeobox 2B (PHOX2B) is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for diagnosing neuroblastoma, as well as detecting minimal residual disease in neuroblastoma. The clinical significance of PHOX2B expression in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples of newly diagnosed patients with very low-, low- and intermediate-risk neuroblastoma remains unknown, to the best of our knowledge. The expression level of PHOX2B in paired BM and PB samples of patients with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma was validated using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTqPCR). Among the 132 patients, 26 exhibited a positive PHOX2B expression BM (19.7%) and 11 in PB (8.3%) samples. PHOX2B was highly expressed in BM and PB samples from patients aged <18 months, with International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System stages M and MS, 1p loss of heterozygosity, and high levels of lactate dehydrogenase, serum ferritin and neuron-specific enolase (p < 0.05). In all eligible patients, the 2-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 94.7 ± 2.0% and 97.7 ± 1.3%, respectively. However, the 2-year EFS rates were significantly decreased to 76.9 ± 8.3% and 63.6 ± 14.5% in patients with a positive PHOX2B expression in BM and PB samples, respectively (p < 0.05). Similarly, the 2-year OS rates were also decreased to 88.5 ± 6.3% and 81.8 ± 11.6% in patients with a positive PHOX2B expression in BM and PB samples, respectively (p < 0.05). In conclusion, a positive PHOX2B expression in BM and PB samples at diagnosis had a strong adverse prognostic effect on patients with non-high-risk neuroblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongjun Fan
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Tianyu Xing
- Hematologic Disease Laboratory, Hematology Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics (Capital Medical University); Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, China
| | - Huimin Hong
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Duan
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Zhao
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Zhao
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Xisi Wang
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng Huang
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Shuai Zhu
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Mei Jin
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Su
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Gao
- Hematologic Disease Laboratory, Hematology Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics (Capital Medical University); Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, China
| | - Xiaoli Ma
- Medical Oncology Department, Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Ocology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, 56 Nan Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Bone Marrow Uptake Pattern in Detecting Bone Marrow Involvement in Pediatric Neuroblastoma Patients. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2022:7556315. [PMID: 35082556 PMCID: PMC8758298 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7556315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To explore the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT bone marrow uptake pattern (BMUP) in detecting bone marrow involvement (BMI) in pediatric neuroblastoma (NB) patients. Methods Ninety-eight NB patients were enrolled in BMI analysis. Four patterns of bone marrow uptake were categorized based on pretreatment cF-FDG PET/CT images. Some crucial inspection indexes and 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters were analyzed. The BMUP was divided into BMUP1, BMUP2, BMUP3, and BMUP4. Paired-like homeobox 2b (PHOX2B) of bone marrow and blood, bone marrow biopsy (BMB) result, and 18F-FDG PET/CT were compared to detect BMI. All patients were followed up for at least six months. Results BMUP had excellent consistency among different physicians. Kappa coefficients of two residents and two attending physicians and between the resident and attending physician, were 0.857, 0.891, and 0.845, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of SUVmax-Bone/Liver was 2.08 to diagnose BMI for BMUP3 patients, and the area under curve (AUC) was 0.873. AUC of PHOX2B of bone marrow (PHOX2B of BM), PHOX2B of blood, BMB, and 18F-FDG PET/CT were 0.916, 0.811, 0.806, and 0.904, respectively. There was no significant difference between PHOX2B of BM and PET/CT. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity in diagnosis of BMI were 92.9%, 92.9%, 97.0%, and 83.9% for PET/CT and 96.7%, 80.6%, 89.6%, and 93.5% for PHOX2B of BM, respectively. Conclusions BMUP of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT is a simple and practical method, which has a relatively high diagnostic efficiency in detecting BMI and might decrease unnecessary invasive inspections in some pediatric NB patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Olm F, Panse L, Dykes JH, Bexell D, Laurell T, Scheding S. Label-free separation of neuroblastoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cells from hematopoietic progenitor cell products by acoustophoresis. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021; 12:542. [PMID: 34654486 PMCID: PMC8518319 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02612-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Graft-contaminating tumor cells correlate with inferior outcome in high-risk neuroblastoma patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and can contribute to relapse. Motivated by the potential therapeutic benefit of tumor cell removal as well as the high prognostic and diagnostic value of isolated circulating tumor cells from stem cell grafts, we established a label-free acoustophoresis-based microfluidic technology for neuroblastoma enrichment and removal from peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) products. Methods Neuroblastoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cells were spiked into PBPC apheresis samples as a clinically relevant model system. Cells were separated by ultrasound in an acoustophoresis microchip and analyzed for recovery, purity and function using flow cytometry, quantitative real-time PCR and cell culture. Results PDX cells and PBPCs showed distinct size distributions, which is an important parameter for efficient acoustic separation. Acoustic cell separation did not affect neuroblastoma cell growth. Acoustophoresis allowed to effectively separate PDX cells from spiked PBPC products. When PBPCs were spiked with 10% neuroblastoma cells, recoveries of up to 98% were achieved for PDX cells while more than 90% of CD34+ stem and progenitor cells were retained in the graft. At clinically relevant tumor cell contamination rates (0.1 and 0.01% PDX cells in PBPCs), neuroblastoma cells were depleted by more than 2-log as indicated by RT-PCR analysis of PHOX2B, TH and DDC genes, while > 85% of CD34+ cells could be retained in the graft. Conclusion These results demonstrate the potential use of label-free acoustophoresis for PBPC processing and its potential to develop label-free, non-contact tumor cell enrichment and purging procedures for future clinical use. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-021-02612-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Olm
- Lund Stem Cell Centre and Division of Molecular Haematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Klinikgatan 26, BMC B12, 221 84, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lena Panse
- Lund Stem Cell Centre and Division of Molecular Haematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Klinikgatan 26, BMC B12, 221 84, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Biotechnology, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josefina H Dykes
- Division of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University and Regional Laboratories, Lund, Sweden
| | - Daniel Bexell
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University Cancer Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Thomas Laurell
- Division of Nanobiotechnology and Lab-On-a-Chip, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Stefan Scheding
- Lund Stem Cell Centre and Division of Molecular Haematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Klinikgatan 26, BMC B12, 221 84, Lund, Sweden. .,Department of Haematology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Su Y, Wang L, Jiang C, Yue Z, Fan H, Hong H, Duan C, Jin M, Zhang D, Qiu L, Cheng X, Xu Z, Ma X. Increased plasma concentration of cell-free DNA precedes disease recurrence in children with high-risk neuroblastoma. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:102. [PMID: 32028911 PMCID: PMC7006086 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6562-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. The high rate of recurrence is associated with a low survival rate for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. There is thus an urgent need to identify effective predictive biomarkers of disease recurrence. Methods A total of 116 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma were recruited at Beijing Children’s Hospital between February 2015 and December 2017. All patients received multidisciplinary treatment, were evaluated for the therapeutic response, and then initiated on maintenance treatment. Blood samples were collected at the beginning of maintenance treatment, every 3 months thereafter, and at the time of disease recurrence. Plasma levels of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were quantified by qPCR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the ability of plasma cfDNA concentration to predict recurrence. Results Of the 116 patients, 36 (31.0%) developed recurrence during maintenance treatment. The median time to recurrence was 19.00, 9.00, and 8.00 months for patients who had achieved complete response (n = 6), partial response (n = 25), and stable disease (n = 5), respectively, after multidisciplinary treatment. The median plasma cfDNA concentration at the time of recurrence was significantly higher than the concentration in recurrence-free patients throughout maintenance treatment (29.34 ng/mL vs 10.32 ng/mL). Patients recorded a plasma cfDNA level ≥ 29 ng/mL an average of 0.55 months before diagnosis of disease recurrence. ROC analysis of the power of plasma cfDNA to distinguish between patients with or without recurrence yielded an area under the curve of 0.825, with optimal sensitivity and specificity of 80.6 and 71.3%, respectively, at a cfDNA level of 12.93 ng/mL. Conclusions High plasma cfDNA concentration is a potential molecular marker to signal disease recurrence in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Su
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Lijun Wang
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company Limited, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company Limited, Eastern Block of Jianwai SOHO, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100022, China
| | - Chiyi Jiang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Zhixia Yue
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Hongjun Fan
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Huimin Hong
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Chao Duan
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Mei Jin
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Dawei Zhang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Lihua Qiu
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company Limited, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company Limited, Eastern Block of Jianwai SOHO, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100022, China
| | - Xianfeng Cheng
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company Limited, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company Limited, Eastern Block of Jianwai SOHO, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100022, China
| | - Zhong Xu
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company Limited, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company Limited, Eastern Block of Jianwai SOHO, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100022, China.
| | - Xiaoli Ma
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Wezel EM, van Zogchel LMJ, van Wijk J, Timmerman I, Vo NK, Zappeij-Kannegieter L, deCarolis B, Simon T, van Noesel MM, Molenaar JJ, van Groningen T, Versteeg R, Caron HN, van der Schoot CE, Koster J, van Nes J, Tytgat GAM. Mesenchymal Neuroblastoma Cells Are Undetected by Current mRNA Marker Panels: The Development of a Specific Neuroblastoma Mesenchymal Minimal Residual Disease Panel. JCO Precis Oncol 2019; 3:1800413. [PMID: 34036221 PMCID: PMC8133311 DOI: 10.1200/po.18.00413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with neuroblastoma in molecular remission remain at considerable risk for disease recurrence. Studies have found that neuroblastoma tissue contains adrenergic (ADRN) and mesenchymal (MES) cells; the latter express low levels of commonly used markers for minimal residual disease (MRD). We identified MES-specific MRD markers and studied the dynamics of these markers during treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Microarray data were used to identify genes differentially expressed between ADRN and MES cell lines. Candidate genes were then studied using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in cell lines and control bone marrow and peripheral blood samples. After selecting a panel of markers, serial bone marrow, peripheral blood, and peripheral blood stem cell samples were obtained from patients with high-risk neuroblastoma and tested for marker expression; survival analyses were also performed. RESULTS PRRX1, POSTN, and FMO3 mRNAs were used as a panel for specifically detecting MES mRNA in patient samples. MES mRNA was detected only rarely in peripheral blood; moreover, the presence of MES mRNA in peripheral blood stem cell samples was associated with low event-free survival and overall survival. Of note, during treatment, serial bone marrow samples obtained from 29 patients revealed a difference in dynamics between MES mRNA markers and ADRN mRNA markers. Furthermore, MES mRNA was detected in a higher percentage of patients with recurrent disease than in those who remained disease free (53% v 32%, respectively; P = .03). CONCLUSION We propose that the markers POSTN and PRRX1, in combination with FMO3, be used for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based detection of MES neuroblastoma mRNA in patient samples because these markers have a unique pattern during treatment and are more prevalent in patients with poor outcome. Together with existing markers of MRD, these new markers should be investigated further in large prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther M van Wezel
- Sanquin Research Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lieke M J van Zogchel
- Sanquin Research Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jalenka van Wijk
- Sanquin Research Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ilse Timmerman
- Sanquin Research Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Thorsten Simon
- Children's Hospital University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Max M van Noesel
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan J Molenaar
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rogier Versteeg
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Huib N Caron
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan Koster
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johan van Nes
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Godelieve A M Tytgat
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Label-free neuroblastoma cell separation from hematopoietic progenitor cell products using acoustophoresis - towards cell processing of complex biological samples. Sci Rep 2019; 9:8777. [PMID: 31217534 PMCID: PMC6584513 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45182-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Processing of complex cell preparations such as blood and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplants using label-free technologies is challenging. Transplant-contaminating neuroblastoma cells (NBCs) can contribute to relapse, and we therefore aimed to provide proof-of-principle evidence that label-free acoustophoretic separation can be applied for diagnostic NBC enrichment and removal ("purging") from human blood and PBPC products. Neuroblastoma cells spiked into blood and PBPC preparations served as model systems. Acoustophoresis enabled to enrich NBCs from mononuclear peripheral blood cells and PBPC samples with recovery rates of up to 60-97%. When aiming at high purity, NBC purities of up to 90% were realized, however, compromising recovery. Acoustophoretic purging of PBPC products allowed substantial tumour cell depletion of 1.5-2.3 log. PBPC loss under these conditions was considerable (>43%) but could be decreased to less than 10% while still achieving NBC depletion rates of 60-80%. Proliferation of cells was not affected by acoustic separation. These results provide first evidence that NBCs can be acoustically separated from blood and stem cell preparations with high recovery and purity, thus indicating that acoustophoresis is a promising technology for the development of future label-free, non-contact cell processing of complex cell products.
Collapse
|
12
|
Uemura S, Ishida T, Thwin KKM, Yamamoto N, Tamura A, Kishimoto K, Hasegawa D, Kosaka Y, Nino N, Lin KS, Takafuji S, Mori T, Iijima K, Nishimura N. Dynamics of Minimal Residual Disease in Neuroblastoma Patients. Front Oncol 2019; 9:455. [PMID: 31214500 PMCID: PMC6558004 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroblastoma is a common extracranial solid tumor of neural crest (NC) origin that accounts for up to 15% of all pediatric cancer deaths. The disease arises from a transient population of NC cells that undergo an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and generate diverse cell-types and tissues. Patients with neuroblastoma are characterized by their extreme heterogeneity ranging from spontaneous regression to malignant progression. More than half of newly diagnosed patients present highly metastatic tumors and are stratified into a high-risk group with dismal outcome. As many as 20% of high-risk patients have residual disease that is refractory or progressive during induction chemotherapy. Although a majority of high-risk patients achieve remission, larger part of those patients has minimal residual disease (MRD) that causes relapse even after additional consolidation therapy. MRD is composed of drug-resistant tumor cells and dynamically presented as cancer stem cells (CSCs) in residual tumors, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in peripheral blood (PB), and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow (BM) and other metastatic sites. EMT appears to be a key mechanism for cancer cells to acquire MRD phenotypes and malignant aggressiveness. Due to the restricted availability of residual tumors, PB and BM have been used to isolate and analyze CTCs and DTCs to evaluate MRD in cancer patients. In addition, recent technical advances make it possible to use circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shed from tumor cells into PB for MRD evaluation. Because MRD can be detected by tumor-specific antigens, genetic or epigenetic changes, and mRNAs, numerous assays using different methods and samples have been reported to detect MRD in cancer patients. In contrast to the tumor-specific gene-rearrangement-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and the oncogenic fusion-gene-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and several solid tumors, the clinical significance of MRD remains to be established in neuroblastoma. Given the extreme heterogeneity of neuroblastoma, dynamics of MRD in neuroblastoma patients will hold a key to the clinical validation. In this review, we summarize the biology and detection methods of cancer MRD in general and evaluate the available assays and clinical significance of neuroblastoma MRD to clarify its dynamics in neuroblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suguru Uemura
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Ishida
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Khin Kyae Mon Thwin
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Akihiro Tamura
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kenji Kishimoto
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Daiichiro Hasegawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nanako Nino
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kyaw San Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Satoru Takafuji
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takeshi Mori
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kazumoto Iijima
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Nishimura
- Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Su Y, Wang L, Wang X, Yue Z, Xing T, Zhao W, Zhao Q, Duan C, Huang C, Han Y, Qiu L, Cheng X, Liu Y, Ma X. Dynamic alterations of plasma cell free DNA in response to chemotherapy in children with neuroblastoma. Cancer Med 2019; 8:1558-1566. [PMID: 30793512 PMCID: PMC6488154 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To improve cure rates for neuroblastoma (NB), it is important and necessary to evaluate therapy response. Our investigation focuses on using plasma cell free DNA (cfDNA) as a biomarker to determine tumor burden and minimal residual disease (MRD) of NB patients during chemotherapy. Methods Total 58 NB patients were recruited from July 2016 to December 2017. Therapy regime and risk classification were based on COG standard and BCH‐NB‐2007 protocol. RECIST study was used to judge response to therapy at the end of fourth cycle of chemotherapy (CC4) and maintenance stage (MS) respectively. Serial quantifications of cfDNA, NSE, and LDH were examined at four stages, including newly diagnosed, second and CC4, and maintenance. Results During early chemotherapy, 65.5% of NB kids responded well. Consistently, cfDNA, NSE, and LDH levels were down‐regulated in NB patients with partial remission (PR) compared to those with stable disease (SD). In both training and predicting sets, the levels of cfDNA were significantly comparable between PR and SD only at CC4 stage. To predict the insufficient response to early chemotherapy, the optimal AUC value of cfDNA was 0.732 and 0.747 in training and predicting sets respectively, with a sensitivity of 63.2% and 80% specificity at 11.59 ng/ml and a sensitivity of 68.4% and 90% specificity at 10.35 ng/ml. At MS, responded NB patients were slightly increased up to 70%. This evaluation was confirmed by further decrease in cfDNA and NSE levels during intermediate chemotherapy in comparison with early stage. Conclusion The dynamic change of cfDNA was considered as a surrogate biomarker to evaluate tumor burden and MRD of NB during early and intermediate therapy periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Su
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Lijun Wang
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company Limited, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company limited, Beijing, China
| | - Xisi Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Zhixia Yue
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Tianyu Xing
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Duan
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng Huang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Han
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company Limited, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company limited, Beijing, China
| | - Lihua Qiu
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company Limited, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company limited, Beijing, China
| | - Xianfeng Cheng
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company Limited, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company limited, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company Limited, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company limited, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoli Ma
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ye W, Wang J, Li W, Shen H. Comparative Analysis of Flow Cytometry and Cytomorphology for Neuroblastoma Cell Detection in Effusion and Bone Marrow Specimens. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2019; 38:1-7. [PMID: 30667298 DOI: 10.1080/15513815.2018.1494231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Background:Neuroblastoma (NB) frequently metastasizes to the bone marrow (BM), pleural and peritoneal cavities. The detection of NB cells in the BM and effusion specimens is important in clinical staging. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the ability of flow cytometry (FCM) and cytomorphology (CM) in detecting NB cells. Materials and methods:From 21 patients with suspected NB metastasis, BM and effusion specimens were analyzed by FCM and CM. Results:A total of 16 effusion (76.2%) and 9 BM (42.9%) specimens were classified by FCM as positive for malignancy. CM revealed 12 (57.1%) and 9 (42.9%) positive effusion and BM specimens, respectively. There were three effusions detected by CM but not by FCM. There was no significant differences between FCM and CM in the detection of NB cells in effusions (p = 0.344). Conclusions:FCM can be used as an adjunct to CM for the detection of NB cells in effusion specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wensong Ye
- a Department of Surgery , Zhejiang University School of Medicine Children's Hospital , Hangzhou , China
| | - Jinhu Wang
- a Department of Surgery , Zhejiang University School of Medicine Children's Hospital , Hangzhou , China
| | - Wei Li
- b Clinical Laboratory , Zhejiang University School of Medicine Children's Hospital , Hangzhou , China
| | - Hongqiang Shen
- b Clinical Laboratory , Zhejiang University School of Medicine Children's Hospital , Hangzhou , China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Druy AE, Shorikov EV, Tsaur GA, Popov AM, Zaychikov AN, Tuponogov SN, Saveliev LI, Tytgat GAM, Fechina LG. Prospective investigation of applicability and the prognostic significance of bone marrow involvement in patients with neuroblastoma detected by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27354. [PMID: 30007008 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of bone marrow (BM) involvement in patients with neuroblastoma is crucial for staging and defining prognosis. Furthermore, the persistence of residual tumor cells in the BM is associated with an unfavorable outcome. METHODS Expression of PHOX2B, TH, ELAVL4, and B4GALNT1 (GD2-synthase) was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in neuroblastoma cell lines, control BM samples, and in BM samples from patients. The threshold level of expression for each gene was established through receiver operator characteristic analysis and used to determine the diagnostic test performance. The prognostic significance of BM involvement was assessed by survival rates calculations. The median of follow-up time was 36.1 months. RESULTS Neither PHOX2B nor TH expression was detected in control BM, while expression of ELAVL4 was found in 20 (76.9%) and GD2-synthase in 15 (57.7%) of 26 samples. The overall correct predictive value for TH, ELAVL4, and GD2-synthase, based on thresholds levels, was 0.952, 0.828, and 0.767, respectively, whereas the overall correct predictive value for PHOX2B was 0.994. The PHOX2B/TH expression in diagnostic BM of patients with neuroblastoma corresponded with a decreased survival rate (P < 0.001) in the total cohort and in different risk groups. Predominance of normalized expression of PHOX2B over TH > 1.68 in the diagnostic BM samples demonstrated an adverse prognostic effect (P = 0.006). Persistence of PHOX2B/TH expression in the BM during and after induction chemotherapy resulted in dismal outcome (P = 0.022 and P = 0.012). CONCLUSION PHOX2B and TH are the most optimal markers for detection of BM involvement, allowing identification of high-risk patients. Predominance of PHOX2B expression over TH has a strong adverse prognostic impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander E Druy
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russian Federation.,Research Institute of Medical Cell Technologies, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
| | - Egor V Shorikov
- PET-Technology Center of Nuclear Medicine, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
| | - Grigory A Tsaur
- Research Institute of Medical Cell Technologies, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation.,Regional Children's Hospital N1, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation.,Department of Immunochemistry, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
| | - Alexander M Popov
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | | | - Leonid I Saveliev
- Research Institute of Medical Cell Technologies, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation.,Regional Children's Hospital N1, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
| | - Godelieve A M Tytgat
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital (EKZ/AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Centre for Pediatric Oncology (PMC), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Larisa G Fechina
- Regional Children's Hospital N1, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Corrias MV, Parodi S, Tchirkov A, Lammens T, Vicha A, Pasqualini C, Träger C, Yáñez Y, Dallorso S, Varesio L, Luksch R, Laureys G, Valteau-Couanet D, Canete A, Pöetschger U, Ladenstein R, Burchill SA. Event-free survival of infants and toddlers enrolled in the HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial is associated with the level of neuroblastoma mRNAs at diagnosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27052. [PMID: 29603574 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether levels of neuroblastoma mRNAs in bone marrow and peripheral blood from stage M infants (≤12 months of age at diagnosis, MYCN amplified) and toddlers (between 12 and 18 months, any MYCN status) predict event-free survival (EFS). METHODS Bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood samples from 97 infants/toddlers enrolled in the European High-Risk Neuroblastoma trial were collected at diagnosis in PAXgene™ blood RNA tubes. Samples were analyzed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction according to standardized procedures. RESULTS Bone marrow tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) or paired-like homeobox 2b (PHOX2B) levels in the highest tertile were associated with worse EFS; hazard ratios, adjusted for age and MYCN status, were 1.5 and 1.8 respectively. Expression of both TH and PHOX2B in the highest tertile predicted worse outcome (p = 0.015), and identified 20 (23%) infants/toddlers with 5-year EFS of 20% (95%CI: 4%-44%). Prognostic significance was maintained after adjusting for over-fitting bias (p = 0.038), age and MYCN status. In peripheral blood, PHOX2B levels in the highest tertile predicted a two-fold increased risk of an event (p = 0.032), and identified 23 (34%) infants/toddlers with 5-year EFS of 29% (95%CI: 12%-48%). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed the prognostic value of combined TH and PHOX2B in bone marrow and of PHOX2B in peripheral blood during the first year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS High levels of bone marrow TH and PHOX2B and of peripheral blood PHOX2B at diagnosis allow early identification of a group of high-risk infant and toddlers with neuroblastoma who may be candidates for alternative treatments. Integration with additional biomarkers, as well as validation in additional international trials is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria V Corrias
- Unit of Experimental Therapy in Oncology, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Parodi
- Unit of Experimental Therapy in Oncology, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrei Tchirkov
- CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Cytogénétique Médicale and Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Tim Lammens
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ales Vicha
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Medical Faculty Charles University and Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Claudia Pasqualini
- Department of Child and Adolescent Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Catarina Träger
- Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yania Yáñez
- Oncología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Sandro Dallorso
- Unit of Experimental Therapy in Oncology, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luigi Varesio
- Unit of Experimental Therapy in Oncology, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Roberto Luksch
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Genevieve Laureys
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Adela Canete
- Oncología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ulrike Pöetschger
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, CCRI/St. Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruth Ladenstein
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, CCRI/St. Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susan A Burchill
- Children's Cancer Research Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang X, Wang L, Su Y, Yue Z, Xing T, Zhao W, Zhao Q, Duan C, Huang C, Zhang D, Jin M, Cheng X, Chen S, Liu Y, Ma X. Plasma cell-free DNA quantification is highly correlated to tumor burden in children with neuroblastoma. Cancer Med 2018; 7:3022-3030. [PMID: 29905010 PMCID: PMC6051223 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Revised: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a promising biomarker for neuroblastoma (NB) tumor burden. Seventy-nine eligible patients with newly diagnosed NB were recruited from Beijing Children's Hospital between April 2016 and April 2017. Additionally, from September 2011 to June 2017, 79 patients with stable NB were evaluated with a median follow-up time of 21 months. Approximately 2 mL of peripheral blood was drawn upon enrollment, and plasma cfDNA levels were measured via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Total cfDNA analysis was performed using the long interspersed nuclear element 1 (LINE-1) 79 bp fragment, and DNA integrity was calculated by the ratio of the LINE-1 300 bp fragment to the LINE-1 79 bp fragment. A total of 79 NB patients with a median age of 36 months comprised the group of newly diagnosed NB patients. The main primary tumor site was the retroperitoneal and adrenal region (81%). Three or more metastatic sites were found in 17.7% of patients. Stable NB patients older than 18 months comprised 98.7% of the stable NB patients. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and cfDNA levels were dramatically increased in the newly diagnosed NB patients and significantly different from those in the stable NB patients. Moreover, the concentration of cfDNA was much higher in patients with larger tumors. By analyzing the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), the areas of total cfDNA, NSE, and LDH levels were 0.953, 0.929, and 0.906, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity data clarified that the level of circulating cfDNA in plasma can be considered as a reliable biomarker for describing tumor load in NB. The plasma cfDNA concentration was as good as the levels of LDH and NSE to discriminate the tumor burden in children with NB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xisi Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lijun Wang
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company Limited, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Su
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhixia Yue
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Tianyu Xing
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Duan
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng Huang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dawei Zhang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Mei Jin
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xianfeng Cheng
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company Limited, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Shenglan Chen
- Taizhou Genewill Medical Laboratory Company Limited, Pharmaceutics City of China, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Beijing Keyin Technology Company, Beijing Keyin Evergreen Institutes for Medical Research Company Limited, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoli Ma
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, MOE Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Park JR, Bagatell R, Cohn SL, Pearson AD, Villablanca JG, Berthold F, Burchill S, Boubaker A, McHugh K, Nuchtern JG, London WB, Seibel NL, Lindwasser OW, Maris JM, Brock P, Schleiermacher G, Ladenstein R, Matthay KK, Valteau-Couanet D. Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: A Consensus Statement From the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2580-2587. [PMID: 28471719 PMCID: PMC5676955 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.72.0177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose More than two decades ago, an international working group established the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC) to assess treatment response in children with neuroblastoma. However, this system requires modification to incorporate modern imaging techniques and new methods for quantifying bone marrow disease that were not previously widely available. The National Cancer Institute sponsored a clinical trials planning meeting in 2012 to update and refine response criteria for patients with neuroblastoma. Methods Multidisciplinary investigators from 13 countries reviewed data from published trials performed through cooperative groups, consortia, and single institutions. Data from both prospective and retrospective trials were used to refine the INRC. Monthly international conference calls were held from 2011 to 2015, and consensus was reached through review by working group leadership and the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting leadership council. Results Overall response in the revised INRC will integrate tumor response in the primary tumor, soft tissue and bone metastases, and bone marrow. Primary and metastatic soft tissue sites will be assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and iodine-123 (123I) -metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scans or [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scans if the tumor is MIBG nonavid. 123I-MIBG scans, or [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scans for MIBG-nonavid disease, replace technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scintigraphy for osteomedullary metastasis assessment. Bone marrow will be assessed by histology or immunohistochemistry and cytology or immunocytology. Bone marrow with ≤ 5% tumor involvement will be classified as minimal disease. Urinary catecholamine levels will not be included in response assessment. Overall response will be defined as complete response, partial response, minor response, stable disease, or progressive disease. Conclusion These revised criteria will provide a uniform assessment of disease response, improve the interpretability of clinical trial results, and facilitate collaborative trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie R. Park
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rochelle Bagatell
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susan L. Cohn
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrew D. Pearson
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Judith G. Villablanca
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Frank Berthold
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susan Burchill
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ariane Boubaker
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kieran McHugh
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jed G. Nuchtern
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wendy B. London
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nita L. Seibel
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - O. Wolf Lindwasser
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - John M. Maris
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Penelope Brock
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gudrun Schleiermacher
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruth Ladenstein
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katherine K. Matthay
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dominique Valteau-Couanet
- Julie R. Park, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Rochelle Bagatell and John M. Maris, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Susan L. Cohn, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey; Susan Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James University Hospital, Leeds; Kieran McHugh and Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Judith G. Villablanca, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles; Katherine K. Matthay, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA; Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital and University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Ariane Boubaker, Institute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland; Jed G. Nuchtern, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Wendy B. London, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Nita L. Seibel and O. Wolf Lindwasser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Gudrun Schleiermacher, Institut Curie, Paris; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Luksch R, Castellani MR, Collini P, De Bernardi B, Conte M, Gambini C, Gandola L, Garaventa A, Biasoni D, Podda M, Sementa AR, Gatta G, Tonini GP. Neuroblastoma (Peripheral neuroblastic tumours). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 107:163-181. [PMID: 27823645 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Revised: 09/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Peripheral neuroblastic tumours (PNTs), a family of tumours arising in the embryonal remnants of the sympathetic nervous system, account for 7-10% of all tumours in children. In two-thirds of cases, PNTs originate in the adrenal glands or the retroperitoneal ganglia. At least one third present metastases at onset, with bone and bone marrow being the most frequent metastatic sites. Disease extension, MYCN oncogene status and age are the most relevant prognostic factors, and their influence on outcome have been considered in the design of the recent treatment protocols. Consequently, the probability of cure has increased significantly in the last two decades. In children with localised operable disease, surgical resection alone is usually a sufficient treatment, with 3-year event-free survival (EFS) being greater than 85%. For locally advanced disease, primary chemotherapy followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy yields an EFS of around 75%. The greatest problem is posed by children with metastatic disease or amplified MYCN gene, who continue to do badly despite intensive treatments. Ongoing trials are exploring the efficacy of new drugs and novel immunological approaches in order to save a greater number of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Luksch
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Paola Collini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Conte
- Giannina Gaslini Children's Research Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Lorenza Gandola
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Davide Biasoni
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Podda
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gemma Gatta
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Paolo Tonini
- Neuroblastoma Laboratory, Paediatric Research Institute, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Wezel EM, Decarolis B, Stutterheim J, Zappeij-Kannegieter L, Berthold F, Schumacher-Kuckelkorn R, Simon T, Fiocco M, van Noesel MM, Caron HN, van der Schoot CE, Hero B, Tytgat GAM. Neuroblastoma messenger RNA is frequently detected in bone marrow at diagnosis of localised neuroblastoma patients. Eur J Cancer 2016; 54:149-158. [PMID: 26796600 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2015] [Revised: 09/25/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The clinical importance of the detection of neuroblastoma messenger RNA (mRNA) in bone marrow (BM) of localised neuroblastoma patients at diagnosis remains unclear. In this prospective multicentre study, BM samples of a large cohort, were studied using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). METHODS BM samples at diagnosis from 160 patients with localised neuroblastoma were prospectively collected at Dutch and German centres between 2009 and 2013. qPCR was performed using five neuroblastoma specific markers. The association with other biological factors and the prognostic impact of BM positivity and clinical response was assessed. RESULTS In 58 out of 160 patients neuroblastoma mRNA was detected in BM. In 47 of the 58 positive samples only one marker was found positive. BM positivity was significantly associated with MYCN amplification (p = 0.02) and deletion of chromosome 1p (p = 0.04). In total 31 patients had an event, of which only five patients had progression to stage IV. BM positivity was not associated with an unfavourable outcome. However, the detection of more than one marker was associated with an unfavourable outcome (systemic or local relapse) (event free survival 48% versus 85%; p = 0.03) in the whole cohort and in the observation group. CONCLUSIONS BM positivity was associated with unfavourable biological factors and might represent more aggressive tumours. Patients with qPCR positive BM should not be upstaged, because of very few systemic events in the cohort. However, for patients with more than one marker positive a more careful follow-up is advisable. These results need to be verified in a very large cohort of localised patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther M van Wezel
- Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory of the AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boris Decarolis
- Children's Hospital, University of Cologne, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Germany
| | - Janine Stutterheim
- Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory of the AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lily Zappeij-Kannegieter
- Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory of the AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Berthold
- Children's Hospital, University of Cologne, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Simon
- Children's Hospital, University of Cologne, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Germany
| | - Marta Fiocco
- Department of Biostatistics, Leiden University Medical Center and Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Max M van Noesel
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Prinses Máxima Centrum, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Huib N Caron
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Ellen van der Schoot
- Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory of the AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara Hero
- Children's Hospital, University of Cologne, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Germany
| | - Godelieve A M Tytgat
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prinses Máxima Centrum, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|