1
|
Williams KM, Dougherty D, Plagens C, Shah NR, Tubbs D, Ehrlich PF. Limited English Proficiency can Negatively Impact Disease/Treatment in Children With Cancer Compared to Those Who are English Proficient-an Institutional Study. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59:800-803. [PMID: 38388287 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2013, 25.5 million people in the United States self-identified as having limited English proficiency (LEP). LEP in adults has been associated with longer hospital stays, increased adverse events, increased emergency room visits, and decreased understanding of medications prescribed. This study aims to define the relationship between LEP and outcomes in a pediatric oncologic population. METHODS We performed a matched case-control study utilizing data from our institutional cancer database (children = 18, 2012-2021). LEP families were matched by disease and stage with English proficient (EP) families. Descriptive, univariate, and bivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS Twenty-four LEP children were identified and matched with 77 EP children. LEP children represented 11 languages, with the most common being Spanish (42%). Statistical regression demonstrated a clinically significant trend for LEP children to have an increased mean number of unexpected hospital admissions (p = 0.04), increased number of clinic cancellations (n = 0.003), and increased emergency department visits (p = 0.05). LEP children were more likely to have Medicaid than commercial insurance (p < 0.001). There was no difference in 2-year event free or overall survival. CONCLUSION In our study cohort, LEP families are at risk for more negative treatment experiences than EP families. Further studies are needed to delineate specific causes and interventions. TYPE OF STUDY Retrospective comparative cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keyonna M Williams
- University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Danielle Dougherty
- University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Connor Plagens
- University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nikhil R Shah
- University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Darrell Tubbs
- University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Peter F Ehrlich
- University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nabukalu D, Gordon LG, Lowe J, Merollini KMD. Healthcare costs of cancer among children, adolescents, and young adults: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6925. [PMID: 38214042 PMCID: PMC10905233 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To collate and critically review international evidence on the direct health system costs of children and adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer. METHODS We conducted searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus. Articles were limited to studies involving people aged 0-39 years at cancer diagnosis and published from 2012 to 2022. Two reviewers screened the articles and evaluated the studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. The reviewers synthesized the findings using a narrative approach and presented the costs in 2022 US dollars for comparability. RESULTS Overall, the mean healthcare costs for all cancers in the 5 years post diagnosis ranged from US$36,670 among children in Korea to US$127,946 among AYA in the USA. During the first year, the mean costs among children 0-14 years ranged from US$34,953 in Chile to over US$130,000 in Canada. These were higher than the costs for AYA, estimated at US$61,855 in Canada. At the end of life, the mean costs were estimated at over US$300,000 among children and US$235,265 among adolescents in Canada. Leukemia was the most expensive cancer type, estimated at US$50,133 in Chile, to US$152,533 among children in Canada. Overall, more than a third of the total cost is related to hospitalizations. All the included studies were of good quality. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare costs associated with cancer are substantial among children, and AYA. More research is needed on the cost of cancer in low- and middle-income countries and harmonization of costs across countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doreen Nabukalu
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
- Population Health ProgramQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteHerstonQueenslandAustralia
| | - Louisa G. Gordon
- Population Health ProgramQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteHerstonQueenslandAustralia
- School of NursingQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveQueenslandAustralia
- School of Public HealthThe University of QueenslandHerstonQueenslandAustralia
| | - John Lowe
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
| | - Katharina M. D. Merollini
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
- Sunshine Coast Health InstituteSunshine Coast University HospitalBirtinyaQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prather CS, Wood JB, Mueller EL, Christenson JC, Alali M. The Yield, Safety, and Cost-effectiveness of Decreasing Repeat Blood Cultures Beyond 48 Hours in a Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Unit. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2023; 45:409-415. [PMID: 37526364 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000002711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Clear recommendations are needed on when repeat blood cultures (BCxs) in hospitalized children with cancer should be obtained. We reviewed all BCx obtained on the Hematology-Oncology Unit at Riley Hospital for Children, regardless of reason for patient admission or neutropenia status, between January 2015 and February 2021. Patients with positive BCx within 48 hours of initial cultures, history of stem cell transplant, or admitted to the intensive care unit were excluded. Medical records of patients with new positive BCx drawn >48 hours after initial BCx were reviewed. Seven (1.2%) hospitalization episodes grew new pathogens, or commensals treated as pathogens, on cultures beyond 48 hours. All patients with new, true pathogens were hemodynamically unstable or had recurrent fever when the new positive BCx was obtained. Twenty-three (4.0%) hospitalization episodes had contaminant cultures beyond 48 hours, with 74 (5.4%) of 1362 BCx collected beyond 48 hours being contaminated, resulting in an additional cost of $210,519 from increased length of stay. In conclusion, repeat BCx beyond 48 hours in pediatric hematology-oncology patients with negative initial cultures are low yield and costly. Repeat BCx can be safely and cost-effectively ceased after 48 hours of negative cultures in hemodynamically and clinically stable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James B Wood
- Ryan White Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Comparative Effectiveness Research
| | - Emily L Mueller
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Section of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Muayad Alali
- Ryan White Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borrescio-Higa F, Valdés N. The Psychosocial Burden of Families with Childhood Blood Cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19010599. [PMID: 35010854 PMCID: PMC8744617 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death for children, and leukemias are the most common pediatric cancer diagnoses in Chile. Childhood cancer is a traumatic experience and is associated with distress, pain, and other negative experiences for patients and their families. Thus, psychosocial costs represent a large part of the overall burden of cancer. This study examines psychosocial experiences in a sample of 90 families of children with blood-related cancer in Chile. We provide a global overview of the family experience, focusing on patients, caregivers, and siblings. We find that most families report a negative impact upon diagnosis; disruptions in family dynamics; a range of negative feelings of the patient, such as depression, discouragement, and irritability; and difficulty with social lives. Additionally, they report negative effects in the relationship between the siblings of the patient and their parents, and within their caregivers' spouse/partner relationship, as well as a worsening of the economic condition of the primary caregiver. Furthermore, over half of the families in the sample had to move due to diagnosis and/or treatment. Promoting interventions that can help patients, siblings, and parents cope with distress and promote resilience and well-being are important.
Collapse
|
5
|
Picca A, Wahlquist AE, Hudspeth M. Incorporating Absolute Phagocyte Count With Absolute Neutrophil Count as a Measure for Safe Discharge for Pediatric Oncology Febrile Neutropenia: A Pilot Study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2021; 43:e1000-e1002. [PMID: 33065712 PMCID: PMC8046833 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Adequate bone marrow recovery is a discharge requirement after admission for febrile neutropenia in oncology patients, without specific threshold in consensus guidelines. In January 2016, our institution implemented count recovery criteria of absolute neutrophil count ≥100 cells/μL and absolute phagocyte count ≥300 cells/μL compared with prior criteria of absolute neutrophil count ≥500 cells/μL. Retrospective analysis comparing pre (July 2013 to December 2015, N=68) and post (January 2016 to June 2018, N=30) groups showed no difference in readmissions (P>0.9), no patient deaths, and decreased average length of stay in the post group (P<0.0001). Updated count recovery criteria seem feasible and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Picca
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Amy E. Wahlquist
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center & South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Michelle Hudspeth
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Medical Cost of Cancer Care for Privately Insured Children in Chile. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18136746. [PMID: 34201571 PMCID: PMC8267683 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18136746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Medical care for children with cancer is complex and expensive, and represents a large financial burden for families around the world. We estimated the medical cost of cancer care for children under the age of 18, using administrative records of the universe of children with private insurance in Chile in the period 2007–2018, based on a sample of 3853 observations. We analyzed total cost and out-of-pocket spending by patients’ characteristics, type of cancer, and by service. Children with cancer had high annual medical costs, USD 32,287 on average for 2018. Costs were higher for the younger children in the sample. The vast majority of the cost was driven by inpatient hospital care for all types of cancer. The average total cost increased 20% in real terms over the period of study, while out-of-pocket expenses increased almost 29%. Private insurance beneficiaries faced a significant economic burden associated with medical treatment of a child with cancer. Interventions that reduce hospitalizations, as well as systemwide reforms that incorporate maximum out-of-pocket payments and prevent catastrophic expenditures, can contribute to alleviating the financial burden of childhood cancer.
Collapse
|
7
|
McBride ML, de Oliveira C, Duncan R, Bremner KE, Liu N, Greenberg ML, Nathan PC, Rogers PC, Peacock SJ, Krahn MD. Comparing Childhood Cancer Care Costs in Two Canadian Provinces. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 15:76-88. [PMID: 32176612 PMCID: PMC7075448 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: Cancer in children presents unique issues for diagnosis, treatment and survivorship care. Phase-specific comparative cost estimates are important for informing healthcare planning. Objectives: The aim of this paper is to compare direct medical costs of childhood cancer by phase of care in British Columbia (BC) and Ontario (ON). Methods: For cancer patients diagnosed at <15 years of age and propensity-score-matched non-cancer controls, we applied standard costing methodology using population-based healthcare administrative data to estimate and compare phase-based costs by province. Results: Phase-specific cancer-attributable costs were 2%–39% higher for ON than for BC. Leukemia pre-diagnosis costs and annual lymphoma continuing care costs were >50% higher in ON. Phase-specific in-patient hospital costs (the major cost category) represented 63%–82% of ON costs, versus 43%–73% of BC costs. Phase-specific diagnostic tests and procedures accounted for 1.0%–3.4% of ON costs and 2.8%–13.0% of BC costs. Conclusions: There are substantial cost differences between these two Canadian provinces, BC and ON, possibly identifying opportunities for healthcare planning improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary L McBride
- Emerita Scientist, Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - Claire de Oliveira
- Independent Scientist and Health Economist, Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON
| | - Ross Duncan
- Graduate Student, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Karen E Bremner
- Research Associate, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - Ning Liu
- Senior Research Analyst, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
| | - Mark L Greenberg
- Chair in Childhood Cancer Control and Professor of Paediatrics and Surgery, Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | - Paul C Nathan
- Staff Oncologist and Director, Aftercare Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON
| | - Paul C Rogers
- Clinical Professor, Division of Hematology, Oncology & Bone Marrow Transplant, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC
| | - Stuart J Peacock
- Distinguished Scientist, Leslie Diamond Chair in Cancer Survivorship, Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - Murray D Krahn
- Senior Scientist and Director, THETA Collaborative, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mueller EL, Cochrane AR, Lynch DO, Cockrum BP, Wiehe SE. Identifying patient-centered outcomes for children with cancer and their caregivers when they seek care in the emergency department. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27903. [PMID: 31309720 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with cancer have high utilization of the emergency department (ED), but little is known about which outcomes are most important to them and their caregivers when they seek care in the ED. PROCEDURE A qualitative evaluation of ED experience for children with cancer and their caregivers was performed using self-reported interactive toolkits. Eligible participants included children with cancer (ages 11-19) and caregivers of children with cancer whose child received cancer therapy within the last year and had an ED visit within the last 2 years. Eligible participants received toolkits by mail and received incentives if they completed the toolkit. Toolkits were transcribed, thematically coded, and iteratively analyzed using Nvivo 11.0 software. RESULTS There were 26 toolkits received-seven by children aged 11-17 years and 19 by caregivers (11 with children aged 2-7 years, eight with children aged 11-17 years). About half were from within 1 h of their treating institution. The most important outcomes to this population included system-level issues (eg, cleanliness of space, timeliness of evaluation) and oncology-provider- and ED-provider-level issues (eg, ability to access port-a-caths, quality of communication). Participants also identified outcomes that were within the control of the patient/caregiver, such as improving their sense of preparedness. CONCLUSION The important outcomes to children with cancer and their caregivers when they seek care in the ED are distinct from current quality metrics. Future research should focus on the development and validation of a patient-centered outcomes tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily L Mueller
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Comparative Effectiveness Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.,Section of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Anneli R Cochrane
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Comparative Effectiveness Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.,Section of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Dustin O Lynch
- Community Health Partnerships Patient Engagement Core, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Brandon P Cockrum
- Community Health Partnerships Patient Engagement Core, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sarah E Wiehe
- Community Health Partnerships Patient Engagement Core, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.,Children's Health Services Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nathan PC, Bremner KE, Liu N, Gupta S, Greenberg ML, McBride ML, Krahn MD, de Oliveira C. Resource Utilization and Costs in Adolescents Treated for Cancer in Pediatric vs Adult Institutions. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111:322-330. [PMID: 30053118 PMCID: PMC6410950 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescents with cancer can receive care in pediatric or adult institutions. Survival often differs by locus, but little is known about relative health care utilization and costs. We estimated these in a population-based cohort of adolescents. METHODS All Ontario adolescents (15.0-17.9 years) diagnosed with cancer between 1995 and 2010 were identified from provincial cancer registries. We compared health care resource utilization (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, same-day surgeries, outpatient chemotherapy, radiation, diagnostic/laboratory tests, physician services, home care) and costs (2012 Canadian dollars) during four discrete care phases-prediagnosis (60 days), initial (360 days), continuing (variable), and terminal (360 days)-between adolescents treated in pediatric vs adult institutions, for the whole cohort and within seven diagnostic categories. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Of 1356 eligible adolescents, 691 and 665 were treated in adult and pediatric institutions, respectively. Hospitalization rates were higher in pediatric institutions during prediagnosis (14.9% vs 6.9%, P < .001), initial (95.1% vs 73.3%, P < .001), and continuing phases (43.2% vs 34.4%, P = .002), but similar (96.1% vs 96.3%, P = .93) during the terminal phase. Average length of stay was higher at pediatric institutions within most diagnoses and phases. For all diagnoses, median initial phase costs were higher in pediatric than adult institutions (eg, leukemia: $153 926 vs $102 418 per 360 days, P < .001; lymphoma: $65 025 vs $19 846, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The costs of caring for adolescents with the same malignancy are considerably higher in pediatric than adult institutions during most phases. Resource utilization, particularly hospitalization, drives much of the cost difference, making these data applicable to other jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Nathan
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karen E Bremner
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ning Liu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sumit Gupta
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark L Greenberg
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary L McBride
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Murray D Krahn
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Claire de Oliveira
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Decreasing Door-to-Door Times for Infliximab Infusions in a Children's Hospital Observation Unit. Pediatr Qual Saf 2019; 4:e131. [PMID: 30937413 PMCID: PMC6426496 DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Introduction: Children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often require infliximab infusions to manage their disease. Infusions administered in the hospital setting require the patient and their families to devote many hours away from home. Changing to a rapid infusion protocol has been shown in the literature to be safe and has the potential to decrease time spent in the hospital receiving infusions. Methods: We describe stepwise changes made over a 4-month period to improve infliximab infusion efficiency and lessen the time spent in the hospital by IBD patients and their families. These changes included the implementation of a standardized order set, defaulting to rapid infusions for eligible patients, eliminating the post-infusion observation window, and improving the pharmacy's efficiency in preparing infusion medications. We utilized several established quality improvement tools, including a smart aim, key driver diagram, plan-do-study-act cycles, and statistical process control charts to measure these interventions. Results: Within three months of starting, the average door-to-door time patients spent in the hospital decreased by 128 minutes (2 hours 8 minutes). This improvement amounts to 768 minutes (12 hours 48 minutes) per year of time returned for normal childhood activities outside of the hospital. There were no infusion reactions during the period monitored. Conclusions: Implementation of a rapid infliximab infusion protocol made an impressive impact on freed family time without sacrificing patient safety. The changes we implemented could be helpful to other centers interested in decreasing in-hospital time for patients with IBD and their families.
Collapse
|