Health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer - Including a focus on economic evaluation

Comprehensive health status and health-related quality of life of children at diagnosis of high-risk neuroblastoma: a multicentric pilot study

BACKGROUND

Neuroblastomas account for 8-10 % of all cancer diagnoses among children. Most patients present with advanced, high-risk disease and 90 % are less than five years old. The burden of morbidity and mortality is high and is quantifiable by measures of health-related quality of life (HRQL). Measuring quality of life in under five-year-old children is a particular challenge that has been met with the development of the Health Utilities Pre-School (HuPS) instrument. Quality of life studies in children with cancer are scarce in low- and middle-income countries and are usually conducted at a single center, thus limiting any conclusions drawn. This pilot study aimed to assess the health-related quality of life of children at the time of diagnosis of high-risk neuroblastomas.

METHOD

This prospective cross-sectional multicentric study assessed the quality of life of children with high-risk neuroblastoma. The Health Utilities Pre-School instrument was applied to under five-year-olds, and the related Health Utilities Index Mark 3 instrument to over five-year olds.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven patients participated in this study. There was a high burden of morbidity at diagnosis, often equating to severe disability, indicative of states of health with scores worse than being dead in two under five-year-old children.

CONCLUSION

The results of the current study will help to set research priorities for subsequent investigations and provide a basis to improve supportive care for children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Rehabilitation interventions for young adult cancer survivors: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To map existing research concerning rehabilitation interventions for young adult cancer survivors (YACS) that address at least one factor from the biopsychosocial health model.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane in January 2022 and updated in March 2023, and grey literature between February and April 2022.

METHODS

The review followed Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for scoping reviews. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies evaluating interventions for YACS of any cancer who had completed primary treatment and were between 18 and 39 years old at diagnosis were included. Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, and standardised forms were used for data extraction. Descriptive statistics, narrative summaries and thematic analysis were used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

The search revealed 5706 records, of which 70 were full-text screened. The 20 included studies represented a heterogeneous group of 444 young adults with different cancer types, mean age above 25, and an overrepresentation of females. Most studies were feasibility and pilot studies. The 20 studies consisted of 14 unique interventions focusing primarily on one dimension of the biopsychosocial health model like biological or psychological factors. In the 14 interventions, the most frequent intervention element was peer-to-peer support (n = 12). The interventions were often delivered online (n = 9), lasting 3-12 months (n = 8). A wide variety of theories, providers and outcome measures were used.

CONCLUSION

The results show that current research on multicomponent, biopsychosocial and age-specific rehabilitation for YACS remains at an early stage.

The relationship between unmet cancer care needs and self-rated health among adolescents and young adults with cancer

BACKGROUND

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer face unique psychosocial challenges that often impact their outcomes, including self-rated health. To date, few studies have focused on AYA cancer survivors' multidimensional unmet needs of cancer care in relation to their health status.

METHODS/PROCEDURE

This study surveyed 324 AYA cancer survivors in a cross-sectional design using the Cancer Needs Questionnaire - Young People (CNQ-YP). In addition to descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations, multinomial logistic regressions were used for analysis.

RESULTS

AYA cancer survivors' daily life needs were found to be significantly and negatively associated with self-rated health, OR = 0.910, 95% CI 0.843, 0.983, p < 0.01, and OR = 0.888, 95% CI 0.818, 0.966, p < 0.01. In addition, the unmet work needs were significantly and positively associated with participants' self-rated health, OR = 1.207, 95% CI 1.003, 1.452, p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Moving beyond simply describing the unique psychosocial needs confronting AYA cancer survivors, this study empirically identified two specific dimensions of unmet needs of AYA cancer survivors that were significantly correlated to their SRH, both of which should be considered in future service and intervention research to support AYAs with cancer.