SIOP PODC adapted risk stratification and treatment guidelines: Recommendations for acute myeloid leukemia in resource-limited settings

Cost-effectiveness of treating childhood acute myeloid leukemia at a tertiary care center in North India

INTRODUCTION

Childhood cancers are a significant global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where over 80% of childhood cancer patients reside. In India, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) constitutes a significant portion of childhood cancers; however, the data on the cost-effectiveness of childhood AML treatment in India and other LMICs remain limited.

METHODS

The study focused on children (<15 years of age) diagnosed with AML at a tertiary care cancer center in North India. Data, including treatment outcome, treatment-related morbidity, mortality, and costs were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical record and hospital database. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using disability-adjusted life years (DALY) averted in relation to the country-specific cost-effectiveness threshold.

RESULTS

Among 59 AML patients, treatment-related high mortality rates, abandonment, and limited access to bone marrow transplantation were notable challenges. Intensive chemotherapy resulted in substantial sepsis-related complications, with treatment-related mortality reaching 30%. The 3-year event-free survival and overall survival of the 43 patients who received intensive therapy were 24.5% ± 7.6% and 27.9% ± 8.3%, respectively. Despite these challenges, treating childhood AML was still found to be cost-effective. The total cost per newly diagnosed patient treated with curative intent was $4454. Cost per DALY averted accounted for 24% of the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, rendering the treatment to be cost-effective with a stringent cost-effectiveness threshold utilized.

CONCLUSION

The study underscores the challenges faced while treating childhood AML in LMICs, including treatment-induced high sepsis-related mortality and abandonment. Despite these challenges, it remains cost-effective to treat childhood AML in India. Future efforts should focus on reducing treatment-related morbidity and mortality to further improve outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Childhood cancer care beyond the 'six common and curable types': A comparative case series on acute myeloid leukemia in Kenya and the Netherlands

Annually, over 400,000 children develop cancer, with the majority living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Survival rates in high-income countries (HICs; ≥ 75%-80%) significantly exceed those in LMICs (< 30%). Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a childhood cancer with high mortality rates in LMICs and is not included in the World Health Organization (WHO)'s 'six common and curable types of cancer'. This case report explores two pediatric AML cases in Kenya (LMIC) and the Netherlands (HIC), highlighting differences and similarities in both patient journeys. The first case is a 15-year-old Kenyan boy who initially experienced dizziness and fatigue. After repeated blood transfusions without a definitive diagnosis, AML was confirmed via bone marrow aspiration (BMA) 63 days later, and treatment followed the SIOP PODC AML guidelines for LMICs. The second case is a 6-year-old Dutch boy with fatigue and malaise. Initially diagnosed with post-viral bone marrow failure, a BMA performed 61 days after symptom onset revealed AML, and treatment followed the NOPHO-DBH AML-2012 protocol. Both patients faced frequent febrile neutropenia, managed per local guidelines, illustrating the balance between anti-cancer treatment and supportive care. Despite challenges, both boys completed treatment and are in complete remission. This case series highlights the potential for effective AML treatment in resource-constrained settings and underscores the need to address cancers beyond the 'six common and curable types'.

Factors influencing treatment decision-making for cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review

PURPOSE

In this scoping review, we evaluated existing literature related to factors influencing treatment decision-making for patients diagnosed with cancer in low- and middle-income countries, noting factors that influence decisions to pursue treatment with curative versus non-curative intent. We identified an existing framework for adult cancer developed in a high-income country (HIC) context and described similar and novel factors relevant to low-and middle-income country settings.

METHODS

We used scoping review methodology to identify and synthesize existing literature on factors influencing decision-making for pediatric and adult cancer in these settings. Articles were identified through an advanced Boolean search across six databases, inclusive of all article types from inception through July 2022.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine articles were identified from 22 countries across six regions, primarily reporting the experiences of lower-middle and upper-middle-income countries. Included articles largely represented original research (54%), adult cancer populations (61%), and studied patients as the targeted population (51%). More than a quarter of articles focused exclusively on breast cancer (28%). Approximately 30% described factors that influenced decisions to choose between therapies with curative versus non-curative intent. Of 56 reported factors, 22 novel factors were identified. Socioeconomic status, reimbursement policies/cost of treatment, and treatment and supportive care were the most commonly described factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review expanded upon previously described factors that influence cancer treatment decision-making in HICs, broadening knowledge to include perspectives of low- and middle-income countries. While global commonalities exist, certain variables influence treatment choices differently or uniquely in different settings. Treatment regimens should further be tailored to local environments with consideration of contextual factors and accessible resources that often impact decision-making.

Treatment outcomes of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia in Western Kenya before and after the implementation of the SIOP PODC treatment guideline

PURPOSE

The Pediatric Oncology in Developing Countries (PODC) committee of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) published a pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-specific adapted treatment guideline for low- and middle-income countries. We evaluated the outcomes of children with AML at a large Kenyan academic hospital before (period 1) and after (period 2) implementing this guideline.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of children (≤17 years) newly diagnosed with AML between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively studied. In period 1, induction therapy comprised two courses with doxorubicin and cytarabine, and consolidation comprised two courses with etoposide and cytarabine. In period 2, a prephase with intravenous low-dose etoposide was administered prior to induction therapy, induction course I was intensified, and consolidation was adapted to two high-dose cytarabine courses. Probabilities of event-free survival (pEFS) and overall survival (pOS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

One-hundred twenty-two children with AML were included - 83 in period 1 and 39 in period 2. Overall, 95 patients received chemotherapy. The abandonment rate was 19% (16/83) in period 1 and 3% (1/39) in period 2. The early death, treatment-related mortality, complete remission, and relapse rates in periods 1 and 2 were 46% (29/63) versus 44% (14/32), 36% (12/33) versus 47% (8/17), 33% (21/63) versus 38% (12/32), and 57% (12/21) versus 17% (2/12), respectively. The 2-year pEFS and pOS in periods 1 and 2 were 5% versus 15% (p = .53), and 8% versus 16% (p = .93), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of the SIOP PODC guideline did not result in improved outcomes of Kenyan children with AML. Survival of these children remains dismal, mainly attributable to early mortality.

One-Year Survival and Prognosticators of Adults With Acute Leukemia at the Uganda Cancer Institute

PURPOSE

Acute leukemias are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in the adult population. Despite an increasing burden of acute leukemia in developing countries, there are limited data on clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in this setting. In this study, we aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, survival, and prognostic factors of adults with acute leukemia at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2009 and December 2018, reviewing data of patients 18 years or older with a cytopathologic diagnosis of acute leukemia at UCI. Data were extracted on clinical and laboratory characteristics, response to treatment, and survival. Cox-proportional hazards regression and survival analysis were performed to determine survival rates and associated factors. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In total, 233 participants were enrolled. Most (59.2%. n = 138) participants were male, with a median age of 32 years (IQR, 23-48 years), and 136 (58.4%) had AML. Overall, the 1-year survival was 16.5%, with a median survival time of 47 (IQR, 21-219) days. Predictors of mortality were being a female (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.7; P = .022) and overweight (aHR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 13.4; P = .015). Among the patients who had AML, the predictors were poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG; aHR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.2; P = .001) and HIV (aHR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.7 to 20.5; P = .004). Among the patients who had ALL, the predictors were poor ECOG (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.1; P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Patients with acute leukemia in Uganda have poor overall survival. Prospective studies are recommended to better understand causes of early mortality.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Malignancy Diagnosis and Treatment: Never the Same but Lessons Learned

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic affected the pediatric oncology population globally. Over the course of 2 years, increasing reports have been made to better understand this entity and its pathologic complications on these patients. The pandemic has allowed healthcare providers, hospital systems, and leading oncologic societies to quickly adapt and formulate new guidelines for the effective understanding, management, and treatment of patients with pediatric malignancy.

Two-drug versus three-drug induction chemotherapy in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized controlled trial

The benefit of three-drug induction chemotherapy over a two-drug induction has not been evaluated in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We, therefore, conducted a randomized controlled trial to ascertain the benefit of a three-drug induction regimen. Patients aged 1–18 years with newly diagnosed AML were randomized to two cycles of induction chemotherapy with daunorubicin and ara-C (DA) or two cycles of ara-C, daunorubicin, and etoposide (ADE). After induction, patients in both arms received consolidation with two cycles of high-dose ara-C. The study’s primary objective was to compare the event-free survival (EFS) between the two arms. The secondary objectives included comparing the composite complete remission (cCR) rates, overall survival (OS), and toxicities. The study randomized 149 patients, 77 in the DA and 72 in the ADE arm. The median age was 8.7 years, and 92 (62%) patients were males. The median follow-up was 50.9 months. The cCR rate in the DA and ADE arm were 82% and 79% (p = 0.68) after the second induction. There were 13 (17%) induction deaths in the DA arm and 12 (17%) in the ADE arm (p = 0.97). The 5-year EFS in the DA and ADE arm was 34.4% and 34.5%, respectively (p = 0.66). The 5-year OS in the DA and ADE arms was 41.4% and 42.09%, respectively (p = 0.74). There were no significant differences in toxicities between the regimens. There was no statistically significant difference in EFS, OS, CR, or toxicity between ADE and DA regimens in pediatric AML. The trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (Reference number: CTRI/2014/11/005202).

Clinical review of COVID-19 in children and adolescents with cancer: Experience from a tertiary care center in East India

Children with underlying cancer are often immunocompromised. Data on severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children with cancer and its outcomes is emerging. Treatment protocols of specific cancers are decided based on the infrastructure, availability of supportive-care, and logistic issues of the locality. The purpose of the study was clinical analysis of COVID-19 in children and adolescents with cancer. The retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare-center in East India. Children and adolescents (aged 0-19 years) with cancer and under treatment with reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed COVID-19 between 5-July-2020 and 5-December-2020 were studied. Median age of the 68 identified patients was six years. Acute leukemia was the most common (66%) diagnosis. COVID-19 was asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic in 91% and moderate to severe in only 9% of patients. Fever (87%) was the commonest symptom, followed-by cough/coryza (75%). Three patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and severe/critical COVID-19 and associated neutropenic sepsis were required transfer to the intensive-care-unit (ICU) for management. Three (4.4%) patients succumbed with COVID-19. Delay in treatment was observed in 63.2% of patients, and the median duration of delay was 28 days after acquiring COVID-19. Median time to attain negative COVID-19 RT-PCR was 16 days, and eight patients were repeat positives. While pediatric and adolescent cancer patients on active treatment may have a higher risk of mortality from severe COVID-19 than their healthy counterparts, the risk may be much lower than deemed. It is essential to continue cancer therapy in these children. Delay in treatment remains a concern.

A systematic review of modeling and simulation approaches in designing targeted treatment technologies for Leukemia Cancer in low and middle income countries

Virtual experimentation is a widely used approach for predicting systems behaviour especially in situations where resources for physical experiments are very limited. For example, targeted treatment inside the human body is particularly challenging, and as such, modeling and simulation is utilised to aid planning before a specific treatment is administered. In such approaches, precise treatment, as it is the case in radiotherapy, is used to administer a maximum dose to the infected regions while minimizing the effect on normal tissue. Complicated cancers such as leukemia present even greater challenges due to their presentation in liquid form and not being localised in one area. As such, science has led to the development of targeted drug delivery, where the infected cells can be specifically targeted anywhere in the body. Despite the great prospects and advances of these modeling and simulation tools in the design and delivery of targeted drugs, their use by Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) researchers and clinicians is still very limited. This paper therefore reviews the modeling and simulation approaches for leukemia treatment using nanoparticles as an example for virtual experimentation. A systematic review from various databases was carried out for studies that involved cancer treatment approaches through modeling and simulation with emphasis to data collected from LMICs. Results indicated that whereas there is an increasing trend in the use of modeling and simulation approaches, their uptake in LMICs is still limited. According to the review data collected, there is a clear need to employ these tools as key approaches for the planning of targeted drug treatment approaches.

Evaluation of reporting quality in clinical practice guidelines for acute myeloid leukemia using the RIGHT checklist

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematologic malignancy. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the management of AML have great value in clinical practice. However, the reporting quality of CPGs for AML has not yet been evaluated. This is the first study aiming to evaluate the reporting quality of the most recent AML CPGs published worldwide using the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) to extract CPGs for AML published between January 2016 and December 2020. Websites for guideline development organizations and medical associations were also searched. Two independent researchers assessed compliance of the guidelines to each of the 35 checklist items and summarized reporting rates for the 7 domains of the RIGHT checklist.

RESULTS

We identified 16 guidelines, of which 3 (18.8%) were written in Chinese and 13 (81.3%) were written in English. The average overall reporting rate of the 16 guidelines was 52.9%, and only 7 CPGs (43.8%) had a reporting rate >50%. The average reporting rates of the 7 domains (basic information; background; evidence; recommendations; review and quality assurance; funding, declaration, and management of interests; and other information) were 79.2%, 62.5%, 38.8%, 53.6%, 21.9%, 32.8%, and 43.8%, respectively. For the 35 checklist items, the average reporting rate was 52.9%, and only 16 items had a reporting rate >50%, of which 5 items were reported by all the guidelines. There was 1 item which was not reported by any of the guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The reporting quality of recently published AML guidelines remains poor. While the recommendations of CPGs have great value in clinical practice, the reporting quality of CPGs for AML still needs to be improved.

Minimally myelosuppressive regimen for remission induction in pediatric AML: long-term results of an observational study

Treatment refusal and death as a result of toxicity account for most treatment failures among children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in resource-constrained settings. We recently reported the results of treating children with AML with a combination of low-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone or omacetaxine mepesuccinate with concurrent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (low-dose chemotherapy [LDC]) for remission induction followed by standard postremission strategies. We have now expanded the initial cohort and have provided long-term follow-up. Eighty-three patients with AML were treated with the LDC regimen. During the study period, another 100 children with AML received a standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC) regimen. Complete remission was attained in 88.8% and 86.4% of patients after induction in the LDC and SDC groups, respectively (P = .436). Twenty-two patients in the LDC group received SDC for the second induction course. Significantly more high-risk AML patients were treated with the SDC regimen (P = .035). There were no significant differences between the LDC and SDC groups in 5-year event-free survival (61.4% ± 8.7% vs 65.2% ± 7.4%, respectively; P = .462), overall survival (72.7% ± 6.9% vs 72.5% ± 6.2%, respectively; P = .933), and incidence of relapse (20.5% ± 4.5% vs 17.6% ± 3.9%, respectively; P = .484). Clearance of mutations based on the average variant allele frequency at complete remission in the LDC and SDC groups was 1.9% vs 0.6% (P < .001) after induction I and 0.17% vs 0.078% (P = .052) after induction II. In conclusion, our study corroborated the high remission rate reported for children with AML who received at least 1 course of LDC. The results, although preliminary, also suggest that long-term survival of these children is comparable to that of children who receive SDC regimens.

Outcome of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature

Introduction: Survival rates of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) seem extremely poor, and the available literature on the matter is scarce. Accordingly, there is a limited understanding of poor treatment outcomes seen in this population.Areas covered: We provide an overview of the available literature with respect to treatment outcomes of pediatric AML in LMICs yielding poor outcomes compared to high-income countries. Moreover, treatment outcomes vary markedly between LMICs. In addition, there is a wide variation among studies in how treatment outcomes are reported and analyzed.Expert opinion: The substantially inferior treatment outcomes of pediatric AML in LMICs emphasize the unprecedented importance of global initiatives and international collaborations to improve the survival of these patients. A coordinated approach is necessary to carry out country-specific situational analyses. These analyses will result in operational plans on how to structurally implement childhood cancer registries, align healthcare infrastructure, build on capacities, and provide universal health coverage in LMICs. In addition, we strongly recommend that, in the future, LMICs document, analyze, and publish pediatric AML treatment outcomes in a more structured and uniform manner.

Clinical and organizational risk factors for mortality during deterioration events among pediatric oncology patients in Latin America: A multicenter prospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized pediatric hematology-oncology (PHO) patients have frequent clinical deterioration events (CDE) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, particularly in resource-limited settings. The objective of this study was to describe CDEs in hospitalized PHO patients in Latin America and to identify event-level and center-level risk factors for mortality.

METHODS

In 2017, the authors implemented a prospective registry of CDEs, defined as unplanned transfers to a higher level of care, use of ICU-level interventions on the floor, or nonpalliative floor deaths, in 16 PHO centers in 10 countries. PHO hospital admissions and hospital inpatient days were also reported. This study analyzes the first year of registry data (June 2017 to May 2018).

RESULTS

Among 16 centers, 553 CDEs were reported in PHO patients during 11,536 admissions and 119,414 inpatient days (4.63 per 1000 inpatient days). Event mortality was 29% (1.33 per 1000 inpatient days) but ranged widely across centers (11%-79% or 0.36-5.80 per 1000 inpatient days). Significant risk factors for event mortality included requiring any ICU-level intervention on the floor and not being transferred to a higher level of care. Events with organ dysfunction, a higher severity of illness, and a requirement for ICU intervention had higher mortality. In center-level analysis, hospitals with a higher volume of PHO patients, less floor use of ICU intervention, lower severity of illness on transfer, and lower rates of floor cardiopulmonary arrest had lower event mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalized PHO patients who experience CDEs in resource-limited settings frequently require floor-based ICU interventions and have high mortality. Modifiable hospital practices around the escalation of care for these high-risk patients may contribute to poor outcomes. Earlier recognition of critical illness and timely ICU transfer may improve survival in hospitalized children with cancer.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Children: Challenges and Opportunities : Based on 7th Dr. I. C. Verma Excellence Award for Young Pediatricians Delivered as Oration on 29th Sept. 2019

Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is an effective therapy for children and adolescents with chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). For the majority of patients with CML in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), imatinib is the TKI of choice for reasons of cost, availability, and experience. Children are exposed to therapy for a greater proportion of their lifetime as compared to adults. The adverse effects of prolonged administration of TKI is a subject of ongoing research, as more experience is collected. Therapy with TKI is currently considered to be life-long. Trials on stopping treatment are ongoing to explore if it may be feasible in selected patients, as reported in adults. Growth-failure is a concerning adverse effect. Currently, it seems unclear if the final height attained is within the expected range of the mid-parenteral height and growth standards. Whether the children will achieve a normal height at the end of their growth potential or remain below the predicted range is critical to decide if therapeutic interventions (E.g., growth hormone therapy, or interruption in TKI) should be considered during the period of growth potential. Research on CML in children is at a relatively slow pace, largely due to the rarity of the disease. This provides a unique opportunity for research in population-dense LMICs, as several tertiary centers tend to have a sizable cohort of children and adolescents with CML on follow-up. This narrative summarises the challenges and opportunities in dealing with CML in children, particularly in reference to a center in LMIC.