1
|
Chhabra AM, Snider JW, Kole AJ, Stock M, Holtzman AL, Press R, Wang CJ, Li H, Lin H, Shi C, McDonald M, Soike M, Zhou J, Sabouri P, Mossahebi S, Colaco R, Albertini F, Simone CB. Proton Therapy for Spinal Tumors: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00507-8. [PMID: 39181272 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an important role in the management of primary spine tumors. The purpose of this consensus statement was to summarize safe and optimal delivery of PBT for spinal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee consisting of radiation oncologists and medical physicists with specific expertise in spinal irradiation developed expert recommendations discussing treatment planning considerations and current approaches in the treatment of primary spinal tumors. RESULTS Computed tomography simulation: factors that require significant consideration include (1) patient comfort, (2) setup reproducibility and stability, and (3) accessibility of appropriate beam angles. SPINE STABILIZATION HARDWARE If present, hardware should be placed with cross-links well above/below the level of the primary tumor to reduce the metal burden at the level of the tumor bed. New materials that can reduce uncertainties include polyether-ether-ketone and composite polyether-ether-ketone-carbon fiber implants. FIELD ARRANGEMENT Appropriate beam selection is required to ensure robust target coverage and organ at risk sparing. Commonly, 2 to 4 treatment fields, typically from posterior and/or posterior-oblique directions, are used. TREATMENT PLANNING METHODOLOGY Robust optimization is recommended for all pencil beam scanning plans (the preferred treatment modality) and should consider setup uncertainty (between 3 and 7 mm) and range uncertainty (3%-3.5%). In the presence of metal hardware, use of an increased range uncertainty up to 5% is recommended. CONCLUSIONS The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee has developed recommendations to enable centers to deliver PBT safely and effectively for the management of primary spinal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpit M Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York.
| | - James W Snider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, South Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Delray Beach, Florida
| | - Adam J Kole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Markus Stock
- Department of Medical Physics, EBG MedAustron, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Robert Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - C Jake Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Chengyu Shi
- Department of Medical Physics, City of Hope, Irvine, California
| | - Mark McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael Soike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Pouya Sabouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Department of Medical Physics, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rovel Colaco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Francesca Albertini
- Department of Medical Physics, Paul Scherrer Institut, Würenlingen, Switzerland
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen D, Motlagh SAO, Stappen FV, Labarbe R, Bell B, Kim M, Teo BKK, Dong L, Zou W, Diffenderfer ES. Secondary neutron dosimetry for conformal FLASH proton therapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:5081-5093. [PMID: 38597815 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cyclotron-based proton therapy systems utilize the highest proton energies to achieve an ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) for FLASH radiotherapy. The deep-penetrating range associated with this high energy can be modulated by inserting a uniform plate of proton-stopping material, known as a range shifter, in the beam path at the nozzle to bring the Bragg peak within the target while ensuring high proton transport efficiency for UHDR. Aluminum has been recently proposed as a range shifter material mainly due to its high compactness and its mechanical properties. A possible drawback lies in the fact that aluminum has a larger cross-section of producing secondary neutrons compared to conventional plastic range shifters. Accordingly, an increase in secondary neutron contamination was expected during the delivery of range-modulated FLASH proton therapy, potentially heightening neutron-induced carcinogenic risks to the patient. PURPOSE We conducted neutron dosimetry using simulations and measurements to evaluate excess dose due to neutron exposure during UHDR proton irradiation with aluminum range shifters compared to plastic range shifters. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations in TOPAS were performed to investigate the secondary neutron production characteristics with aluminum range shifter during 225 MeV single-spot proton irradiation. The computational results were validated against measurements with a pair of ionization chambers in an out-of-field region ( ≤ $\le$ 30 cm) and with a Proton Recoil Scintillator-Los Alamos rem meter in a far-out-of-field region (0.5-2.5 m). The assessments were repeated with solid water slabs as a surrogate for the conventional range shifter material to evaluate the impact of aluminum on neutron yield. The results were compared with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards to evaluate the clinical acceptance of the secondary neutron yield. RESULTS For a range modulation up to 26 cm in water, the maximum simulated and measured values of out-of-field secondary neutron dose equivalent per therapeutic dose with aluminum range shifter were found to be( 0.57 ± 0.02 ) mSv/Gy $(0.57\pm 0.02)\ \text{mSv/Gy}$ and( 0.46 ± 0.04 ) mSv/Gy $(0.46\pm 0.04)\ \text{mSv/Gy}$ , respectively, overall higher than the solid water cases (simulation:( 0.332 ± 0.003 ) mSv/Gy $(0.332\pm 0.003)\ \text{mSv/Gy}$ ; measurement:( 0.33 ± 0.03 ) mSv/Gy $(0.33\pm 0.03)\ \text{mSv/Gy}$ ). The maximum far out-of-field secondary neutron dose equivalent was found to be (8.8 ± 0.5 $8.8 \pm 0.5$ ) μ Sv / Gy $\umu {\rm Sv/Gy}$ and (1.62 ± 0.02 $1.62 \pm 0.02$ ) μ Sv / Gy $\umu {\rm Sv/Gy}$ for the simulations and rem meter measurements, respectively, also higher than the solid water counterparts (simulation: (3.3 ± 0.3 $3.3 \pm 0.3$ ) μ Sv / Gy $\umu {\rm Sv/Gy}$ ; measurement: (0.63 ± 0.03 $0.63 \pm 0.03$ ) μ Sv / Gy $\umu {\rm Sv/Gy}$ ). CONCLUSIONS We conducted simulations and measurements of secondary neutron production under proton irradiation at FLASH energy with range shifters. We found that the secondary neutron yield increased when using aluminum range shifters compared to conventional materials while remaining well below the non-primary radiation limit constrained by the IEC regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dixin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Rudi Labarbe
- Ion Beam Applications S.A. (IBA), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Beryl Bell
- Ion Beam Applications S.A. (IBA), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Michele Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stokkevåg CH, Journy N, Vogelius IR, Howell RM, Hodgson D, Bentzen SM. Radiation Therapy Technology Advances and Mitigation of Subsequent Neoplasms in Childhood Cancer Survivors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:681-696. [PMID: 38430101 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) vision paper, challenges and opportunities in the assessment of subsequent neoplasms (SNs) from radiation therapy (RT) are presented and discussed in the context of technology advancement. METHODS AND MATERIALS The paper discusses the current knowledge of SN risks associated with historic, contemporary, and future RT technologies. Opportunities for research and SN mitigation strategies in pediatric patients with cancer are reviewed. RESULTS Present experience with radiation carcinogenesis is from populations exposed during widely different scenarios. Knowledge gaps exist within clinical cohorts and follow-up; dose-response and volume effects; dose-rate and fractionation effects; radiation quality and proton/particle therapy; age considerations; susceptibility of specific tissues; and risks related to genetic predisposition. The biological mechanisms associated with local and patient-level risks are largely unknown. CONCLUSIONS Future cancer care is expected to involve several available RT technologies, necessitating evidence and strategies to assess the performance of competing treatments. It is essential to maximize the utilization of existing follow-up while planning for prospective data collection, including standardized registration of individual treatment information with linkage across patient databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla H Stokkevåg
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Neige Journy
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ivan R Vogelius
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Holtzman AL, Mohammadi H, Furutani KM, Koffler DM, McGee LA, Lester SC, Gamez ME, Routman DM, Beltran CJ, Liang X. Impact of Relative Biologic Effectiveness for Proton Therapy for Head and Neck and Skull-Base Tumors: A Technical and Clinical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1947. [PMID: 38893068 PMCID: PMC11171304 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has emerged as a crucial tool in the treatment of head and neck and skull-base cancers, offering advantages over photon therapy in terms of decreasing integral dose and reducing acute and late toxicities, such as dysgeusia, feeding tube dependence, xerostomia, secondary malignancies, and neurocognitive dysfunction. Despite its benefits in dose distribution and biological effectiveness, the application of proton therapy is challenged by uncertainties in its relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Overcoming the challenges related to RBE is key to fully realizing proton therapy's potential, which extends beyond its physical dosimetric properties when compared with photon-based therapies. In this paper, we discuss the clinical significance of RBE within treatment volumes and adjacent serial organs at risk in the management of head and neck and skull-base tumors. We review proton RBE uncertainties and its modeling and explore clinical outcomes. Additionally, we highlight technological advancements and innovations in plan optimization and treatment delivery, including linear energy transfer/RBE optimizations and the development of spot-scanning proton arc therapy. These advancements show promise in harnessing the full capabilities of proton therapy from an academic standpoint, further technological innovations and clinical outcome studies, however, are needed for their integration into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L. Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Homan Mohammadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Keith M. Furutani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Daniel M. Koffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Lisa A. McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Scott C. Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Mauricio E. Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - David M. Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Chris J. Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bejarano-Quisoboni D, Panjo H, Fresneau B, El-Fayech C, Doz F, Surun A, de Vathaire F, Pelletier-Fleury N. Excess healthcare expenditure in adults treated for solid cancer in childhood: a cohort study in France. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:513-523. [PMID: 37344685 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01606-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to late effects, childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are more likely to have multiple chronic conditions than the general population. However, little is known about the economic burden of care of CCS in the long term. OBJECTIVES To estimate excess healthcare expenditure for long-term CCS in France compared to the general population and to investigate the associated factors. METHODS We included 5353 5-year solid CCS diagnosed before the age of 21 years before 2000 from the French CCS cohort and obtained a random reference sample from the general population for each CCS, matched on age, gender and region of residence. We used the French national health data system to estimate annual healthcare expenditure between 2011 and 2018 for CCS and the reference sample, and computed the excess as the net difference between CCS expenditure and the median expenditure of the reference sample. We used repeated-measures linear models to estimate associations between excess healthcare expenditure and CCS characteristics. RESULTS Annual mean (95% CI) excess healthcare expenditure was €3920 (3539; 4301), mainly for hospitalization (39.6%) and pharmacy expenses (17%). Higher excess was significantly associated with having been treated before the 1990s and having survived a central nervous system tumor, whereas lower excess was associated with CCS who had not received treatment with radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Of the variables that influence excess healthcare expenditure, a lever for action is the type of treatment administered. Future research should focus on addressing the long-term cost-effectiveness of new approaches, especially those related to radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Bejarano-Quisoboni
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm, U1018, Villejuif, France.
- Primary Care and Prevention Team, CESP, Inserm, U1018, Villejuif, France.
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France.
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Henri Panjo
- Primary Care and Prevention Team, CESP, Inserm, U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France
| | - Brice Fresneau
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm, U1018, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Department of Children and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Chiraz El-Fayech
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Department of Children and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - François Doz
- SIREDO Center (Care, Research, Innovation in Pediatric, Adolescents and Young Adults Oncology), Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Aurore Surun
- SIREDO Center (Care, Research, Innovation in Pediatric, Adolescents and Young Adults Oncology), Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm, U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury
- Primary Care and Prevention Team, CESP, Inserm, U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yamamori A, Murayama S, Takahashi I, Akaihata M, Kakuda Y, Sugino T, Aramaki T, Onoe T, Takahashi Y, Ishida Y. Young Adult Secondary Cancer After Proton Beam Therapy: A Case Study. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101307. [PMID: 38260212 PMCID: PMC10801643 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ayako Yamamori
- Division of Pediatrics (and the AYA Generation), Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
- Department of Pediatrics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Ikuko Takahashi
- Division of Pediatrics (and the AYA Generation), Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Mitsuko Akaihata
- Division of Pediatrics (and the AYA Generation), Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | | | - Takeshi Aramaki
- Interventional Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | - Yoshiyuki Takahashi
- Department of Pediatrics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Division of Pediatrics (and the AYA Generation), Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berrington de González A, Gibson TM, Lee C, Albert PS, Griffin KT, Kitahara CM, Liu D, Mille MM, Shin J, Bajaj BV, Flood TE, Gallotto SL, Paganetti H, Ahmed SK, Eaton BR, Indelicato DJ, Milgrom SA, Palmer JD, Baliga S, Poppe MM, Tsang DS, Wong K, Yock TI. The Pediatric Proton and Photon Therapy Comparison Cohort: Study Design for a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort to Investigate Subsequent Cancers After Pediatric Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101273. [PMID: 38047226 PMCID: PMC10692298 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The physical properties of protons lower doses to surrounding normal tissues compared with photons, potentially reducing acute and long-term adverse effects, including subsequent cancers. The magnitude of benefit is uncertain, however, and currently based largely on modeling studies. Despite the paucity of directly comparative data, the number of proton centers and patients are expanding exponentially. Direct studies of the potential risks and benefits are needed in children, who have the highest risk of radiation-related subsequent cancers. The Pediatric Proton and Photon Therapy Comparison Cohort aims to meet this need. Methods and Materials We are developing a record-linkage cohort of 10,000 proton and 10,000 photon therapy patients treated from 2007 to 2022 in the United States and Canada for pediatric central nervous system tumors, sarcomas, Hodgkin lymphoma, or neuroblastoma, the pediatric tumors most frequently treated with protons. Exposure assessment will be based on state-of-the-art dosimetry facilitated by collection of electronic radiation records for all eligible patients. Subsequent cancers and mortality will be ascertained by linkage to state and provincial cancer registries in the United States and Canada, respectively. The primary analysis will examine subsequent cancer risk after proton therapy compared with photon therapy, adjusting for potential confounders and accounting for competing risks. Results For the primary aim comparing overall subsequent cancer rates between proton and photon therapy, we estimated that with 10,000 patients in each treatment group there would be 80% power to detect a relative risk of 0.8 assuming a cumulative incidence of subsequent cancers of 2.5% by 15 years after diagnosis. To date, 9 institutions have joined the cohort and initiated data collection; additional centers will be added in the coming year(s). Conclusions Our findings will affect clinical practice for pediatric patients with cancer by providing the first large-scale systematic comparison of the risk of subsequent cancers from proton compared with photon therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd M. Gibson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paul S. Albert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T. Griffin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Cari Meinhold Kitahara
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Danping Liu
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthew M. Mille
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jungwook Shin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Benjamin V.M. Bajaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tristin E. Flood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara L. Gallotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bree R. Eaton
- Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Daniel J. Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Sarah A. Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Matthew M. Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah–Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Derek S. Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Torunn I. Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Perkins SM, Prime S, Watts M, Huang J, Zhao T. Pediatric Experience and Outcomes from the First Single-Vault Compact Proton Therapy Center. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4072. [PMID: 37627100 PMCID: PMC10452472 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The first single-vault compact proton therapy center opened in 2013, utilizing a gantry-mounted synchrocylotron. The center was placed within a large academic radiation oncology department with a high priority for pediatric cancer care. Here we performed a retrospective study of pediatric (≤21 years) patients treated with proton therapy at our institution between 2013-2022. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were obtained including race, socioeconomic status, insurance type, distance travelled, need for anesthesia, and outside referrals for proton therapy. In total, 250 pediatric patients were treated with proton therapy comprising 18% of our proton patient volume. Median follow-up was 3.1 years, 38.4% were female and 83% were white. The majority of cases were CNS (69.6%) and a large number of patients (80/250, 32%) required craniospinal irradiation. Anesthesia was required for 39.6% of patients. Average distance travelled for treatment was 111 miles and 23% of patients were referred from outside institutions for proton therapy. Insurance type was private/commercial for 61.2% followed by Medicaid for 32%. We found that 23% of patients lived in census tracts with >25% of people living below the national poverty line. Overall survival at 3 years was excellent at 83.7% with better outcomes for CNS patients compared to non-CNS patients. There were no cases of secondary malignancy at this early time point. As the world's first compact proton therapy center, we found that proton therapy increased our pediatric volume and provided proton therapy to a diverse group of children in our region. These data highlight some of the expected patient and tumor characteristics and necessary resources for providing pediatric proton beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M. Perkins
- S. Lee Kling Proton Therapy Center, Washington University School of Medicine/Siteman Cancer Center, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stiller CA, Bunch KJ, Bayne AM, Stevens MCG, Murphy MFG. Subsequent cancers within 5 years from initial diagnosis of childhood cancer. Patterns and risks in the population of Great Britain. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30258. [PMID: 36815611 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patterns and risks of subsequent primary tumours (SPTs) among long-term survivors of childhood cancer have been extensively described, but much less is known about early SPTs (ESPTs) occurring within 5 years after initial diagnosis. PROCEDURE We carried out a population-based study of ESPTs following childhood cancer throughout Britain, using the National Registry of Childhood Tumours. The full study series comprised all ESPTs occurring among 56,620 children whose initial cancer diagnosis was in the period 1971-2010. Frequencies of ESPT were calculated for the entire cohort. For analyses of risk, follow-up began 92 days after initial diagnosis. RESULTS ESPT developed in 0.4% of children overall, 0.52% of those initially diagnosed at age less than 1 year and 0.38% of those diagnosed at age 1-14 years. Standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was 7.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7-8.9), overall 9.5 (95% CI: 7.1-12.5) for children initially diagnosed in 1981-1990 and 6.5-7.5 for those from earlier and later decades. SIR by type of first cancer ranged from 4.4 (95% CI: 1.8-9.1) for Wilms tumour to 13.1 (95% CI: 7.7-21.0) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. SIR by type of ESPT ranged from 2.0 (95% CI: 1.0-3.4) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia to 66.6 (95% CI: 52.3-83.6) for acute myeloid leukaemia. Predisposition syndromes were known to be implicated in 21% of children with ESPT and suspected in another 5%. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an overview of the patterns and risks of ESPTs in a large population where many children received therapy that is still in widespread use. Further research will be needed to monitor and understand changes in risk as childhood cancer treatment continues to evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn J Bunch
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anita M Bayne
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, Didcot, UK
| | - Michael C G Stevens
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael F G Murphy
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sait SF, Giantini-Larsen AM, Tringale KR, Souweidane MM, Karajannis MA. Treatment of Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2023; 23:185-199. [PMID: 36881254 PMCID: PMC10121885 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-023-01257-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pediatric low-grade gliomas and glioneuronal tumors (pLGG) account for approximately 30% of pediatric CNS neoplasms, encompassing a heterogeneous group of tumors of primarily glial or mixed neuronal-glial histology. This article reviews the treatment of pLGG with emphasis on an individualized approach incorporating multidisciplinary input from surgery, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, neuropathology, and pediatric oncology to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of specific interventions against tumor-related morbidity. Complete surgical resection can be curative for cerebellar and hemispheric lesions, while use of radiotherapy is restricted to older patients or those refractory to medical therapy. Chemotherapy remains the preferred first-line therapy for adjuvant treatment of the majority of recurrent or progressive pLGG. RECENT FINDINGS Technologic advances offer the potential to limit volume of normal brain exposed to low doses of radiation when treating pLGG with either conformal photon or proton RT. Recent neurosurgical techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy offer a "dual" diagnostic and therapeutic treatment modality for pLGG in specific surgically inaccessible anatomical locations. The emergence of novel molecular diagnostic tools has enabled scientific discoveries elucidating driver alterations in mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway components and enhanced our understanding of the natural history (oncogenic senescence). Molecular characterization strongly supplements the clinical risk stratification (age, extent of resection, histological grade) to improve diagnostic precision and accuracy, prognostication, and can lead to the identification of patients who stand to benefit from precision medicine treatment approaches. The success of molecular targeted therapy (BRAF inhibitors and/or MEK inhibitors) in the recurrent setting has led to a gradual and yet significant paradigm shift in the treatment of pLGG. Ongoing randomized trials comparing targeted therapy to standard of care chemotherapy are anticipated to further inform the approach to upfront management of pLGG patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Farouk Sait
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Alexandra M Giantini-Larsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn R Tringale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Mark M Souweidane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthias A Karajannis
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gaze MN, Smeulders N, Ackwerh R, Allen C, Bal N, Boutros M, Cho A, Eminowicz G, Gill E, Fittall MW, Humphries PD, Lim P, Mushtaq I, Nguyen T, Peet C, Pendse D, Polhill S, Rees H, Sands G, Shankar A, Slater O, Sullivan T, Hoskin PJ. A National Referral Service for Paediatric Brachytherapy: An Evolving Practice and Outcomes Over 13 Years. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:237-244. [PMID: 36588012 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Most children requiring radiotherapy receive external beam treatment and few have tumours suitable for brachytherapy. No paediatric radiotherapy centre will treat enough patients from its own normal catchment population for expertise in brachytherapy to be developed and sustained. Following discussion and agreement in the national paediatric radiotherapy group, a service for paediatric brachytherapy in the UK has been developed. We report the process that has evolved over more than 10 years, with survival and functional outcome results. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since 2009, potential patients have been referred to the central paediatric oncology multidisciplinary team meeting, where imaging, pathology and treatment options are discussed. Since 2013, the National Soft Tissue Sarcoma Advisory Panel has also reviewed most patients, with the principal aim of advising on the most suitable primary tumour management for complex patients. Clinical assessment and examination under anaesthetic with biopsies may be undertaken to confirm the appropriateness of brachytherapy, either alone or following conservative surgery. Fractionated high dose rate brachytherapy was delivered to a computed tomography planned volume after implantation of catheters under ultrasound imaging guidance. Since 2019, follow-up has been in a dedicated multidisciplinary clinic. RESULTS From 2009 to 2021 inclusive, 35 patients (16 female, 19 male, aged 8 months to 17 years 6 months) have been treated. Histology was soft-tissue sarcoma in 33 patients and carcinoma in two. The treated site was pelvic in 31 patients and head and neck in four. With a median follow-up of 5 years, the local control and overall survival rates are 100%. Complications have been few, and functional outcome is good. CONCLUSION Brachytherapy is effective for selected paediatric patients, resulting in excellent tumour control and good functional results. It is feasible to deliver paediatric brachytherapy at a single centre within a national referral service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M N Gaze
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - N Smeulders
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Ackwerh
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Allen
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Bal
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Boutros
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Cho
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Eminowicz
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E Gill
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M W Fittall
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P D Humphries
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Lim
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Mushtaq
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Nguyen
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Peet
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Pendse
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Polhill
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H Rees
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - G Sands
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Shankar
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - O Slater
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Sullivan
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P J Hoskin
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Holtzman AL, Dagan R, Mendenhall WM. Proton Radiotherapy for Skull-Base Malignancies. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2023:S1042-3699(23)00005-5. [PMID: 37005171 DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
Proton therapy (PT) is a form of highly conformal external-beam radiotherapy used to mitigate acute and late effects following radiotherapy. Indications for treatment include both benign and malignant skull-base and central nervous system pathologies. Studies have demonstrated that PT shows promising results in minimizing neurocognitive decline and reducing second malignancies with low rates of central nervous system necrosis. Future directions and advances in biologic optimization may provide additional benefits beyond the physical properties of particle dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA.
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Upadhyay R, Yadav D, Venkatesulu BP, Singh R, Baliga S, Raval RR, Lazow MA, Salloum R, Fouladi M, Mardis ER, Zaorsky NG, Trifiletti DM, Paulino AC, Palmer JD. Risk of secondary malignant neoplasms in children following proton therapy vs. photon therapy for primary CNS tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:893855. [PMID: 36033525 PMCID: PMC9413159 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.893855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Central nervous system tumors are now the most common primary neoplasms seen in children, and radiation therapy is a key component in management. Secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) are rare, but dreaded complications. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially minimize the risk of SMNs compared to conventional photon radiation therapy (RT), and multiple recent studies with mature data have reported the risk of SMNs after PBT. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize and compare the incidence of SMNs after proton and photon-based radiation for pediatric CNS tumors. Methods A systematic search of literature on electronic (PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase) databases was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. We included studies reporting the incidence and nature of SMNs in pediatric patients with primary CNS tumors. The crude incidence of SMNs and all secondary neoplasms were separately extracted, and the random-effects model was used for pooled analysis and subgroup comparison was performed between studies using photons vs. protons. Results Twenty-four studies were included for analysis. A total of 418 SMNs were seen in 38,163 patients. The most common SMN were gliomas (40.6%) followed by meningiomas (38.7%), sarcomas (4.8%), and thyroid cancers (4.2%). The median follow-up was 8.8 years [3.3–23.2].The median latency to SMN for photons and protons were 11.9 years [5-23] and 5.9 years [5-6.7], respectively. The pooled incidence of SMNs was 1.8% (95% CI: 1.1%–2.6%, I2 = 94%) with photons and 1.5% (95% CI: 0%–4.5%, I2 = 81%) with protons. The pooled incidence of all SNs was not different [photons: 3.6% (95% CI: 2.5%–4.8%, I2 = 96%) vs. protons: 1.5% (95% CI: 0–4.5%, I2 = 80%); p = 0.21]. Conclusion We observed similar rates of SMN with PBT at 1.5% compared to 1.8% with photon-based RT for pediatric CNS tumors. We observed a shorter latency to SMN with PBT compared to RT. With increasing use of pencil beam scanning PBT and VMAT, further studies are warranted to evaluate the risk of secondary cancers in patients treated with these newer modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Divya Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Raju R. Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Margot A. Lazow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Ralph Salloum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Maryam Fouladi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Elaine R. Mardis
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Nicholas G. Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | | | - Arnold C. Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- *Correspondence: Joshua D. Palmer,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bejarano-Quisoboni D, Pelletier-Fleury N, Allodji RS, Lacour B, GrosClaude P, Pacquement H, Doz F, Berchery D, Pluchart C, Bondiau PY, Nys J, Jackson A, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Dumas A, Thomas-Teinturier C, Vu-Bezin G, Valteau-Couanet D, Haddy N, Fresneau B, de Vathaire F. Health care expenditures among long-term survivors of pediatric solid tumors: Results from the French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (FCCSS) and the French network of cancer registries (FRANCIM). PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267317. [PMID: 35617253 PMCID: PMC9135272 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) may require lifelong medical care due to late effects of cancer treatments. Little is known about of their healthcare utilization and expenditures at long-term especially in publicly funded health care system. We aim to estimate and describe the health care expenditures among long-term CCS in France. Methods A total of 5319 five-year solid CCS diagnosed before the age of 21 between 1945 and 2000 in France were identified in the French Childhood Cancer Survivors Study cohort (FCCSS) and the French cancer registry. Information about health care expenditure was taken from the French national health data system between 2011 and 2016, and was described according to survivors’ characteristics. Generalized linear models were used to determine associations between health care expenditures and survivors’ characteristics. Results Mean annual amount of healthcare expenditures was € 4,255. Expenditures on hospitalizations and pharmacy represents 60% of total expenditures. Mean annual of healthcare expenditures were higher at increasing age, among women survivors (€ 4,795 vs € 3,814 in men) and in central nervous system (CNS) tumor survivors (€ 7,116 vs € 3,366 in lymphoma and € 3,363 in other solid tumor survivors). Conclusions Childhood cancer survivorship is associated with a substantial economic burden in France. We found that female gender and CNS primary cancer were associated with increased healthcare expenditures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Bejarano-Quisoboni
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Primary care and Prevention Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury
- Primary care and Prevention Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - Rodrigue S. Allodji
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Brigitte Lacour
- EPICEA, CRESS, INSERM UMR 1153, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Registre National des Tumeurs Solides de l’Enfant, CHRU Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Hélène Pacquement
- SIREDO Center (Care, Research, Innovation in Pediatric, Adolescents and Young Adults Oncology), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - François Doz
- SIREDO Center (Care, Research, Innovation in Pediatric, Adolescents and Young Adults Oncology), Institut Curie, Paris, France
- University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Julie Nys
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Angela Jackson
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Agnès Dumas
- Université de Paris, ECEVE, UMR1123, Inserm, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Thomas-Teinturier
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Service d’Endocrinologie et Diabétologie Pédiatrique AP-HP, Université Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Giao Vu-Bezin
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Nadia Haddy
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Brice Fresneau
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
- Department of Children and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Paris, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Romero-Expósito M, Toma-Dasu I, Dasu A. Determining Out-of-Field Doses and Second Cancer Risk From Proton Therapy in Young Patients—An Overview. Front Oncol 2022; 12:892078. [PMID: 35712488 PMCID: PMC9197425 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.892078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has the potential to provide survival and tumor control outcomes comparable and frequently superior to photon therapy. This has led to a significant concern in the medical physics community on the risk for the induction of second cancers in all patients and especially in younger patients, as they are considered more radiosensitive than adults and have an even longer expected lifetime after treatment. Thus, our purpose is to present an overview of the research carried out on the evaluation of out-of-field doses linked to second cancer induction and the prediction of this risk. Most investigations consisted of Monte Carlo simulations in passive beam facilities for clinical scenarios. These works established that equivalent doses in organs could be up to 200 mSv or 900 mSv for a brain or a craniospinal treatment, respectively. The major contribution to this dose comes from the secondary neutrons produced in the beam line elements. Few works focused on scanned-beam facilities, but available data show that, for these facilities, equivalent doses could be between 2 and 50 times lower. Patient age is a relevant factor in the dose level, especially for younger patients (by means of the size of the body) and, in addition, in the predicted risk by models (due to the age dependence of the radiosensitivity). For risks, the sex of the patient also plays an important role, as female patients show higher sensitivity to radiation. Thus, predicted risks of craniospinal irradiation can range from 8% for a 15-year-old male patient to 58% for a 2-year-old female patient, using a risk model from a radiological protection field. These values must be taken with caution due to uncertainties in risk models, and then dosimetric evaluation of stray radiation becomes mandatory in order to complement epidemiological studies and be able to model appropriate dose–response functions for this dose range. In this sense, analytical models represent a useful tool and some models have been implemented to be used for young patients. Research carried out so far confirmed that proton beam therapy reduces the out-of-field doses and second cancer risk. However, further investigations may be required in scanned-beam delivery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maite Romero-Expósito
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Oncology Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Maite Romero-Expósito,
| | - Iuliana Toma-Dasu
- Oncology Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim N, Lim DH. Recent Updates on Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Optic Pathway Glioma. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2022; 10:94-100. [PMID: 35545828 PMCID: PMC9098980 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2022.0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Optic pathway glioma (OPG) is a rare tumor located in optic nerve, optic tract, or optic chiasm. Treatment options for OPG include surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and chemotherapy. Although RT may provide favorable long-term outcomes in manner of either adjuvant or salvage aim, chemotherapy-first approach is increasingly performed due to possible late effects of RT. Proton beam RT may allow normal tissue sparing of radiation exposure compared to conventional X-ray treatment. Therefore, proton beam RT is expected to reduce complications from RT. This review discusses the recent updates on oncologic outcomes of OPG, late toxicities following RT, and compares the outcomes between X-ray treatment and proton beam RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Do Hoon Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tringale KR, Casey DL, Niyazov G, Lavery JA, Moskowitz C, Friedman DN, Wolden SL. Second cancer risk in childhood cancer survivors treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: An updated analysis of more than 10 years of follow-up. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29600. [PMID: 35234340 PMCID: PMC9476885 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear how intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) impacts long-term risk of second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in childhood cancer patients. PROCEDURE Patients aged ≤21 years treated with IMRT between 1998 and 2009 and who survived ≥5 years after IMRT were included. SMN site in relation to isodose level (IDL) of IMRT was evaluated. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and excess absolute risks (EAR) were calculated. Cumulative incidences were estimated with death as a competing risk. RESULTS Three-hundred twenty-five patients were included with median follow-up of 11.2 years from IMRT (interquartile range: 9.4-14.0) among patients alive at the end of follow-up. Two hundred (62%) patients had ≥10 years of follow-up and 284 (87%) patients were alive at the time of analysis. Fifteen patients developed SMNs (11 solid, four hematologic). Median time from IMRT to solid SMN was 11.0 years (range: 6.8-19.2) with 10- and 15-year cumulative incidences 1.8% (95% CI: 0.7-3.9) and 3.5% (95% CI: 1.4-7.5), respectively; SIR was 13.7 (95% CI: 6.9-24.6) and EAR was 2.8 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 1.0-4.6). Eight solid SMNs developed within the IMRT field (100% IDL [n = 5], 80% IDL [n = 1], 50% IDL [n = 1], 40% IDL [n = 1]), one within the 70%-80% IDL of a conventional field, one was out-of-field, and one could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS With median follow-up of >10 years, many solid SMNs after IMRT in childhood cancer survivors develop in the high-dose region. These data serve as a foundation for comparison with other modalities of radiation treatment (e.g., proton therapy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dana L. Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina
| | - Gregory Niyazov
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Chaya Moskowitz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - Suzanne L. Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Majer M, Ambrožová I, Davídková M, De Saint-Hubert M, Kasabašić M, Knežević Ž, Kopeć R, Krzempek D, Krzempek K, Miljanić S, Mojżeszek N, Veršić I, Stolarczyk L, Harrison RM, Olko P. Out-of-field doses in pediatric craniospinal irradiations with 3D-CRT, VMAT and scanning proton radiotherapy - a phantom study. Med Phys 2022; 49:2672-2683. [PMID: 35090187 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) has greatly increased survival rates for patients with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and other primitive neuroectodermal tumors. However, as it includes exposure of a large volume of healthy tissue to unwanted doses, there is a strong concern about the complications of the treatment, especially for the children. To estimate the risk of second cancers and other unwanted effects, out-of-field dose assessment is necessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare out-of-field doses in pediatric CSI treatment using conventional and advanced photon radiotherapy (RT) and advanced proton therapy. To our knowledge, it is the first such comparison based on in-phantom measurements. Additionally, for out-of-field doses during photon RT in this and other studies, comparisons were made using analytical modeling. METHODS In order to describe the out-of-field doses absorbed in a pediatric patient during actual clinical treatment, an anthropomorphic phantom which mimics the 10-year-old child was used. Photon 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and two advanced, highly conformal techniques: photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and active pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiotherapy were used for CSI treatment. Radiophotoluminescent (RPL) and poly-allyl-diglycol-carbonate (PADC) nuclear track detectors were used for photon and neutron dosimetry in the phantom, respectively. Out-of-field doses from neutrons were expressed in terms of dose equivalent. A two-Gaussian model was implemented for out-of-field doses during photon RT. RESULTS The mean VMAT photon doses per target dose to all organs in this study were under 50% of the target dose (i.e., <500 mGy/Gy), while the mean 3D-CRT photon dose to oesophagus, gall bladder and thyroid, exceeded that value. However, for 3D-CRT, better sparing was achieved for eyes and lungs. The mean PBS photon doses for all organs were up to 3 orders of magnitude lower compared to VMAT and 3D-CRT and exceeded 10 mGy/Gy only for the oesophagus, intestine and lungs. The mean neutron dose equivalent during PBS for 8 organs of interest (thyroid, breasts, lungs, liver, stomach, gall bladder, bladder, prostate) ranged from 1.2 mSv/Gy for bladder to 23.1 mSv/Gy for breasts. Comparison of out-of-field doses in this and other phantom studies found in the literature showed that a simple and fast two-Gaussian model for out-of-field doses as a function of distance from the field edge can be applied in a CSI using photon RT techniques. CONCLUSIONS PBS is the most promising technique for out-of-field dose reduction in comparison to photon techniques. Among photon techniques, VMAT is a preferred choice for most of out-of-field organs and especially for the thyroid, while doses for eyes, breasts and lungs, are lower for 3D-CRT. For organs outside the field edge, a simple analytical model can be helpful for clinicians involved in treatment planning using photon RT but also for retrospective data analysis for cancer risk estimates and epidemiology in general. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Majer
- Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
| | - Iva Ambrožová
- Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, CZ-250 68, Czech Republic
| | - Marie Davídková
- Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, CZ-250 68, Czech Republic
| | | | - Mladen Kasabašić
- Osijek University Hospital, Osijek, 31000, Croatia.,Faculty of Medicine Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, 31000, Croatia
| | | | - Renata Kopeć
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | - Dawid Krzempek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Krzempek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | | | - Natalia Mojżeszek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | - Ivan Veršić
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
| | - Liliana Stolarczyk
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland.,Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Roger M Harrison
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
| | - Paweł Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Normal Tissue Complication Probability Modelling for Toxicity Prediction and Patient Selection in Proton Beam Therapy to the Central Nervous System: A Literature Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:e225-e237. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
20
|
Indelicato DJ, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Grippin AJ, Bradley JA, Mailhot Vega RB, Viviers E, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI, MacDonald SM. Bicentric Treatment Outcomes After Proton Therapy for Nonmyxopapillary High-Grade Spinal Cord Ependymoma in Children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:335-341. [PMID: 34597719 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Few studies report outcomes in children treated with radiation for nonmyxopapillary ependymoma of the spinal cord, and little evidence exists to inform decisions regarding target volume and prescription dose. Moreover, virtually no mature outcome data exist on proton therapy for this tumor. We describe our combined institutional experience treating pediatric classical/anaplastic ependymoma of the spinal cord with proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2008 and 2019, 14 pediatric patients with nonmetastatic nonmyxopapillary grade II (n = 6) and grade III (n = 8) spinal ependymoma received proton therapy. The median age at radiation was 14 years (range, 1.5-18 years). Five tumors arose within the cervical cord, 3 within the thoracic cord, and 6 within the lumbosacral cord. Before radiation therapy, 3 patients underwent subtotal resection, and 11 underwent gross-total or near total resection. Two patients received chemotherapy. For radiation, the clinical target volume received 50.4 Gy (n = 8), 52.2 (n = 1), or 54 Gy (n = 5), with the latter receiving a boost to the gross tumor volume after the initial 50.4 Gy, modified to respect spinal cord tolerance. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 6.3 years (range, 1.5-14.8 years), no tumors progressed. Although most patients experienced neurologic sequela after surgery, only 1 developed additional neurologic deficits after radiation: An 18-year-old male who received 54 Gy after gross total resection of a lumbosacral tumor developed grade 2 erectile dysfunction. There were 2 cases of musculoskeletal toxicity attributable to surgery and radiation. At analysis, no patient had developed cardiac, pulmonary, or other visceral organ complications or a second malignancy. CONCLUSION Radiation to a total dose of 50 to 54 Gy can be safely delivered and plays a beneficial role in the multidisciplinary management of children with nonmyxopapillary spinal cord ependymoma. Proton therapy may reduce late radiation effects and is not associated with unexpected spinal cord toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Myrsini Ioakeim-Ioannidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam J Grippin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Emma Viviers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Paulino AC, Ludmir EB, Grosshans DR, Su JM, McGovern SL, Okcu MF, McAleer MF, Baxter PA, Mahajan A, Chintagumpala MM. Overall survival and secondary malignant neoplasms in children receiving passively scattered proton or photon craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma. Cancer 2021; 127:3865-3871. [PMID: 34254296 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT) and passively scattered proton therapy have a risk of secondary malignant neoplasm (SMN) in children. To determine the influence of RT modality on the incidence of SMN after craniospinal irradiation (CSI), the authors compared the incidence of SMN in children who had medulloblastoma treated with either photon CSI plus an intensity-modulated RT boost (group I) or passively scattered proton CSI plus a boost (group II). METHODS From 1996 to 2014, 115 children with medulloblastoma (group I, n = 63; group II, n = 52) received CSI followed by a boost to the tumor bed. Most patients had standard-risk disease (63.5%). The median follow-up was 12.8 years for group I and 8.7 years for group II. RESULTS The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 88.8% and 85.1%, respectively, for standard-risk patients and 63.1% and 57.3%, respectively, for high-risk patients, with no OS difference by RT modality (P = .81). Six SMNs were identified (4 in group I, 2 in group II). The 5-year and 10-year SMN incidence rates were 1.0% and 6.9%, respectively (0.0% and 8.0%, respectively, in group I; 2.2% and 4.9%, respectively, in group II; P = .74). Two SMNs occurred in the clinical target volume in the brain, 2 occurred in the exit dose region from the photon spinal field, 1 occurred in the entrance path of a proton beam, and 1 occurred outside the radiation field. There were no reported cases of secondary leukemia. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrates no difference in OS or SMN incidence between patients in groups I and II 10 years after RT. LAY SUMMARY One hundred fifteen children with medulloblastoma received radiotherapy (RT) with either photon craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and an intensity-modulated RT boost (group I; n = 63) or passively scattered proton CSI and a boost (group II;, n = 52). The majority of children had standard-risk disease (63.5%). The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 88.8% and 85.1% for standard-risk patients, respectively, and 63.1% and 57.3% for high-risk patients, respectively, with no difference in overall survival by RT group (P = .81). The 5-year and 10-year second malignant neoplasm incidence rates were 1.0% and 6.9%, respectively, with no difference in second malignant neoplasm incidence according to RT group (P = .74).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jack M Su
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - M Fatih Okcu
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patricia A Baxter
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Murali M Chintagumpala
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|