Late isolated central nervous system relapse in childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with intensified systemic therapy and delayed reduced dose cranial radiation: A report from the Children's Oncology Group study AALL02P2

Low-risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and young adults: what have we learnt and what's next?

While outcomes for newly diagnosed children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved over the last few decades, 10-15% will relapse. Outcomes for those children with relapse remains a challenge, with 5-year overall survival of approximately 35-60%. Large cooperative group trials have identified factors associated with favorable (low risk, LR) outcome at relapse, including later relapse, B-cell phenotype, isolated extramedullary relapse and a good response to initial re-induction therapy. Contemporary therapeutic regimens are aimed at improving outcomes, while decreasing toxicity. A main focus of current research involves how immunotherapy can be best incorporated with cytotoxic chemotherapy to improve survival in relapsed ALL. Here we review therapeutic strategies for LR relapse, including review of recently completed and ongoing trials.

Nuanced Management of a Skull Base Tumor in the Setting of Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Introduction  Relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) involving the central nervous system (CNS) is a significant issue that contributes to both morbidity and mortality. Given the poor outcomes in patients with CNS relapse, understanding how ALL involving intracranial relapse presents and is treated is critical. Here, we present a complex case of relapsed recurrent ALL in a pediatric patient. Case Report  An 11-year-old patient presented with double relapse of ALL in the form of an extensive skull base lesion and again with leptomeningeal disease. For the skull base lesion, she was treated nonsurgically with chemotherapy and radiation, which led to a remarkable reduction in the size of the lesion. However, she was found to have early recurrence with leptomeningeal enhancement resulting in hydrocephalus 5 months after completing therapy. A shunt was placed successfully. Currently, she is being managed with monthly intrathecal chemotherapy with cerebrospinal fluid sampling and bone marrow biopsies every 2 months. Discussion  We report the significant effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in reducing the size of the extensive skull base lesion, saving the patient from the risks associated with surgery. This patient's initial relapse, with a large skull base lesion that had intracranial involvement, is an unusual presentation of relapsed ALL. The additional early recurrence of leptomeningeal disease further makes this case unique and the management even more nuanced. Here, we demonstrate a multidisciplinary approach for the successful treatment of our patient, which can help guide the management of similar patients in the future.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 4A: Access to CAR T Cell Therapy in Unique Populations with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The approval of tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) for use in children with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) was based on the phase 2 ELIANA trial, a global registration study. However, the ELIANA trial excluded specific subsets of patients facing unique challenges and did not include a sufficient number of patients to adequately evaluate outcomes in rare subpopulations. Since the commercialization of tisa-cel, data have become available that support therapeutic indications beyond the specific cohorts previously eligible for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeted to CD19 (CD19 CAR-T) therapy on the registration clinical trial. Substantial real-world data and aggregate clinical trial data have addressed gaps in our understanding of response rates, longer-term efficacy, and toxicities associated with CD19 CAR-T in special populations and rare clinical scenarios. These include patients with central nervous system relapsed disease, who were excluded from ELIANA and other early CAR-T trials owing to concerns about risk of neurotoxicity that have not been born out. There is also interest in the use of CD19 CAR-T for very-high-risk patients earlier in the course of therapy, such as patients with persistent minimal residual disease after 2 cycles of upfront chemotherapy and patients with first relapse of B-ALL. However, these indications are not specified on the label for tisa-cel and historically were not included in eligibility criteria for most clinical trials; data addressing these populations are needed. Populations at high risk of relapse, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic lesions, infants with B-ALL, patients with trisomy 21, and young adults with B-ALL, also may benefit from earlier treatment with CD19 CAR-T. It is important to prospectively study patient-reported outcomes given the differential toxicity expected between CD19 CAR-T and the historic standard of care, hematopoietic cell transplantation. Now that CD19 CAR-T therapy is commercially available, studies evaluating potential access disparities created by this very expensive novel therapy are increasingly pressing.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Central Nervous System Involvement-Challenges in Management

The survival of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has dramatically improved during the last six decades. This improvement is secondary to improved diagnostics, risk stratification of treatment by biological features and response to treatment, improved supportive care, and the introduction of new treatment modalities such as immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy. However, many questions remain concerning the involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) in leukemia, including ones pertaining to the risk factors for CNS involvement and relapse, the optimal treatment strategy to prevent relapse, and the role of newer therapies. This review discusses these questions by addressing the diagnosis of CNS leukemia, the current clinical trial data for treatment regimens with CNS activity, and issues specific to treatment in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Blinatumomab Conundrum in Low-Risk Relapsed B-Cell ALL

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

The Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL1331 trial demonstrated improved survival and less toxicity in children with high-/intermediate-risk relapsed ALL receiving blinatumomab compared with intensive chemotherapy before hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT). The low-risk arm of AALL1331 compared addition of three cycles of blinatumomab to chemotherapy alone, but a survival improvement was not noted. Secondary analyses showed improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of low-risk patients with bone marrow disease ± extramedullary (EM) involvement (4-year DFS 72.7% ± 5.8% v 53.7% ± 6.7%; 4-year OS 97.1% ± 2.1% v 84.8% ± 4.8%), but failed to show an advantage with blinatumomab for patients with isolated EM relapse. Of note, DFS of isolated CNS (iCNS) relapse was worse than previous studies at 24% on both arms, likely because of decreases in CNS-intensive therapy compared with previous approaches and inadequacy of blinatumomab for controlling CNS disease.

CASE

Our case of late isolated CNS B-cell ALL relapse outlines challenges for clinicians attempting to decrease toxicity and avoid HSCT: (1) defining of low risk appropriately, (2) attempting to reduce the treatment burden of past protocols, and (3) understanding approach and timing of cranial irradiation.

APPROACH

Although AALL1331 therapy without blinatumomab leads to excellent survival in patients with isolated testicular relapse, we recommend a modified AALL02P2 backbone of chemotherapy with 1,800 cGy cranial radiotherapy for patients with late iCNS relapse. Future studies integrating chimeric antigen receptor T cells, which have better CNS penetration, may help decrease the intensive treatment burden for patients with late iCNS recurrence.

Children's Oncology Group AALL1331: Phase III Trial of Blinatumomab in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Low-Risk B-Cell ALL in First Relapse

PURPOSE

Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy, is efficacious in relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL (B-ALL) and has a favorable toxicity profile. One aim of the Children's Oncology Group AALL1331 study was to compare survival of patients with low-risk (LR) first relapse of B-ALL treated with chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus blinatumomab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After block 1 reinduction, patients age 1-30 years with LR first relapse of B-ALL were randomly assigned to block 2/block 3/two continuation chemotherapy cycles/maintenance (arm C) or block 2/two cycles of continuation chemotherapy intercalated with three blinatumomab blocks/maintenance (arm D). Patients with CNS leukemia received 18 Gy cranial radiation during maintenance and intensified intrathecal chemotherapy. The primary and secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The 4-year DFS/OS for the 255 LR patients accrued between December 2014 and September 2019 were 61.2% ± 5.0%/90.4% ± 3.0% for blinatumomab versus 49.5% ± 5.2%/79.6% ± 4.3% for chemotherapy (P = .089/P = .11). For bone marrow (BM) ± extramedullary (EM) (BM ± EM; n = 174) relapses, 4-year DFS/OS were 72.7% ± 5.8%/97.1% ± 2.1% for blinatumomab versus 53.7% ± 6.7%/84.8% ± 4.8% for chemotherapy (P = .015/P = .020). For isolated EM (IEM; n = 81) relapses, 4-year DFS/OS were 36.6% ± 8.2%/76.5% ± 7.5% for blinatumomab versus 38.8% ± 8.0%/68.8% ± 8.6% for chemotherapy (P = .62/P = .53). Blinatumomab was well tolerated and patients had low adverse event rates.

CONCLUSION

For children, adolescents, and young adults with B-ALL in LR first relapse, there was no statistically significant difference in DFS or OS between the blinatumomab and standard chemotherapy arms overall. However, blinatumomab significantly improved DFS and OS for the two thirds of patients with BM ± EM relapse, establishing a new standard of care for this population. By contrast, similar outcomes and poor DFS for both arms were observed in the one third of patients with IEM; new treatment approaches are needed for these patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02101853).

Ethnic-specific predictors of neurotoxicity among patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia after high-dose methotrexate

BACKGROUND

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX; 5000 mg/m2 ) is an important component of curative therapy in many treatment regimens for high-risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, methotrexate therapy can result in dose-limiting neurotoxicity, which may disproportionately affect Latino children. This study evaluated risk factors for neurotoxicity after HD-MTX in an ethnically diverse population of patients with ALL.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with ALL and treated with HD-MTX at Texas Children's Cancer Center (2010-2017). Methotrexate neurotoxicity was defined as a neurologic episode (e.g., seizures or stroke-like symptoms) occurring within 21 days of HD-MTX that resulted in methotrexate treatment modifications. Mixed effects multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between clinical factors and neurotoxicity.

RESULTS

Overall, 351 patients (58.1% Latino) who received 1183 HD-MTX infusions were evaluated. Thirty-five patients (10%) experienced neurotoxicity, 71% of whom were Latino. After adjusting for clinical risk factors, the authors observed that serum creatinine elevations ≥50% of baseline were associated with a three-fold increased odds (OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 0.98-11.21; p = .05) for neurotoxicity compared with creatinine elevation <25%. Notably, predictors of neurotoxicity differed by ethnicity. Specifically, Latino children experienced a nearly six-fold increase in neurotoxicity odds (OR, 5.80; 95% CI, 1.39-24.17; p = .02) with serum creatinine elevation ≥50% compared with creatinine elevation <25%.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings indicate that serum creatinine elevations ≥50% may be associated with an increased risk for neurotoxicity among Latino children with ALL and may identify potential candidates for therapeutic or supportive care interventions.

Recent Advances in Treatment Options for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Simple Summary

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common blood cancer in pediatric patients. Despite the enormous progress in ALL treatment, which is reflected by a high 5-year overall survival rate that reaches up to 96% in the most recent studies, there are still patients that cannot be saved. Treatment of ALL is based on conventional methods, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. These methods carry with them the risk of very high toxicities. Severe complications related to conventional therapies decrease their effectiveness and can sometimes lead to death. Therefore, currently, numerous studies are being carried out on novel forms of treatment. In this work, classical methods of treatment have been summarized. Furthermore, novel treatment methods and the possibility of combining them with chemotherapy have been incorporated into the present work. Targeted treatment, CAR-T-cell therapy, and immunotherapy for ALL have been described. Treatment options for the relapse/chemoresistance ALL have been presented.

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common blood cancer in pediatric patients. There has been enormous progress in ALL treatment in recent years, which is reflected by the increase in the 5-year OS from 57% in the 1970s to up to 96% in the most recent studies. ALL treatment is based primarily on conventional methods, which include chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Their main weakness is severe toxicity, which prompts dose reduction, decreases the effectiveness of the treatment, and, in some cases, can lead to death. Currently, numerous modifications in treatment regimens are applied in order to limit toxicities emerging from conventional approaches and improve outcomes. Hematological treatment of pediatric patients is reaching for more novel treatment options, such as targeted treatment, CAR-T-cells therapy, and immunotherapy. These methods are currently used in conjunction with chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the swift progress in their development and increasing efficacity can lead to applying those novel therapies as standalone therapeutic options for pediatric ALL.