Factors contributing to delayed childhood cancer care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review protocol

Prognostic impact of pre-referral tumor resection in unilateral Wilms tumor: A single-institute experience from a lower middle-income country

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prognostic impact of pre-referral surgical resection of Wilms tumor (WT) performed at non-oncology centers, and to strategize an improved care plan for this very curable pediatric tumor.

METHODS

In this study conducted in a large pediatric cancer center in Pakistan, we retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) of 149 patients with unilateral WT from September 2008 to August 2017. Based on treatment approach, patients were categorized into two groups: (i) pre-referral tumor resection (PTR: n = 75), and (ii) post-neoadjuvant chemo nephrectomy (PCN: n = 74).

RESULTS

The proportion of metastatic disease in PTR and PCN groups was 33.3% and 35.1%, respectively. In the PTR subset, median time to admission after PTR was 5 weeks (mean 11, SEM 2.8, range: 2-202) weeks, with 53.3% (n = 40) presenting more than 4 weeks after PTR. Twenty patients had no cross-sectional imaging prior to PTR and underwent surgery after abdominal ultrasound only. On baseline imaging at our center, 58.7% (n = 44) of the PTR group had radiologically evaluable disease (four metastases only, 19 local residual tumor only, 21 both localized tumor and visible metastases). Disease staging was uncertain in 23 patients because of no or inadequate histology specimens and/or lymph node sampling in patients with no evaluable disease. Statistically significant differences were recorded for the two subsets regarding tumor volume, extent and nodularity, renal vein and renal sinus involvement, lymph node status, tumor rupture and histopathologic features, and tumor stage, with a 10-year event-free survival (EFS) for PCN and PTR of 74.3% and 50.7%, respectively (p < .001). In the PTR group, EFS for those presenting within 4 weeks and later was 91.4% versus 15.0%, respectively (p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Suboptimal pre-referral surgical intervention results in poor survival outcomes in unilateral WT. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive action plan for educating healthcare professionals engaged in WT diagnosis and referral process. PCN in a multidisciplinary team approach can reduce surgical morbidity and seems to be a better strategy to improve the survival rates in low-resource settings.

Modeling the global impact of reducing out-of-pocket costs for children's surgical care

Over 1.7 billion children lack access to surgical care, mostly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with substantial risks of catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) and impoverishment. Increasing interest in reducing out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures as a tool to reduce the rate of poverty is growing. However, the impact of reducing OOP expenditures on CHE remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to estimate the global impact of reducing OOP expenditures for pediatric surgical care on the risk of CHE within and between countries. Our goal was to estimate the impact of reducing OOP expenditures for surgical care in children for 149 countries by modeling the risk of CHE under various scale-up scenarios using publicly available World Bank data. Scenarios included reducing OOP expenditures from baseline levels to paying 70%, 50%, 30%, and 10% of OOP expenditures. We also compared the impact of these reductions across income quintiles (poorest, poor, middle, rich, richest) and differences by country income level (low-income, lower-middle-income, upper-middle-income, and high-income countries).Reducing OOP expenditures benefited people from all countries and income quintiles, although the benefits were not equal. The risk of CHE due to a surgical procedure for children was highest in low-income countries. An unexpected observation was that upper-middle income countries were at higher risk for CHE than LMICs. The most vulnerable regions were Africa and Latin America. Across all countries, the poorest quintile had the greatest risk for CHE. Increasing interest in financial protection programs to reduce OOP expenditures is growing in many areas of global health. Reducing OOP expenditures benefited people from all countries and income quintiles, although the benefits were not equal across countries, wealth groups, or even by wealth groups within countries. Understanding these complexities is critical to develop appropriate policies to minimize the risks of poverty.

Delay in diagnosis and associated factors among children with cancer admitted at pediatric oncology ward, University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, Ethiopia: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Delay in the diagnosis of childhood cancer is one of the major health problem that contribute to decreased survival rates of children particularly in developing nations. Despite advances in the field of pediatric oncology, cancer remains a leading cause of death in children. Diagnosis of childhood cancer as early as possible is crucial to reduce mortality. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess delay in diagnosis and associated factors among children with cancer admitted to pediatric oncology ward, University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, Ethiopia 2022.

METHOD

Institutional-based retrospective cross-sectional study design was conducted from January1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital. All 200 children were included in the study and Data were extracted through structured check-list. The data were entered using EPI DATA version 4.6 and exported to STATA version 14.0 for data analysis.

RESULTS

From the total of two hundred pediatric patients 44% had delayed diagnosis and the median delay diagnosis was 68 days. Rural residence (AOR = 1.96; 95%CI = 1.08-3.58), absence of health insurance (AOR = 2.21; 95%CI = 1.21-4.04), Hodgkin lymphoma (AOR = 9.36; 95%CI = 2.1-41.72), Retinoblastoma (AOR = 4.09; 95%CI = 1.29-13.02), no referral (AOR = 6.3; 95%CI = 2.15-18.55) and absence of comorbid disease (AOR = 2.14; 95%CI = 1.17-3.94) were significant factors associated with delay in diagnosis.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Delayed in diagnosis of childhood cancer was relatively lower than previous studies and most influenced by the child's residency, health insurance, type of cancer and comorbid disease. Thus; every effort should be made to promote public and parental understanding of childhood cancer, promote health insurance and referral.

Determinants of delayed childhood cancer care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Early access to care is essential to improve survival rates for childhood cancer. This study evaluates the determinants of delays in childhood cancer care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) through a systematic review of the literature. We proposed a novel Three-Delay framework specific to childhood cancer in LMICs by summarizing 43 determinants and 24 risk factors of delayed cancer care from 95 studies. Traditional medicine, household income, lack of transportation, rural population, parental education, and travel distance influenced most domains of our framework. Our novel framework can be used as a policy tool toward improving cancer care and outcomes for children in LMICs.

Factors contributing to delayed childhood cancer care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Significant disparities exist for timely access to cancer care for children, with the highest disparities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to conduct a systematic review that identifies the factors contributing to delayed care of childhood cancers in LMICs.

METHODS

We will conduct a systematic review with search strings compliant with the PICO framework: (1) the Population-children (aged 0-18 years) from LMICs; (2) the Exposure-factors contributing to timely childhood cancer care; (3) the Outcome-delays in childhood cancer care.

DISCUSSION

Our study is an essential step to guide strategic interventions to assess the myriad of factors that prevent children from accessing timely cancer care in LMICs. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and shared with institutions related to the field.