1
|
Braunack-Mayer A, Fabrianesi B, Street J, O'Shaughnessy P, Carter SM, Engelen L, Carolan L, Bosward R, Roder D, Sproston K. Sharing Government Health Data With the Private Sector: Community Attitudes Survey. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e24200. [PMID: 34596573 PMCID: PMC8520136 DOI: 10.2196/24200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The use of government health data for secondary purposes, such as monitoring the quality of hospital services, researching the health needs of populations, and testing how well new treatments work, is increasing. This increase in the secondary uses of health data has led to increased interest in what the public thinks about data sharing, in particular, the possibilities of sharing with the private sector for research and development. Although international evidence demonstrates broad public support for the secondary use of health data, this support does not extend to sharing health data with the private sector. If governments intend to share health data with the private sector, knowing what the public thinks will be important. This paper reports a national survey to explore public attitudes in Australia toward sharing health data with private companies for research on and development of therapeutic drugs and medical devices. Objective This study aims to explore public attitudes in Australia toward sharing government health data with the private sector. Methods A web-based survey tool was developed to assess attitudes about sharing government health data with the private sector. A market research company was employed to administer the web-based survey in June 2019. Results The survey was completed by 2537 individuals residing in Australia. Between 51.8% and 57.98% of all participants were willing to share their data, with slightly fewer in favor of sharing to improve health services (51.99%) and a slightly higher proportion in favor of sharing for research and development (57.98%). There was a preference for opt-in consent (53.44%) and broad support for placing conditions on sharing health information with private companies (62% to 91.99%). Wide variability was also observed in participants’ views about the extent to which the private sector could be trusted and how well they would behave if entrusted with people’s health information. In their qualitative responses, the participants noted concerns about private sector corporate interests, corruption, and profit making and expressed doubt about the Australian government’s capacity to manage data sharing safely. The percentages presented are adjusted against the Australian population. Conclusions This nationally representative survey provides preliminary evidence that Australians are uncertain about sharing their health data with the private sector. Although just over half of all the respondents supported sharing health data with the private sector, there was also strong support for strict conditions on sharing data and for opt-in consent and significant concerns about how well the private sector would manage government health data. Addressing public concern about sharing government health data with the private sector will require more and better engagement to build community understanding about how agencies can collect, share, protect, and use their personal data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Braunack-Mayer
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Belinda Fabrianesi
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Jackie Street
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Pauline O'Shaughnessy
- School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Stacy M Carter
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Lina Engelen
- School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Lucy Carolan
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Rebecca Bosward
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - David Roder
- University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
McCormick N, Hamilton CB, Koehn CL, English K, Stordy A, Li LC. Canadians' views on the use of routinely collected data in health research: a patient-oriented cross-sectional survey. CMAJ Open 2019; 7:E203-E209. [PMID: 30948649 PMCID: PMC6450795 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about Canadians' knowledge of and level of support for using administrative and other large, routinely collected data for health research, despite the benefits of this type of research to patients, health care systems and society. We sought to benchmark the views of Canadian adults on this topic. METHODS Researchers and patient leaders of 3 joint and skin disease organizations codeveloped a cross-sectional online survey that was conducted between January and August 2017. The patient partners were engaged as full partners. Recruitment was mainly through the organizations' websites, email and social media. The survey captured respondents' initial perceptions, then (after background information on the topic was provided) elicited their views on the benefits of health research using routinely collected data, data access/privacy concerns, ongoing perceptions and educational needs. RESULTS Of the 230 people who consented, 183 (79.6%) started the survey, and 151 (65.6%) completed the survey. Of the 151, 117 (77.5%) were women, 84 (55.6%) were British Columbians, 87 (57.6%) were university graduates, and 101 (66.9%) had a chronic disease. At the beginning of the survey, 119 respondents (78.8%) felt positively about the use of routinely collected data for health research. Respondents identified the ability to study long-term treatment effects and rare events (114 [75.5%]) and large numbers of people (110 [72.8%]) as key benefits. Deidentification of personal information was the top privacy measure (135 [89.4%]), and 101 respondents (66.9%) wanted to learn more about data stewards' granting access to data. On survey completion, more respondents (141 [93.4%]) felt positively about the use of routinely collected data, but only 87 (57.6%) were confident about data security and privacy. INTERPRETATION Respondents generally supported the use of deidentified routinely collected data for health research. Although further investigation is needed with more representative samples, our findings suggest that additional education, especially about access and privacy controls, may enhance public support for research endeavours using these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie McCormick
- Arthritis Research Canada (McCormick, Hamilton, Li), Richmond, BC; Department of Physical Therapy (Hamilton, Li), University of British Columbia; Arthritis Consumer Experts (Koehn), Vancouver, BC; Arthritis Patients Advisory Board (English), Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC; Canadian Skin Patient Alliance (Stordy), Calgary, Alta
| | - Clayon B Hamilton
- Arthritis Research Canada (McCormick, Hamilton, Li), Richmond, BC; Department of Physical Therapy (Hamilton, Li), University of British Columbia; Arthritis Consumer Experts (Koehn), Vancouver, BC; Arthritis Patients Advisory Board (English), Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC; Canadian Skin Patient Alliance (Stordy), Calgary, Alta
| | - Cheryl L Koehn
- Arthritis Research Canada (McCormick, Hamilton, Li), Richmond, BC; Department of Physical Therapy (Hamilton, Li), University of British Columbia; Arthritis Consumer Experts (Koehn), Vancouver, BC; Arthritis Patients Advisory Board (English), Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC; Canadian Skin Patient Alliance (Stordy), Calgary, Alta
| | - Kelly English
- Arthritis Research Canada (McCormick, Hamilton, Li), Richmond, BC; Department of Physical Therapy (Hamilton, Li), University of British Columbia; Arthritis Consumer Experts (Koehn), Vancouver, BC; Arthritis Patients Advisory Board (English), Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC; Canadian Skin Patient Alliance (Stordy), Calgary, Alta
| | - Allan Stordy
- Arthritis Research Canada (McCormick, Hamilton, Li), Richmond, BC; Department of Physical Therapy (Hamilton, Li), University of British Columbia; Arthritis Consumer Experts (Koehn), Vancouver, BC; Arthritis Patients Advisory Board (English), Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC; Canadian Skin Patient Alliance (Stordy), Calgary, Alta
| | - Linda C Li
- Arthritis Research Canada (McCormick, Hamilton, Li), Richmond, BC; Department of Physical Therapy (Hamilton, Li), University of British Columbia; Arthritis Consumer Experts (Koehn), Vancouver, BC; Arthritis Patients Advisory Board (English), Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC; Canadian Skin Patient Alliance (Stordy), Calgary, Alta.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Skovgaard LL, Wadmann S, Hoeyer K. A review of attitudes towards the reuse of health data among people in the European Union: The primacy of purpose and the common good. Health Policy 2019; 123:564-571. [PMID: 30961905 PMCID: PMC6558994 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Studies of attitudes towards reuse of health data mainly from the UK. Studies show lack of awareness of current usages of health data among people living in the EU. Studies report positive attitudes towards the sharing of health data. Concerns about commercial use of health data is expressed in the studies. Attitudes towards informed consent are inconsistent.
Health data are used for still more purposes, and policies are enacted to facilitate data reuse within the European Union. This literature synthesis explores attitudes among people living in the European Union towards the use of health data for purposes other than treatment. Our findings indicate that while a majority hold positive attitudes towards the use of health data for multiple purposes, the positive attitudes are typically conditional on the expectation that data will be used to further the common good. Concerns evolve around the commercialisation of data, data security and the use of data against the interests of the people providing the data. Studies of these issues are limited geographically as well as in scope. We therefore identify a need for cross-national exploration of attitudes among people living in the European Union to inform future policies in health data governance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea L Skovgaard
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farigmagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
| | - Sarah Wadmann
- The Danish Center for Social Science Research, VIVE, Herluf Trolles Gade 11. 1052, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Klaus Hoeyer
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farigmagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|