Use of QT-prolonging medications in US emergency departments, 1995-2009

QT prolongation, torsades des pointes, and cardiac arrest after 4 mg of IV ondansetron

Ondansetron is a commonly used antiemetic in the emergency department despite a 2011 FDA warning regarding dose-related QTc prolongation and torsades des pointes (TdP). Cases of TdP from small ondansetron doses administered in the emergency department are lacking. A 41-year-old-woman with alcohol use disorder on no medications or supplements presented to an emergency department with one day of nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain. Examination revealed a pulse of 77 beats/min and epigastric tenderness. The patient received 4 mg IV ondansetron, 30 mg IV ketorolac, and was placed on cardiac monitoring. ECG obtained one minute after ondansetron demonstrated premature ventricular contractions with QTc = 653 ms. Thirteen minutes after receiving ondansetron she suffered TdP and cardiac arrest. She received immediate CPR and IV epinephrine with successful defibrillation at one minute. She then received IV magnesium. Post-arrest ECGs demonstrated persistent QTc prolongation immediately and at three hours post-arrest. Laboratory studies, drawn prior to arrest, demonstrated hypokalemia (3.2 mEq/L), hypomagnesemia (1.3 mg/dL), and elevated lipase (4918 IU/L). She received no additional QT-prolonging agents. Transthoracic echocardiogram and troponins were normal; ECG intervals completely normalized within 12 h and she was discharged neurologically intact. The patient returned 18 months later with recurrent pancreatitis and similar electrolyte abnormalities; QT-prolonging drugs were avoided at that time and her course was uncomplicated. QT prolongation with subsequent torsades des pointes and cardiac arrest may occur in high-risk patients receiving small doses of ondansetron. Further studies are warranted to determine the safest antiemetic for use in the emergency department.

Development in Prescriptions of Contraindicated and Potentially Harmful QT Interval-Prolonging Drugs in a Large Geriatric Inpatient Cohort From 2011 to 2021

Regulatory authorities put major emphasis on QT (interval)-prolonging properties of new molecular entities. Product information/Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) of multiple drugs contain warnings or contraindications regarding QT prolongation, e.g., on coadministration of QT-prolonging drugs (QT drugs). To characterize the development of the QT drug burden, we performed a trend analysis of prescriptions and co-prescriptions of QT drugs in a large geriatric inpatient cohort. The German SmPCs (status of 2014 and of 2021) and the year-wise listings in the CredibleMeds^® database from 2011 to 2021 were used as sources. There were 402,631 geriatric cases included. The group of QT drugs according to SmPCs in 2014, which must not be combined with other QT drugs, was less frequently involved in contraindicated co-prescriptions in 2021 compared with 2015 (3.0% (2.5-3.7%) of cases with at least one of those drugs in 2021 vs. 4.0% (3.5-4.5%) in 2015), with citalopram, escitalopram, and amiodarone involved in nearly 90% of the co-prescriptions. The number of CredibleMeds-QT-drugs per patient increased from 0.4 (SD=1.1) in 2011 to 1.8 (SD=3.9) in 2021. The percentage of contraindicated co-prescriptions of drugs with known risk for torsade de pointes according to CredibleMeds^® listings at the beginning of the respective years increased from 1.7% in 2011 to 6.1% in 2021. Considering the regularly updated CredibleMeds^® QT drugs list, the contraindicated co-prescriptions of QT drugs markedly increased in the last decade. If prescribers considered only the few most frequently (co-) prescribed QT drugs, then most of the medication errors regarding QT drugs could be prevented.

Risk assessment tools for QT prolonging pharmacotherapy in older adults: a systematic review

Purpose

Many drugs are associated with the risk of QT prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP), and different risk assessment tools (RATs) are developed to help clinicians to manage related risk. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence of different RATs for QT prolonging pharmacotherapy.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases. Studies concerning risk assessment tools for QT prolonging pharmacotherapy, including older adults, were included. Screening and selection of the studies, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were undertaken.

Results

A total of 21 studies were included, involving different risk assessment tools. Most commonly used tools were risk scores (n = 9), computerized physician order entry systems (n = 3), and clinical decision support systems (n = 6). The tools were developed mainly for physicians and pharmacists. Risk scores included a high number of risk factors, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, for QT prolongation and TdP. The inclusion of patients’ risk factors in computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems varied.

Conclusion

Most of the risk assessment tools for QT prolonging pharmacotherapy give a comprehensive overview of patient-specific risks of QT prolongation and TdP and reduce modifiable risk factors and actual events. The risk assessment tools could be better adapted to different health information systems to help in clinical decision-making. Further studies on clinical validation of risk assessment tools with randomized controlled trials are needed.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-022-03285-3.

Salbutamol-Induced QT Interval Prolongation in a Two-Year-Old Patient

Salbutamol-induced QT interval prolongation is a relatively rare adverse effect of beta2-agonists. We report a case of a two-year-old female patient with no known past medical history, brought by her parents to the ED 30 minutes after ingesting a total dose of 97 mg of salbutamol solution. ECG was done for the patient when she arrived and showed sinus tachycardia with prolonged QTc (509 ms) and normal QRS complex. The patient was admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) with persistent tachycardia and tachypnea in the initial reassessment. ECG was repeated with normal QT interval after IV Mg sulfate. The patient was observed in PICU for 12 hours with serial ECG and venous blood gas (VBG). IV potassium chloride (KCL) infusion started, and serial VBG showed normal potassium and lactate. The patient was doing well in the next six hours, with normal serial ECG, labs, and vital signs.

In conclusion, salbutamol-induced QT prolongation has infrequently been reported in the literature. Although inhaled salbutamol is commonly used in clinical practice, physicians have limited experience with the severe features of its toxicity. Salbutamol is known to cause minimal side effects, which may be under-recognized and progress to serious manifestations such as hypokalemia, QT prolongation, and sudden cardiac death.

Unmasking Long QT Syndrome in the Emergency Department: A Case Report

Introduction

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is an uncommon disorder that can lead to potentially life-threatening dysrhythmias. LQTS can be genetic, acquired, or both.

Case Report

A 44-year-old female with well-controlled hypertension and asthma presented with chest tightness. An initial electrocardiogram yielded a normal corrected QT interval of 423 milliseconds (ms) (normal <480 ms in females). Albuterol was administered and induced agitation, tremulousness, and tachycardia. Follow-up electrocardiograms demonstrated extreme prolongation of the corrected QT interval to 633 ms and morphology change of the T wave. Lab values were later notable for hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia, attributable to a recently started thiazide diuretic. The patient was ultimately diagnosed with congenital LQTS after initial unmasking by albuterol in the emergency department.

Conclusion

LQTS can be unmasked or exacerbated by electrolyte abnormalities and QT prolonging medications.

Prevalence and nature of potential drug-drug interactions among hospitalized HIV patients presenting with suspected meningitis in Uganda

Background

Management of co-infections including cryptococcal meningitis, tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections in persons living with HIV can lead to complex polypharmacotherapy and increased susceptibility to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Here we characterize the frequency and types of potential DDIs (pDDIs) in hospitalized HIV patients presenting with suspected cryptococcal or tuberculous meningitis.

Methods

In a retrospective review of three cryptococcal meningitis trials between 2010 and 2017 in Kampala, Uganda, medications received over hospitalization were documented and pDDI events were assessed. IBM Micromedex DRUGDEX® online drug reference system was used to identify and describe potential interactions as either contraindicated, major, moderate or minor. For antiretroviral DDIs, the Liverpool Drug Interactions Checker from the University of Liverpool was also used to further describe interactions observed.

Results

In 1074 patients with suspected meningitis, pDDIs were present in 959 (overall prevalence = 89.3%) during the analyzed 30 day window. In total, 278 unique interacting drug pairs were identified resulting in 4582 pDDI events. Of all patients included in this study there was a mean frequency of 4.27 pDDIs per patient. Of the 4582 pDDI events, 11.3% contraindicated, 66.4% major, 17.4% moderate and 5% minor pDDIs were observed. Among all pDDIs identified, the most prevalent drugs implicated were fluconazole (58.4%), co-trimoxazole (25.7%), efavirenz (15.6%) and rifampin (10.2%). Twenty-one percent of the contraindicated pDDIs and 27% of the major ones involved an antiretroviral drug. Increased likelihood of QT interval prolongation was the most frequent potential clinical outcome. Dissonance in drug interaction checkers was noted requiring clinicians to consult more than one database in making clinical decisions about drug combinations.

Conclusions

The overall prevalence of pDDIs in this population is high. An understanding of drug combinations likely to result in undesired clinical outcomes, such as QT interval prolongation, is paramount. This is especially important in resource limited settings where availability of therapeutic drug monitoring and laboratory follow-up are inconsistent. Adequate quantification of the increased likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes from multiple drug-drug interactions of the same kind in a single patient is needed to aid clinical decisions in this setting.

Sex differences in the pharmacology of itch therapies-a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Chronic itch is the most common skin-related condition, associated with a high psychosocial and economic burden. In recent years, increasing evidence of sex differences in the perception, clinical presentation and treatment requirements of itch points towards potential benefits when using sex-adapted therapies. It is well-known that body composition, absorption, metabolism, elimination and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) differ between sexes, but only little is known about the impact of sex in the pharmacology of itch treatments, which could help to rationalise sex-adapted treatment strategies.

AIM

To evaluate and review sex effects in the pharmacokinetics and /-dynamics of drugs used to treat itch.

METHODS

In this narrative review we performed a PubMed and MEDLINE (Ovid) search using the terms (itch OR pruritus) AND (gender OR sex) AND (drug OR medication OR pharmacokinetics OR pharmacodynamics). Additional searches were performed for the topical and systemic drugs recommended by the European Guideline on Chronic Pruritus.

RESULTS

We found numerous reports with variable levels of evidence of sex effects with respect to the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of 14 drug classes used for the treatment of itch, including a total of 19 systemic and 3 topical drugs. Women seem to present higher plasma levels of several drugs used in itch treatment, including tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants (e.g. doxepin, amitriptyline, mirtazapine), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g. paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine), immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil), serotonin receptor antagonists (e.g. ondansetron) and betablockers (e.g. propranolol). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were generally more common in women. Being female was reported to be an independent risk factor for QTc-prolongation associated with antihistamines and tetracyclic antidepressants. Additionally, women seem to be more prone to sedative effects of antihistamines, and to suffer from a higher frequency as well as severity of side effects with systemic calcineurin inhibitors, opioid agonists, and opioid antagonists. Women were also sensitised more often to topically applied drugs. Of note, apart from only one experimental study with capsaicin, none of these reports were designed specifically to assess the effect of sex (and gender) in the treatment of itch.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Our review supports previous reports that sex is of importance in the pharmacokinetics and /-dynamics of several drugs used to treat itch although those drugs were mostly evaluated for non-itch indications. However, the results are limited by methodological limitations evident in most studies such as underrepresentation of women in clinical trials. This emphasises the need to study the impact of sex (and gender) in future itch trials to yield better outcomes and prevent ADRs in both sexes.

Factors associated with drug interactions in elderly hospitalized in high complexity hospital

This study aims to determine the frequency of potential drug-drug interactions (PDI) in hospitalized elderly and associated factors. This is a cross-sectional study in a teaching hospital. The dependent variable was the occurrence of potential drug interactions identified using DrugReax software. Patients with adverse drug reactions (ADR) related to clinical manifestations of PDIs were also identified. Multivariate logistic regressions was performed to analyze the association between the occurrence of PDIs and independent variables. In total, 237 older adults were included in the study. The prevalence of PDIs and interaction-related ADRs was 87.8% and 6.8%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed a positive association between the detection of PDIs (OR 8.6; 95% CI, 2.5-30.0), and hospitalization due to a diagnosed circulatory system disease and number of medications > 14 (OR 9.8; 95% CI, 2.8-34.3%). The study showed a high prevalence of PDIs in the drug treatment of the elderly, but a lower prevalence of ADRs, as well as a positive association between PDIs and hospitalization due to a diagnosed circulatory system disease and number of medications > 14. The identification of factors associated with PDIs guides prevention measures for people that are more exposed to adverse events.

Effect of a single dose of i.v. ondansetron on QTc interval in emergency department patients

PURPOSE

Results of a study to determine whether i.v. administration of a single dose of 4 mg of ondansetron was associated with QT interval prolongation in emergency department (ED) patients are reported.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study conducted at an urban academic medical center ED, a convenience sample of adult ED patients treated with ondansetron 4 mg i.v. were enrolled. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained immediately before and 5 minutes after ondansetron administration. Measurements of heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc measurements) provided by ECG machines were evaluated. An electrophysiologist analyzed all ECGs for adverse electrical events and verified the accuracy of QTc values. The primary objective was to measure the QTc change from baseline after ondansetron administration. The secondary objective was to describe adverse electrical cardiac events. Interactions between ondansetron and patients' home medications or ED-provided medications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among patients included in the data analysis (n = 20), ondansetron administration was associated with a mean QTc increase of 16.2 msec (95% confidence interval, 4.2-28.2 msec; p = 0.01) and a median increase of 12 msec (interquartile range, 5.5-18.0 msec; p < 0.01). One patient had a significant cardiac event (pulseless electrical activity) that was likely unrelated to ondansetron use. The home medications of 9 patients (42.9%) were deemed to pose a risk of torsades de pointes, and 17 major QT-prolonging drug-drug interactions were identified.

CONCLUSION

Significant QTc prolongation occurred in ED patients receiving a single 4-mg i.v. dose of ondansetron. None of the patients had an ondansetron-related cardiac adverse event.

Torsades de Pointes after Ondansetron Infusion in 2 Patients

Drugs that prolong the electrocardiographic QT interval increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, particularly torsades de pointes. Ondansetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist antiemetic, is one such drug. We present the cases of 2 patients who were given intravenous ondansetron and subsequently developed torsades de pointes. Both had normal QT intervals at baseline but were discovered to have risk factors that predisposed them to drug-induced QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias. We briefly review the mechanisms for torsades de pointes caused by QT-prolonging medications, describe characteristics that increase patients' susceptibility to drug-induced QT prolongation, and call attention to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients who are given ondansetron.

Two Sudden and Unexpected Deaths of Patients with Schizophrenia Associated with Intramuscular Injections of Antipsychotics and Practice Guidelines to Limit the Use of High Doses of Intramuscular Antipsychotics

Intravenous haloperidol has been associated with torsades de pointes (TdP). These two sudden deaths were probable adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following intramuscular (IM) antipsychotics. The autopsies described lack of heart pathology and were highly compatible with the possibility of TdP in the absence of risk factors other than the accumulation of antipsychotics with a high serum peak after the last injection, leading to death within hours. The first case was a 27-year-old African-American male with schizophrenia but no medical issues. His death was probably caused by repeated IM haloperidol injections of 10 mg (totaling 35 mg in 2 days). The second case involves a 42-year-old African-American female with metabolic syndrome. Her probable cause of death was the last ziprasidone IM injection of 20 mg in addition to (1) three extra haloperidol doses (2 hours before the ziprasidone injection, 5 mg oral haloperidol; approximately 21 hours earlier, 5 mg oral haloperidol; and 2 days prior, one 10 mg IM haloperidol injection), (2) 10 mg/day of scheduled oral haloperidol for 6 days before death, and (3) a long-acting paliperidone injection of 156 mg 18 days before death. The study of haloperidol glucuronidation and its impairment in some African-Americans is urgently recommended.

Co-Prescription of QT-Interval Prolonging Drugs: An Analysis in a Large Cohort of Geriatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced QT-interval prolongation is associated with occurrence of potentially fatal Torsades de Pointes arrhythmias (TdP). So far, data regarding the overall burden of QT-interval prolonging drugs (QT-drugs) in geriatric patients are limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to assess the individual burden of QT-interval prolonging drugs (QT-drugs) in geriatric polymedicated patients and to identify the most frequent and risky combinations of QT-drugs.

METHODS

In the discharge medication of geriatric patients between July 2009 and June 2013 from the Geriatrics in Bavaria-Database (GiB-DAT) (co)-prescriptions of QT-drugs were investigated. QT-drugs were classified according to a publicly available reference site (CredibleMeds®) as ALL-QT-drugs (associated with any QT-risk) or High-risk-QT-drugs (corresponding to QT-drugs with known risk of Torsades de Pointes according to CredibleMeds®) and in addition as SmPC-high-risk-QT-drugs (according to the German prescribing information (SmPC) contraindicated co-prescription with other QT-drugs).

RESULTS

Of a cohort of 130,434 geriatric patients (mean age 81 years, 67% women), prescribed a median of 8 drugs, 76,594 patients (58.7%) received at least one ALL-QT-drug. Co-prescriptions of two or more ALL-QT-drugs were observed in 28,768 (22.1%) patients. Particularly risky co-prescriptions of High-risk-QT-drugs or SmPC-high-risk-QT-drugs with at least on further QT-drug occurred in 55.9% (N = 12,633) and 54.2% (N = 12,429) of these patients, respectively. Consideration of SmPCs (SmPC-high-risk-QT-drugs) allowed the identification of an additional 15% (N = 3,999) patients taking a risky combination that was not covered by the commonly used CredibleMeds® classification. Only 20 drug-drug combinations accounted for more than 90% of these potentially most dangerous co-prescriptions.

CONCLUSION

In a geriatric study population co-prescriptions of two and more QT-drugs were common. A considerable proportion of QT-drugs with higher risk only could be detected by using more than one classification-system. Local adaption of international classifications can improve identification of patients at risk.

Epidemiology of Polypharmacy and Potential Drug-Drug Interactions Among Pediatric Patients in ICUs of U.S. Children's Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Polypharmacy is common in hospitalized children in the United States and has been identified as a major risk factor for exposure to potential drug-drug interactions. Little is known about the characteristics and prevalence of exposure of pediatric patients to polypharmacy and potential drug-drug interactions in PICUs.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System database.

SETTING

Forty-two freestanding children's hospitals throughout the United States.

PATIENTS

A total of 54,549 patients less than 18 years old cared for in PICUs in 2011. Patients in neonatal ICUs were not included.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

PICU patients were on average exposed to 10 distinct drugs each hospital day and to 20 drugs cumulatively during their hospitalization. Seventy-five percent of patients were exposed to greater than or equal to one potential drug-drug interaction regardless of severity level, 6% to greater than or equal to one contraindicated potential drug-drug interaction, 69% to greater than or equal to one major potential drug-drug interaction, 57% to greater than or equal to one moderate potential drug-drug interaction, 19% to greater than or equal to one minor potential drug-drug interaction. Potential drug-drug interaction exposures were significantly associated with specific diagnoses (p < 0.001), presence of complex chronic conditions (p < 0.001), increasing number of total distinct drugs used (p < 0.001), increasing length of stay in PICU (p < 0.001), and white race (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Many PICU patients are exposed to substantial polypharmacy and potential drug-drug interactions. Future research should identify the risk of adverse drug events following specific potential drug-drug interaction exposures, especially the risk of adverse drug events due to multiple potential drug-drug interaction exposures, and determine the probability and magnitude of the actual harm (if any) for each specific potential drug-drug interaction, especially for multiple potential drug-drug interaction exposures.

Emergency department ondansetron use in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and vomiting

OBJECTIVE

To assess the hypothesis that ondansetron administration to children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) presenting for emergency department (ED) care with intercurrent illness and vomiting improves clinical outcomes by reducing hospitalization rates (primary), length of ED stay, intravenous fluid (IVF) administration, and revisits (secondary outcomes).

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a single-center, 10-year retrospective cohort study of 345 ED encounters of children aged 6 months-8 years with T1DM and vomiting. We compared outcomes among children receiving and not receiving ondansetron. To avoid selection bias related to ondansetron administration, we also investigated outcomes by conducting comparisons by ondansetron usage periods (ie, low [2002-2004] vs high [2009-2011]).

RESULTS

Ondansetron usage increased from 0% to 67% of ED encounters between 2002 and 2011. Admission rates were similar among those administered [54% (58/107)] and not administered ondansetron [55% (131/238)]. Length of stay was longer in children receiving ondansetron (409 vs 315 minutes; P = .03). IVF administration (77% vs 77%) and revisits (5.6% vs 5.9%) were similar. Ondansetron administration was not associated with reduced admission in logistic regression modeling. Admission rate (62%; 56/91 vs 49%; 57/111) (-13%, 95% CI -23%, 3%), length of stay (395 vs 327 minutes [IQR 164 501]; P < .001), and IVF administration decreased (84% [77/91] to 70% [78/111]; P = .02] when comparing low and high ondansetron usage periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Ondansetron administration was not independently associated with lower admission rates. Over time, along with increasing ondansetron use, there have been reductions in admissions, length of stay, and IVF administration in children with T1DM.