The potential drug-drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and warfarin

Drug-Related Problems and Factors Involved in the Imbalance of Oral Anticoagulants in Lebanese Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

The goal of this study was to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) and the factors involved in the imbalance of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and vitamin K antagonists in a Lebanese adult population with cardiovascular diseases. An imbalance in the hemostatic systems between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors in circulating blood produces either hemorrhagic or thrombotic conditions. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted during 5 months in a teaching hospital. All patients at least 18 years of age taking oral anticoagulants were included in the study. A standardized questionnaire was used, and information was obtained from the patients’ profiles and electronic medical records. DRPs were identified and categorized according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe classification system. A total of 258 patients were included. The overall prevalence of DRPs was 87.2%; the highest prevalence was observed in patients taking acenocoumarol (96.0%), in contrast to 76.7% and 59.0% in patients taking dabigatran and rivaroxaban, respectively. Drug interaction was the most frequent DRP (83.3%), followed by inappropriate monitoring (42.6%) and excessive dose (26.7%). Having renal disease, and taking proton-pump inhibitors or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were among the factors affecting the international normalized ratio (INR) range (adjusted odds ratio [ORa] = 2.513, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.238, 5.101; ORa = 2.487, 95% CI 1.139, 5.430 and ORa = 2.114, 95% CI 1.043, 4.286, respectively), whereas smoking and renal disease significantly affected activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (ORa = 8.325, 95% CI 1.577, 43.965 and ORa = 6.922, 95% CI 1.471, 32.570, respectively). Patients taking NOACs had greater aPTT control and fewer DRPs, with a wide therapeutic index enabling administration of fixed doses.

Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulant and proton pump inhibitor co-therapy

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to reduce the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulants, and patients are increasingly on oral anticoagulants and PPI co-therapy. However, evidence is lacking on the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants when co-administered with PPIs.

Methods

Among patients initiating oral anticoagulants (warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants [NOACs], i.e. rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) during 2013–2017, those concomitantly prescribed PPIs were identified (n = 19,851). The primary endpoint was hospitalization for major upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and secondary endpoints were death and ischemic stroke.

Results

During a mean 1.4 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 512 (2.58%) patients. Overall, NOACs were associated with lower upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk after adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities and concomitant medications (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.65–0.94), compared to warfarin. There was no significant difference in upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk among the individual NOACs. This trend of reduced risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in NOACs compared to warfarin was consistent for both regular and reduced doses, throughout bleeding risk groups, and other subgroup analyses. NOACs were also associated with lower risk of death compared to warfarin. The risk for ischemic stroke was not significantly different among the oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Conclusion

In patients on oral anticoagulant and PPI co-therapy, NOACs were associated with lower risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality compared to warfarin, while there was no difference among the oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. In patients on PPI therapy, NOACs may preferred over warfarin for decreasing risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality.

Proton pump inhibitors and cardiovascular adverse effects: Real or surreal worries?

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely prescribed agents, either for treatment or prophylaxis of gastrointestinal (GI) disease, that are often administered for prolonged or chronic use. Patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease frequently receive PPIs for prophylaxis against GI bleeding due to common use of antithrombotic drugs. Over the last several years there is a growing number of reports associating chronic PPI use with a variety of serious CV and non-CV adverse effects. In this context, PPI use has been independently associated with an increased risk of CV morbidity (myocardial infarction, stroke, other CV events) and mortality. However, the critique remains that these data do not largely derive from randomized controlled trials. On the other hand, in certain conditions, the benefits of PPIs may outweigh the risks of adverse CV effects. As the indications for prolonged, particularly lifelong, prophylactic use of PPIs are not compelling and in the light of evidence of serious CV and other adverse effects, clinicians have to reconsider such long-term use of these drugs. Importantly, histamine 2 blockers have not been found to be associated with increased CV risk and thus may be an alternative therapeutic option in certain patients. These issues are amply discussed together with the potential mechanisms of these pleiotropic and off-target effects of PPIs, which are also depicted in an illustrative schema; data are also presented on differential effects of specific agents involved, alternative modes of therapy available, and relevant current guidelines on this issue.

Proton pump inhibitors co-prescribed with warfarin reduce warfarin control as measured by time in therapeutic range

INTRODUCTION

Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant that requires ongoing monitoring with time in therapeutic range (TTR), a common measure of the quality of warfarin control and likelihood of adverse events including bleeds. Numerous factors can influence these warfarin outcomes including drug interactions. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been reported to interact with warfarin but there remain conflicting reports with regard to the impact on bleeds and limited data on TTR. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of PPIs on warfarin control using TTR and bleeds as endpoints.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected for patients managed by a warfarin management clinic in Queensland. Data collected included current medications, reported bleeds and INR results to calculate TTR. Patients were grouped as taking PPIs or not taking PPIs. Analysis of TTR and bleeds occurred for these groups both before and after exclusions of other medication reported to interact with warfarin.

RESULTS

Of the 4494 included patients, almost half (44.5%) were taking PPIs with esomeprazole most commonly (34.8%) prescribed. Patients taking PPIs had significantly reduced TTR compared with patients not taking PPIs both before (78.5 ± 9.7% vs 81.7 ± 10.2%, P < 0.0001) and after (84.4 ± 5.1% vs 89.4 ± 8.0%, P < 0.0001) excluding all other interacting medications with warfarin. Patients taking PPIs also had significantly higher incidence of minor bleeds compared with patients not taking PPIs (32.4% vs 26.1%, P = 0.0487).

DISCUSSION

Patients taking PPIs with warfarin had significantly lower TTRs and higher incidence of minor bleeds. This combination warrants additional caution and monitoring with warfarin control as measured by TTR potentially affected.

Drug interactions with oral anticoagulants in German nursing home residents: comparison between vitamin K antagonists and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants based on two nested case-control studies

BACKGROUND

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are susceptible to drug-drug interactions. Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have a decreased sensitivity to pharmacokinetic interactions and might be therefore considered superior in patients treated with multiple drugs. The objective of this study was to compare the risk of serious bleeding associated with interacting drugs in German nursing home residents treated with VKA or NOAC.

METHODS

Using claims data of new nursing home residents aged ≥ 65 years (2010-2014) we conducted separate nested case-control analyses within two cohorts of patients treated with VKA or NOAC, respectively. Cases were defined as patients hospitalized for serious bleeding. For each case, up to 20 controls were selected by risk-set sampling. Conditional logistic regression was used to obtain confounder-adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk of bleeding associated with VKA or NOAC use and interacting drugs compared with the use of the respective oral anticoagulant alone.

RESULTS

Among 127,227 new nursing home residents, 16,804 patients received oral anticoagulation. Based on 372 cases and 7281 matched controls, the highest risk of bleeding in VKA users was observed for the concomitant use of antibiotics (aOR 3.00; CI 2.11-4.27) vs. VKA use alone, followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (1.66; 1.13-2.43). Among 243 NOAC cases and 4776 matched controls, elevated risks for bleeding were observed for the use of heparins (2.05; 1.25-3.36) and platelet inhibitors (1.92; 1.36-2.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant medication needs to be prescribed cautiously and monitored closely in nursing home residents treated with oral anticoagulants.

Temporal trends of time in therapeutic range and incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Optimal time in therapeutic range (TTR) of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is crucial for cardiovascular events (CVEs) prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The relationship between temporal changes of TTR and the incidence of CVEs has been poorly investigated. We investigated 1) temporal trends of TTR in a long-term follow-up of NVAF patients; 2) the incidence of CVEs according to changes of TTR.

METHODS

Prospective observational study including 1341 NVAF outpatients (mean age 73.5 years, 42.5% male) starting VKAs. Patients were divided into 4 groups: Group 0: Optimal TTR, consistently ≥70% (n = 241); Group 1: Temporally worsening TTR, from above to below 70% (n = 263); Group 2: Temporally improving TTR, from below to above 70% (n = 270); Group 3: Suboptimal TTR, consistently <70% (n = 567).

RESULTS

In a mean follow-up of 37.7 months (4214.2 patient-years), 108 CVEs occurred (2.6%/year). Survival analysis showed a graded increased risk of CVEs in relation to temporal changes in TTR, with the worst outcomes in Groups 1 and 3 (log-rank test p = 0.013). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that Group 1 vs. 0 (HR: 2.096; 95%CI 1.061-4.139, p = 0.033), Group 3 vs. 0 (HR: 2.292; 95%CI 1.205-4.361, p = 0.011), CHA₂DS₂VASc score (HR:1.316; 95%CI 1.153-1.501, p < 0.001) and PPIs (HR:0.453; 95%CI 0.285-0.721, p = 0.001) were independently associated with CVEs.

CONCLUSION

A decrease of TTR <70% over time is observed in almost 20% of NVAF patients. Patients with worsening TTR temporally (ie. from initially above 70% to below 70%) have similar risk of CVEs of patients with consistently suboptimal anticoagulation.

Time to therapeutic range (TtTR), anticoagulation control, and cardiovascular events in vitamin K antagonists-naive patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) reduce cardiovascular events (CVEs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) when a time in therapeutic range (TiTR) >70% is achieved. Factors affecting the time to achieve the TR (TtTR) are unknown.

METHODS

Prospective observational study including 1,406 nonvalvular AF patients starting VKAs followed for a mean of 31.3months (3,690 patient/year); TiTR, TtTR, and SAMe-TT₂R₂ score were calculated, and CVEs were recorded.

RESULTS

Median TtTR was 8.0days (interquartile range 5.0-18.0). Patients with high TtTR (ie, >75th percentile) were more likely to be in AF than in sinus rhythm at entry (odds ratio [OR]: 1.423, P=.011). Median TiTR was 60.0%; low TiTR (below median) was associated with SAMe-TT₂R₂ score (OR: 1.175, P=.001), high TtTR (>75th percentile, OR: 1.357, P=.017), and number of international normalized ratio checks (OR: 0.998, P=.049). We recorded 113 CVEs (3.1%/y), with a higher rate seen in patients with TtTR >75th percentile compared to those below (log-rank test, P=.006). A multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that SAMe-TT₂R₂ score (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.331, P<.001), TtTR >75th percentile (HR: 1.505, P=.047), TiTR <70% (HR: 1.931, P=.004), number of international normalized ratio checks (HR: 0.988, P<.001), digoxin (HR: 1.855, P=.008), and proton-pump inhibitors (HR: 0.452, P<.001) were independently associated with CVEs.

CONCLUSIONS

High TtTR is associated with poorer long-term quality of VKAs therapy. Patients with TtTR >18days or with high SAMe-TT₂R₂ score should be considered for treatment with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants.

Proton-pump inhibitors: understanding the complications and risks

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective therapy for the full spectrum of gastric-acid-related diseases. However, in the past decade, a steadily increasing list of complications following long-term use of PPIs has been reported. Their potent acid-suppressive action induces several structural and functional changes within the gastric mucosa, including fundic gland polyps, enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia and hypergastrinaemia, which can be exaggerated in the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection. As discussed in this Review, most associations of PPIs with severe adverse events are not based on sufficient evidence because of confounding factors and a lack of plausible mechanisms. Thus, a causal relationship remains unproven in most associations, and further studies are needed. Awareness of PPI-associated risks should not lead to anxiety in patients but rather should induce the physician to consider the appropriate dosing and duration of PPI therapy, including long-term monitoring strategies in selected groups of patients because of their individual comorbidities and risk factors.

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors With Reduced Risk of Warfarin-Related Serious Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might reduce the risk of serious warfarin-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding, but the evidence of their efficacy for this indication is limited. A gastroprotective effect of PPIs would be particularly important for patients who take warfarin with antiplatelet drugs or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which further increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of patients beginning warfarin treatment in Tennessee Medicaid and the 5% National Medicare Sample identified 97,430 new episodes of warfarin treatment with 75,720 person-years of follow-up. The study end points were hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal bleeding potentially preventable by PPIs and for bleeding at other sites.

RESULTS

Patients who took warfarin without PPI co-therapy had 119 hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal bleeding per 10,000 person-years of treatment. The risk decreased by 24% among patients who received PPI co-therapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.91). There was no significant reduction in the risk of other gastrointestinal bleeding hospitalizations (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94-1.22) or non-gastrointestinal bleeding hospitalizations (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84-1.15) in this group. Among patients concurrently using antiplatelet drugs or NSAIDs, those without PPI co-therapy had 284 upper gastrointestinal bleeding hospitalizations per 10,000 person-years of warfarin treatment. The risk decreased by 45% (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77) with PPI co-therapy. PPI co-therapy had no significant protective effect for warfarin patients not using antiplatelet drugs or NSAIDs (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.06). Findings were similar in both study populations.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of patients beginning warfarin treatment in Tennessee Medicaid and the 5% National Medicare Sample, PPI co-therapy was associated with reduced risk of warfarin-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding; the greatest reduction occurred in patients also taking antiplatelet drugs or NSAIDs.