Individualized Vancomycin Dosing in Obese Patients: A Two-Sample Measurement Approach Improves Target Attainment

Characterizing Day 1 Area Under the Curve Following Vancomycin Loading Dose Administration in Adult Hospitalized Patients Using Non-Trapezoidal Linear Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a serious threat to public health. Vancomycin (VAN) remains the primary treatment for these infections, and achieving the recommended area under the curve (AUC) target has been linked to improved clinical outcomes. The current VAN therapeutic monitoring guidelines recommend a loading dose (LD) of 20-35 mg/kg to rapidly attain targeted VAN exposures within 24 h of therapy. However, there is a paucity of data describing the impact of VAN LD on day 1 area under the curve (AUC0-24). This study aims to employ pharmacokinetic (PK) equations to calculate and describe the AUC0-24 following a VAN LD of 20 mg/kg.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients who were loaded with VAN 20 mg/kg, received ≥ 48 h of treatment, and had two consecutive serum VAN levels collected within 24 h. Linear, non-trapezoidal PK equations and two post-infusion VAN levels were used to calculate AUC0-24. Therapeutic AUC0-24 was defined as 400-600 mg/l*h.

RESULTS

Among 123 included patients, the median age was 46 years (IQR 36, 62), 54% (67/123) of the patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 and 27% (33/123) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Following a LD of 20 mg/kg, 50% (61/123) of the patients met the therapeutic AUC0-24, while 22% (27/123) of the patients were subtherapeutic, and 28% (35/123) were supratherapeutic. Compared with patients who achieved therapeutic AUC0-24, patients with subtherapeutic AUC0-24 were more likely to be younger (44 vs. 37 years old) and have a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (67 vs. 52%). In contrast, patients with supratherapeutic AUC0-24 were more likely to be older (64 vs. 44 years old) and to have chronic kidney disease diagnosis (23 vs. 7%) when compared to patients who achieved a therapeutic AUC0-24. CONCLUSIONS: Only 50% of patients achieve the target AUC0-24 following a VAN 20 mg/kg LD, with younger, heavier patients underexposed and older patients with renal impairment overexposed, suggesting that different dosing strategies are needed for these populations.

Vancomycin population pharmacokinetics and dosing proposal for the initial treatment in obese adult patients

Aim

The aim of this study was to develop a vancomycin population pharmacokinetic model in adult obese patients and propose covariate-based dosing individualization in order to maximize the achievement of the newly recommended PK/PD target, according to a revised consensus guideline from 2020.

Methods

Therapeutic drug monitoring data from initial vancomycin therapy (first 3 days of treatment) in adult obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) patients from 2013 to 2022 were analyzed using a non-linear mixed-effects modeling method, and Monte Carlo simulations were then used to find the optimal dosage maximizing the PK/PD target attainment.

Results

A total of 147 vancomycin serum levels obtained from 138 patients were included in the analysis. Based on the covariate model diagnosis among all tested variables, no reliable predictor of vancomycin volume of distribution (Vd) was identified, while clearance (CL) was positively correlated with eGFR and lean body mass. Creatinine-based eGFR predicted vancomycin CL better than cystatin C-based eGFR. The median (interquartile range) value from conditional modes of individual estimates of Vd, CL, and elimination half-life in our population was 74.0 (70.5-75.4) L, 6.65 (4.95-8.42) L/h, and 7.7 (6.0-10.0) h, respectively.

Conclusion

We proposed dosing individualization based on the covariate found in order to maximize the achievement of the newly recommended PK/PD target of the AUC/MIC ratio of 400-600. Clinical pharmacy/pharmacology interventions may lead to an improvement in vancomycin dosing with a reflection in PK/PD target attainment.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antimicrobials in Critically Ill Obese Patients

Obesity is a significant global public health concern that is associated with an elevated risk of comorbidities as well as severe postoperative and nosocomial infections. The treatment of infections in critically ill obese patients can be challenging because obesity affects the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics, leading to an increased risk of antibiotic therapy failure and toxicity due to inappropriate dosages. Precision dosing of antibiotics using therapeutic drug monitoring may help to improve the management of this patient population. This narrative review outlines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes that result from obesity and provides a comprehensive critical review of the current available data on dosage adjustment of antibiotics in critically ill obese patients.

Comprehensive guidance for antibiotic dosing in obese adults: 2022 update

Drug dosing in obese patients continues to be challenging due to a lack of high-quality evidence to guide dosing recommendations. We first published guidance for antibiotic dosing in obese adults in 2017, in which we critically reviewed articles identified from a broad search strategy to develop dosing recommendations for 35 antimicrobials. In this updated narrative review, we searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using Medical Subject Headings including anti-infectives, specific generic antimicrobial names, obese, pharmacokinetics, and others. We reviewed 393 articles, cross-referenced select cited references, and when applicable, referenced drug databases, package inserts, and clinical trial data to update dosing recommendations for 41 antimicrobials. Most included articles were pharmacokinetic studies, other less frequently included articles were clinical studies (mostly small, retrospective), case reports, and very rarely, guidelines. Pharmacokinetic changes are frequently reported, can be variable, and sometimes conflicting in this population, and do not always translate to a documented difference in clinical outcomes, yet are used to inform dosing strategies. Extended infusions, high doses, and therapeutic drug monitoring remain important strategies to optimize dosing in this population. Additional studies are needed to clinically validate proposed dosing strategies, clarify optimal body size descriptors, dosing weight scalars, and estimation method of renal function in obese patients.

Doing More With Less: Pragmatic Implementation of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) Monitoring

Universal area-under-the-curve (AUC) guided vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is resource-intensive, cost-prohibitive, and presents a paradigm shift that leaves institutions with the quandary of defining the preferred and most practical method for TDM. We report a step-by-step quality improvement process using 4 plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles to provide a framework for development of a hybrid model of trough and AUC-based vancomycin monitoring. We found trough-based monitoring a pragmatic strategy as a first-tier approach when anticipated use is short-term. AUC-guided monitoring was most impactful and cost-effective when reserved for patients with high-risk for nephrotoxicity. We encourage others to consider quality improvement tools to locally adopt AUC-based monitoring.

Dose optimization of vancomycin in obese patients: A systematic review

Background: Dose optimization of vancomycin plays a substantial role in drug pharmacokinetics because of the increased incidence of obesity worldwide. This systematic review was aimed to highlight the current dosing strategy of vancomycin among obese patients. Methods: This systematic review was in concordance with Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was carried out on various databases such as Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect and EMBASE using Keywords and MeSH terms related to vancomycin dosing among obese patients. Google Scholar was also searched for additional articles. The English language articles published after January, 2000 were included in this study. The quality of the study was assessed using different assessment tools for cohort, and case reports. Results: A total of 1,029 records were identified. After screening, 18 studies were included for the final review. Of total, twelve studies are retrospective and remaining six are case-control studies. A total of eight studies were conducted in pediatrics while remaining studies were conducted in adult population. Most of the studies reported the dosing interval every 6-8 h. Differences in target trough concentration exist with respect to target ranges. The administration of loading dose (20-25 mg/kg) followed by maintenance dose (15-25 mg/kg) of vancomycin is recommended in adult patients to target therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, a dose of 40-60 mg/kg/day appears appropriate for pediatric patients. Conclusion: The initial dosing of vancomycin based on TBW could be better predictor of vancomycin trough concentration. However, the clinical significance is uncertain. Therefore, more studies are needed to evaluate the dosing strategy of vancomycin in overweight or obese patients.

Vancomycin dosing in patients with obesity

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Review and evaluation of vancomycin dosing guidelines for obese individuals

INTRODUCTION

Vancomycin dosing decisions are informed by factors such as body weight and renal function. It is important to understand the impact of obesity on vancomycin pharmacokinetics and how this may influence dosing decisions. Vancomycin dosing guidelines use varied descriptors of body weight and renal function. There is uncertainty whether current dosing guidelines result in attainment of therapeutic targets in obese individuals.

AREAS COVERED

Literature was explored using PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for articles from January 1980 to July 2021 regarding obesity-driven physiological changes, their influence on vancomycin pharmacokinetics and body size descriptors and renal function calculations in vancomycin dosing. Pharmacokinetic simulations reflective of international vancomycin dosing guidelines were conducted to evaluate the ability of using total, ideal and adjusted body weight, as well as Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI equations to attain an area-under-the-curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC₂₄/MIC) target (400-650) in obese individuals.

EXPERT OPINION

Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in obese individuals remains debated. Guidelines that determine loading doses using total body weight, and maintenance doses adjusted based on renal function and adjusted body weight, may be most appropriate for obese individuals. Use of ideal body weight leads to subtherapeutic vancomycin exposure and underestimation of renal function.

Body Mass Index of Elderly Patients with Normal Renal Function as a Determining Factor for Initial Vancomycin Regimen Designing

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the use of actual body weight is recommended for dosing in vancomycin regimen designs and it is important to perform therapeutic drug monitoring for efficacy and safety. However, the method to determine the appropriate vancomycin regimen for underweight or obese patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the relationship among vancomycin doses, trough concentration, and area under the curve (AUC). In addition, we identified the group of patients who were potentially more affected by BMI and evaluated the optimal dosing regimen to achieve the target AUC.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 462 patients who received vancomycin at the Osaka City University Hospital between January 2013 and September 2019. Patients were classified by their BMI group (underweight < 18.5, normal weight 18.5-25.0, and obese ≥ 25.0 kg/m2). We assessed the association between vancomycin dose versus trough concentration or AUC as well as dose-adjusted trough concentration and AUC in each BMI subgroup to determine the doses for achieving the target AUC.

RESULTS

The dose-adjusted trough concentration and AUC in elderly patients with normal renal function appeared to increase significantly with an increase in BMI (P < 0.05). Vancomycin doses that enabled the achievement of AUC400 in elderly patients with normal renal function decreased with increasing BMI: 17.7, 15.8, and 12.9 mg/kg per time in the underweight, normal weight, and obesity groups, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with normal renal function were the most affected by BMI on vancomycin trough concentration and AUC. The vancomycin regimen design in these patients should be adjusted carefully, not only based on the patient's renal function but also based on BMI.

Evaluation Of Individualized Cefepime Dosing Strategy Using Population Pharmacokinetics

The use of population pharmacokinetics (PK) to optimize cefepime dosing could be an effective strategy, given the increasing prevalence of resistant gram-negative organisms. The objective of this study is to retrospectively compare dosing using PK approach (intervention) versus traditional dosing (control) for cefepime in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Adult hospitalized patients with HAP or VAP receiving cefepime for ≥ 72 hours were screened first from August 2018 to January 2019 to be included in the intervention group, then screened during the pre-intervention period from August 2017 to July 2018 for the control group. Clinical improvement on day 7 of cefepime therapy was achieved in 72 % of the patients in the intervention group and 70 % of the patients in the control group (p = 0.8110). However, the clinical cure rate in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (50 vs. 36.5 %, p = 0.0034). Cefepime dosing using population PK appears to be a novel, effective, and safe dosing strategy for patients with HAP or VAP. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Vancomycin Advanced Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Exercise in Futility or Virtuous Endeavor to Improve Drug Efficacy and Safety?

Vancomycin is commonly prescribed to hospitalized patients. Decades of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic research culminated in recommendations to monitor the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the minimum inhibitory concentration in order to optimize vancomycin exposure and minimize toxicity in the revised 2020 guidelines. These guideline recommendations are based on limited data without high-quality evidence and limitations in strength. Despite considerable effort placed on vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), clinicians should recognize that the majority of vancomycin use is empiric. Most patients prescribed empiric vancomycin do not require it beyond a few days. For these patients, AUC determinations during the initial days of vancomycin exposure are futile. This added workload may detract from high-level patient care activities. Loading doses likely achieve AUC targets, so AUC monitoring after a loading dose is largely unnecessary for broad application. The excessive vancomycin TDM for decades has been propagated with limitations in evidence, and it should raise caution on contemporary vancomycin TDM recommendations.

Individualized Vancomycin Dosing with Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacokinetic Consultation Service: A Large-Scale Retrospective Observational Study

Background

To date, outcome data with a large sample size and data regarding the clinical outcomes of pharmacokinetic-guided (PK) dosing of vancomycin are limited.

Aim

We evaluated the pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes of a PK-guided dosing advisory program, pharmacokinetic consultation service (PKCS), in vancomycin treatment.

Methods

We investigated vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and PKCS use through a retrospective review of patients who had serum vancomycin trough concentration data from October 2017 to November 2018. Among these patients, we selected non-critically ill adult patients satisfying our selection criteria to evaluate the effect of PKCS. Target trough attainment rate, time to target attainment, vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity (VIN), vancomycin treatment failure rate, and duration of vancomycin therapy were compared between patients whose dosing was adjusted according to PKCS (PKCS group), and those whose dose was adjusted at the discretion of the attending physician (non-PKCS group).

Results

A total of 280 patients met the selection criteria for the VIN analysis (PKCS, n=134; non-PKCS, n=146). The incidence of VIN was similar between the two groups (PKCS, n=5; non-PKCS, n=5); however, the target attainment rate was higher in the PKCS group (75% vs 60%, P = 0.012). The time to target attainment was similar between the two groups. Further exclusions yielded 112 patients for the clinical outcome evaluation (PKCS, n=51; non-PKCS, n=61). The treatment failure rate was similar, and the duration of vancomycin therapy was longer in the PKCS group (12 vs 8 days, P = 0.008).

Conclusion

In non-critically ill patients, an increase in target trough achieved by PKCS did not lead to decreased vancomycin treatment failures, shorter vancomycin treatment, or decreased nephrotoxicity in vancomycin treatment. Considering the excessive amount of effort currently put into vancomycin dosing and monitoring, more selective criteria for individualized pharmacokinetic-guided dosing needs to be applied.

Vancomycin: Audit of American guideline-based intermittent dose administration with focus on overweight patients

AIMS

Vancomycin dosing and monitoring recommendations are poorly adhered to in many institutions internationally, with concerns of treatment failure and propelling antibiotic resistance. The primary aim of this study was to audit the rate of adherence to American guidelines, with particular interest in loading dose administration. The secondary aims were (i) to determine whether or not guideline adherence results in therapeutic concentrations across body mass index (BMI) groups and (ii) to determine whether or not this was in turn associated with morbidity and hospital mortality.

METHOD

Data were collected in a single tertiary hospital on all patients who had two or more serum vancomycin concentrations measured.

RESULT

In total, 107 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 38.3% of patients were commenced on guideline adherent vancomycin doses, and 28.3% of overweight patients received an adherent first dose compared to 51.1% of non-overweight people (difference 23%, 95% CI 4% to 41%, P = 0.024). Overweight patients were more frequently underdosed compared to non-overweight patients (P = 0.039). The frequency and proportion of underdosing increased with BMI. Overweight patients spent a smaller fraction of their course within the therapeutic range, although the difference was not statistically significant (difference 7.7%; 95% CI 4% to 19.4%; P = 0.195). The overweight group had longer hospital length of stay (LOS), higher mortality and more treatment failures.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to guideline-based prescription is poor, particularly in overweight patients. Patients who are initially underdosed have fewer therapeutic vancomycin days, regardless of BMI. Overweight patients have increased hospital LOS, hospital mortality and treatment failure.

Vancomycin volume of distribution estimation in adults with class III obesity

PURPOSE

To compare methods of estimating vancomycin volume of distribution (V) in adults with class III obesity.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter pharmacokinetic analysis of adults treated with vancomycin and monitored through measurement of peak and trough concentrations was performed. Individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were obtained via maximum a posteriori Bayesian analysis. The relationship between V and body weight was assessed using linear regression. Mean bias and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were calculated to assess the precision of multiple methods of estimating V.

RESULTS

Of 241 patients included in the study sample, 159 (66.0%) had a body mass index (BMI) of 40.0-49.9 kg/m2, and 82 (34.0%) had a BMI of ≥50.0 kg/m2. The median (5th, 95th percentile) weight of patients was 136 (103, 204) kg, and baseline characteristics were similar between BMI groups. The mean ± S.D. V was lower in patients with a BMI of 40.0-49.9 kg/m2 than in those with a BMI of ≥50.0 kg/m2 (72.4 ± 19.6 L versus 79.3 ± 20.6 L, p = 0.009); however, body size poorly predicted V in regression analyses (R2 < 0.20). A fixed estimate of V (75 L) and use of a weight-based value (0.52 L/kg by total body weight [TBW]) yielded similar bias and error in this population.

CONCLUSION

Results of the largest analysis of vancomycin V in class III obesity to date indicated that use of a fixed V value (75 L) and use of a TBW-based estimate (0.52 L/kg) for estimation of vancomycin V in patients with a BMI of ≥40.0 kg/m2 have similar bias. Two postdistribution vancomycin concentrations are needed to accurately determine patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters, estimate area under the curve, and improve the precision of vancomycin dosing in this patient population.

An AUC Target Simulation for Vancomycin in Patients With Class III Obesity

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this simulation is to compare 24-hour vancomycin (Vanc₂₄) dosage requirements between a target area under the curve (AUC) versus a target trough approach in patients with class III obesity.

METHODS

Adult patients were included if they received vancomycin in accordance with the University of Vermont Medical Center's class III obesity dosage protocol from June 2016 through December 2018. Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each patient using the Sawchuck-Zaske method. For this simulation, Vanc₂₄ dosages were calculated to achieve an AUC of 400 mg/L h and a trough concentration of 15 mg/L.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients had Vanc₂₄ dosage requirements calculated. The median age was 59 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 51.5-68), body mass index (BMI): 45.7 kg/m² (IQR: 42.4-51.5), and 50.7% were male. The mean Vanc₂₄ dosage requirements were 3995 mg (standard deviation [SD] ±1673) in the target trough approach versus 2783 mg (SD ±1149) in the target AUC approach (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

A target AUC approach required less vancomycin over a 24-hour time period relative to a target trough approach. Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring that explicitly targets AUC may reduce vancomycin exposure and potentially decrease the risk of nephrotoxicity in patients with class III obesity.

The Benefit of Individualized Vancomycin Dosing Via Pharmacokinetic Tools: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Various pharmacokinetic (PK) equations and software have been developed to individualize vancomycin dosing. However, the benefit of using any PK information to guide vancomycin dosing has not been fully elucidated. Objective: To appraise available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of individualized vancomycin dosing via PK tools. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and 2 Chinese literature databases were searched through August 1, 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that reported the PK and clinical outcomes of individualized vancomycin dosing versus empirical dosing were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results: A total of 21 studies involving 4346 patients were finally included, of which 3 were RCTs and 18 were cohort studies. Meta-analysis revealed that PK-guided vancomycin dosing significantly increased the attainment of target trough concentration (RR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.49-1.70) and decreased the incidence of nephrotoxicity (RR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.46-0.71). Additionally, the available evidence showed that target area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration attainment rate and time to target concentration could improve. However, the evidence on clinical outcomes was scarce, and no significant differences were detected in clinical response rate, microbiological eradication rate, mortality, and length of hospital stay between PK-guided vancomycin dosing and empirical dosing strategies. Conclusion and Relevance: Individualized vancomycin dosing via PK tools significantly increases the attainment of target trough concentration and decreases the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Evidence on clinical effectiveness was limited and showed no significant benefit. Further well-designed studies are warranted to assess its clinical effectiveness and inform routine care.

Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Peak-Trough-Based Versus Trough-Based Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Approaches: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is based on achieving 24-h area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration cure breakpoints (AUC24/MIC). Approaches to vancomycin TDM vary, with no head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparisons to date.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare clinical and pharmacokinetic outcomes between peak-trough-based and trough-only-based vancomycin TDM approaches and to determine the relationship between vancomycin AUC24/MIC and cure rates.

METHODS

A multicentered pragmatic parallel-group RCT was conducted in Hamad Medical Corporation hospitals in Qatar. Adult non-dialysis patients initiated on vancomycin were randomized to peak-trough-based or trough-only-based vancomycin TDM. Primary endpoints included vancomycin AUC24/MIC ratio breakpoint for cure and clinical effectiveness (therapeutic cure vs therapeutic failure). Descriptive, inferential, and classification and regression tree (CART) statistical analyses were applied. NONMEM.v.7.3 was used to conduct population pharmacokinetic analyses and AUC24 calculations.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were enrolled [trough-only-based-TDM (n = 35) and peak-trough-based-TDM (n = 30)]. Peak-trough-based TDM was significantly associated with higher therapeutic cure rates compared to trough-only-based TDM [76.7% vs 48.6%; p value = 0.02]. No statistically significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality, neutropenia, or nephrotoxicity between the two groups. Compared to trough-only-based TDM, peak-trough-based TDM was associated with less vancomycin total daily doses by 12.05 mg/kg/day (p value = 0.027). CART identified creatinine clearance (CLCR), AUC24/MIC, and TDM approach as significant determinants of therapeutic outcomes. All patients [n = 19,100%] with CLCR ≤ 7.85 L/h, AUC24/MIC ≤ 1256, who received peak-trough-based TDM achieved therapeutic cure. AUC24/MIC > 565 was identified to be correlated with cure in trough-only-based TDM recipients [n = 11,84.6%]. No minimum AUC24/MIC breakpoint was detected by CART in the peak-trough-based group.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance of target vancomycin exposures and implementation of peak-trough-based vancomycin TDM may improve vancomycin-associated cure rates. Larger scale RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.

Evaluation for optimal dosing of vancomycin in patients with different physical types

The sufficient dose to obtain an optimal trough concentration of vancomycin (VCM) in patients with non-standard physical types remains controversial. In this study, we examined the relationship between the dose and physical type in patients in whom an optimal trough concentration was obtained among VCM-treated patients. We retrospectively investigated the dose of VCM and physical type in patients treated with VCM between January 2012 and January 2017 at two medical institutions (n = 272). The physical type was classified using the body mass index (BMI). Patients with a BMI of <18.5 kg/m² were assigned to the lean group, those with a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m² were assigned to the standard group, and those with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m² were assigned to the obesity group. The mean doses of VCM per time (mg/kg) to achieve the target trough concentration of VCM, 15-20 μg/mL, were 19.8 ± 4.3, 16.5 ± 3.7, and 13.7 ± 2.7 mg/kg in the lean, standard, and obesity groups, respectively. The dose per time to achieve the target trough concentration decreased significantly in association with an increase of BMI. The upper limit of the recommended dose (15-20 mg/kg) or higher in lean patients, and the lower dose in obese patients than the recommended dose might be appropriate to achieve the target trough concentration when we calculated the dose per time based on actual body weight.

Conversion from Vancomycin Trough Concentration-Guided Dosing to Area Under the Curve-Guided Dosing Using Two Sample Measurements in Adults: Implementation at an Academic Medical Center

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The optimal pharmacodynamic parameter for the prediction of efficacy of vancomycin is the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and current published data indicate that dosing based on vancomycin trough concentrations is an inaccurate substitute. In this study, our objective was to compare the achievement of therapeutic target attainment after switching from a trough-based to an AUC-based dosing strategy as a part of our institution's vancomycin-per-pharmacy protocol.

DESIGN

Prospective observational quality assurance study.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 296 hospitalized adults who received vancomycin and monitoring under our institution's vancomycin-per-pharmacy protocol were included in the analysis. The preimplementation retrospective comparison group consisted of 179 patients in whom vancomycin was initiated using a trough-based dosing strategy between November 22, 2017, and January 22, 2018. The postimplementation group included 117 patients in whom vancomycin was initiated using an AUC-based dosing strategy using two-point sampling between June 19, 2018, and July 19, 2018, after hospital-wide implementation of this protocol on June 19, 2018.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

AUC values were calculated from two vancomycin concentrations (peak and trough). The primary outcome was achievement of therapeutic AUC values (400-800 mg·hr/L) in the postimplementation group or therapeutic trough level values (10-20 mg/L) in the preimplementation group. Only 98 (55%) of 179 initial trough values were therapeutic in the preimplementation group (trough-only dosing method) versus 86 (73.5%) of 117 initial AUC values in the postimplementation group (AUC-based dosing method) (p=0.0014). A lower proportion of supratherapeutic AUC values was observed in the postimplementation group compared with supratherapeutic trough concentrations in the preimplementation group (1.7% vs 18%, p<0.0001). Overall, 62% of patients with initially therapeutic AUC values had subsequent trough value increases of 25% or greater, occurring at a median of 6 days of vancomycin therapy. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 11% of patients in the preimplementation versus 9.4% in the postimplementation group (p=0.70).

CONCLUSION

Compared with a trough concentration-based dosing strategy, AUC-based dosing using two-point sampling improved therapeutic target attainment. Implementation is feasible at any hospital that performs vancomycin peak concentration testing and is a workable alternative to using Bayesian software for estimating AUC. This approach should also be directly compared with AUC-based dosing using Bayesian software.

An Evaluation of Vancomycin Area Under the Curve Estimation Methods for Children Treated for Acute Pulmonary Exacerbations of Cystic Fibrosis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The prevalence of pulmonary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has increased over the last 2 decades. Two concentrations-a postdistributive and a trough-are currently used to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) of vancomycin, an antibiotic routinely used to treat these infections, to achieve the target AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration of ≥400 mg·h/L in ensuring optimal dosing of this drug. This study evaluated precision and bias in estimating vancomycin AUCs obtained either from a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model by using a single trough concentration or from standard PK equation-based 2-point monitoring approach. AUCs were either obtained from a single trough concentration-fitted model or derived from a model fitted by 2 concentration points. Children ≥2 years of age with CF received intravenous vancomycin at 2 centers from June 2012 to December 2014. A population PK model was developed in Pmetrics to quantify the between-subject variability in vancomycin PK parameters, define the sources of PK variability, and leverage information from the population to improve individual AUC estimates. Twenty-three children with CF received 27 courses of vancomycin. The median age was 12.3 (interquartile range [IQR] 8.5-16.6) years. From the individual vancomycin PK parameter estimates from the population PK model, median AUC was 622 (IQR 529-680) mg·h/L. Values were not significantly different from the AUC calculated using the standard PK equation-based approach (median 616 [IQR 540-663] mg·h/L) (P = .89). A standard PK equation-based approach using 2 concentrations and a population PK model-based approach using a single trough concentration yielded unbiased and precise AUC estimates. Findings suggest that options exist to implement AUC-based pediatric vancomycin dosing in patients with CF. The findings of this study reveal that several excellent options exist for centers to implement AUC-based pediatric vancomycin dosing for patients with CF.

Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring and population pharmacokinetic models in special patient subpopulations

Vancomycin is a fundamental antibiotic in the management of severe Gram-positive infections. Inappropriate vancomycin dosing is associated with therapeutic failure, bacterial resistance and toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is acknowledged as an important part of the vancomycin therapy management, at least in specific patient subpopulations, but implementation in clinical practice has been difficult because there are no consensus and agglutinator documents. The aims of the present work are to present an overview of the current knowledge on vancomycin TDM and population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models relevant to specific patient subpopulations. Based on three published international guidelines (American, Japanese and Chinese) on vancomycin TDM and a bibliographic review on available PPK models for vancomycin in distinct subpopulations, an analysis of evidence was carried out and the current knowledge on this topic was summarized. The results of this work can be useful to redirect research efforts to address the detected knowledge gaps. Currently, TDM of vancomycin presents a moderate level of evidence and practical recommendations with great robustness in neonates, pediatric and patients with renal impairment. However, it is important to investigate in other subpopulations known to present altered vancomycin pharmacokinetics (eg neurosurgical, oncological and cystic fibrosis patients), where evidence is still unsufficient.

Individualized Pharmacokinetic Dosing of Vancomycin Reduces Time to Therapeutic Trough Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients

Dosing vancomycin in critically ill patients often results in subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic trough concentrations. In this retrospective study, we compared the time to goal trough attainment and incidence of acute kidney injury in intensive care unit (ICU) patients whose vancomycin was dosed by a pharmacy pharmacokinetic (PK) dosing and monitoring service to the standard of care. Three-hundred fifty adult ICU patients at a Level 1 trauma, teaching hospital who received vancomycin for >24 hours from February 1, 2016, to November 30, 2016, were screened. Patients were included in the PK group if consecutive serum concentrations were used to calculate individualized PK and determine a dosing regimen. Patients who were dosed using troughs only were then matched 1-to-1 to the PK group by date of vancomycin initiation and included in the traditional group. Fifty patients were included in each group. Baseline characteristics were similar, except the PK group had more patients under the care of the neuromedical ICU service (42% vs 18%; P = .02) and fewer patients with a corrected creatinine clearance <30 mL/min/1.73 m² (22% vs 46%; P = .02). Attainment of goal trough concentrations for the PK and traditional groups were 84.4% and 29.4% by 48 hours (P = .0001), 88.4% and 60.7% by 72 hours (P = .009), and 92.9% and 77.8% by 96 hours (P = .1), respectively. Incidence of acute kidney injury between the PK and traditional groups was not statistically significant (8.3% vs 14%; P = .5). Utilization of individualized pharmacokinetic dosing of vancomycin in critically ill patients resulted in faster goal trough attainment without an increase in nephrotoxicity.

Assessing Vancomycin Dosing Per Pharmacy in Elderly Patients Over the Age of 74 Years

Vancomycin has a complex pharmacokinetic profile and carries potential risks for nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. The pharmacokinetic profile in elderly patients significantly differs from that of younger patients. It is common practice in many institutions for pharmacists to intentionally round serum creatinine levels to 1 mg/dl in elderly patients with levels <1 mg/dl to avoid overestimating clearance and toxicities. This can potentially lead to underestimation of creatinine clearance, and subsequently lead to vancomycin under dosing. The aim of this study was to evaluate vancomycin target trough attainment and the time to trough attainment with vancomycin dosing per pharmacy in elderly patients. Methods In this retrospective study, patients 75 years and older who received vancomycin at our institution were evaluated. Subjects were included in the study if they were at least 75 years of age, received intravenous vancomycin therapy, and had a vancomycin trough drawn after the third dose. The study patients were divided into three serum creatinine groups; <0.8 mg/dl (LSCr), 0.8–0.9 mg/dl (MSCr), and ≥1 mg/dl (HSCr). Patients were excluded from the study if they did not meet inclusion criteria, had no trough levels drawn, or were <75 years of age. Results Two hundred and four patients 75 years or older were included in the study. The target trough attainment was highest in the HSCr group (n = 37, 80%), which was significantly higher than the LSCr (n=21, 31%; p<0.0001) and MSCr (n=42, 46%; p<0.0001) groups. The time to target trough goals (days, mean ± SD) differed between the three groups, with the LSCr group taking the longest duration: LSCr: 5.14 ± 2.5; MSCr: 3.74 ± 1.1; HSCr: 3.78 ± 1.6, p=0.005. Conclusion Adjustments need to be done to improve vancomycin dosing per pharmacy in patients 75 years of age and older. This study shows that LSCr patients (<0.8 mg/dl) had the lowest rates of target trough level attainment. Intentionally rounding serum creatinine to 1 mg/dl if values are less when estimating renal function in this older patient population may not be predictive of true renal function and can decrease the likelihood of target attainment or increase time to target attainment.

The Impact of AUC-Based Monitoring on Pharmacist-Directed Vancomycin Dose Adjustments in Complicated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the impact of area under the curve (AUC)-based vancomycin monitoring on pharmacist-initiated dose adjustments after transitioning from a trough-only to an AUC-based monitoring method at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients treated with vancomycin for complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection between November 2013 and December 2016 was conducted. The frequency of pharmacist-initiated dose adjustments was assessed for patients monitored via trough-only and AUC-based approaches for trough ranges: 10 to 14.9 mg/L and 15 to 20 mg/L.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included: 36 in the trough-based monitoring and 14 in the AUC-based-monitoring group. The vancomycin dose was increased in 71.4% of patients when troughs were 10 to 14.9 mg/L when a trough-only approach was used and in only 25% of patients when using AUC estimation (P = .048). In the AUC group, the dose was increased only when AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <400; unchanged regimens had an estimated AUC/MIC ≥400. The AUC-based monitoring did not significantly increase the frequency of dose reductions when trough concentrations were 15 to 20 mg/L (AUC: 33.3% vs trough: 4.6%; P = .107).

CONCLUSIONS

The AUC-based monitoring resulted in fewer patients with dose adjustments when trough levels were 10 to 14.9 mg/L. The AUC-based monitoring has the potential to reduce unnecessary vancomycin exposure and warrants further investigation.

Vancomycin Dosing in Obese Patients: Special Considerations and Novel Dosing Strategies

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding vancomycin pharmacokinetics in obese patients and strategies used to improve dosing in this population.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE (1974 to November 2017), and Google Scholar searches were conducted using the search terms vancomycin, obese, obesity, pharmacokinetics, strategy, and dosing. Additional articles were selected from reference lists of selected studies.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Included articles were those published in English with a primary focus on vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters in obese patients and practical vancomycin dosing strategies, clinical experiences, or challenges of dosing vancomycin in this population.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Volume of distribution and clearance are the pharmacokinetic parameters that most often affect vancomycin dosing in obese patients; both are increased in this population. Challenges with dosing in obese patients include inconsistent and inadequate dosing, observations that the obese population may not be homogeneous, and reports of an increased likelihood of supratherapeutic trough concentrations. Investigators have revised and developed dosing and monitoring protocols to address these challenges. These approaches improved target trough attainment to varying degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Some of the vancomycin dosing approaches provided promising results in obese patients, but there were notable differences in methods used to develop these approaches, and sample sizes were small. Although some approaches can be considered for validation in individual institutions, further research is warranted. This may include validating approaches in larger populations with narrower obesity severity ranges, investigating target attainment in indication-specific target ranges, and evaluating the impact of different dosing weights and methods of creatinine clearance calculation.

Pilot Study of a Bayesian Approach To Estimate Vancomycin Exposure in Obese Patients with Limited Pharmacokinetic Sampling

This study evaluated the predictive performance of a Bayesian PK estimation method (ADAPT V) to estimate the 24-h vancomycin area under the curve (AUC) with limited pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling in adult obese patients receiving vancomycin for suspected or confirmed Gram-positive infections. This was an Albany Medical Center Institutional Review Board-approved prospective evaluation of 12 patients. Patients had a median (95% confidence interval) age of 61 years (39 to 71 years), a median creatinine clearance of 86 ml/min (75 to 120 ml/min), and a median body mass index of 45 kg/m² (40 to 52 kg/m²). For each patient, five PK concentrations were measured, and four different vancomycin population PK models were used as Bayesian priors to estimate the vancomycin AUC (AUC_FULL). Using each PK model as a prior, data-depleted PK subsets were used to estimate the 24-h AUC (i.e., peak and trough data [AUC_PT], midpoint and trough data [AUC_MT], and trough-only data [AUC_T]). The 24-h AUC derived from the full data set (AUC_FULL) was compared to the AUC derived from data-depleted subsets (AUC_PT, AUC_MT, and AUC_T) for each model. For the four sets of analyses, AUC_FULL estimates ranged from 437 to 489 mg·h/liter. The AUC_PT provided the best approximation of the AUC_FULL; AUC_MT and AUC_T tended to overestimate AUC_FULL Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of AUC monitoring in clinical practice, but the findings from this study suggest that the vancomycin AUC can be estimated with good precision and accuracy with limited PK sampling using Bayesian PK estimation software.

Peak Measurement for Vancomycin AUC Estimation in Obese Adults Improves Precision and Lowers Bias

Vancomycin area under the curve (AUC) estimates may be skewed in obese adults due to weight-dependent pharmacokinetic parameters. We demonstrate that peak and trough measurements reduce bias and improve the precision of vancomycin AUC estimates in obese adults (n = 75) and validate this in an independent cohort (n = 31). The precision and mean percent bias of Bayesian vancomycin AUC estimates are comparable between covariate-dependent (R² = 0.774, 3.55%) and covariate-independent (R² = 0.804, 3.28%) models when peaks and troughs are measured but not when measurements are restricted to troughs only (R² = 0.557, 15.5%).

New Regimen for Continuous Infusion of Vancomycin in Critically Ill Patients

Despite the development of new agents with activity against Gram-positive bacteria, vancomycin remains one of the primary antibiotics for critically ill septic patients. Because sepsis can alter antimicrobial pharmacokinetics, the development of an appropriate dosing strategy to provide adequate concentrations is crucial. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate a new dosing regimen of vancomycin given by continuous infusion (CI) to septic patients. We included all adult septic patients admitted to a mixed intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2012 and May 2013, who were treated with a new vancomycin CI regimen consisting of a loading dose of 35 mg/kg of body weight given as a 4-h infusion, followed by a daily CI dose adapted to creatinine clearance (CrCL), as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula (median dose, 2,112 [1,500 to 2,838] mg). Vancomycin concentrations were measured at the end of the loading dose (T1), at 12 h (T2), at 24 h (T3), and the day after the start of therapy (T4). Vancomycin concentrations of 20 to 30 mg/liter at T2, T3, and T4 were considered adequate. A total of 107 patients (72% male) were included. Median age, weight, and CrCL were 59 (interquartile range [IQR], 48 to 71) years, 75 (IQR, 65 to 85) kg, and 94 (IQR, 56 to 140) ml/min, respectively. Vancomycin concentrations were 44 (IQR, 37 to 49), 25 (IQR, 21 to 32), 22 (IQR, 19 to 28), and 26 (IQR, 22 to 29) mg/liter at T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. Concentrations were adequate in 56% (60/107) of patients at T2, in 54% (57/105) at T3, and in 73% (41/56) at T4. This vancomycin regimen permitted rapid attainment of target concentrations in serum for most patients. Concentrations were insufficient in only 16% of patients at 12 h of treatment.

Identification of Risk Factors for Initial Elevated Vancomyin Trough Concentrations

Background: Recent literature suggests that elevated vancomycin trough concentrations (>20 µg/mL) may be associated with an increased risk of nephrotoxicity and lead to an increase in mortality and hospital length of stay. Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify variables that may be predictive of elevated initial vancomycin trough concentrations. Methods: Retrospective case–control study of all adult patients who had an initial vancomycin trough concentration measured between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. Case patients had an initial trough concentration >20 µg/mL, while control patients had an initial trough concentration of ≤20 µg/mL. Patients were excluded from the study if they were in the intensive care unit, had unstable renal function, or if they had cystic fibrosis, solid organ transplant, or bone marrow transplant. Results: Of the 512 vancomycin trough concentrations reviewed, 54 patients met the case definition, while 140 patients were randomly selected as controls. In a multivariate model, baseline serum creatinine, body mass index, heart failure, and malignancy were all independently predictive of an initial vancomycin concentration >20 µg/mL. Conclusions: Reduced baseline renal function coupled with increasing body mass index is associated with an increased risk of an elevated initial vancomycin trough concentration. This risk is further enhanced by the presence of heart failure and/or malignancy. When these risk factors are present, it may be prudent to consider implementation of individualized dosing to achieve initial target concentrations.

Vancomycin Dosing Considerations in a Real-World Cohort of Obese and Extremely Obese Patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of empiric vancomycin dosing regimens on attainment of optimal target trough concentrations in obese (body mass index [BMI] 30-40 kg/m(2) ) and extremely obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2) ) patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

DATA SOURCE

National Veterans Affairs standardized databases.

PATIENTS

A total of 263 obese and 71 extremely obese (actual body weight range 72-244 kg in both groups) inpatients from all Veterans Affairs facilities nationally who had suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia and were treated with vancomycin between 2002 and 2012.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients with steady-state trough concentrations (measured ≤ 2 hours before the next vancomycin dose) and no evidence of acute kidney injury before vancomycin initiation were included. Logistic regression models were used to measure the effect of various vancomycin dosing regimens on attainment of optimal target trough concentrations (15-20 mg/L). The mean total daily vancomycin dose was lower in obese versus extremely obese patients (2005 ± 736 vs 2306 ± 934 mg, p<0.05). The mean weight-based daily dose was higher in obese patients (20 ± 7 vs 17 ± 7 mg/kg/day, p<0.05). In each group, ~ 20% of patients achieved optimal target trough concentrations. In obese patients, the standard dose of ~ 30 mg/kg/day was appropriate for target trough concentration attainment (odds ratio 5.15, 95% confidence interval 1.69-15.64). In extremely obese patients, a lower dosage of 20 to 25 mg/kg/day was appropriate for target trough concentration attainment (odds ratio 6.07, 95% confidence interval 1.01-36.51).

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, we offer additional consideration of vancomycin dosing in obese and extremely obese patients. Extremely obese patients may require a lower weight-based daily dose than obese patients to reach target vancomycin trough concentrations.