Assessment of gentamicin dosing and monitoring in neonates: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Gentamicin is a commonly used medication in NICUs. It is known to have ototoxic & nephrotoxic side effects. To date there is no consensus about dosing regimen in different institutions. Our study aims to evaluate the Neofax® dosing regimen for gentamicin in neonatal early onset sepsis in relation to trough level before the second dose and its association with the incidence of gentamicin side effects, namely hearing impairment/loss and acute kidney injury.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of newborns admitted to Tawam hospital NICU (June 2019-May 2020) who received gentamicin for early onset sepsis (≤72 hours old). Trough levels before the second dose at 24,36 and 48 hours were reviewed (≥1 mg/L is high). Excluded patients with renal risk factors. Side effects (hearing impairment, acute renal injury) were also assessed.

RESULTS

Total of 265 infants were included, among whom 149 patients received gentamicin at 24 hours interval, 99 at 36 and 17 at 48 hours interval. Trough level was high in 76% (P = 0.022), 65% (P = 0.127), and 53% (P = 0.108) of patients who received gentamicin at 24, 36, and 48 hours, respectively. Hearing screening was normal in 99.2% of patients, while 2 patients failed the test (Both with normal trough levels). No patients in our study developed renal injury related to gentamicin use.

CONCLUSION

Neofax® gentamicin dosing often results in high trough levels, especially in late preterm/term infants. This study found no correlation between high trough levels and hearing impairment upon discharge or acute kidney injury. Further studies with larger sample size are recommended.

Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Canadian Hospitals

Background

Little is known about the current landscape of vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in Canadian hospitals, which operate within publicly funded health care systems.

Objectives

To determine current TDM practices for vancomycin and associated challenges and to gather perceptions about TDM based on area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in Canadian hospitals.

Methods

An electronic survey was distributed to hospital pharmacists in spring 2021 through multiple national and provincial antimicrobial stewardship, public health, and pharmacy organizations. The survey gathered data about hospital characteristics, TDM methods, inclusion criteria for patient selection, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, vancomycin susceptibility testing and reporting, and perceived barriers and challenges.

Results

In total, 120 pharmacists from 10 of the 13 provincial and territorial jurisdictions in Canada, representing 12.5% of Canadian acute care hospitals (n = 962), completed at least 90% of survey questions. The predominant TDM method was trough-based (107/119, 89.9%); another 10.1% of respondents (12/119) reported performing AUC-based TDM (with or without trough-based TDM), and 17.9% (19/106) of those not already using AUC-based TDM were considering implementing it within 1 to 2 years. Among hospitals performing trough-based TDM, 60.5% (66/109) targeted trough levels between 15 and 20 mg/L for serious infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. One-quarter of the respondents using this method (27/109, 24.8%) agreed that trough-based TDM was of uncertain benefit, and about one-third (33/109, 30.3%) were neutral on this question. Multiple challenges were identified for trough-based TDM, including sub- or supra-therapeutic concentrations and collection of specimens at inappropriate times. Overall, 40.5% (47/116) of respondents agreed that AUC-based TDM was likely safer than trough-based TDM, whereas 23.3% (27/116) agreed that AUC-based TDM was likely more effective.

Conclusions

This survey represents a first step in developing evidence-based, standardized best practices for vancomycin TDM that are uniquely suited to the Canadian health care system.

Vancomycin area under the curve versus trough only guided dosing and the risk of acute kidney injury: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Vancomycin is commonly used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections and is known to cause nephrotoxicity. Previous Vancomycin Consensus Guidelines recommended targeting trough concentrations but the 2020 Guidelines suggest monitoring vancomycin area under the curve (AUC) given the reduced risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) at similar levels of efficacy. This meta-analysis compares vancomycin-induced AKI incidence using AUC-guided dosing strategies versus trough-based monitoring. Literature was queried from Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, and Google Scholar from database inception through November 5, 2021. Interventional or observational studies reporting the incidence of vancomycin-induced AKI between AUC- and trough-guided dosing strategies were included. In the primary analysis, the Vancomycin Consensus Guidelines definition for AKI was used if reported; otherwise, the Risk, Injury, and Failure; and Loss, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) or Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definitions were used. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was evaluated between the two strategies using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses for adjusted ORs and AKI definitions were performed. Heterogeneity was identified using Cochrane's Q test and I² statistics. A total of 10 studies with 4231 patients were included. AUC-guided dosing strategies were associated with significantly less vancomycin-induced AKI than trough-guided strategies [OR 0.625, 95% CI (0.469-0.834), p = 0.001; I²  = 25.476]. A subgroup analysis of three studies reporting adjusted ORs yielded similar results [OR 0.475, 95% CI (0.261-0.863), p = 0.015]. Stratification by AKI definition showed a significant reduction in AKI with the Vancomycin Consensus Guidelines definition [OR 0.552, 95% CI (0.341-0.894), p = 0.016] but failed to find significance in the alternative definitions. Area under the curve-guided dosing strategies are associated with a lower incidence of vancomycin-induced AKI versus trough-guided dosing strategies (GRADE, low). Limitations included the variety of AKI definitions and the potential for confounding bias.

Trough-Guided Versus AUC/MIC-Guided Vancomycin Monitoring: A Cost Analysis

PURPOSE

Recent vancomycin dosing and monitoring guidelines recommend monitoring vancomycin area under the 24-hour time-concentration curve instead of traditional trough-only monitoring. This study aimed to compare the total costs of vancomycin dosing and monitoring between trough-guided and AUC-guided approaches in a quaternary hospital from Brazil.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients were divided into 2 groups according to the monitoring method. Patients with previous renal impairment were excluded. Vancomycin AUC was estimated by using 2 steady-state serum concentrations and first-order kinetics equations. The primary outcome was total cost of vancomycin therapy and monitoring from the hospital perspective, which included costs of cumulative doses, laboratory fees, materials used in blood collection, nursing time for collection, and pharmacist time for result interpretation.

FINDINGS

A total of 68 patients were included in the AUC/MIC-guided monitoring group, and 76 patients were included in the trough-guided monitoring group. There were no significant differences between groups regarding baseline serum creatinine level, duration of vancomycin therapy, and cumulative vancomycin dose. The median (interquartile range) total vancomycin drug and monitoring cost was $298.32 ($153.81-$429.85) for the AUC/MIC-guided group compared with $285.59 ($198.81-$435.57) for the trough-guided group (P = 0.9658).

IMPLICATIONS

Vancomycin AUC estimation using 2 steady-state serum concentrations and first-order kinetics equations is a feasible alternative for limited-resource institutions that intend to transition from a trough approach to AUC/MIC-guided monitoring. (Clin Ther. 2022;44:XXX-XXX) © 2022 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Evaluation of Sirolimus Dosing in Neonates and Infants With Lymphatic Disorders: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

Literature in pediatric patients suggests dosing sirolimus 1.6 mg/m2/day divided twice daily for lymphatic disorders with limited evidence available for dosing in neonates and infants. The objective of this research was to determine the sirolimus dose required to achieve therapeutic trough concentrations in infants with lymphatic disorders at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

METHODS

This retrospective review included patients <1 year of age at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia who were initiated on sirolimus for lymphatic disorder. Patients were included if they received at least 5 days of consecutive sirolimus therapy prior to trough concentration monitoring. Measures of central tendency and variability were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients met criteria for inclusion. The median initial sirolimus dose was 1 mg/m2/day (IQR, 0.5-1.6 mg/m2/day). Fourteen patients (87.5%) achieved therapeutic trough concentrations on a median sirolimus dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day. Dosing frequency to achieve therapeutic trough concentrations included 1 patient (6.25%) on twice daily dosing, 12 patients (75%) on once daily dosing, and 1 patient (6.25%) requiring every 48-hour dosing. The median time to first therapeutic trough was 15.5 days (IQR, 5.5-18.5 days), and patients required a median of 1 dose adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

A median sirolimus dose to achieve therapeutic sirolimus trough concentrations in infants with lymphatic disorders was 0.5 mg/m2/day with a median of 1 dose adjustment. Sirolimus was well tolerated in the study population.

The relationship of vancomycin 24-hour AUC and trough concentration

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

Prior to the 2020 release of a joint consensus guideline on monitoring of vancomycin therapy for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, clinicians had escalated vancomycin doses for 2 decades while targeting trough concentrations of 15 to 20 µg/mL, leading to an increased frequency of nephrotoxicity. For MRSA infections, the 2020 guideline recommends adjusting doses to achieve a 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 400 to 600 µg · h/mL; however, monitoring of trough concentrations has been entrenched for 3 decades. Calculating dose regimens based on AUC will require obtaining an increased number of vancomycin serum concentrations and, possibly, advanced software. The aim of this investigation was to determine the relationship between AUC and trough concentration and the influence of dosing regimen on goal achievement.

METHODS

The relationship between trough concentration and AUC was explored through derivation of an equation based on a 1-compartment model and simulations.

RESULTS

24-hour AUC is related to dosing interval divided by half-life in a nonlinear fashion. The target trough concentration can be individualized to achieve a desired AUC range, and limiting use of large doses (>15-20 mg/kg) can protect against excessive 24-hour AUC with trough-only monitoring.

CONCLUSION

After initially determining pharmacokinetic parameters, subsequent monitoring of AUC can be accomplished using trough concentrations only. Trough concentration may be used as a surrogate for AUC, although the acceptable target trough concentration will vary depending on dosing interval and elimination rate constant. This work included development of an AUC-trough equation to establish a patient-specific target for steady-state trough concentration.

Therapeutic drug monitoring guided fluconazole therapy in a patient with cholangitis sepsis

Candida and other fungal species play an increasing role in nosocomial infections, including cholangitis and cholangiosepsis. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are essential in successful patient outcomes. Fluconazole is an antifungal of choice in fluconazole-sensitive Candida infections. Little information is known about the fluconazole biliary excretion. Decreased tissue penetration may be one of the possible causes of treatment failure. Due to favorable pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring of this antifungal has not been recommended routinely. In the presented case we report the successful therapeutic drug monitoring-guided fluconazole treatment in a patient with cholangitis and cholangiosepsis caused by fluconazole-sensitive Candida spp.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adult Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia or Pneumonia

Background

Vancomycin remains widely used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections; however, treatment failure rates up to 50% have been reported. At the authors' institution, monitoring of trough concentration is the standard of care for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin. New guidelines support use of the ratio of 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC₂₄/MIC) as the pharmacodynamic index most likely to predict outcomes in patients with MRSA-associated infections.

Objectives

To determine the discordance rate between trough levels and AUC₂₄/MIC values and how treatment failure and nephrotoxicity outcomes compare between those achieving and not achieving their pharmacodynamic targets.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study involved patients with MRSA bacteremia or pneumonia admitted to the study hospital between March 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, and treated with vancomycin. Data for trough concentrations were collected, and minimum concentrations (C _min) were extrapolated. The AUC₂₄/MIC values were determined using validated population pharmacokinetic models. The C _min and AUC₂₄/MIC values were characterized as below, within, or above pharmacodynamic targets (15-20 mg/L and 400-600, respectively). Discordance was defined as any instance where a patient's paired C _min and AUC₂₄/MIC values fell in different ranges (i.e., below, within, or above) relative to the target ranges. Predictors of treatment failure and nephrotoxicity were determined using logistic regression.

Results

A total of 128 patients were included in the analyses. Of these, 73 (57%) received an initial vancomycin dose less than 15 mg/kg. The discordance rate between C _min and AUC₂₄/MIC values was 21% (27/128). Rates of treatment failure and nephrotoxicity were 34% (43/128) and 18% (23/128), respectively. No clinical variables were found to predict discordance. Logistic regression identified initiation of vancomycin after a positive culture result (odds ratio [OR] 4.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-14.3) and achievement of target AUC₂₄/MIC after 4 days (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.39-8.70) as modifiable predictors of treatment failure.

Conclusions

The relationship between vancomycin monitoring and outcome is likely confounded by inadequate empiric or initial dosing. Before any modification of practice with respect to vancomycin monitoring, empiric vancomycin dosing should be optimized.

Should Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Based on the Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Be Standard for Serious Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections?-No

In this counterpoint we critically appraise the evidence supporting therapeutic drug monitoring based on the vancomycin 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. We reveal methodologically weaknesses and inconsistencies in the data and suggest that, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence of benefit compared with modestly reducing trough targets, alternative strategies are more likely to result in superior safety and efficacy. These include focusing on fundamental antibiotic stewardship to limit vancomycin exposure overall, achieving earlier and more complete source control, and establishing alternative therapeutic options to vancomycin. Implementation of AUC24-based therapeutic drug monitoring will take resources away from these more promising, alternative solutions.

A systematic review of population pharmacokinetic analyses of digoxin in the paediatric population

This is a PROSPERO registered systematic review (CRD42018105207), conducted to summarize the available knowledge regarding the population pharmacokinetics of digoxin in paediatrics and to identify the sources of variability in its disposition. PubMed, ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS and Science Direct databases were searched from inception to January 2019. All paediatric population pharmacokinetic studies of digoxin that utilized the nonlinear mixed-effect modelling approach were incorporated in this review, and data were synthesized descriptively. After application of the inclusion-exclusion criteria 8 studies were included. Most studies described digoxin pharmacokinetics as a 1-compartment model with only 1 study describing its pharmacokinetics as 2-compartments. Age was an important predictor of clearance in studies involving neonates or infants, other predictors of clearance were weight, height, serum creatinine, coadministration of spironolactone and presence of congestive heart failure. Congestive heart failure was also associated with an increased volume of distribution in 1 study. The estimated value of apparent clearance in a typical individual standardized by mean weight ranged between 0.24 and 0.56 L/h/kg, the interindividual variability in clearance ranged between 7.0 and 35.1%. Half of the studies evaluated the performance of their developed models via external evaluation. In conclusion, substantial predictors of digoxin pharmacokinetics in the paediatric population in addition to model characteristics and evaluation techniques are presented. For clinicians, clearance could be predicted using age especially in neonates or infants, weight, height, serum creatinine, coadministration of medications and disease status. For future researchers, designing pharmacokinetic studies that allow 2-compartment modelling and linking pharmacokinetics with pharmacodynamics is recommended.

Evaluation of vancomycin target trough attainment with published dosing regimens in the neonatal intensive care unit population

BACKGROUND

Study aims to evaluate whether vancomycin dosing from published dosing algorithms correlate with the attainment of target troughs of 10 to 20 mg/L.

METHODS

NICU patients who received minimum three doses of vancomycin and had a trough level met inclusion criteria. Dosing information was retrospectively evaluated to determine which published dosing regimen was followed. Dosing algorithms used were matched to NeoFax/Harriet Lane, renal-function directed dosing, and weight-directed dosing, in which the latter two can be found in Pediatric and Neonatal Lexi-Drugs. Primary outcome was percentage of troughs within therapeutic (10 to 20 mg/L) and subtherapeutic (less than 10 mg/L) levels.

RESULTS

Of 97 troughs evaluated, NeoFax/Harriet Lane accounted for 86.6%, renal-function directed accounted for 5.1%, and weight-directed dosing accounted for 18.5% of dosing algorithms. NeoFax/Harriet Lane, renal-function directed, and weight-directed dosing attained therapeutic levels between 10 to 20 mg/L at a rate of 60.7%, 60%, and 50% of the time, respectively. With respect to initiation of therapy, a higher dose of 15 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg attained therapeutic levels (p < 0.001; OR 11.22; 95% CI, 3.96 to 31.81), while a serum creatinine value below 0.5 mg/dL attained subtherapeutic levels (p = 0.028; OR 0.068; 95% CI, 0.006 to 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

NeoFax, Harriet Lane, and renal-directed dosing from Pediatric and Neonatal Lexi-Drugs achieved target troughs within the 10 to 20 mg/L range more often than weight-directed dosing from Pediatric and Neonatal Lexi-Drugs. Initiating therapy at a higher dose and patient serum creatinine value above 0.5 mg/dL were factors significantly associated with a 10 to 20 mg/L range.

Prospective evaluation of vancomycin therapeutic usage and trough levels monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Vancomycin is the cornerstone of parenteral therapy for serious methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Optimal dosing of vancomycin is patient specific due to its narrow therapeutic window. The objective of this study is to evaluate the appropriate use of vancomycin focusing on the indication, dose, and therapeutic level monitoring.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital over a 3- month period. A data collection form was used to gather information on 93 patients receiving vancomycin. Study outcomes were assessment of the appropriateness of vancomycin indication, dose, and therapeutic trough level.

RESULTS

The use of vancomycin both empirically and after culture results was appropriate in 78.5 % of the patients. More than half of the patients (51.6 %) were given an inappropriate dose of vancomycin per actual body weight, creatinine clearance, and  indication. Regarding therapeutic vancomycin monitoring, 69.0 % had inappropriate trough level monitoring. Only 15.7 % of the 166 measured troughs were within the target therapeutic level for the corresponding indication.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the high level of inappropriate use of vancomycin. This is mainly attributed to inappropriate dose and trough level monitoring. Interventions to improve vancomycin prescribing and monitoring practices are needed. The presence of an interdisciplinary team may improve the appropriate use of medications with a narrow therapeutic index such as vancomycin.

Enzalutamide and blocking androgen receptor in advanced prostate cancer: lessons learnt from the history of drug development of antiandrogens

Enzalutamide is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) both before and after chemotherapy. Enzalutamide is more effective than its predecessor bicalutamide, which was analyzed in head-to-head studies of patients with CRPC. This family of nonsteroidal antiandrogens is now comprised of four drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration with two investigational drugs in clinical trials. Antiandrogens have been employed clinically for more than five decades to provide a rich resource of information. Steady-state concentration minimums (C_min or trough) in the range of ~1–13 μg/mL are measured in patients at therapeutic doses. Interestingly, enzalutamide which is considered to have strong affinity for the androgen receptor (AR) requires C_min levels >10 μg/mL. The sequence of antiandrogens and the clinical order of application in regard to other drugs that target the androgen axis remain of high interest. One novel first-in-class drug, called ralaniten, which binds to a unique region in the N-terminus domain of both the full-length and the truncated constitutively active splice variants of the AR, is currently in clinical trials for patients who previously received abiraterone, enzalutamide, or both. This highlights the trend to develop drugs with novel mechanisms of action and potentially differing mechanisms of resistance compared with antiandrogens. Better and more complete inhibition of the transcriptional activity of the AR appears to continue to provide improvements in the clinical management of mCRPC.

Positive relationship between infliximab and adalimumab trough levels at completion of induction therapy with clinical response rates, at a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) therapies have improved outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) trough and antibody levels with clinical response rates at the end of induction.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center study. Patients were recruited from July 2015 to August 2016. Inclusion criteria were all inflammatory bowel disease patients older than 17 years who started treatment with IFX or ADL. Baseline clinical disease activity indexes were performed. Clinical response was defined as HBI ≤3 or partial Mayo score ≤4% or <30% reduction from baseline. Anti-TNFα trough and antibody levels were measured using standard ELISA techniques.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were recruited, of whom 23 had Crohn's disease and 12 had ulcerative colitis. Eighteen were treated with ADL and 17 with IFX. The mean age of the cohort was 40.3 years, 62.9% were females, 34.3% were on concomitant thiopurines, and 25.7% had prior anti-TNFα exposure. Overall response rate was 51.4%, 33.3% for ADL and 70.6% for IFX.Mean trough levels were 12.5 μg/mL for IFX and 4.4 μg/mL for ADL. There was a clear link between higher anti-TNFα trough levels at the end of induction with clinical response rates. For IFX, mean trough level was 16.4 μg/mL for responders versus 5.3 μg/mL for non-responders (P = 0.026). Area under the curve for association of IFX level at induction with clinical response was 0.864 (P = 0.0001). Similar link was present between higher ADL levels with clinical response, although not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Higher trough levels at the end of induction are associated with improved response. Ongoing work will define optimal targets at this key timeframe.

Peak Measurement for Vancomycin AUC Estimation in Obese Adults Improves Precision and Lowers Bias

Vancomycin area under the curve (AUC) estimates may be skewed in obese adults due to weight-dependent pharmacokinetic parameters. We demonstrate that peak and trough measurements reduce bias and improve the precision of vancomycin AUC estimates in obese adults (n = 75) and validate this in an independent cohort (n = 31). The precision and mean percent bias of Bayesian vancomycin AUC estimates are comparable between covariate-dependent (R² = 0.774, 3.55%) and covariate-independent (R² = 0.804, 3.28%) models when peaks and troughs are measured but not when measurements are restricted to troughs only (R² = 0.557, 15.5%).

Early Vancomycin Concentrations and the Applications of a Pharmacokinetic Extrapolation Method to Recognize Sub-Therapeutic Outcomes

Vancomycin trough concentrations should be measured within 30 min of the next dose, but studies have shown that troughs are often measured too early, producing erroneous results that could lead to dosing errors. The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency of early trough measurements and to evaluate whether pharmacokinetically extrapolating mistimed concentrations may locate sub-therapeutic concentrations. Vancomycin troughs were retrospectively reviewed. For troughs ≥10 mg/L and measured >0.5 h early, the true trough was estimated using pharmacokinetic extrapolation methods to identify sub-therapeutic outcomes. Differences ≥2 mg/L between the measured and estimated true trough level was considered to have potential clinical significance. Of 143 troughs evaluated, 62 (43%) were measured too early and 48 of those troughs were ≥10 mg/L. 25% of those 48 troughs were sub-therapeutic. The potential for a difference ≥2 mg/L between the measured and estimated true trough was found to be greatest when the measured trough was ≥10 mg/L, the patient’s creatinine clearance (CrCl) was ≥60 mL/min, and the timing error was ≥2 h. To increase the therapeutic utility of early vancomycin trough concentrations, estimated true troughs can be determined by extrapolating measured values based on the time difference and CrCl.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Serum Infliximab Levels During Maintenance Therapy and Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A number of observational studies have reported an association between serum levels of infliximab [IFX] at various thresholds, and clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. This association has not previously been systematically analysed.

METHODS

Systematic review of studies that reported serum infliximab levels according to outcomes in IBD. Primary outcome was clinical remission, and secondary outcomes included endoscopic remission, C-reactive protein [CRP] levels, and colectomy. Meta-analysis of raw data was performed where appropriate. A quality assessment was also undertaken.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 3483 patients; 12 studies reported IFX levels in a manner suitable for determining effect estimates. During maintenance therapy, patients in clinical remission had significantly higher mean trough IFX levels than patients not in remission: 3.1 µg/ml versus 0.9 µg/ml. The standardised mean difference in serum IFX levels between groups was 0.6 µg/ml (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.9, p = 0.0002]. Patients with an IFX level > 2 µg/ml were more likely to be in clinical remission (risk ratio [RR] 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.7, p < 0.001], or achieve endoscopic remission [RR 3, 95% CI 1.4-6.5, p = 0.004] than patients with levels < 2 µg/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant difference between serum infliximab levels in patients with IBD in remission, compared with those who relapse. A trough threshold during maintenance > 2 µg/ml is associated with a greater probability of clinical remission and mucosal healing.

Evaluation of vancomycin dosing and corresponding drug concentrations in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe the relationships between dosing strategy, age, and vancomycin trough concentrations in pediatric patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of hospitalized pediatric patients between 2 months and 17 years of age treated with intravenous vancomycin from 2008 to 2011. The primary outcome was the number of patients achieving a target trough concentration of 10 to 20 μg/mL in each age group and dosing group. The secondary outcomes were the number of patients in each group to achieve a trough concentration of 15 to 20 μg/mL and the incidence of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included in the analysis. Forty-six of 159 evaluated troughs (28.9%) were within the target range of 10 to 20 μg/mL. Dose was found to have a statistically significant effect on the ability to achieve a trough within the target range (P = .01). Of the 159 trough concentrations evaluated, only 11 (6.9%) were within the range of 15 to 20 μg/mL. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 7 patients and was not associated with supratherapeutic trough concentration or dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of trough concentrations within the target range of 10 to 20 μg/mL was low, and younger patients often needed doses >60 mg/kg per day to achieve a trough concentration in this range. The dose of vancomycin was found to have a statistically significant effect on the ability to achieve a trough concentration within the target range.

A randomized trial of loading vancomycin in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Optimizing vancomycin dosing may help eradicate bacteria while avoiding resistance. The guidelines recommend loading doses; however, there are no data to demonstrate that this may result in a more rapid achievement of therapeutic troughs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the percentage of troughs reaching therapeutic levels at 12, 24, and 36 hours following an initial vancomycin dose of 30 mg/kg compared with 15 mg/kg.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized study was performed in a community academic medical center. Patients who were to receive vancomycin in the emergency department were randomized to an initial traditional dose of 15 mg/kg or a 30-mg/kg loading dose followed by 15 mg/kg every 12 hours for 3 doses. Patients weighing >120 kg or with creatinine clearances <50 mL/min were excluded.

RESULTS

In total, 99 patients were enrolled; 12 hours after the initial dose of vancomycin, there was a significantly greater proportion of patients reaching target trough levels of 15 mg/L among the patients who received a loading dose as compared with a traditional dose (34% vs 3%, P < 0.01). This trend continued at 24 hours but was not statistically significant. At 36 hours, there was no difference in the percentage of patients reaching target levels between the 2 groups. No statistically significant difference in nephrotoxicity or adverse events among the 2 groups was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

A loading dose of 30 mg/kg of vancomycin achieved a higher percentage of therapeutic levels at 12 hours when compared with the traditional dose of 15 mg/kg, without increased nephrotoxicity or adverse events.

Lower calcineurin inhibitor doses in older compared to younger kidney transplant recipients yield similar troughs

The number of older adults undergoing kidney transplantation has increased, yet little is known about calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) metabolism in this group. We studied CNI troughs and doses to determine if there were age-related differences in metabolism and dose requirements. We studied 348 young (18-34 years), 1831 middle (35-64 years) and 374 older (65-84 years) adult kidney transplant recipients enrolled in a seven-center prospective study. Troughs were obtained from each patient 2×/week in weeks 1-8 and 2×/month in months 3-6. A multivariable linear-mixed model examined the effect of age on log dose and weight normalized troughs. Older recipients had higher normalized tacrolimus troughs than middle or young age adults despite receiving doses a median of 1-2 mg/day lower. Age and CYP3A5*1 genotype had the largest effect on tacrolimus troughs. Older recipients also had higher normalized cyclosporine troughs than middle or young adults despite receiving median doses 100 mg/day lower. After normalization for dose and weight, CNI troughs were more than 50% higher in older adults than young adults. These data support age-related changes in CNI metabolism. Further studies are needed to determine optimal dosing of CNIs in the elderly.