Impact of Central Nervous System Stimulant Medication Use on Growth in Pediatric Populations with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Review

Can exposure to lisdexamfetamine dimesylate from juvenile period to peripubertal compromise male reproductive parameters in adult rats?

Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is a d-amphetamine prodrug used to treat attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, a common neurodevelopmental disorder in children and adolescents. Due to its action mediated by elevated levels of catecholamines, mainly dopamine and noradrenaline, which influence hormonal regulation and directly affect the gonads, this drug may potentially disrupt reproductive performance. This study evaluated the effects of exposure to LDX from the juvenile to peripubertal period (critical stages of development) on systemic and reproductive toxicity parameters in male rats. Male Wistar rats (23 days old) were treated with 0; 5.2; 8.6 or 12.1 mg/kg/day of LDX from post-natal day (PND) 23 to 53, by gavage. LDX treatment led to reduced daily food and water consumption, as well as a decrease in social behaviors. The day of preputial separation remained unaltered, although the treated animals exhibited reduced weight. At PND 54, the treated animals presented signs of systemic toxicity, evidenced by a reduction in body weight gain, increase in the relative weight of the liver, spleen, and seminal gland, reduction in erythrocyte and leukocyte counts, reduced total protein levels, and disruptions in oxidative parameters. In adulthood, there was an increase in immobile sperm, reduced sperm count, morphometric changes in the testis, and altered oxidative parameters, without compromising male sexual behavior and fertility. These findings showed that LDX-treatment during the juvenile and peripubertal periods induced immediate systemic toxicity and adversely influenced reproductive function in adult life, indicating that caution is necessary when prescribing this drug during the peripubertal phase.

The Perception of Primary School Teachers Regarding the Pharmacotherapy of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is raising concerns across health systems, affecting about 5% of the school-age population. Therapy usually involves psychostimulants, which are prone to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Teachers have many contact hours with children and can easily detect behavioral changes upon the beginning of medication. However, few studies have focused on the role of teachers in the management of ADHD children and detection of ADRs. The present work aimed to characterize the perception of primary school teachers regarding the impact of ADHD therapeutics. A questionnaire was constructed focused on teachers’ training regarding ADHD and its therapy; experience with students with ADHD; changes upon beginning of medication; and observation of ADRs. A total of 107 completed questionnaires were obtained. The results indicate that more than 40% of the inquired teachers have received training in ADHD, but in most cases, the theme of therapeutics was absent from that training. The vast majority of teachers (91.6%) have had students with ADHD and observed mood alterations associated with medications. More than 60% of the teachers answered that they are aware of the ADRs and of these, 24% have already detected them in their students. The teachers reported the observed ADRs to parents in 93% of the cases and to doctors in 28% of the cases. In conclusion, the results show the need to reinforce teachers’ training in ADHD and its therapeutics.

Economic burden of growth hormone deficiency in a US pediatric population

BACKGROUND: Pediatric growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a rare disorder of short stature that is currently treated with daily injections of somatropin. In addition to short stature, GHD is associated with other comorbidities such as impaired musculoskeletal development, cardiovascular disease, and decreased quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To analyze somatropin utilization, adherence, and health care costs among children with GHD who had either Medicaid or commercial health insurance. METHODS: Children (aged < 18 years) with a GHD diagnosis between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017, were identified in the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid databases. Patients with at least 12- and 6-month continuous enrollment pre- and postdiagnosis were eligible. Children with GHD were direct matched (1:3) to controls without GHD (or other short stature-related disorders) on age, gender, plan type, region, and race (Medicaid only). Index date was the date of the first GHD diagnosis during the selection window for GHD patients and using random assignment for controls. Patients were followed until the end of continuous database enrollment or December 31, 2018. Baseline comorbidities and medications were measured during the 12 months pre-index, whereas somatropin treatment patterns along with all-cause and GHD-related health care costs were measured during the variable follow-up period. Multivariable modeling was used to compare costs between GHD patients and controls and between somatropin-treated and -untreated GHD patients while adjusting for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: There were 6,820 Medicaid and 14,070 commercial patients with GHD who met the study inclusion criteria. Mean (SD) age at index was 9.5 (4.5) years for Medicaid patients and 11.1 (3.7) years for commercial patients. The majority of patients were male (> 65%), and mean follow-up time for all cases and controls was 3-4 years. Overall, 63.2% of Medicaid and 68.4% of commercial GHD patients were treated with somatropin at some point during follow-up. Among Medicaid GHD patients, the treatment rate was highest among White males and lowest among Black females. Adherence was low as the proportion of days covered was ≥ 80% for only 18.4% of Medicaid patients and 32.3% of commercial patients and 49.1% of treated Medicaid and 24.3% of treated commercial patients discontinued before turning age 13. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, all-cause non-somatropin annualized costs were 5.67 times higher (Δ$19,309) for Medicaid GHD patients and 5.46 times higher (Δ$12,305) for commercial GHD patients than matched non-GHD controls. Adjusted all-cause non-somatropin annualized costs were 0.59 times lower (Δ$14,416) for treated Medicaid patients and 0.69 times lower (Δ$7,650) for treated commercial patients than for untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric GHD presents a significant health care burden, and many patients remain untreated or undertreated. Untreated GHD was associated with higher non-somatropin health care costs than treated GHD. Strategies to optimize treatment and improve adherence may reduce the health care burden faced by these patients. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Ascendis Pharma, Inc. Smith and Pitukcheewanont are employed by Ascendis Pharma, Inc. Manjelievskaia, Lopez-Gonzalez, and Morrow are employed by IBM Watson Health, which received funding from Ascendis Pharma, Inc., to conduct this study. Kaplowitz is a paid consultant of Ascendis Pharma, Inc.

Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Are at Increased Risk for Slowed Growth and Short Stature in Early Childhood

Our objective was to evaluate the risk of short stature in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the effect of ADHD and its treatment on height-for-age z score (HAZ) and body mass index-for-age z score (BMIZ) in early childhood. We evaluated 7603 children from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort 2011 and found that children with ADHD had lower HAZ at second and fourth grades and lower BMIZ at K to fourth grade. Children with ADHD at fourth grade had almost 4 times higher odds of short stature. Children with ADHD at K grew at a slower rate from K to fourth grade (difference in ΔHAZ = 0.23, 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.42) and had less gain in BMI (difference in ΔBMIZ = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = 0.03-0.29). Longer duration of ADHD medication use was associated with lower HAZ at fourth grade and slower growth from K to fourth grade. These data may assist pediatricians in considering risk of poor growth in children with ADHD.