1
|
Cabanilla MG, Bernauer ML, Atallah LM, Briski MJ, Koury J, Thompson CM, Rodriguez CN, Jakeman B, Byrd TF. Short versus long duration of ceftaroline combination therapy and outcomes in persistent or high-grade MRSA bacteremia: A retrospective single-center study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304103. [PMID: 38768130 PMCID: PMC11104650 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with high mortality rates. Despite antibiotic therapy, persistent bacteremia is challenging to treat. Combination therapy with ceftaroline has emerged as a potential treatment option; however, the optimal duration and clinical implications after bacteremia clearance are unknown. METHODS This retrospective cohort study examined patients with high-grade or persistent MRSA bacteremia who were treated with ceftaroline combination therapy at the University of New Mexico Hospital between January 2014 and June 2021. Patients were categorized into short- (<7 days) or long-duration (≥7 days) groups based on the duration of combination therapy after bacteremia clearance. Outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, bacteremia recurrence, post-bacteremia clearance length of stay, and adverse events. RESULTS A total of 32 patients were included in this study. The most common sources of bacteremia were bone/joint and endovascular (28.1%, 9/32 each). The median duration of combination therapy after clearance was seven days (IQR 2.8, 11). Patients in the long-duration group had a lower Charlson comorbidity index (1.0 vs 5.5, p = 0.017) than those in the short-duration group. After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in the 30-day all-cause mortality between the groups (AOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.007-1.85, p = 0.18). No association was found between combination therapy duration and recurrence (OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.19-inf, p = 0.24) or adverse drug events (OR 3.46, 95% CI 0.39-74.86, p = 0.31). After controlling for total hospital length of stay, there was no significant difference in the post-bacteremia clearance length of stay between the two groups (p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS Prolonging ceftaroline combination therapy after bacteremia clearance did not significantly improve outcomes in patients with persistent or high-grade MRSA bacteremia. The limitations of this study warrant cautious interpretation of its results. Larger studies are needed to determine the optimal duration and role of combination therapy for this difficult-to-treat infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Gabriela Cabanilla
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
- Department of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | | | - Liana M. Atallah
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Matthew J. Briski
- Department of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Jason Koury
- Department of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Cecilia M. Thompson
- TriCore Reference Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Chelsea N. Rodriguez
- Department of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Bernadette Jakeman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Thomas F. Byrd
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kufel WD, Zagoria Z, Blaine BE, Steele JM, Mahapatra R, Paolino KM, Thomas SJ. Daptomycin Plus Oxacillin for Persistent Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Ann Pharmacother 2024; 58:360-365. [PMID: 37542415 DOI: 10.1177/10600280231189888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The preferred antibiotic salvage regimen for persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MSSAB) is unclear. Ertapenem with cefazolin or an antistaphylococcal penicillin has been primarily described, but identifying alternative carbapenem-sparing options may support antibiotic stewardship efforts and decrease the risk of antibiotic-associated Clostridioides difficile infection. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin plus oxacillin (D/O) for persistent MSSAB. METHODS This was a single-center, retrospective cohort of patients with persistent MSSAB who received D/O between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2023. Adult patients were included if they had blood cultures positive for MSSA ≥72 hours and received D/O combination for ≥48 hours. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, incarcerated, or received another antibiotic considered to have excellent activity against MSSA. The primary outcome was time to MSSA bacteremia clearance post-daptomycin initiation. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, hospital length of stay, 90-day all-cause mortality, MSSA bacteremia-related mortality, 90-day readmission for MSSAB, and incidence of antibiotic-associated adverse effects. Time to MSSAB clearance post-D/O initiation was plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimation. RESULTS Seven unique patient encounters were identified including 4 with endocarditis. Despite a median MSSA bacteremia duration of 7.8 days, median clearance was 2 days post-daptomycin initiation. All achieved microbiological cure, and no adverse effects were reported. Ninety-day all-cause mortality, MSSAB-related mortality, and 90-day readmission for MSSAB occurred in 28.6%, 14.3%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE D/O was an effective, well-tolerated salvage regimen in this cohort and may represent a carbapenem-sparing option for persistent MSSAB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley D Kufel
- Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton, NY, USA
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Zoey Zagoria
- Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton, NY, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey M Steele
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Rahul Mahapatra
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Kristopher M Paolino
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Stephen J Thomas
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oliva A, Cogliati Dezza F, Cancelli F, Curtolo A, Falletta A, Volpicelli L, Venditti M. New Antimicrobials and New Therapy Strategies for Endocarditis: Weapons That Should Be Defended. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7693. [PMID: 38137762 PMCID: PMC10743892 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Oliva
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (F.C.D.); (F.C.); (A.C.); (A.F.); (L.V.); (M.V.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fang P, Gao K, Yang J, Li T, Gong W, Sun Q, Wang Y. Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens Causing Neonatal Early and Late Onset Sepsis, a Retrospective Study from the Tertiary Referral Children's Hospital. Infect Drug Resist 2023; 16:4213-4225. [PMID: 37404253 PMCID: PMC10317526 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s416020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Sepsis is the most severe infectious disease with the highest mortality rate, particularly among neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). This study retrospectively analyzed the epidemiology, antibiotic resistance profiles, and prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria isolated from blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures in order to evaluate the appropriateness of initial empirical therapy for neonatal sepsis. Methods A retrospective study was conducted in the NICU from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. Microbiological data from patients admitted to the NICU were anonymously extracted from the Laboratory of Microbiology database. Neonatal sepsis was classified into two types: early-onset sepsis (EOS), which occurs within the first 72 hours of life, and late-onset sepsis (LOS) for those begins later. Results A total of 679 bacterial strains, 543 from blood and 136 from CSF, were detected in 631 neonates. Among these, 378 isolates (55.67%) were Gram-positive bacteria, and 301 isolates (44.33%) were Gram-negative bacteria. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (36.52%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.47%) and Escherichia coli (13.84%). In EOS, 121 strains were found, CoNS represented the majority (33.88%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.97%) and Escherichia coli (8.26%). Early-onset septicemia exhibited 67 (55.37%) MDR bacteria. In LOS, 558 strains were isolated, CoNS represented the majority of pathogens (37.10%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.71%) and Escherichia coli (15.05%). Late-onset septicemia showed 332 (59.50%) MDR bacteria. High rates of MDR were found in CoNS (76.21%), carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (66.91%), and MRSA (33.33%). Conclusion The study revealed an alarming prevalence of MDR strains isolated from neonatal sepsis, emphasizing the necessity of finding effective prevention and treatment measures. Colistin can be used for MDR Gram-negative bacteria, while vancomycin and teicoplanin can be considered treatment therapies for staphylococcal infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panpan Fang
- Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Children’s Infection and Immunity, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Henan Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Kaijie Gao
- Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Children’s Infection and Immunity, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Henan Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junmei Yang
- Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Children’s Infection and Immunity, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Henan Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tiewei Li
- Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Children’s Infection and Immunity, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Henan Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Weihua Gong
- Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Children’s Infection and Immunity, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Henan Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qianqian Sun
- Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Children’s Infection and Immunity, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Henan Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yingyuan Wang
- Department of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Henan Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gatica S, Fuentes B, Rivera-Asín E, Ramírez-Céspedes P, Sepúlveda-Alfaro J, Catalán EA, Bueno SM, Kalergis AM, Simon F, Riedel CA, Melo-Gonzalez F. Novel evidence on sepsis-inducing pathogens: from laboratory to bedside. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1198200. [PMID: 37426029 PMCID: PMC10327444 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1198200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition and a significant cause of preventable morbidity and mortality globally. Among the leading causative agents of sepsis are bacterial pathogens Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes, along with fungal pathogens of the Candida species. Here, we focus on evidence from human studies but also include in vitro and in vivo cellular and molecular evidence, exploring how bacterial and fungal pathogens are associated with bloodstream infection and sepsis. This review presents a narrative update on pathogen epidemiology, virulence factors, host factors of susceptibility, mechanisms of immunomodulation, current therapies, antibiotic resistance, and opportunities for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics, through the perspective of bloodstream infection and sepsis. A list of curated novel host and pathogen factors, diagnostic and prognostic markers, and potential therapeutical targets to tackle sepsis from the research laboratory is presented. Further, we discuss the complex nature of sepsis depending on the sepsis-inducing pathogen and host susceptibility, the more common strains associated with severe pathology and how these aspects may impact in the management of the clinical presentation of sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Gatica
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile
| | - Brandon Fuentes
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile
| | - Elizabeth Rivera-Asín
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile
| | - Paula Ramírez-Céspedes
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile
| | - Javiera Sepúlveda-Alfaro
- Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Eduardo A. Catalán
- Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Susan M. Bueno
- Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alexis M. Kalergis
- Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Departamento de Endocrinología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Felipe Simon
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile
| | - Claudia A. Riedel
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile
| | - Felipe Melo-Gonzalez
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|